Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 28.1939  2461341.6939  12.21  23:33:01.73 -08:50:01.0
 73.89383 -63.95985 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 3.0 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
106 Dione                   -1     -0       1  12.2     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:01.73 -08:50:01.0:  15.24 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:01.73 -08:50:01.0:  15.26 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits -crosshair 8858.58594 2682.97998 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits -crosshair 8855.91895 2681.63867 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 28.19386 23 33 01.73 -08 50 01.0          12.2 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 28.19361 23 33 01.73 -08 50 00.9          12.2 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 10 28.19412 23 33 01.73 -08 50 01.1          12.2 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 10 28.1939*  23 33 01.73 -08 50 01.0  12.2 U             Aqr       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461341.6939,12.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261028.1939 12.21CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 28.1939  2461341.6939  13.27  23:52:05.47 -09:56:45.9
 80.96464 -67.84146 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 2.9 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
217 Eudora                  -1     -0       1  13.2     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:05.47 -09:56:45.9:  15.49 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:05.47 -09:56:45.9:  15.53 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits -crosshair 5969.86523 3198.36768 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits -crosshair 5967.22168 3197.10425 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 28.19386 23 52 05.47 -09 56 45.9          13.3 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 28.19361 23 52 05.47 -09 56 45.9          13.3 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 10 28.19412 23 52 05.48 -09 56 46.0          13.3 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 10 28.1939*  23 52 05.47 -09 56 45.9  13.3 U             Aqr       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461341.6939,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261028.1939 13.27CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
First image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Last  image: 2461341.69411804 28.10.2026 04:39:21.799   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  4178
Objects passed selection criteria:  4175
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 3750.5
Average stars matched: 3672.5 (97.9203 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   230892 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Oct 27 23:44:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
First image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Last  image: 2461341.69411804 28.10.2026 04:39:21.799   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 126
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  22620
Objects passed selection criteria:  22555
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 21244
Average stars matched: 20329.2 (95.6941 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   246240 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Oct 27 23:45:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=esa_tap (lib/gaia_dr2_cone_search.sh -> ESA Gaia Archive TAP service)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 316458 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 316458 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits_preview.png'

Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits


renamed 'Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits_preview.png'

Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 765.4159
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 439.5498
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3176.8935
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 759.2058
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3184.1777
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 759.3658
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.15055
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 15.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-27T23:38:37.5975627' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-28T04:38:37.5975627' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61341.1934907059 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-28T04:38:47.5046553' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61341.1936053704 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.999716364994 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -9.99949045288356 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =                46.24 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =              185.675 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.38331924646059 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29527 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29527 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 14.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 90.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               903.69 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 15.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 29.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             4.300344 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits :)

Spent 0.557511 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 15.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-27T23:39:21.7997867' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-28T04:39:21.7997867' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61341.1940023033 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-28T04:39:31.7058661' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61341.1941169561 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.999716361661 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -9.99949044821822 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     46.2244444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     185.934722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.38367780010672 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29527 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29527 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 14.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 90.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               903.69 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 15.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 29.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             4.300344 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits :)

Spent 0.561514 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits



fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461341.69360645
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:03.029 -10:01:47.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:03.029 -10:01:47.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0300 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.939 -10:01:54.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.939 -10:01:54.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0307 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:00:03.029 -10:01:47.33
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:01.939 -10:01:54.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00489 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kftX2Q4sAf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2Vv7cHyamK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tbkxKCxrfY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Dwpjz9AyS0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.569700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.569700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.95

