NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Boo-03-Q2b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Boo-03-Q2b1x1 reference image: Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits
Field Boo-03-Q2b1x1 reference image: Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Field Boo-03-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Field Boo-03-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Boo-03-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Boo-03-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Boo-03-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 572026 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 572026 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.png' -> 'transient_report/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits_preview.png'
Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits

renamed 'Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.png' -> 'transient_report/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits_preview.png'
Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 387.8712 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 479.8764 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4947.2312 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1565.3363 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 5463.5100 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1639.8636 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 12.7548 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.045 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 17.5499992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 18.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-21T21:52:39.0213535' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-22T02:52:39.0213535' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61335.1198960766 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-22T02:52:48.9274593' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61335.1200107289 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 233.99850009836 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9997482250468 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 18.7930555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 313.246388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.07777892993678 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Boo-03' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20674 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20674 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 17.5499992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 17.5499992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 74.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 906.5 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 346.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/d_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits :) Spent 0.815738 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/d_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 17.5200004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 18.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-21T21:55:59.2177955' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-22T02:55:59.2177955' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61335.1222131597 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-22T02:56:09.1200739' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61335.1223277776 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 233.998500229082 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9997484097352 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 18.2883333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 313.550555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.15803360131336 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Boo-03' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20701 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20701 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 17.5200004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 17.5200004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 74.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 906.5 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 346.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/d_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits :) Spent 0.844711 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/d_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits


fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461335.62001182 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:36:01.823 +45:59:16.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits Image size: 938.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:35:39.221 +45:59:18.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:36:01.823 +45:59:16.17 Second-epoch image center 15:35:39.221 +45:59:18.21 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0654 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits Image size: 938.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:35:37.750 +45:59:48.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:36:01.823 +45:59:16.17 Second-epoch image center 15:35:37.750 +45:59:48.69 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0703 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 15:35:39.221 +45:59:18.21 Second-epoch second image center 15:35:37.750 +45:59:48.69 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00948 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JjsqnsCxk1 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eHQQnq2tV7 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ViuVGBDzke Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KiPF9bCpzQ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits and wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits and wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits and wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7921 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 221.8203 to 246.3504 deg, Dec +40.2980 to +51.2487 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 221.8203 to 246.3504 deg, Dec 40.2980 to 51.2487 deg Loaded 5355 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4013 out of 4130 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4130 out of 7921 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.737600 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.737600 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.11 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7921 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 221.8203 to 246.3504 deg, Dec +40.2980 to +51.2487 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 221.8203 to 246.3504 deg, Dec 40.2980 to 51.2487 deg Loaded 5355 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4013 out of 4130 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4130 out of 7921 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits (aperture=6.3) Read 7913 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 221.8206 to 246.3503 deg, Dec +40.2697 to +51.2503 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 221.8206 to 246.3503 deg, Dec 40.2697 to 51.2503 deg Loaded 5370 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4021 out of 4130 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4130 out of 7913 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (aperture=6.3) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits 2.3 pix Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits 2.1 pix fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits 2.3 pix fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits 15.6 mag. Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits 13.9 mag. fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits 13.5 mag. fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 10.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.JjsqnsCxk1 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=407, bad_region=1731, passed=7921 Got 7921 stars (including 5855 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7921 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6555 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6555 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6555 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.350 n_q1=1628 n_q2=898 n_q3=1546 n_q4=827 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4899 N_valid=4899 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.023 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.264 p95_sep_arcsec=0.758 n_q1=1628 n_q2=898 n_q3=1546 n_q4=827 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits -region wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.eHQQnq2tV7 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=398, bad_region=1710, passed=7913 Got 7913 stars (including 5870 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7913 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6568 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6568 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6568 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=1632 n_q2=899 n_q3=1543 n_q4=833 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4907 N_valid=4907 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.009 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.007 median_sep_arcsec=0.253 p95_sep_arcsec=0.745 n_q1=1632 n_q2=899 n_q3=1543 n_q4=833 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -region wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.ViuVGBDzke (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=68, bad_region=14, passed=796 Got 796 stars (including 714 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 796 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.4 to 51.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 691 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 691 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 670 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 691 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 753 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.4 to 51.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 691 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 691 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 753 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 691 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 753 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 691 stars left (next iteration limit 760) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: the 691 catalog matches do not cover the frame (353/88/236/14 per quadrant, need 43 in each) - keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=691 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.526 n_q1=353 n_q2=88 n_q3=236 n_q4=14 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.280 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=691 N_valid=691 bias_ra_arcsec=0.274 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.067 median_sep_arcsec=0.499 p95_sep_arcsec=1.253 n_q1=353 n_q2=88 n_q3=236 n_q4=14 occupied_cells_4x4=13/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.KiPF9bCpzQ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=49, bad_region=32, passed=458 Got 458 stars (including 378 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 458 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013035 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010428 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 364 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 364 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 315 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 364 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 361 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 364 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 364 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 361 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 364 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 361 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 364 stars left (next iteration limit 400) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: the 364 catalog matches do not cover the frame (229/26/105/4 per quadrant, need 22 in each) - keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits N_match=364 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.647 sigma_q4_arcsec=NaN n_q1=229 n_q2=26 n_q3=105 n_q4=4 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.364 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=364 N_valid=364 bias_ra_arcsec=0.323 bias_dec_arcsec=0.024 median_sep_arcsec=0.545 p95_sep_arcsec=1.326 n_q1=229 n_q2=26 n_q3=105 n_q4=4 occupied_cells_4x4=12/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits sigma_overall=0.319 worst_q_ratio=1.097 ref2=Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits sigma_overall=0.316 worst_q_ratio=1.116 new1=fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits sigma_overall=0.411 worst_q_ratio=1.280 new2=fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits sigma_overall=0.474 worst_q_ratio=1.364 reference average sigma_overall=0.3175 worst_q_ratio=1.1065 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q1: 353 -> 229, 35.127% > 20%; fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits vs fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q2: 88 -> 26, 70.455% > 20%; fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits vs fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q3: 236 -> 105, 55.508% > 20%; fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits vs fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q4: 14 -> 4, 71.429% > 20%; fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits vs fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217_astrometric_residuals.png (4899 matched stars from wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218_astrometric_residuals.png (4907 matched stars from wcs_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138_astrometric_residuals.png (691 matched stars from wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139_astrometric_residuals.png (364 matched stars from wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Boo-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits Last image: 2461335.62001182 22.10.2026 02:52:39.021 UTC WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Boo-03-Q2b1x1 as too few input images were matched to the reference image - wrong pointing? clouds? very bad focus? Blind plate solve of the unmatched second-epoch image fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits to check the telescope pointing Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits .... Determining astrometry method... Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 1019 high-SNR stars for plate solving This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Reading input file 1 of 1: "out4014215.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out4014215.axy"... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10). log-odds ratio 71.4354 (1.05684e+31), 17 match, 0 conflict, 41 distractors, 93 index. RA,Dec = (233.951,46.0008), pixel scale 5.92657 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-----+-------++-+----+--+--+---+---++-+--+---++-+------+(best)-------------------+-----+-------------+-- Field 1: solved with index index-4114.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out4014215.solved to indicate this. Field: out4014215.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (233.916346, 45.989320) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:35:39.923, +45:59:21.552). Field size: 15.7557 x 10.5359 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 179.126 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. Opening FITS image file input.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_input.fits)... done! done! All done! Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run Reading input file 1 of 1: "out4014215.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out4014215.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.675 degrees of RA,Dec (233.915,45.9885) Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-100). log-odds ratio 35.461 (2.51476e+15), 10 match, 0 conflict, 27 distractors, 46 index. RA,Dec = (233.927,45.9903), pixel scale 5.94343 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+-+--+--++-------++----++-------+(best)-----------+------+-------------------------------------------- Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out4014215.solved to indicate this. Field: out4014215.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (233.914573, 45.989128) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:35:39.498, +45:59:20.860). Field size: 15.7306 x 10.5344 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 179.136 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. Opening FITS image file input.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_input.fits)... done! done! All done! Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... simplexy: found 4695 sources. Solving... Reading file "/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/out4014215_image_verify.I7QSJG/solution.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.5004, 951.91] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 97.3281 (1.85814e+42), 12 match, 0 conflict, 149 distractors, 12 index. RA,Dec = (233.916,45.99), pixel scale 5.96435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-----+---+-------+---------+------------------------+-------+------+----------+-+---+------------- --> log-odds 97.3281 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 168.46 (1.45027e+73), 19 match, 0 conflict, 142 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (233.916,45.99), pixel scale 5.96435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--+--+---+------++---------+--------------+---------+-------++-----+----------+-+---+-+----------- --> log-odds 168.46 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 424.199 (1.68757e+184), 41 match, 0 conflict, 120 distractors, 46 index. RA,Dec = (233.916,45.99), pixel scale 5.96435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-+-++--++-++---++---------+-----+++------++-+----+-+-------++-----+--++++----+-++--+-++---------- --> log-odds 424.199 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 809.216 (inf), 79 match, 0 conflict, 172 distractors, 94 index. RA,Dec = (233.916,45.99), pixel scale 5.96435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++-++--+++++---+++-+--+-+-+---+-+++--+-+-++-+--+++++++-+--++++--+-+-++++++---+++++-++++-+--+----- --> log-odds 809.216 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1522.08 (inf), 158 match, 0 conflict, 317 distractors, 193 index. RA,Dec = (233.916,45.99), pixel scale 5.96435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++-++--+++++--++++-+--+++++---+++++--+-+-++-+-+++++++++++++++++-+++-++++++--++++++++++++++-+--+-+ --> log-odds 1522.08 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 2616.59 (inf), 287 match, 0 conflict, 525 distractors, 373 index. RA,Dec = (233.916,45.99), pixel scale 5.96435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++-+++-+++++-+++++-+-++++++---+++++--+++-++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++-++++++++++++++++-++++ --> log-odds 2616.59 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 4501.97 (inf), 531 match, 1 conflict, 784 distractors, 728 index. RA,Dec = (233.916,45.99), pixel scale 5.96435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++-+++-+++++-+++++-+-++++++--++++++--+++-++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++-++++++++++++++++-++++ --> log-odds 4501.97 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 8122.82 (inf), 1023 match, 0 conflict, 1012 distractors, 1455 index. RA,Dec = (233.916,45.99), pixel scale 5.96435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++-+++-+++++-+++++-+-++++++--++++++--+++-++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++-++++++++++++++++-++++ --> log-odds 8122.82 Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.5004, 951.91] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 97.3281 (1.85814e+42), 12 match, 0 conflict, 149 distractors, 12 index. RA,Dec = (233.916,45.99), pixel scale 5.96435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-----+---+-------+---------+------------------------+-------+------+----------+-+---+------------- --> log-odds 97.3281 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 168.46 (1.45027e+73), 19 match, 0 conflict, 142 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (233.916,45.99), pixel scale 