NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-02-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits
Field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=esa_tap (lib/gaia_dr2_cone_search.sh -> ESA Gaia Archive TAP service)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-02-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-02-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 222779 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 222779 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits_preview.png'
UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits

renamed 'UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits_preview.png'
UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 521.0909 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 558.9001 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4020.5052 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 884.5533 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4002.6747 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 879.9233 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 7.71555 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.005 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 15.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-28T02:17:22.0920639' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-28T07:17:22.0920639' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61341.3037279164 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-28T07:17:31.9934341' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61341.3038425115 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 128.574207558869 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 61.9995125988919 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 31.6069444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 33.4291666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.90326164930669 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 34 17' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29533 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29533 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 91.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.18 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 15.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 53.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 25.602048 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 16.901352 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits :) Spent 0.532694 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 15.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-28T02:18:16.1232527' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-28T07:18:16.1232527' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61341.3043532753 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-28T07:18:26.0267609' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61341.3044678937 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 128.574207381043 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 61.9995126315565 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 31.7102777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 33.4577777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.89774201042196 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 34 17' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29533 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29533 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 91.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.18 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 15.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 53.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 25.602048 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 16.901352 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits :) Spent 0.525731 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits


fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461341.80384366 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:34:19.248 +61:59:50.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81 Second-epoch image center 08:34:19.248 +61:59:50.86 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0035 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:34:22.337 +62:00:04.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81 Second-epoch image center 08:34:22.337 +62:00:04.41 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0101 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 08:34:19.248 +61:59:50.86 Second-epoch second image center 08:34:22.337 +62:00:04.41 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00712 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UURZbyETjJ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GD0fQCxzp2 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LQBUbIxUqs Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kcmMTFSehr Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 9619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5418 deg, Dec +55.4555 to +67.4100 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5418 deg, Dec 55.4555 to 67.4100 deg Loaded 8849 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5401 out of 5701 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5701 out of 9619 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.868000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.868000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 9619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5418 deg, Dec +55.4555 to +67.4100 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5418 deg, Dec 55.4555 to 67.4100 deg Loaded 8849 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5401 out of 5701 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5701 out of 9619 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 9596 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5413 deg, Dec +55.4555 to +67.4099 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5413 deg, Dec 55.4555 to 67.4099 deg Loaded 8848 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5383 out of 5696 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5696 out of 9596 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits (aperture=6.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 2.2 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 15.6 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 14.1 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits 14.1 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.UURZbyETjJ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=686, bad_region=0, passed=9619 Got 9619 stars (including 8917 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9619 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9619 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9619 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9619 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1045 n_q2=1423 n_q3=1046 n_q4=1382 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.433 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4896 N_valid=4896 bias_ra_arcsec=0.000 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.291 p95_sep_arcsec=0.895 n_q1=1045 n_q2=1423 n_q3=1046 n_q4=1382 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.GD0fQCxzp2 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=696, bad_region=0, passed=9596 Got 9596 stars (including 8884 