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.95

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=7.1)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3202 out of 3251 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3251 out of 4358 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.6 pix  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 2.3 pix  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.9 mag.  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 15.0 mag.  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.8 (SNR )  11.5 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.kftX2Q4sAf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=0, passed=4374
Got 4374 stars (including 4092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0780, gap 8.0780 to 351.9535
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0777, gap 8.0777 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 3991 stars left (next iteration limit 4390)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=3991 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1080 n_q2=969 n_q3=999 n_q4=943 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3991 N_valid=3991 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.020 bias_dec_arcsec=0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.307 p95_sep_arcsec=1.472 n_q1=1080 n_q2=969 n_q3=999 n_q4=943 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2Vv7cHyamK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, bad_region=0, passed=4358
Got 4358 stars (including 4088 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0779, gap 8.0779 to 351.9535
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0776, gap 8.0776 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Excluding outliers - 3988 stars left (next iteration limit 4386)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=3988 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1022 n_q2=971 n_q3=1079 n_q4=916 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.078
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3988 N_valid=3988 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.008 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.006 median_sep_arcsec=0.264 p95_sep_arcsec=1.131 n_q1=1022 n_q2=971 n_q3=1079 n_q4=916 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.tbkxKCxrfY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=299, bad_region=0, passed=3205
Got 3205 stars (including 2903 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3205 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7417 through 0 to 8.0947, gap 8.0947 to 351.7417
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 429 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2839 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7414 through 0 to 8.0952, gap 8.0952 to 351.7414
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 429 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2839 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Excluding outliers - 2837 stars left (next iteration limit 3120)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2837 robust_rms=13.895 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.546 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.546 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2837 robust_rms=0.425 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.864 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.864 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2837 robust_rms=0.258 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.292 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.279 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2837 robust_rms_before=1.072 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.274 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.258 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.320 worst_region_rms_after=0.292 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.129 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.279
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.320 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.320 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.274 arcsec matched=2837
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits N_match=2837 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=637 n_q2=726 n_q3=716 n_q4=758 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2837 N_valid=2837 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.633 bias_dec_arcsec=0.509 median_sep_arcsec=1.021 p95_sep_arcsec=1.736 n_q1=637 n_q2=726 n_q3=716 n_q4=758 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Dwpjz9AyS0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=298, bad_region=0, passed=3170
Got 3170 stars (including 2871 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3170 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7418 through 0 to 8.0358, gap 8.0358 to 351.7418
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 429 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2806 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7414 through 0 to 8.0363, gap 8.0363 to 351.7414
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 429 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2806 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 2804 stars left (next iteration limit 3084)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2804 robust_rms=13.719 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.233 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.233 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2804 robust_rms=0.450 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.751 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.751 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2804 robust_rms=0.278 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.325 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.281 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2804 robust_rms_before=1.089 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.282 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.278 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.320 worst_region_rms_after=0.325 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.145 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.281
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.320 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.320 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.282 arcsec matched=2804
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits N_match=2804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=615 n_q2=708 n_q3=718 n_q4=763 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2804 N_valid=2804 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.639 bias_dec_arcsec=0.527 median_sep_arcsec=1.017 p95_sep_arcsec=1.792 n_q1=615 n_q2=708 n_q3=718 n_q4=763 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits sigma_overall=0.350 worst_q_ratio=1.109
ref2=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.078
new1=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits sigma_overall=0.277 worst_q_ratio=1.137
new2=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits sigma_overall=0.286 worst_q_ratio=1.163
reference average sigma_overall=0.3205 worst_q_ratio=1.0935
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021_astrometric_residuals.png (3991 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490_astrometric_residuals.png (3988 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228_astrometric_residuals.png (2837 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229_astrometric_residuals.png (2804 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20248_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 20248_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    10.25    00:19:24.41 -08:51:12.0   1931 2381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

**** FOUND  00:19:24.41 -08:51:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00255_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 00255_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    8.89    00:02:07.41 -14:40:33.4   4364 5983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

**** FOUND  00:02:07.41 -14:40:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:03.029 -10:01:47.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:03.029 -10:01:47.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0300 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.939 -10:01:54.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.939 -10:01:54.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0307 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:00:03.029 -10:01:47.33
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:01.939 -10:01:54.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00489 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Cr4wlTVvCS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qV6iOd9w91
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s4Z99VWuIW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jPZpHh0sdU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.388800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.388800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.08

