fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits
fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 03.17075 | 2461347.67075 | 13.49 | 23:52:29.05 -10:04:59.5 | 5919 3244 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 03.17124 | 2461347.67124 | 13.46 | 23:52:29.05 -10:04:59.8 | 5926 3241 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.1710 2461347.6710 13.47 23:52:29.05 -10:04:59.6
80.94917 -68.00919 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
217 Eudora -0 -0 0 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:29.05 -10:04:59.6: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:29.05 -10:04:59.6: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 03.17075 | 2461347.67075 | 13.72 | 00:01:49.46 -08:36:25.4 | 4525 2354 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 03.17124 | 2461347.67124 | 13.78 | 00:01:49.45 -08:36:24.8 | 4533 2350 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.1710 2461347.6710 13.75 00:01:49.46 -08:36:25.1
88.26916 -68.07401 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
906 Repsolda -1 -0 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:01:49.46 -08:36:25.1: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:01:49.46 -08:36:25.1: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242 STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Cet-05-Q2b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Cet-05-Q2b1x1 ########### Processing Cet-05-Q2b1x1 WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 64108 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 64108 MB free at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits_preview.png'
Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits
renamed 'Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits_preview.png'
Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 765.4159 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 439.5498 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1295.7475 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 522.8016 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1294.1381 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 520.7048 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.69287 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.004 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 13.0 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 13.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-02T22:05:43.1505362' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-03T04:05:43.1505362' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61347.1706383103 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-03T04:05:53.0549094' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61347.1707529398 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.999696948146 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99969948008868 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 46.3755555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 182.348888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.38020682307017 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20709 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20709 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 13.0 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 13.0 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 6.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 63.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 897.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 13.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 156.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 22.00176 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 12.200976 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits :) Spent 0.984710 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 13.0600004196167 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 13.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-02T22:06:25.3017739' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-03T04:06:25.3017739' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61347.1711261692 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-03T04:06:35.2047518' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61347.171240787 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.999696965624 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99969946623878 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 46.3691666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 182.599166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.3803530285053 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20709 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20709 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 13.0600004196167 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 13.0600004196167 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 6.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 63.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 897.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 13.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 156.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 22.00176 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 12.200976 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits :) Spent 1.154497 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits
fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.67075405 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:04.554 -10:00:02.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:04.554 -10:00:02.60 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0169 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:07.673 -10:00:24.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:07.673 -10:00:24.18 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0301 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:00:04.554 -10:00:02.60 Second-epoch second image center 00:00:07.673 -10:00:24.18 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01413 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yIQBi2dw4p Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8nM6vHTwKj Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RCFV3sRXPQ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9dejTAZNSY Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.590100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.590100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=7.4) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3202 out of 3251 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3251 out of 4358 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=6.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.6 pix Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 2.3 pix Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 2.5 pix fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits 2.3 pix fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.9 mag. Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 15.0 mag. Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits 15.4 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.yIQBi2dw4p (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=897, passed=4374 Got 4374 stars (including 3271 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0780, gap 8.0780 to 351.9535 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3184 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3182 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0778, gap 8.0778 to 351.9539 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3184 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 3182 stars left (next iteration limit 3500) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=3182 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=1080 n_q2=583 n_q3=999 n_q4=520 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3182 N_valid=3182 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.031 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.319 p95_sep_arcsec=1.663 n_q1=1080 n_q2=583 n_q3=999 n_q4=520 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.8nM6vHTwKj (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, bad_region=887, passed=4358 Got 4358 stars (including 3264 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0779, gap 8.0779 to 351.9535 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3177 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0778, gap 8.0778 to 351.9539 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 3177 stars left (next iteration limit 3494) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=3177 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.249 n_q1=1022 n_q2=571 n_q3=1079 n_q4=505 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3177 N_valid=3177 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.010 median_sep_arcsec=0.258 p95_sep_arcsec=1.036 n_q1=1022 n_q2=571 n_q3=1079 n_q4=505 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.RCFV3sRXPQ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=334, bad_region=1332, passed=5508 Got 5508 stars (including 3903 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5508 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9740 through 0 to 8.0904, gap 8.0904 to 351.9740 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3800 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3796 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4441 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9743 through 0 to 8.0909, gap 8.0909 to 351.9743 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3800 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4441 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4441 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 3796 stars left (next iteration limit 4175) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3796 robust_rms=7.941 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.440 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.440 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3796 robust_rms=0.542 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.404 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.404 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3796 robust_rms=0.305 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.410 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.410 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3796 robust_rms_before=1.181 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.278 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.305 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.378 worst_region_rms_after=0.410 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.439 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.410 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.378 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.378 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.278 arcsec matched=3796 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits N_match=3796 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=1190 n_q2=749 n_q3=1173 n_q4=684 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.065 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3796 N_valid=3796 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.695 bias_dec_arcsec=0.598 median_sep_arcsec=1.087 p95_sep_arcsec=2.071 n_q1=1190 n_q2=749 n_q3=1173 n_q4=684 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.9dejTAZNSY (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=362, bad_region=1322, passed=5370 Got 5370 stars (including 3759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5370 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0100 through 0 to 8.0905, gap 8.0905 to 352.0100 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3653 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3649 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3649 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3649 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4305 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0102 through 0 to 8.0910, gap 8.0910 to 352.0102 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3653 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3649 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4305 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3649 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4305 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 3649 stars left (next iteration limit 4013) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3649 robust_rms=7.774 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.313 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.313 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3649 robust_rms=0.519 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.342 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.342 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3649 robust_rms=0.283 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.374 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.374 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3649 robust_rms_before=1.193 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.263 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.283 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.356 worst_region_rms_after=0.374 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.424 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.374 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.356 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.356 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.263 arcsec matched=3649 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits N_match=3649 