NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMi-02-Q2b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMi-02-Q2b1x1 reference image: UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
Field UMi-02-Q2b1x1 reference image: UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
Field UMi-02-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
Field UMi-02-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMi-02-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMi-02-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMi-02-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 534290 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 534290 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.png' -> 'transient_report/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits_preview.png'
UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits

renamed 'UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.png' -> 'transient_report/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits_preview.png'
UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 522.6192 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 519.1383 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4811.1163 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1558.6176 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4683.4705 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1532.8489 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 9.20578 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.017 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 15.7399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-21T23:32:41.1651435' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-22T04:32:41.1651435' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61335.1893653357 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-22T04:32:51.0668189' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61335.1894799303 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 215.998695837793 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 69.9999644286731 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 17.4488888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 346.836111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.30166511915433 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMi-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '14 24 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20721 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20721 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 15.7399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 15.7399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 78.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 907.11 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.400032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/d_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits :) Spent 0.628907 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/d_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 15.7600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-21T23:33:21.9051962' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-22T04:33:21.9051962' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61335.1898368634 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-22T04:33:31.8101489' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61335.1899515046 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 215.998695854896 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 69.9999644753932 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 17.4172222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 346.886388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.30735038172069 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMi-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '14 24 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20721 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20721 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 15.7600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 15.7600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 78.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 907.11 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.400032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/d_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits :) Spent 0.504953 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/d_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits


fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461335.68948108 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 14:24:01.593 +69:59:33.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits Image size: 937.8'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 14:23:51.835 +69:58:11.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 14:24:01.593 +69:59:33.71 Second-epoch image center 14:23:51.835 +69:58:11.87 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0267 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits Image size: 937.8'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 14:23:50.146 +69:57:37.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 14:24:01.593 +69:59:33.71 Second-epoch image center 14:23:50.146 +69:57:37.61 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0361 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 14:23:51.835 +69:58:11.87 Second-epoch second image center 14:23:50.146 +69:57:37.61 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00982 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NNI6EtqhtZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits &> /tmp/tmp.G6z9CXj5XS Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lhoWLz7hX4 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0AUp7JZZL7 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits and wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits and wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits and wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7945 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 187.9719 to 243.8628 deg, Dec +63.6716 to +75.2389 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 187.9719 to 243.8628 deg, Dec 63.6716 to 75.2389 deg Loaded 8088 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4821 out of 4988 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4988 out of 7945 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.724700 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.724700 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.29 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7945 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 187.9719 to 243.8628 deg, Dec +63.6716 to +75.2389 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 187.9719 to 243.8628 deg, Dec 63.6716 to 75.2389 deg Loaded 8088 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4821 out of 4988 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4988 out of 7945 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits (aperture=6.3) Read 7905 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 187.9736 to 243.8628 deg, Dec +63.6717 to +75.2223 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 187.9736 to 243.8628 deg, Dec 63.6717 to 75.2223 deg Loaded 8080 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4832 out of 4997 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4997 out of 7905 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits (aperture=6.3) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits 2.4 pix UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits 15.4 mag. UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits 13.4 mag. fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits 13.7 mag. fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 10.