FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461199.75768347 08.06.2026 06:10:53.852   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
First image: 2461199.75768347 08.06.2026 06:10:53.852   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Last  image: 2461341.58605064 28.10.2026 02:03:44.775   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  6197
Objects passed selection criteria:  6171
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.7    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.7    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 4391
Average stars matched: 4293.25 (97.7739 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   232696 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Oct 27 21:12:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461199.75768347 08.06.2026 06:10:53.852   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
First image: 2461199.75768347 08.06.2026 06:10:53.852   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Last  image: 2461341.58605064 28.10.2026 02:03:44.775   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 95
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -6.96
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  31475
Objects passed selection criteria:  31372
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.9    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.9    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 24136.5
Average stars matched: 23477 (97.2676 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   255080 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Oct 27 21:13:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=esa_tap (lib/gaia_dr2_cone_search.sh -> ESA Gaia Archive TAP service)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 403908 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 403908 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits_preview.png'

UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits


renamed 'UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits_preview.png'

UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 440.9575
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 445.9569
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3606.2135
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 813.5597
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3633.8071
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 820.1299
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 8.17814
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.008
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 16.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-27T21:02:53.4778724' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-28T02:02:53.4778724' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =      61341.085341169 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-28T02:03:03.3790868' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61341.0854557753 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     205.713837321796 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =      61.999552540187 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     17.3163888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     334.499444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     3.32558971444083 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 42 51'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29522 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29522 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 14.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 88.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               902.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 16.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 11.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             6.800544 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits :)

Spent 0.678974 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 16.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-27T21:03:44.7752733' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-28T02:03:44.7752733' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =      61341.085934896 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-28T02:03:54.6766462' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61341.0860494906 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     205.713837306178 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     61.9995526058643 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     17.2386111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     334.569444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     3.33980195443097 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 42 51'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29522 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29522 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 14.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 88.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               902.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 16.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 11.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             6.800544 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits :)

Spent 0.863328 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits



fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461341.58545691
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Image size: 942.2'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:39.844 +62:00:36.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:42:39.844 +62:00:36.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0161 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Image size: 942.2'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:42.099 +62:00:37.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:42:42.099 +62:00:37.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0118 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  13:42:39.844 +62:00:36.75
Second-epoch second image center 13:42:42.099 +62:00:37.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00442 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9HFSd9uIxX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ccV49DMOcJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Hp8Yhw67mk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gNgz9WU0xe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2617 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2617 deg
Loaded 6074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3959 out of 4068 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4068 out of 6503 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.660400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.660400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.43

