FITS images used in this processing run:

Field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461058.83373419 18.01.2026 08:00:24.634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
First image: 2461058.83373419 18.01.2026 08:00:24.634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Last  image: 2461341.82770350 28.10.2026 07:51:43.582   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.19
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  7394
Objects passed selection criteria:  7348
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.5    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.5    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 4771.5
Average stars matched: 4654.75 (97.5532 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   233700 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed Oct 28 02:57:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461058.83373419 18.01.2026 08:00:24.634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
First image: 2461058.83373419 18.01.2026 08:00:24.634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Last  image: 2461341.82770350 28.10.2026 07:51:43.582   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 66
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -6.94
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  38134
Objects passed selection criteria:  38020
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.5    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.5    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 25163
Average stars matched: 24370 (96.8485 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   260960 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed Oct 28 02:58:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=esa_tap (lib/gaia_dr2_cone_search.sh -> ESA Gaia Archive TAP service)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
LMi-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting LMi-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing LMi-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 202031 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 202031 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.png' -> 'transient_report/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits_preview.png'

LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits


renamed 'LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.png' -> 'transient_report/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits_preview.png'

LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 448.9815
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 551.8028
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4874.9329
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1032.5313
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4841.7198
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1026.2000
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 10.8578
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.006
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 15.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-28T02:50:41.8701293' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-28T07:50:41.8701293' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61341.3268734952 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-28T07:50:51.7731512' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61341.3269881136 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     147.271474452856 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     38.0002014918283 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     16.3538888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     55.0119444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     3.51079667770745 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'LMi-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 49 06'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 14.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 92.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               903.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 15.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 20.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            13.701096 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits :)

Spent 0.550502 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 15.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-28T02:51:43.5827399' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-28T07:51:43.5827399' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61341.3275877545 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-28T07:51:53.4848296' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61341.3277023612 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     147.271474328585 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     38.0002015465086 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     16.5305555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     55.1194444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     3.47521868701447 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'LMi-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 49 06'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 14.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 92.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               903.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 15.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 20.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            13.701096 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits :)

Spent 0.542405 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits



fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461341.82698924
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:06.265 +38:00:05.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Image size: 944.4'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:15.022 +37:58:39.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:49:06.265 +38:00:05.29
Second-epoch image center 09:49:15.022 +37:58:39.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0374 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Image size: 944.3'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:12.735 +37:58:38.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:49:06.265 +38:00:05.29
Second-epoch image center 09:49:12.735 +37:58:38.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0322 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  09:49:15.022 +37:58:39.34
Second-epoch second image center 09:49:12.735 +37:58:38.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00752 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits &> /tmp/tmp.txJmdWfe1e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vBQIpc6UBT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6qehtSIurw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4M2bENLQlx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits) and catalog (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3440 to 157.6118 deg, Dec +32.0322 to +43.3727 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3440 to 157.6118 deg, Dec 32.0322 to 43.3727 deg
Loaded 5364 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3768 out of 3968 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3968 out of 7760 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.905950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.905950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.19
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.72

