######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=esa_tap (lib/gaia_dr2_cone_search.sh -> ESA Gaia Archive TAP service)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-09-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-09-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 208857 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 208857 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits_preview.png'
UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits

renamed 'UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits_preview.png'
UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 449.0147
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 524.3424
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4652.2178
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 963.9290
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4637.9013
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 967.4379
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 10.3609
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.004
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 15.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-28T02:39:56.2856918' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-28T07:39:56.2856918' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61341.3194014467 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-28T07:40:06.1899247' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61341.3195160762 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 143.99734254325 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 45.9999633149627 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 20.5994444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 47.8425 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.82257251040071 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 92.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 15.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 31.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.200896 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits :)
Spent 0.523479 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 15.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-28T02:40:44.5214924' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-28T07:40:44.5214924' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61341.3199597336 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-28T07:40:54.4228760' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61341.3200743287 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 143.997342436191 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 45.9999633565135 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 20.7230555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 47.9116666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.80673103102088 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29513 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 92.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 15.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 31.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.200896 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits :)
Spent 0.530189 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits

fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461341.81951719
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:00.615 +46:00:07.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:35:52.761 +45:58:36.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.615 +46:00:07.35
Second-epoch image center 09:35:52.761 +45:58:36.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0340 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:35:54.898 +45:59:06.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.615 +46:00:07.35
Second-epoch image center 09:35:54.898 +45:59:06.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0237 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:35:52.761 +45:58:36.42
Second-epoch second image center 09:35:54.898 +45:59:06.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01032 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5f0OXAtz61
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NxJlx9nXst
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UzcU4sVMJy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RtzWQqeBdN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3113 to 155.8121 deg, Dec +39.8601 to +51.4110 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3113 to 155.8121 deg, Dec 39.8601 to 51.4110 deg
Loaded 5371 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3775 out of 3982 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3982 out of 8167 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.906500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.906500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3113 to 155.8121 deg, Dec +39.8601 to +51.4110 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3113 to 155.8121 deg, Dec 39.8601 to 51.4110 deg
Loaded 5371 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3775 out of 3982 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3982 out of 8167 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 8217 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3113 to 155.8120 deg, Dec +39.8857 to +51.4193 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3113 to 155.8120 deg, Dec 39.8857 to 51.4193 deg
Loaded 5368 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3781 out of 3990 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3990 out of 8217 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
2.1 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
2.8 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
2.9 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
15.7 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
13.4 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
13.4 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.5f0OXAtz61 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=568, bad_region=0, passed=8167
Got 8167 stars (including 7592 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=1234 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1311 n_q4=1168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.333
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4912 N_valid=4912 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.252 p95_sep_arcsec=0.752 n_q1=1234 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1311 n_q4=1168 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NxJlx9nXst (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=561, bad_region=0, passed=8217
Got 8217 stars (including 7647 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8217 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8217 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8217 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8217 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1221 n_q2=1194 n_q3=1319 n_q4=1177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.286
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4911 N_valid=4911 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.243 p95_sep_arcsec=0.707 n_q1=1221 n_q2=1194 n_q3=1319 n_q4=1177 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.UzcU4sVMJy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=162, bad_region=0, passed=2374