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.43

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2617 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2617 deg
Loaded 6074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3959 out of 4068 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4068 out of 6503 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 6522 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6066 to 224.9768 deg, Dec +55.8887 to +67.2580 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6066 to 224.9768 deg, Dec 55.8887 to 67.2580 deg
Loaded 6076 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3951 out of 4074 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4074 out of 6522 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.4 pix  UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
 2.4 pix  UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.4 mag.  UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
 15.4 mag.  UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
 14.1 mag.  fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
 14.1 mag.  fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.1 (SNR )  11.0 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.9HFSd9uIxX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=380, bad_region=0, passed=6503
Got 6503 stars (including 6118 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=1271 n_q2=1283 n_q3=1175 n_q4=1153 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.153
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4882 N_valid=4882 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.011 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.301 p95_sep_arcsec=1.076 n_q1=1271 n_q2=1283 n_q3=1175 n_q4=1153 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ccV49DMOcJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=400, bad_region=0, passed=6522
Got 6522 stars (including 6118 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6522 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.364 n_q1=1276 n_q2=1286 n_q3=1172 n_q4=1150 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4884 N_valid=4884 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.010 bias_dec_arcsec=0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.303 p95_sep_arcsec=1.115 n_q1=1276 n_q2=1286 n_q3=1172 n_q4=1150 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Hp8Yhw67mk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=203, bad_region=0, passed=2325
Got 2325 stars (including 2119 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2325 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2057 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2056 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2056 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2059 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2057 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2057 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 2057 stars left (next iteration limit 2261)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2057 robust_rms=12.687 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.911 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.911 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2057 robust_rms=0.547 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.747 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.747 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2057 robust_rms=0.433 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.547 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.506 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2057 robust_rms_before=1.034 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.369 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.433 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.486 worst_region_rms_after=0.547 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.161 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.506
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.486 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.486 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.369 arcsec matched=2057
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits N_match=2057 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.483 n_q1=590 n_q2=466 n_q3=552 n_q4=449 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.318
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2057 N_valid=2057 bias_ra_arcsec=0.549 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.863 p95_sep_arcsec=2.116 n_q1=590 n_q2=466 n_q3=552 n_q4=449 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.gNgz9WU0xe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=210, bad_region=0, passed=2325
Got 2325 stars (including 2109 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2325 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2046 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2045 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2045 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2045 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2048 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2046 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2046 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 2046 stars left (next iteration limit 2249)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2046 robust_rms=12.685 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.960 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.960 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2046 robust_rms=0.567 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.772 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.772 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2046 robust_rms=0.430 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.540 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.479 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2046 robust_rms_before=1.088 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.364 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.430 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.489 worst_region_rms_after=0.540 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.186 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.479
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.489 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.489 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.364 arcsec matched=2046
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits N_match=2046 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.497 n_q1=583 n_q2=478 n_q3=546 n_q4=439 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.344
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2046 N_valid=2046 bias_ra_arcsec=0.572 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.032 median_sep_arcsec=0.883 p95_sep_arcsec=2.141 n_q1=583 n_q2=478 n_q3=546 n_q4=439 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.153
ref2=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.123
new1=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.318
new2=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.344
reference average sigma_overall=0.3795 worst_q_ratio=1.138
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179_astrometric_residuals.png (4882 matched stars from wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180_astrometric_residuals.png (4884 matched stars from wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078_astrometric_residuals.png (2057 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079_astrometric_residuals.png (2046 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Image size: 942.2'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:39.844 +62:00:36.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:42:39.844 +62:00:36.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0161 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Image size: 942.2'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:42.099 +62:00:37.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:42:42.099 +62:00:37.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0118 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  13:42:39.844 +62:00:36.75
Second-epoch second image center 13:42:42.099 +62:00:37.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00442 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3GakNuEPub
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2jd2QUwKBj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WdICDEAdFP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6WLGBgtZrx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 33815 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2697 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2697 deg
Loaded 6170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3809 out of 4122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4122 out of 33815 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.540000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.540000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -6.96
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.58

