######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=esa_tap (lib/gaia_dr2_cone_search.sh -> ESA Gaia Archive TAP service)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Gem-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Gem-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Gem-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 267039 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 267039 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.png' -> 'transient_report/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits_preview.png'
Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits

renamed 'Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.png' -> 'transient_report/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits_preview.png'
Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 630.2893
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 835.9389
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 8224.3986
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1881.3800
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 8182.6288
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1857.2574
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 13.0486
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.013
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 16.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-28T01:04:43.6775971' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-28T06:04:43.6775971' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61341.2532832986 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-28T06:04:53.5844811' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61341.253397963 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 106.666430625725 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 13.9995302034369 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.9719444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 83.0138888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.81730719081771 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Gem-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '07 06 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29545 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29545 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 88.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 36.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 14.801184 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.200896 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/d_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits :)
Spent 0.520046 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/d_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 16.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-28T01:05:28.5680425' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-28T06:05:28.5680425' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61341.2538028704 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-28T06:05:38.4723999' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61341.2539174999 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 106.66643054261 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 13.999530224764 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.1238888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 83.1111111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.78094343024954 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Gem-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '07 06 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29545 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29545 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 88.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 36.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 14.801184 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.200896 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/d_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits :)
Spent 0.508494 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/d_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits

fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461341.75339904
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
Image size: 945.3'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:47.070 +13:58:57.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:47.070 +13:58:57.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0317 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
Image size: 945.2'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:47.063 +13:58:32.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:47.063 +13:58:32.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0371 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:47.070 +13:58:57.62
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:47.063 +13:58:32.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00689 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FfyH182CLh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ms9q1tUss4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Bxb5loVrNO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vko8U7OZGp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.907000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.907000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 25465 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec +8.5626 to +19.2813 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec 8.5626 to 19.2813 deg
Loaded 18669 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13893 out of 14989 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14989 out of 25465 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.FfyH182CLh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3379, bad_region=0, passed=28861
Got 28861 stars (including 25451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4815 stars left (next iteration limit 5297)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4815 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=1312 n_q2=1159 n_q3=1286 n_q4=1058 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4815 N_valid=4815 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.327 p95_sep_arcsec=1.744 n_q1=1312 n_q2=1159 n_q3=1286 n_q4=1058 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Ms9q1tUss4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2216, bad_region=1, passed=25458
Got 25458 stars (including 23221 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 4805 stars left (next iteration limit 5284)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4805 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.777 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.790 n_q1=963 n_q2=1380 n_q3=1031 n_q4=1431 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4805 N_valid=4805 bias_ra_arcsec=0.009 bias_dec_arcsec=0.016 median_sep_arcsec=0.452 p95_sep_arcsec=3.614 n_q1=963 n_q2=1380 n_q3=1031 n_q4=1431 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Bxb5loVrNO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=507, bad_region=0, passed=5521