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.72

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3440 to 157.6118 deg, Dec +32.0322 to +43.3727 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3440 to 157.6118 deg, Dec 32.0322 to 43.3727 deg
Loaded 5364 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3768 out of 3968 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3968 out of 7760 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 7740 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3423 to 157.6117 deg, Dec +32.0092 to +43.3728 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3423 to 157.6117 deg, Dec 32.0092 to 43.3728 deg
Loaded 5378 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3732 out of 3971 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3971 out of 7740 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
 2.2 pix  LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
 3.2 pix  fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
 3.2 pix  fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.7 mag.  LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
 15.7 mag.  LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
 13.1 mag.  fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
 13.1 mag.  fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  13.1 (SNR )  10.6 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.txJmdWfe1e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=529, bad_region=0, passed=7760
Got 7760 stars (including 7222 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7760 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4788 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4783 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4788 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Excluding outliers - 4783 stars left (next iteration limit 5261)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits N_match=4783 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.223 n_q1=1246 n_q2=1087 n_q3=1261 n_q4=1189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.352
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4783 N_valid=4783 bias_ra_arcsec=0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.225 p95_sep_arcsec=0.640 n_q1=1246 n_q2=1087 n_q3=1261 n_q4=1189 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vBQIpc6UBT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=564, bad_region=0, passed=7740
Got 7740 stars (including 7160 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7740 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4788 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4783 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4788 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 4783 stars left (next iteration limit 5261)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits N_match=4783 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=1258 n_q2=1088 n_q3=1255 n_q4=1182 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4783 N_valid=4783 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.310 p95_sep_arcsec=0.811 n_q1=1258 n_q2=1088 n_q3=1255 n_q4=1182 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.6qehtSIurw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=130, bad_region=0, passed=1832
Got 1832 stars (including 1701 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1832 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013117 (47.2 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010493 (37.8 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1626 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1626 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1626 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1625 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1625 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1625 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 1625 stars left (next iteration limit 1788)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1625 robust_rms=11.454 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.330 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.330 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1625 robust_rms=0.712 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.039 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.039 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1625 robust_rms=0.425 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.618 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.510 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1625 robust_rms_before=1.580 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.350 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.425 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.677 worst_region_rms_after=0.618 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.790 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.510
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.677 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.677 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.350 arcsec matched=1625
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits N_match=1625 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=487 n_q2=250 n_q3=504 n_q4=384 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.800
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=1625 N_valid=1625 bias_ra_arcsec=0.745 bias_dec_arcsec=0.589 median_sep_arcsec=1.446 p95_sep_arcsec=2.891 n_q1=487 n_q2=250 n_q3=504 n_q4=384 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4M2bENLQlx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=130, bad_region=0, passed=1857
Got 1857 stars (including 1726 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1857 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1647 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1647 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1647 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1647 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1647 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1647 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 1647 stars left (next iteration limit 1811)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1647 robust_rms=11.595 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.528 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.528 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1647 robust_rms=0.643 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.060 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.060 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1647 robust_rms=0.397 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.587 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.514 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1647 robust_rms_before=1.604 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.352 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.397 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.542 worst_region_rms_after=0.587 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.790 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.514
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.542 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.542 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.352 arcsec matched=1647
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits N_match=1647 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.614 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.351 n_q1=476 n_q2=262 n_q3=515 n_q4=394 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.763
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=1647 N_valid=1647 bias_ra_arcsec=0.745 bias_dec_arcsec=0.586 median_sep_arcsec=1.464 p95_sep_arcsec=2.983 n_q1=476 n_q2=262 n_q3=515 n_q4=394 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits sigma_overall=0.270 worst_q_ratio=1.352
ref2=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.194
new1=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits sigma_overall=0.350 worst_q_ratio=1.800
new2=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits sigma_overall=0.348 worst_q_ratio=1.763
reference average sigma_overall=0.3265 worst_q_ratio=1.273
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348_astrometric_residuals.png (4783 matched stars from wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236_astrometric_residuals.png (4783 matched stars from wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416_astrometric_residuals.png (1625 matched stars from wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417_astrometric_residuals.png (1647 matched stars from wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:06.265 +38:00:05.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Image size: 944.4'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:15.022 +37:58:39.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:49:06.265 +38:00:05.29
Second-epoch image center 09:49:15.022 +37:58:39.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0374 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Image size: 944.3'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:12.735 +37:58:38.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:49:06.265 +38:00:05.29
Second-epoch image center 09:49:12.735 +37:58:38.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0322 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  09:49:15.022 +37:58:39.34
Second-epoch second image center 09:49:12.735 +37:58:38.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00752 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dPy7rC1zQo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.D5uvHcSBcj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J5FlVUKivd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fHjhv9r3Hd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits) and catalog (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 40713 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3381 to 157.6201 deg, Dec +31.9947 to +43.3861 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3381 to 157.6201 deg, Dec 31.9947 to 43.3861 deg
Loaded 5394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3582 out of 3992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 40713 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.802250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.802250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -6.94
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.86