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.58

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 33815 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2697 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2697 deg
Loaded 6170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3809 out of 4122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4122 out of 33815 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 33636 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3037 to 225.2618 deg, Dec +55.8888 to +67.2587 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3037 to 225.2618 deg, Dec 55.8888 to 67.2587 deg
Loaded 6169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3802 out of 4121 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4121 out of 33636 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 85 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
 2.2 pix  UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.6 mag.  UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
 15.6 mag.  UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
 14.3 mag.  fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
 14.3 mag.  fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.3 (SNR )  13.5 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3GakNuEPub (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1409, bad_region=1, passed=33795
Got 33795 stars (including 32344 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33795 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=1267 n_q2=1311 n_q3=1124 n_q4=1178 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.076
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4880 N_valid=4880 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.024 bias_dec_arcsec=0.012 median_sep_arcsec=0.296 p95_sep_arcsec=1.081 n_q1=1267 n_q2=1311 n_q3=1124 n_q4=1178 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2jd2QUwKBj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=1410, bad_region=0, passed=33603
Got 33603 stars (including 32157 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33603 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33603 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33603 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33603 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=1271 n_q2=1315 n_q3=1126 n_q4=1168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4880 N_valid=4880 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.020 bias_dec_arcsec=0.015 median_sep_arcsec=0.300 p95_sep_arcsec=1.125 n_q1=1271 n_q2=1315 n_q3=1126 n_q4=1168 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WdICDEAdFP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=376, bad_region=14, passed=14958
Got 14958 stars (including 14539 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14958 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Excluding outliers - 4862 stars left (next iteration limit 5348)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4862 robust_rms=12.156 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.481 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.481 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4862 robust_rms=0.593 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.789 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.789 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4862 robust_rms=0.475 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.654 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.547 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4862 robust_rms_before=1.088 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.401 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.475 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.500 worst_region_rms_after=0.654 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.233 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.547
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.500 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.500 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.401 arcsec matched=4862
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits N_match=4862 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.513 n_q1=1471 n_q2=1151 n_q3=1302 n_q4=938 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4862 N_valid=4862 bias_ra_arcsec=0.589 bias_dec_arcsec=0.020 median_sep_arcsec=0.905 p95_sep_arcsec=2.122 n_q1=1471 n_q2=1151 n_q3=1302 n_q4=938 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.6WLGBgtZrx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=379, bad_region=14, passed=14916
Got 14916 stars (including 14491 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5346)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=12.145 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.660 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.660 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=0.599 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.778 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.778 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=0.469 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.626 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.523 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4860 robust_rms_before=1.124 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.396 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.469 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.501 worst_region_rms_after=0.626 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.243 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.523
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.501 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.501 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.396 arcsec matched=4860
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.506 n_q1=1463 n_q2=1152 n_q3=1312 n_q4=933 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.308
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4860 N_valid=4860 bias_ra_arcsec=0.610 bias_dec_arcsec=0.016 median_sep_arcsec=0.914 p95_sep_arcsec=2.137 n_q1=1463 n_q2=1152 n_q3=1312 n_q4=933 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:39:22.43 +62:11:30.0:  12.45 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:28:10.45 +66:12:54.4:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:39:22.43 +62:11:30.0:  12.43 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:39:22.43 +62:11:30.0: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5397 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:28:10.45 +66:12:54.4:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:28:10.45 +66:12:54.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:34:13.05 +56:31:09.5:  13.53 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:34:13.05 +56:31:09.5:  13.61 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.57 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:13.05 +56:31:09.5: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5526 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52245_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52245_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.39    13:39:04.44 +65:49:59.1   5111 0902   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

**** FOUND  13:39:04.57 +65:50:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52248_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52248_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.08546    2461341.58546    12.54    12:39:22.52 +62:11:27.2   9238 2720   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.54    12:39:22.34 +62:11:32.8   9241 2718   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52250_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52250_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.87    14:30:48.11 +62:45:37.0   1520 2300   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

**** FOUND  14:30:48.08 +62:45:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52251_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52251_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.78    14:34:36.32 +56:20:13.6   0312 6034   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

**** FOUND  14:34:36.33 +56:20:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52253_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52253_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.24    14:26:57.99 +58:09:02.9   1185 5088   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

**** FOUND  14:26:57.95 +58:09:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52255_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52255_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    11.54    13:55:38.19 +65:26:07.5   4069 1080   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

**** FOUND  13:55:38.20 +65:26:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52277_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52277_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    10.53    14:33:28.22 +57:55:54.1   0641 5106   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52278_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52278_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    10.63    14:46:03.77 +60:40:17.8   0124 3246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52283_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52283_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    10.25    13:27:48.71 +59:03:54.8   5864 4980   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52286_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52286_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    10.54    13:52:27.35 +60:37:16.0   4035 3987   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52306_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52306_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    10.99    12:51:14.36 +64:31:35.4   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52315_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52315_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    11.55    14:04:14.63 +59:29:18.1   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52318_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52318_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    11.77    14:27:41.15 +65:01:54.7   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52321_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52321_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.01    14:54:42.16 +65:44:17.5   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52329_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52329_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    11.74    13:39:54.34 +66:21:43.8   5070 0580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52333_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52333_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    11.69    13:29:12.31 +64:30:16.1   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52334_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52334_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    11.37    12:35:37.19 +65:09:20.3   9118 0903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52342_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52342_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.15    14:15:48.97 +56:40:25.6   1911 6138   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

