######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=esa_tap (lib/gaia_dr2_cone_search.sh -> ESA Gaia Archive TAP service)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Cet-11-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-11-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-11-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 974441 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 974441 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits_preview.png'
Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits

renamed 'Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits_preview.png'
Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1654.6390
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 511.5033
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1589.6895
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 523.4298
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1587.2623
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 522.5603
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 0.960747
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 12.1499996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 12.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-02T22:47:41.1764254' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-03T04:47:41.1764254' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61347.1997821298 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-03T04:47:51.0800394' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61347.1998967594 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 26.6698504665829 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -17.9998517921192 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 36.5727777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 162.760555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.67538101299581 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '01 46 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20687 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20687 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 12.1499996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 12.1499996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 72.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 897.9 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 12.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 155.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 10.400832 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/d_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits :)
Spent 0.546133 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/d_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 12.1099996566772 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 12.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-02T22:48:27.7195648' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-03T04:48:27.7195648' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61347.2003208217 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-03T04:48:37.6223207' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61347.2004354396 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 26.6698504647817 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -17.999851769856 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 36.62 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 162.980555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.6735323658948 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '01 46 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20687 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20687 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 12.1099996566772 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 12.1099996566772 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 72.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 897.9 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 12.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 155.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 10.400832 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/d_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits :)
Spent 0.594601 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/d_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits

fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.69989787
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:41.266 -17:59:55.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65
Second-epoch image center 01:46:41.266 -17:59:55.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0043 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:41.901 -17:59:06.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65
Second-epoch image center 01:46:41.901 -17:59:06.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0149 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:46:41.266 -17:59:55.37
Second-epoch second image center 01:46:41.901 -17:59:06.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01368 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IdKfvOHiaf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VTzk8wSY3O
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DVfoIZB1XT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.X7hL2wMBDG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 3748 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.1303 to 35.1139 deg, Dec -23.2882 to -12.6120 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.1303 to 35.1139 deg, Dec -23.2882 to -12.6120 deg
Loaded 4115 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2743 out of 2866 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2866 out of 3748 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.863300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.863300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.92
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 3748 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.1303 to 35.1139 deg, Dec -23.2882 to -12.6120 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.1303 to 35.1139 deg, Dec -23.2882 to -12.6120 deg
Loaded 4115 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2743 out of 2866 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2866 out of 3748 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 4329 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.3267 to 35.1802 deg, Dec -23.3270 to -12.4424 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.3267 to 35.1802 deg, Dec -23.3270 to -12.4424 deg
Loaded 4183 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3033 out of 3123 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3123 out of 4329 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits (aperture=5.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
2.1 pix Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
15.2 mag. Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.IdKfvOHiaf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=374, bad_region=898, passed=3748
Got 3748 stars (including 2571 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2528 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2528 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2528 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2528 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2528 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2528 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2528 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 2528 stars left (next iteration limit 2780)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits N_match=2528 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=748 n_q2=506 n_q3=779 n_q4=495 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2528 N_valid=2528 bias_ra_arcsec=0.006 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.006 median_sep_arcsec=0.319 p95_sep_arcsec=0.824 n_q1=748 n_q2=506 n_q3=779 n_q4=495 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.VTzk8wSY3O (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=326, bad_region=1019, passed=4329
