This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3048 2461347.8048 12.23 21:52:21.84 +67:18:08.9
106.90457 10.18684 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V0598 Cep
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.600 V 14.300 V 44.900000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:52:21.84 +67:18:08.9: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:52:21.84 +67:18:08.9: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0598 Cep,2461347.8048,12.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0598 Cep 20261103.3048 12.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3048 2461347.8048 11.99 22:18:26.37 +67:05:53.8
108.83257 8.51405 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J2218262+670550
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.029 g Y 0.976 g 2458334.68730 193.572793500000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:18:26.37 +67:05:53.8: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:18:26.37 +67:05:53.8: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J2218262+670550,2461347.8048,11.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J2218262+670550 20261103.3048 11.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3048 2461347.8048 13.19 19:53:59.06 +73:05:30.3
105.41289 21.50022 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:53:59.06 +73:05:30.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 19:53:59.06 +73:05:30.3: 14.26 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 19:53:59.06 +73:05:30.3: 14.12 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461347.8048,13.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261103.3048 13.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3048 2461347.8048 13.38 21:49:51.31 +68:31:22.6
107.51723 11.27441 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ASASSN-V J214951.12+683119.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.840 V 15.510 V 2458343.83120 174.687850000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:49:51.31 +68:31:22.6: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:49:51.31 +68:31:22.6: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J214951.12+683119.0,2461347.8048,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J214951.12+683119.0 20261103.3048 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3048 2461347.8048 11.52 21:23:25.01 +69:08:58.3
106.17554 13.36303 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J212324.93+690857.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.700 g Y 0.410 g 2458994.02300 39.930000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:23:25.01 +69:08:58.3: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:23:25.01 +69:08:58.3: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J212324.93+690857.9,2461347.8048,11.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J212324.93+690857.9 20261103.3048 11.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3048 2461347.8048 12.77 22:57:16.88 +71:39:22.3
114.12807 10.76328 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" NSVS J2257195+713912
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.025 g Y 1.366 g 2458282.78270 221.705447100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:57:16.88 +71:39:22.3: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:57:16.88 +71:39:22.3: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J2257195+713912,2461347.8048,12.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J2257195+713912 20261103.3048 12.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3048 2461347.8048 12.99 21:35:42.56 +68:39:07.1
106.62217 12.23108 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J2135423+683909
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.526 g Y 3.614 g 2458471.96190 299.638372300000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:35:42.56 +68:39:07.1: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:35:42.56 +68:39:07.1: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J2135423+683909,2461347.8048,12.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J2135423+683909 20261103.3048 12.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3048 2461347.8048 11.10 23:02:16.05 +72:09:24.7
114.70142 11.05234 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" V1246 Cep
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.600 V < 14.500 V 2460285.00000 346.350000000000 M
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 23:02:16.05 +72:09:24.7: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 23:02:16.05 +72:09:24.7: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1246 Cep,2461347.8048,11.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1246 Cep 20261103.3048 11.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461235.89370125 14.07.2026 09:26:45.788 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
First image: 2461235.89370125 14.07.2026 09:26:45.788 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
Last image: 2461347.80506304 03.11.2026 07:19:07.447 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 29
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 17210
Objects passed selection criteria: 17196
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16343.5
Average stars matched: 15761.2 (96.4374 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 241732 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 01:29:28 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461235.89370125 14.07.2026 09:26:45.788 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
First image: 2461235.89370125 14.07.2026 09:26:45.788 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
Last image: 2461347.80506304 03.11.2026 07:19:07.447 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 128
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.99
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 47 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 97603
Objects passed selection criteria: 97423
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 87969.2
Average stars matched: 83712.5 (95.1611 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 561012 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 01:31:19 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.80444350
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:35:58.247 +69:59:44.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:35:57.834 +70:00:03.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:35:58.247 +69:59:44.58
Second-epoch image center 21:35:57.834 +70:00:03.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0052 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:36:00.137 +69:59:22.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:35:58.247 +69:59:44.58
Second-epoch image center 21:36:00.137 +69:59:22.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0067 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:35:57.834 +70:00:03.09
Second-epoch second image center 21:36:00.137 +69:59:22.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01174 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yoLc5H1evp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.k6PFEYD3fc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FZIlRP8eT6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8dSKTMLY7U
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits and wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits and wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits and wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 17036 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 296.6210 to 352.3092 deg, Dec +63.4689 to +75.2697 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 296.6210 to 352.3092 deg, Dec 63.4689 to 75.2697 deg
Loaded 14768 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8445 out of 8938 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8938 out of 17036 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.675000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.675000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 17036 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 296.6210 to 352.3092 deg, Dec +63.4689 to +75.2697 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 296.6210 to 352.3092 deg, Dec 63.4689 to 75.2697 deg
Loaded 14768 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8445 out of 8938 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8938 out of 17036 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 17960 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 296.1625 to 352.1409 deg, Dec +63.6103 to +75.2856 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 296.1625 to 352.1409 deg, Dec 63.6103 to 75.2856 deg
Loaded 14550 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8530 out of 8996 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8996 out of 17960 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 26 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
2.3 pix Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
4.5 pix fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
4.5 pix fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
15.5 mag. Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.yoLc5H1evp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1211, bad_region=0, passed=17036
Got 17036 stars (including 15815 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17036 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17036 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17036 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17036 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.742 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.614 n_q1=1306 n_q2=864 n_q3=1497 n_q4=1242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.452