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.08

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=5.3)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 23415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4212 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3459 out of 3633 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 23415 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 118 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.4 pix  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 2.2 pix  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 2.0 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
 2.0 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.1 mag.  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 15.1 mag.  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 14.9 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
 14.9 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.9 (SNR )  13.9 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Cr4wlTVvCS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=913, bad_region=0, passed=22729
Got 22729 stars (including 21779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22729 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9459 through 0 to 8.0985, gap 8.0985 to 351.9459
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9463 through 0 to 8.0982, gap 8.0982 to 351.9463
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5350)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1176 n_q4=1179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4864 N_valid=4864 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.007 median_sep_arcsec=0.320 p95_sep_arcsec=1.370 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1176 n_q4=1179 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qV6iOd9w91 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=831, bad_region=0, passed=23408
Got 23408 stars (including 22542 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23408 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9462 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9462
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9465 through 0 to 8.0899, gap 8.0899 to 351.9465
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5346)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1259 n_q2=1185 n_q3=1245 n_q4=1171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4860 N_valid=4860 bias_ra_arcsec=0.000 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.016 median_sep_arcsec=0.269 p95_sep_arcsec=1.063 n_q1=1259 n_q2=1185 n_q3=1245 n_q4=1171 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.s4Z99VWuIW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=662, bad_region=18, passed=19791
Got 19791 stars (including 19078 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19791 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7030 through 0 to 8.0947, gap 8.0947 to 351.7030
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 429 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7026 through 0 to 8.0952, gap 8.0952 to 351.7026
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 429 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 4867 stars left (next iteration limit 5353)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4867 robust_rms=13.728 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.441 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.441 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4867 robust_rms=0.459 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.834 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.834 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4867 robust_rms=0.287 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.319 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.319 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4867 robust_rms_before=1.081 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.293 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.287 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.329 worst_region_rms_after=0.319 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.135 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.319
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.329 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.329 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.293 arcsec matched=4867
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits N_match=4867 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=1169 n_q2=1284 n_q3=1197 n_q4=1217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.080
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4867 N_valid=4867 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.633 bias_dec_arcsec=0.527 median_sep_arcsec=1.024 p95_sep_arcsec=1.742 n_q1=1169 n_q2=1284 n_q3=1197 n_q4=1217 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jPZpHh0sdU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=654, bad_region=21, passed=19848
Got 19848 stars (including 19138 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19848 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7029 through 0 to 8.0925, gap 8.0925 to 351.7029
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 429 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7026 through 0 to 8.0931, gap 8.0931 to 351.7026
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 429 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5348)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=13.767 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.627 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.627 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=0.483 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.787 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.787 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=0.300 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.328 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.323 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4860 robust_rms_before=1.108 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.300 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.300 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.337 worst_region_rms_after=0.328 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.168 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.323
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.337 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.337 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.300 arcsec matched=4860
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=1184 n_q2=1278 n_q3=1184 n_q4=1214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4860 N_valid=4860 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.644 bias_dec_arcsec=0.556 median_sep_arcsec=1.036 p95_sep_arcsec=1.811 n_q1=1184 n_q2=1278 n_q3=1184 n_q4=1214 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:14:07.04 -06:55:57.6:  12.23 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:54:45.78 -08:55:57.8:  13.18 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:13:02.61 -05:59:51.9:  13.84 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:39:44.49 -07:33:16.6:  12.84 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:54:35.20 -07:43:44.8:  12.84 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:57:51.39 -07:49:34.8:  12.49 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:08:45.35 -06:28:02.3:  13.48 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:26:57.72 -14:40:51.3:  13.20 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:36.28 -07:55:57.7:  11.80 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:45:52.02 -10:20:17.8:  12.20 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:45:52.02 -10:20:17.8:  12.52 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:54:45.78 -08:55:57.8:  13.45 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:57:51.39 -07:49:34.8:  12.71 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:26:57.72 -14:40:51.3:  13.42 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:13:02.61 -05:59:51.9:  13.99 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:08:45.35 -06:28:02.3:  14.01 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:54:35.20 -07:43:44.8:  12.84 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:39:44.49 -07:33:16.6:  13.09 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:36.28 -07:55:57.7:  12.10 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:14:07.04 -06:55:57.6:  12.43 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.63 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.29 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:45.78 -08:55:57.8: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1744 delta=-0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.91 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:08:45.35 -06:28:02.3: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2601 delta=-0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:57:51.39 -07:49:34.8: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4230 delta=-0.84 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:45:52.02 -10:20:17.8: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0995 delta=-0.