NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Aql-05-Q2b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=esa_tap (lib/gaia_dr2_cone_search.sh -> ESA Gaia Archive TAP service)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Aql-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Aql-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Aql-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 451479 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 451479 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.png' -> 'transient_report/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits_preview.png'
Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits

renamed 'Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.png' -> 'transient_report/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits_preview.png'
Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 630.6386 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 571.7555 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 16239.5858 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 3047.9834 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 16269.3407 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 3074.1704 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 25.751 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.009 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.2800006866455 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-23T23:51:39.2059186' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-24T04:51:39.2059186' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61337.2025370947 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-24T04:51:49.1092825' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61337.2026517247 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 308.570802091096 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -2.00008686690062 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 27.5922222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 246.776944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.15141444814721 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Aql-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '20 34 17' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-02 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20708 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20708 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.2800006866455 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.2800006866455 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 71.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 1.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 8.600688 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/d_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits :) Spent 0.612521 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/d_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-23T23:52:29.9087523' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-24T04:52:29.9087523' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61337.203123935 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-24T04:52:39.8100769' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61337.2032385417 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 308.570802144403 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -2.0000868601748 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 27.4325 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 246.928333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.16285306172735 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Aql-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '20 34 17' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-02 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20708 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20708 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 71.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 1.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 8.600688 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/d_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits :) Spent 0.846648 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/d_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits


fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits Last image: 2461337.70265284 24.10.2026 04:51:39.205 UTC WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 as too few input images were matched to the reference image - wrong pointing? clouds? very bad focus? Blind plate solve of the unmatched second-epoch image fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits to check the telescope pointing Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits .... Determining astrometry method... Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 72 high-SNR stars for plate solving This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Reading input file 1 of 1: "out434449.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out434449.axy"... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). log-odds ratio 90.1084 (1.36011e+39), 13 match, 0 conflict, 39 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (308.608,-1.9784), pixel scale 5.95114 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+-++--+----++---+-----+-------------------+----+(best)-----------------+++ Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out434449.solved to indicate this. Field: out434449.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (308.601660, -1.979048) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (20:34:24.398, -01:58:44.572). Field size: 15.7285 x 10.5456 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 179.541 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. Opening FITS image file input.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_input.fits)... done! done! All done! Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run Reading input file 1 of 1: "out434449.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out434449.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.68 degrees of RA,Dec (308.601,-1.97988) log-odds ratio 90.1084 (1.36011e+39), 13 match, 0 conflict, 39 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (308.608,-1.9784), pixel scale 5.95114 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+-++--+----++---+-----+-------------------+----+(best)-----------------+++ Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out434449.solved to indicate this. Field: out434449.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (308.600866, -1.979047) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (20:34:24.208, -01:58:44.570). Field size: 15.7185 x 10.5425 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 179.579 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. Opening FITS image file input.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_input.fits)... done! done! All done! Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... simplexy: found 731 sources. Solving... Reading file "/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/out434449_image_verify.HsBhW5/solution.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4622, 951.337] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 110.339 (8.31127e+47), 11 match, 0 conflict, 221 distractors, 11 index. RA,Dec = (308.602,-1.97821), pixel scale 5.96076 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+---+-+---+---+-+-+---+----+---------------------------------------------------------------------- --> log-odds 110.339 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 212.542 (2.02225e+92), 20 match, 0 conflict, 212 distractors, 22 index. RA,Dec = (308.602,-1.97821), pixel scale 5.96076 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+--++-+---+---+-+-++--++-+-+-----+----+-----------+---+------------------------------------------- --> log-odds 212.542 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 460.273 (7.83123e+199), 46 match, 0 conflict, 210 distractors, 50 index. RA,Dec = (308.602,-1.97821), pixel scale 5.96076 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-+++-++-+++--+-+-+++-++-+-+-----+++-+++++++--+-+++++-+-+-------+-+--------------+-+-------------+ --> log-odds 460.273 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 726.139 (inf), 77 match, 0 conflict, 179 distractors, 94 index. RA,Dec = (308.602,-1.97821), pixel scale 5.96076 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-+++-++-++++-+-++++++++-+-+--++-++++++++++++-+-+++++-+++++----+++++---+++-----+-+-+--+++--------+ --> log-odds 726.139 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1377.4 (inf), 154 match, 0 conflict, 217 distractors, 197 index. RA,Dec = (308.602,-1.97821), pixel scale 5.96076 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-+++-++-++++-+-++++++++-+-++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++-+++++++--++++++--++++++--+++++---++++ --> log-odds 1377.4 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 2312.91 (inf), 273 match, 0 conflict, 274 distractors, 380 index. RA,Dec = (308.602,-1.97821), pixel scale 5.96076 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-+++-++-++++-+-++++++++-+-++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-++++++--++++++--+++++---++++ --> log-odds 2312.91 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3746.51 (inf), 464 match, 0 conflict, 249 distractors, 723 index. RA,Dec = (308.602,-1.97821), pixel scale 5.96076 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-+++-++-++++-+-++++++++-+-++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++-+++++++++++++---++++ --> log-odds 3746.51 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 4773.23 (inf), 626 match, 0 conflict, 103 distractors, 1452 index. RA,Dec = (308.602,-1.97821), pixel scale 5.96076 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-+++-++-++++-+-++++++++-+-++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++-+-+++++++-+++++++++++++--+++++ --> log-odds 4773.23 Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4622, 951.337] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 110.339 (8.31127e+47), 11 match, 0 conflict, 221 distractors, 11 index. RA,Dec = (308.602,-1.97821), pixel scale 5.96076 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+---+-+---+---+-+-+---+----+---------------------------------------------------------------------- --> log-odds 110.339 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 212.542 (2.02225e+92), 20 match, 0 conflict, 212 distractors, 22 index. RA,Dec = (308.602,-1.97821), pixel scale 5.96076 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+--++-+---+---+-+-++--++-+-+-----+----+-----------+---+------------------------------------------- --> log-odds 212.542 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 460.273 (7.83123e+199), 46 match, 0 conflict, 210 distractors, 50 index. RA,Dec = (308.602,-1.97821), pixel scale 5.96076 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-+++-++-+++--+-+-+++-++-+-+-----+++-+++++++--+-+++++-+-+-------+-+--------------+-+-------------+ --> log-odds 460.273 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 726.139 (inf), 77 match, 0 conflict, 179 distractors, 94 index. RA,Dec = (308.602,-1.97821), pixel scale 5.96076 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-+++-++-++++-+-++++++++-+-+--++-++++++++++++-+-+++++-+++++----+++++---+++-----+-+-+--+++--------+ --> log-odds 726.139 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1377.4 (inf), 154 match, 0 conflict, 217 distractors, 197 index. RA,Dec = (308.602,-1.97821), pixel scale 5.96076 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-+++-++-++++-+-++++++++-+-++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++-+++++++--++++++--++++++--+++++---++++ --> log-odds 1377.4 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 2312.91 (inf), 273 match, 0 conflict, 274 distractors, 380 index. RA,Dec = (308.602,-1.97821), pixel scale 5.96076 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-+++-++-++++-+-++++++++-+-++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-++++++--++++++--+++++---++++ --> log-odds 2312.91 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3746.51 (inf), 464 match, 0 conflict, 249 distractors, 723 index. RA,Dec = (308.602,-1.97821), pixel scale 5.96076 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-+++-++-++++-+-++++++++-+-++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++-+++++++++++++---++++ --> log-odds 3746.51 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 4773.23 (inf), 626 match, 0 conflict, 103 distractors, 1452 index. RA,Dec = (308.602,-1.97821), pixel scale 5.96076 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-+-+++-++-++++-+-++++++++-+-++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++-+-+++++++-+++++++++++++--+++++ --> log-odds 4773.23 Got 16 solutions. Field: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (308.600749, -1.978933) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (20:34:24.180, -01:58:44.159). Field size: 15.7143 x 10.5333 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 179.577 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/out434449_image_verify.HsBhW5/solution.new"... renamed '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/out434449_image_verify.HsBhW5/solution.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits Generating wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 20:34:23.982 -01:58:47.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 72 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_436974.cat.log' 'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.xy2sky.c4skqW' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_436974.