Got 2374 stars (including 2209 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2164 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2162 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2162 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2163 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2161 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2161 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 2161 stars left (next iteration limit 2378)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2161 robust_rms=12.787 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.352 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.352 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2161 robust_rms=0.497 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.854 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.854 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2161 robust_rms=0.340 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.420 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.420 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2161 robust_rms_before=1.171 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.301 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.340 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.417 worst_region_rms_after=0.420 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.405 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.420
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.417 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.417 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.301 arcsec matched=2161
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits N_match=2161 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=538 n_q2=432 n_q3=632 n_q4=559 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.195
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2161 N_valid=2161 bias_ra_arcsec=0.513 bias_dec_arcsec=0.736 median_sep_arcsec=1.116 p95_sep_arcsec=1.982 n_q1=538 n_q2=432 n_q3=632 n_q4=559 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.RtzWQqeBdN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=160, bad_region=0, passed=2377
Got 2377 stars (including 2214 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2377 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2169 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2167 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2165 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2167 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2375 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2169 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2167 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2375 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2167 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2375 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 2167 stars left (next iteration limit 2383)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2167 robust_rms=12.733 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.751 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.751 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2167 robust_rms=0.489 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.698 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.698 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2167 robust_rms=0.366 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.457 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.442 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2167 robust_rms_before=1.138 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.316 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.366 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.445 worst_region_rms_after=0.457 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.360 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.442
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.445 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.445 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.316 arcsec matched=2167
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits N_match=2167 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=533 n_q2=439 n_q3=632 n_q4=563 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.214
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2167 N_valid=2167 bias_ra_arcsec=0.541 bias_dec_arcsec=0.702 median_sep_arcsec=1.076 p95_sep_arcsec=1.891 n_q1=533 n_q2=439 n_q3=632 n_q4=563 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits sigma_overall=0.319 worst_q_ratio=1.333
ref2=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits sigma_overall=0.300 worst_q_ratio=1.286
new1=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits sigma_overall=0.306 worst_q_ratio=1.195
new2=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits sigma_overall=0.323 worst_q_ratio=1.214
reference average sigma_overall=0.3095 worst_q_ratio=1.3095
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332_astrometric_residuals.png (4912 matched stars from wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333_astrometric_residuals.png (4911 matched stars from wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404_astrometric_residuals.png (2161 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405_astrometric_residuals.png (2167 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20494_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 20494_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.32008 | 2461341.82008 | 10.64 | 09:08:47.95 +42:09:20.6 | 1819 0913 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits |
**** FOUND 09:08:47.95 +42:09:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:00.615 +46:00:07.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:35:52.761 +45:58:36.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.615 +46:00:07.35
Second-epoch image center 09:35:52.761 +45:58:36.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0340 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:35:54.898 +45:59:06.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.615 +46:00:07.35
Second-epoch image center 09:35:54.898 +45:59:06.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0237 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:35:52.761 +45:58:36.42
Second-epoch second image center 09:35:54.898 +45:59:06.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01032 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5CbHSvluTG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CFyKvTl0aC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aRW6a6t7Ii
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MhibOYuL73
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.1869 to 155.9247 deg, Dec +39.8064 to +51.4126 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.1869 to 155.9247 deg, Dec 39.8064 to 51.4126 deg
Loaded 5468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3552 out of 3993 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3993 out of 43830 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.804300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.804300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.94
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.86
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.86
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.1869 to 155.9247 deg, Dec +39.8064 to +51.4126 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.1869 to 155.9247 deg, Dec 39.8064 to 51.4126 deg
Loaded 5468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3552 out of 3993 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3993 out of 43830 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 43644 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.2439 to 155.9246 deg, Dec +39.8187 to +51.4195 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.2439 to 155.9246 deg, Dec 39.8187 to 51.4195 deg
Loaded 5438 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3552 out of 3999 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3999 out of 43644 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
2.0 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
2.7 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
2.7 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
15.9 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
13.7 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
13.8 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5CbHSvluTG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=2151, bad_region=1, passed=43808
Got 43808 stars (including 41579 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43808 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1219 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1313 n_q4=1180 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.328