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.249 n_q1=1141 n_q2=705 n_q3=1136 n_q4=667 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3649 N_valid=3649 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.754 bias_dec_arcsec=0.584 median_sep_arcsec=1.110 p95_sep_arcsec=2.075 n_q1=1141 n_q2=705 n_q3=1136 n_q4=667 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits sigma_overall=0.357 worst_q_ratio=1.090 ref2=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.120 new1=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits sigma_overall=0.285 worst_q_ratio=1.065 new2=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits sigma_overall=0.272 worst_q_ratio=1.079 reference average sigma_overall=0.3165 worst_q_ratio=1.105 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021_astrometric_residuals.png (3182 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490_astrometric_residuals.png (3177 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214_astrometric_residuals.png (3796 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215_astrometric_residuals.png (3649 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:04.554 -10:00:02.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:04.554 -10:00:02.60 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0169 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:07.673 -10:00:24.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:07.673 -10:00:24.18 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0301 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:00:04.554 -10:00:02.60 Second-epoch second image center 00:00:07.673 -10:00:24.18 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01413 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yOGqLDuggX Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Kq79t2BxV4 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RP6aPIclH6 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6fPc0YSenl Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.414650 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.414650 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.07 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.07
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=5.5) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 23415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4212 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3459 out of 3633 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 23415 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 18 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 2.2 pix Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 2.5 pix fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.1 mag. Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 15.2 mag. Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 15.4 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits 15.5 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.yOGqLDuggX (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=913, bad_region=4921, passed=22724 Got 22724 stars (including 17090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22724 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9459 through 0 to 8.0985, gap 8.0985 to 351.9459 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4836 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9463 through 0 to 8.0984, gap 8.0984 to 351.9463 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5319) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=4836 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=1598 n_q2=928 n_q3=1483 n_q4=827 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4836 N_valid=4836 bias_ra_arcsec=0.000 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.353 p95_sep_arcsec=1.499 n_q1=1598 n_q2=928 n_q3=1483 n_q4=827 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Kq79t2BxV4 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=831, bad_region=4531, passed=23408 Got 23408 stars (including 18214 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23408 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9462 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9462 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9465 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9465 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4838 stars left (next iteration limit 5321) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=4838 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=1569 n_q2=893 n_q3=1543 n_q4=833 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4838 N_valid=4838 bias_ra_arcsec=0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.018 median_sep_arcsec=0.279 p95_sep_arcsec=0.948 n_q1=1569 n_q2=893 n_q3=1543 n_q4=833 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.RP6aPIclH6 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1165, bad_region=5857, passed=27056 Got 27056 stars (including 20264 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27056 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9494 through 0 to 8.0970, gap 8.0970 to 351.9494 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22606 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9496 through 0 to 8.0977, gap 8.0977 to 351.9496 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22606 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22606 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5284) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4804 robust_rms=7.909 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.498 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.498 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4804 robust_rms=0.551 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.360 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.360 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4804 robust_rms=0.318 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.425 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.425 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4804 robust_rms_before=1.192 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.294 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.318 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.406 worst_region_rms_after=0.425 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.442 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.425 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.406 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.406 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.294 arcsec matched=4804 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=1496 n_q2=958 n_q3=1471 n_q4=879 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.062 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4804 N_valid=4804 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.711 bias_dec_arcsec=0.595 median_sep_arcsec=1.090 