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the blindly solved unmatched second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89 Second-epoch image center 20:34:23.982 -01:58:47.16 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0447 deg. ################################### The second-epoch image center is consistent with the reference image center (offset 0.0447 deg.) - the star matching failure is probably not a pointing problem ____ VaST output ____ --==VaST 1.0rc90==-- Parsing command line arguments... opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius! opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching! opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source! opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted! opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope) opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag! WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars. opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done! opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually! opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored! INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ... Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found. This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file. Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2)... OK Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files. Done with cleaning! VaST was started with the following command line: ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits Preparing to process 4 input FITS images... ######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ######## transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search! transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search! transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!! transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3 transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars transient search mode: not discarding large sources ################ Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix We have 4 images to process. SExtractor catalog cache: restored Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits catalog from cache SExtractor catalog cache: restored Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits catalog from cache Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads... Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits Parent process says: we are done fork()ing. Waiting for thread 2 to finish... The gain value (GAIN=0.370) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user The gain value (GAIN=0.370) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 6.3,6.3,5.7,6.9,7.6,8.2 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 6.2,6.2,5.6,6.9,7.5,8.1 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits Waiting for thread 1 to finish... autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits Done with SExtractor! TIMING SExtractor: 1 seconds Matching stars between images! No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine. Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-22T08:34:34.2111425 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-22T08:34:34.2111425 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-06-22T08:34:34.211 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits Exposure 20 sec, 22.06.2026 08:34:34.211 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461213.85745615 mid. exp. The reference image star 7918.310 26.236 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7834.823 28.326 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8630.127 23.029 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8332.039 17.309 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9278.110 15.917 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9304.602 10.596 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8137.320 11.007 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8982.767 8.567 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8265.896 5.768 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7527.205 3.858 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more reference image stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 12385, (12385 good for image matching) * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 3215 * rejected close to frame edge: 67 * rejected as being too small (<1.6 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>6.3 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 7 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied. get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.44 Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.4 (4.0 sigma detection) The simple faintest star detection limit= -9.8 80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -10.5 Selected detection limit= -10.5 Final detection limit= -10.5 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0) Parameter box for transient search: 10.06.3 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 9 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 12360 * detected, using 498/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.011950, number_of_ambiguous_matches=148 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=11547 inliers=11547 rms 0.42 -> 0.41 pix, max corner correction 0.4 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.006540, number_of_ambiguous_matches=81 11540 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=11540 inliers=11540 rms 0.17 -> 0.17 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.003553, number_of_ambiguous_matches=44 11538 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=11538 inliers=11538 rms 0.12 -> 0.12 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001776, number_of_ambiguous_matches=22 11538 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = -0.001 12360 stars detected, 11538 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 10699, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 10699 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 10699 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00000*X_pix -0.00000*Y_pix -0.00005 Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)... Computing robust linear magnitude calibration. Used 10698 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.44 13207 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) Magnitude calibration is performed successfully! Saving observations to the cache... OK memory: 203920 kB used, 238476 kB peak, 65261732 kB available RAM processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-24T04:51:39.2059186 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-24T04:51:39.2059186 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-10-24T04:51:39.205 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits The star 8288.309 2469.199 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7993.470 2585.622 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7506.340 2886.372 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7675.794 5337.802 is rejected, see bad_region.lst SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 68 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 