This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.0378 2461347.5378 13.46 17:31:02.67 -18:18:56.7
7.26474 8.45549 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.1" and 4.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J173102.45-181855.7
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.276 Ic Y 4.066 Ic 2457949.00000 191.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 17:31:02.67 -18:18:56.7: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 17:31:02.67 -18:18:56.7: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J173102.45-181855.7,2461347.5378,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J173102.45-181855.7 20261103.0378 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.0378 2461347.5378 13.39 17:58:42.29 -18:15:06.9
10.72363 2.86326 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 4.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V4671 Sgr
Type: M:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.500 w 12.800 w
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 17:58:42.29 -18:15:06.9: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 17:58:42.29 -18:15:06.9: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V4671 Sgr,2461347.5378,13.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V4671 Sgr 20261103.0378 13.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.0378 2461347.5378 13.29 17:34:30.04 -17:49:22.9
8.12781 8.02197 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.6 pix
The object was found in VSX16" Gaia DR3 4123460288376820480
Type: S
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.820 G 18.420 G
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris -0 -0 1 13.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 17:34:30.04 -17:49:22.9: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 17:34:30.04 -17:49:22.9: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4123460288376820480,2461347.5378,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4123460288376820480 20261103.0378 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.0378 2461347.5378 13.50 17:37:03.70 -17:03:31.3
9.10869 7.90518 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.5" and 4.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J173703.82-170330.2
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.400 V < 17.200 V 2457898.00000 248.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 17:37:03.70 -17:03:31.3: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 17:37:03.70 -17:03:31.3: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J173703.82-170330.2,2461347.5378,13.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J173703.82-170330.2 20261103.0378 13.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.0378 2461347.5378 13.59 17:40:26.45 -21:14:22.6
5.94876 5.03111 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 4.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J174026.41-211422.2
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.200 V 16.850 V 2457173.00000 262.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 17:40:26.45 -21:14:22.6: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 17:40:26.45 -21:14:22.6: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J174026.41-211422.2,2461347.5378,13.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J174026.41-211422.2 20261103.0378 13.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.0378 2461347.5378 13.10 17:45:02.04 -19:27:36.3
8.03663 5.03919 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" ASASSN-V J174501.77-192733.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.610 V 14.820 V 2457818.20000 410.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 17:45:02.04 -19:27:36.3: 14.49 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 17:45:02.04 -19:27:36.3: 14.65 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.13
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J174501.77-192733.6,2461347.5378,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J174501.77-192733.6 20261103.0378 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.0378 2461347.5378 12.81 17:35:26.98 -18:15:03.1
7.88165 7.60429 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 4.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V0443 Oph
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.800 V < 15.000 V 2453050.00000 258.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 17:35:26.98 -18:15:03.1: 14.26 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 17:35:26.98 -18:15:03.1: 14.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0443 Oph,2461347.5378,12.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0443 Oph 20261103.0378 12.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.73850483 13.07.2026 05:43:16.817 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
First image: 2461234.73850483 13.07.2026 05:43:16.817 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Last image: 2461347.53809601 03.11.2026 00:54:41.495 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13046
Objects passed selection criteria: 13016
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10444.2
Average stars matched: 10209.5 (97.7524 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239736 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Nov 2 19:00:36 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.73850483 13.07.2026 05:43:16.817 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
First image: 2461234.73850483 13.07.2026 05:43:16.817 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Last image: 2461347.53809601 03.11.2026 00:54:41.495 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 185
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 66 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 136487
Objects passed selection criteria: 136270
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 114824
Average stars matched: 110267 (96.0317 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 546364 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Nov 2 19:02:47 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.53747020
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:38.439 -17:59:57.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:39.714 -18:00:21.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:38.439 -17:59:57.88
Second-epoch image center 17:46:39.714 -18:00:21.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0084 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:39.183 -18:00:47.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:38.439 -17:59:57.88
Second-epoch image center 17:46:39.183 -18:00:47.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0141 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:46:39.714 -18:00:21.95
Second-epoch second image center 17:46:39.183 -18:00:47.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00737 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d1XpYaZlao
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mrImwi8pnn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XBqo8OgX4h
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4LCNqJbccy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16891 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 258.2173 to 275.1482 deg, Dec -23.2648 to -12.6503 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 258.2173 to 275.1482 deg, Dec -23.2648 to -12.6503 deg
Loaded 14528 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9942 out of 10677 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10677 out of 16891 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.616150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.616150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.88
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.88
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16891 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 258.2173 to 275.1482 deg, Dec -23.2648 to -12.6503 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 258.2173 to 275.1482 deg, Dec -23.2648 to -12.6503 deg
Loaded 14528 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9942 out of 10677 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10677 out of 16891 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 16776 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 258.2171 to 275.1478 deg, Dec -23.2629 to -12.6502 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 258.2171 to 275.1478 deg, Dec -23.2629 to -12.6502 deg
Loaded 14527 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9906 out of 10653 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10653 out of 16776 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
14.9 mag. Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.d1XpYaZlao (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1553, bad_region=2764, passed=16891
Got 16891 stars (including 12690 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16891 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4743 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4743 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4742 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4742 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 4742 stars left (next iteration limit 5217)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits N_match=4742 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.573 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.601 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.684 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.556 n_q1=1502 n_q2=753 n_q3=1937 n_q4=550 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4742 N_valid=4742 bias_ra_arcsec=0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.424 p95_sep_arcsec=5.222 n_q1=1502 n_q2=753 n_q3=1937 n_q4=550 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits -region wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.mrImwi8pnn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1577, bad_region=2742, passed=16776