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9596 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9596 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9596 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9596 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1037 n_q2=1434 n_q3=1042 n_q4=1388 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.387 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4901 N_valid=4901 bias_ra_arcsec=0.008 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.290 p95_sep_arcsec=0.879 n_q1=1037 n_q2=1434 n_q3=1042 n_q4=1388 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.LQBUbIxUqs (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=299, bad_region=1, passed=3657 Got 3657 stars (including 3351 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3657 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3273 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3271 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3271 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3271 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3657 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3274 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3273 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3657 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3273 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3657 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 3273 stars left (next iteration limit 3598) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3273 robust_rms=12.838 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.011 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.011 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3273 robust_rms=0.449 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.793 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.793 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3273 robust_rms=0.292 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.336 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.336 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3273 robust_rms_before=1.043 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.282 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.292 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.335 worst_region_rms_after=0.336 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.069 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.336 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.335 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.335 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.282 arcsec matched=3273 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits N_match=3273 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=874 n_q2=638 n_q3=989 n_q4=772 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.066 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3273 N_valid=3273 bias_ra_arcsec=0.236 bias_dec_arcsec=0.759 median_sep_arcsec=0.951 p95_sep_arcsec=1.806 n_q1=874 n_q2=638 n_q3=989 n_q4=772 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.kcmMTFSehr (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=297, bad_region=0, passed=3686 Got 3686 stars (including 3384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3686 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3309 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3307 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3307 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3307 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3686 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3311 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3309 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3686 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3309 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3686 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 3309 stars left (next iteration limit 3637) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3309 robust_rms=12.872 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.687 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.687 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3309 robust_rms=0.466 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.742 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.742 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3309 robust_rms=0.291 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.341 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.341 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3309 robust_rms_before=1.050 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.274 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.291 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.324 worst_region_rms_after=0.341 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.101 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.341 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.324 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.324 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.274 arcsec matched=3309 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits N_match=3309 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=887 n_q2=633 n_q3=1011 n_q4=778 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3309 N_valid=3309 bias_ra_arcsec=0.260 bias_dec_arcsec=0.757 median_sep_arcsec=0.965 p95_sep_arcsec=1.790 n_q1=887 n_q2=633 n_q3=1011 n_q4=778 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.433 ref2=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits sigma_overall=0.365 worst_q_ratio=1.387 new1=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.066 new2=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits sigma_overall=0.286 worst_q_ratio=1.097 reference average sigma_overall=0.359 worst_q_ratio=1.41 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303_astrometric_residuals.png (4901 matched stars from wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382_astrometric_residuals.png (3273 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383_astrometric_residuals.png (3309 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20601_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 20601_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    10.81    08:30:26.70 +60:41:07.7   4521 2398   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits **** FOUND 08:30:26.69 +60:41:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20636_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 20636_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    11.29    07:54:26.86 +65:18:53.9   2223 5326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits **** FOUND 07:54:26.94 +65:18:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:34:19.248 +61:59:50.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81 Second-epoch image center 08:34:19.248 +61:59:50.86 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0035 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:34:22.337 +62:00:04.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81 Second-epoch image center 08:34:22.337 +62:00:04.41 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0101 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 08:34:19.248 +61:59:50.86 Second-epoch second image center 08:34:22.337 +62:00:04.41 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00712 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q6FCCF56zV Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pgTgvsEuCv Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yk4buHPlpW Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uKni8lR5C8 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 56661 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5794 deg, Dec +55.3287 to +67.4112 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5794 deg, Dec 55.3287 to 67.4112 deg Loaded 8955 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5034 out of 5776 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5776 out of 56661 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.754100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.754100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.02 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.73 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.73