**** FOUND  14:15:48.89 +56:40:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52352_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52352_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    11.90    13:34:29.50 +58:20:08.2   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52353_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52353_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    11.77    13:23:16.95 +59:40:42.4   6203 4602   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52366_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52366_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.20    13:54:25.40 +58:56:34.1   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52369_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52369_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.54    14:38:03.69 +62:11:58.7   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52374_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52374_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    11.83    12:29:14.76 +66:12:52.7   9367 0177   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52376_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52376_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.39    13:44:47.45 +67:06:59.2   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52379_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52379_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.78    14:32:11.26 +64:52:59.0   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52380_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52380_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.17    13:06:26.55 +65:42:22.4   7134 0898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52392_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52392_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.65    14:39:12.07 +58:19:34.7   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52394_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52394_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.69    14:38:07.52 +63:01:10.2   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52396_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52396_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.83    14:39:01.85 +58:48:53.6   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52400_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52400_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.92    14:45:59.77 +65:53:16.7   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52403_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52403_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.87    14:41:48.90 +59:05:01.7   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52404_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52404_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.60    13:51:43.54 +59:02:59.8   4015 4935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52405_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52405_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.51    13:32:29.14 +66:55:11.1   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52408_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52408_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.08546    2461341.58546    12.21    12:28:10.43 +66:12:54.9   9430 0160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.14    12:28:10.47 +66:12:53.9   9432 0160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52409_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52409_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.91    14:44:42.59 +64:34:16.4   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52413_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52413_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.88    14:30:55.74 +57:26:37.4   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52421_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52421_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.87    14:17:02.45 +59:37:51.2   2126 4351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

**** FOUND  14:17:02.52 +59:37:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52431_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52431_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.15    14:48:15.24 +62:27:24.5   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52432_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52432_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.68    12:40:57.68 +64:58:41.2   8801 1083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52439_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52439_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.78    13:56:14.33 +60:03:52.4   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52442_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52442_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.18    14:38:09.79 +60:53:40.2   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52443_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52443_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.63    13:05:50.07 +61:40:41.6   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52455_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52455_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.01    14:30:48.24 +61:53:14.7   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52457_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52457_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.04    14:36:42.45 +62:39:59.2   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52461_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52461_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.37    14:41:22.01 +59:57:43.8   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52464_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52464_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.17    14:10:15.40 +65:49:19.0   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52474_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52474_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.37    14:44:59.20 +60:37:08.4   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52482_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52482_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.45    12:42:52.74 +60:58:13.9   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52483_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52483_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.37    14:31:56.90 +66:08:18.5   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52490_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52490_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.02    13:02:22.32 +58:35:22.5   7869 5142   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52491_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52491_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.99    13:36:49.75 +59:43:13.7   5175 4584   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

**** FOUND  13:36:49.65 +59:43:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52498_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52498_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.91    13:35:37.55 +58:05:27.1   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52499_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52499_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.74    12:39:37.21 +63:06:38.7   9112 2176   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52501_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52501_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 28.08546    2461341.58546    13.51    14:34:12.86 +56:31:09.5   0369 5932   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-02-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.62    14:34:13.24 +56:31:09.5   0372 5933   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52507_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52507_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.52    14:27:41.09 +59:05:21.2   1253 4519   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

**** FOUND  14:27:41.22 +59:05:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52510_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52510_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.27    14:01:38.94 +57:46:09.9   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52524_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52524_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.97    12:58:17.54 +60:45:01.1   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52528_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52528_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.38    14:13:31.54 +58:29:44.0   2280 5073   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