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4911 N_valid=4911 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.011 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.247 p95_sep_arcsec=0.736 n_q1=1219 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1313 n_q4=1180 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CFyKvTl0aC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2132, bad_region=2, passed=43630
Got 43630 stars (including 41413 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43630 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43630 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43630 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43630 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.243 n_q1=1212 n_q2=1198 n_q3=1311 n_q4=1190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4911 N_valid=4911 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.008 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.008 median_sep_arcsec=0.236 p95_sep_arcsec=0.709 n_q1=1212 n_q2=1198 n_q3=1311 n_q4=1190 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.aRW6a6t7Ii (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=286, bad_region=7, passed=12664
Got 12664 stars (including 12355 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12664 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=12.265 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.593 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.593 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.615 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.891 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.891 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.454 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.565 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.565 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4893 robust_rms_before=1.200 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.414 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.454 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.546 worst_region_rms_after=0.565 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.452 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.565
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.546 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.546 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.414 arcsec matched=4893
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.405 n_q1=1247 n_q2=939 n_q3=1565 n_q4=1142 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4893 N_valid=4893 bias_ra_arcsec=0.510 bias_dec_arcsec=0.748 median_sep_arcsec=1.130 p95_sep_arcsec=2.053 n_q1=1247 n_q2=939 n_q3=1565 n_q4=1142 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.MhibOYuL73 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=275, bad_region=8, passed=12679
Got 12679 stars (including 12383 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12679 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=12.087 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.836 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.836 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.594 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.818 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.818 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.463 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.573 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.561 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4893 robust_rms_before=1.172 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.417 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.463 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.526 worst_region_rms_after=0.573 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.413 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.561
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.526 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.526 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.417 arcsec matched=4893
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=1257 n_q2=945 n_q3=1559 n_q4=1132 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.209
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4893 N_valid=4893 bias_ra_arcsec=0.534 bias_dec_arcsec=0.715 median_sep_arcsec=1.094 p95_sep_arcsec=2.008 n_q1=1257 n_q2=945 n_q3=1559 n_q4=1132 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:16:19.20 +48:57:30.5: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:03:08.58 +49:56:28.4: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:01:18.96 +43:53:32.9: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:03:08.58 +49:56:28.4: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:01:18.96 +43:53:32.9: 13.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:16:19.20 +48:57:30.5: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:03:08.58 +49:56:28.4: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8032 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:01:18.96 +43:53:32.9: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9824 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:16:19.20 +48:57:30.5: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7822 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52855_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52855_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.31952 | 2461341.81952 | 12.99 | 09:01:18.89 +43:53:32.3 | 1062 2021 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.32008 | 2461341.82008 | 12.97 | 09:01:19.03 +43:53:33.5 | 1059 2016 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53131_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53131_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.32008 | 2461341.82008 | 12.43 | 09:08:59.08 +49:18:54.8 | 2079 5240 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits |
**** FOUND 09:08:59.05 +49:18:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53190_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53190_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.32008 | 2461341.82008 | 12.40 | 09:29:07.19 +50:00:38.3 | 4059 5609 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits |
**** FOUND 09:29:07.17 +50:00:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53209_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53209_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.31952 | 2461341.81952 | 12.80 | 09:03:08.52 +49:56:29.6 | 1531 5665 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.32008 | 2461341.82008 | 12.81 | 09:03:08.64 +49:56:27.3 | 1527 5660 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53316_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53316_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.31952 | 2461341.81952 | 12.96 | 09:16:19.12 +48:57:29.9 | 2800 4994 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-39-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.32008 | 2461341.82008 | 12.69 | 09:16:19.28 +48:57:31.1 | 2797 4990 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53322_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53322_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.32008 | 2461341.82008 | 13.31 | 09:05:24.29 +48:33:40.8 | 1695 4807 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits |
**** FOUND 09:05:24.42 +48:33:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53400_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53400_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.32008 | 2461341.82008 | 13.45 | 08:56:24.41 +45:45:49.1 | 0627 3192 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits |
**** FOUND 08:56:24.33 +45:45:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07521_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 07521_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 28.32008 | 2461341.82008 | 6.57 | 10:17:05.19 +42:54:47.2 | 9392 1764 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits |
**** FOUND 10:17:05.18 +42:54:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07744_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 07744_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 28.32008 | 2461341.82008 | 10.71 | 09:08:47.97 +42:09:20.5 | 1819 0913 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits |
**** FOUND 09:08:47.97 +42:09:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21283_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 21283_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 28.32008 | 2461341.82008 | 13.10 | 09:03:53.23 +45:14:39.5 | 1400 2814 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00205_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 00205_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 28.32008 | 2461341.82008 | 6.64 | 09:57:40.52 +41:03:18.4 | 7352 0373 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_024134_TTUQ1b1x1_2738094_93ZJQCvz/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-40-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits |
**** FOUND 09:57:40.53 +41:03:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461341.81951719 -observatory V36
15:05:10.28 -19:56:55.3 Mercury (1.3mag)