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4909 N_valid=4909 bias_ra_arcsec=0.045 bias_dec_arcsec=0.010 median_sep_arcsec=0.435 p95_sep_arcsec=2.704 n_q1=1306 n_q2=864 n_q3=1497 n_q4=1242 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits -region wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.k6PFEYD3fc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1202, bad_region=0, passed=17958
Got 17958 stars (including 16735 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17958 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.697 n_q1=1267 n_q2=1500 n_q3=869 n_q4=1272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.316
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4908 N_valid=4908 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.013 bias_dec_arcsec=0.028 median_sep_arcsec=0.369 p95_sep_arcsec=2.480 n_q1=1267 n_q2=1500 n_q3=869 n_q4=1272 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FZIlRP8eT6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=819, bad_region=0, passed=15379
Got 15379 stars (including 14557 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15379 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15379 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15379 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15379 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=12.422 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.126 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.126 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.540 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.976 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.976 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.459 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.850 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.850 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4897 robust_rms_before=1.424 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.479 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.459 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.973 worst_region_rms_after=0.850 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.225 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.850
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.sip_refit.oml0EJ/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.sip_refit.oml0EJ/candidate.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:35:57.880 +70:00:03.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 15379 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.sip_refit.oml0EJ/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_1279301.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.sip_refit.oml0EJ/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.5b6est' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_1279301.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.424 -> 0.459 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4897 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4719 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4719 pairs (4897 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4719 robust_rms=12.278 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.902 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.902 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4719 robust_rms=0.535 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.937 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.937 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4719 robust_rms=0.453 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.815 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.815 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4719 robust_rms_before=0.453 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.453 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.453 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.823 worst_region_rms_after=0.815 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.823 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.815
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.sip_refit.9dRHr1/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.sip_refit.9dRHr1/candidate.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:35:57.880 +70:00:03.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 15379 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.sip_refit.9dRHr1/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_1300644.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.sip_refit.9dRHr1/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.2ePRUg' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_1300644.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.453 -> 0.453 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15379 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15379 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits N_match=4719 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.584 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.444 n_q1=1266 n_q2=768 n_q3=1543 n_q4=1142 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.243
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4719 N_valid=4719 bias_ra_arcsec=0.015 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.374 p95_sep_arcsec=1.474 n_q1=1266 n_q2=768 n_q3=1543 n_q4=1142 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8dSKTMLY7U (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=830, bad_region=0, passed=15397
Got 15397 stars (including 14556 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15397 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=12.499 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.876 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.876 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.565 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.018 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.018 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.452 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.873 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.873 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4898 robust_rms_before=1.471 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.478 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.452 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.988 worst_region_rms_after=0.873 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.187 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.873
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.sip_refit.YrkVdo/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.sip_refit.YrkVdo/candidate.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:36:00.173 +69:59:22.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 15397 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.sip_refit.YrkVdo/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_1279532.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.sip_refit.YrkVdo/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.qqWmCx' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_1279532.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.471 -> 0.452 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4898 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4717 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4717 pairs (4898 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4717 robust_rms=12.380 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.400 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.400 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4717 robust_rms=0.563 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.972 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.972 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4717 robust_rms=0.449 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.841 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.841 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4717 robust_rms_before=0.447 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.447 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.449 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.845 worst_region_rms_after=0.841 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.845 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.841
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.sip_refit.MSzaXx/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.sip_refit.MSzaXx/candidate.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:36:00.172 +69:59:22.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 15397 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.sip_refit.MSzaXx/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_1301692.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.sip_refit.MSzaXx/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.gabVqr' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_1301692.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.447 -> 0.449 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4717 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4717 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits N_match=4717 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.479 n_q1=1272 n_q2=770 n_q3=1535 n_q4=1140 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4717 N_valid=4717 bias_ra_arcsec=0.006 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.375 p95_sep_arcsec=1.489 n_q1=1272 n_q2=770 n_q3=1535 n_q4=1140 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits sigma_overall=0.511 worst_q_ratio=1.452
ref2=Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits sigma_overall=0.530 worst_q_ratio=1.316
new1=fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits sigma_overall=0.470 worst_q_ratio=1.243
new2=fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits sigma_overall=0.474 worst_q_ratio=1.235
reference average sigma_overall=0.5205 worst_q_ratio=1.384