**** FOUND  14:13:31.66 +58:29:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52530_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52530_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.07    13:17:44.93 +63:44:39.7   6494 2139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52531_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52531_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.85    14:45:39.74 +63:54:48.9   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52533_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52533_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.90    13:02:32.95 +64:34:54.7   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52535_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52535_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.74    14:32:26.22 +57:14:19.7   0623 5537   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52540_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52540_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.95    12:39:20.00 +62:52:36.4   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52544_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52544_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.60    14:43:31.29 +64:04:36.9   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52545_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52545_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.39    13:37:58.31 +64:25:43.5   5158 1751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52548_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52548_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.82    14:51:42.94 +63:46:06.4   0292 1326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52551_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52551_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.47    13:29:51.28 +66:52:31.0   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52560_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52560_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    12.76    12:51:01.06 +56:48:07.1   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52566_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52566_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.23    13:31:14.42 +64:37:09.0   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52567_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52567_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.89    14:40:06.16 +64:33:52.6   1175 1084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52570_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52570_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.86    14:25:48.55 +56:29:33.6   1064 6098   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52573_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52573_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.25    12:53:47.12 +64:10:17.3   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52574_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52574_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.70    14:17:23.94 +57:30:29.5   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52579_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52579_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.69    14:20:06.37 +58:36:37.8   1779 4918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52584_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52584_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.47    12:57:13.61 +59:56:42.6   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52585_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52585_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.49    13:03:24.51 +64:12:17.8   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52586_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52586_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.57    13:12:30.49 +58:10:05.7   7090 5469   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52588_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52588_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.47    13:44:40.69 +56:56:06.1   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52589_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52589_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    14.29    13:56:11.10 +62:50:11.0   3887 2637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52591_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52591_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.42    13:27:35.58 +59:16:43.3   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52593_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52593_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    14.00    14:00:11.11 +64:21:12.0   3714 1701   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03084_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 03084_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    10.48    12:37:46.20 +65:33:19.9   8932 0696   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