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:02.61 -05:59:51.9: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2586 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:35.20 -07:43:44.8: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3193 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:57.72 -14:40:51.3: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3409 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:44.49 -07:33:16.6: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7587 delta=-0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:36.28 -07:55:57.7: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7274 delta=-0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:14:07.04 -06:55:57.6: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9029 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:01.73 -08:50:01.0:  15.24 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:59:45.79 -05:52:34.6:  12.57 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:01.73 -08:50:01.0:  15.26 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:59:45.79 -05:52:34.6:  12.52 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.54 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:59:45.79 -05:52:34.6: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6114 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:48:06.67 -07:36:48.6:  12.87 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:05.47 -09:56:45.9:  15.49 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:51:01.61 -05:38:20.6:  12.82 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:48.93 -06:31:08.5:  13.27 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:48:06.67 -07:36:48.6:  13.05 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.94 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:06.67 -07:36:48.6: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3111 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:05.47 -09:56:45.9:  15.53 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:51:01.61 -05:38:20.6:  13.00 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:51:01.61 -05:38:20.6: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4172 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:44:45.00 -06:55:22.9:  13.46 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:48.93 -06:31:08.5:  13.23 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:48.93 -06:31:08.5: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4339 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:44:45.00 -06:55:22.9:  13.51 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.49 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:44:45.00 -06:55:22.9: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6689 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:57:47.09 -05:28:12.6:  12.79 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:35.79 -05:29:08.3:  14.26 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:57:47.09 -05:28:12.6:  13.15 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:57:47.09 -05:28:12.6: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8947 delta=-0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:39:20.55 -05:47:42.0:  14.45 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:54:19.58 -04:55:21.8:  14.87 +/- 0.24  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:37:06.81 -09:22:38.4:  14.74 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:35.79 -05:29:08.3:  14.68 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.41 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:15:44.51 -07:14:09.4:  14.39 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:35.79 -05:29:08.3: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3033 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:36:15.66 -06:51:53.5:  14.56 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:39:20.55 -05:47:42.0:  14.40 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:35:18.90 -07:08:32.6:  14.42 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.43 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:20.55 -05:47:42.0: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3224 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:54:19.58 -04:55:21.8:  14.72 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.78 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:19.58 -04:55:21.8: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.3594 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:37:06.81 -09:22:38.4:  14.37 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.49 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:06.81 -09:22:38.4: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2315 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:32:52.47 -06:42:23.3:  14.61 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:15:44.51 -07:14:09.4:  14.38 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:36:15.66 -06:51:53.5:  14.65 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.39 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:44.51 -07:14:09.4: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3135 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.61 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:15.66 -06:51:53.5: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3456 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:35:18.90 -07:08:32.6:  14.29 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.34 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:18.90 -07:08:32.6: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4282 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:32:52.47 -06:42:23.3:  14.43 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.50 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:52.47 -06:42:23.3: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3831 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:34:45.66 -06:57:58.1:  14.55 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:36.12 -10:20:04.4:  13.93 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:47:28.93 -06:25:32.0:  14.94 +/- 0.24  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:30:06.65 -08:21:05.5:  14.56 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:34:45.66 -06:57:58.1:  14.50 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.52 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:45.66 -06:57:58.1: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3925 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:36.12 -10:20:04.4:  13.96 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:00:47.32 -09:01:10.7:  13.71 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.95 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:36.12 -10:20:04.4: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1663 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:47:28.93 -06:25:32.0:  14.54 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.66 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:47:28.93 -06:25:32.0: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4196 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:30:06.65 -08:21:05.5:  14.23 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.35 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:06.65 -08:21:05.5: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4523 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:00:47.32 -09:01:10.7:  13.85 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.77 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:47.32 -09:01:10.7: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1348 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32486.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32656.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 31s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32357_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32357_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    14.18    23:54:45.74 -08:55:58.2   5603 2570   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.17    23:54:45.82 -08:55:57.3   5600 2569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32359_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32359_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    14.27    00:13:02.63 -05:59:51.6   2942 0687   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.24    00:13:02.59 -05:59:52.2   2939 0686   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32361_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32361_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    14.17    00:08:45.32 -06:28:01.5   3577 0996   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.39    00:08:45.39 -06:28:03.0   3574 0995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32363_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32363_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    13.60    00:26:57.71 -14:40:52.0   0713 5895   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.22    00:26:57.73 -14:40:50.5   0710 5894   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32365_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32365_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    13.78    23:39:44.53 -07:33:15.5   7892 1851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.74    23:39:44.44 -07:33:17.8   7890 1850   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32367_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32367_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    13.41    23:57:51.39 -07:49:35.2   5173 1884   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.44    23:57:51.39 -07:49:34.5   5170 1883   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32368_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32368_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    13.28    23:54:35.17 -07:43:44.5   5663 1847   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.36    23:54:35.23 -07:43:45.1   5660 1846   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32370_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32370_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    13.07    23:45:51.96 -10:20:17.5   6882 3482   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.16    23:45:52.08 -10:20:18.1   6879 3480   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32372_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32372_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    12.89    00:14:06.98 -06:55:57.9   2763 1248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.92    00:14:07.09 -06:55:57.3   2760 1246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32373_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32373_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    12.73    23:43:36.28 -07:55:57.4   7298 2050   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.73    23:43:36.28 -07:55:58.0   7296 2048   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32395_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32395_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    10.30    00:19:24.42 -08:51:12.2   1931 2381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

