This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.1807 2461347.6807 12.22 23:31:56.90 -08:40:54.6
73.68510 -63.66689 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.106 Dione -1 0 1 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:56.90 -08:40:54.6: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:56.90 -08:40:54.6: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.6807,12.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.1807 12.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.1807 2461347.6807 13.43 23:52:29.08 -10:04:59.8
80.94934 -68.00931 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.217 Eudora -1 0 1 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:29.08 -10:04:59.8: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:29.08 -10:04:59.8: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.6807,13.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.1807 13.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.1807 2461347.6807 13.80 00:01:49.23 -08:36:22.8
88.26786 -68.07297 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.906 Repsolda -1 -0 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:01:49.23 -08:36:22.8: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:01:49.23 -08:36:22.8: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.1807* 00 01 49.23 -08 36 22.8 13.8 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.6807,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.1807 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
First image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Last image: 2461347.68120362 03.11.2026 04:20:45.993 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5820
Objects passed selection criteria: 5811
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5179.75
Average stars matched: 4662.5 (90.014 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 231944 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Nov 2 23:08:51 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
First image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Last image: 2461347.68120362 03.11.2026 04:20:45.993 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 61
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 93 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27493
Objects passed selection criteria: 27433
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 25708.8
Average stars matched: 23265 (90.4945 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249876 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Nov 2 23:15:03 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.68014456
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.678 -10:00:08.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.678 -10:00:08.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0012 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.078 -09:59:27.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.078 -09:59:27.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0108 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:00.678 -10:00:08.91
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:00.078 -09:59:27.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01170 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nHomBwBviK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SEx4T4WZU7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TrzFfvAFQX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vtmtKLxWi3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.569700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.569700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.95
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.95
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=7.1)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3202 out of 3251 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3251 out of 4358 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
2.3 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
15.0 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nHomBwBviK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=0, passed=4374
Got 4374 stars (including 4092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0780, gap 8.0780 to 351.9535
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0777, gap 8.0777 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 3991 stars left (next iteration limit 4390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=3991 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1080 n_q2=969 n_q3=999 n_q4=943 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3991 N_valid=3991 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.020 bias_dec_arcsec=0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.307 p95_sep_arcsec=1.472 n_q1=1080 n_q2=969 n_q3=999 n_q4=943 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.SEx4T4WZU7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, bad_region=0, passed=4358
Got 4358 stars (including 4088 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0779, gap 8.0779 to 351.9535
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0776, gap 8.0776 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 3988 stars left (next iteration limit 4386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=3988 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1022 n_q2=971 n_q3=1079 n_q4=916 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.078
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3988 N_valid=3988 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.008 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.006 median_sep_arcsec=0.264 p95_sep_arcsec=1.131 n_q1=1022 n_q2=971 n_q3=1079 n_q4=916 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.TrzFfvAFQX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=368, bad_region=0, passed=6052
Got 6052 stars (including 5677 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6052 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7320 through 0 to 8.0445, gap 8.0445 to 351.7320
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 429 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6052 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7321 through 0 to 8.0450, gap 8.0450 to 351.7321
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 429 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6052 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6052 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=13.720 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.666 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.666 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.415 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.718 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.718 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.262 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.323 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.323 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4881 robust_rms_before=1.131 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.255 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.262 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.326 worst_region_rms_after=0.323 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.277 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.323
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.326 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.326 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.255 arcsec matched=4881
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=1172 n_q2=1287 n_q3=1197 n_q4=1225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.040
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4881 N_valid=4881 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.735 bias_dec_arcsec=0.529 median_sep_arcsec=1.070 p95_sep_arcsec=1.802 n_q1=1172 n_q2=1287 n_q3=1197 n_q4=1225 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vtmtKLxWi3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=349, bad_region=0, passed=6096
Got 6096 stars (including 5742 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6096 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7313 through 0 to 8.0607, gap 8.0607 to 351.7313
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.4 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7320 through 0 to 8.0600, gap 8.0600 to 351.7320
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.4 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=13.671 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.773 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.773 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.393 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.809 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.809 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.263 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.325 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.325 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4875 robust_rms_before=3.563 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.279 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.263 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.370 worst_region_rms_after=0.325 outer_annulus_rms_before=4.271 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.325
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.sip_refit.WelVX4/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.sip_refit.WelVX4/candidate.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.225 -09:59:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6096 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.sip_refit.WelVX4/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_322833.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.sip_refit.WelVX4/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.qFYfYC' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_322833.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 3.563 -> 0.263 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4875 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7319 through 0 to 8.0601, gap 8.0601 to 351.7319