Got 5521 stars (including 5009 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5521 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4790 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5521 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5521 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5521 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4786 stars left (next iteration limit 5264)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4786 robust_rms=9.677 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.407 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.407 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4786 robust_rms=0.735 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.137 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.029 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4786 robust_rms=0.430 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.573 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.552 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4786 robust_rms_before=1.615 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.446 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.430 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.685 worst_region_rms_after=0.573 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.800 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.552
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.sip_refit.7crXyF/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.sip_refit.7crXyF/candidate.fits
Image size: 945.7'x627.1' 15.8(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.93"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:47.160 +13:58:56.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5521 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.sip_refit.7crXyF/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_3958527.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.sip_refit.7crXyF/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.Eybn5M' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_3958527.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.615 -> 0.430 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4786 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4581 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4581 pairs (4786 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4581 robust_rms=9.283 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.809 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.809 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4581 robust_rms=0.721 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.124 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.992 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4581 robust_rms=0.420 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.569 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.539 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4581 robust_rms_before=0.420 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.420 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.420 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.571 worst_region_rms_after=0.569 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.537 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.539
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.sip_refit.10s69X/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.sip_refit.10s69X/candidate.fits
Image size: 945.7'x627.1' 15.8(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.93"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:47.160 +13:58:56.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5521 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.sip_refit.10s69X/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_3961063.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.sip_refit.10s69X/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.xrK9ET' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_3961063.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.420 -> 0.420 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4581 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5521 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4581 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5521 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits N_match=4581 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.450 n_q1=1328 n_q2=848 n_q3=1517 n_q4=888 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.385
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4581 N_valid=4581 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.007 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.343 p95_sep_arcsec=1.004 n_q1=1328 n_q2=848 n_q3=1517 n_q4=888 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Vko8U7OZGp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=510, bad_region=0, passed=5563
Got 5563 stars (including 5046 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5563 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4787 stars left (next iteration limit 5263)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=10.010 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.858 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.858 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.700 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.043 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.043 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.422 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.537 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.537 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4787 robust_rms_before=1.540 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.433 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.422 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.662 worst_region_rms_after=0.537 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.669 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.537
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits.sip_refit.AV66dz/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits.sip_refit.AV66dz/candidate.fits
Image size: 945.6'x627.1' 15.8(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:47.144 +13:58:31.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5563 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits.sip_refit.AV66dz/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_3958487.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits.sip_refit.AV66dz/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.uhugVh' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_3958487.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.540 -> 0.422 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4787 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4586 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4586 pairs (4787 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4586 robust_rms=9.789 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.890 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.890 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4586 robust_rms=0.686 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.999 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.999 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4586 robust_rms=0.417 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.532 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.532 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4586 robust_rms_before=0.417 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.417 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.417 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.530 worst_region_rms_after=0.532 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.530 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.532