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 56661 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5794 deg, Dec +55.3287 to +67.4112 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5794 deg, Dec 55.3287 to 67.4112 deg Loaded 8955 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5034 out of 5776 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5776 out of 56661 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 56645 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5789 deg, Dec +55.3459 to +67.4186 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5789 deg, Dec 55.3459 to 67.4186 deg Loaded 8948 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5045 out of 5770 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5770 out of 56645 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits (aperture=4.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 68 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 2.0 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 15.7 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 14.3 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits 14.3 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.Q6FCCF56zV (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=2986, bad_region=5, passed=56640 Got 56640 stars (including 53549 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56640 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56640 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56640 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56640 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5381) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.281 n_q1=1040 n_q2=1417 n_q3=1035 n_q4=1400 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.408 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4892 N_valid=4892 bias_ra_arcsec=0.009 bias_dec_arcsec=0.007 median_sep_arcsec=0.282 p95_sep_arcsec=0.867 n_q1=1040 n_q2=1417 n_q3=1035 n_q4=1400 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.pgTgvsEuCv (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=2922, bad_region=5, passed=56624 Got 56624 stars (including 53603 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56624 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56624 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56624 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56624 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1040 n_q2=1423 n_q3=1040 n_q4=1391 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.345 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4894 N_valid=4894 bias_ra_arcsec=0.016 bias_dec_arcsec=0.006 median_sep_arcsec=0.285 p95_sep_arcsec=0.853 n_q1=1040 n_q2=1423 n_q3=1040 n_q4=1391 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.yk4buHPlpW (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=624, bad_region=13, passed=23323 Got 23323 stars (including 22648 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23323 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23323 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23323 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23323 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5372) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=12.353 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.444 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.444 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.488 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.759 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.759 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.311 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.364 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.364 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4886 robust_rms_before=1.037 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.300 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.311 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.372 worst_region_rms_after=0.364 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.101 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.364 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.372 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.372 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.300 arcsec matched=4886 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=1312 n_q2=946 n_q3=1530 n_q4=1098 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.031 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4886 N_valid=4886 bias_ra_arcsec=0.241 bias_dec_arcsec=0.750 median_sep_arcsec=0.950 p95_sep_arcsec=1.784 n_q1=1312 n_q2=946 n_q3=1530 n_q4=1098 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.uKni8lR5C8 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=609, bad_region=14, passed=23321 Got 23321 stars (including 22656 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23321 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23321 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23321 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23321 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=12.341 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.984 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.984 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.486 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.764 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.764 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.314 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.370 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.370 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4884 robust_rms_before=1.038 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.294 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.314 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.373 worst_region_rms_after=0.370 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.100 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.370 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.373 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.373 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.294 arcsec matched=4884 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1311 n_q2=942 n_q3=1530 n_q4=1101 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.054 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4884 N_valid=4884 bias_ra_arcsec=0.267 bias_dec_arcsec=0.745 median_sep_arcsec=0.951 p95_sep_arcsec=1.776 n_q1=1311 n_q2=942 n_q3=1530 n_q4=1101 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:37:12.89 +61:49:44.7: 11.07 