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.86

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 40713 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3381 to 157.6201 deg, Dec +31.9947 to +43.3861 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3381 to 157.6201 deg, Dec 31.9947 to 43.3861 deg
Loaded 5394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3582 out of 3992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 40713 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 40745 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3384 to 157.6207 deg, Dec +31.9963 to +43.3847 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3384 to 157.6207 deg, Dec 31.9963 to 43.3847 deg
Loaded 5394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3546 out of 3992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 40745 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 59 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.0 pix  LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
 2.0 pix  LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
 2.9 pix  fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
 2.9 pix  fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.9 mag.  LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
 15.8 mag.  LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
 13.4 mag.  fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
 13.4 mag.  fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  13.4 (SNR )  12.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.dPy7rC1zQo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1871, bad_region=1, passed=40697
Got 40697 stars (including 38757 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40697 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Excluding outliers - 4786 stars left (next iteration limit 5264)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits N_match=4786 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.217 n_q1=1238 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1263 n_q4=1194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.335
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4786 N_valid=4786 bias_ra_arcsec=0.000 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.219 p95_sep_arcsec=0.646 n_q1=1238 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1263 n_q4=1194 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.D5uvHcSBcj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1991, bad_region=9, passed=40726
Got 40726 stars (including 38641 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40726 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 4786 stars left (next iteration limit 5264)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits N_match=4786 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=1243 n_q2=1093 n_q3=1247 n_q4=1203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4786 N_valid=4786 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.012 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.297 p95_sep_arcsec=0.797 n_q1=1243 n_q2=1093 n_q3=1247 n_q4=1203 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.J5FlVUKivd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=254, bad_region=6, passed=9840
Got 9840 stars (including 9573 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9840 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013117 (47.2 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010493 (37.8 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4767 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4767 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" 
Excluding outliers - 4762 stars left (next iteration limit 5239)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4762 robust_rms=10.964 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.911 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.911 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4762 robust_rms=0.900 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.346 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.135 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4762 robust_rms=0.612 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.901 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.671 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4762 robust_rms_before=1.665 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.547 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.612 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.847 worst_region_rms_after=0.901 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.917 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.671
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.847 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.847 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.547 arcsec matched=4762
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits N_match=4762 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.552 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.795 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=1394 n_q2=710 n_q3=1547 n_q4=1111 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.560
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4762 N_valid=4762 bias_ra_arcsec=0.742 bias_dec_arcsec=0.585 median_sep_arcsec=1.496 p95_sep_arcsec=3.138 n_q1=1394 n_q2=710 n_q3=1547 n_q4=1111 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fHjhv9r3Hd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=281, bad_region=7, passed=10065
Got 10065 stars (including 9760 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10065 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4766 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4757 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4757 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4766 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4756 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4756 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" 
Excluding outliers - 4756 stars left (next iteration limit 5232)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4756 robust_rms=11.091 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.035 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.035 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4756 robust_rms=0.840 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.207 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.202 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4756 robust_rms=0.588 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.839 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.698 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4756 robust_rms_before=1.664 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.543 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.588 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.822 worst_region_rms_after=0.839 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.901 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.698
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.822 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.822 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.543 arcsec matched=4756
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits N_match=4756 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.691 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.515 n_q1=1394 n_q2=702 n_q3=1549 n_q4=1111 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.384
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4756 N_valid=4756 bias_ra_arcsec=0.743 bias_dec_arcsec=0.566 median_sep_arcsec=1.506 p95_sep_arcsec=3.124 n_q1=1394 n_q2=702 n_q3=1549 n_q4=1111 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 09:17:29.01 +42:40:33.5:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 10:24:23.74 +35:23:34.7:  12.12 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 10:21:49.04 +33:50:43.2:  9.51 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 10:23:24.72 +33:33:24.8:  10.50 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 10:21:38.16 +33:32:20.5:  11.25 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 10:24:10.05 +34:30:55.8:  11.40 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 10:21:16.67 +34:45:05.4:  11.79 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 10:23:17.89 +34:28:10.9:  10.98 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 10:26:41.57 +35:09:03.0:  11.57 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 10:24:33.34 +32:57:49.1:  10.04 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:23:24.72 +33:33:24.8:  10.50 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:24:10.05 +34:30:55.8:  11.38 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:24:33.34 +32:57:49.1:  10.03 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:24:23.74 +35:23:34.7:  12.11 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:17:29.01 +42:40:33.5:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:17:29.01 +42:40:33.