Got 16776 stars (including 12569 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16776 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4740 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4740 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Excluding outliers - 4741 stars left (next iteration limit 5214)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits N_match=4741 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.660 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.653 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.717 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.586 n_q1=1499 n_q2=757 n_q3=1932 n_q4=553 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4741 N_valid=4741 bias_ra_arcsec=0.024 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.442 p95_sep_arcsec=4.928 n_q1=1499 n_q2=757 n_q3=1932 n_q4=553 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits -region wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.XBqo8OgX4h (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=682, bad_region=1047, passed=7764
Got 7764 stars (including 6082 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7764 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4737 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4737 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4732 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4731 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Excluding outliers - 4731 stars left (next iteration limit 5210)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4731 robust_rms=7.144 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.022 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=7.986 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4731 robust_rms=0.702 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.953 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.953 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4731 robust_rms=0.606 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.864 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.864 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4731 robust_rms_before=0.837 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.657 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.606 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.019 worst_region_rms_after=0.864 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.019 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.864
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.sip_refit.R29D1S/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.sip_refit.R29D1S/candidate.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:39.702 -18:00:22.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7764 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.sip_refit.R29D1S/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_631231.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.sip_refit.R29D1S/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.3HXqaS' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_631231.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.837 -> 0.606 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4731 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4414 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4414 pairs (4731 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4414 robust_rms=6.759 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.241 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=6.852 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4414 robust_rms=0.690 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.873 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.873 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4414 robust_rms=0.589 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.819 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.819 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4414 robust_rms_before=0.589 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.589 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.589 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.826 worst_region_rms_after=0.819 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.826 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.819
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.sip_refit.H60Ua3/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.sip_refit.H60Ua3/candidate.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:39.702 -18:00:22.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7764 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.sip_refit.H60Ua3/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_635534.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.sip_refit.H60Ua3/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.9nRWlp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_635534.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.589 -> 0.589 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4414 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4414 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits N_match=4414 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.612 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.689 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.639 n_q1=1398 n_q2=680 n_q3=1844 n_q4=492 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4414 N_valid=4414 bias_ra_arcsec=0.012 bias_dec_arcsec=0.000 median_sep_arcsec=0.494 p95_sep_arcsec=1.389 n_q1=1398 n_q2=680 n_q3=1844 n_q4=492 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4LCNqJbccy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=722, bad_region=1124, passed=8336
Got 8336 stars (including 6535 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8336 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4739 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4737 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Excluding outliers - 4737 stars left (next iteration limit 5212)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4737 robust_rms=7.299 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.091 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=8.027 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4737 robust_rms=0.705 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.023 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.023 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4737 robust_rms=0.602 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.897 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.897 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4737 robust_rms_before=0.851 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.676 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.602 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.006 worst_region_rms_after=0.897 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.006 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.897
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.sip_refit.MXPaNl/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.sip_refit.MXPaNl/candidate.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:39.162 -18:00:47.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 8336 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.sip_refit.MXPaNl/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_631257.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.sip_refit.MXPaNl/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.tR4l1Q' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_631257.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.851 -> 0.602 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4737 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4411 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4411 pairs (4737 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4411 robust_rms=6.875 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.432 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=7.136 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4411 robust_rms=0.688 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.941 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.941 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4411 robust_rms=0.588 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.855 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.855 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4411 robust_rms_before=0.587 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.587 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.588 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.855 worst_region_rms_after=0.855 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.855 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.855
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.sip_refit.JFADOu/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.sip_refit.JFADOu/candidate.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:39.161 -18:00:47.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 8336 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.sip_refit.JFADOu/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_635518.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.sip_refit.JFADOu/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.Y9KnFU' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_635518.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.587 -> 0.588 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4411 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4411 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7395 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits N_match=4411 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.719 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.554 n_q1=1419 n_q2=671 n_q3=1828 n_q4=493 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4411 N_valid=4411 bias_ra_arcsec=0.013 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.491 p95_sep_arcsec=1.409 n_q1=1419 n_q2=671 n_q3=1828 n_q4=493 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits sigma_overall=0.629 worst_q_ratio=1.088