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.4 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4691 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4691 pairs (4875 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4691 robust_rms=13.679 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.537 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.537 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4691 robust_rms=0.391 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.810 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.810 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4691 robust_rms=0.261 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.322 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.322 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4691 robust_rms_before=0.261 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.261 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.261 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.322 worst_region_rms_after=0.322 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.322 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.322
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.322 vs 0.322 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4691 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4691 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits N_match=4691 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.272 n_q1=1135 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1131 n_q4=1185 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.033
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4691 N_valid=4691 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=0.009 median_sep_arcsec=0.222 p95_sep_arcsec=0.605 n_q1=1135 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1131 n_q4=1185 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits sigma_overall=0.350 worst_q_ratio=1.109
ref2=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.078
new1=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits sigma_overall=0.264 worst_q_ratio=1.040
new2=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits sigma_overall=0.270 worst_q_ratio=1.033
reference average sigma_overall=0.3205 worst_q_ratio=1.0935
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021_astrometric_residuals.png (3991 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490_astrometric_residuals.png (3988 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213_astrometric_residuals.png (4881 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214_astrometric_residuals.png (4691 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.20 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:14:37.61 -07:49:20.9: 11.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:14:37.61 -07:49:20.9: 11.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:14:37.61 -07:49:20.9: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8841 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20251_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 20251_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:19:24.42 -08:51:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20307_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 20307_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00255_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 00255_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:02:07.42 -14:40:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.678 -10:00:08.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.678 -10:00:08.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0012 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.225 -09:59:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.225 -09:59:26.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0110 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:00.678 -10:00:08.91
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:00.225 -09:59:26.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01185 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.onLPbZuGnm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WbbxGEsjbk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kPf0IxHYbi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wf1nlXi5HA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.388800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.388800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.08
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.08
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=5.3)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 23415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4212 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3459 out of 3633 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 23415 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 49 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
2.2 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
15.1 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.onLPbZuGnm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=913, bad_region=0, passed=22729
Got 22729 stars (including 21779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22729 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9459 through 0 to 8.0985, gap 8.0985 to 351.9459
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9463 through 0 to 8.0982, gap 8.0982 to 351.9463
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5350)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1176 n_q4=1179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4864 N_valid=4864 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.007 median_sep_arcsec=0.320 p95_sep_arcsec=1.370 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1176 n_q4=1179 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WbbxGEsjbk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=831, bad_region=0, passed=23408
Got 23408 stars (including 22542 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23408 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9462 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9462
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9465 through 0 to 8.0899, gap 8.0899 to 351.9465
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5346)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1259 n_q2=1185 n_q3=1245 n_q4=1171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4860 N_valid=4860 bias_ra_arcsec=0.000 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.016 median_sep_arcsec=0.269 p95_sep_arcsec=1.063 n_q1=1259 n_q2=1185 n_q3=1245 n_q4=1171 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kPf0IxHYbi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1041, bad_region=48, passed=28819
Got 28819 stars (including 27689 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28819 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7027 through 0 to 8.0916, gap 8.0916 to 351.7027
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7027 through 0 to 8.0921, gap 8.0921 to 351.7027
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5352)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=13.778 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.816 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.816 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.419 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.748 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.748 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.259 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.322 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.322 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4866 robust_rms_before=1.137 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.255 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.259 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.333 worst_region_rms_after=0.322 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.278 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.322
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.333 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.333 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.255 arcsec matched=4866
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.275 n_q1=1196 n_q2=1282 n_q3=1187 n_q4=1201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.039
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4866 N_valid=4866 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.736 bias_dec_arcsec=0.544 median_sep_arcsec=1.079 p95_sep_arcsec=1.797 n_q1=1196 n_q2=1282 n_q3=1187 n_q4=1201 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wf1nlXi5HA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=991, bad_region=48, passed=28851
Got 28851 stars (including 27776 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28851 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7025 through 0 to 8.0775, gap 8.0775 to 351.7025
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7025 through 0 to 8.0774, gap 8.0774 to 351.7025
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5346)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=13.705 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.927 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.927 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=0.396 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.828 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.828 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=0.262 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.328 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.328 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4860 robust_rms_before=0.263 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.253 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.262 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.321 worst_region_rms_after=0.328 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.330 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.328