Got 4329 stars (including 3046 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4329 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 2977 stars left (next iteration limit 3274)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits N_match=2977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.229 n_q1=929 n_q2=528 n_q3=973 n_q4=547 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2977 N_valid=2977 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.226 p95_sep_arcsec=0.615 n_q1=929 n_q2=528 n_q3=973 n_q4=547 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits -region wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DVfoIZB1XT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=291, bad_region=945, passed=4148
Got 4148 stars (including 2975 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4148 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 2923 stars left (next iteration limit 3215)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2923 robust_rms=7.913 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.074 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.074 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2923 robust_rms=0.534 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.111 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.111 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2923 robust_rms=0.326 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.441 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.441 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2923 robust_rms_before=1.074 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.300 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.326 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.397 worst_region_rms_after=0.441 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.067 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.441
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.397 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.397 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.300 arcsec matched=2923
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits N_match=2923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=909 n_q2=590 n_q3=901 n_q4=523 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2923 N_valid=2923 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.713 bias_dec_arcsec=0.545 median_sep_arcsec=0.987 p95_sep_arcsec=1.884 n_q1=909 n_q2=590 n_q3=901 n_q4=523 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.X7hL2wMBDG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=294, bad_region=949, passed=4161
Got 4161 stars (including 2985 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4161 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3395 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3395 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3395 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 2933 stars left (next iteration limit 3226)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2933 robust_rms=7.846 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.279 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.279 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2933 robust_rms=0.520 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.878 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.878 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2933 robust_rms=0.317 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.409 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.409 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2933 robust_rms_before=1.062 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.294 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.317 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.373 worst_region_rms_after=0.409 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.037 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.409
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.373 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.373 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.294 arcsec matched=2933
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits N_match=2933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=921 n_q2=586 n_q3=901 n_q4=525 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2933 N_valid=2933 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.721 bias_dec_arcsec=0.515 median_sep_arcsec=0.980 p95_sep_arcsec=1.803 n_q1=921 n_q2=586 n_q3=901 n_q4=525 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits sigma_overall=0.400 worst_q_ratio=1.090
ref2=Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits sigma_overall=0.265 worst_q_ratio=1.304
new1=fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.179
new2=fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.106
reference average sigma_overall=0.3325 worst_q_ratio=1.197
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028_astrometric_residuals.png (2528 matched stars from wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086_astrometric_residuals.png (2977 matched stars from wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252_astrometric_residuals.png (2923 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253_astrometric_residuals.png (2933 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:41.266 -17:59:55.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65
Second-epoch image center 01:46:41.266 -17:59:55.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0043 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:41.901 -17:59:06.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65
Second-epoch image center 01:46:41.901 -17:59:06.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0149 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:46:41.266 -17:59:55.37
Second-epoch second image center 01:46:41.901 -17:59:06.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01368 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.92evbUVUqj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.54yrZC2oqW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gg9g7UcBk1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6H91TY7oXn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 21033 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.1142 to 35.1618 deg, Dec -23.2881 to -12.5807 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.1142 to 35.1618 deg, Dec -23.2881 to -12.5807 deg
Loaded 4142 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3196 out of 3400 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3400 out of 21033 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.726550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.726550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.61
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 21033 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.1142 to 35.1618 deg, Dec -23.2881 to -12.5807 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.1142 to 35.1618 deg, Dec -23.2881 to -12.5807 deg
Loaded 4142 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3196 out of 3400 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3400 out of 21033 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 23371 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.3056 to 35.3091 deg, Dec -23.3269 to -12.4103 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.3056 to 35.3091 deg, Dec -23.3269 to -12.4103 deg