**** FOUND  00:19:24.42 -08:51:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32403_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32403_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    10.60    00:31:14.75 -10:21:07.2   0124 3246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32404_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32404_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    10.52    00:27:33.11 -13:23:34.8   0641 5106   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32411_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32411_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    10.91    00:04:54.64 -11:23:52.1   4035 3987   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32437_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32437_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    11.68    00:19:01.67 -06:34:33.7   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32443_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32443_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    11.75    00:03:57.04 -07:49:03.5   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32447_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32447_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    11.73    23:35:57.61 -10:48:37.1   8340 3851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32467_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32467_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    11.92    00:11:12.61 -12:25:56.8   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32468_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32468_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.07    00:29:18.69 -05:13:01.9   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32482_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32482_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.23    23:54:11.02 -07:29:45.1   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32486_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
Preparing report for the candidate 32486_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32493_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32493_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.35    23:58:54.43 -05:40:50.8   5070 0580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32496_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32496_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.38    23:37:55.35 -06:54:47.4   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32499_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32499_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.47    23:35:13.72 -07:17:26.5   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32519_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32519_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.60    23:32:04.41 -05:53:39.8   9118 0903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32525_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32525_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.60    00:05:10.80 -05:41:48.1   4128 0550   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

**** FOUND  00:05:10.81 -05:41:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32527_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32527_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    12.60    23:59:45.81 -05:52:34.1   4939 0694   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.62    23:59:45.77 -05:52:35.0   4936 0693   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32532_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32532_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.40    23:50:01.99 -12:15:18.0   6203 4602   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32536_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32536_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.76    23:56:01.06 -05:06:09.2   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32539_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32539_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.64    00:03:47.68 -06:52:02.9   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32549_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32549_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.61    00:25:57.43 -09:06:23.5   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32555_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32555_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.46    00:06:14.18 -13:03:44.3   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32557_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32557_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.66    23:55:36.98 -13:40:53.1   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32563_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32563_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.80    00:00:50.85 -04:55:43.1   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32568_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32568_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.96    00:10:28.08 -06:02:08.7   3326 0724   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

**** FOUND  00:10:28.10 -06:02:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32570_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32570_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.01    23:45:06.12 -06:02:59.5   7134 0898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32584_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32584_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.65    00:30:12.52 -12:50:19.3   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32587_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32587_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.17    00:01:09.69 -15:06:05.9   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32595_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32595_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.15    00:25:42.31 -05:19:11.3   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32597_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32597_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.94    23:30:51.56 -10:08:29.9   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32598_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32598_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.90    00:04:47.61 -12:58:11.9   4015 4935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32606_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32606_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.91    00:29:38.72 -12:22:10.2   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32619_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32619_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.08    23:42:21.80 -10:00:53.0   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32637_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32637_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.11    00:06:55.77 -11:55:51.6   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32638_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32638_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.28    00:22:51.98 -09:35:35.7   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32641_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32641_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.08    00:21:01.49 -06:37:45.9   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32642_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32642_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.00    00:26:36.46 -13:56:26.4   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32644_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32644_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.00    00:25:13.38 -08:18:25.8   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32646_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32646_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.97    00:27:13.64 -10:22:24.1   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32649_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32649_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    12.86    00:30:48.14 -12:01:19.9   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32654_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32654_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    13.31    23:48:06.66 -07:36:48.5   6634 1823   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.31    23:48:06.69 -07:36:48.7   6631 1822   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32656_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
Preparing report for the candidate 32656_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32672_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32672_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    13.42    23:51:01.63 -05:38:20.2   6258 0608   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.42    23:51:01.59 -05:38:20.9   6255 0607   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32678_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32678_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.09    23:56:11.87 -13:55:51.6   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32680_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32680_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.43    23:42:45.72 -07:05:33.2   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32681_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32681_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.20    23:31:04.97 -14:25:49.4   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32684_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32684_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.43    23:31:11.41 -08:11:42.9   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32685_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32685_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.38    00:24:54.64 -08:41:14.9   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32688_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32688_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.44    00:31:02.08 -07:24:37.2   0189 1455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32689_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32689_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    13.45    23:52:48.93 -06:31:08.9   5963 1129   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.42    23:52:48.93 -06:31:08.1   5960 1128   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32701_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32701_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.41    23:38:05.69 -10:46:12.4   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32707_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32707_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.22    00:30:19.79 -08:33:44.8   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32716_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32716_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.37    00:11:20.87 -06:03:57.2   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32726_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32726_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.59    23:34:03.84 -06:12:56.9   8801 1083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32727_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32727_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    13.60    23:44:45.03 -06:55:24.5   7160 1431   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.76    23:44:44.97 -06:55:21.2   7158 1429   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32728_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32728_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.39    23:38:35.95 -12:59:04.5   7869 5142   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32731_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32731_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.37    00:10:26.43 -14:10:19.2   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32732_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32732_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.50    