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.321 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.321 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.253 arcsec matched=4860
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.245 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=1195 n_q2=1273 n_q3=1189 n_q4=1203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.037
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4860 N_valid=4860 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=0.020 median_sep_arcsec=0.223 p95_sep_arcsec=0.656 n_q1=1195 n_q2=1273 n_q3=1189 n_q4=1203 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-19-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0213.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_223635_TTUQ1b1x1_4108571_Q67wmSys/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:48:06.69 -07:36:47.7: 12.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:59:45.78 -05:52:34.6: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:13:02.64 -05:59:51.6: 13.83 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:06:29.02 -13:25:13.5: 13.72 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:56.90 -08:40:54.6: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:40.32 -06:46:25.1: 14.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:09.58 -08:03:52.3: 13.84 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:48.92 -06:31:08.0: 13.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:51:01.64 -05:38:20.2: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:29.08 -10:04:59.8: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:40.32 -06:46:25.1: 14.00 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:09.58 -08:03:52.3: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:06:29.02 -13:25:13.5: 13.99 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:56.90 -08:40:54.6: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:51:01.64 -05:38:20.2: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:09.58 -08:03:52.3: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2693 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:40.32 -06:46:25.1: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2285 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:13:02.64 -05:59:51.6: 13.97 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:29.02 -13:25:13.5: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0626 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:51:01.64 -05:38:20.2: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3987 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:59:45.78 -05:52:34.6: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:48:06.69 -07:36:47.7: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:29.08 -10:04:59.8: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:02.64 -05:59:51.6: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3507 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:59:45.78 -05:52:34.6: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5685 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:06.69 -07:36:47.7: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2596 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:48.92 -06:31:08.0: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:48.92 -06:31:08.0: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3546 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:29:34.43 -05:21:34.8: 13.73 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:01:49.23 -08:36:22.8: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:00:47.25 -09:01:10.7: 13.66 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:18.90 -09:31:12.3: 13.88 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:30:42.93 -13:59:26.2: 14.11 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:29:59.02 -14:20:26.2: 14.27 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:01:49.23 -08:36:22.8: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:00:47.25 -09:01:10.7: 13.82 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:36.11 -10:20:02.8: 13.94 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:47.25 -09:01:10.7: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1158 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:18.90 -09:31:12.3: 13.82 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:09:28.89 -08:29:46.7: 13.72 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:18.90 -09:31:12.3: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9999 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:29:34.43 -05:21:34.8: 13.61 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:30:42.93 -13:59:26.2: 14.43 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:34.43 -05:21:34.8: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9772 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:29:59.02 -14:20:26.2: 14.26 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:42.93 -13:59:26.2: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8871 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:59.02 -14:20:26.2: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0552 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:36.11 -10:20:02.8: 13.97 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:36.11 -10:20:02.8: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0020 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:09:28.89 -08:29:46.7: 13.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:09:28.89 -08:29:46.7: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1143 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:55:36.46 -05:54:19.2: 14.36 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:44:10.49 -06:10:13.8: 14.42 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:59.39 -08:18:32.3: 14.49 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:55:36.46 -05:54:19.2: 14.49 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:29:12.70 -09:31:33.6: 14.23 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:36.46 -05:54:19.2: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3273 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:30:06.47 -04:53:28.8: 14.45 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:42:24.54 -06:00:19.8: 13.60 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:36:36.67 -07:03:29.6: 14.60 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:44:10.49 -06:10:13.8: 14.17 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:44:10.49 -06:10:13.8: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4086 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:59.39 -08:18:32.3: 14.39 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:59.39 -08:18:32.3: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3385 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:29:12.70 -09:31:33.6: 14.12 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:12.70 -09:31:33.6: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2679 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:30:06.47 -04:53:28.8: 14.89 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:06.47 -04:53:28.8: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.3248 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:36:36.67 -07:03:29.6: 14.40 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:36.67 -07:03:29.6: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3759 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:42:24.54 -06:00:19.8: 13.84 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:42:24.54 -06:00:19.8: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1409 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:30:06.61 -08:21:04.6: 14.60 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:29:11.03 -10:32:26.4: 14.47 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:29:31.83 -07:35:34.3: 14.47 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:28:52.10 -09:08:40.0: 14.34 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:30:06.61 -08:21:04.6: 14.25 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:29:09.84 -09:15:45.8: 14.02 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:06.61 -08:21:04.6: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3878 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:25:58.17 -14:07:51.0: 14.51 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:29:11.03 -10:32:26.4: 14.85 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:29:31.83 -07:35:34.3: 14.36 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:19:57.95 -11:38:24.1: 14.25 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:11.03 -10:32:26.4: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.3530 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:28:52.10 -09:08:40.0: 14.26 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:31.83 -07:35:34.3: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3143 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:52.10 -09:08:40.0: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3492 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:29:09.84 -09:15:45.8: 14.16 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:09.84 -09:15:45.8: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3877 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:25:58.17 -14:07:51.0: 14.54 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:58.17 -14:07:51.0: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2461 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:19:57.95 -11:38:24.1: 14.48 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:19:57.95 -11:38:24.1: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1916 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:44.75 -14:42:49.5: 13.99 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:26:36.86 -14:52:39.6: 14.12 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:30:57.07 -14:57:28.9: 14.34 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:26:13.67 -14:49:01.1: 14.76 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:44.75 -14:42:49.5: 14.37 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:44.75 -14:42:49.5: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1872 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:35.68 -10:30:37.1: 14.42 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:26:27.25 -15:06:40.