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 08:09:30.53 +65:41:20.7: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:53:35.36 +58:12:40.6: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 07:37:12.89 +61:49:44.7: 11.05 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.06 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:37:12.89 +61:49:44.7: ref_mag=11.06 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2997 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:28:45.12 +63:53:54.3: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 08:56:07.57 +60:19:05.5: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 08:09:30.53 +65:41:20.7: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:09:30.53 +65:41:20.7: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8438 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 07:53:35.36 +58:12:40.6: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 07:28:45.12 +63:53:54.3: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:53:35.36 +58:12:40.6: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9480 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:45.12 +63:53:54.3: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2018 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 09:12:39.97 +61:41:51.0: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 08:56:07.57 +60:19:05.5: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:56:07.57 +60:19:05.5: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1018 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 09:12:39.97 +61:41:51.0: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:12:39.97 +61:41:51.0: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4519 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70714_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 70714_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    12.54    08:05:58.21 +58:12:50.2   2592 0970   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits **** FOUND 08:05:58.17 +58:12:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70715_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 70715_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 28.30384    2461341.80384    11.22    07:37:13.00 +61:49:44.3   0735 3432   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    11.41    07:37:12.77 +61:49:45.1   0731 3431   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70768_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 70768_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    10.75    08:51:54.45 +64:51:01.8   5864 4980   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70773_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 70773_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    10.82    08:23:30.87 +63:19:27.2   4035 3987   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70824_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 70824_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    11.29    07:44:57.53 +59:38:40.0   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70852_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 70852_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    11.42    09:17:02.45 +58:33:32.5   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70856_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 70856_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    11.53    08:35:58.17 +59:11:11.2   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70872_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 70872_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    11.87    08:08:50.90 +64:13:58.1   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70875_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 70875_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    11.84    09:10:57.37 +63:32:53.3   7208 4368   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits **** FOUND 09:10:57.38 +63:32:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70891_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 70891_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    11.80    08:36:59.66 +57:39:14.6   5070 0580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70895_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 70895_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    11.71    07:58:52.98 +58:11:05.5   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70903_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 70903_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    11.93    08:46:07.06 +59:27:29.4   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70951_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 70951_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    12.29    08:56:30.47 +64:10:07.7   6203 4602   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70977_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 70977_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    12.10    09:26:45.17 +57:20:10.4   9118 0903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71018_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71018_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    12.63    08:19:36.69 +64:57:56.7   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71022_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71022_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    12.69    07:26:28.71 +63:48:02.6   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71024_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71024_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    12.45    09:02:51.55 +57:53:31.0   7134 0898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71026_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71026_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    12.49    07:47:38.59 +58:52:58.2   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71048_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71048_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    12.75    07:44:52.79 +57:55:57.0   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71066_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71066_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    12.81    08:34:47.25 +65:07:01.9   4766 5073   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits **** FOUND 08:34:47.24 +65:07:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71071_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71071_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    12.51    08:33:29.53 +56:53:45.1   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71073_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71073_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 28.30384    2461341.80384    12.88    08:09:30.37 +65:41:20.2   3190 5456   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    12.82    08:09:30.68 +65:41:21.1   3187 5454   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71075_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71075_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    12.93    08:35:12.82 +66:16:44.7   4772 5776   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits **** FOUND 08:35:12.77 +66:16:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71082_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71082_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    12.68    08:39:05.02 +59:57:55.7   5176 