Loaded 4230 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3215 out of 3388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3388 out of 23371 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
2.0 pix Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
15.4 mag. Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.92evbUVUqj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=795, bad_region=4192, passed=21031
Got 21031 stars (including 16212 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21031 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4854 stars left (next iteration limit 5339)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits N_match=4854 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=1466 n_q2=935 n_q3=1537 n_q4=916 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4854 N_valid=4854 bias_ra_arcsec=0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.009 median_sep_arcsec=0.340 p95_sep_arcsec=0.821 n_q1=1466 n_q2=935 n_q3=1537 n_q4=916 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.54yrZC2oqW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=721, bad_region=4135, passed=23360
Got 23360 stars (including 18613 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23360 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5340)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1610 n_q2=901 n_q3=1501 n_q4=843 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.222
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4855 N_valid=4855 bias_ra_arcsec=0.008 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.246 p95_sep_arcsec=0.619 n_q1=1610 n_q2=901 n_q3=1501 n_q4=843 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits -region wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.gg9g7UcBk1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=680, bad_region=4308, passed=21686
Got 21686 stars (including 16844 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21686 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4812 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18435 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4812 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18435 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18435 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4806 stars left (next iteration limit 5286)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4806 robust_rms=7.695 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.848 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.848 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4806 robust_rms=0.534 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.162 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.162 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4806 robust_rms=0.352 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.456 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.456 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4806 robust_rms_before=1.068 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.326 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.352 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.431 worst_region_rms_after=0.456 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.076 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.456
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.431 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.431 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.326 arcsec matched=4806
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits N_match=4806 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.310 n_q1=1509 n_q2=918 n_q3=1482 n_q4=897 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.153
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4806 N_valid=4806 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.695 bias_dec_arcsec=0.536 median_sep_arcsec=0.977 p95_sep_arcsec=1.846 n_q1=1509 n_q2=918 n_q3=1482 n_q4=897 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.6H91TY7oXn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=694, bad_region=4288, passed=21656
Got 21656 stars (including 16808 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4809 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4801 robust_rms=7.750 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.024 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.024 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4801 robust_rms=0.532 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.016 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.016 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4801 robust_rms=0.340 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.439 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.439 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4801 robust_rms_before=1.054 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.312 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.340 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.398 worst_region_rms_after=0.439 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.061 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.439
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.398 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.398 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.312 arcsec matched=4801
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=1508 n_q2=922 n_q3=1478 n_q4=893 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4801 N_valid=4801 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.708 bias_dec_arcsec=0.511 median_sep_arcsec=0.967 p95_sep_arcsec=1.737 n_q1=1508 n_q2=922 n_q3=1478 n_q4=893 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:42:05.56 -13:55:28.5: 14.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:21:55.24 -16:22:14.0: 14.17 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:27:22.02 -20:19:45.9: 14.00 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:23:52.07 -17:10:47.2: 12.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:19:49.28 -20:31:22.7: 14.09 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:26:11.83 -21:46:26.3: 14.54 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:45:09.53 -20:03:07.3: 10.26 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:23:11.79 -17:13:19.6: 13.87 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:27:26.23 -19:33:43.8: 14.61 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:24:31.23 -17:08:09.7: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:26:11.83 -21:46:26.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:21:55.24 -16:22:14.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:27:22.02 -20:19:45.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:26:11.83 -21:46:26.3: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.2378 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:55.24 -16:22:14.0: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1436 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:45:09.53 -20:03:07.3: 10.30 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:27:26.23 -19:33:43.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:19:49.28 -20:31:22.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:42:05.56 -13:55:28.5: 14.27 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:23:52.07 -17:10:47.