NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-05-Q2b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=esa_tap (lib/gaia_dr2_cone_search.sh -> ESA Gaia Archive TAP service)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 119313 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 119313 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits_preview.png'
UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits

renamed 'UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits_preview.png'
UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 440.9575 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 445.9569 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1538.1029 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 498.9924 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1538.6136 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 497.3049 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.4881 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 15.2600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-02T19:55:15.4622066' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-03T01:55:15.4622066' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61347.0800400693 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-03T01:55:25.3647150' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61347.080154676 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 205.713420916675 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 61.9997041603935 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.9183333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 335.820833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.60180600010073 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 42 51' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20686 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20686 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 15.2600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 15.2600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 4.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 46.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 895.7 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 115.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 25.602048 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 20.50164 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/d_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits :) Spent 0.799106 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/d_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 15.2700004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-02T19:56:12.3683986' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-03T01:56:12.3683986' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61347.0806987039 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-03T01:56:22.2724087' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61347.0808133334 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 205.713420870017 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 61.9997042326829 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.8358333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 335.903333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.61959450331855 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 42 51' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20686 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20686 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 15.2700004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 15.2700004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 4.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 46.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 895.7 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 115.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 25.602048 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 20.50164 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/d_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits :) Spent 0.792332 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/d_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits


fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.58015581 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits Image size: 938.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:54.578 +62:00:12.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61 Second-epoch image center 13:42:54.578 +62:00:12.89 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0136 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits Image size: 938.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:54.611 +61:59:36.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61 Second-epoch image center 13:42:54.611 +61:59:36.49 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0194 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 13:42:54.578 +62:00:12.89 Second-epoch second image center 13:42:54.611 +61:59:36.49 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01011 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y7DX1Od5Ii Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ixcFTJAZ9f Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3s6ViP6IXZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kji4VElNRA Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2617 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2617 deg Loaded 6074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3959 out of 4068 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4068 out of 6503 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.653700 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.653700 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2617 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2617 deg Loaded 6074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3959 out of 4068 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4068 out of 6503 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (aperture=6.5) Read 6522 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6066 to 224.9768 deg, Dec +55.8887 to +67.2580 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6066 to 224.9768 deg, Dec 55.8887 to 67.2580 deg Loaded 6076 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3951 out of 4074 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4074 out of 6522 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (aperture=6.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 2.4 pix UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits 2.5 pix fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 15.4 mag. UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 14.8 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits 14.8 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.y7DX1Od5Ii (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=380, bad_region=1498, passed=6503 Got 6503 stars (including 4695 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4581 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4578 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4578 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4578 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5278 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4581 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4578 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5278 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4578 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5278 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4578 stars left (next iteration limit 5035) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits N_match=4578 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=1515 n_q2=886 n_q3=1433 n_q4=744 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4578 N_valid=4578 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.010 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.298 p95_sep_arcsec=0.941 n_q1=1515 n_q2=886 n_q3=1433 n_q4=744 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.ixcFTJAZ9f (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=400, bad_region=1501, passed=6522 Got 6522 stars (including 4694 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6522 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4581 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4577 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4577 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4577 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5290 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4581 