NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cap-05-Q2b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits
Field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=esa_tap (lib/gaia_dr2_cone_search.sh -> ESA Gaia Archive TAP service)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cap-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cap-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cap-05-Q2b1x1
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 91240 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 91240 MB free at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.png' -> 'transient_report/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits_preview.png'
Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits

renamed 'Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.png' -> 'transient_report/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits_preview.png'
Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2200.0553 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 534.8469 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1942.9777 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 630.5739 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1938.9587 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 629.8321 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 0.883149 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 15.3599996566772 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-02T19:57:21.7138154' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-03T01:57:21.7138154' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61347.0815013079 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-03T01:57:31.6140135' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61347.0816159029 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 316.798853040157 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -26.000122870489 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 29.1669444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 193.006388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.04557962280433 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cap-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '21 07 12' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-26 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20686 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20686 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 15.3599996566772 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 15.3599996566772 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 4.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 47.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 895.9 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 117.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 31.302504 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 24.101928 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/d_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits :) Spent 0.636385 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/d_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 15.1899995803833 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-02T19:58:23.2035044' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-03T01:58:23.2035044' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61347.0822129976 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-03T01:58:33.1040632' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61347.0823275927 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 316.79885309463 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -26.0001228511638 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 29.1180555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 193.2675 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.048686561785 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cap-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '21 07 12' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-26 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20686 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20686 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 15.1899995803833 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 15.1899995803833 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 4.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 47.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 895.9 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 117.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 31.302504 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 24.101928 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/d_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits :) Spent 0.642321 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/d_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits


fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.58161705 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Image size: 937.0'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 21:07:12.971 -26:00:12.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08 Second-epoch image center 21:07:12.971 -26:00:12.90 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0061 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits Image size: 937.0'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 21:07:10.658 -25:59:22.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08 Second-epoch image center 21:07:10.658 -25:59:22.73 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0103 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 21:07:12.971 -26:00:12.90 Second-epoch second image center 21:07:10.658 -25:59:22.73 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01641 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PRImdoDTxl Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FiOOCJ3bZ8 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8zffyN5NYB Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rDylbyNNe9 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 4103 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7791 to 325.8207 deg, Dec -31.2640 to -20.5569 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7791 to 325.8207 deg, Dec -31.2640 to -20.5569 deg Loaded 7074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2509 out of 2559 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2559 out of 4103 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.363500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.363500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.24 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 4103 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7791 to 325.8207 deg, Dec -31.2640 to -20.5569 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7791 to 325.8207 deg, Dec -31.2640 to -20.5569 deg Loaded 7074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2509 out of 2559 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2559 out of 4103 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (aperture=6.6) Read 4114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7791 to 325.8210 deg, Dec -31.2636 to -20.5567 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7791 to 325.8210 deg, Dec -31.2636 to -20.5567 deg Loaded 7074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2500 out of 2554 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2554 out of 4114 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (aperture=6.