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:27:22.02 -20:19:45.9: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0561 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.28 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:27:26.23 -19:33:43.8: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.3729 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:49.28 -20:31:22.7: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0367 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:23:11.79 -17:13:19.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:45:09.53 -20:03:07.3: ref_mag=10.28 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5451 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:42:05.56 -13:55:28.5: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2202 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:24:31.23 -17:08:09.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:23:52.07 -17:10:47.2: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3766 delta=-0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:23:11.79 -17:13:19.6: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0171 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:24:31.23 -17:08:09.7: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0866 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:21:30.02 -21:18:07.7: 14.80 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:21:23.83 -18:48:07.6: 14.67 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:22:10.30 -20:05:36.5: 14.74 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:21:02.56 -21:30:14.4: 15.08 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:23:45.22 -20:14:55.8: 14.88 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:21:30.02 -21:18:07.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.24
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:30.02 -21:18:07.7: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.24 new_mean_mag=14.4640 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:21:23.83 -18:48:07.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:23.83 -18:48:07.6: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.4474 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:22:10.30 -20:05:36.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:23:45.22 -20:14:55.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:22:10.30 -20:05:36.5: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.4890 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:21:02.56 -21:30:14.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.24
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:23:45.22 -20:14:55.8: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.24 new_mean_mag=14.3017 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.32
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:02.56 -21:30:14.4: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.32 new_mean_mag=14.4688 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37145_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 37145_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 03.19990 | 2461347.69990 | 14.16 | 01:42:05.50 -13:55:28.6 | 4129 5664 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 03.20044 | 2461347.70044 | 14.31 | 01:42:05.61 -13:55:28.3 | 4127 5655 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37150_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 37150_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 03.19990 | 2461347.69990 | 10.43 | 01:45:09.43 -20:03:07.2 | 4564 1956 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 03.20044 | 2461347.70044 | 10.75 | 01:45:09.62 -20:03:07.5 | 4563 1947 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37235_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 37235_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 03.19990 | 2461347.69990 | 13.09 | 01:24:31.23 -17:08:09.7 | 1580 3691 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 03.20044 | 2461347.70044 | 13.09 | 01:24:31.24 -17:08:09.8 | 1578 3683 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37276_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 37276_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 03.19990 | 2461347.69990 | 13.38 | 01:23:52.08 -17:10:47.3 | 1485 3662 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 03.20044 | 2461347.70044 | 13.37 | 01:23:52.07 -17:10:47.2 | 1484 3654 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37339_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 37339_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 03.19990 | 2461347.69990 | 13.96 | 01:19:49.31 -20:31:22.7 | 0952 1611 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 03.20044 | 2461347.70044 | 14.15 | 01:19:49.24 -20:31:22.8 | 0951 1603 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37343_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 37343_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 03.19990 | 2461347.69990 | 14.04 | 01:27:22.05 -20:19:45.2 | 2033 1762 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 03.20044 | 2461347.70044 | 14.07 | 01:27:22.00 -20:19:46.7 | 2031 1753 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37376_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 37376_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 03.19990 | 2461347.69990 | 14.11 | 01:23:11.77 -17:13:19.6 | 1388 3634 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 03.20044 | 2461347.70044 | 13.95 | 01:23:11.80 -17:13:19.6 | 1386 3626 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37404_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 37404_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 03.19990 | 2461347.69990 | 14.14 | 01:21:55.29 -16:22:15.1 | 1187 4147 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 03.20044 | 2461347.70044 | 14.14 | 01:21:55.19 -16:22:12.8 | 1185 4140 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37407_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 37407_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 03.19990 | 2461347.69990 | 14.26 | 01:26:11.80 -21:46:25.9 | 1883 0877 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 03.20044 | 2461347.70044 | 14.21 | 01:26:11.85 -21:46:26.7 | 1881 0869 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37412_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 37412_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 03.19990 | 2461347.69990 | 14.27 | 01:27:26.24 -19:33:44.2 | 2034 2228 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 03.20044 | 2461347.70044 | 14.53 | 01:27:26.21 -19:33:43.4 | 2032 2220 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37428_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 37428_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 03.19990 | 2461347.69990 | 14.33 | 01:23:45.28 -20:14:55.7 | 1514 1797 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 03.20044 | 2461347.70044 | 14.28 | 01:23:45.16 -20:14:56.0 | 1512 1788 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37431_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 37431_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 03.19990 | 2461347.69990 | 14.37 | 01:21:30.10 -21:18:06.7 | 1207 1144 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 03.20044 | 2461347.70044 | 14.62 | 01:21:29.94 -21:18:08.8 | 1205 1135 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37433_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 37433_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 03.19990 | 2461347.69990 | 14.39 | 01:22:10.36 -20:05:35.7 | 1284 1884 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 03.20044 | 2461347.70044 | 14.73 | 01:22:10.25 -20:05:37.3 | 1282 1876 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37434_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 37434_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 03.19990 | 2461347.69990 | 14.38 | 01:21:02.50 -21:30:14.3 | 1144 1018 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 03.20044 | 2461347.70044 | 14.62 | 01:21:02.62 -21:30:14.4 | 1143 1010 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37450_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253