p95_sep_arcsec=2.065 n_q1=1496 n_q2=958 n_q3=1471 n_q4=879 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.6fPc0YSenl (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1109, bad_region=5994, passed=28001 Got 28001 stars (including 21103 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28001 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9753 through 0 to 8.1369, gap 8.1369 to 351.9753 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23435 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9755 through 0 to 8.1377, gap 8.1377 to 351.9755 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23435 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23435 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5283) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4803 robust_rms=7.687 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.551 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.551 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4803 robust_rms=0.536 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.222 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.222 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4803 robust_rms=0.298 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.401 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.401 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4803 robust_rms_before=1.204 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.280 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.298 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.368 worst_region_rms_after=0.401 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.428 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.401 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.368 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.368 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.280 arcsec matched=4803 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=1509 n_q2=959 n_q3=1456 n_q4=879 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.082 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4803 N_valid=4803 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.765 bias_dec_arcsec=0.587 median_sep_arcsec=1.112 p95_sep_arcsec=2.092 n_q1=1509 n_q2=959 n_q3=1456 n_q4=879 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:42:24.56 -06:00:20.4: 13.53 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:06:28.84 -13:25:13.0: 13.67 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:48.90 -06:31:08.3: 13.26 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:57:51.38 -07:49:34.3: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:09.57 -08:03:52.7: 13.79 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:54:35.18 -07:43:44.0: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:29.05 -10:04:59.6: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:36.29 -07:55:56.9: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:48:06.67 -07:36:48.0: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:13:02.70 -05:59:51.4: 13.79 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:54:35.18 -07:43:44.0: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:48:06.67 -07:36:48.0: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:48.90 -06:31:08.3: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:57:51.38 -07:49:34.3: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:36.29 -07:55:56.9: 12.06 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:09.57 -08:03:52.7: 13.82 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:06.67 -07:36:48.0: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2912 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:13:02.70 -05:59:51.4: 13.94 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:36.29 -07:55:56.9: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6698 delta=-0.84 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:09.57 -08:03:52.7: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3836 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:35.18 -07:43:44.0: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3694 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:48.90 -06:31:08.3: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4382 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:57:51.38 -07:49:34.3: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4065 delta=-0.88 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:02.70 -05:59:51.4: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2172 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:42:24.56 -06:00:20.4: 13.80 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:06:28.84 -13:25:13.0: 13.99 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:29.05 -10:04:59.6: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:42:24.56 -06:00:20.4: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2519 delta=-0.61 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:28.84 -13:25:13.0: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0257 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:03:22.13 -10:46:13.3: 13.83 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:54:09.75 -09:18:47.6: 14.37 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:44:44.90 -06:55:20.7: 13.47 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:00:47.29 -09:01:10.9: 13.65 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:43.31 -06:40:27.7: 14.36 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:42:10.68 -13:10:15.7: 14.47 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:44:44.45 -06:55:37.7: 13.61 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:01:49.46 -08:36:25.1: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:03:22.13 -10:46:13.3: 13.92 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:54:09.75 -09:18:47.6: 14.32 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:03:22.13 -10:46:13.3: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0388 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:44:44.90 -06:55:20.7: 13.63 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:01:49.46 -08:36:25.1: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:43.31 -06:40:27.7: 14.23 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:44:44.45 -06:55:37.7: 13.72 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:09.75 -09:18:47.6: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4337 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:44:44.90 -06:55:20.7: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7478 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:42:10.68 -13:10:15.7: 14.42 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:43.31 -06:40:27.7: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3272 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:44:44.45 -06:55:37.7: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3653 delta=-0.70 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:42:10.68 -13:10:15.7: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4073 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:00:47.29 -09:01:10.9: 13.83 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:47.29 -09:01:10.9: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0829 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34324.