4 * rejected close to frame edge: 0 * rejected as being too small (<1.6 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>6.3 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 0 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 68 * detected, using 100/ 68 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=1 pairs=33 inliers=33 rms 1.19 -> 0.60 pix, max corner correction 3.6 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0 33 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=33 inliers=33 rms 0.60 -> 0.60 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0 33 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=33 inliers=33 rms 0.60 -> 0.60 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0 33 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = -179.863 68 stars detected, 33 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 22 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 9, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -9.14  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  13207 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) memory: 233784 kB used, 238476 kB peak, 65261732 kB available RAM processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-24T04:52:29.9087523 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-24T04:52:29.9087523 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-10-24T04:52:29.908 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits The star 8280.536 2476.654 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9069.289 4458.154 is rejected, see bad_region.lst SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 71 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 2 * rejected close to frame edge: 1 * rejected as being too small (<1.6 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>6.2 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 0 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 71 * detected, using 100/ 71 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=1 pairs=35 inliers=35 rms 0.84 -> 0.63 pix, max corner correction 1.2 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0 35 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=35 inliers=35 rms 0.63 -> 0.63 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0 35 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=35 inliers=35 rms 0.63 -> 0.63 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0 35 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = -179.873 71 stars detected, 35 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 23 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 9, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -9.13  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  13207 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) memory: 233796 kB used, 238476 kB peak, 65261732 kB available RAM processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%) TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds Done with measurements! =) Total number of measurements 24745 (24745 measurements stored in RAM) Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory... Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files... TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory... Creating vast_image_details.log ... Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK Selecting the best aperture for each source Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 2804 stars Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 3038 stars Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 1303 stars Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 1468 stars Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 2925 stars done! =) TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds WARNING: Can't open candidates-transients.lst for reading! -- No candidates found? Non-zero exit code of lib/transient_list ERROR running lib/create_list_of_candidate_transients.sh Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make' Computing, please wait a bit .................................................................................................................. vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 11439 objects, the longest string is 383 bytes. Allocating memory for resorting the file. ----***** VaST processing WARNING *****---- You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one. Please investigate this! ************************************************************** This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic messages printed above (or the vast*.log files): * How many of the input images are matched? * Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable? * Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent? You may run ./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings (star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration file, see various examples in the VaST directory). If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/ ************************************************************** Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1) _____________________ ERROR running VaST on the field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 (less than 4 images processed) exp_start= 22.06.2026 08:34:34.211 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461213.85745615 ap= 6.3 rotation= 0.000 *detected= 12385 *matched= 12385 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits exp_start= 22.06.2026 08:35:21.479 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461213.85800323 ap= 6.3 rotation= -0.001 *detected= 12360 *matched= 11538 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits exp_start= 24.10.2026 04:51:39.205 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461337.70265284 ap= 6.3 rotation= -179.863 *detected= 68 *matched= 33 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits exp_start= 24.10.2026 04:52:29.908 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461337.70323968 ap= 6.2 rotation= -179.873 *detected= 71 *matched= 35 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461337.70265284 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 20:34:23.982 -01:58:47.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89 Second-epoch image center 20:34:23.982 -01:58:47.16 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0447 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 20:34:20.972 -01:58:02.