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits 2.4 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 2.6 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits 2.6 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.2 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits 14.3 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.PRImdoDTxl (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=324, bad_region=772, passed=4103 Got 4103 stars (including 3074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4103 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3015 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3010 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3010 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3010 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3492 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3017 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3009 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3492 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3009 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3492 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Excluding outliers - 3009 stars left (next iteration limit 3311) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits N_match=3009 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.437 n_q1=1018 n_q2=468 n_q3=1055 n_q4=468 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3009 N_valid=3009 bias_ra_arcsec=-1.805 bias_dec_arcsec=1.468 median_sep_arcsec=3.892 p95_sep_arcsec=7.197 n_q1=1018 n_q2=468 n_q3=1055 n_q4=468 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.FiOOCJ3bZ8 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=328, bad_region=762, passed=4114 Got 4114 stars (including 3090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4114 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3026 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3019 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3019 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3019 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3507 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3027 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3019 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3507 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3019 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3507 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Excluding outliers - 3019 stars left (next iteration limit 3320) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits N_match=3019 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.471 n_q1=1044 n_q2=459 n_q3=1056 n_q4=460 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3019 N_valid=3019 bias_ra_arcsec=-1.935 bias_dec_arcsec=1.463 median_sep_arcsec=4.064 p95_sep_arcsec=6.971 n_q1=1044 n_q2=459 n_q3=1056 n_q4=460 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.8zffyN5NYB (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, bad_region=1842, passed=7312 Got 7312 stars (including 5165 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7312 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5871 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5871 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5871 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5352) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=7.307 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.949 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.949 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.405 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.858 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.858 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.369 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.537 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.537 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4866 robust_rms_before=0.879 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.354 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.369 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.585 worst_region_rms_after=0.537 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.037 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.537 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.585 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.585 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.354 arcsec matched=4866 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=1567 n_q2=941 n_q3=1456 n_q4=902 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4866 N_valid=4866 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.355 bias_dec_arcsec=0.586 median_sep_arcsec=0.819 p95_sep_arcsec=1.642 n_q1=1567 n_q2=941 n_q3=1456 n_q4=902 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.rDylbyNNe9 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=415, bad_region=1890, passed=7394 Got 7394 stars (including 5197 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7394 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5905 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5905 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5905 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5350) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=7.314 arcsec worst_region_rms=17.259 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=17.259 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=0.440 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.945 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.945 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=0.393 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.558 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.558 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4864 robust_rms_before=0.902 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.354 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.393 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.575 worst_region_rms_after=0.558 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.068 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.558 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.575 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.575 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.354 arcsec matched=4864 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=1554 n_q2=936 n_q3=1462 n_q4=912 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4864 N_valid=4864 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.345 bias_dec_arcsec=0.607 median_sep_arcsec=0.826 p95_sep_arcsec=1.695 n_q1=1554 n_q2=936 n_q3=1462 n_q4=912 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits sigma_overall=0.463 worst_q_ratio=1.131 ref2=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits sigma_overall=0.502 worst_q_ratio=1.159 new1=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.151 new2=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits sigma_overall=0.341 worst_q_ratio=1.134 reference average sigma_overall=0.4825 worst_q_ratio=1.145 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224_astrometric_residuals.png (3009 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225_astrometric_residuals.png (3019 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088_astrometric_residuals.png (4866 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089_astrometric_residuals.png (4864 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:13:57.64 -26:28:43.0: 11.36 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:11:04.95 -26:26:33.6: 11.19 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:05:27.37 -24:06:38.1: 11.64 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:05:27.37 -24:06:38.1: 11.67 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:11:04.95 -26:26:33.6: 11.18 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:13:57.64 -26:28:43.0: 11.38 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.65 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:27.37 -24:06:38.1: ref_mag=11.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2082 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.19 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.37 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:11:04.95 -26:26:33.6: ref_mag=11.