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  10.50 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:21:49.04 +33:50:43.2:  9.50 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.39 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:21:38.16 +33:32:20.5:  11.25 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:23:17.89 +34:28:10.9:  10.95 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:26:41.57 +35:09:03.0:  11.56 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:21:16.67 +34:45:05.4:  11.80 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:23:24.72 +33:33:24.8: ref_mag=10.50 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0050 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:24:10.05 +34:30:55.8: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3428 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  10.03 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  9.50 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.25 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:24:33.34 +32:57:49.1: ref_mag=10.03 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5962 delta=-0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  10.97 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.56 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:21:49.04 +33:50:43.2: ref_mag=9.50 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1044 delta=-0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:24:23.74 +35:23:34.7: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6651 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:21:38.16 +33:32:20.5: ref_mag=11.25 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6426 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:23:17.89 +34:28:10.9: ref_mag=10.97 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9657 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:26:41.57 +35:09:03.0: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4503 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:21:16.67 +34:45:05.4: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6268 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52684_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52684_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.32699    2461341.82699    11.77    10:24:23.85 +35:23:35.2   9152 1975   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    11.60    10:24:23.63 +35:23:34.3   9157 1975   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52685_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52685_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.32699    2461341.82699    11.64    10:21:38.21 +33:32:21.4   8942 0812   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    11.64    10:21:38.12 +33:32:19.7   8947 0812   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52686_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52686_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.32699    2461341.82699    11.63    10:21:16.67 +34:45:05.2   8811 1541   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    11.63    10:21:16.67 +34:45:05.6   8816 1542   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52688_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52688_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.32699    2461341.82699    11.39    10:26:41.68 +35:09:05.3   9456 1865   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    11.53    10:26:41.45 +35:09:00.6   9461 1864   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52691_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52691_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.32699    2461341.82699    11.23    10:24:10.07 +34:30:58.1   9189 1441   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    11.57    10:24:10.03 +34:30:53.5   9194 1441   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52694_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52694_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.32699    2461341.82699    11.05    10:23:24.68 +33:33:26.4   9165 0849   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    10.97    10:23:24.75 +33:33:23.3   9171 0849   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52695_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52695_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.32699    2461341.82699    10.78    10:24:33.36 +32:57:45.5   9355 0505   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    10.53    10:24:33.31 +32:57:52.6   9360 0506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52696_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52696_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.32699    2461341.82699    10.94    10:23:17.84 +34:28:12.5   9083 1400   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    11.00    10:23:17.95 +34:28:09.4   9089 1401   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52698_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52698_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.32699    2461341.82699    10.26    10:21:49.15 +33:50:45.2   8943 1001   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    10.01    10:21:48.93 +33:50:41.3   8948 1001   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52724_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52724_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.32699    2461341.82699    10.04    09:17:28.99 +42:40:33.6   1162 6088   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-50-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    10.01    09:17:29.02 +42:40:33.5   1166 6088   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52738_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52738_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    10.53    09:13:24.12 +41:00:44.0   0641 5106   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52739_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52739_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    10.46    09:10:09.17 +37:54:10.1   0124 3246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52751_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52751_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    10.23    09:59:07.62 +40:51:20.5   5864 4980   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52755_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52755_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    10.42    09:42:55.88 +39:19:22.7   4035 3987   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52791_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52791_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    11.07    09:18:26.17 +35:59:19.1   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52799_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52799_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    10.90    09:44:33.69 +35:44:51.6   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52811_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52811_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    11.02    09:50:10.16 +35:09:37.5   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52816_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52816_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    11.42    09:34:42.82 +40:18:26.3   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52817_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52817_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    11.34    09:14:42.87 +32:49:46.0   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52820_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52820_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    11.17    09:50:49.99 +33:37:36.6   5070 0580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52864_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52864_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    11.38    09:56:30.53 +35:26:36.6   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52872_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52872_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    11.65    10:01:53.15 +40:11:39.1   6203 4602   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52884_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52884_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    12.03    09:47:22.28 +43:02:41.0   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52907_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52907_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    12.17    09:17:13.80 +36:46:18.3   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52910_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52910_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    12.32    09:18:36.23 +36:47:43.4   1110 2513   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