**** FOUND  12:37:46.21 +65:33:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08895_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 08895_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    13.39    14:52:34.15 +63:30:54.2   0189 1455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09050_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 09050_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    11.48    12:46:00.62 +64:00:23.0   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08377_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 08377_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 28.08605    2461341.58605    11.91    13:41:12.43 +64:49:44.0   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-27_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_210534_TTUQ1b1x1_3065348_bmELRbTb/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-27_21-03-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461341.58545691 -observatory V36
15:05:39.23 -20:01:44.0 Mercury (1.2mag)
13:35:26.45 -16:08:05.6 Venus (-4.3mag)
09:16:43.57 +17:24:46.1 Mars (0.9mag)
09:44:02.59 +14:20:20.4 Jupiter (-2.0mag)
00:37:54.97 +01:09:16.9 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:09:59.12 +20:52:36.0 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:08:49.71 -00:35:13.3 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:17.26 -23:42:26.1 Pluto (14.5mag)
03:51:21.81 +24:35:45.6 Moon (-12.0mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 27 21:12 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461341.58545691:
09:44:07.82 +14:19:51.1 Io (6.0mag)
09:43:54.99 +14:21:03.0 Europa (6.1mag)
09:44:04.34 +14:20:11.2 Ganymede (5.5mag)
09:43:36.81 +14:22:44.9 Callisto (6.8mag)
09:45:02.37 +14:33:44.3 Himalia (15.5mag)
09:44:02.45 +14:20:21.2 Thebe (16.4mag)
09:43:27.41 +14:44:51.4 Elara (17.4mag)
09:45:18.41 +13:45:56.9 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
09:41:29.13 +14:51:09.0 Carme (18.7mag)
00:37:40.88 +01:09:23.4 Titan (8.2mag)
00:37:55.73 +01:08:59.1 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:38:11.33 +01:08:34.9 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:37:49.13 +01:09:36.1 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:36:08.78 +00:56:56.5 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 27 21:12 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461341.58545691:
04:14:36.84 +18:49:23.1 JWST
18:32:16.58 +18:05:35.5 Chandra
04:21:36.74 +53:09:49.2 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 27 21:12 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461341.58545691 -observatory V36
03:38:05.65 +20:04:40.5 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
07:44:20.17 +37:56:41.4 17.9mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill)
07:44:25.31 +37:56:28.6 17.9mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill)
07:43:45.11 +37:56:44.8 17.9mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill)
05:02:50.70 +40:06:17.1 17.9mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski)
18:41:08.59 -33:03:50.4 14.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:44:36.08 -73:29:58.9 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:13:02.36 +35:07:56.6 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:28:48.05 +47:38:10.6 17.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
07:34:53.97 +25:20:55.1 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:07:39.98 +37:39:24.7 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:33:10.59 +40:58:03.2 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:44:48.96 -13:38:42.0 16.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:49:22.11 +14:39:10.6 15.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
14:08:23.80 -04:05:21.8 16.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
19:50:26.73 +57:00:58.1 15.4mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
13:01:37.48 +16:08:36.2 17.7mag A/2026 E1
16:14:31.25 -60:15:39.1 14.0mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
19:28:04.64 -05:15:16.9 16.8mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS)
23:44:17.54 +15:39:57.0 17.0mag 2P/Encke
23:18:01.37 -27:31:58.1 15.2mag 10P/Tempel
02:32:30.27 +33:39:25.3 16.4mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:22:10.78 -09:31:28.3 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:13:12.38 -09:05:28.0 15.8mag 65P/Gunn
07:54:48.48 +14:13:56.1 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
02:41:40.09 +13:24:58.7 18.0mag 88P/Howell
08:38:33.24 +44:32:23.3 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
09:38:53.39 +07:59:31.9 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
12:14:34.21 +09:27:38.7 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
20:06:28.50 +12:31:46.5 10.0mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:58:31.22 -01:56:09.0 15.7mag 169P/NEAT
03:16:40.41 +02:42:39.7 15.1mag 220P/McNaught
06:20:48.91 +48:37:40.9 15.6mag 260P/McNaught
07:49:34.91 +25:12:13.4 17.7mag 266P/Christensen
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.7K Oct 27 21:12 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70  TCP J17541876-2736362  2026-10-24.76 9.92
10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00  SN2026sqf  2026-10-24.6 13.27
21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90  ASASSN-26fq  2026-10-23.23 14.82
01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90  ASASSN-26fp  2026-10-23.34 12.9
01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10  ASASSN-26fo  2026-10-19.79 -4.88
00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10  SN2026afqd  2026-10-19.36 -0.77
22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60  ASASSN-26fm  2026-10-13.75 14.42
01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30  SN 2026aedl  2026-10-12.33 15.3
18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00  ASASSN-26fn  2026-10-11.74 15.23
21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30  SN2026acyb  2026-10-9.85 16.83
03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70  SN2026acvp  2026-10-9.95 17.75
04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20  SN2026adhl  2026-10-9.94 17.52
09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40  SN2026aeif  2026-10-9.47 15.93
02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90  ASASSN-26fl  2026-10-7.9 -0.85
02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00  SN 2026adfy  2026-10-4.88 16.61
22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70  AT2026adgn  2026-10-4.28 -2.56
15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40  ASASSN-26fj  2026-10-2.06 15.91
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90  ASASSN-26fi  2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20  ASASSN-26fh  2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90  AT2026adfv  2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50  SN2026abhc  2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80  SN2026acxa  2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40  ASASSN-26fg  2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40  SN2026aajs  2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70  AT2026acgs  2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90  ASASSN-26ff  2026-09-16.38 15.41