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.532 vs 0.530 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4586 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4586 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits N_match=4586 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.436 n_q1=1322 n_q2=853 n_q3=1511 n_q4=900 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4586 N_valid=4586 bias_ra_arcsec=0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=0.008 median_sep_arcsec=0.341 p95_sep_arcsec=0.973 n_q1=1322 n_q2=853 n_q3=1511 n_q4=900 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits sigma_overall=0.456 worst_q_ratio=1.254
ref2=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits sigma_overall=0.623 worst_q_ratio=1.268
new1=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits sigma_overall=0.433 worst_q_ratio=1.385
new2=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits sigma_overall=0.433 worst_q_ratio=1.197
reference average sigma_overall=0.5395 worst_q_ratio=1.261
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064_astrometric_residuals.png (4815 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034_astrometric_residuals.png (4805 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.57 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312_astrometric_residuals.png (4581 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313_astrometric_residuals.png (4586 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
Image size: 945.7'x627.1' 15.8(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.93"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:47.160 +13:58:56.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:47.160 +13:58:56.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0323 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
Image size: 945.6'x627.1' 15.8(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:47.144 +13:58:31.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:47.144 +13:58:31.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0377 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:47.160 +13:58:56.05
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:47.144 +13:58:31.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00688 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nh0S9g5P2Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zsqqZAorAc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E6A8uJKyzD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j8JwOPHo9m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16395 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16395 out of 208537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.747800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.747800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.17
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16395 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16395 out of 208537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 174030 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec +8.5565 to +19.2859 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec 8.5565 to 19.2859 deg
Loaded 18692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11904 out of 16168 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16168 out of 174030 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 80 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 12.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nh0S9g5P2Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=64, blended=33805, bad_region=0, passed=208473
Got 208473 stars (including 174370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 208473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=1196 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1203 n_q4=1161 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4803 N_valid=4803 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.009 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.015 median_sep_arcsec=0.310 p95_sep_arcsec=1.596 n_q1=1196 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1203 n_q4=1161 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zsqqZAorAc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=102, blended=23358, bad_region=2, passed=173928
Got 173928 stars (including 150412 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173928 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4795 stars left (next iteration limit 5272)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4795 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.729 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.784 n_q1=989 n_q2=1366 n_q3=1028 n_q4=1412 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4795 N_valid=4795 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.014 bias_dec_arcsec=0.016 median_sep_arcsec=0.448 p95_sep_arcsec=3.326 n_q1=989 n_q2=1366 n_q3=1028 n_q4=1412 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.E6A8uJKyzD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2038, bad_region=1, passed=51810
Got 51810 stars (including 49688 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51810 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013135 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010508 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4781 stars left (next iteration limit 5258)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=9.366 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.755 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.755 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.726 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.050 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.050 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.568 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.543 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4781 robust_rms_before=0.428 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.401 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.428 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.570 worst_region_rms_after=0.568 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.550 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.543
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.570 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.570 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.401 arcsec matched=4781
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits N_match=4781 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.379 n_q1=1432 n_q2=843 n_q3=1571 n_q4=935 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.060
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4781 N_valid=4781 bias_ra_arcsec=0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.012 median_sep_arcsec=0.356 p95_sep_arcsec=1.459 n_q1=1432 n_q2=843 n_q3=1571 n_q4=935 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.j8JwOPHo9m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2059, bad_region=2, passed=52375
Got 52375 stars (including 50231 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52375 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013133 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010507 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52375 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52375 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52375 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4782 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4782 robust_rms=9.751 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.046 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.046 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4782 robust_rms=0.664 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.106 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.106 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4782 robust_rms=0.415 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.535 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.535 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4782 robust_rms_before=0.416 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.405 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.415 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.538 worst_region_rms_after=0.535 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.538 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.535