**** FOUND  09:18:36.26 +36:47:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52923_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52923_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    12.16    09:40:59.58 +40:58:44.8   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52932_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52932_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    11.72    10:19:32.23 +38:37:37.5   8340 3851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52941_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52941_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    12.26    09:24:16.37 +36:36:18.0   1796 2370   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

**** FOUND  09:24:16.37 +36:36:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52947_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52947_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    12.33    09:42:52.15 +40:53:44.7   4015 4935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52952_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52952_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    12.34    09:19:42.65 +35:11:39.1   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52957_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52957_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    12.56    09:10:15.80 +40:24:08.4   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52984_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52984_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    12.58    09:43:12.20 +42:29:08.4   4039 5898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52996_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 52996_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    12.91    09:11:12.49 +39:56:51.6   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53005_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53005_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    12.45    09:17:27.82 +34:17:18.2   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53006_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53006_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    12.67    09:12:05.77 +36:08:28.9   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53010_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53010_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    11.94    09:48:33.68 +32:52:12.3   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53015_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53015_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    12.81    09:40:17.07 +39:50:34.6   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53027_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53027_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    12.70    09:14:22.12 +41:34:39.2   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53039_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53039_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    12.36    10:16:42.35 +40:50:03.3   7869 5142   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53044_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53044_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    12.49    09:24:05.91 +34:23:09.1   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53046_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53046_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    12.49    09:18:56.70 +33:00:02.3   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53047_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53047_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    12.94    09:20:51.81 +37:18:47.4   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53079_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53079_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    13.14    09:11:44.71 +34:58:43.2   0189 1455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53080_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53080_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    12.57    10:02:59.17 +36:04:53.5   6494 2139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53081_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53081_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    13.29    09:27:47.23 +39:42:55.7   2275 4236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53084_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53084_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    13.30    09:10:41.20 +37:59:51.9   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53085_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53085_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    13.15    09:18:40.55 +36:22:25.7   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53086_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53086_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    13.15    09:11:42.21 +38:46:01.3   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53091_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53091_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    13.11    09:15:08.63 +38:00:35.3   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53095_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53095_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    13.32    09:35:19.10 +42:03:11.9   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53096_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53096_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    13.31    09:35:52.10 +33:56:34.8   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53097_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 53097_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    12.89    10:02:51.37 +40:13:45.3   6313 4631   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08320_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 08320_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    6.72    10:07:25.55 +35:14:40.5   7073 1675   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

**** FOUND  10:07:25.52 +35:14:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07720_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 07720_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    11.29    09:53:43.17 +34:55:36.7   5399 1380   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

**** FOUND  09:53:43.20 +34:55:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37306_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 37306_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    12.67    09:09:54.52 +39:34:33.0   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06221_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 06221_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    7.61    09:45:34.38 +34:30:46.2   4400 1096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

**** FOUND  09:45:34.38 +34:30:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02769_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 02769_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    6.60    10:24:08.58 +33:43:05.1   9251 0958   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

**** FOUND  10:24:08.55 +33:43:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03026_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 03026_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    6.46    10:25:54.71 +33:47:40.6   9469 1032   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

**** FOUND  10:25:54.70 +33:47:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33117_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417
The candidate 33117_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 28.32770    2461341.82770    6.72    10:22:19.04 +41:29:52.9   8465 5621   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_025334_TTUQ1b1x1_3056304_e4pUpziF/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-51-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0417.fits