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20  SN2026yjv  2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30  SN 2026aafh  2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00  SN 2026aaks  2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20  SN2026aasi  2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80  SN2026aafk  2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60  SN2026aafs  2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50  SN2026aagh   -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10  ASASSN-26fe  2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30  SN2026aars  2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50  SN 2026znh  2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80  ASASSN-26fd  2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70  ASASSN-26fc  2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70  SN 2026zfw  2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10  SN2026aacj  2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10  SN2026zji  2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00  SN2026aaiv  2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60  ASASSN-26fb  2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50  AT2026aabo  2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60  SN 2026zhl  2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70  ASASSN-26fa  2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30  AT2026zwp  2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80  V488  2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10  V8055  2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10  ASASSN-26ez  2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00  AT2026zwo  2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90  AT2026zjy  2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50  SN2026ymb  2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30  SN2026yid  2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60  ASASSN-26ey  2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80  ASASSN-26ex  2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.89 -10:37:05.90  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.05 15.79
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 27 21:12 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3  PNV J00425465+4122593  2026-08-25.4712  18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76  PNV J00425038+4118587  2026-09-04.1512  18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4  PNV J00421276+4116284  2026-09-10.9176  18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7  TCP J17520680-2343207  2026-09-08.7896  12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1  PNV J00424094+4115371  2026-09-17.8925  18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8  TCP J08492013-0919158  2026-09-18.4698  13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6  PNV J00421393+4116356  2026-09-22.6597  19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5  TCP J18140158+1513555  2026-09-24.4645  14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5  TCP J00423661+4113505  2026-09-29.7462  17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8  TCP J22034629-1107578  2026-09-29.7438  14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2  TCP J22050206+2049012  2026-10-03.5715  17.13Cmag
00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2  TCP J00381501+4114472  2026-10-08.5978  17.72Cmag
01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4  TCP J01060583+0951204  2026-10-10.8543  14.54Cmag
17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2  TCP J17541876-2736362  2026-10-12.3993  10.8mag
09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2  PNV J09560079+6906152  2026-10-14.9274  19.38Cmag
00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3  PNV J00433083+4126553  2026-10-17.5651  18.61Cmag
04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6  TCP J04573208+3015416  2026-10-17.7818  18.21Cmag
05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3  TCP J05210764+2338213  2026-10-18.4020  10.3mag
05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5  TCP J05341101+2845305  2026-10-18.3604  16.6mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 27 21:12 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
10:32:09.821 +11:37:46.17  AT 2026aetj  2026-10-01.53 18.5059
16:11:43.883 +20:59:33.48  AT 2026aeti  2026-10-03.14 19.2268
19:55:55.462 +58:10:08.22  AT 2026aeth  2026-10-02.16 20.7283
14:55:19.146 +37:33:21.65  AT 2026aetg  2026-10-02.14 17.2445
14:51:59.504 +47:04:29.76  AT 2026aetf  2026-10-02.14 19.1738
06:50:36.388 +58:36:08.80  SN 2026aete  2026-10-07.53 19.306
09:20:29.340 +55:06:35.79  SN 2026aetd  2026-10-07.54 17.677
08:26:28.724 +38:08:57.54  AT 2026aetc  2026-10-02.47 19.3657
06:41:51.189 +21:53:58.11  SN 2026aetb  2026-10-07.46 19.5374
08:34:43.981 +46:14:33.95  AT 2026aeta  2026-10-02.51 19.5454
09:00:29.362 -03:20:55.67  AT 2026aesz  2026-10-03.53 19.6849
08:06:22.231 +46:59:03.50  AT 2026aesy  2026-10-01.51 19.6229
07:51:57.166 +45:05:58.19  AT 2026aesx  2026-10-01.41 19.6203
08:06:59.965 +46:08:20.08  AT 2026aesw  2026-10-01.41 19.7007
09:54:13.819 +04:50:26.21  AT 2026aesv  2026-10-01.53 19.1617
10:03:36.908 -05:05:53.11  AT 2026aesu  2026-10-01.53 17.8861
10:00:58.300 +04:55:31.23  AT 2026aest  2026-10-07.53 19.3128
04:23:19.588 -47:59:25.70  AT 2026aess  2026-02-23.11 23.4645
08:59:18.240 +10:57:46.23  AT 2026aesr  2026-10-05.52 19.89
19:23:47.930 -12:36:03.40  AT 2026aesq  2026-10-06.12 18.38
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 27 21:12 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Tue Oct 27 21:08:48 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 3 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 6s (0.10 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 39s (0.65 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 9s (0.15 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 6s (0.10 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 62s (1.03 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 9 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 2 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 5 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 21s (0.35 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 38s (0.63 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 2s (0.03 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 3s (0.05 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 8s (0.13 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 72s (1.20 min)
FIELD_UMa-05-Q1b1x1: 152s (2.53 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 329s (5.48 min)
Finished: Tue Oct 27 21:14:17 CDT 2026