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4577 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5290 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4577 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5290 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4577 stars left (next iteration limit 5034) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits N_match=4577 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=1530 n_q2=880 n_q3=1434 n_q4=733 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.191 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4577 N_valid=4577 bias_ra_arcsec=0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.299 p95_sep_arcsec=0.955 n_q1=1530 n_q2=880 n_q3=1434 n_q4=733 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.3s6ViP6IXZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=238, bad_region=669, passed=4157 Got 4157 stars (including 3284 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4157 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3201 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3198 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3198 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3198 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3634 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3201 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3198 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3634 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3198 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3634 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 3198 stars left (next iteration limit 3517) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3198 robust_rms=6.934 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.286 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.286 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3198 robust_rms=0.659 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.782 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.672 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3198 robust_rms=0.601 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.757 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.471 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=3198 robust_rms_before=1.298 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.399 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.659 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.469 worst_region_rms_after=0.782 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.279 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.672 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.469 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.469 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.399 arcsec matched=3198 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits N_match=3198 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.493 n_q1=1139 n_q2=560 n_q3=1026 n_q4=473 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.220 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3198 N_valid=3198 bias_ra_arcsec=0.604 bias_dec_arcsec=0.018 median_sep_arcsec=1.039 p95_sep_arcsec=2.934 n_q1=1139 n_q2=560 n_q3=1026 n_q4=473 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.kji4VElNRA (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=224, bad_region=659, passed=4147 Got 4147 stars (including 3291 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4147 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3200 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3198 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3198 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3198 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3632 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3200 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3198 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3632 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3198 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3632 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 3198 stars left (next iteration limit 3517) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3198 robust_rms=6.915 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.154 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.154 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3198 robust_rms=0.621 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.777 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.571 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3198 robust_rms=0.584 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.685 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.460 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3198 robust_rms_before=1.206 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.394 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.584 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.484 worst_region_rms_after=0.685 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.238 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.460 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.484 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.484 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.394 arcsec matched=3198 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits N_match=3198 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.467 n_q1=1155 n_q2=557 n_q3=1019 n_q4=467 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.211 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3198 N_valid=3198 bias_ra_arcsec=0.496 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.080 median_sep_arcsec=0.898 p95_sep_arcsec=2.951 n_q1=1155 n_q2=557 n_q3=1019 n_q4=467 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits sigma_overall=0.356 worst_q_ratio=1.185 ref2=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.191 new1=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.220 new2=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.211 reference average sigma_overall=0.361 worst_q_ratio=1.188 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179_astrometric_residuals.png (4578 matched stars from wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180_astrometric_residuals.png (4577 matched stars from wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086_astrometric_residuals.png (3198 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087_astrometric_residuals.png (3198 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits Image size: 938.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:54.578 +62:00:12.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61 Second-epoch image center 13:42:54.578 +62:00:12.89 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0136 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits Image size: 938.3'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:42:54.611 +61:59:36.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61 Second-epoch image center 13:42:54.611 +61:59:36.49 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0194 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 13:42:54.578 +62:00:12.89 Second-epoch second image center 13:42:54.611 +61:59:36.49 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01011 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SGVWMK4vPw Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F6mQTwd3EH Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JhtMTVrEf4 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bZfSGPzZ6m Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 33815 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2697 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2697 deg Loaded 6170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3809 out of 4122 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4122 out of 33815 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.529000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.529000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.91 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 33815 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2697 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2697 deg Loaded 6170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3809 out of 4122 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4122 out of 33815 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (aperture=5.0) Read 33636 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3037 to 225.2618 deg, Dec +55.8888 to +67.2587 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3037 to 225.2618 deg, Dec 55.8888 to 67.2587 deg Loaded 6169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3802 out of 4121 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4121 out of 33636 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (aperture=5.