1983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits **** FOUND 08:39:05.03 +59:57:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71100_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71100_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    12.81    08:09:48.00 +65:39:11.0   3203 5431   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits **** FOUND 08:09:48.06 +65:39:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71105_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71105_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.06    08:22:58.75 +64:53:43.4   4015 4935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71108_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71108_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    12.92    07:28:43.32 +63:22:48.5   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71125_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71125_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.01    07:27:02.97 +62:58:26.3   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71132_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71132_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    12.60    08:42:19.39 +57:04:26.2   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71138_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71138_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    12.89    07:55:05.97 +58:09:57.2   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71142_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71142_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.00    08:18:46.63 +63:49:32.2   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71179_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71179_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.07    07:34:45.34 +59:38:15.7   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71186_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71186_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    12.96    09:23:29.21 +57:43:55.7   8801 1083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71208_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71208_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 28.30384    2461341.80384    13.05    07:53:35.31 +58:12:40.6   1610 1070   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    12.88    07:53:35.41 +58:12:40.5   1606 1068   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71214_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71214_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    12.96    09:35:02.56 +61:27:40.4   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71215_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71215_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 28.30384    2461341.80384    13.25    07:28:44.94 +63:53:53.5   0417 4786   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.17    07:28:45.30 +63:53:55.2   0414 4785   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71226_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71226_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.13    07:31:52.75 +65:04:56.2   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71263_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71263_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 28.30384    2461341.80384    13.16    08:56:07.44 +60:19:04.5   6437 2295   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.06    08:56:07.70 +60:19:06.4   6433 2293   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71264_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71264_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.17    09:11:18.28 +61:46:18.7   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71273_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71273_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.41    08:34:39.53 +61:17:30.3   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71279_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71279_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.29    09:22:55.27 +64:35:32.3   7869 5142   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71284_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71284_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.05    07:37:39.34 +61:34:15.9   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71285_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71285_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.17    09:30:24.67 +59:22:04.8   9112 2176   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71288_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71288_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.29    08:15:47.67 +60:21:14.6   3433 2216   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits **** FOUND 08:15:47.68 +60:21:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71292_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71292_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.21    07:58:29.78 +56:59:45.1   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71294_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71294_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.55    08:56:42.07 +60:03:15.9   6494 2139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71302_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71302_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.09    08:13:39.37 +57:53:35.4   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71319_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71319_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.32    07:45:00.01 +60:01:56.8   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71346_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71346_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.32    07:41:59.46 +58:28:43.4   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71349_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71349_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.24    07:35:23.58 +58:28:31.8   0189 1455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71359_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71359_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 28.30384    2461341.80384    13.45    09:12:39.98 +61:41:51.4   7519 3289   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.46    09:12:39.97 +61:41:50.7   7515 3286   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71360_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71360_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.39    07:31:06.01 +62:13:38.0   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71370_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71370_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.33    08:42:52.64 +65:54:04.1   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71383_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71383_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.70    07:57:15.02 +63:32:24.1   2275 4236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71387_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71387_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.61    09:21:02.20 +62:23:04.7   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71392_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71392_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.38    09:08:00.20 +58:52:36.8   