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:37:58.01 -14:09:52.3: 14.22 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:26:36.86 -14:52:39.6: 14.29 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:30:57.07 -14:57:28.9: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:26:13.67 -14:49:01.1: 14.30 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:36.86 -14:52:39.6: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1271 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:57.07 -14:57:28.9: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.0803 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:13.67 -14:49:01.1: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1593 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:26:27.25 -15:06:40.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:27.25 -15:06:40.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:35.68 -10:30:37.1: 14.19 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:35.68 -10:30:37.1: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2961 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:37:58.01 -14:09:52.3: 14.30 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:58.01 -14:09:52.3: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2688 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:31:00.18 -12:57:12.1: 14.65 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:35.82 -14:31:52.3: 14.89 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:25:50.89 -14:34:53.5: 14.75 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:30:28.44 -14:24:28.1: 14.13 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:25:23.28 -10:05:46.4: 14.56 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:31:00.18 -12:57:12.1: 14.53 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:30:28.44 -14:24:28.1: 14.85 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:00.18 -12:57:12.1: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.1967 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:28.44 -14:24:28.1: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3329 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:35.82 -14:31:52.3: 14.95 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:25:50.89 -14:34:53.5: 14.59 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:35.82 -14:31:52.3: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.3623 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:50.89 -14:34:53.5: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.2904 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:25:23.28 -10:05:46.4: 14.58 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:23.28 -10:05:46.4: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3709 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32518.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32807.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32957.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 36s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32394_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 32394_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32396_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 32396_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32397_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 32397_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32399_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 32399_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32427_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 32427_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:19:24.43 -08:51:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32518_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
Preparing report for the candidate 32518_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32552_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 32552_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:05:10.82 -05:41:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32558_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 32558_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32621_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 32621_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:10:28.11 -06:02:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32697_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 32697_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32730_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 32730_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32737_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 32737_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32807_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
Preparing report for the candidate 32807_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32957_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
Preparing report for the candidate 32957_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33008_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33008_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33054_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33054_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33059_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33059_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33075_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33075_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33086_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33086_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33090_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33090_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33091_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33091_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33118_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33118_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33138_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33138_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33158_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33158_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33160_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33160_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33161_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33161_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33163_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33163_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33172_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33172_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33177_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33177_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33182_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33182_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33183_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33183_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33189_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33189_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33190_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33190_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33215_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33215_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33244_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33244_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33258_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33258_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33261_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33261_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33267_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33267_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33269_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33269_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33276_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33276_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33286_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33286_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33298_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33298_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33303_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33303_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33318_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33318_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33350_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33350_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33374_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33374_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33393_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33393_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:50:11.40 -13:49:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33400_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 33400_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01200_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214
The candidate 01200_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-02_22-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214 did not pass the final checks