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.NNI6EtqhtZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=497, bad_region=1747, passed=7945 Got 7945 stars (including 5791 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7945 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6565 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6565 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6565 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=1741 n_q2=835 n_q3=1536 n_q4=781 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4893 N_valid=4893 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.023 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.011 median_sep_arcsec=0.307 p95_sep_arcsec=0.906 n_q1=1741 n_q2=835 n_q3=1536 n_q4=781 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits -region wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.G6z9CXj5XS (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=492, bad_region=1720, passed=7905 Got 7905 stars (including 5780 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7905 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6551 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6551 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6551 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5376) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.390 n_q1=1726 n_q2=841 n_q3=1532 n_q4=789 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4888 N_valid=4888 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.021 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.014 median_sep_arcsec=0.299 p95_sep_arcsec=0.926 n_q1=1726 n_q2=841 n_q3=1532 n_q4=789 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits -region wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.lhoWLz7hX4 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=86, bad_region=93, passed=821 Got 821 stars (including 645 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 821 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 769 to 828 (Dec 63.9 to 75.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 632 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 588 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 688 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 769 to 828 (Dec 63.9 to 75.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 632 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 630 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 685 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 630 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 685 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Excluding outliers - 630 stars left (next iteration limit 691) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: the 630 catalog matches do not cover the frame (223/26/324/57 per quadrant, need 39 in each) - keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits N_match=630 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.684 n_q1=223 n_q2=26 n_q3=324 n_q4=57 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.321 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=630 N_valid=630 bias_ra_arcsec=0.424 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.126 median_sep_arcsec=0.698 p95_sep_arcsec=1.458 n_q1=223 n_q2=26 n_q3=324 n_q4=57 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.0AUp7JZZL7 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=102, bad_region=109, passed=925 Got 925 stars (including 721 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 925 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 769 to 827 (Dec 63.9 to 75.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 703 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 699 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 656 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 699 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 775 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 769 to 827 (Dec 63.9 to 75.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 703 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 698 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 777 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 698 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 777 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 698 stars left (next iteration limit 768) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: the 698 catalog matches do not cover the frame (266/34/347/51 per quadrant, need 43 in each) - keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits N_match=698 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.485 n_q1=266 n_q2=34 n_q3=347 n_q4=51 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=698 N_valid=698 bias_ra_arcsec=0.368 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.192 median_sep_arcsec=0.685 p95_sep_arcsec=1.480 n_q1=266 n_q2=34 n_q3=347 n_q4=51 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.088 ref2=UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits sigma_overall=0.362 worst_q_ratio=1.107 new1=fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits sigma_overall=0.518 worst_q_ratio=1.321 new2=fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits sigma_overall=0.479 worst_q_ratio=1.093 reference average sigma_overall=0.3625 worst_q_ratio=1.0975 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q2: 26 -> 34, 23.529% > 20%; fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits vs fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659_astrometric_residuals.png (4893 matched stars from wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660_astrometric_residuals.png (4888 matched stars from wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185_astrometric_residuals.png (630 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186_astrometric_residuals.png (698 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMi-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field UMi-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits Last image: 2461335.68948108 22.10.2026 04:32:41.165 UTC WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field UMi-02-Q2b1x1 as too few input images were matched to the reference image - wrong pointing? clouds? very bad focus? Blind plate solve of the unmatched second-epoch image fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits to check the telescope pointing Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits .... Determining astrometry method... Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 1142 high-SNR stars for plate solving This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2789043.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out2789043.axy"... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10). log-odds ratio 489.644 (4.46545e+212), 69 match, 0 conflict, 316 distractors, 93 index. RA,Dec = (216.036,69.9866), pixel scale 5.95891 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+++++++++-+-+++++++++----+-+++++++-+++-+-+---+++---+-+-+-+-+-+---+-+---++-+--++----+---+--------- Field 1: solved with index index-4114.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2789043.solved to indicate this. Field: out2789043.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (215.972160, 69.969704) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:23:53.318, +69:58:10.933). Field size: 15.744 x 10.5474 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 177.782 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. Opening FITS image file input.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_input.fits)... done! done! All done! Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2789043.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out2789043.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.675 degrees of RA,Dec (215.97,69.9688) log-odds ratio 32.868 (1.881e+14), 5 match, 0 conflict, 5 distractors, 18 index. RA,Dec = (215.973,69.9731), pixel scale 5.96271 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-++--+-+(best)--------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2789043.solved to indicate this. Field: out2789043.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (215.965755, 69.971346) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:23:51.781, +69:58:16.844). Field size: 15.7247 x 10.5543 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 177.765 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. Opening FITS image file input.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_input.fits)... done! done! All done! Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... simplexy: found 5605 sources. Solving... Reading file "/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/out2789043_image_verify.h7cSKN/solution.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.5235, 952.255] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 56.5492 (3.62262e+24), 10 match, 0 conflict, 175 distractors, 10 index. RA,Dec = (215.968,69.9722), pixel scale 5.96651 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----++---------------+------------+------------------------+---------------------------------------- --> log-odds 56.5492 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 114.722 (6.65272e+49), 16 match, 0 conflict, 193 distractors, 18 index. RA,Dec = (215.968,69.9722), pixel scale 5.96651 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----++---+---------+-+----+-------+---------+--------------+---------------------------------------- --> log-odds 114.722 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 326.694 (7.61006e+141), 39 match, 0 conflict, 244 distractors, 51 index. RA,Dec = (215.968,69.9722), pixel scale 5.96651 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++---+++---+---+++----++-+----+-+-------+----+----++--++-------+---------------+--------------++ --> log-odds 326.694 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 645.774 (2.85811e+280), 76 match, 0 conflict, 489 distractors, 92 index. RA,Dec = (215.968,69.9722), pixel scale 5.96651 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+++++--+++---+---++++++-++-+--+++-+-----+-+-+--+-+--++--++---+---+---+-----+--+--+-----+++-+-+--++ --> log-odds 645.774 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1429.66 (inf), 175 match, 0 conflict, 870 distractors, 207 index. RA,Dec = (215.968,69.9722), pixel scale 5.96651 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++-++++--++-+++++++-++++--+++++++++-+++++--++++-++--++++-+--++--+++----+--++++++--++++-+-++-++ --> log-odds 1429.66 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 2560.42 (inf), 317 match, 0 conflict, 1082 distractors, 382 index. RA,Dec = (215.968,69.9722), pixel scale 5.96651 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++--+++++++++-+++++--+++++++++++++-+--+++-++++++++++++++++--++++-+-++-++ --> log-odds 2560.42 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 4555.21 (inf), 603 match, 0 conflict, 1193 distractors, 751 index. RA,Dec = (215.968,69.9722), pixel scale 5.96651 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-++++++++++-++++++-+++++++++++++-++-+++-++++++++++++++++-++++++++++-++ --> log-odds 4555.21 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 7539.78 (inf), 1091 match, 0 conflict, 2095 distractors, 1457 index. RA,Dec = (215.968,69.9722), pixel scale 5.96651 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-++++++++++-++++++-+++++++++++++-++-+++-++++++++++++++++-++++++++++-++ --> log-odds 7539.78 Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.5235, 952.255] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 56.5492 (3.62262e+24), 10 match, 0 conflict, 175 distractors, 10 index. RA,Dec = (215.968,69.9722), pixel scale 5.96651 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----++---------------+------------+------------------------+---------------------------------------- --> log-odds 56.5492 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 114.722 (6.65272e+49), 16 match, 0 conflict, 193 distractors, 18 index. RA,Dec = (215.968,69.9722), pixel scale 5.96651 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----++---+---------+-+----+-------+---------+--------------+---------------------------------------- --> log-odds 114.722 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 326.694 (7.61006e+141), 39 match, 0 conflict, 244 distractors, 51 index. RA,Dec = (215.968,69.9722), pixel scale 5.96651 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++---+++---+---+++----++-+----+-+-------+----+----++--++-------+---------------+--------------++ --> log-odds 326.694 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 645.774 (2.85811e+280), 76 match, 0 conflict, 489 distractors, 92 index. RA,Dec = (215.968,69.9722), pixel scale 5.96651 