**** FOUND  10:22:19.03 +41:29:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed LMi-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461341.82698924 -observatory V36
15:05:09.34 -19:56:46.0 Mercury (1.3mag)
13:35:01.10 -16:02:05.3 Venus (-4.3mag)
09:17:14.13 +17:22:49.4 Mars (0.9mag)
09:44:10.12 +14:19:46.0 Jupiter (-2.0mag)
00:37:51.29 +01:08:55.7 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:09:57.01 +20:52:30.8 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:08:48.49 -00:35:20.8 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:17.57 -23:42:24.3 Pluto (14.5mag)
04:03:45.33 +25:41:37.4 Moon (-12.0mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 28 02:57 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461341.82698924:
09:44:17.25 +14:19:06.0 Io (6.0mag)
09:44:06.14 +14:20:07.5 Europa (6.1mag)
09:44:08.24 +14:19:57.6 Ganymede (5.5mag)
09:43:45.70 +14:22:02.8 Callisto (6.8mag)
09:45:10.94 +14:33:01.7 Himalia (15.5mag)
09:44:08.03 +14:19:58.3 Thebe (16.4mag)
09:43:35.70 +14:44:18.6 Elara (17.4mag)
09:45:24.79 +13:45:26.7 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
09:41:35.66 +14:50:37.5 Carme (18.7mag)
00:37:37.11 +01:09:00.0 Titan (8.2mag)
00:37:53.70 +01:08:37.9 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:38:08.30 +01:08:16.7 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:37:44.30 +01:09:14.7 Hyperion (14.2mag)
00:36:05.06 +00:56:35.6 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 28 02:57 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461341.82698924:
04:14:56.62 +18:50:31.6 JWST
19:07:47.03 +00:44:21.2 Chandra
06:54:45.20 -01:05:13.5 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 28 02:57 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461341.82698924 -observatory V36
03:37:55.87 +20:04:26.8 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
07:44:26.20 +37:57:40.9 17.9mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill)
07:44:31.34 +37:57:28.1 17.9mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill)
07:43:51.10 +37:57:44.5 17.9mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill)
05:02:49.91 +40:04:16.5 17.8mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski)
18:41:24.07 -33:03:24.3 14.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:44:38.46 -73:30:56.1 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:12:59.08 +35:08:21.6 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:28:16.01 +47:36:34.5 17.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
07:34:56.48 +25:20:53.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:07:43.01 +37:41:21.6 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:33:18.56 +40:57:43.6 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:44:45.66 -13:38:35.2 16.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:49:51.37 +14:38:03.0 15.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
14:08:39.51 -04:06:31.2 16.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
19:51:23.33 +56:52:21.7 15.4mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
13:01:51.38 +16:10:26.6 17.7mag A/2026 E1
16:14:04.17 -60:30:30.2 14.0mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
19:28:17.83 -05:15:35.8 16.8mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS)
23:43:40.36 +15:36:23.4 17.0mag 2P/Encke
23:18:18.71 -27:27:59.9 15.2mag 10P/Tempel
02:32:46.19 +33:33:06.6 16.4mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:22:20.11 -09:32:38.8 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:13:05.70 -09:05:24.1 15.8mag 65P/Gunn
07:55:02.14 +14:12:26.8 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
02:41:23.06 +13:24:07.9 18.0mag 88P/Howell
08:39:23.51 +44:35:49.2 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
09:39:22.67 +07:54:04.5 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
12:15:02.90 +09:24:23.1 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
20:05:40.67 +12:36:37.8 10.0mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:59:04.12 -01:58:56.8 15.7mag 169P/NEAT
03:16:26.60 +02:41:19.3 15.1mag 220P/McNaught
06:20:56.19 +48:40:31.8 15.6mag 260P/McNaught
07:49:51.80 +25:11:56.2 17.6mag 266P/Christensen
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct 28 02:57 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70  TCP J17541876-2736362  2026-10-24.76 9.92
10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00  SN2026sqf  2026-10-24.6 13.27
21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90  ASASSN-26fq  2026-10-23.23 14.82
01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90  ASASSN-26fp  2026-10-23.34 12.9
01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10  ASASSN-26fo  2026-10-19.79 -4.88
00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10  SN2026afqd  2026-10-19.36 -0.77
22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60  ASASSN-26fm  2026-10-13.75 14.42
01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30  SN 2026aedl  2026-10-12.33 15.3
18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00  ASASSN-26fn  2026-10-11.74 15.23
21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30  SN2026acyb  2026-10-9.85 16.83
03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70  SN2026acvp  2026-10-9.95 17.75
04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20  SN2026adhl  2026-10-9.94 17.52
09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40  SN2026aeif  2026-10-9.47 15.93
02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90  ASASSN-26fl  2026-10-7.9 -0.85
02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00  SN 2026adfy  2026-10-4.88 16.61
22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70  AT2026adgn  2026-10-4.28 -2.56
15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40  ASASSN-26fj  2026-10-2.06 15.91
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90  ASASSN-26fi  2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20  ASASSN-26fh  2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90  AT2026adfv  2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50  SN2026abhc  2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80  SN2026acxa  2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40  ASASSN-26fg  2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40  SN2026aajs  2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70  AT2026acgs  2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90  ASASSN-26ff  2026-09-16.38 15.41