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89 Second-epoch image center 20:34:20.972 -01:58:02.32 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0487 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 20:34:23.982 -01:58:47.16 Second-epoch second image center 20:34:20.972 -01:58:02.32 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01767 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3D45IVQAWf Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DrjD5Qh2DM Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nXTpYKaxXo Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pUoIzraADJ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 116458 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7115 to 316.4620 deg, Dec -7.2813 to +3.2588 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7115 to 316.4620 deg, Dec -7.2813 to 3.2588 deg Loaded 10831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7959 out of 9785 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 9785 out of 116458 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.544800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.544800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.09 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 116458 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7115 to 316.4620 deg, Dec -7.2813 to +3.2588 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7115 to 316.4620 deg, Dec -7.2813 to 3.2588 deg Loaded 10831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7959 out of 9785 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 9785 out of 116458 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (aperture=4.7) Read 116829 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7020 to 316.4481 deg, Dec -7.2679 to +3.2723 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7020 to 316.4481 deg, Dec -7.2679 to 3.2723 deg Loaded 10830 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7953 out of 9799 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 9799 out of 116829 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (aperture=4.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits 2.1 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits 2.1 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits 2.0 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits 15.4 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits 9.8 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits 9.7 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 9.7 (SNR ) 9.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.3D45IVQAWf (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=9969, bad_region=16899, passed=116431 Got 116431 stars (including 90648 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 116431 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4858 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 103686 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 103686 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 103685 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 4858 stars left (next iteration limit 5343) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits N_match=4858 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=1574 n_q2=897 n_q3=1525 n_q4=862 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.222 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4858 N_valid=4858 bias_ra_arcsec=0.016 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.306 p95_sep_arcsec=1.317 n_q1=1574 n_q2=897 n_q3=1525 n_q4=862 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.DrjD5Qh2DM (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=10115, bad_region=16944, passed=116800 Got 116800 stars (including 90836 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 116800 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4856 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 104005 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 104005 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 104004 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 4856 stars left (next iteration limit 5341) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits N_match=4856 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1556 n_q2=906 n_q3=1529 n_q4=865 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4856 N_valid=4856 bias_ra_arcsec=0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.013 median_sep_arcsec=0.321 p95_sep_arcsec=1.280 n_q1=1556 n_q2=906 n_q3=1529 n_q4=865 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.nXTpYKaxXo (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=16, bad_region=49, passed=1083 Got 1083 stars (including 1019 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1083 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.01" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1042 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.99" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1043 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.08" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1043 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.09" Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1038) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=946 robust_rms=6.786 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.902 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.160 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=946 robust_rms=1.059 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.132 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.132 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=946 robust_rms_before=1.269 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=1.134 arcsec robust_rms_after=1.059 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.367 worst_region_rms_after=1.132 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.367 outer_annulus_rms_after=1.132 verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits.sip_refit.6EvPuF/candidate.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits.sip_refit.6EvPuF/candidate.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 20:34:24.019 -01:58:47.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 1083 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits.sip_refit.6EvPuF/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_448455.cat.log' 'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits.sip_refit.6EvPuF/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.9Vsm42' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_448455.cat.log' SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 1.269 -> 1.059 arcsec) SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 5.3 arcsec, 946 pairs from the previous matching) UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success SIP_REFIT: re-match found 922 pairs (946 from the previous matching) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=922 robust_rms=6.735 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.411 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=8.937 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=922 robust_rms=1.051 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.129 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.129 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=922 robust_rms_before=1.049 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=1.049 arcsec robust_rms_after=1.051 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.092 worst_region_rms_after=1.129 