5.96435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--+--+---+------++---------+--------------+---------+-------++-----+----------+-+---+-+----------- --> log-odds 168.46 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 424.199 (1.68757e+184), 41 match, 0 conflict, 120 distractors, 46 index. RA,Dec = (233.916,45.99), pixel scale 5.96435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-+-++--++-++---++---------+-----+++------++-+----+-+-------++-----+--++++----+-++--+-++---------- --> log-odds 424.199 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 809.216 (inf), 79 match, 0 conflict, 172 distractors, 94 index. RA,Dec = (233.916,45.99), pixel scale 5.96435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++-++--+++++---+++-+--+-+-+---+-+++--+-+-++-+--+++++++-+--++++--+-+-++++++---+++++-++++-+--+----- --> log-odds 809.216 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1522.08 (inf), 158 match, 0 conflict, 317 distractors, 193 index. RA,Dec = (233.916,45.99), pixel scale 5.96435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++-++--+++++--++++-+--+++++---+++++--+-+-++-+-+++++++++++++++++-+++-++++++--++++++++++++++-+--+-+ --> log-odds 1522.08 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 2616.59 (inf), 287 match, 0 conflict, 525 distractors, 373 index. RA,Dec = (233.916,45.99), pixel scale 5.96435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++-+++-+++++-+++++-+-++++++---+++++--+++-++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++-++++++++++++++++-++++ --> log-odds 2616.59 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 4501.97 (inf), 531 match, 1 conflict, 784 distractors, 728 index. RA,Dec = (233.916,45.99), pixel scale 5.96435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++-+++-+++++-+++++-+-++++++--++++++--+++-++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++-++++++++++++++++-++++ --> log-odds 4501.97 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 8122.82 (inf), 1023 match, 0 conflict, 1012 distractors, 1455 index. RA,Dec = (233.916,45.99), pixel scale 5.96435 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++-+++-+++++-+++++-+-++++++--++++++--+++-++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++-++++++++++++++++-++++ --> log-odds 8122.82 Got 16 solutions. Field: wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (233.914596, 45.989232) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:35:39.503, +45:59:21.236). Field size: 15.7322 x 10.5335 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 179.128 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/out4014215_image_verify.I7QSJG/solution.new"... renamed '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/out4014215_image_verify.I7QSJG/solution.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits Generating wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits Image size: 938.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:35:39.221 +45:59:18.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 6200 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_4047683.cat.log' 'wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.xy2sky.JFVdJP' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_4047683.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the blindly solved unmatched second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:36:01.823 +45:59:16.17 Second-epoch image center 15:35:39.221 +45:59:18.21 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0654 deg. ################################### The second-epoch image center is consistent with the reference image center (offset 0.0654 deg.) - the star matching failure is probably not a pointing problem ____ VaST output ____ --==VaST 1.0rc90==-- Parsing command line arguments... opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius! opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching! opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source! opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted! opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope) opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag! WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars. opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done! opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually! opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored! INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ... Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found. This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file. Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p)... OK Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files. Done with cleaning! VaST was started with the following command line: ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits Preparing to process 4 input FITS images... ######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ######## transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search! transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search! transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!! transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3 transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars transient search mode: not discarding large sources ################ Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix We have 4 images to process. SExtractor catalog cache: restored Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits catalog from cache SExtractor catalog cache: restored Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits catalog from cache Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads... Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user Parent process says: we are done fork()ing. Waiting for thread 2 to finish... autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.7,4.7,4.2,5.1,5.6,6.1 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.6,4.6,4.2,5.1,5.6,6.0 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits Waiting for thread 1 to finish... Done with SExtractor! TIMING SExtractor: 6 seconds Matching stars between images! No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine. Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-08T06:47:07.8593964 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-08T06:47:07.8593964 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-06-08T06:47:07.859 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits Exposure 20 sec, 08.06.2026 06:47:07.859 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461199.78284559 mid. exp. The reference image star 8515.970 22.566 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8489.101 15.665 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8295.787 16.787 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9400.287 13.107 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7629.596 10.299 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8743.492 7.818 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9356.586 2.223 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7888.780 3.962 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7775.357 3.716 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7627.887 2.179 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more reference image stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 35018, (35018 good for image matching) * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 13 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 6353 * rejected close to frame edge: 139 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.9 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 56 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied. get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -6.82 Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -6.8 (4.0 sigma detection) The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.4 80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -7.6 Selected detection limit= -7.6 Final detection limit= -7.6 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0) Parameter box for transient search: 10.05.0 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 70 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 34855 * detected, using 497/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.015535, number_of_ambiguous_matches=544 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=1 pairs=32396 inliers=32396 rms 0.52 -> 0.52 pix, max corner correction 0.1 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.014364, number_of_ambiguous_matches=503 32394 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=32394 inliers=32394 rms 0.50 -> 0.50 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.008738, number_of_ambiguous_matches=306 32346 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=32346 inliers=32346 rms 0.37 -> 0.37 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.003313, number_of_ambiguous_matches=116 32301 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = -0.004 34855 stars detected, 32301 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 30918, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 30918 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 30917 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00000*X_pix -0.00000*Y_pix -0.00243 Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)... Computing robust linear magnitude calibration. Used 28923 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -6.84 37572 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) Magnitude calibration is performed successfully! Saving observations to the cache... OK memory: 217520 kB used, 258068 kB peak, 65261732 kB available RAM processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-22T02:52:39.0213535 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-22T02:52:39.0213535 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-10-22T02:52:39.021 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits The star 8108.188 16.084 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7980.893 127.182 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7930.998 136.615 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8128.358 153.890 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7862.747 169.406 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7556.421 195.858 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8298.813 199.898 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8869.006 243.049 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7946.503 266.343 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7638.838 368.354 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 6089 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 1 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 70 * rejected close to frame edge: 30 * rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.6 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 10 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 6089 * detected, using 100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000080, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=5991 inliers=5991 rms 0.69 -> 0.37 pix, max corner correction 7.9 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000080, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3 5990 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=5990 inliers=5990 rms 0.35 -> 0.35 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000080, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3 5986 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=5986 inliers=5986 rms 0.27 -> 0.27 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000027, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1 5981 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 1.161 6089 stars detected, 5981 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 5466, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 5466 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 4410 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00017*X_pix +0.00006*Y_pix -0.44994 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 4410 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.99  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  37572 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) memory: 216700 kB used, 258068 kB peak, 65261732 kB available RAM processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-22T02:55:59.2177955 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-22T02:55:59.2177955 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-10-22T02:55:59.217 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits The star 9144.000 307.996 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8055.001 580.999 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8609.492 677.445 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8142.662 1010.042 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9359.457 1118.120 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8842.972 1331.983 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8208.998 1399.995 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8635.479 1433.545 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9052.791 1534.803 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 1123.006 1550.998 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 3781 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 149 * rejected close to frame edge: 32 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.7 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 13 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 3781 * detected, using 100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000106, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=3690 inliers=3690 rms 0.92 -> 0.37 pix, max corner correction 13.4 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000106, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4 3690 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=3690 