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 2.2 pix UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits 2.5 pix fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 15.6 mag. UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 14.9 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits 14.9 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.SGVWMK4vPw (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1409, bad_region=6082, passed=33797 Got 33797 stars (including 26535 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33797 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29241 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29241 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29241 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=1628 n_q2=986 n_q3=1423 n_q4=845 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4882 N_valid=4882 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.028 bias_dec_arcsec=0.009 median_sep_arcsec=0.298 p95_sep_arcsec=0.906 n_q1=1628 n_q2=986 n_q3=1423 n_q4=845 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.F6mQTwd3EH (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=1410, bad_region=6001, passed=33607 Got 33607 stars (including 26445 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33607 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29097 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29097 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29097 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=1633 n_q2=987 n_q3=1424 n_q4=837 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.180 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4881 N_valid=4881 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.017 bias_dec_arcsec=0.012 median_sep_arcsec=0.301 p95_sep_arcsec=0.932 n_q1=1633 n_q2=987 n_q3=1424 n_q4=837 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.JhtMTVrEf4 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=773, bad_region=2564, passed=21033 Got 21033 stars (including 17864 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21033 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4839 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4833 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19130 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4839 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19130 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19130 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 4833 stars left (next iteration limit 5316) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=6.737 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.109 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.109 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=0.675 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.800 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.692 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=0.616 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.798 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.506 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4833 robust_rms_before=1.288 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.406 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.675 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.494 worst_region_rms_after=0.800 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.331 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.692 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.494 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.494 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.406 arcsec matched=4833 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits N_match=4833 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.475 n_q1=1757 n_q2=835 n_q3=1575 n_q4=666 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.161 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4833 N_valid=4833 bias_ra_arcsec=0.618 bias_dec_arcsec=0.032 median_sep_arcsec=1.030 p95_sep_arcsec=2.892 n_q1=1757 n_q2=835 n_q3=1575 n_q4=666 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.bZfSGPzZ6m (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=769, bad_region=2543, passed=20865 Got 20865 stars (including 17706 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20865 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4835 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18980 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18980 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18980 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 4835 stars left (next iteration limit 5318) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4835 robust_rms=6.823 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.469 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.469 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4835 robust_rms=0.637 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.760 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.596 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4835 robust_rms=0.593 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.693 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.483 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4835 robust_rms_before=1.218 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.408 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.593 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.504 worst_region_rms_after=0.693 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.376 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.483 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.504 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.504 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.408 arcsec matched=4835 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits N_match=4835 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.497 n_q1=1757 n_q2=849 n_q3=1565 n_q4=664 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4835 N_valid=4835 bias_ra_arcsec=0.505 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.071 median_sep_arcsec=0.904 p95_sep_arcsec=2.955 n_q1=1757 n_q2=849 n_q3=1565 n_q4=664 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:34:27.22 +58:57:23.6: 14.27 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:23:08.45 +59:17:29.0: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:37:41.07 +60:46:05.0: 14.50 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:27:41.18 +59:05:19.8: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:27:41.18 +59:05:19.8: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:37:41.07 +60:46:05.0: 14.69 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:23:08.45 +59:17:29.0: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:41.07 +60:46:05.0: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5505 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:27:41.18 +59:05:19.8: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3935 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:23:08.45 +59:17:29.0: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8798 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:34:27.22 +58:57:23.6: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:27.22 +58:57:23.6: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3582 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51849_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087 The candidate 51849_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08016    2461347.58016    14.35    14:34:27.33 +58:57:24.0   0814 4767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08081    2461347.58081    14.36    14:34:27.12 +58:57:23.1   0814 4762   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51851_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087 The candidate 51851_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08081    2461347.58081    13.18    13:41:55.19 +62:31:54.9   4849 2868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51997_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087 The candidate 51997_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08081    2461347.58081    12.70    14:17:02.62 +59:37:50.4   2219 4531   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits **** FOUND 14:17:02.62 +59:37:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52154_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087 The candidate 52154_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08016    2461347.58016    13.54    14:27:41.16 +59:05:20.6   1355 4767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08081    2461347.58081    13.31    14:27:41.20 +59:05:18.9   1355 4762   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52234_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087 The candidate 52234_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08081    2461347.58081    13.82    14:24:29.35 +60:16:22.4   1701 4080   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits **** FOUND 14:24:29.44 +60:16:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52289_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087 The candidate 52289_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08016    2461347.58016    13.95    14:23:08.44 +59:17:29.1   1725 4691   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08081    2461347.58081    13.83    14:23:08.45 +59:17:29.0   1725 4685   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52367_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087 The candidate 52367_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08081    2461347.58081    14.26    13:57:23.80 +59:58:04.7   3727 4420   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits **** FOUND 13:57:23.82 +59:58:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52463_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087 The candidate 52463_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08016    2461347.58016    14.55    14:37:40.82 +60:46:05.9   0767 3637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-55-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08081    2461347.58081    14.55    14:37:41.32 +60:46:04.1   0766 3631   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32649_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087 The candidate 32649_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 11 03.08081    2461347.58081    13.03    13:25:30.76 +60:10:43.2   6121 4208   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_200909_TTUQ2b1x1_2300273_garI9Nsh/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0087.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.1") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-05-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461347.58015581 -observatory V36 14:44:10.22 -16:49:30.2 Mercury (5.1mag) 13:25:42.32 -13:41:42.9 Venus (-4.3mag) 09:28:57.86 +16:35:48.3 Mars (0.8mag) 09:46:57.29 +14:06:45.9 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:36:29.22 +01:00:59.5 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:09:04.69 +20:50:15.0 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:08:21.36 -00:38:08.7 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:27.76 -23:41:35.6 Pluto (14.5mag) 09:52:41.39 +12:14:51.7 Moon (-10.0mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Nov 2 20:28 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461347.58015581: 09:46:57.11 +14:06:47.8 Io (6.0mag) 09:46:54.01 +14:07:07.1 Europa (6.1mag) 09:47:13.07 +14:05:15.3 Ganymede (5.5mag) 09:47:25.56 +14:04:04.7 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:48:23.06 +14:16:27.9 Himalia (15.5mag) 09:46:59.52 +14:06:33.6 Thebe (16.3mag) 09:46:42.25 +14:31:45.6 Elara (17.4mag) 09:47:44.34 +13:34:19.2 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 09:44:00.08 +14:38:37.6 Carme (18.7mag) 00:36:36.98 +01:00:30.0 Titan (8.3mag) 00:36:31.93 +01:00:56.5 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:36:59.05 +01:01:34.5 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:36:17.00 +01:00:42.0 Hyperion (14.2mag) 00:34:42.49 +00:48:49.2 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Nov 2 20:28 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461347.58015581: 04:35:22.59 +17:22:23.0 JWST 11:03:38.82 +47:02:06.1 Chandra 04:41:55.29 +49:54:49.6 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Nov 2 20:28 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461347.58015581 -observatory V36 03:33:54.15 +19:57:16.8 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:46:31.85 +38:21:37.6 17.9mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill) 07:46:37.21 +38:21:24.6 17.9mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 07:45:55.82 +38:21:44.2 17.9mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill) 05:01:59.87 +39:09:59.0 17.8mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski) 18:47:42.36 -32:53:16.2 15.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:45:16.89 -73:53:05.8 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:11:34.23 +35:17:58.1 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 07:35:41.04 +25:20:21.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:08:32.62 +38:28:59.4 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:36:47.42 +40:52:31.3 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:43:10.23 -13:33:41.6 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 14:14:54.54 -04:33:43.0 16.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 20:13:31.34 +53:18:14.1 15.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 13:07:16.62 +16:56:23.2 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:01:22.84 -65:13:01.3 14.5mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 19:33:44.61 -05:21:52.9 17.1mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS) 23:29:41.30 +14:08:44.2 16.8mag 2P/Encke 23:25:38.80 -25:52:15.2 15.4mag 10P/Tempel 02:39:35.65 +30:44:44.4 16.3mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:25:57.19 -10:00:33.6 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:10:48.06 -09:01:42.9 15.8mag 65P/Gunn 07:59:56.88 +13:37:09.8 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 08:58:42.40 +45:52:37.3 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:50:31.12 +05:43:16.9 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 12:26:14.62 +08:07:11.5 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 19:49:43.16 +14:19:33.2 10.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 11:11:28.46 -03:02:54.2 16.2mag 169P/NEAT 09:41:26.23 +23:30:45.7 18.0mag 186P/Garradd 03:11:01.58 +02:12:43.6 15.3mag 220P/McNaught 06:22:37.67 +49:42:37.6 15.6mag 260P/McNaught 07:56:08.59 +25:04:52.6 17.6mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.6K Nov 2 20:28 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92 10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27 21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82 01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9 01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88 00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77 22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42 01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3 18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.89 -10:37:05.90 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.05 15.79 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Nov 2 20:28 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag 05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag 05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Nov 2 20:28 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 02:38:36.934 +41:55:58.84 AT 2026afqk 2026-10-17.04 19.369 05:26:14.588 -27:06:01.24 AT 2026afqj 2026-10-17.29 19.31 02:01:09.758 -36:18:14.69 AT 2026afqi 2026-10-12.26 19.361 09:44:49.328 +38:11:23.47 SN 2026afqh 2026-10-17.22 18.467 17:38:02.102 +55:52:14.30 AT 2026afqg 2026-10-16.84 19.253 02:35:38.526 -36:21:14.39 AT 2026afqf 2026-10-17.25 19.522 00:43:30.828 +41:26:55.48 AT 2026afqe 2026-10-17.57 18.61 00:25:27.859 +20:14:37.33 SN 2026afqd 2026-10-17.09 19.18 08:07:08.624 +06:16:20.09 SN 2026afqc 2026-10-11.25 19.94 04:47:31.739 +04:21:53.97 SN 2026afqb 2026-10-05.43 20.6842 03:07:45.440 -28:00:44.28 AT 2026afqa 2026-09-13.29 19.318 05:09:31.456 +75:44:45.10 AT 2026afpz 2026-10-11.55 19.477 07:54:22.348 +45:24:44.35 AT 2026afpy 2026-10-14.57 19.243 09:05:20.790 -70:27:10.93 AT 2026afpx 2026-10-15.10 18.44 19:07:21.022 +39:54:50.78 AT 2026afpw 2026-10-14.27 19.073 18:53:58.015 +34:24:21.77 AT 2026afpv 2026-10-13.86 18.776 18:40:01.554 -27:06:46.60 AT 2026afpu 2026-10-05.24 18.99 20:21:05.817 +62:24:12.13 AT 2026afpt 2026-10-16.29 19.142 22:24:49.282 -52:50:33.43 AT 2026afps 2026-10-16.02 17.787 01:33:01.239 -52:47:38.61 SN 2026afpr 2026-10-14.95 17.735 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Nov 2 20:28 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 88 C