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.092 outer_annulus_rms_after=1.129 SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 1.129 vs 1.092 arcsec) - keeping the current solution SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1042 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.94" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1042 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.93" WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits N_match=922 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.053 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.034 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.997 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.045 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.922 n_q1=423 n_q2=141 n_q3=255 n_q4=103 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.992 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=922 N_valid=922 bias_ra_arcsec=0.023 bias_dec_arcsec=0.021 median_sep_arcsec=0.841 p95_sep_arcsec=2.145 n_q1=423 n_q2=141 n_q3=255 n_q4=103 occupied_cells_4x4=15/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.pUoIzraADJ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=15, bad_region=39, passed=1058 Got 1058 stars (including 1001 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1058 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.04" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1019 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.00" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1018 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.09" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1018 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.09" Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1021) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=931 robust_rms=7.584 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.173 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.406 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=931 robust_rms=1.060 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.171 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.171 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=931 robust_rms_before=1.259 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=1.109 arcsec robust_rms_after=1.060 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.294 worst_region_rms_after=1.171 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.448 outer_annulus_rms_after=1.171 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 1.294 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits worst_region_rms_kept=1.294 arcsec robust_rms_kept=1.109 arcsec matched=931 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.086 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.026 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.074 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.196 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.155 n_q1=391 n_q2=168 n_q3=257 n_q4=115 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=931 N_valid=931 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.374 bias_dec_arcsec=0.499 median_sep_arcsec=1.077 p95_sep_arcsec=2.623 n_q1=391 n_q2=168 n_q3=257 n_q4=115 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-51-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0108.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 18839_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109 The candidate 18839_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 24.20324    2461337.70324    7.99    20:49:56.36 -05:08:48.1   2449 5145   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits **** FOUND 20:49:56.38 -05:08:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 18819_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109 The candidate 18819_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 24.20324    2461337.70324    6.47    20:47:44.09 -05:01:39.9   2782 5068   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-23_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_235323_TTUQ2b1x1_404070_NdZA2Yp2/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-23_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0109.fits **** FOUND 20:47:44.11 -05:01:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Aql-05-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461337.70265284 -observatory V36 15:09:13.84 -20:48:14.7 Mercury (0.5mag) 13:43:23.94 -17:40:33.5 Venus (-4.2mag) 09:08:31.08 +17:56:18.2 Mars (0.9mag) 09:41:59.44 +14:29:55.5 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:38:54.48 +01:15:10.7 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:10:32.03 +20:54:00.8 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:09:09.44 -00:33:09.8 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:12.75 -23:42:51.3 Pluto (14.5mag) 00:12:30.30 +04:13:19.1 Moon (-12.1mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 23 23:57 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461337.70265284: 09:41:57.26 +14:30:08.4 Io (6.1mag) 09:41:49.43 +14:30:52.4 Europa (6.2mag) 09:41:54.47 +14:30:24.4 Ganymede (5.5mag) 09:41:43.25 +14:31:27.9 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:42:41.89 +14:45:26.0 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:41:56.40 +14:30:12.5 Thebe (16.4mag) 09:41:11.79 +14:53:58.2 Elara (17.4mag) 09:43:33.01 +13:54:32.7 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:39:41.76 +14:59:57.8 Carme (18.8mag) 00:38:54.28 +01:15:27.2 Titan (8.2mag) 00:38:58.64 +01:14:55.2 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:38:59.49 +01:13:41.4 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:39:06.22 +01:15:11.9 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:37:09.07 +01:02:46.7 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 23 23:57 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461337.70265284: 03:58:17.07 +19:41:37.6 JWST 16:10:50.44 +47:38:33.3 Chandra 06:11:12.48 +24:01:28.0 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 23 23:57 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461337.70265284 -observatory V36 03:40:29.80 +20:08:12.2 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:42:37.20 +37:41:30.5 17.9mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill) 07:42:42.23 +37:41:17.9 17.9mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 07:42:02.77 +37:41:31.6 18.0mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill) 05:02:43.58 +40:37:30.0 17.9mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski) 18:37:03.86 -33:10:17.7 14.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:43:51.40 -73:14:46.9 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:13:51.96 +35:01:18.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:36:55.10 +48:02:08.2 17.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 07:34:07.96 +25:21:48.0 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:06:45.02 +37:09:11.5 16.