23:30:56.66 -11:08:31.1   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32743_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32743_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.70    23:38:42.60 -07:19:04.0   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32746_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32746_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.73    23:31:05.00 -09:53:22.7   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32748_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32748_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.40    00:29:41.60 -11:11:06.2   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32765_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32765_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.74    23:55:05.22 -07:23:35.7   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32766_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32766_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.56    23:36:57.30 -11:32:00.3   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32769_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32769_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.13    00:04:22.21 -14:33:26.4   4039 5898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32786_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32786_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.48    23:52:08.81 -12:41:39.5   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32789_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32789_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.71    23:54:58.49 -05:08:02.8   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32790_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32790_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.75    23:42:52.78 -07:28:45.4   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32791_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32791_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.39    00:30:47.08 -10:26:13.1   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32796_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32796_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.36    23:35:49.00 -14:04:57.4   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32797_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32797_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.84    23:31:33.77 -07:58:42.3   9112 2176   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32798_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32798_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    13.86    23:57:47.06 -05:28:13.0   5247 0461   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.93    23:57:47.11 -05:28:12.1   5244 0459   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32802_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32802_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.82    00:26:33.01 -07:08:13.4   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32803_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32803_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.97    00:16:44.63 -11:54:20.9   2275 4236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32805_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32805_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.61    00:19:53.82 -05:24:19.8   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32823_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32823_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.84    23:37:17.28 -06:26:13.0   8302 1192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32832_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32832_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.68    23:29:27.42 -14:13:05.0   9185 5990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32837_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32837_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.91    23:57:58.56 -07:36:32.8   5158 1751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32848_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32848_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.15    00:30:22.56 -07:11:41.4   0292 1326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32851_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32851_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.94    00:27:37.88 -07:14:07.4   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32854_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32854_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.04    23:40:58.79 -07:21:44.1   7710 1724   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32862_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32862_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.89    23:48:54.86 -08:08:57.8   6494 2139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32866_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32866_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.11    23:36:08.20 -06:16:32.4   8483 1103   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32868_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32868_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    14.17    23:31:35.83 -05:29:08.3   9210 0658   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.57    23:31:35.75 -05:29:08.4   9208 0657   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32872_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32872_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.03    23:46:39.12 -09:01:27.9   6804 2683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32873_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32873_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.06    00:18:43.12 -09:46:29.0   2019 2941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32879_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32879_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    14.20    23:39:20.54 -05:47:42.9   8017 0787   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.53    23:39:20.56 -05:47:41.1   8014 0786   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32880_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32880_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.10    00:06:15.58 -09:09:57.3   3887 2637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32881_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32881_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.90    00:27:36.28 -14:05:56.7   0623 5537   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32885_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32885_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    14.26    23:54:19.63 -04:55:21.0   5782 0151   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.56    23:54:19.53 -04:55:22.5   5780 0150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32890_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32890_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.09    23:37:02.56 -11:00:08.3   8171 3957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32901_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32901_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    14.22    23:37:06.79 -09:22:39.1   8222 2976   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.24    23:37:06.84 -09:22:37.8   8219 2974   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32902_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32902_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.96    23:49:16.73 -12:17:36.0   6313 4631   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32903_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32903_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    13.69    23:28:17.79 -14:21:44.7   9353 6092   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32904_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32904_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    14.22    00:15:44.53 -07:14:08.5   2513 1422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.46    00:15:44.49 -07:14:10.2   2510 1421   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32906_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32906_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    14.32    23:36:15.67 -06:51:53.2   8444 1461   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.38    23:36:15.65 -06:51:53.7   8442 1460   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32917_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32917_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    14.32    23:35:18.88 -07:08:32.4   8577 1638   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.66    23:35:18.92 -07:08:32.7   8575 1636   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32919_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32919_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    14.39    23:32:52.46 -06:42:23.1   8966 1393   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.38    23:32:52.48 -06:42:23.6   8963 1392   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32923_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32923_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    14.36    23:34:45.74 -06:57:58.6   8668 1535   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.44    23:34:45.57 -06:57:57.6   8666 1534   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32924_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32924_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    14.21    23:31:36.12 -10:20:04.7   9016 3606   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.13    23:31:36.11 -10:20:04.2   9013 3605   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32926_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32926_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    14.33    23:47:28.91 -06:25:31.7   6766 1110   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.54    23:47:28.96 -06:25:32.3   6763 1109   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32930_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32930_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    14.36    23:30:06.65 -08:21:06.2   9321 2417   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.66    23:30:06.65 -08:21:04.9   9318 2416   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32933_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32933_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.19361    2461341.69361    14.25    00:00:47.33 -09:01:10.8   4705 2583   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-38-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0228.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.05    00:00:47.30 -09:01:10.5   4703 2582   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32960_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32960_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.08    00:19:11.30 -14:11:40.7   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32969_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32969_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.29    23:37:43.34 -11:10:41.3   8063 4057   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32998_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 32998_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.09    00:09:28.70 -10:55:07.1   3371 3674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33007_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 33007_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    14.22    00:21:16.48 -14:23:16.0   1559 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05387_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 05387_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    10.79    23:52:12.38 -12:54:32.6   5864 4980   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01200_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229
The candidate 01200_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 28.19412    2461341.69412    8.96    00:02:07.40 -14:40:33.3   4364 5983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_234019_TTUQ1b1x1_968522_wxxEG0su/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_23-39-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0229.fits