ref2=Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits sigma_overall=0.660 worst_q_ratio=1.087
new1=fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits sigma_overall=0.612 worst_q_ratio=1.125
new2=fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits sigma_overall=0.596 worst_q_ratio=1.205
reference average sigma_overall=0.6445 worst_q_ratio=1.0875
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009_astrometric_residuals.png (4742 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.59 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010_astrometric_residuals.png (4741 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.61 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020_astrometric_residuals.png (4414 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021_astrometric_residuals.png (4411 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20911_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 20911_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:33.06 -13:53:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20915_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 20915_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:08.71 -21:45:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20926_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 20926_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:40.28 -13:48:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20927_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 20927_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:11.92 -20:51:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:38.439 -17:59:57.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:39.702 -18:00:22.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:38.439 -17:59:57.88
Second-epoch image center 17:46:39.702 -18:00:22.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0084 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:39.161 -18:00:47.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:38.439 -17:59:57.88
Second-epoch image center 17:46:39.161 -18:00:47.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0141 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:46:39.702 -18:00:22.35
Second-epoch second image center 17:46:39.161 -18:00:47.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00735 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mEACDf417S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3eHvRKv1k2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vs0IaAwUxj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rIquDyzOUP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 175805 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 258.1779 to 275.1496 deg, Dec -23.2647 to -12.6264 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 258.1779 to 275.1496 deg, Dec -23.2647 to -12.6264 deg
Loaded 14569 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9718 out of 12724 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12724 out of 175805 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.405150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.405150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.98
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.98
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 175805 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 258.1779 to 275.1496 deg, Dec -23.2647 to -12.6264 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 258.1779 to 275.1496 deg, Dec -23.2647 to -12.6264 deg
Loaded 14569 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9718 out of 12724 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12724 out of 175805 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits (aperture=4.3)
Read 177425 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 258.1785 to 275.1495 deg, Dec -23.2635 to -12.6266 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 258.1785 to 275.1495 deg, Dec -23.2635 to -12.6266 deg
Loaded 14567 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9707 out of 12711 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12711 out of 177425 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits (aperture=4.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 120 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
2.0 pix Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
15.0 mag. Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.mEACDf417S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=19316, bad_region=23951, passed=175796
Got 175796 stars (including 134363 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 175796 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4743 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 157425 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 157425 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4738 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 157425 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 4738 stars left (next iteration limit 5215)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits N_match=4738 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.641 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.568 n_q1=1506 n_q2=762 n_q3=1861 n_q4=609 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.072
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4738 N_valid=4738 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.418 p95_sep_arcsec=3.383 n_q1=1506 n_q2=762 n_q3=1861 n_q4=609 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits -region wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.3eHvRKv1k2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=19479, bad_region=24120, passed=177412
Got 177412 stars (including 135666 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 177412 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4743 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4743 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 158876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 158876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 158875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 4741 stars left (next iteration limit 5217)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits N_match=4741 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.625 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.669 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.581 n_q1=1503 n_q2=755 n_q3=1883 n_q4=600 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4741 N_valid=4741 bias_ra_arcsec=0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.426 p95_sep_arcsec=3.394 n_q1=1503 n_q2=755 n_q3=1883 n_q4=600 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits -region wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vs0IaAwUxj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=5910, bad_region=7146, passed=83693
Got 83693 stars (including 70930 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 83693 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4743 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4740 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78124 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4742 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78124 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4742 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78123 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 4742 stars left (next iteration limit 5214)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4742 robust_rms=7.136 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.856 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=8.103 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4742 robust_rms=0.704 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.008 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.008 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4742 robust_rms=0.600 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.875 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.875 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4742 robust_rms_before=0.595 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.629 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.600 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.865 worst_region_rms_after=0.875 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.865 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.875
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.865 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.865 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.595 arcsec matched=4742
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits N_match=4742 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.617 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.610 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.692 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.510 n_q1=1536 n_q2=739 n_q3=1937 n_q4=530 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.121
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4742 N_valid=4742 bias_ra_arcsec=0.014 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.000 median_sep_arcsec=0.517 p95_sep_arcsec=4.033 n_q1=1536 n_q2=739 n_q3=1937 n_q4=530 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.rIquDyzOUP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=6531, bad_region=7656, passed=87733