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:31:11.30 +41:03:37.8 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:45:33.51 -13:39:54.9 16.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:41:39.37 +14:57:26.4 15.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 14:04:14.93 -03:46:37.4 16.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 19:35:00.96 +59:12:33.3 15.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:21:36.97 +41:10:43.7 18.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:57:56.17 +15:39:53.4 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:21:12.49 -55:25:46.8 13.7mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 19:24:36.93 -05:09:35.4 16.7mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS) 23:54:11.92 +16:35:03.5 17.1mag 2P/Encke 23:13:12.81 -28:34:25.0 15.0mag 10P/Tempel 02:27:42.53 +35:15:16.5 16.4mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:19:41.15 -09:12:31.4 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:15:02.67 -09:05:29.6 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 07:50:59.05 +14:38:25.0 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 02:46:07.80 +13:38:45.1 17.9mag 88P/Howell 08:25:03.55 +43:37:23.5 17.0mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:30:58.05 +09:27:02.9 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 12:06:54.34 +10:20:16.3 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 14:39:43.23 -35:39:32.4 18.0mag 124P/Mrkos 20:20:50.50 +11:04:47.2 9.9mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:49:39.83 -01:09:59.0 15.4mag 169P/NEAT 03:20:08.45 +03:05:41.9 15.0mag 220P/McNaught 06:18:19.79 +47:52:59.3 15.5mag 260P/McNaught 07:44:56.08 +25:17:37.4 17.7mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Oct 23 23:57 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm VIZIER 01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl ------- 18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl ------- 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif ------- 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl VIZIER 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj VIZIER 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv ------- 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc ------- 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa ------- 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg VIZIER 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs ------- 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs ------- 00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv ------- 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh ------- 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi ------- 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs ------- 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars ------- 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh ------- 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc VIZIER 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw ------- 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj ------- 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv ------- 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa VIZIER 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 ------- 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez VIZIER 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo ------- 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy ------- 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid ------- 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn ------- 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib ------- 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew VIZIER 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv ------- 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau ------- 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo ------- 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy ------- 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek ------- 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev VIZIER 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm ------- 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er VIZIER 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep VIZIER 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et VIZIER 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk ------- 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu VIZIER 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo VIZIER 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej VIZIER 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek VIZIER 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei VIZIER 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb ------- 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh VIZIER 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le ------- 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb ------- 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil ------- 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee VIZIER 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu ------- 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg ------- 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea VIZIER 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb VIZIER 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp ------- 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz VIZIER -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 9.3K Oct 23 23:57 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag 05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag 05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 23 23:57 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 01:56:50.726 -00:15:50.01 AT 2026aekq 2026-10-04.54 20.65 21:53:52.165 -03:57:11.79 AT 2026aekp 2026-10-04.30 20.65 21:09:53.506 -04:58:54.11 AT 2026aeko 2026-10-04.29 20.26 04:13:29.796 -06:55:30.79 AT 2026aekn 2026-10-03.57 20.84 02:32:58.393 +13:55:00.06 AT 2026aekm 2026-10-04.42 20.04 01:05:52.095 +06:54:00.24 AT 2026aekl 2026-10-04.53 19.74 05:09:54.501 -31:21:30.57 AT 2026aekk 2026-10-05.77 20.11 01:29:07.892 -26:42:21.39 AT 2026aekj 2026-10-05.60 19.74 06:14:23.530 -19:34:40.68 AT 2026aeki 2026-10-03.70 19.19 05:58:35.793 -31:52:49.19 AT 2026aekh 2026-10-03.72 20.02 22:42:30.822 +15:28:22.07 AT 2026aekg 2026-10-05.87 19.9 22:38:34.879 -03:25:35.76 AT 2026aekf 2026-10-05.87 20.25 07:32:36.549 -37:03:17.03 AT 2026aeke 2026-10-05.60 19.029 19:25:22.740 -32:13:07.77 AT 2026aekd 2026-10-05.27 17.996 09:12:21.710 -05:34:42.86 AT 2026aekc 2026-10-05.62 18.67 08:29:04.899 -04:03:01.61 AT 2026aekb 2026-10-05.52 19.2696 03:04:56.578 -27:30:12.21 AT 2026aeka 2026-09-18.79 20.21 01:40:37.614 -22:02:34.42 AT 2026aejz 2026-10-03.60 19.79 03:48:35.736 -31:55:43.92 AT 2026aejy 2026-10-03.65 20.11 16:14:39.042 +07:02:42.65 AT 2026aejx 2026-10-05.22 16.65 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 23 23:57 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 89 C