This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 22.1730 2461335.6730 11.92 05:07:32.53 +26:11:39.6
177.58949 -8.53841 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales 0 -0 0 12.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:07:32.53 +26:11:39.6: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:07:32.53 +26:11:39.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 22.1730* 05 07 32.53 +26 11 39.6 11.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461335.6730,11.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261022.1730 11.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 22.1730 2461335.6730 13.21 04:30:35.34 +25:58:58.5
172.47783 -15.16123 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.112 Iphigenia -1 0 1 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:30:35.34 +25:58:58.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:30:35.34 +25:58:58.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 22.1730* 04 30 35.34 +25 58 58.5 13.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461335.6730,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261022.1730 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 22.1730 2461335.6730 13.24 04:36:19.46 +29:37:03.3
170.51391 -11.81868 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.224 Oceana 0 0 0 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:36:19.46 +29:37:03.3: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:36:19.46 +29:37:03.3: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 22.1730* 04 36 19.46 +29 37 03.3 13.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461335.6730,13.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261022.1730 13.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461335.67335575 22.10.2026 04:09:27.937 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15136
Objects passed selection criteria: 15032
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10167
Average stars matched: 9884 (97.2165 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 240836 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 21 23:11:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461335.67335575 22.10.2026 04:09:27.937 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 70
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 32 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 116383
Objects passed selection criteria: 116133
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 84103.5
Average stars matched: 80966 (96.2695 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 512988 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 21 23:13:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461335.67272341
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
Image size: 943.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:55.473 +29:59:01.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:55.473 +29:59:01.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0227 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Image size: 943.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:58.315 +29:58:47.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:58.315 +29:58:47.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0176 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:55.473 +29:59:01.66
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:58.315 +29:58:47.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01102 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4kh8iOsxzE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GDh02MmRkk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oCXPW3UR0d
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.S6NeurGg34
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.988300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.988300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2864 deg
Loaded 8429 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6042 out of 6743 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6743 out of 16349 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.4kh8iOsxzE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1498, bad_region=0, passed=16295
Got 16295 stars (including 14768 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=2038 n_q2=976 n_q3=1109 n_q4=678 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4801 N_valid=4801 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.256 p95_sep_arcsec=1.309 n_q1=2038 n_q2=976 n_q3=1109 n_q4=678 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.GDh02MmRkk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, bad_region=0, passed=16349
Got 16349 stars (including 14839 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4800 stars left (next iteration limit 5281)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4800 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=2037 n_q2=978 n_q3=1111 n_q4=674 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4800 N_valid=4800 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.258 p95_sep_arcsec=1.293 n_q1=2037 n_q2=978 n_q3=1111 n_q4=674 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.oCXPW3UR0d (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=254, bad_region=0, passed=4172
Got 4172 stars (including 3916 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4172 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013097 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010478 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 573 to 628 (Dec 24.6 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3747 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3747 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 573 to 628 (Dec 24.6 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3786 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3749 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3749 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 3749 stars left (next iteration limit 4121)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3749 robust_rms=10.174 arcsec worst_region_rms=17.216 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=17.216 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3749 robust_rms=0.548 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.891 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.891 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3749 robust_rms=0.357 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.436 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.436 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3749 robust_rms_before=1.089 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.386 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.357 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.471 worst_region_rms_after=0.436 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.054 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.436
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.471 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.471 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.386 arcsec matched=3749
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits N_match=3749 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=548 n_q2=601 n_q3=686 n_q4=1914 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3749 N_valid=3749 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.095 bias_dec_arcsec=0.786 median_sep_arcsec=1.021 p95_sep_arcsec=2.140 n_q1=548 n_q2=601 n_q3=686 n_q4=1914 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.S6NeurGg34 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=271, bad_region=0, passed=4106
Got 4106 stars (including 3834 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4106 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013097 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010478 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 573 to 628 (Dec 24.6 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3715 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3675 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3669 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3675 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4098 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 573 to 628 (Dec 24.6 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3713 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3678 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3678 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 3678 stars left (next iteration limit 4042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3678 robust_rms=10.589 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.928 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.928 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3678 robust_rms=0.559 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.857 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.857 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3678 robust_rms=0.354 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.445 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.445 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3678 robust_rms_before=1.084 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.375 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.354 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.449 worst_region_rms_after=0.445 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.078 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.445
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.449 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.449 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.375 arcsec matched=3678
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits N_match=3678 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=451 n_q2=669 n_q3=741 n_q4=1817 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3678 N_valid=3678 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.085 bias_dec_arcsec=0.807 median_sep_arcsec=1.036 p95_sep_arcsec=2.116 n_q1=451 n_q2=669 n_q3=741 n_q4=1817 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.114
ref2=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new1=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits sigma_overall=0.411 worst_q_ratio=1.157
new2=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.105
reference average sigma_overall=0.37 worst_q_ratio=1.1215
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (4801 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (4800 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137_astrometric_residuals.png (3749 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138_astrometric_residuals.png (3678 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.39 +34:08:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:21.59 +30:42:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