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1624 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:13:57.64 -26:28:43.0: ref_mag=11.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0614 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20438_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 20438_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    10.07    21:07:36.66 -23:55:15.1   4729 1945   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits **** FOUND 21:07:36.66 -23:55:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20764_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 20764_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    11.06    21:13:57.63 -26:28:43.3   3877 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    11.07    21:13:57.64 -26:28:42.7   3872 3497   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20802_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 20802_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    11.14    21:11:04.96 -26:26:33.6   4266 3462   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    11.18    21:11:04.95 -26:26:33.6   4261 3471   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20823_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 20823_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    11.18    21:02:20.92 -27:05:13.4   5439 3860   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits **** FOUND 21:02:20.91 -27:05:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20833_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 20833_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    11.20    21:05:27.37 -24:06:38.2   5031 2051   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    11.21    21:05:27.37 -24:06:38.0   5026 2060   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 00533_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 00533_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    9.39    21:26:44.00 -29:51:04.3   2215 5591   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits **** FOUND 21:26:43.99 -29:51:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Image size: 937.0'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 21:07:12.971 -26:00:12.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08 Second-epoch image center 21:07:12.971 -26:00:12.90 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0061 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits Image size: 937.0'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 21:07:10.658 -25:59:22.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08 Second-epoch image center 21:07:10.658 -25:59:22.73 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0103 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 21:07:12.971 -26:00:12.90 Second-epoch second image center 21:07:10.658 -25:59:22.73 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01641 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JWl0fORNP8 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0t63Sjgimc Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cNfkUDX44Y Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JvU9cru1Ih Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 30382 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7565 to 325.8970 deg, Dec -31.2695 to -20.5327 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7565 to 325.8970 deg, Dec -31.2695 to -20.5327 deg Loaded 7141 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4303 out of 4524 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4524 out of 30382 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.175900 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.175900 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.42 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 30382 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7565 to 325.8970 deg, Dec -31.2695 to -20.5327 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7565 to 325.8970 deg, Dec -31.2695 to -20.5327 deg Loaded 7141 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4303 out of 4524 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4524 out of 30382 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 30781 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7566 to 325.8990 deg, Dec -31.2689 to -20.5327 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7566 to 325.8990 deg, Dec -31.2689 to -20.5327 deg Loaded 7140 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4271 out of 4495 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4495 out of 30781 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (aperture=4.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 35 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits 2.1 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 2.6 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits 2.6 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.4 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits 14.4 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits 15.0 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.JWl0fORNP8 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1095, bad_region=5151, passed=30372 Got 30372 stars (including 24291 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30372 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26496 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26496 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26496 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5372) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.421 n_q1=1672 n_q2=798 n_q3=1567 n_q4=848 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.202 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4885 N_valid=4885 bias_ra_arcsec=-1.676 bias_dec_arcsec=1.489 median_sep_arcsec=3.686 p95_sep_arcsec=6.932 n_q1=1672 n_q2=798 n_q3=1567 n_q4=848 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.0t63Sjgimc (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1095, bad_region=5253, passed=30767 Got 30767 stars (including 24584 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30767 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26810 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26810 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26810 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 4887 stars left (next iteration limit 5374) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits N_match=4887 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.457 n_q1=1684 n_q2=796 n_q3=1563 n_q4=844 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4887 N_valid=4887 bias_ra_arcsec=-1.774 bias_dec_arcsec=1.474 median_sep_arcsec=3.881 p95_sep_arcsec=6.778 n_q1=1684 n_q2=796 n_q3=1563 n_q4=844 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.cNfkUDX44Y (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1915, bad_region=7566, passed=38193 Got 38193 stars (including 29393 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38193 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4854 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32451 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32451 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32451 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4854 stars left (next iteration limit 5339) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4854 robust_rms=7.282 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.040 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.040 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4854 robust_rms=0.411 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.847 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.847 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4854 robust_rms=0.369 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.519 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.519 