This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3835* 04 10 53.15 +20 54 57.8 7.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8835,7.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3835 7.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3835 2461334.8835 11.60 03:34:05.40 +21:16:47.8
166.18848 -27.61883 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.64 Angelina -1 -1 1 11.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:05.40 +21:16:47.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:05.40 +21:16:47.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3835* 03 34 05.40 +21 16 47.8 11.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8835,11.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3835 11.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3835 2461334.8835 14.56 04:13:53.95 +24:33:41.2
170.92571 -18.91000 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.341 California 0 -0 0 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:13:53.95 +24:33:41.2: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:13:53.95 +24:33:41.2: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3835* 04 13 53.95 +24 33 41.2 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8835,14.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3835 14.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3835* 04 10 53.15 +20 54 57.9 7.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8835,7.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3835 7.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3835 2461334.8835 12.54 04:05:42.16 +17:31:38.4
175.07064 -25.10548 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato 0 0 0 12.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:05:42.16 +17:31:38.4: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:05:42.16 +17:31:38.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3835* 04 05 42.16 +17 31 38.4 12.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8835,12.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3835 12.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3835 2461334.8835 12.71 04:05:34.49 +23:50:26.0
170.07775 -20.77723 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.83 Beatrix -0 -0 0 12.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:05:34.49 +23:50:26.0: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:05:34.49 +23:50:26.0: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3835* 04 05 34.49 +23 50 26.0 12.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8835,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3835 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3835 2461334.8835 13.45 04:09:52.32 +23:41:56.7
170.91688 -20.17008 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.162 Laurentia 0 0 0 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:09:52.32 +23:41:56.7: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:09:52.32 +23:41:56.7: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3835* 04 09 52.32 +23 41 56.7 13.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8835,13.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3835 13.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3835 2461334.8835 13.56 03:41:31.17 +17:01:47.3
170.92539 -29.58067 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.131 Vala -1 -0 1 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:41:31.17 +17:01:47.3: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:41:31.17 +17:01:47.3: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3835* 03 41 31.17 +17 01 47.3 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8835,13.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3835 13.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3835 2461334.8835 13.84 03:18:16.67 +23:24:30.4
161.45630 -28.26833 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.830 Petropolitana -0 -0 0 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:18:16.67 +23:24:30.4: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:18:16.67 +23:24:30.4: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3835* 03 18 16.67 +23 24 30.4 13.8 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8835,13.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3835 13.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3835 2461334.8835 13.76 03:18:10.52 +18:26:13.8
164.97983 -32.19959 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.586 Thekla -0 -0 0 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:18:10.52 +18:26:13.8: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:18:10.52 +18:26:13.8: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3835* 03 18 10.52 +18 26 13.8 13.8 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8835,13.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3835 13.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3835 2461334.8835 14.07 03:39:50.90 +23:58:31.3
165.33747 -24.71242 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.859 Bouzareah 0 1 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:39:50.90 +23:58:31.3: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:39:50.90 +23:58:31.3: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3835* 03 39 50.90 +23 58 31.3 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8835,14.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3835 14.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3835 2461334.8835 14.31 03:39:58.57 +24:34:24.6
164.93062 -24.24177 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.228 Agathe -0 -0 0 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:39:58.57 +24:34:24.6: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:39:58.57 +24:34:24.6: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3835* 03 39 58.57 +24 34 24.6 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8835,14.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3835 14.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3835 2461334.8835 14.57 03:28:52.32 +19:09:37.6
166.71055 -30.02326 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.310 Margarita -1 -1 1 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:28:52.32 +19:09:37.6: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:28:52.32 +19:09:37.6: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3835* 03 28 52.32 +19 09 37.6 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8835,14.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3835 14.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3835 2461334.8835 14.87 03:49:03.05 +18:43:54.2
171.04301 -27.11159 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1576 Fabiola -0 1 1 15.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:03.05 +18:43:54.2: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:03.05 +18:43:54.2: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3835* 03 49 03.05 +18 43 54.2 14.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8835,14.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3835 14.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3835 2461334.8835 14.87 03:16:22.69 +19:54:34.3
163.51193 -31.31071 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1879 Broederstroom -2 -1 2 15.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:16:22.69 +19:54:34.3: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:16:22.69 +19:54:34.3: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3835* 03 16 22.69 +19 54 34.3 14.9 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8835,14.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3835 14.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.3835 2461334.8835 14.97 03:30:13.09 +26:44:52.5
161.55562 -23.97295 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.711 Marmulla 1 0 1 15.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:13.09 +26:44:52.5: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:13.09 +26:44:52.5: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.3835* 03 30 13.09 +26 44 52.5 15.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.8835,14.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.3835 14.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461334.88380978 21.10.2026 09:12:31.165 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11408
Objects passed selection criteria: 11405
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10914
Average stars matched: 10643 (97.517 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236648 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 21 04:16:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461334.88380978 21.10.2026 09:12:31.165 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 191
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.97
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 73219
Objects passed selection criteria: 72987
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 70441.5
Average stars matched: 67280 (95.5119 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 523236 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Oct 21 04:17:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461334.88321483
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:27.000 +21:59:56.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:27.000 +21:59:56.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0243 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:24.496 +21:59:35.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:24.496 +21:59:35.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0343 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:27.000 +21:59:56.38
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:24.496 +21:59:35.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01133 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9S0fayDVhx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zIKktSU3Df
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kOIkQr3khE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1uEeeOhE8S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.5175 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.5175 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4761 out of 5130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5130 out of 11315 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.9S0fayDVhx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=882, bad_region=0, passed=11324
Got 11324 stars (including 10422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1548 n_q2=1222 n_q3=1071 n_q4=1082 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4923 N_valid=4923 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.010 median_sep_arcsec=0.245 p95_sep_arcsec=0.865 n_q1=1548 n_q2=1222 n_q3=1071 n_q4=1082 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zIKktSU3Df (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=893, bad_region=0, passed=11315
Got 11315 stars (including 10408 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=1546 n_q2=1221 n_q3=1073 n_q4=1081 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.338
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4921 N_valid=4921 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.014 median_sep_arcsec=0.252 p95_sep_arcsec=0.870 n_q1=1546 n_q2=1221 n_q3=1073 n_q4=1081 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kOIkQr3khE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=841, bad_region=0, passed=10615
Got 10615 stars (including 9761 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10615 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10615 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10615 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10615 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=12.242 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.280 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.280 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=0.574 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.776 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.776 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=0.346 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.418 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.335 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4921 robust_rms_before=1.198 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.353 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.346 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.433 worst_region_rms_after=0.418 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.156 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.335
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.433 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.433 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.353 arcsec matched=4921
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=1586 n_q2=1184 n_q3=1089 n_q4=1062 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4921 N_valid=4921 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.484 bias_dec_arcsec=0.710 median_sep_arcsec=1.130 p95_sep_arcsec=1.956 n_q1=1586 n_q2=1184 n_q3=1089 n_q4=1062 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.1uEeeOhE8S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=860, bad_region=0, passed=10632
Got 10632 stars (including 9758 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10632 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=12.300 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.370 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.370 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=0.589 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.752 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.752 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=0.348 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.424 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.338 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4921 robust_rms_before=1.205 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.358 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.348 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.426 worst_region_rms_after=0.424 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.178 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.338