**** FOUND  00:02:07.41 -14:40:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 34s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:33:01.73 -08:50:01.0
23:52:05.47 -09:56:45.9
########### Completed Cet-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
23:33:01.73 -08:50:01.0
23:52:05.47 -09:56:45.9
###################################################################################
23:33:01.73 -08:50:01.0  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
23:52:05.47 -09:56:45.9  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461341.69360645 -observatory V36
15:05:25.96 -19:59:31.7 Mercury (1.2mag)
13:35:14.89 -16:05:22.4 Venus (-4.3mag)
09:16:57.32 +17:23:53.6 Mars (0.9mag)
09:44:05.98 +14:20:04.9 Jupiter (-2.0mag)
00:37:53.33 +01:09:07.4 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:09:58.18 +20:52:33.6 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:08:49.16 -00:35:16.7 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:17.40 -23:42:25.3 Pluto (14.5mag)
03:57:40.73 +25:08:56.9 Moon (-12.0mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 27 23:44 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461341.69360645:
09:44:12.61 +14:19:27.6 Io (6.0mag)
09:43:59.86 +14:20:38.9 Europa (6.1mag)
09:44:06.10 +14:20:05.1 Ganymede (5.5mag)
09:43:40.78 +14:22:26.1 Callisto (6.8mag)
09:45:06.23 +14:33:25.1 Himalia (15.5mag)
09:44:03.12 +14:20:20.8 Thebe (16.4mag)
09:43:31.14 +14:44:36.6 Elara (17.4mag)
09:45:21.29 +13:45:43.3 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
09:41:32.07 +14:50:54.8 Carme (18.7mag)
00:37:39.17 +01:09:12.9 Titan (8.2mag)
00:37:54.86 +01:08:49.4 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:38:09.97 +01:08:26.7 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:37:46.96 +01:09:26.5 Hyperion (14.2mag)
00:36:07.11 +00:56:47.1 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 27 23:44 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461341.69360645:
04:14:57.40 +18:50:26.2 JWST
18:42:36.44 +11:40:13.3 Chandra
06:11:20.73 +23:48:49.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 27 23:44 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461341.69360645 -observatory V36
03:38:01.34 +20:04:34.6 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
07:44:22.91 +37:57:07.9 17.9mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill)
07:44:28.06 +37:56:55.1 17.9mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill)
07:43:47.83 +37:57:11.4 17.9mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill)
05:02:50.46 +40:05:23.4 17.8mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski)
18:41:15.48 -33:03:38.8 14.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:44:37.19 -73:30:24.5 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:13:00.91 +35:08:07.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:28:33.98 +47:37:28.8 17.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
07:34:55.13 +25:20:54.2 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:07:41.38 +37:40:16.8 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:33:14.11 +40:57:54.4 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:44:47.53 -13:38:39.0 16.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:49:35.20 +14:38:40.2 15.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
14:08:30.82 -04:05:52.9 16.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
19:50:51.95 +56:57:07.6 15.4mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
13:01:43.70 +16:09:25.4 17.7mag A/2026 E1
16:14:18.81 -60:22:19.0 14.0mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
19:28:10.50 -05:15:25.4 16.8mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS)
23:44:00.86 +15:38:22.0 17.0mag 2P/Encke
23:18:09.09 -27:30:12.5 15.2mag 10P/Tempel
02:32:37.62 +33:36:38.4 16.4mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:22:14.96 -09:31:59.8 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:13:09.38 -09:05:26.4 15.8mag 65P/Gunn
07:54:54.67 +14:13:16.0 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
02:41:32.52 +13:24:36.2 18.0mag 88P/Howell
08:38:55.90 +44:33:54.8 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
09:39:06.56 +07:57:05.2 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
12:14:47.06 +09:26:11.0 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
20:06:06.86 +12:33:57.6 10.0mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:58:46.00 -01:57:24.1 15.7mag 169P/NEAT
03:16:34.32 +02:42:03.7 15.1mag 220P/McNaught
06:20:52.41 +48:38:57.5 15.6mag 260P/McNaught
07:49:42.55 +25:12:05.5 17.6mag 266P/Christensen
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct 27 23:44 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70  TCP J17541876-2736362  2026-10-24.76 9.92
10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00  SN2026sqf  2026-10-24.6 13.27
21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90  ASASSN-26fq  2026-10-23.23 14.82
01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90  ASASSN-26fp  2026-10-23.34 12.9
01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10  ASASSN-26fo  2026-10-19.79 -4.88
00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10  SN2026afqd  2026-10-19.36 -0.77
22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60  ASASSN-26fm  2026-10-13.75 14.42
01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30  SN 2026aedl  2026-10-12.33 15.3
18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00  ASASSN-26fn  2026-10-11.74 15.23
21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30  SN2026acyb  2026-10-9.85 16.83
03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70  SN2026acvp  2026-10-9.95 17.75
04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20  SN2026adhl  2026-10-9.94 17.52
09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40  SN2026aeif  2026-10-9.47 15.93
02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90  ASASSN-26fl  2026-10-7.9 -0.85
02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00  SN 2026adfy  2026-10-4.88 16.61
22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70  AT2026adgn  2026-10-4.28 -2.56
15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40  ASASSN-26fj  2026-10-2.06 15.91
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90  ASASSN-26fi  2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20  ASASSN-26fh  2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90  AT2026adfv  2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50  SN2026abhc  2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80  SN2026acxa  2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40  ASASSN-26fg  2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40  SN2026aajs  2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70  AT2026acgs  2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90  ASASSN-26ff  2026-09-16.38 15.41