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.538 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.538 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.405 arcsec matched=4782
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits N_match=4782 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1421 n_q2=848 n_q3=1565 n_q4=948 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.063
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4782 N_valid=4782 bias_ra_arcsec=0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.347 p95_sep_arcsec=1.446 n_q1=1421 n_q2=848 n_q3=1565 n_q4=948 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:42:35.84 +16:29:49.0: 15.49 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:43:50.64 +12:12:52.5: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:11:21.22 +15:19:09.9: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:25:02.95 +16:23:44.5: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:06:29.82 +10:27:25.0: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:20:02.05 +16:15:57.9: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:30:28.22 +16:15:48.3: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:05:44.92 +10:22:54.5: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:25:02.95 +16:23:44.5: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:43:50.64 +12:12:52.5: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:06:29.82 +10:27:25.0: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:11:21.22 +15:19:09.9: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:30:28.22 +16:15:48.3: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:42:35.84 +16:29:49.0: 15.44 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:20:02.05 +16:15:57.9: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:29.82 +10:27:25.0: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3790 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:02.95 +16:23:44.5: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4385 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:50.64 +12:12:52.5: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7068 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:21.22 +15:19:09.9: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6049 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:28.22 +16:15:48.3: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3185 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:42:35.84 +16:29:49.0: ref_mag=15.47 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=13.0946 delta=2.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:02.05 +16:15:57.9: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3891 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:05:44.92 +10:22:54.5: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:44.92 +10:22:54.5: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9814 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:01:59.07 +10:16:08.1: 10.02 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:50:02.48 +12:04:50.7: 11.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:16:40.76 +16:09:06.8: 11.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:01:59.07 +10:16:08.1: 9.96 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.99 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:59.07 +10:16:08.1: ref_mag=9.99 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3094 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:58:03.96 +14:13:09.9: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:32:46.62 +16:20:12.4: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:50:02.48 +12:04:50.7: 11.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:16:40.76 +16:09:06.8: 11.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:50:02.48 +12:04:50.7: ref_mag=11.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4574 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:40.76 +16:09:06.8: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2641 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:58:03.96 +14:13:09.9: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:32:46.62 +16:20:12.4: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:03.96 +14:13:09.9: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7701 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:32:46.62 +16:20:12.4: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7658 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:47:05.15 +17:07:46.3: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:58:17.13 +14:15:29.4: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:47:05.15 +17:07:46.3: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:05.15 +17:07:46.3: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4560 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:58:17.13 +14:15:29.4: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:51:13.76 +15:03:08.6: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:36:58.53 +14:10:45.3: 12.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:17.13 +14:15:29.4: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3440 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:10:02.88 +09:18:01.1: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:51:13.76 +15:03:08.6: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:36:58.53 +14:10:45.3: 12.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:13.76 +15:03:08.6: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6953 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:36:58.53 +14:10:45.3: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7753 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:10:02.88 +09:18:01.1: 12.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:10:02.88 +09:18:01.1: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3409 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:58:14.87 +14:15:43.5: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:09:51.65 +09:15:48.9: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:16:38.51 +16:09:37.1: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:58:14.87 +14:15:43.5: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:53:14.59 +10:36:51.0: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:14.87 +14:15:43.5: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7456 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:16:38.51 +16:09:37.1: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:09:51.65 +09:15:48.9: 12.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:38.51 +16:09:37.1: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8037 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:51.65 +09:15:48.9: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7428 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:53:14.59 +10:36:51.0: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:14.59 +10:36:51.0: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9048 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:12:48.99 +14:36:03.1: 9.28 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:12:48.99 +14:36:03.1: 9.81 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.41 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:12:48.99 +14:36:03.1: ref_mag=9.41 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=8.4299 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out121052.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out227458.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 28s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227452_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227452_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 13.44 | 06:50:51.16 +13:24:46.1 | 2468 2799 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 06:50:51.18 +13:24:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227458_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