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309_astrometric_residuals.png (4909 matched stars from wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332_astrometric_residuals.png (4908 matched stars from wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331_astrometric_residuals.png (4719 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332_astrometric_residuals.png (4717 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cep-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:32:12.25 +74:00:41.9: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:32:13.81 +64:30:36.8: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:57:26.50 +67:09:20.5: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:10:33.86 +66:59:29.7: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:18:26.40 +67:05:53.5: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:59:43.17 +69:43:13.7: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:36:28.06 +68:43:41.7: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:52:21.85 +67:18:08.8: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 23:06:05.67 +72:08:56.8: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:10:33.86 +66:59:29.7: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:18:26.40 +67:05:53.5: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:57:26.50 +67:09:20.5: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:32:13.81 +64:30:36.8: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:51:22.59 +65:12:37.2: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:10:33.86 +66:59:29.7: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0874 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:57:26.50 +67:09:20.5: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8572 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:18:26.40 +67:05:53.5: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9697 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:32:13.81 +64:30:36.8: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0359 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:32:12.25 +74:00:41.9: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:32:12.25 +74:00:41.9: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9690 delta=0.80 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:52:21.85 +67:18:08.8: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:59:43.17 +69:43:13.7: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:36:28.06 +68:43:41.7: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:52:21.85 +67:18:08.8: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2176 delta=0.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:59:43.17 +69:43:13.7: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3014 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:36:28.06 +68:43:41.7: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1986 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 23:06:05.67 +72:08:56.8: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:06:05.67 +72:08:56.8: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3497 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:51:22.59 +65:12:37.2: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:51:22.59 +65:12:37.2: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2704 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:54:13.49 +68:35:11.3: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:12:24.59 +69:12:00.8: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:26:41.49 +67:31:24.5: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:09:00.51 +67:38:20.1: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:12:24.59 +69:12:00.8: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:54:13.49 +68:35:11.3: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:12:24.59 +69:12:00.8: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3115 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:26:41.49 +67:31:24.5: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:54:13.49 +68:35:11.3: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2999 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:26:41.49 +67:31:24.5: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3591 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:44:28.76 +73:38:03.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:09:00.51 +67:38:20.1: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:09:00.51 +67:38:20.1: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4359 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:44:28.76 +73:38:03.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:44:28.76 +73:38:03.6: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21924.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21802_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21802_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21803_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21803_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21848_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21848_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:27:31.46 +71:48:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21856_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21856_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:02:16.16 +72:09:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21875_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21875_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:48:13.49 +69:58:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21914_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21914_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21924_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21924_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:18:26.40 +67:05:53.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#esa_tap#, MAG_MEAN=11.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.882 2219085911083860096 334.61042593562 +67.09801395227 11.0727 9.5893 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.882#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21929_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21929_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:36:38.58 +68:17:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21931_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21931_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:30.62 +68:36:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21934_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21934_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21943_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21943_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:40:36.50 +66:30:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21953_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21953_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21967_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21967_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21969_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21969_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:40:59.44 +69:46:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21974_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21974_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21975_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21975_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21985_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21985_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21987_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21987_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:40:03.29 +70:32:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21989_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21989_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21993_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21993_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21994_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21994_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21995_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21995_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22001_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 22001_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:54.93 +73:05:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11427_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 11427_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:46:12.27 +67:38:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03315_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 03315_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:10.67 +71:59:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02022_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 02022_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cep-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:35:58.247 +69:59:44.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:35:57.880 +70:00:03.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:35:58.247 +69:59:44.58
Second-epoch image center 21:35:57.880 +70:00:03.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0052 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:36:00.172 +69:59:22.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:35:58.247 +69:59:44.58
Second-epoch image center 21:36:00.172 +69:59:22.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0067 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:35:57.880 +70:00:03.16
Second-epoch second image center 21:36:00.172 +69:59:22.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01174 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6HxenwoelC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I4hMCcJQnO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NDN8lPYxgP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.D9YfjGib7C