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4854 robust_rms_before=0.891 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.361 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.369 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.584 worst_region_rms_after=0.519 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.040 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.519 SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 0.891 -> 0.369 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits is a symbolic link SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4854 pairs from the previous matching) UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4711 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4711 pairs (4854 from the previous matching) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4711 robust_rms=7.239 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.886 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.886 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4711 robust_rms=0.408 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.858 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.858 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4711 robust_rms=0.370 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.514 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.514 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4711 robust_rms_before=0.368 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.368 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.370 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.519 worst_region_rms_after=0.514 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.519 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.514 SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 0.368 -> 0.370 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits is a symbolic link Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32451 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32450 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits N_match=4711 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.441 n_q1=1540 n_q2=891 n_q3=1428 n_q4=852 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4711 N_valid=4711 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.353 bias_dec_arcsec=0.596 median_sep_arcsec=0.829 p95_sep_arcsec=1.551 n_q1=1540 n_q2=891 n_q3=1428 n_q4=852 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.JvU9cru1Ih (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2008, bad_region=7792, passed=38717 Got 38717 stars (including 29755 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38717 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32819 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32819 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32819 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4850 stars left (next iteration limit 5335) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=7.310 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.460 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.460 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=0.444 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.945 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.945 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=0.392 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.562 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.562 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4850 robust_rms_before=0.911 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.357 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.392 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.563 worst_region_rms_after=0.562 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.063 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.562 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.563 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.563 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.357 arcsec matched=4850 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits N_match=4850 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=1580 n_q2=917 n_q3=1478 n_q4=875 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4850 N_valid=4850 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.343 bias_dec_arcsec=0.612 median_sep_arcsec=0.833 p95_sep_arcsec=1.713 n_q1=1580 n_q2=917 n_q3=1478 n_q4=875 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:56:27.41 -26:12:41.2: 13.65 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:49:21.81 -23:00:37.6: 13.57 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:24:30.54 -25:39:41.5: 13.68 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:13:48.59 -30:12:29.9: 13.46 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:54:56.22 -22:18:29.9: 12.20 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:06:56.94 -24:59:33.3: 10.81 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:00:33.06 -22:15:33.9: 13.75 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:55:59.75 -22:38:34.1: 13.48 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:12:59.02 -22:49:33.5: 13.36 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:25:43.94 -28:48:19.3: 14.15 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:13:48.59 -30:12:29.9: 13.41 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:56:27.41 -26:12:41.2: 13.90 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:27.41 -26:12:41.2: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7390 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:54:56.22 -22:18:29.9: 12.16 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:13:48.59 -30:12:29.9: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4785 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:06:56.94 -24:59:33.3: 10.82 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:56.22 -22:18:29.9: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4394 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.82 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:06:56.94 -24:59:33.3: ref_mag=10.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8263 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:55:59.75 -22:38:34.1: 13.60 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:59.75 -22:38:34.1: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4972 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:49:21.81 -23:00:37.6: 13.48 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:21.81 -23:00:37.6: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.5262 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:24:30.54 -25:39:41.5: 13.87 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:12:59.02 -22:49:33.5: 13.47 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:24:30.54 -25:39:41.5: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5554 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:59.02 -22:49:33.5: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.3298 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:00:33.06 -22:15:33.9: 13.96 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:33.06 -22:15:33.9: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6436 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:25:43.94 -28:48:19.3: 14.02 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:25:43.94 -28:48:19.3: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6591 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:53:26.95 -21:43:29.3: 14.25 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:48:49.61 -25:11:29.9: 13.54 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:22:29.01 -25:09:52.2: 13.69 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:48:58.00 -22:26:45.8: 13.95 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:26:51.55 -30:05:59.2: 13.98 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:53:19.46 -25:03:39.1: 13.36 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:53:17.39 -22:39:11.7: 13.57 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:26:26.79 -30:06:48.2: 13.99 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:48:49.61 -25:11:29.9: 13.72 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:51:38.75 -25:11:33.8: 14.06 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:49.61 -25:11:29.9: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6443 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:55:53.75 -23:23:17.2: 13.68 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:53:26.95 -21:43:29.3: 13.82 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:48:58.00 -22:26:45.8: 13.86 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:22:29.01 -25:09:52.2: 13.61 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:29.01 -25:09:52.2: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6463 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:26.95 -21:43:29.3: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6770 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:58.00 -22:26:45.8: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7568 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:53:19.46 -25:03:39.1: 13.42 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:19.46 -25:03:39.1: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.6226 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:53:17.39 -22:39:11.7: 14.14 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:17.39 -22:39:11.7: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7145 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:51:38.75 -25:11:33.8: 14.05 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:26:51.55 -30:05:59.2: 13.84 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:38.75 -25:11:33.8: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6617 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:51.55 -30:05:59.2: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6293 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:26:26.79 -30:06:48.2: 14.13 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:26.79 -30:06:48.2: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7176 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:55:53.75 -23:23:17.2: 13.88 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:53.75 -23:23:17.2: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6785 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:26:38.97 -29:41:16.9: 13.87 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:26:31.40 -28:31:32.4: 13.81 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:51:35.79 -24:49:12.0: 13.81 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:59:41.22 -23:55:19.9: 13.98 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:56:31.40 -27:11:47.1: 13.73 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:09:59.36 -29:01:19.3: 13.77 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:27:32.60 -28:59:57.7: 13.75 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:25:11.89 -28:32:13.4: 14.09 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:26:38.97 -29:41:16.9: 13.93 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:38.97 -29:41:16.9: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6813 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:09:59.36 -29:01:19.3: 13.76 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:51:35.79 -24:49:12.0: 14.00 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:27:32.60 -28:59:57.7: 14.05 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:26:46.56 -29:49:48.3: 14.39 +/- 0.32 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:26:31.40 -28:31:32.4: 14.04 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:50:40.30 -30:03:52.0: 13.75 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:25:11.89 -28:32:13.4: 14.09 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:59:41.22 -23:55:19.9: 14.14 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:56:31.40 -27:11:47.1: 13.48 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:15:28.91 -29:58:40.6: 14.59 +/- 0.33 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:31.40 -28:31:32.4: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7070 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:35.79 -24:49:12.0: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7253 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:32.60 -28:59:57.7: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7127 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:09:59.36 -29:01:19.3: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6351 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:41.22 -23:55:19.9: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7260 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:25:11.89 -28:32:13.4: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8453 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:31.40 -27:11:47.1: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7234 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:26:46.56 -29:49:48.3: 14.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.32 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:46.56 -29:49:48.3: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.32 new_mean_mag=13.7799 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:15:28.91 -29:58:40.6: 14.07 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:50:40.30 -30:03:52.0: 13.92 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.18 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:15:28.91 -29:58:40.6: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.8478 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:40.30 -30:03:52.0: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7305 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:49:25.96 -29:30:49.9: 13.75 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:49:25.96 -29:30:49.9: 13.97 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:25.96 -29:30:49.9: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8284 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52352_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 52352_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.73    20:56:27.37 -26:12:41.3   6248 3334   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.75    20:56:27.45 -26:12:41.1   6243 3342   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52354_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 52354_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.65    21:25:43.95 -28:48:19.0   2330 4940   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.67    21:25:43.94 -28:48:19.7   2325 4949   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52356_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 52356_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.54    20:49:21.79 -23:00:37.1   7281 1419   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.51    20:49:21.83 -23:00:38.1   7275 1428   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52358_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 52358_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.41    21:12:59.00 -22:49:33.4   3983 1277   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.27    21:12:59.04 -22:49:33.5   3978 1286   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52838_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 52838_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    10.84    21:06:56.94 -24:59:33.2   4825 2584   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    10.81    21:06:56.95 -24:59:33.3   4820 2593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54188_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 54188_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    12.44    20:54:56.18 -22:18:29.6   6511 0974   