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20  SN2026yjv  2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30  SN 2026aafh  2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00  SN 2026aaks  2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20  SN2026aasi  2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80  SN2026aafk  2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60  SN2026aafs  2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50  SN2026aagh   -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10  ASASSN-26fe  2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30  SN2026aars  2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50  SN 2026znh  2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80  ASASSN-26fd  2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70  ASASSN-26fc  2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70  SN 2026zfw  2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10  SN2026aacj  2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10  SN2026zji  2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00  SN2026aaiv  2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60  ASASSN-26fb  2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50  AT2026aabo  2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60  SN 2026zhl  2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70  ASASSN-26fa  2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30  AT2026zwp  2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80  V488  2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10  V8055  2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10  ASASSN-26ez  2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00  AT2026zwo  2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90  AT2026zjy  2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50  SN2026ymb  2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30  SN2026yid  2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60  ASASSN-26ey  2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80  ASASSN-26ex  2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.89 -10:37:05.90  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.05 15.79
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 28 02:57 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3  PNV J00425465+4122593  2026-08-25.4712  18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76  PNV J00425038+4118587  2026-09-04.1512  18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4  PNV J00421276+4116284  2026-09-10.9176  18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7  TCP J17520680-2343207  2026-09-08.7896  12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1  PNV J00424094+4115371  2026-09-17.8925  18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8  TCP J08492013-0919158  2026-09-18.4698  13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6  PNV J00421393+4116356  2026-09-22.6597  19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5  TCP J18140158+1513555  2026-09-24.4645  14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5  TCP J00423661+4113505  2026-09-29.7462  17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8  TCP J22034629-1107578  2026-09-29.7438  14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2  TCP J22050206+2049012  2026-10-03.5715  17.13Cmag
00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2  TCP J00381501+4114472  2026-10-08.5978  17.72Cmag
01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4  TCP J01060583+0951204  2026-10-10.8543  14.54Cmag
17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2  TCP J17541876-2736362  2026-10-12.3993  10.8mag
09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2  PNV J09560079+6906152  2026-10-14.9274  19.38Cmag
00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3  PNV J00433083+4126553  2026-10-17.5651  18.61Cmag
04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6  TCP J04573208+3015416  2026-10-17.7818  18.21Cmag
05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3  TCP J05210764+2338213  2026-10-18.4020  10.3mag
05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5  TCP J05341101+2845305  2026-10-18.3604  16.6mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 28 02:57 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
00:24:47.391 -02:59:42.80  SN 2026aett  2026-10-08.29 20.1822
02:59:10.941 -20:30:34.93  AT 2026aets  2026-10-06.37 19.7659
05:53:12.927 +45:08:05.58  AT 2026aetr  2026-10-04.49 19.6205
06:25:25.402 +52:26:28.41  AT 2026aetq  2026-10-08.47 18.185
01:27:10.008 +12:53:26.88  TDE 2026aetp  2026-10-06.86 20.42
06:50:16.761 +21:22:25.66  AT 2026aeto  2026-10-07.46 19.0121
19:50:47.681 +36:22:07.63  AT 2026aetn  2026-10-05.31 19.441
07:21:33.096 +24:38:24.50  AT 2026aetl  2026-10-07.22 19.8
08:30:03.915 +01:34:45.41  AT 2026aetk  2026-10-05.52 19.5934
10:32:09.821 +11:37:46.17  AT 2026aetj  2026-10-01.53 18.5059
16:11:43.883 +20:59:33.48  AT 2026aeti  2026-10-03.14 19.2268
19:55:55.462 +58:10:08.22  AT 2026aeth  2026-10-02.16 20.7283
14:55:19.146 +37:33:21.65  AT 2026aetg  2026-10-02.14 17.2445
14:51:59.504 +47:04:29.76  AT 2026aetf  2026-10-02.14 19.1738
06:50:36.388 +58:36:08.80  SN 2026aete  2026-10-07.53 19.306
09:20:29.340 +55:06:35.79  SN 2026aetd  2026-10-07.54 17.677
08:26:28.724 +38:08:57.54  AT 2026aetc  2026-10-02.47 19.3657
06:41:51.189 +21:53:58.11  SN 2026aetb  2026-10-07.46 19.5374
08:34:43.981 +46:14:33.95  AT 2026aeta  2026-10-02.51 19.5454
09:00:29.362 -03:20:55.67  AT 2026aesz  2026-10-03.53 19.6849
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 28 02:57 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Wed Oct 28 02:55:26 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 2s (0.03 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 25s (0.42 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 6s (0.10 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 36s (0.60 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 4 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 8s (0.13 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 0s (0.00 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 9s (0.15 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 2s (0.03 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 22s (0.37 min)
FIELD_LMi-01-Q1b1x1: 73s (1.22 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 185s (3.08 min)
Finished: Wed Oct 28 02:58:31 CDT 2026