Preparing report for the candidate 227458_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227464_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227464_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.25340 | 2461341.75340 | 12.60 | 07:11:21.29 +15:19:10.5 | 5426 4023 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.61 | 07:11:21.15 +15:19:09.2 | 5425 4027 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227465_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227465_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.25340 | 2461341.75340 | 12.71 | 06:43:50.57 +12:12:52.0 | 1439 2055 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.71 | 06:43:50.71 +12:12:53.0 | 1439 2059 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227467_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227467_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.42 | 06:59:19.82 +14:42:55.0 | 3693 3608 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 06:59:19.78 +14:42:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227468_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227468_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.25340 | 2461341.75340 | 12.32 | 07:30:28.28 +16:15:48.3 | 8174 4734 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.32 | 07:30:28.17 +16:15:48.3 | 8173 4738 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227470_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227470_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.25340 | 2461341.75340 | 12.38 | 07:25:02.99 +16:23:44.9 | 7381 4766 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.54 | 07:25:02.92 +16:23:44.1 | 7381 4770 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227471_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227471_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.25340 | 2461341.75340 | 12.36 | 07:20:02.05 +16:15:57.0 | 6659 4648 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.42 | 07:20:02.05 +16:15:58.8 | 6659 4653 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227472_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227472_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.25340 | 2461341.75340 | 12.29 | 07:06:29.80 +10:27:25.4 | 4810 1072 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.51 | 07:06:29.83 +10:27:24.6 | 4810 1076 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227473_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227473_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.36 | 07:02:44.96 +13:06:40.6 | 4215 2658 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 07:02:44.94 +13:06:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227475_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227475_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.16 | 07:02:08.53 +10:45:41.7 | 4162 1240 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227476_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227476_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.25340 | 2461341.75340 | 12.12 | 07:05:44.92 +10:22:55.0 | 4701 1023 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 11.89 | 07:05:44.92 +10:22:54.1 | 4701 1027 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227477_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227477_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.10 | 07:11:59.28 +14:35:42.7 | 5533 3595 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 07:11:59.29 +14:35:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227478_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227478_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.19 | 06:43:38.47 +19:02:25.6 | 1378 6201 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227485_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227485_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 11.94 | 07:23:44.15 +16:43:41.5 | 7181 4960 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 07:23:44.15 +16:43:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227489_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227489_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 11.43 | 06:51:09.04 +15:47:55.7 | 2491 4239 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 06:51:09.04 +15:47:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227491_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227491_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.25340 | 2461341.75340 | 10.29 | 07:01:59.07 +10:16:08.2 | 4146 0937 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 10.33 | 07:01:59.07 +10:16:08.0 | 4146 0941 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227570_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227570_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 10.62 | 06:38:32.22 +17:14:27.8 | 0641 5106 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227593_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227593_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 10.45 | 07:14:37.76 +16:52:12.6 | 5864 4980 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227666_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227666_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 10.91 | 07:13:09.77 +16:09:34.5 | 5669 4543 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 07:13:09.79 +16:09:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227728_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227728_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.25340 | 2461341.75340 | 11.27 | 07:16:40.76 +16:09:06.8 | 6177 4556 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 11.26 | 07:16:40.77 +16:09:06.8 | 6177 4560 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227741_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227741_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 11.19 | 07:02:55.39 +11:44:59.6 | 4262 1839 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227758_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227758_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 11.54 | 06:43:56.06 +13:15:38.0 | 1448 2692 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 06:43:56.06 +13:15:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227759_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227759_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.25340 | 2461341.75340 | 11.48 | 06:50:02.47 +12:04:51.1 | 2359 1988 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 11.44 | 06:50:02.48 +12:04:50.3 | 2359 1992 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227774_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227774_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 11.86 | 06:42:18.95 +17:38:00.1 | 1193 5343 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 06:42:18.87 +17:37:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227781_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227781_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 