Image size: 943.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:55.473 +29:59:01.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:55.473 +29:59:01.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0227 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Image size: 943.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:58.315 +29:58:47.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:58.315 +29:58:47.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0176 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:55.473 +29:59:01.66
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:58.315 +29:58:47.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01102 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ShSkem8oCB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y2wYTI63cB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2oz4ABdyyv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dh8FrfsA2j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6871 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6871 out of 129003 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.844750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.844750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.81
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.81
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6871 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6871 out of 129003 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 129055 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.2955 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.2955 deg
Loaded 8479 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4936 out of 6879 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6879 out of 129055 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 63 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.8 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ShSkem8oCB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=14027, bad_region=9, passed=128967
Got 128967 stars (including 114713 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128967 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4788 stars left (next iteration limit 5267)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4788 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1870 n_q2=1035 n_q3=1152 n_q4=731 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4788 N_valid=4788 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.007 bias_dec_arcsec=0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.245 p95_sep_arcsec=1.190 n_q1=1870 n_q2=1035 n_q3=1152 n_q4=731 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Y2wYTI63cB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=13827, bad_region=12, passed=129020
Got 129020 stars (including 114961 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1874 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1148 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4791 N_valid=4791 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.253 p95_sep_arcsec=1.164 n_q1=1874 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1148 n_q4=723 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2oz4ABdyyv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1429, bad_region=9, passed=40382
Got 40382 stars (including 38869 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40382 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013097 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010478 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40350 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40350 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40350 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4793 stars left (next iteration limit 5269)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4793 robust_rms=10.128 arcsec worst_region_rms=18.457 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=18.457 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4793 robust_rms=0.544 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.919 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.919 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4793 robust_rms=0.360 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.433 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.433 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4793 robust_rms_before=1.071 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.377 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.360 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.487 worst_region_rms_after=0.433 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.026 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.433
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 1.071 -> 0.360 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits is a symbolic link
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4793 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4612 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4612 pairs (4793 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4612 robust_rms=10.020 arcsec worst_region_rms=18.284 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=18.284 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4612 robust_rms=0.548 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.873 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.873 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4612 robust_rms=0.358 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.433 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.433 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4612 robust_rms_before=0.358 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.358 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.358 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.433 worst_region_rms_after=0.433 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.433 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.433
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 0.358 -> 0.358 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits is a symbolic link
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4612 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40350 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4612 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits N_match=4612 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.368 n_q1=747 n_q2=765 n_q3=851 n_q4=2249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4612 N_valid=4612 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.119 bias_dec_arcsec=0.776 median_sep_arcsec=0.979 p95_sep_arcsec=1.759 n_q1=747 n_q2=765 n_q3=851 n_q4=2249 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.dh8FrfsA2j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1387, bad_region=10, passed=40214
Got 40214 stars (including 38760 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40214 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013097 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010478 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4797 stars left (next iteration limit 5274)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4797 robust_rms=10.373 arcsec worst_region_rms=17.944 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=17.944 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4797 robust_rms=0.548 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.849 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.849 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4797 robust_rms=0.359 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.454 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.454 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4797 robust_rms_before=1.073 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.373 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.359 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.466 worst_region_rms_after=0.454 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.053 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.454
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.466 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.466 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.373 arcsec matched=4797
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits N_match=4797 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=655 n_q2=904 n_q3=962 n_q4=2276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4797 N_valid=4797 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.113 bias_dec_arcsec=0.793 median_sep_arcsec=1.016 p95_sep_arcsec=2.007 n_q1=655 n_q2=904 n_q3=962 n_q4=2276 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-08-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0137.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_231018_TTUQ1b1x1_329127_Hn6isovf/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:44:54.81 +26:35:01.1: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:16.28 +32:38:14.4: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:49:32.31 +29:53:15.0: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:07:32.53 +26:11:39.6: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:16.28 +32:38:14.4: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:49:32.31 +29:53:15.0: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:44:54.81 +26:35:01.1: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:32.31 +29:53:15.0: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0176 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:54.81 +26:35:01.1: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4646 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:16.28 +32:38:14.4: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3493 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:07:32.53 +26:11:39.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:12:42.25 +34:06:00.4: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:12:42.25 +34:06:00.4: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:42.25 +34:06:00.4: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4725 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:11:02.12 +30:18:50.8: 13.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:36:19.46 +29:37:03.3: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:20:06.71 +32:46:10.8: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:30:35.34 +25:58:58.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:11:02.12 +30:18:50.8: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:01:54.43 +28:18:16.5: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:02.12 +30:18:50.8: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9675 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:36:19.46 +29:37:03.3: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:20:06.71 +32:46:10.8: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:49.98 +29:58:35.2: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:09:49.70 +29:48:27.4: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:30:35.34 +25:58:58.