Got 87733 stars (including 73919 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 87733 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4744 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4744 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4742 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 4741 stars left (next iteration limit 5218)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4741 robust_rms=7.253 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.945 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=8.155 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4741 robust_rms=0.703 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.017 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.017 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4741 robust_rms=0.600 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.899 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.899 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4741 robust_rms_before=0.597 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.636 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.600 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.904 worst_region_rms_after=0.899 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.904 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.899
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.904 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.904 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.597 arcsec matched=4741
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits N_match=4741 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.617 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.597 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.692 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.506 n_q1=1526 n_q2=750 n_q3=1940 n_q4=525 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4741 N_valid=4741 bias_ra_arcsec=0.018 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.508 p95_sep_arcsec=3.987 n_q1=1526 n_q2=750 n_q3=1940 n_q4=525 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-53-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-02_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_185517_TTUQ2b1x1_481673_QXmSGovw/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 17:43:18.47 -17:05:36.5: 13.97 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 17:41:46.95 -16:46:08.0: 13.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 18:10:23.34 -21:41:00.4: 13.86 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 18:04:58.35 -22:05:23.6: 13.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 17:50:06.19 -17:53:50.9: 12.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 18:11:19.54 -20:18:50.0: 13.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 18:14:13.24 -18:54:28.2: 13.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 18:10:56.48 -15:42:33.2: 12.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 17:59:42.75 -21:32:35.4: 12.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 18:11:19.54 -20:18:50.0: 13.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 18:10:23.34 -21:41:00.4: 13.57 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:11:19.54 -20:18:50.0: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4353 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 17:43:18.47 -17:05:36.5: 14.09 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 17:50:06.19 -17:53:50.9: 13.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 18:14:13.24 -18:54:28.2: 13.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:10:23.34 -21:41:00.4: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6255 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 18:04:58.35 -22:05:23.6: 13.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 17:41:46.95 -16:46:08.0: 13.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:43:18.47 -17:05:36.5: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7880 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:14:13.24 -18:54:28.2: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2972 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:50:06.19 -17:53:50.9: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1772 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:04:58.35 -22:05:23.6: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3617 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:41:46.95 -16:46:08.0: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4115 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 18:04:13.31 -20:53:08.6: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 18:10:56.48 -15:42:33.2: 12.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:10:56.48 -15:42:33.2: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8858 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 17:59:42.75 -21:32:35.4: 12.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:59:42.75 -21:32:35.4: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7316 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 18:04:13.31 -20:53:08.6: 12.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:04:13.31 -20:53:08.6: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4107 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 18:12:32.66 -18:46:40.1: 12.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 18:13:07.35 -21:37:14.5: 12.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 18:15:23.02 -18:54:28.5: 12.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 18:12:32.66 -18:46:40.1: 12.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:12:32.66 -18:46:40.1: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1893 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 18:13:07.35 -21:37:14.5: 12.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:13:07.35 -21:37:14.5: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3065 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 18:15:23.47 -18:54:02.3: 12.40 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 17:33:33.42 -22:11:12.0: 12.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 18:15:23.02 -18:54:28.5: 12.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:15:23.02 -18:54:28.5: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2702 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 18:08:45.65 -21:24:25.5: 13.00 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 18:15:23.47 -18:54:02.3: 12.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 18:08:54.27 -21:14:08.3: 13.02 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:15:23.47 -18:54:02.3: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.4322 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 18:06:30.21 -21:08:43.5: 13.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 17:33:33.42 -22:11:12.0: 12.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:33:33.42 -22:11:12.0: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6135 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 18:08:45.65 -21:24:25.5: 12.90 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 18:12:58.88 -19:13:53.8: 12.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:08:45.65 -21:24:25.5: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.6982 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 18:06:30.21 -21:08:43.5: 13.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 18:08:54.27 -21:14:08.3: 13.05 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:06:30.21 -21:08:43.5: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8925 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:08:54.27 -21:14:08.3: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.7669 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 18:12:58.88 -19:13:53.8: 13.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:12:58.88 -19:13:53.8: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8810 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 17:36:02.59 -13:59:11.7: 13.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 18:13:05.97 -19:14:26.7: 13.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 17:36:02.59 -13:59:11.7: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:36:02.59 -13:59:11.7: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0657 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 18:13:05.97 -19:14:26.7: 13.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:13:05.97 -19:14:26.7: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0267 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 17:31:02.67 -18:18:56.7: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 17:58:42.29 -18:15:06.9: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 18:15:20.94 -21:29:40.4: 13.72 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 18:05:55.19 -19:57:29.3: 13.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 17:34:30.04 -17:49:22.9: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 17:54:44.44 -15:32:13.1: 13.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 17:31:02.67 -18:18:56.7: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 17:58:42.29 -18:15:06.9: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 17:37:03.70 -17:03:31.3: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 18:15:20.94 -21:29:40.4: 13.82 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 18:05:55.19 -19:57:29.3: 13.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 17:34:30.04 -17:49:22.9: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:15:20.94 -21:29:40.4: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.4615 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:05:55.19 -19:57:29.3: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2810 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 17:54:44.44 -15:32:13.1: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:54:44.44 -15:32:13.1: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4451 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 17:37:03.70 -17:03:31.3: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 17:40:26.45 -21:14:22.6: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 17:40:26.45 -21:14:22.6: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 17:45:02.04 -19:27:36.3: 14.49 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 17:45:02.04 -19:27:36.3: 14.65 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:45:02.04 -19:27:36.3: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.0939 delta=1.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-16_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 17:35:26.98 -18:15:03.1: 14.26 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_00-43-43_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 17:35:26.98 -18:15:03.1: 14.