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.426 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.426 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.358 arcsec matched=4921
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1581 n_q2=1179 n_q3=1096 n_q4=1065 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4921 N_valid=4921 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.501 bias_dec_arcsec=0.699 median_sep_arcsec=1.120 p95_sep_arcsec=1.999 n_q1=1581 n_q2=1179 n_q3=1096 n_q4=1065 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.278
ref2=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.338
new1=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.169
new2=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits sigma_overall=0.356 worst_q_ratio=1.147
reference average sigma_overall=0.3005 worst_q_ratio=1.308
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (4923 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_astrometric_residuals.png (4921 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374_astrometric_residuals.png (4921 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375_astrometric_residuals.png (4921 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-11-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0374.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041357_TTUQ1b1x1_3096674_toAPyOsp/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:05.40 +21:16:47.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:42:42.39 +26:53:58.1: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:13.15 +22:06:37.2: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:03.95 +22:50:50.3: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:27.67 +21:56:43.3: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:43.10 +22:39:48.4: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:13.15 +22:06:37.2: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:03.95 +22:50:50.3: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:42:42.39 +26:53:58.1: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:27.67 +21:56:43.3: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:05.40 +21:16:47.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:03.95 +22:50:50.3: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3592 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:13.15 +22:06:37.2: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2860 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:42.39 +26:53:58.1: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3948 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:27.67 +21:56:43.3: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3860 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:43.10 +22:39:48.4: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:43.10 +22:39:48.4: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4360 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20644.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20582_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 20582_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20583_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
Preparing report for the candidate 20583_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20617_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 20617_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:09.77 +24:29:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20631_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 20631_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.59 +24:42:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20644_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
Preparing report for the candidate 20644_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20668_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 20668_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:04.83 +25:42:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20675_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 20675_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:34.53 +19:39:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20683_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 20683_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20685_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 20685_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20686_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 20686_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20694_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 20694_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87041_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87041_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87057_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87057_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87059_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87059_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87063_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87063_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87064_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87064_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87065_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87065_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87071_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87071_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87072_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87072_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87073_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87073_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87074_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87074_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87076_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87076_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87078_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87078_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87079_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87079_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87081_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87081_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87091_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87091_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87096_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87096_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87098_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87098_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87101_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87101_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87102_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87102_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87103_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87103_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87106_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
Preparing report for the candidate 87106_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87108_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87108_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87112_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87112_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87113_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87113_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87116_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87116_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87117_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87117_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87120_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87120_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87122_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87122_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87129_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87129_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87130_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87130_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87132_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87132_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87133_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87133_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87134_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87134_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87135_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87135_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87136_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87136_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:15:57.84 +18:58:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87138_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87138_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87140_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87140_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:56.90 +25:06:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87146_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87146_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:46.39 +17:48:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87148_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87148_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87149_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87149_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:01.93 +18:05:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87157_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87157_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:03:57.08 +25:51:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87159_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87159_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:26:07.76 +25:49:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87160_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87160_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87161_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87161_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:55.70 +25:00:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87165_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87165_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87167_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87167_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87170_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87170_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:25:43.79 +17:25:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87172_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87172_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87173_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
Preparing report for the candidate 87173_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87226_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87226_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.59 +24:42:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87238_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87238_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:05.41 +21:16:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87239_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87239_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:23.16 +24:32:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87294_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87294_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87321_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
Preparing report for the candidate 87321_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87331_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87331_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:07.49 +24:00:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87349_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
Preparing report for the candidate 87349_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87381_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87381_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87417_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87417_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87460_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87460_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:08.47 +23:20:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87482_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87482_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87493_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87493_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87509_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87509_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87547_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