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:06.71 +32:46:10.8: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0402 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:07:11.51 +29:14:21.0: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:01:54.43 +28:18:16.5: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:54.43 +28:18:16.5: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1970 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:49.98 +29:58:35.2: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:49.98 +29:58:35.2: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3295 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:09:49.70 +29:48:27.4: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:49.70 +29:48:27.4: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2193 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:07:11.51 +29:14:21.0: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:11.51 +29:14:21.0: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4033 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151164.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151263.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151269.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151098_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151098_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151108_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151108_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:22.70 +28:31:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151110_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151110_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:49.09 +27:53:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151117_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151117_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:31.23 +33:17:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151120_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151120_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:03.11 +34:11:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151125_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151125_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:18.11 +31:47:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151127_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151127_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:31.65 +31:29:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151128_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151128_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151129_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151129_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.02 +26:11:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151130_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151130_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:31.33 +27:01:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151155_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151155_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.68 +34:09:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151160_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151160_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.44 +34:26:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151161_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151161_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:14.15 +28:37:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
Preparing report for the candidate 151164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.13 +34:07:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151174_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151174_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:18.05 +33:47:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151176_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151176_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:57.80 +33:05:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151178_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151178_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.35 +34:07:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151188_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151188_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:29.77 +32:42:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151195_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151195_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.84 +26:55:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151198_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151198_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:56.95 +33:06:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151215_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151215_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:46.55 +31:23:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151217_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151217_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151218_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151218_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151219_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151219_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.68 +34:23:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151221_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151221_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:18.64 +34:10:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151227_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151227_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:35.97 +34:06:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151228_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151228_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:44.49 +30:37:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151234_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151234_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:32.96 +28:37:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151236_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151236_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:25.52 +34:49:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151245_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151245_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.92 +26:25:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151249_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151249_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:22.00 +28:31:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151250_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151250_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.52 +33:11:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:55.10 +32:26:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151256_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151256_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:35.54 +34:07:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151257_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151257_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:26.48 +34:06:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151263_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
Preparing report for the candidate 151263_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151264_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151264_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151269_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
Preparing report for the candidate 151269_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151274_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151274_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:44.87 +31:09:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151276_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151276_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151280_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151280_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:19.82 +33:12:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151287_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151287_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:18.49 +33:12:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151291_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151291_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:27.54 +34:00:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151293_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151293_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151307_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151307_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:18.84 +29:47:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:41.91 +30:48:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151315_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151315_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151318_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151318_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151335_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151335_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151336_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151336_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:45.77 +30:29:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151341_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151341_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:42.18 +29:07:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:17.86 +33:11:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151381_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151381_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.18 +31:04:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151382_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 151382_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:47.89 +30:15:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144771_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 144771_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.24 +32:10:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128243_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 128243_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:51.41 +28:31:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76531_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 76531_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:37.66 +29:52:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.52 +28:42:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:11.40 +33:50:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.38 +34:08:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138
The candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_23-09-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138 did not pass the final checks