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+++++--+++---+---++++++-++-+--+++-+-----+-+-+--+-+--++--++---+---+---+-----+--+--+-----+++-+-+--++ --> log-odds 645.774 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1429.66 (inf), 175 match, 0 conflict, 870 distractors, 207 index. RA,Dec = (215.968,69.9722), pixel scale 5.96651 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++-++++--++-+++++++-++++--+++++++++-+++++--++++-++--++++-+--++--+++----+--++++++--++++-+-++-++ --> log-odds 1429.66 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 2560.42 (inf), 317 match, 0 conflict, 1082 distractors, 382 index. RA,Dec = (215.968,69.9722), pixel scale 5.96651 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++--+++++++++-+++++--+++++++++++++-+--+++-++++++++++++++++--++++-+-++-++ --> log-odds 2560.42 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 4555.21 (inf), 603 match, 0 conflict, 1193 distractors, 751 index. RA,Dec = (215.968,69.9722), pixel scale 5.96651 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-++++++++++-++++++-+++++++++++++-++-+++-++++++++++++++++-++++++++++-++ --> log-odds 4555.21 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 7539.78 (inf), 1091 match, 0 conflict, 2095 distractors, 1457 index. RA,Dec = (215.968,69.9722), pixel scale 5.96651 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-++++++++++-++++++-+++++++++++++-++-+++-++++++++++++++++-++++++++++-++ --> log-odds 7539.78 Got 16 solutions. Field: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (215.968307, 69.970826) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (14:23:52.394, +69:58:14.974). Field size: 15.7215 x 10.5485 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 177.797 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/out2789043_image_verify.h7cSKN/solution.new"... renamed '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/out2789043_image_verify.h7cSKN/solution.new' -> 'wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits Generating wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits Image size: 937.8'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 14:23:51.835 +69:58:11.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 6974 stars ### 'wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_2800520.cat.log' 'wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat.xy2sky.9CfEye' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_2800520.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the blindly solved unmatched second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 14:24:01.593 +69:59:33.71 Second-epoch image center 14:23:51.835 +69:58:11.87 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0267 deg. ################################### The second-epoch image center is consistent with the reference image center (offset 0.0267 deg.) - the star matching failure is probably not a pointing problem ____ VaST output ____ --==VaST 1.0rc90==-- Parsing command line arguments... opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius! opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching! opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source! opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted! opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope) opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag! WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars. opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done! opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually! opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored! INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ... Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found. This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file. Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ)... OK Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files. Done with cleaning! VaST was started with the following command line: ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits Preparing to process 4 input FITS images... ######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ######## transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search! transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search! transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!! transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3 transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars transient search mode: not discarding large sources ################ Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix We have 4 images to process. SExtractor catalog cache: restored UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits catalog from cache SExtractor catalog cache: restored UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits catalog from cache Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads... Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user Parent process says: we are done fork()ing. Waiting for thread 2 to finish... The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.7,4.7,4.3,5.2,5.7,6.2 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.8,4.8,4.3,5.3,5.8,6.2 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits Waiting for thread 1 to finish... Done with SExtractor! TIMING SExtractor: 5 seconds Matching stars between images! No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine. Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-04-19T08:48:47.4361653 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-04-19T08:48:47.4361653 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-04-19T08:48:47.436 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits Exposure 20 sec, 19.04.2026 08:48:47.436 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461149.86733143 mid. exp. The reference image star 8319.634 26.017 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9222.086 28.702 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7859.269 21.536 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7946.386 18.126 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8330.174 13.854 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9471.113 15.429 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9473.811 14.262 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8664.291 14.725 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7972.118 9.140 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8500.098 8.199 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more reference image stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 34645, (34643 good for image matching) * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 13 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 6627 * rejected close to frame edge: 162 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.9 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 80 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied. get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.02 Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.0 (4.0 sigma detection) The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.7 80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -7.8 Selected detection limit= -7.8 Final detection limit= -7.8 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0) Parameter box for transient search: 10.04.9 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 87 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 34511 * detected, using 498/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.014403, number_of_ambiguous_matches=499 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=1 pairs=32121 inliers=32121 rms 0.58 -> 0.58 pix, max corner correction 0.1 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.013249, number_of_ambiguous_matches=459 32117 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=32117 inliers=32117 rms 0.56 -> 0.56 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.007822, number_of_ambiguous_matches=271 32102 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=32102 inliers=32102 rms 0.50 -> 0.50 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.003060, number_of_ambiguous_matches=106 32087 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = -0.009 34511 stars detected, 32087 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 30591, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 30591 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 30588 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = -0.00000*X_pix -0.00000*Y_pix +0.00387 Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)... Computing robust linear magnitude calibration. Used 29108 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.02 37069 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) Magnitude calibration is performed successfully! Saving observations to the cache... OK memory: 217352 kB used, 257804 kB peak, 65261732 kB available RAM processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-22T04:32:41.1651435 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-22T04:32:41.1651435 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-10-22T04:32:41.165 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits The star 8583.330 14.071 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7979.195 7.992 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8654.490 41.576 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8651.641 47.936 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8259.437 55.309 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8683.686 65.246 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8443.483 70.984 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8340.848 89.245 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8386.179 97.456 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7637.488 113.782 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 6267 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 3 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 649 * rejected close to frame edge: 39 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.7 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 16 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 6267 * detected, using 100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000108, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=6082 inliers=6082 rms 1.06 -> 0.35 pix, max corner correction 9.8 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000108, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4 6081 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=6081 inliers=6081 rms 0.32 -> 0.32 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000081, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3 6078 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=6078 inliers=6078 rms 0.23 -> 0.23 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000027, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1 6076 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 1.824 6267 stars detected, 6076 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 5499, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 5499 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 4281 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00015*X_pix -0.00010*Y_pix +0.10292 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 4281 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -8.01  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  37069 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) memory: 215296 kB used, 257804 kB peak, 65261732 kB available RAM processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-22T04:33:21.9051962 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-22T04:33:21.9051962 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-10-22T04:33:21.905 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits The star 8581.666 8.492 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7977.369 2.575 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7636.483 17.227 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8652.852 35.818 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8650.059 42.360 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8682.011 59.706 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8441.766 65.524 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8339.104 83.503 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8384.440 91.669 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7635.756 108.134 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 6990 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 1 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 4 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 703 * rejected close to frame edge: 35 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.8 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 22 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 6990 * detected, using 100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000108, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=6803 inliers=6803 rms 1.26 -> 0.31 pix, max corner correction 9.4 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000108, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4 6803 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=6803 inliers=6803 rms 0.31 -> 0.31 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000054, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2 6800 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=6800 inliers=6800 rms 0.25 -> 0.25 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000027, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1 6796 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 1.825 6990 stars detected, 6796 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 6180, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 6180 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 5002 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00015*X_pix -0.00008*Y_pix +0.00324 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 5002 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -8.01  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  37069 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) memory: 215296 kB used, 257804 kB peak, 65261732 kB available RAM processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%) TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds Done with measurements! =) Total number of measurements 69156 (69156 measurements stored in RAM) Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory... Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files... TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory... Creating vast_image_details.log ... Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK Selecting the best aperture for each source Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 5919 stars Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 9002 stars Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 5527 stars Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 3989 stars Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 7650 stars done! =) TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make' Computing, please wait a bit ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 31910 objects, the longest string is 383 bytes. Allocating memory for resorting the file. ----***** VaST processing WARNING *****---- You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one. Please investigate this! ************************************************************** This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic messages printed above (or the vast*.log files): * How many of the input images are matched? * Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable? * Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent? You may run ./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings (star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration file, see various examples in the VaST directory). If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/ ************************************************************** Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1) _____________________ ERROR running VaST on the field UMi-02-Q2b1x1 (less than 4 images processed) exp_start= 19.04.2026 08:48:47.436 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461149.86733143 ap= 4.9 rotation= 0.000 *detected= 34645 *matched= 34645 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits exp_start= 19.04.2026 08:49:38.883 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461149.86792689 ap= 4.9 rotation= -0.009 *detected= 34511 *matched= 32087 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits exp_start= 22.10.2026 04:32:41.165 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461335.68948108 ap= 4.7 rotation= 1.824 *detected= 6267 *matched= 6076 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits exp_start= 22.10.2026 04:33:21.905 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461335.68995260 ap= 4.8 rotation= 1.825 *detected= 6990 *matched= 6796 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_233353_TTUQ2b1x1_2619922_DsITf6DJ/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits Source monitoring: NOT measuring the monitored positions on the field UMi-02-Q2b1x1 - the transient search raised a processing error: ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q2: 26 -> 34, 23.529% > 20%; fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-32-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits vs fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_23-33-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing Source monitoring: the monitored positions on the field UMi-02-Q2b1x1 are recorded as run_error (rejected by this run, never measured later) ########### Completed UMi-02-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461335.68948108 -observatory V36 15:07:55.92 -20:51:05.3 Mercury (0.3mag) 13:47:42.02 -18:24:31.6 Venus (-4.2mag) 09:04:10.48 +18:12:31.0 Mars (1.0mag) 09:40:52.58 +14:35:07.3 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:39:26.42 +01:18:22.8 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:10:48.29 +20:54:42.5 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:09:20.07 -00:32:03.0 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:11.14 -23:43:01.9 Pluto (14.5mag) 22:36:40.25 -08:17:55.7 Moon (-11.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 21 23:36 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461335.68948108: 09:40:46.81 +14:35:40.5 Io (6.1mag) 09:41:03.25 +14:34:07.7 Europa (6.2mag) 09:40:38.61 +14:36:27.1 Ganymede (5.5mag) 09:40:57.87 +14:34:40.0 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:41:25.95 +14:51:37.3 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:40:49.64 +14:35:23.7 Thebe (16.4mag) 09:39:58.66 +14:58:52.3 Elara (17.5mag) 09:42:35.06 +13:59:18.6 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:38:43.20 +15:04:44.0 Carme (18.8mag) 00:39:35.18 +01:18:24.7 Titan (8.2mag) 00:39:19.50 +01:18:21.0 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:39:25.19 +01:16:31.9 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:39:42.12 +01:18:07.6 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:37:41.54 +01:05:57.9 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 21 23:36 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461335.68948108: 03:49:07.82 +20:04:26.2 JWST 17:28:22.42 +35:53:17.3 Chandra 06:01:12.26 +28:22:56.2 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 21 23:36 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461335.68948108 -observatory V36 03:41:37.79 +20:09:36.1 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:41:38.53 +37:33:56.0 18.0mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill) 07:41:43.55 +37:33:43.3 18.0mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 07:41:04.43 +37:33:55.7 18.0mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill) 05:02:27.32 +40:52:06.9 17.9mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski) 18:35:00.43 -33:13:32.7 14.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:43:22.74 -73:06:50.9 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:14:15.30 +34:57:50.3 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:40:52.55 +48:11:16.0 17.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 07:33:39.31 +25:22:24.7 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:06:10.27 +36:54:06.7 16.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:30:16.30 +41:07:06.5 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:45:50.57 -13:39:59.7 16.