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits and wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits and wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits and wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 106328 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 296.0927 to 352.3091 deg, Dec +63.4691 to +75.2696 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 296.0927 to 352.3091 deg, Dec 63.4691 to 75.2696 deg
Loaded 14908 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7500 out of 9091 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9091 out of 106328 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.548500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.548500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.99
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 106328 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 296.0927 to 352.3091 deg, Dec +63.4691 to +75.2696 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 296.0927 to 352.3091 deg, Dec 63.4691 to 75.2696 deg
Loaded 14908 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7500 out of 9091 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9091 out of 106328 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 109415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 295.8410 to 352.2720 deg, Dec +63.6067 to +75.2924 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 295.8410 to 352.2720 deg, Dec 63.6067 to 75.2924 deg
Loaded 14679 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7528 out of 9103 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9103 out of 109415 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 93 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
2.1 pix Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
4.0 pix fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
4.0 pix fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
15.6 mag. Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.6HxenwoelC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=9602, bad_region=1, passed=106300
Got 106300 stars (including 96569 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 106300 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 106300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 106300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 106300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.745 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.617 n_q1=1335 n_q2=855 n_q3=1439 n_q4=1282 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.475
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4911 N_valid=4911 bias_ra_arcsec=0.047 bias_dec_arcsec=0.014 median_sep_arcsec=0.431 p95_sep_arcsec=2.628 n_q1=1335 n_q2=855 n_q3=1439 n_q4=1282 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits -region wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.I4hMCcJQnO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=40, blended=10122, bad_region=1, passed=109375
Got 109375 stars (including 99118 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 109375 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109375 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109375 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109375 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.658 n_q1=1293 n_q2=1468 n_q3=897 n_q4=1251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.266
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4909 N_valid=4909 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.015 bias_dec_arcsec=0.023 median_sep_arcsec=0.362 p95_sep_arcsec=2.387 n_q1=1293 n_q2=1468 n_q3=897 n_q4=1251 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NDN8lPYxgP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=6438, bad_region=48, passed=69593
Got 69593 stars (including 63056 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69593 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=12.454 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.867 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.867 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=0.554 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.990 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.990 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=0.460 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.854 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.854 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4894 robust_rms_before=0.464 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.493 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.460 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.863 worst_region_rms_after=0.854 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.863 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.854
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.863 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.863 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.464 arcsec matched=4894
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.648 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.471 n_q1=1324 n_q2=804 n_q3=1581 n_q4=1185 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.347
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4894 N_valid=4894 bias_ra_arcsec=0.014 bias_dec_arcsec=0.019 median_sep_arcsec=0.380 p95_sep_arcsec=1.903 n_q1=1324 n_q2=804 n_q3=1581 n_q4=1185 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.D9YfjGib7C (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=6409, bad_region=47, passed=69390
Got 69390 stars (including 62877 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69390 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=12.716 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.644 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.644 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.583 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.012 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.012 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.458 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.871 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.871 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4898 robust_rms_before=0.458 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.488 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.458 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.888 worst_region_rms_after=0.871 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.888 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.871
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.888 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.888 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.458 arcsec matched=4898
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.646 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.456 n_q1=1331 n_q2=814 n_q3=1577 n_q4=1176 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.371
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4898 N_valid=4898 bias_ra_arcsec=0.008 bias_dec_arcsec=0.027 median_sep_arcsec=0.380 p95_sep_arcsec=1.925 n_q1=1331 n_q2=814 n_q3=1577 n_q4=1176 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-18-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0331.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_012001_TTUQ1b1x1_3929071_OMYoev13/wcs_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cep-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:55:17.09 +67:27:26.8: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:31:54.38 +68:17:13.0: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 20:24:48.94 +71:14:43.2: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 20:21:11.21 +66:42:29.0: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:40:10.97 +65:05:01.3: 14.26 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 19:53:04.01 +73:11:53.6: 14.47 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:35:26.92 +69:43:41.3: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 20:02:15.00 +73:04:20.7: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:39:33.25 +67:30:53.5: 14.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:20:19.88 +74:41:52.3: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 19:53:04.01 +73:11:53.6: 13.54 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:39:33.25 +67:30:53.5: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:35:26.92 +69:43:41.3: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 20:02:15.00 +73:04:20.7: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:31:54.38 +68:17:13.0: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 20:24:48.94 +71:14:43.2: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:04.01 +73:11:53.6: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7793 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:55:17.09 +67:27:26.8: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:39:33.25 +67:30:53.5: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0459 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:40:10.97 +65:05:01.3: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:48.94 +71:14:43.2: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8623 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:35:26.92 +69:43:41.3: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7705 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:02:15.00 +73:04:20.7: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4202 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:55:17.09 +67:27:26.8: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1087 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:31:54.38 +68:17:13.0: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0773 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:40:10.97 +65:05:01.3: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0572 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:20:19.88 +74:41:52.3: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:20:19.88 +74:41:52.3: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7653 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 20:21:11.21 +66:42:29.0: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:11.21 +66:42:29.0: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6969 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:09:09.97 +68:53:51.6: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 20:03:25.92 +72:11:53.8: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:51:03.73 +66:54:56.4: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 20:00:39.02 +74:04:20.9: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 20:28:47.15 +65:34:08.4: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 19:52:14.85 +73:50:39.9: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:49:15.69 +67:47:33.6: 13.