11.68 | 06:55:16.02 +16:20:43.8 | 3083 4578 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227825_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227825_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 11.37 | 07:08:08.84 +09:37:22.9 | 5070 0580 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227847_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227847_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 11.60 | 07:13:25.65 +16:11:54.5 | 5706 4568 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 07:13:25.66 +16:11:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227864_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227864_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.25340 | 2461341.75340 | 11.78 | 06:58:03.96 +14:13:09.6 | 3516 3301 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 11.76 | 06:58:03.96 +14:13:10.2 | 3516 3306 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227925_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227925_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.25340 | 2461341.75340 | 11.71 | 07:32:46.59 +16:20:13.0 | 8508 4801 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 11.84 | 07:32:46.66 +16:20:11.8 | 8508 4805 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227950_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227950_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 11.89 | 07:16:52.40 +16:13:08.5 | 6203 4602 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227952_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227952_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 11.60 | 07:32:07.06 +11:15:21.9 | 8582 1727 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227970_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227970_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.05 | 06:37:26.50 +09:03:21.5 | 0477 0121 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227997_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 227997_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.61 | 06:37:30.48 +16:25:04.7 | 0491 4605 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 06:37:30.57 +16:25:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228012_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228012_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.29 | 06:37:33.50 +12:07:52.6 | 0499 2000 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 06:37:33.51 +12:07:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228021_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228021_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.26 | 07:03:45.27 +18:27:42.7 | 4273 5886 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228035_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228035_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.25340 | 2461341.75340 | 12.42 | 06:47:05.07 +17:07:46.9 | 1890 5034 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.51 | 06:47:05.24 +17:07:45.6 | 1890 5038 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228037_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228037_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.22 | 07:11:06.75 +17:38:12.1 | 5342 5422 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228070_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228070_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.43 | 07:00:08.03 +16:04:47.4 | 3790 4433 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 07:00:08.05 +16:04:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228085_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228085_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.49 | 07:00:40.75 +16:56:19.8 | 3856 4953 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 07:00:40.70 +16:56:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228104_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228104_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.25340 | 2461341.75340 | 12.34 | 06:58:17.10 +14:15:28.9 | 3547 3326 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.35 | 06:58:17.16 +14:15:30.0 | 3547 3330 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228109_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228109_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.36 | 06:40:59.48 +09:55:19.0 | 1016 0659 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 06:40:59.41 +09:55:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228135_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228135_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.05 | 07:22:07.49 +10:00:41.6 | 7134 0898 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228159_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228159_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.75 | 06:35:56.01 +16:27:36.6 | 0258 4632 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 06:35:55.98 +16:27:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228172_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228172_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.58 | 06:49:49.80 +16:13:25.9 | 2295 4493 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 06:49:49.80 +16:13:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228179_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228179_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.41 | 07:01:48.00 +17:59:34.3 | 4001 5594 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 07:01:48.01 +17:59:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228250_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228250_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.35 | 07:02:43.16 +15:59:49.5 | 4165 4393 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 07:02:43.12 +15:59:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228269_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228269_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.25340 | 2461341.75340 | 12.67 | 06:51:13.69 +15:03:06.3 | 2509 3784 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.72 | 06:51:13.83 +15:03:10.9 | 2510 3789 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228273_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228273_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.56 | 06:41:04.31 +09:51:53.1 | 1028 0625 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 06:41:04.34 +09:51:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228281_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228281_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.25340 | 2461341.75340 | 12.79 | 06:36:58.58 +14:10:44.9 | 0413 3240 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.77 | 06:36:58.49 +14:10:45.7 | 0413 3244 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228286_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228286_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.25340 | 2461341.75340 | 12.34 | 07:10:02.88 +09:18:01.7 | 5359 0390 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.34 | 07:10:02.88 +09:18:00.4 | 5358 0394 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228300_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228300_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.50 | 06:58:22.34 +13:18:15.3 | 3572 2756 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 06:58:22.37 +13:18:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228308_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228308_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.81 | 06:35:59.98 +14:14:18.7 | 0267 3280 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 06:35:59.98 +14:14:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228340_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228340_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.83 | 07:02:37.16 +17:45:34.3 | 4122 5456 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 07:02:37.10 +17:45:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228343_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228343_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.77 | 06:45:19.27 +13:20:09.2 | 1653 2741 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 06:45:19.30 +13:20:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228351_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228351_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.69 | 06:35:55.46 +17:12:19.6 | 0257 5087 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 06:35:55.47 +17:12:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228383_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228383_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.62 | 07:03:50.07 +12:33:44.2 | 4383 2332 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 07:03:50.06 +12:33:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228385_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228385_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.30 | 07:20:13.06 +15:07:54.5 | 6715 3970 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 07:20:13.04 +15:07:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228402_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228402_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.25340 | 2461341.75340 | 12.75 | 06:58:14.85 +14:15:43.2 | 3542 3328 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.74 | 06:58:14.90 +14:15:43.9 | 3542 3332 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228415_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228415_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.66 | 07:02:41.31 +10:05:46.5 | 4253 0840 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 07:02:41.24 +10:05:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228473_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228473_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.85 | 07:08:50.70 +16:55:29.0 | 5031 4980 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 07:08:50.72 +16:55:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228486_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228486_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.88 | 07:01:46.71 +16:54:09.8 | 4015 4935 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228544_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228544_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.25340 | 2461341.75340 | 12.73 | 07:09:51.59 +09:15:49.5 | 5331 0367 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.76 | 07:09:51.70 +09:15:48.3 | 5332 0371 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228547_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228547_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.90 | 07:05:09.34 +14:14:04.2 | 4547 3343 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 07:05:09.37 +14:14:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228549_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228549_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.25340 | 2461341.75340 | 12.78 | 07:16:38.53 +16:09:36.5 | 6171 4561 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.82 | 07:16:38.50 +16:09:37.6 | 6171 4565 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228573_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228573_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 28.25340 | 2461341.75340 | 13.02 | 06:53:14.48 +10:36:51.2 | 2846 1112 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-04-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0312.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.83 | 06:53:14.70 +10:36:50.8 | 2846 1116 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228584_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228584_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.86 | 07:28:31.76 +16:57:37.2 | 7869 5142 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228594_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228594_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.43 | 07:33:20.28 +10:10:40.9 | 8801 1083 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228602_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228602_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 13.43 | 06:49:39.93 +15:47:55.5 | 2275 4236 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228603_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228603_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.97 | 07:08:59.75 +11:33:18.0 | 5158 1751 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228608_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 228608_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.98 | 07:18:10.33 +12:06:38.4 | 6494 2139 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121052_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
Preparing report for the candidate 121052_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68285_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 68285_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 10.61 | 07:22:50.09 +12:12:20.4 | 7177 2228 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 07:22:50.05 +12:12:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51429_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 51429_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.44 | 07:21:44.10 +11:24:40.3 | 7037 1741 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 07:21:44.16 +11:24:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26007_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 26007_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 11.88 | 06:44:57.25 +09:50:47.7 | 1613 0624 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 06:44:57.24 +09:50:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10414_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 10414_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 10.41 | 06:45:05.75 +09:02:19.5 | 1637 0131 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 06:45:05.74 +09:02:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117970_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 117970_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 10.54 | 06:35:02.42 +14:10:55.7 | 0124 3246 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 13.05 | 07:04:57.43 +13:56:48.8 | 4523 3169 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 07:04:57.43 +13:56:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43550_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 43550_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 12.82 | 06:54:53.68 +10:50:41.5 | 3089 1261 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 06:54:53.66 +10:50:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313
The candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 28.25392 | 2461341.75392 | 8.27 | 07:08:42.60 +10:01:26.8 | 5146 0826 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-28_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_010719_TTUQ1b1x1_3902823_XzUx4Zvj/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-28_01-05-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0313.fits |
**** FOUND 07:08:42.60 +10:01:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 31s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:12:48.99 +14:36:03.1
06:42:35.84 +16:29:49.0