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:37:42.42 +15:07:02.4 16.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 14:02:07.21 -03:36:48.4 16.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 19:26:53.90 +60:16:42.5 15.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:23:52.29 +41:32:39.5 18.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:56:00.95 +15:25:38.3 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:23:57.06 -52:12:12.6 13.6mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 19:22:53.36 -05:06:13.0 16.6mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS) 23:59:24.68 +17:01:54.4 17.2mag 2P/Encke 23:10:46.28 -29:05:57.7 14.9mag 10P/Tempel 02:25:10.08 +35:59:04.8 16.5mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:18:22.74 -09:02:40.8 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:16:04.74 -09:04:45.8 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 07:48:51.16 +14:51:14.6 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 02:48:25.74 +13:45:46.8 17.8mag 88P/Howell 08:17:56.98 +43:07:46.1 17.0mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:26:44.26 +10:12:06.5 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 12:02:53.87 +10:47:41.1 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 14:34:25.59 -35:08:44.8 18.0mag 124P/Mrkos 20:29:41.26 +10:12:25.5 9.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:44:56.17 -00:45:08.1 15.2mag 169P/NEAT 03:21:50.76 +03:18:36.2 15.0mag 220P/McNaught 06:16:39.14 +47:29:03.3 15.5mag 260P/McNaught 07:42:24.49 +25:20:33.3 17.7mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Oct 21 23:36 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm VIZIER 01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl ------- 18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl ------- 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif ------- 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl VIZIER 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj VIZIER 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv ------- 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc ------- 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa ------- 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg VIZIER 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs ------- 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs ------- 00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv ------- 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh ------- 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi ------- 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs ------- 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars ------- 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh ------- 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc VIZIER 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw ------- 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj ------- 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv ------- 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa VIZIER 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 ------- 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez VIZIER 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo ------- 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy ------- 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid ------- 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn ------- 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib ------- 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew VIZIER 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv ------- 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau ------- 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo ------- 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy ------- 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek ------- 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev VIZIER 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm ------- 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er VIZIER 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep VIZIER 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et VIZIER 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk ------- 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu VIZIER 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo VIZIER 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej VIZIER 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek VIZIER 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei VIZIER 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb ------- 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh VIZIER 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le ------- 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb ------- 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil ------- 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee VIZIER 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu ------- 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg ------- 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea VIZIER 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb VIZIER 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp ------- 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz VIZIER -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 9.3K Oct 21 23:36 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag 05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag 05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 21 23:36 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 01:10:49.770 +02:38:30.67 AT 2026aebt 2026-09-30.66 21.23 01:05:19.330 -00:11:32.74 AT 2026aebs 2026-09-30.65 21.65 01:35:09.144 -01:03:49.94 AT 2026aebr 2026-09-20.83 23.01 01:02:37.840 +04:28:02.19 AT 2026aebq 2026-09-20.82 22.78 01:28:12.190 +05:17:51.61 AT 2026aebp 2026-09-13.85 22.41 22:47:15.050 +03:42:02.27 AT 2026aebo 2026-09-21.73 22.04 23:45:08.040 +01:05:55.47 AT 2026aebn 2026-09-30.76 21.95 23:25:27.380 -00:44:47.15 AT 2026aebm 2026-09-15.74 22.29 00:43:52.136 -04:09:35.26 SN 2026aebl 2026-09-20.33 20.4818 23:57:05.580 +47:22:43.66 AT 2026aebk 2026-10-02.25 20.1485 21:45:41.050 -07:03:45.02 SN 2026aebj 2026-10-02.17 19.9213 01:27:33.024 +84:50:25.70 AT 2026aebi 2026-10-03.20 19.7953 00:26:39.140 -03:17:00.58 AT 2026aebh 2026-10-02.27 20.1095 21:28:41.378 +03:57:48.01 SN 2026aebg 2026-10-01.26 20.3099 00:57:54.471 -27:53:53.62 AT 2026aebf 2026-09-30.33 19.3916 22:47:58.650 +03:51:05.09 AT 2026aebe 2026-09-30.23 20.1921 23:27:00.498 -10:43:55.07 AT 2026aebd 2026-10-01.39 20.03 23:40:24.092 -09:27:20.60 AT 2026aebc 2026-10-01.39 20.07 00:56:09.593 -01:35:47.87 AT 2026aebb 2026-10-01.40 20.95 01:31:39.979 -01:39:43.87 AT 2026aeba 2026-10-01.46 21.45 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 21 23:36 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 87 C