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34684.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 59s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32133_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 32133_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 11 03.17075 2461347.67075 14.30 23:56:09.54 -08:03:53.5 5372 2024 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32134_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 32134_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 11 03.17124 2461347.67124 14.49 23:56:09.61 -08:03:51.8 5379 2020 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Discovery image 1 2026 11 03.17075 2461347.67075 14.03 00:06:28.80 -13:25:13.8 3853 5270 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32137_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 32137_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 11 03.17124 2461347.67124 14.03 00:06:28.89 -13:25:12.2 3860 5266 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Discovery image 1 2026 11 03.17075 2461347.67075 14.14 00:13:02.71 -05:59:51.4 2824 0782 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32138_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 32138_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 11 03.17124 2461347.67124 14.34 00:13:02.69 -05:59:51.3 2832 0778 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Discovery image 1 2026 11 03.17075 2461347.67075 14.26 23:42:24.60 -06:00:20.9 7451 0776 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32141_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 32141_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 11 03.17124 2461347.67124 14.25 23:42:24.52 -06:00:20.0 7459 0773 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Discovery image 1 2026 11 03.17075 2461347.67075 13.51 23:54:35.18 -07:43:43.1 5607 1820 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32142_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 32142_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 11 03.17124 2461347.67124 13.29 23:54:35.18 -07:43:44.9 5615 1817 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Discovery image 1 2026 11 03.17075 2461347.67075 13.40 23:57:51.35 -07:49:34.6 5117 1880 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32144_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 32144_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 11 03.17124 2461347.67124 13.41 23:57:51.41 -07:49:34.1 5125 1876 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Discovery image 1 2026 11 03.17075 2461347.67075 12.69 23:43:36.28 -07:55:57.3 7257 1948 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33988_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 33988_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 11 03.17124 2461347.67124 12.66 23:43:36.30 -07:55:56.5 7265 1945 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Discovery image 1 2026 11 03.17075 2461347.67075 13.35 23:48:06.67 -07:36:48.0 6580 1752 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34065_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 34065_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 11 03.17124 2461347.67124 13.25 23:48:06.67 -07:36:48.1 6588 1748 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Discovery image 1 2026 11 03.17075 2461347.67075 13.41 23:52:48.90 -06:31:08.3 5875 1086 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34324_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 Preparing report for the candidate 34324_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34579_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 34579_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 11 03.17124 2461347.67124 13.47 23:52:48.90 -06:31:08.2 5883 1083 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Discovery image 1 2026 11 03.17075 2461347.67075 13.80 23:44:44.92 -06:55:20.4 7090 1334 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34684_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 Preparing report for the candidate 34684_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35399_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 35399_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 11 03.17124 2461347.67124 13.71 23:44:44.88 -06:55:20.9 7098 1330 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Discovery image 1 2026 11 03.17075 2461347.67075 14.11 00:00:47.29 -09:01:11.0 4681 2603 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35459_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 35459_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 11 03.17124 2461347.67124 14.06 00:00:47.29 -09:01:10.9 4689 2599 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Discovery image 1 2026 11 03.17075 2461347.67075 14.32 23:44:44.51 -06:55:37.6 7091 1337 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35460_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 35460_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 11 03.17124 2461347.67124 14.43 23:44:44.39 -06:55:37.8 7099 1333 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Discovery image 1 2026 11 03.17075 2461347.67075 14.04 00:03:22.15 -10:46:13.5 4302 3662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35554_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 35554_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 11 03.17124 2461347.67124 14.04 00:03:22.11 -10:46:13.1 4310 3658 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Discovery image 1 2026 11 03.17075 2461347.67075 14.31 23:52:43.29 -06:40:27.9 5889 1181 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35816_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 35816_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 11 03.17124 2461347.67124 14.34 23:52:43.33 -06:40:27.6 5897 1177 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Discovery image 1 2026 11 03.17075 2461347.67075 14.33 23:54:09.73 -09:18:47.9 5669 2779 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35861_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 The candidate 35861_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 11 03.17124 2461347.67124 14.58 23:54:09.78 -09:18:47.3 5677 2775 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits Discovery image 1 2026 11 03.17075 2461347.67075 14.31 23:42:10.58 -13:10:16.0 7440 5129 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-05-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0214.