########### Completed Gem-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
06:42:35.84 +16:29:49.0
07:12:48.99 +14:36:03.1
###################################################################################
06:42:35.84 +16:29:49.0 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
07:12:48.99 +14:36:03.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
07:12:48.99 +14:36:03.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
07:12:48.99 +14:36:03.1 -- a known variable star
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
07:12:48.99 +14:36:03.1
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461341.75339904 -observatory V36
15:05:18.56 -19:58:17.7 Mercury (1.3mag)
13:35:08.70 -16:03:53.5 Venus (-4.3mag)
09:17:04.89 +17:23:24.7 Mars (0.9mag)
09:44:07.84 +14:19:56.4 Jupiter (-2.0mag)
00:37:52.41 +01:09:02.2 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:09:57.66 +20:52:32.3 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:08:48.86 -00:35:18.5 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:17.47 -23:42:24.9 Pluto (14.5mag)
04:00:34.54 +25:25:13.3 Moon (-12.0mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 28 01:12 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461341.75339904:
09:44:14.88 +14:19:16.9 Io (6.0mag)
09:44:02.64 +14:20:25.0 Europa (6.1mag)
09:44:07.07 +14:20:01.7 Ganymede (5.5mag)
09:43:42.99 +14:22:15.7 Callisto (6.8mag)
09:45:08.35 +14:33:14.6 Himalia (15.5mag)
09:44:04.70 +14:20:14.1 Thebe (16.4mag)
09:43:33.19 +14:44:28.5 Elara (17.4mag)
09:45:22.87 +13:45:35.8 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
09:41:33.69 +14:50:47.0 Carme (18.7mag)
00:37:38.24 +01:09:07.1 Titan (8.2mag)
00:37:54.35 +01:08:44.2 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:38:09.22 +01:08:22.2 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:37:45.76 +01:09:21.3 Hyperion (14.2mag)
00:36:06.19 +00:56:42.0 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 28 01:12 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461341.75339904:
04:14:59.77 +18:50:44.1 JWST
18:51:45.08 +07:18:38.9 Chandra
06:35:24.74 +11:25:23.3 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 28 01:12 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461341.75339904 -observatory V36
03:37:58.90 +20:04:31.2 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
07:44:24.40 +37:57:22.7 17.9mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill)
07:44:29.54 +37:57:09.9 17.9mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill)
07:43:49.31 +37:57:26.2 17.9mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill)
05:02:50.25 +40:04:53.6 17.8mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski)
18:41:19.32 -33:03:32.3 14.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:44:37.77 -73:30:38.6 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:13:00.09 +35:08:14.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:28:25.99 +47:37:05.0 17.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
07:34:55.74 +25:20:53.9 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:07:42.12 +37:40:45.8 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:33:16.09 +40:57:49.5 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:44:46.70 -13:38:37.3 16.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:49:42.45 +14:38:23.5 15.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
14:08:34.71 -04:06:10.0 16.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
19:51:05.97 +56:54:59.5 15.4mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
13:01:47.15 +16:09:52.8 17.7mag A/2026 E1
16:14:12.18 -60:25:59.2 14.0mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
19:28:13.78 -05:15:30.1 16.8mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS)
23:43:51.65 +15:37:29.0 17.0mag 2P/Encke
23:18:13.37 -27:29:13.3 15.2mag 10P/Tempel
02:32:41.49 +33:35:04.4 16.4mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:22:17.27 -09:32:17.3 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:13:07.72 -09:05:25.4 15.8mag 65P/Gunn
07:54:58.05 +14:12:53.9 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
02:41:28.28 +13:24:23.6 18.0mag 88P/Howell
08:39:08.33 +44:34:45.9 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
09:39:13.81 +07:55:44.1 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
12:14:54.16 +09:25:22.6 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
20:05:55.04 +12:35:09.5 10.0mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:58:54.15 -01:58:05.7 15.7mag 169P/NEAT
03:16:30.88 +02:41:43.8 15.1mag 220P/McNaught
06:20:54.18 +48:39:40.0 15.6mag 260P/McNaught
07:49:46.73 +25:12:01.3 17.6mag 266P/Christensen
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct 28 01:12 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92
10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27
21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82
01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9
01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88
00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77
22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42
01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3
18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23
21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83
03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75
04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52
09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93
02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85
02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61
22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56
15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.89 -10:37:05.90 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.05 15.79
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 28 01:12 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag
00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag
01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag
17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag
09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag
00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag
04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag
05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag
05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 28 01:12 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
00:24:47.391 -02:59:42.80 SN 2026aett 2026-10-08.29 20.1822
02:59:10.941 -20:30:34.93 AT 2026aets 2026-10-06.37 19.7659
05:53:12.927 +45:08:05.58 AT 2026aetr 2026-10-04.49 19.6205
06:25:25.402 +52:26:28.41 AT 2026aetq 2026-10-08.47 18.185
01:27:10.008 +12:53:26.88 TDE 2026aetp 2026-10-06.86 20.42
06:50:16.761 +21:22:25.66 AT 2026aeto 2026-10-07.46 19.0121
19:50:47.681 +36:22:07.63 AT 2026aetn 2026-10-05.31 19.441
07:21:33.096 +24:38:24.50 AT 2026aetl 2026-10-07.22 19.8
08:30:03.915 +01:34:45.41 AT 2026aetk 2026-10-05.52 19.5934
10:32:09.821 +11:37:46.17 AT 2026aetj 2026-10-01.53 18.5059
16:11:43.883 +20:59:33.48 AT 2026aeti 2026-10-03.14 19.2268
19:55:55.462 +58:10:08.22 AT 2026aeth 2026-10-02.16 20.7283
14:55:19.146 +37:33:21.65 AT 2026aetg 2026-10-02.14 17.2445
14:51:59.504 +47:04:29.76 AT 2026aetf 2026-10-02.14 19.1738
06:50:36.388 +58:36:08.80 SN 2026aete 2026-10-07.53 19.306
09:20:29.340 +55:06:35.79 SN 2026aetd 2026-10-07.54 17.677
08:26:28.724 +38:08:57.54 AT 2026aetc 2026-10-02.47 19.3657
06:41:51.189 +21:53:58.11 SN 2026aetb 2026-10-07.46 19.5374
08:34:43.981 +46:14:33.95 AT 2026aeta 2026-10-02.51 19.5454
09:00:29.362 -03:20:55.67 AT 2026aesz 2026-10-03.53 19.6849
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 28 01:12 tns_transients_list.txt