inliers=3690 rms 0.34 -> 0.34 pix, max corner correction 0.1 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000080, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3 3688 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=3688 inliers=3688 rms 0.26 -> 0.26 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000027, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1 3685 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 1.171 3781 stars detected, 3685 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 3292, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 3292 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 2562 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00029*X_pix +0.00012*Y_pix -0.78076 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 2562 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -8.10  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  37572 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) memory: 216700 kB used, 258068 kB peak, 65261732 kB available RAM processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%) TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds Done with measurements! =) Total number of measurements 69873 (69873 measurements stored in RAM) Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory... Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files... TIMING lightcurve_write: 2 seconds The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory... Creating vast_image_details.log ... Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK Selecting the best aperture for each source Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 5666 stars Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 8908 stars Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 4902 stars Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 5062 stars Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 7763 stars done! =) TIMING select_aperture: 4 seconds Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make' Computing, please wait a bit ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 32140 objects, the longest string is 385 bytes. Allocating memory for resorting the file. ----***** VaST processing WARNING *****---- You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one. Please investigate this! ************************************************************** This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic messages printed above (or the vast*.log files): * How many of the input images are matched? * Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable? * Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent? You may run ./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings (star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration file, see various examples in the VaST directory). If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/ ************************************************************** Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1) _____________________ ERROR running VaST on the field Boo-03-Q2b1x1 (less than 4 images processed) exp_start= 08.06.2026 06:47:07.859 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461199.78284559 ap= 4.9 rotation= 0.000 *detected= 35018 *matched= 35018 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0217.fits exp_start= 08.06.2026 06:47:49.560 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461199.78332824 ap= 5.0 rotation= -0.004 *detected= 34855 *matched= 32301 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-47-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits exp_start= 22.10.2026 02:52:39.021 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461335.62001182 ap= 4.6 rotation= 1.161 *detected= 6089 *matched= 5981 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-52-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0138.fits exp_start= 22.10.2026 02:55:59.217 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461335.62232890 ap= 4.7 rotation= 1.171 *detected= 3781 *matched= 3685 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_222105_TTUQ2b1x1_3649662_qt3AaA0p/fd_Boo-03-Q2b1x1_2026-10-21_21-55-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits ########### Completed Boo-03-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461335.62001182 -observatory V36 15:07:51.11 -20:50:59.1 Mercury (0.3mag) 13:47:50.36 -18:26:01.3 Venus (-4.3mag) 09:04:01.29 +18:13:04.2 Mars (1.0mag) 09:40:50.20 +14:35:18.2 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:39:27.55 +01:18:29.5 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:10:48.84 +20:54:43.8 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:09:20.44 -00:32:00.6 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:11.11 -23:43:02.3 Pluto (14.5mag) 22:34:48.95 -08:42:30.0 Moon (-11.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 21 22:23 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461335.62001182: 09:40:44.16 +14:35:52.9 Io (6.1mag) 09:41:00.46 +14:34:20.7 Europa (6.2mag) 09:40:36.77 +14:36:34.9 Ganymede (5.5mag) 09:40:56.25 +14:34:46.7 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:41:23.26 +14:51:50.2 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:40:47.52 +14:35:32.9 Thebe (16.4mag) 09:39:56.07 +14:59:02.6 Elara (17.5mag) 09:42:32.98 +13:59:28.7 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:38:41.11 +15:04:53.9 Carme (18.8mag) 00:39:36.55 +01:18:30.8 Titan (8.2mag) 00:39:20.67 +01:18:28.6 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:39:26.11 +01:16:38.0 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:39:43.31 +01:18:13.8 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:37:42.70 +01:06:04.6 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 21 22:23 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461335.62001182: 03:48:53.82 +20:03:25.9 JWST 17:22:13.07 +37:56:06.1 Chandra 04:55:50.64 +47:25:23.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 21 22:23 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461335.62001182 -observatory V36 03:41:40.08 +20:09:38.1 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:41:36.40 +37:33:40.2 18.0mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill) 07:41:41.42 +37:33:27.6 18.0mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 07:41:02.31 +37:33:39.9 18.0mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill) 05:02:26.59 +40:52:34.9 18.0mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski) 18:34:56.25 -33:13:39.7 14.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:43:21.65 -73:06:34.3 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:14:16.06 +34:57:43.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:41:00.53 +48:11:29.0 17.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 07:33:38.23 +25:22:25.9 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:06:08.94 +36:53:35.7 16.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:30:14.52 +41:07:14.6 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:45:51.07 -13:39:59.3 16.