13:35:01.88 -16:02:16.3 Venus (-4.3mag)
09:17:13.20 +17:22:53.0 Mars (0.9mag)
09:44:09.89 +14:19:47.1 Jupiter (-2.0mag)
00:37:51.40 +01:08:56.4 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:09:57.07 +20:52:30.9 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:08:48.52 -00:35:20.5 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:17.56 -23:42:24.4 Pluto (14.5mag)
04:03:26.67 +25:40:10.3 Moon (-12.0mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 28 02:46 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461341.81951719:
09:44:17.03 +14:19:07.0 Io (6.0mag)
09:44:05.78 +14:20:09.3 Europa (6.1mag)
09:44:08.12 +14:19:58.0 Ganymede (5.5mag)
09:43:45.42 +14:22:04.1 Callisto (6.8mag)
09:45:10.68 +14:33:03.0 Himalia (15.5mag)
09:44:07.63 +14:20:00.2 Thebe (16.4mag)
09:43:35.45 +14:44:19.6 Elara (17.4mag)
09:45:24.60 +13:45:27.6 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
09:41:35.46 +14:50:38.4 Carme (18.7mag)
00:37:37.22 +01:09:00.7 Titan (8.2mag)
00:37:53.77 +01:08:38.5 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:38:08.39 +01:08:17.3 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:37:44.45 +01:09:15.4 Hyperion (14.2mag)
00:36:05.17 +00:56:36.2 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 28 02:46 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461341.81951719:
04:14:57.14 +18:50:34.9 JWST
19:05:51.52 +01:29:15.2 Chandra
06:53:07.29 +00:04:18.5 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 28 02:46 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461341.81951719 -observatory V36
03:37:56.18 +20:04:27.2 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
07:44:26.02 +37:57:39.1 17.9mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill)
07:44:31.16 +37:57:26.3 17.9mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill)
07:43:50.92 +37:57:42.6 17.9mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill)
05:02:49.94 +40:04:20.3 17.8mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski)
18:41:23.59 -33:03:25.1 14.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:44:38.39 -73:30:54.3 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:12:59.18 +35:08:20.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:28:17.02 +47:36:37.7 17.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
07:34:56.40 +25:20:53.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:07:42.92 +37:41:18.0 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:33:18.31 +40:57:44.2 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:44:45.76 -13:38:35.4 16.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:49:50.46 +14:38:05.1 15.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
14:08:39.02 -04:06:29.0 16.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
19:51:21.57 +56:52:37.8 15.4mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
13:01:50.95 +16:10:23.1 17.7mag A/2026 E1
16:14:04.98 -60:30:02.7 14.0mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
19:28:17.42 -05:15:35.2 16.8mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS)
23:43:41.50 +15:36:30.1 17.0mag 2P/Encke
23:18:18.16 -27:28:07.4 15.2mag 10P/Tempel
02:32:45.71 +33:33:18.7 16.4mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:22:19.82 -09:32:36.7 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:13:05.90 -09:05:24.3 15.8mag 65P/Gunn
07:55:01.73 +14:12:29.6 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
02:41:23.59 +13:24:09.5 18.0mag 88P/Howell
08:39:21.97 +44:35:42.7 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
09:39:21.77 +07:54:14.6 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
12:15:02.01 +09:24:29.1 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
20:05:42.12 +12:36:28.8 10.0mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:59:03.11 -01:58:51.6 15.7mag 169P/NEAT
03:16:27.04 +02:41:21.8 15.1mag 220P/McNaught
06:20:55.99 +48:40:26.6 15.6mag 260P/McNaught
07:49:51.29 +25:11:56.7 17.6mag 266P/Christensen
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct 28 02:46 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92
10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27
21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82
01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9
01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88
00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77
22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42
01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3
18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23
21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83
03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75
04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52
09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93
02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85
02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61
22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56
15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.89 -10:37:05.90 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.05 15.79
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 28 02:46 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag
00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag
01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag
17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag
09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag
00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag
04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag
05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag
05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 28 02:46 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
00:24:47.391 -02:59:42.80 SN 2026aett 2026-10-08.29 20.1822
02:59:10.941 -20:30:34.93 AT 2026aets 2026-10-06.37 19.7659
05:53:12.927 +45:08:05.58 AT 2026aetr 2026-10-04.49 19.6205
06:25:25.402 +52:26:28.41 AT 2026aetq 2026-10-08.47 18.185
01:27:10.008 +12:53:26.88 TDE 2026aetp 2026-10-06.86 20.42
06:50:16.761 +21:22:25.66 AT 2026aeto 2026-10-07.46 19.0121
19:50:47.681 +36:22:07.63 AT 2026aetn 2026-10-05.31 19.441
07:21:33.096 +24:38:24.50 AT 2026aetl 2026-10-07.22 19.8
08:30:03.915 +01:34:45.41 AT 2026aetk 2026-10-05.52 19.5934
10:32:09.821 +11:37:46.17 AT 2026aetj 2026-10-01.53 18.5059
16:11:43.883 +20:59:33.48 AT 2026aeti 2026-10-03.14 19.2268
19:55:55.462 +58:10:08.22 AT 2026aeth 2026-10-02.16 20.7283
14:55:19.146 +37:33:21.65 AT 2026aetg 2026-10-02.14 17.2445
14:51:59.504 +47:04:29.76 AT 2026aetf 2026-10-02.14 19.1738
06:50:36.388 +58:36:08.80 SN 2026aete 2026-10-07.53 19.306
09:20:29.340 +55:06:35.79 SN 2026aetd 2026-10-07.54 17.677
08:26:28.724 +38:08:57.54 AT 2026aetc 2026-10-02.47 19.3657
06:41:51.189 +21:53:58.11 SN 2026aetb 2026-10-07.46 19.5374
08:34:43.981 +46:14:33.95 AT 2026aeta 2026-10-02.51 19.5454
09:00:29.362 -03:20:55.67 AT 2026aesz 2026-10-03.53 19.6849
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 28 02:46 tns_transients_list.txt