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71393_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71393_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.54    08:38:42.76 +59:34:58.4   5158 1751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71400_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71400_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.62    07:44:08.84 +58:25:59.8   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71421_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71421_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.90    08:27:45.73 +62:23:27.6   4322 3423   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits **** FOUND 08:27:45.76 +62:23:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71430_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71430_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.61    08:44:20.34 +59:21:37.8   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71452_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71452_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.74    08:44:14.29 +57:06:05.3   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71455_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71455_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.83    07:30:23.01 +61:26:13.3   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71463_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71463_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.90    08:19:46.43 +59:31:03.8   3714 1701   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71464_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71464_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.58    09:08:04.74 +59:15:52.6   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 71469_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 71469_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    13.99    08:51:57.16 +64:38:07.9   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 10578_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 10578_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    11.58    07:54:27.01 +65:18:53.1   2223 5325   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits **** FOUND 07:54:27.05 +65:18:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 47513_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 47513_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    12.37    08:27:33.17 +58:48:44.6   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 13549_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 The candidate 13549_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 28.30447    2461341.80447    10.71    07:30:59.72 +64:29:46.1   0641 5106   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### Source monitoring: measuring positions from /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-10-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_021904_TTUQ1b1x1_2103615_25aI19xD/monitoring_positions.txt Source monitoring: positions closer than 100 pix to a frame edge are recorded as edge Read 23328 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.1847 to 148.0521 deg, Dec +55.7746 to +67.2905 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.1847 to 148.0521 deg, Dec 55.7746 to 67.2905 deg Loaded 8541 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5535 out of 5722 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5722 out of 23328 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits via Tycho-2 util/pixel_flux_airmass_correction processing wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits Observation time (mid-exposure, UTC): JD 2461341.80384 (FITS header) Observing site: lat= +33.748056 deg lon= -101.958333 deg east-positive (SITELAT/SITELONG FITS header keywords) Frame center (pixel 4788.5 3194.5): RA= 128.57838 deg Dec= +61.99665 deg Frame center: alt= +31.866 deg az= 38.401 deg airmass= 1.8874 Header cross-check: CENTALT= 31.607 deg (difference +0.259 deg) Header cross-check: AIRMASS= 1.9033 (we compute 1.8874) Airmass zero-point fit: OK k= +0.3173 +/- 0.0115 mag/airmass N= 4161 airmass span 1.5372-2.5274 scatter 0.1789 mag Source monitoring: airmass zero-point for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits: OK +0.601979 -0.317338 1.8874 +0.3173 4161 0.9901 0.1789 1.5372 2.5274 Edge margin: 100.0 pix (FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_EDGE_MARGIN_PIX) Forced photometry (list mode): image=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits list=monitoring_pixlist2103976.tmp aperture=4.9 Image size: 9576 x 6388 Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). Saturation level: 57000.0 Calibration (from calib.txt_param_monitoring, fit_function=3): cal_mag = 0.000000 * x^2 + 1.000000 * x + 22.445800 Local star coverage test: 23328 stars in wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits.wcscat, test radius 301 pix (0.50 deg), 111.6 stars per circle at the frame's mean density Forced photometry: center=(3267.20, 3584.90) aperture=4.9 Annulus: inner=9.80 outer=24.50 edge margin=100.00 Background annulus: 1588 pixels Iterative clipping converged after 3 iterations, 1579/1588 pixels remain SExtractor background: mode=3505.92 median=3503.00 mean=3501.06 sigma=86.31 -> bg=3505.92 (1579 pixels) Aperture sum=67435.66 N_eff=18.8574 Net flux=1323.16 noise=374.82 SNR=3.53 Instrumental magnitude: -7.8040 Calibrated magnitude: 14.6418 Local star coverage at (3267.20, 3584.90): 144 catalog stars within 301 pix, 111.6 expected at the frame's mean star density Source monitoring: airmass zero-point term applied to the measurements on wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits Source monitoring: 1 position(s) measured on wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-17-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0382.fits (aperture 4.9 pix) Read 23325 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.1830 to 148.0081 deg, Dec +55.7748 to +67.2938 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.1830 to 148.0081 deg, Dec 55.7748 to 67.2938 deg Loaded 8541 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5536 out of 5716 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5716 out of 23325 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits via Tycho-2 util/pixel_flux_airmass_correction processing wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Observation time (mid-exposure, UTC): JD 2461341.80447 (FITS header) Observing site: lat= +33.748056 deg lon= -101.958333 deg east-positive (SITELAT/SITELONG FITS header keywords) Frame center (pixel 4788.5 3194.5): RA= 128.59125 deg Dec= +62.00042 deg Frame center: alt= +31.964 deg az= 38.425 deg airmass= 1.8822 Header cross-check: CENTALT= 31.710 deg (difference +0.254 deg) Header cross-check: AIRMASS= 1.8977 (we compute 1.8822) Airmass zero-point fit: OK k= +0.3143 +/- 0.0117 mag/airmass N= 4246 airmass span 1.5344-2.5160 scatter 0.1826 mag Source monitoring: airmass zero-point for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits: OK +0.588920 -0.314286 1.8822 +0.3143 4246 0.9816 0.1826 1.5344 2.5160 Edge margin: 100.0 pix (FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_EDGE_MARGIN_PIX) Forced photometry (list mode): image=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits list=monitoring_pixlist2103976.tmp aperture=4.9 Image size: 9576 x 6388 Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). Saturation level: 57000.0 Calibration (from calib.txt_param_monitoring, fit_function=3): cal_mag = 0.000000 * x^2 + 1.000000 * x + 22.450200 Local star coverage test: 23325 stars in wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits.wcscat, test radius 301 pix (0.50 deg), 111.5 stars per circle at the frame's mean density Forced photometry: center=(3263.67, 3582.81) aperture=4.9 Annulus: inner=9.80 outer=24.50 edge margin=100.00 Background annulus: 1589 pixels Iterative clipping converged after 2 iterations, 1583/1589 pixels remain SExtractor background: mode=3476.75 median=3478.00 mean=3478.83 sigma=88.48 -> bg=3476.75 (1583 pixels) Aperture sum=67448.29 N_eff=18.8574 Net flux=1885.73 noise=384.20 SNR=4.91 Instrumental magnitude: -8.1887 Calibrated magnitude: 14.2615 Local star coverage at (3263.67, 3582.81): 148 catalog stars within 301 pix, 111.5 expected at the frame's mean star density Source monitoring: airmass zero-point term applied to the measurements on wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits Source monitoring: 1 position(s) measured on wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0383.fits (aperture 4.9 pix) ########### Completed UMa-02-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461341.80384366 -observatory V36 15:05:12.26 -19:57:14.9 Mercury (1.3mag) 13:35:03.50 -16:02:39.2 Venus (-4.3mag) 09:17:11.23 +17:23:00.5 Mars (0.9mag) 09:44:09.40 +14:19:49.3 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:37:51.64 +01:08:57.7 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:09:57.21 +20:52:31.3 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:08:48.60 -00:35:20.1 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:17.54 -23:42:24.5 Pluto (14.5mag) 04:02:47.16 +25:36:57.7 Moon (-12.0mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 28 02:24 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461341.80384366: 09:44:16.55 +14:19:09.1 Io (6.0mag) 09:44:05.03 +14:20:13.1 Europa (6.1mag) 09:44:07.87 +14:19:58.9 Ganymede (5.5mag) 09:43:44.84 +14:22:06.9 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:45:10.13 +14:33:05.7 Himalia (15.5mag) 09:44:06.84 +14:20:04.1 Thebe (16.4mag) 09:43:34.92 +14:44:21.7 Elara (17.4mag) 09:45:24.19 +13:45:29.6 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 09:41:35.04 +14:50:40.5 Carme (18.7mag) 00:37:37.46 +01:09:02.2 Titan (8.2mag) 00:37:53.91 +01:08:39.9 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:38:08.59 +01:08:18.5 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:37:44.76 +01:09:16.8 Hyperion (14.2mag) 00:36:05.41 +00:56:37.6 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 28 02:24 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461341.80384366: 04:14:58.11 +18:50:40.3 JWST 19:02:03.64 +02:59:22.9 Chandra 06:49:29.45 +02:34:42.5 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 28 02:24 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461341.80384366 -observatory V36 03:37:56.83 +20:04:28.2 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:44:25.63 +37:57:35.2 17.9mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill) 07:44:30.78 +37:57:22.4 17.9mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 07:43:50.54 +37:57:38.7 17.9mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill) 05:02:50.02 +40:04:28.2 17.8mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski) 18:41:22.57 -33:03:26.8 14.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:44:38.25 -73:30:50.6 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:12:59.40 +35:08:19.2 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:28:19.16 +47:36:44.3 17.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 07:34:56.25 +25:20:53.5 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:07:42.74 +37:41:10.3 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:33:17.78 +40:57:45.4 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:44:45.99 -13:38:35.9 16.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:49:48.57 +14:38:09.4 15.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 14:08:38.00 -04:06:24.5 16.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 19:51:17.86 +56:53:11.4 15.4mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 13:01:50.05 +16:10:15.9 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:14:06.68 -60:29:05.0 14.0mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 19:28:16.55 -05:15:34.0 16.8mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS) 23:43:43.90 +15:36:44.1 17.0mag 2P/Encke 23:18:17.02 -27:28:23.0 15.2mag 10P/Tempel 02:32:44.71 +33:33:43.9 16.4mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:22:19.22 -09:32:32.1 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:13:06.33 -09:05:24.6 15.8mag 65P/Gunn 07:55:00.86 +14:12:35.4 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 02:41:24.70 +13:24:12.9 18.0mag 88P/Howell 08:39:18.75 +44:35:29.3 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:39:19.89 +07:54:35.8 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 12:15:00.15 +09:24:41.8 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 20:05:45.17 +12:36:10.0 10.0mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:59:00.99 -01:58:40.8 15.7mag 169P/NEAT 03:16:27.95 +02:41:27.0 15.1mag 220P/McNaught 06:20:55.57 +48:40:15.6 15.6mag 260P/McNaught 07:49:50.21 +25:11:57.8 17.6mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct 28 02:24 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92 10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27 21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82 01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9 01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88 00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77 22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42 01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3 18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.89 -10:37:05.90 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.05 15.79 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 28 02:24 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag 05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag 05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 28 02:24 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 00:24:47.391 -02:59:42.80 SN 2026aett 2026-10-08.29 20.1822 02:59:10.941 -20:30:34.93 AT 2026aets 2026-10-06.37 19.7659 05:53:12.927 +45:08:05.58 AT 2026aetr 2026-10-04.49 19.6205 06:25:25.402 +52:26:28.41 AT 2026aetq 2026-10-08.47 18.185 01:27:10.008 +12:53:26.88 TDE 2026aetp 2026-10-06.86 20.42 06:50:16.761 +21:22:25.66 AT 2026aeto 2026-10-07.46 19.0121 19:50:47.681 +36:22:07.63 AT 2026aetn 2026-10-05.31 19.441 07:21:33.096 +24:38:24.50 AT 2026aetl 2026-10-07.22 19.8 08:30:03.915 +01:34:45.41 AT 2026aetk 2026-10-05.52 19.5934 10:32:09.821 +11:37:46.17 AT 2026aetj 2026-10-01.53 18.5059 16:11:43.883 +20:59:33.48 AT 2026aeti 2026-10-03.14 19.2268 19:55:55.462 +58:10:08.22 AT 2026aeth 2026-10-02.16 20.7283 14:55:19.146 +37:33:21.65 AT 2026aetg 2026-10-02.14 17.2445 14:51:59.504 +47:04:29.76 AT 2026aetf 2026-10-02.14 19.1738 06:50:36.388 +58:36:08.80 SN 2026aete 2026-10-07.53 19.306 09:20:29.340 +55:06:35.79 SN 2026aetd 2026-10-07.54 17.677 08:26:28.724 +38:08:57.54 AT 2026aetc 2026-10-02.47 19.3657 06:41:51.189 +21:53:58.11 SN 2026aetb 2026-10-07.46 19.5374 08:34:43.981 +46:14:33.95 AT 2026aeta 2026-10-02.51 19.5454 09:00:29.362 -03:20:55.67 AT 2026aesz 2026-10-03.53 19.6849 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 28 02:24 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 94 C