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:37:34.22 +15:07:22.4 16.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 14:02:02.79 -03:36:28.0 16.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 19:26:37.18 +60:18:53.6 15.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:23:57.04 +41:33:23.6 18.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:55:56.92 +15:25:09.4 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:24:02.11 -52:04:58.5 13.6mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 19:22:49.88 -05:06:05.7 16.6mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS) 23:59:35.71 +17:02:48.2 17.2mag 2P/Encke 23:10:41.55 -29:07:02.2 14.9mag 10P/Tempel 02:25:05.12 +36:00:27.7 16.5mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:18:20.00 -09:02:20.5 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:16:07.01 -09:04:43.7 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 07:48:46.56 +14:51:41.0 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 02:48:30.55 +13:46:00.8 17.8mag 88P/Howell 08:17:41.97 +43:06:42.7 17.0mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:26:35.29 +10:13:39.5 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 12:02:45.48 +10:48:38.0 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 14:34:14.62 -35:07:40.9 18.0mag 124P/Mrkos 20:30:00.97 +10:10:31.4 9.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:44:46.10 -00:44:15.9 15.2mag 169P/NEAT 03:21:54.28 +03:19:03.4 15.0mag 220P/McNaught 06:16:35.27 +47:28:11.0 15.5mag 260P/McNaught 07:42:19.10 +25:20:38.9 17.7mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Oct 21 22:23 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm VIZIER 01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl ------- 18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl ------- 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif ------- 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl VIZIER 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj VIZIER 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv ------- 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc ------- 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa ------- 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg VIZIER 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs ------- 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs ------- 00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv ------- 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh ------- 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi ------- 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs ------- 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars ------- 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh ------- 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc VIZIER 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw ------- 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj ------- 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv ------- 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa VIZIER 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 ------- 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez VIZIER 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo ------- 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy ------- 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid ------- 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn ------- 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib ------- 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew VIZIER 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv ------- 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau ------- 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo ------- 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy ------- 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek ------- 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev VIZIER 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm ------- 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er VIZIER 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep VIZIER 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et VIZIER 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk ------- 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu VIZIER 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo VIZIER 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej VIZIER 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek VIZIER 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei VIZIER 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb ------- 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh VIZIER 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le ------- 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb ------- 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil ------- 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee VIZIER 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu ------- 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg ------- 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea VIZIER 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb VIZIER 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp ------- 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz VIZIER -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 9.3K Oct 21 22:23 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag 05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag 05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 21 22:23 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 01:10:49.770 +02:38:30.67 AT 2026aebt 2026-09-30.66 21.23 01:05:19.330 -00:11:32.74 AT 2026aebs 2026-09-30.65 21.65 01:35:09.144 -01:03:49.94 AT 2026aebr 2026-09-20.83 23.01 01:02:37.840 +04:28:02.19 AT 2026aebq 2026-09-20.82 22.78 01:28:12.190 +05:17:51.61 AT 2026aebp 2026-09-13.85 22.41 22:47:15.050 +03:42:02.27 AT 2026aebo 2026-09-21.73 22.04 23:45:08.040 +01:05:55.47 AT 2026aebn 2026-09-30.76 21.95 23:25:27.380 -00:44:47.15 AT 2026aebm 2026-09-15.74 22.29 00:43:52.136 -04:09:35.26 SN 2026aebl 2026-09-20.33 20.4818 23:57:05.580 +47:22:43.66 AT 2026aebk 2026-10-02.25 20.1485 21:45:41.050 -07:03:45.02 SN 2026aebj 2026-10-02.17 19.9213 01:27:33.024 +84:50:25.70 AT 2026aebi 2026-10-03.20 19.7953 00:26:39.140 -03:17:00.58 AT 2026aebh 2026-10-02.27 20.1095 21:28:41.378 +03:57:48.01 SN 2026aebg 2026-10-01.26 20.3099 00:57:54.471 -27:53:53.62 AT 2026aebf 2026-09-30.33 19.3916 22:47:58.650 +03:51:05.09 AT 2026aebe 2026-09-30.23 20.1921 23:27:00.498 -10:43:55.07 AT 2026aebd 2026-10-01.39 20.03 23:40:24.092 -09:27:20.60 AT 2026aebc 2026-10-01.39 20.07 00:56:09.593 -01:35:47.87 AT 2026aebb 2026-10-01.40 20.95 01:31:39.979 -01:39:43.87 AT 2026aeba 2026-10-01.46 21.45 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 21 22:23 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 89 C