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    12.44    20:54:56.25 -22:18:30.2   6505 0982   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56269_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 56269_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.46    20:55:59.80 -22:38:33.9   6357 1175   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.54    20:55:59.70 -22:38:34.3   6352 1183   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56420_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 56420_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.40    21:13:48.55 -30:12:29.7   3927 5747   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.61    21:13:48.64 -30:12:30.1   3922 5756   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56426_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 56426_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.51    21:24:30.52 -25:39:41.6   2430 3029   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.60    21:24:30.56 -25:39:41.5   2424 3038   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56633_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 56633_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.60    21:00:33.15 -22:15:33.6   5723 0933   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.69    21:00:32.98 -22:15:34.2   5718 0942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56762_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 56762_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.65    20:53:26.98 -21:43:29.3   6730 0623   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.71    20:53:26.91 -21:43:29.2   6724 0631   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56819_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 56819_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.64    21:22:29.03 -25:09:52.6   2698 2719   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.65    21:22:28.99 -25:09:51.8   2693 2728   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56860_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 56860_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.59    20:53:19.48 -25:03:38.4   6693 2648   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.66    20:53:19.44 -25:03:39.9   6687 2656   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56938_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 56938_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.59    20:48:49.62 -25:11:29.8   7309 2745   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.70    20:48:49.61 -25:11:30.1   7303 2753   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56954_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 56954_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.60    21:26:51.51 -30:05:59.6   2209 5735   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.67    21:26:51.59 -30:05:58.8   2204 5743   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57031_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 57031_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.69    20:48:58.10 -22:26:47.1   7348 1078   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.86    20:48:57.89 -22:26:44.5   7343 1086   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57045_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 57045_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.70    20:53:17.40 -22:39:11.9   6737 1189   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.73    20:53:17.37 -22:39:11.5   6731 1197   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57052_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 57052_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.64    20:51:38.86 -25:11:33.1   6921 2734   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.69    20:51:38.64 -25:11:34.6   6916 2742   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57060_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 57060_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.68    20:55:53.73 -23:23:17.5   6362 1628   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.68    20:55:53.78 -23:23:16.9   6356 1636   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57092_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 57092_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.64    21:26:26.84 -30:06:47.4   2263 5740   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.85    21:26:26.75 -30:06:49.1   2259 5749   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57152_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 57152_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.66    21:26:39.02 -29:41:16.7   2227 5482   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.71    21:26:38.92 -29:41:17.1   2222 5491   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57197_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 57197_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.67    20:56:31.42 -27:11:47.4   6227 3930   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.80    20:56:31.38 -27:11:46.9   6222 3938   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57218_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 57218_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.71    20:51:35.82 -24:49:11.9   6934 2508   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.75    20:51:35.77 -24:49:12.0   6929 2517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57256_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 57256_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.73    20:59:41.19 -23:55:20.3   5829 1943   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.72    20:59:41.25 -23:55:19.6   5824 1951   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57271_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 57271_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.71    21:26:31.36 -28:31:32.7   2218 4775   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.71    21:26:31.43 -28:31:32.1   2213 4783   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57273_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 57273_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.71    21:27:32.60 -28:59:58.4   2093 5069   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.72    21:27:32.61 -28:59:57.0   2088 5077   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57387_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 57387_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.73    21:25:11.92 -28:32:13.0   2396 4774   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    14.05    21:25:11.86 -28:32:13.8   2391 4783   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57457_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 57457_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.67    21:09:59.41 -29:01:19.1   4423 5021   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.61    21:09:59.31 -29:01:19.5   4418 5030   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57476_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 57476_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.74    21:26:46.66 -29:49:48.4   2213 5570   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.83    21:26:46.47 -29:49:48.3   2209 5578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57481_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 57481_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.68    20:50:40.31 -30:03:51.9   6964 5691   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.82    20:50:40.30 -30:03:52.2   6959 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57649_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 57649_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.84    21:15:28.89 -29:58:40.6   3705 5611   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.86    21:15:28.94 -29:58:40.7   3700 5620   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57885_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 57885_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 03.08162    2461347.58162    13.74    20:49:25.95 -29:30:50.1   7138 5362   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-57-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0088.