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:32:13.76 +64:30:36.8: 12.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:09:09.97 +68:53:51.6: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:57:26.31 +67:09:21.8: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:51:03.73 +66:54:56.4: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:09:09.97 +68:53:51.6: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5314 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 20:03:25.92 +72:11:53.8: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:49:15.69 +67:47:33.6: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 20:00:39.02 +74:04:20.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:51:03.73 +66:54:56.4: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2759 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:39.02 +74:04:20.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 20:28:47.15 +65:34:08.4: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:25.92 +72:11:53.8: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9595 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 19:52:14.85 +73:50:39.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:14.85 +73:50:39.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:49:15.69 +67:47:33.6: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5637 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:47.15 +65:34:08.4: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1459 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:57:26.31 +67:09:21.8: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:32:13.76 +64:30:36.8: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:57:26.31 +67:09:21.8: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9567 delta=0.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:32:13.76 +64:30:36.8: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0446 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 23:20:02.97 +72:22:32.0: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 20:17:56.50 +67:01:46.3: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 23:20:02.97 +72:22:32.0: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:54:47.60 +69:15:29.8: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:20:02.97 +72:22:32.0: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2819 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 23:04:01.73 +70:48:43.8: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:35:09.51 +63:51:50.8: 14.53 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:35:09.51 +63:51:50.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:35:09.51 +63:51:50.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:59:53.73 +68:44:56.6: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:44:06.76 +64:02:12.7: 14.49 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:21:29.12 +64:14:36.3: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 20:17:56.50 +67:01:46.3: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:56.50 +67:01:46.3: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1016 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:54:47.60 +69:15:29.8: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 23:04:01.73 +70:48:43.8: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:04:01.73 +70:48:43.8: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6124 delta=-0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:44:06.76 +64:02:12.7: 14.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:59:53.73 +68:44:56.6: 14.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:44:03.35 +63:51:49.1: 14.77 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:44:06.76 +64:02:12.7: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9820 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:59:53.73 +68:44:56.6: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0737 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:21:29.12 +64:14:36.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:21:29.12 +64:14:36.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:43:44.51 +65:05:38.9: 15.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:44:03.35 +63:51:49.1: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:44:03.35 +63:51:49.1: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1443 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:57:56.44 +72:05:55.3: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:38:37.67 +64:17:44.1: 14.59 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 23:01:47.66 +70:24:25.7: 14.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:44:45.27 +64:32:40.8: 14.87 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:43:44.51 +65:05:38.9: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:43:44.51 +65:05:38.9: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1902 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:48:41.94 +65:52:38.3: 14.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:40:20.94 +63:42:40.6: 14.66 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:57:56.44 +72:05:55.3: 14.71 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:40:20.94 +63:42:40.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:40:20.94 +63:42:40.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:57:56.44 +72:05:55.3: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0786 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 23:01:47.66 +70:24:25.7: 14.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:47.66 +70:24:25.7: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2490 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:38:37.67 +64:17:44.1: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:38:37.67 +64:17:44.1: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1276 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:44:45.27 +64:32:40.8: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:44:45.27 +64:32:40.8: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1941 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:54:57.00 +66:51:37.2: 14.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:38:23.03 +64:18:50.3: 14.81 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:48:41.94 +65:52:38.3: 14.65 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:48:41.94 +65:52:38.3: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2028 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:43:31.20 +64:40:57.3: 14.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:54:57.00 +66:51:37.2: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:38:23.03 +64:18:50.3: 14.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:54:57.00 +66:51:37.2: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2480 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:38:23.03 +64:18:50.3: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3225 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:35:04.56 +63:48:54.1: 14.42 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:35:47.46 +64:00:16.9: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:35:04.56 +63:48:54.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:35:04.56 +63:48:54.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 23:15:32.44 +71:55:41.1: 14.52 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:41:41.81 +63:38:11.8: 14.84 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:36:31.95 +66:22:23.4: 15.17 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:43:31.20 +64:40:57.3: 14.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:43:31.20 +64:40:57.3: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2479 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:41:41.81 +63:38:11.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:41:41.81 +63:38:11.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:50:08.46 +68:37:37.3: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:35:47.46 +64:00:16.9: 14.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:35:47.46 +64:00:16.9: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5017 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 23:15:32.44 +71:55:41.1: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:32.44 +71:55:41.1: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2623 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:36:31.95 +66:22:23.4: 15.29 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:36:31.95 +66:22:23.4: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3647 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:19:01.83 +70:17:24.8: 14.91 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:50:08.46 +68:37:37.3: 15.28 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:33:04.64 +63:59:42.6: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:50:08.46 +68:37:37.3: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3391 delta=0.