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20  SN2026yjv  2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30  SN 2026aafh  2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00  SN 2026aaks  2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20  SN2026aasi  2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80  SN2026aafk  2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60  SN2026aafs  2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50  SN2026aagh   -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10  ASASSN-26fe  2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30  SN2026aars  2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50  SN 2026znh  2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80  ASASSN-26fd  2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70  ASASSN-26fc  2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70  SN 2026zfw  2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10  SN2026aacj  2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10  SN2026zji  2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00  SN2026aaiv  2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60  ASASSN-26fb  2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50  AT2026aabo  2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60  SN 2026zhl  2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70  ASASSN-26fa  2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30  AT2026zwp  2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80  V488  2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10  V8055  2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10  ASASSN-26ez  2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00  AT2026zwo  2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90  AT2026zjy  2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50  SN2026ymb  2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30  SN2026yid  2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60  ASASSN-26ey  2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80  ASASSN-26ex  2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.89 -10:37:05.90  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.05 15.79
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 27 23:44 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3  PNV J00425465+4122593  2026-08-25.4712  18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76  PNV J00425038+4118587  2026-09-04.1512  18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4  PNV J00421276+4116284  2026-09-10.9176  18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7  TCP J17520680-2343207  2026-09-08.7896  12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1  PNV J00424094+4115371  2026-09-17.8925  18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8  TCP J08492013-0919158  2026-09-18.4698  13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6  PNV J00421393+4116356  2026-09-22.6597  19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5  TCP J18140158+1513555  2026-09-24.4645  14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5  TCP J00423661+4113505  2026-09-29.7462  17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8  TCP J22034629-1107578  2026-09-29.7438  14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2  TCP J22050206+2049012  2026-10-03.5715  17.13Cmag
00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2  TCP J00381501+4114472  2026-10-08.5978  17.72Cmag
01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4  TCP J01060583+0951204  2026-10-10.8543  14.54Cmag
17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2  TCP J17541876-2736362  2026-10-12.3993  10.8mag
09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2  PNV J09560079+6906152  2026-10-14.9274  19.38Cmag
00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3  PNV J00433083+4126553  2026-10-17.5651  18.61Cmag
04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6  TCP J04573208+3015416  2026-10-17.7818  18.21Cmag
05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3  TCP J05210764+2338213  2026-10-18.4020  10.3mag
05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5  TCP J05341101+2845305  2026-10-18.3604  16.6mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 27 23:44 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
10:32:09.821 +11:37:46.17  AT 2026aetj  2026-10-01.53 18.5059
16:11:43.883 +20:59:33.48  AT 2026aeti  2026-10-03.14 19.2268
19:55:55.462 +58:10:08.22  AT 2026aeth  2026-10-02.16 20.7283
14:55:19.146 +37:33:21.65  AT 2026aetg  2026-10-02.14 17.2445
14:51:59.504 +47:04:29.76  AT 2026aetf  2026-10-02.14 19.1738
06:50:36.388 +58:36:08.80  SN 2026aete  2026-10-07.53 19.306
09:20:29.340 +55:06:35.79  SN 2026aetd  2026-10-07.54 17.677
08:26:28.724 +38:08:57.54  AT 2026aetc  2026-10-02.47 19.3657
06:41:51.189 +21:53:58.11  SN 2026aetb  2026-10-07.46 19.5374
08:34:43.981 +46:14:33.95  AT 2026aeta  2026-10-02.51 19.5454
09:00:29.362 -03:20:55.67  AT 2026aesz  2026-10-03.53 19.6849
08:06:22.231 +46:59:03.50  AT 2026aesy  2026-10-01.51 19.6229
07:51:57.166 +45:05:58.19  AT 2026aesx  2026-10-01.41 19.6203
08:06:59.965 +46:08:20.08  AT 2026aesw  2026-10-01.41 19.7007
09:54:13.819 +04:50:26.21  AT 2026aesv  2026-10-01.53 19.1617
10:03:36.908 -05:05:53.11  AT 2026aesu  2026-10-01.53 17.8861
10:00:58.300 +04:55:31.23  AT 2026aest  2026-10-07.53 19.3128
04:23:19.588 -47:59:25.70  AT 2026aess  2026-02-23.11 23.4645
08:59:18.240 +10:57:46.23  AT 2026aesr  2026-10-05.52 19.89
19:23:47.930 -12:36:03.40  AT 2026aesq  2026-10-06.12 18.38
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 27 23:44 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Tue Oct 27 23:41:22 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 27s (0.45 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 6s (0.10 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 41s (0.68 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 6 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 9s (0.15 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 0s (0.00 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 8s (0.13 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 2s (0.03 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 3s (0.05 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 1s (0.02 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 34s (0.57 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 55s (0.92 min)
FIELD_Cet-05-Q1b1x1: 110s (1.83 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 287s (4.78 min)
Finished: Tue Oct 27 23:46:09 CDT 2026