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    13.96    20:49:25.97 -29:30:49.8   7133 5370   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 11253_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 11253_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    11.25    21:02:20.93 -27:05:13.5   5439 3860   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits **** FOUND 21:02:20.93 -27:05:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 28924_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 28924_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    10.23    21:07:36.65 -23:55:15.0   4729 1945   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits **** FOUND 21:07:36.66 -23:55:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 03065_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 The candidate 03065_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 11 03.08233    2461347.58233    9.37    21:26:43.99 -29:51:04.2   2215 5591   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_200314_TTUQ2b1x1_110211_uM6eQV1F/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_19-58-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits **** FOUND 21:26:43.99 -29:51:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 13s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Cap-05-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461347.58161705 -observatory V36 14:44:09.81 -16:49:26.5 Mercury (5.1mag) 13:25:42.22 -13:41:40.8 Venus (-4.3mag) 09:28:58.04 +16:35:47.5 Mars (0.8mag) 09:46:57.33 +14:06:45.7 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:36:29.20 +01:00:59.3 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:09:04.68 +20:50:14.9 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:08:21.36 -00:38:08.8 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:27.77 -23:41:35.6 Pluto (14.5mag) 09:52:47.61 +12:14:21.9 Moon (-10.0mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Nov 2 21:52 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461347.58161705: 09:46:57.12 +14:06:47.8 Io (6.0mag) 09:46:54.02 +14:07:07.1 Europa (6.1mag) 09:47:13.10 +14:05:15.2 Ganymede (5.5mag) 09:47:25.61 +14:04:04.4 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:48:23.11 +14:16:27.7 Himalia (15.5mag) 09:46:59.52 +14:06:33.6 Thebe (16.3mag) 09:46:42.30 +14:31:45.4 Elara (17.4mag) 09:47:44.37 +13:34:19.1 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 09:44:00.11 +14:38:37.4 Carme (18.7mag) 00:36:36.97 +01:00:29.8 Titan (8.3mag) 00:36:31.90 +01:00:56.4 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:36:59.03 +01:01:34.4 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:36:16.98 +01:00:41.9 Hyperion (14.2mag) 00:34:42.47 +00:48:49.1 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Nov 2 21:53 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461347.58161705: 04:35:22.94 +17:22:23.5 JWST 11:05:18.22 +47:11:04.6 Chandra 04:44:22.92 +49:28:37.4 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Nov 2 21:52 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461347.58161705 -observatory V36 03:33:54.08 +19:57:16.7 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:46:31.88 +38:21:38.0 17.9mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill) 07:46:37.24 +38:21:25.0 17.9mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 07:45:55.85 +38:21:44.6 17.9mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill) 05:01:59.85 +39:09:58.1 17.8mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski) 18:47:42.46 -32:53:16.0 15.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:45:16.90 -73:53:06.2 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:11:34.21 +35:17:58.3 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 07:35:41.05 +25:20:21.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:08:32.63 +38:29:00.2 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:36:47.48 +40:52:31.2 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:43:10.20 -13:33:41.5 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 14:14:54.63 -04:33:43.4 16.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 20:13:31.67 +53:18:10.7 15.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 13:07:16.70 +16:56:24.0 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:01:22.63 -65:13:04.6 14.5mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 19:33:44.69 -05:21:53.0 17.1mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS) 23:29:41.09 +14:08:42.8 16.8mag 2P/Encke 23:25:38.91 -25:52:13.7 15.4mag 10P/Tempel 02:39:35.75 +30:44:41.7 16.3mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:25:57.24 -10:00:34.0 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:10:48.02 -09:01:42.8 15.8mag 65P/Gunn 07:59:56.95 +13:37:09.3 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 08:58:42.69 +45:52:38.5 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:50:31.28 +05:43:14.9 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 12:26:14.79 +08:07:10.3 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 19:49:42.95 +14:19:34.6 10.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 11:11:28.65 -03:02:55.1 16.2mag 169P/NEAT 09:41:26.27 +23:30:45.5 18.0mag 186P/Garradd 03:11:01.50 +02:12:43.2 15.3mag 220P/McNaught 06:22:37.68 +49:42:38.5 15.6mag 260P/McNaught 07:56:08.68 +25:04:52.5 17.6mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.6K Nov 2 21:52 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92 10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27 21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82 01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9 01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88 00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77 22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42 01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3 18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.89 -10:37:05.90 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.05 15.79 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Nov 2 21:52 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag 05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag 05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Nov 2 21:52 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 17:53:52.220 +41:47:24.16 AT 2026afqm 2026-10-16.83 19.331 06:23:17.419 +70:33:15.10 SN 2026afql 2026-10-17.15 18.737 02:38:36.934 +41:55:58.84 AT 2026afqk 2026-10-17.04 19.369 05:26:14.588 -27:06:01.24 AT 2026afqj 2026-10-17.29 19.31 02:01:09.758 -36:18:14.69 AT 2026afqi 2026-10-12.26 19.361 09:44:49.328 +38:11:23.47 SN 2026afqh 2026-10-17.22 18.467 17:38:02.102 +55:52:14.30 AT 2026afqg 2026-10-16.84 19.253 02:35:38.526 -36:21:14.39 AT 2026afqf 2026-10-17.25 19.522 00:43:30.828 +41:26:55.48 AT 2026afqe 2026-10-17.57 18.61 00:25:27.859 +20:14:37.33 SN 2026afqd 2026-10-17.09 19.18 08:07:08.624 +06:16:20.09 SN 2026afqc 2026-10-11.25 19.94 04:47:31.739 +04:21:53.97 SN 2026afqb 2026-10-05.43 20.6842 03:07:45.440 -28:00:44.28 AT 2026afqa 2026-09-13.29 19.318 05:09:31.456 +75:44:45.10 AT 2026afpz 2026-10-11.55 19.477 07:54:22.348 +45:24:44.35 AT 2026afpy 2026-10-14.57 19.243 09:05:20.790 -70:27:10.93 AT 2026afpx 2026-10-15.10 18.44 19:07:21.022 +39:54:50.78 AT 2026afpw 2026-10-14.27 19.073 18:53:58.015 +34:24:21.77 AT 2026afpv 2026-10-13.86 18.776 18:40:01.554 -27:06:46.60 AT 2026afpu 2026-10-05.24 18.99 20:21:05.817 +62:24:12.13 AT 2026afpt 2026-10-16.29 19.142 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Nov 2 21:52 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 87 C