The candidate 37450_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 03.19990 | 2461347.69990 | 14.38 | 01:21:23.88 -18:48:07.9 | 1151 2667 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-47-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 03.20044 | 2461347.70044 | 14.55 | 01:21:23.78 -18:48:07.4 | 1149 2659 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_002621_TTUQ2b1x1_3103451_Rq28mO6d/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits |
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Cet-11-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461347.69989787 -observatory V36
14:43:36.88 -16:44:24.9 Mercury (5.2mag)
13:25:34.39 -13:38:52.4 Venus (-4.3mag)
09:29:12.44 +16:34:50.1 Mars (0.8mag)
09:47:00.65 +14:06:30.6 Jupiter (-2.0mag)
00:36:27.56 +01:00:50.2 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:09:03.57 +20:50:12.1 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:08:20.82 -00:38:12.0 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:28.00 -23:41:34.5 Pluto (14.5mag)
10:00:58.81 +11:36:17.7 Moon (-9.9mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Nov 3 00:32 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461347.69989787:
09:46:57.70 +14:06:48.4 Io (6.0mag)
09:46:55.30 +14:07:03.5 Europa (6.1mag)
09:47:15.53 +14:05:05.3 Ganymede (5.5mag)
09:47:29.44 +14:03:46.5 Callisto (6.8mag)
09:48:26.92 +14:16:08.0 Himalia (15.5mag)
09:46:59.03 +14:06:39.6 Thebe (16.3mag)
09:46:46.01 +14:31:30.8 Elara (17.4mag)
09:47:47.10 +13:34:06.7 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
09:44:02.96 +14:38:23.6 Carme (18.7mag)
00:36:35.77 +01:00:21.1 Titan (8.3mag)
00:36:29.52 +01:00:48.9 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:36:57.58 +01:01:26.7 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:36:15.70 +01:00:31.8 Hyperion (14.2mag)
00:34:40.82 +00:48:40.2 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Nov 3 00:32 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461347.69989787:
04:35:38.38 +17:23:02.7 JWST
13:00:02.72 +53:10:36.4 Chandra
06:21:12.75 +18:57:51.3 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Nov 3 00:32 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461347.69989787 -observatory V36
03:33:48.73 +19:57:07.6 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
07:46:34.20 +38:22:09.2 17.9mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill)
07:46:39.56 +38:21:56.2 17.9mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill)
07:45:58.14 +38:22:15.8 17.9mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill)
05:01:58.10 +39:08:47.4 17.8mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski)
18:47:50.37 -32:53:02.4 15.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:45:17.40 -73:53:33.5 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:11:32.34 +35:18:10.2 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
07:35:41.72 +25:20:21.7 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:08:33.35 +38:30:01.4 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:36:52.10 +40:52:26.2 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:43:07.90 -13:33:33.4 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
14:15:02.47 -04:34:16.4 16.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
20:13:58.12 +53:13:31.8 15.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
13:07:23.43 +16:57:23.1 17.7mag A/2026 E1
16:01:05.93 -65:17:30.5 14.5mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
19:33:51.57 -05:21:59.0 17.1mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS)
23:29:24.11 +14:06:52.1 16.8mag 2P/Encke
23:25:47.68 -25:50:13.8 15.4mag 10P/Tempel
02:39:43.30 +30:41:02.6 16.3mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:26:01.70 -10:01:08.3 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:10:45.39 -09:01:35.7 15.8mag 65P/Gunn
08:00:02.58 +13:36:27.2 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels
08:59:06.36 +45:54:12.5 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
09:50:44.80 +05:40:33.2 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
12:26:28.61 +08:05:35.7 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
19:49:26.09 +14:21:26.5 10.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
11:11:43.71 -03:04:10.8 16.2mag 169P/NEAT
09:41:29.31 +23:30:26.2 18.0mag 186P/Garradd
03:10:54.54 +02:12:12.5 15.3mag 220P/McNaught
06:22:38.47 +49:43:55.9 15.6mag 260P/McNaught
07:56:16.10 +25:04:45.6 17.6mag 266P/Christensen
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.6K Nov 3 00:32 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92
10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27
21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82
01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9
01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88
00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77
22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42
01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3
18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23
21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83
03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75
04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52
09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93
02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85
02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61
22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56
15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.89 -10:37:05.90 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.05 15.79
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Nov 3 00:32 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag
00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag
01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag
17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag
09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag
00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag
04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag
05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag
05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Nov 3 00:32 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
07:41:25.037 +21:02:16.50 SN 2026afqs 2026-10-13.18 19.73
08:37:58.823 +12:32:25.90 SN 2026afqr 2026-10-17.23 19.93
04:51:17.403 -26:27:57.01 AT 2026afqq 2026-10-17.26 19.449
04:37:45.596 -24:04:12.02 AT 2026afqp 2026-10-17.26 19.535
01:25:03.389 -32:39:10.49 AT 2026afqo 2026-10-12.21 19.322
03:17:26.864 -15:58:34.85 AT 2026afqn 2026-10-17.30 19.375
17:53:52.220 +41:47:24.16 AT 2026afqm 2026-10-16.83 19.331
06:23:17.419 +70:33:15.10 SN 2026afql 2026-10-17.15 18.737
02:38:36.934 +41:55:58.84 AT 2026afqk 2026-10-17.04 19.369
05:26:14.588 -27:06:01.24 AT 2026afqj 2026-10-17.29 19.31
02:01:09.758 -36:18:14.69 AT 2026afqi 2026-10-12.26 19.361
09:44:49.328 +38:11:23.47 SN 2026afqh 2026-10-17.22 18.467
17:38:02.102 +55:52:14.30 AT 2026afqg 2026-10-16.84 19.253
02:35:38.526 -36:21:14.39 AT 2026afqf 2026-10-17.25 19.522
00:43:30.828 +41:26:55.48 AT 2026afqe 2026-10-17.57 18.61
00:25:27.859 +20:14:37.33 SN 2026afqd 2026-10-17.09 19.18
08:07:08.624 +06:16:20.09 SN 2026afqc 2026-10-11.25 19.94
04:47:31.739 +04:21:53.97 SN 2026afqb 2026-10-05.43 20.6842
03:07:45.440 -28:00:44.28 AT 2026afqa 2026-09-13.29 19.318
05:09:31.456 +75:44:45.10 AT 2026afpz 2026-10-11.55 19.477
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Nov 3 00:32 tns_transients_list.txt