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:35:26.98 -18:15:03.1: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.8108 delta=1.41 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out121888.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out203638.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out203644.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out203654.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out203665.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out203706.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99281.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 60s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203322_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203322_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203334_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203334_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203342_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203342_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203345_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203345_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203355_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203355_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203358_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203358_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203359_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203359_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203368_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203368_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203369_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203369_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203374_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203374_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:37.66 -21:59:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203378_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203378_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:37.34 -19:03:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203382_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203382_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:55:54.57 -19:24:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203384_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203384_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:42.69 -15:50:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203392_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203392_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:00.67 -19:48:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203408_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203408_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203410_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203410_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203416_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203416_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203428_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203428_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:49.89 -18:48:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203429_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203429_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203435_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203435_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203448_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203448_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203450_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203450_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203454_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203454_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:40.35 -13:48:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203465_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203465_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:26.80 -15:24:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203469_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203469_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203474_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203474_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:32.49 -15:11:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203476_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203476_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:14.67 -14:20:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203496_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203496_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:45.16 -21:01:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203497_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203497_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203500_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203500_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203502_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203502_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:06.65 -14:25:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203504_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203504_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203505_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203505_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:08.22 -21:27:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203510_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203510_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:14.62 -18:58:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203521_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203521_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:11.63 -15:20:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203523_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203523_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:32.58 -18:40:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203529_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203529_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:25.94 -15:09:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203530_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203530_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203534_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203534_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203535_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203535_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203537_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203537_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:04.56 -20:51:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203545_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203545_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203546_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203546_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:53.12 -21:36:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203547_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203547_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:50.84 -19:04:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203548_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203548_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:06.16 -13:57:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203551_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203551_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203556_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203556_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:39.65 -19:31:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203560_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203560_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:12.86 -15:19:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203563_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203563_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:29.55 -14:52:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203568_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203568_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:38.55 -14:39:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203572_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203572_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:18.41 -20:54:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203580_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203580_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203587_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203587_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:17.25 -14:02:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203589_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203589_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203591_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203591_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:37.10 -17:40:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203592_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203592_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:33.57 -14:03:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203596_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203596_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203599_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203599_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:22.84 -16:40:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203602_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203602_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:54.13 -14:37:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203610_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203610_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:19.96 -14:59:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203614_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203614_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:07.48 -13:51:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203617_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203617_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203618_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203618_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:09.10 -20:27:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203621_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203621_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:03.85 -13:49:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203623_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203623_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:09.62 -18:11:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203624_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203624_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:49.40 -18:25:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203625_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203625_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:56.39 -17:40:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203629_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203629_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:02.96 -18:45:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203634_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203634_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:58.39 -20:57:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203638_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 203638_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203642_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203642_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:59.29 -16:00:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203644_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 203644_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203648_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203648_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:07.52 -15:19:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203649_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203649_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203651_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203651_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:11.40 -16:38:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203654_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 203654_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203655_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203655_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203656_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203656_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:53.04 -16:04:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203657_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203657_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203658_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203658_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:13.94 -21:51:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203663_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203663_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:04.78 -18:39:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203664_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203664_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:36.38 -16:19:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203665_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 203665_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203667_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203667_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203672_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203672_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203673_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203673_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:37.39 -17:08:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203685_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203685_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:32.98 -17:21:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203691_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203691_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:46.59 -17:52:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203694_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203694_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:30.52 -18:00:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203695_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203695_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:04.75 -18:11:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203696_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203696_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:24.95 -14:55:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203706_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 203706_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203708_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203708_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:32.49 -16:14:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203710_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203710_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203713_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203713_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:59.08 -17:28:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203721_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 203721_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:06.53 -16:01:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72879_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 72879_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:39.29 -16:59:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148704_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 148704_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:56.55 -19:47:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121888_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 121888_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38272_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 38272_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:56.02 -15:21:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83349_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 83349_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:13.48 -17:32:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187234_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 187234_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:59.27 -18:53:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139837_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 139837_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:32.79 -20:22:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15008_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 15008_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:33.05 -13:53:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66396_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 66396_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:20.58 -16:41:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102104_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 102104_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:17.54 -18:24:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196558_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 196558_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:05.03 -15:30:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104318_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 104318_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:28.43 -18:28:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83595_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 83595_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:24.94 -17:31:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87383_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 87383_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:18.37 -17:42:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149566_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 149566_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:04.15 -19:43:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11959_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 11959_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:52.70 -13:43:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170252_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 170252_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:08.70 -21:45:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21412_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 21412_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:15.27 -14:22:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22497_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 22497_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:43.83 -14:26:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118908_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 118908_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:49.66 -19:15:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99281_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 99281_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133111_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 133111_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:11.94 -20:51:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48225_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 48225_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:48.63 -15:50:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65457_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 65457_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-11-02_18-54-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