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 62s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 23:52:29.05 -10:04:59.6 00:01:49.46 -08:36:25.1 ########### Completed Cet-05-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 23:52:29.05 -10:04:59.6 00:01:49.46 -08:36:25.1 ################################################################################### 23:52:29.05 -10:04:59.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 00:01:49.46 -08:36:25.1 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461347.67075405 -observatory V36 14:43:44.98 -16:45:39.3 Mercury (5.2mag) 13:25:36.27 -13:39:33.6 Venus (-4.3mag) 09:29:08.90 +16:35:04.2 Mars (0.8mag) 09:46:59.83 +14:06:34.3 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:36:27.97 +01:00:52.4 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:09:03.85 +20:50:12.8 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:08:20.95 -00:38:11.2 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:27.94 -23:41:34.8 Pluto (14.5mag) 09:59:01.63 +11:45:18.9 Moon (-9.9mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Nov 2 22:42 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461347.67075405: 09:46:57.52 +14:06:48.5 Io (6.0mag) 09:46:54.97 +14:07:04.5 Europa (6.1mag) 09:47:14.95 +14:05:07.6 Ganymede (5.5mag) 09:47:28.51 +14:03:50.9 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:48:25.98 +14:16:12.8 Himalia (15.5mag) 09:46:59.11 +14:06:38.2 Thebe (16.3mag) 09:46:45.10 +14:31:34.4 Elara (17.4mag) 09:47:46.43 +13:34:09.7 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 09:44:02.26 +14:38:27.0 Carme (18.7mag) 00:36:36.07 +01:00:23.2 Titan (8.3mag) 00:36:30.11 +01:00:50.7 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:36:57.94 +01:01:28.6 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:36:16.02 +01:00:34.3 Hyperion (14.2mag) 00:34:41.23 +00:48:42.4 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Nov 2 22:42 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461347.67075405: 04:35:36.97 +17:22:55.5 JWST 12:35:14.02 +52:28:56.4 Chandra 06:07:26.11 +25:25:43.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Nov 2 22:42 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461347.67075405 -observatory V36 03:33:50.06 +19:57:09.9 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:46:33.63 +38:22:01.5 17.9mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill) 07:46:38.99 +38:21:48.5 17.9mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 07:45:57.59 +38:22:08.1 17.9mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill) 05:01:58.56 +39:09:04.9 17.8mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski) 18:47:48.41 -32:53:05.8 15.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:45:17.29 -73:53:26.7 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:11:32.80 +35:18:07.3 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 07:35:41.56 +25:20:21.6 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:08:33.18 +38:29:46.2 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:36:50.95 +40:52:27.5 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:43:08.47 -13:33:35.4 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 14:15:00.53 -04:34:08.3 16.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 20:13:51.58 +53:14:40.7 15.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 13:07:21.77 +16:57:08.5 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:01:09.98 -65:16:25.0 14.5mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 19:33:49.87 -05:21:57.5 17.1mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS) 23:29:28.29 +14:07:19.5 16.8mag 2P/Encke 23:25:45.52 -25:50:43.5 15.4mag 10P/Tempel 02:39:41.50 +30:41:56.9 16.3mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:26:00.60 -10:00:59.8 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:10:46.04 -09:01:37.5 15.8mag 65P/Gunn 08:00:01.21 +13:36:37.6 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 08:59:00.55 +45:53:49.2 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:50:41.48 +05:41:13.0 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 12:26:25.20 +08:05:59.0 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 19:49:30.21 +14:20:59.0 10.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 11:11:40.01 -03:03:52.1 16.2mag 169P/NEAT 09:41:28.56 +23:30:30.9 18.0mag 186P/Garradd 03:10:56.27 +02:12:20.1 15.3mag 220P/McNaught 06:22:38.32 +49:43:36.8 15.6mag 260P/McNaught 07:56:14.29 +25:04:47.3 17.6mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.6K Nov 2 22:42 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92 10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27 21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82 01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9 01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88 00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77 22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42 01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3 18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.89 -10:37:05.90 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.05 15.79 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Nov 2 22:42 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag 05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag 05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Nov 2 22:42 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 17:53:52.220 +41:47:24.16 AT 2026afqm 2026-10-16.83 19.331 06:23:17.419 +70:33:15.10 SN 2026afql 2026-10-17.15 18.737 02:38:36.934 +41:55:58.84 AT 2026afqk 2026-10-17.04 19.369 05:26:14.588 -27:06:01.24 AT 2026afqj 2026-10-17.29 19.31 02:01:09.758 -36:18:14.69 AT 2026afqi 2026-10-12.26 19.361 09:44:49.328 +38:11:23.47 SN 2026afqh 2026-10-17.22 18.467 17:38:02.102 +55:52:14.30 AT 2026afqg 2026-10-16.84 19.253 02:35:38.526 -36:21:14.39 AT 2026afqf 2026-10-17.25 19.522 00:43:30.828 +41:26:55.48 AT 2026afqe 2026-10-17.57 18.61 00:25:27.859 +20:14:37.33 SN 2026afqd 2026-10-17.09 19.18 08:07:08.624 +06:16:20.09 SN 2026afqc 2026-10-11.25 19.94 04:47:31.739 +04:21:53.97 SN 2026afqb 2026-10-05.43 20.6842 03:07:45.440 -28:00:44.28 AT 2026afqa 2026-09-13.29 19.318 05:09:31.456 +75:44:45.10 AT 2026afpz 2026-10-11.55 19.477 07:54:22.348 +45:24:44.35 AT 2026afpy 2026-10-14.57 19.243 09:05:20.790 -70:27:10.93 AT 2026afpx 2026-10-15.10 18.44 19:07:21.022 +39:54:50.78 AT 2026afpw 2026-10-14.27 19.073 18:53:58.015 +34:24:21.77 AT 2026afpv 2026-10-13.86 18.776 18:40:01.554 -27:06:46.60 AT 2026afpu 2026-10-05.24 18.99 20:21:05.817 +62:24:12.13 AT 2026afpt 2026-10-16.29 19.142 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Nov 2 22:42 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 2 2026 11 03.17124 2461347.67124 14.55 23:42:10.78 -13:10:15.4 7447 5125 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_221700_TTUQ2b1x1_3434211_ScZayUEc/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_22-06-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0215.fits