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:55:34.03 +67:36:37.8: 14.80 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:36:23.24 +65:04:26.1: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:53:18.62 +71:36:46.3: 15.26 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:19:01.83 +70:17:24.8: 14.93 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:19:01.83 +70:17:24.8: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5189 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:33:04.64 +63:59:42.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:33:04.64 +63:59:42.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 20:56:02.82 +74:13:42.5: 15.31 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:55:34.03 +67:36:37.8: 14.75 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:55:34.03 +67:36:37.8: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4184 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:53:18.62 +71:36:46.3: 15.17 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:36:23.24 +65:04:26.1: 15.03 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:53:18.62 +71:36:46.3: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4942 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:36:23.24 +65:04:26.1: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4646 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 19:58:26.71 +73:40:16.7: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 20:56:02.82 +74:13:42.5: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:02.82 +74:13:42.5: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.6164 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:28:35.33 +67:19:04.6: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 19:58:26.71 +73:40:16.7: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:26.71 +73:40:16.7: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9652 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:34:15.25 +65:28:10.8: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:28:35.33 +67:19:04.6: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:28:35.33 +67:19:04.6: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6185 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:52:21.84 +67:18:08.9: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:34:15.25 +65:28:10.8: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:34:15.25 +65:28:10.8: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4524 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:18:26.37 +67:05:53.8: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:52:21.84 +67:18:08.9: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 19:53:59.06 +73:05:30.3: 14.26 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:52:21.84 +67:18:08.9: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2306 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:49:51.31 +68:31:22.6: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:18:26.37 +67:05:53.8: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:18:26.37 +67:05:53.8: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9959 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 19:53:59.06 +73:05:30.3: 14.12 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:53:59.06 +73:05:30.3: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1787 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:49:51.31 +68:31:22.6: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:49:51.31 +68:31:22.6: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3837 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:23:25.01 +69:08:58.3: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:57:16.88 +71:39:22.3: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:35:42.56 +68:39:07.1: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:23:25.01 +69:08:58.3: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:23:25.01 +69:08:58.3: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5208 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:57:16.88 +71:39:22.3: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 22:57:16.88 +71:39:22.3: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7696 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 20:03:10.13 +71:10:43.7: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:35:42.56 +68:39:07.1: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:35:42.56 +68:39:07.1: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9924 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 20:03:10.13 +71:10:43.7: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:10.13 +71:10:43.7: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9441 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 22:35:28.04 +64:59:41.8: 14.38 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 22:35:28.04 +64:59:41.8: 14.29 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:35:28.04 +64:59:41.8: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.7066 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 23:02:16.05 +72:09:24.7: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 23:02:16.05 +72:09:24.7: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:02:16.05 +72:09:24.7: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.1011 delta=2.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_04-26-45_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0309.fits at 21:44:28.82 +73:38:03.6: 8.41 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-57-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 21:44:28.82 +73:38:03.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:44:28.82 +73:38:03.6: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131716.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05486.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out100239.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11388.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16234.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53189.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70686.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70913.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99138.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 444s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130868_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 130868_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130871_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 130871_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130873_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 130873_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130875_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 130875_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130882_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 130882_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130893_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 130893_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130896_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 130896_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130900_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 130900_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130911_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 130911_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130931_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 130931_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130932_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 130932_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:46:25.48 +64:48:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130947_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 130947_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130949_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 130949_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130950_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 130950_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:38:01.50 +69:22:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130953_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 130953_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130955_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 130955_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130956_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 130956_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130957_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 130957_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130960_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 130960_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:51:30.26 +69:19:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130965_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 130965_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130969_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 130969_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131100_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131100_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131102_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131102_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:36:38.60 +68:17:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131142_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131142_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131247_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131247_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:58:08.59 +66:00:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131415_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131415_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131423_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131423_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:29:06.08 +69:25:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131507_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131507_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:51:24.55 +71:47:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131626_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131626_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:24:11.08 +65:10:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131634_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131634_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131716_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131716_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:54:47.60 +69:15:29.