Preparing report for the candidate 87547_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87562_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87562_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:12.51 +26:35:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87572_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87572_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87598_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87598_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87629_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87629_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87639_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87639_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:00.72 +19:54:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87662_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
Preparing report for the candidate 87662_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87675_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87675_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:42.09 +26:21:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87697_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87697_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87700_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87700_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87765_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
Preparing report for the candidate 87765_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87768_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
Preparing report for the candidate 87768_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87786_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87786_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87796_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87796_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87800_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87800_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87823_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87823_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87844_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87844_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87857_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
Preparing report for the candidate 87857_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87876_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87876_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87893_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87893_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:06.96 +26:34:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87932_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87932_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87941_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87941_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87977_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87977_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87987_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 87987_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:18.70 +25:05:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88018_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
Preparing report for the candidate 88018_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88036_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88036_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88054_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88054_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:18.23 +26:26:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88055_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88055_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:25:11.72 +19:50:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88068_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88068_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88087_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88087_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88092_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88092_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88110_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88110_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:51.42 +24:18:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88173_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88173_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:26:46.94 +23:41:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88175_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
Preparing report for the candidate 88175_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88178_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88178_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:09:31.60 +26:42:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88179_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88179_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88193_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88193_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88272_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88272_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88273_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88273_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88281_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88281_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88283_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88283_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88319_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88319_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88329_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88329_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88333_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88333_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88342_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88342_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88355_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88355_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88373_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88373_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88374_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88374_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88382_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88382_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88383_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88383_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88390_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88390_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88393_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88393_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88406_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88406_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88411_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88411_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88417_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88417_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88421_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88421_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88426_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88426_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88428_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88428_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88429_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88429_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88452_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
Preparing report for the candidate 88452_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88462_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88462_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88467_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88467_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88480_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88480_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88486_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88486_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88492_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88492_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88496_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88496_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88497_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88497_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88499_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88499_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88500_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88500_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88501_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88501_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88504_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88504_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88507_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88507_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88512_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88512_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88519_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88519_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88520_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88520_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88526_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88526_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88527_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88527_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88541_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88541_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88543_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88543_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88551_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88551_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88552_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88552_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88556_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88556_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88560_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88560_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88569_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88569_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88575_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88575_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88578_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88578_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88580_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
Preparing report for the candidate 88580_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88599_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88599_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88602_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88602_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88603_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88603_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88605_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88605_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88616_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88616_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88624_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88624_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88632_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88632_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88633_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88633_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88635_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88635_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88636_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88636_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88638_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
Preparing report for the candidate 88638_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88641_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88641_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88651_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88651_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88672_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88672_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88681_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88681_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88682_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88682_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88692_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88692_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88708_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88708_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88715_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88715_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88745_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88745_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88746_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88746_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88783_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88783_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88819_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375
The candidate 88819_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_04-12-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0375 did not pass the final checks