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#esa_tap#, MAG_MEAN=13.75, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.73)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.809 2225479708640587008 343.69961796078 +69.25764398851 14.1920 12.2723 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.809#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131722_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131722_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131732_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131732_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:52:17.55 +67:59:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131802_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131802_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131817_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131817_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131819_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131819_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131849_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131849_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:50:34.02 +66:42:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131877_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131877_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131889_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131889_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:50:02.78 +66:14:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131929_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131929_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131936_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131936_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131945_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131945_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131948_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131948_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131964_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 131964_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132008_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 132008_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:04.17 +71:40:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132009_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 132009_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132014_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 132014_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132055_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 132055_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132065_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 132065_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132088_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 132088_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132090_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 132090_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132096_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 132096_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132109_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 132109_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132111_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 132111_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132129_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 132129_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132131_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 132131_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132135_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 132135_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132139_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 132139_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132163_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 132163_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132248_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 132248_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132272_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 132272_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132288_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 132288_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37356_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 37356_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02759_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 02759_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68824_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 68824_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60618_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 60618_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:22:18.94 +64:29:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64861_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 64861_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69119_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 69119_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17367_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 17367_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:36:12.16 +72:04:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99138_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
Preparing report for the candidate 99138_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120175_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 120175_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:48:13.36 +69:58:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118289_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 118289_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:42:54.00 +65:58:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100239_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
Preparing report for the candidate 100239_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117348_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 117348_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:19:41.43 +65:50:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05486_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
Preparing report for the candidate 05486_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10905_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 10905_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:54.91 +73:05:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70686_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
Preparing report for the candidate 70686_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99419_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 99419_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:09:22.45 +67:29:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21940_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21940_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:54:53.25 +72:10:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74660_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 74660_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:29:09.97 +66:13:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35542_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 35542_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:40:59.25 +69:46:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53189_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
Preparing report for the candidate 53189_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16234_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
Preparing report for the candidate 16234_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70913_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
Preparing report for the candidate 70913_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17152_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 17152_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:10.67 +71:59:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21367_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 21367_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61791_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 61791_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:57:34.70 +65:02:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25904_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 25904_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:27:31.47 +71:48:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87616_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 87616_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100630_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 100630_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:46:12.38 +67:38:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11388_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
Preparing report for the candidate 11388_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11795_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 11795_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:02:06.95 +73:25:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10006_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332
The candidate 10006_fd_Cep-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-19-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332 did not pass the final checks
