fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 21.25188 | 2461334.75188 | 12.40 | 01:18:08.93 -14:08:13.6 | 0470 5304 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 21.25234 | 2461334.75234 | 12.46 | 01:18:08.89 -14:08:14.4 | 0470 5303 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.2521 2461334.7521 12.43 01:18:08.91 -14:08:14.0
149.88047 -75.59249 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
166 Rhodope -0 0 0 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:18:08.91 -14:08:14.0: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:18:08.91 -14:08:14.0: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242 STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Cet-11-Q1b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Cet-11-Q1b1x1 ########### Processing Cet-11-Q1b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 785711 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 785711 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits_preview.png'
Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
renamed 'Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits_preview.png'
Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1654.6390 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 511.5033 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2449.6492 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 654.9571 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2449.0474 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 654.6237 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.48047 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 15.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-21T01:02:32.3088869' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-21T06:02:32.3088869' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61334.2517628241 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-21T06:02:42.2107872' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61334.2518774304 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 26.6659963114283 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9995249103196 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 37.7519444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 169.713333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.63072901421485 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '01 46 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29491 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29491 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 78.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 906.2 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 15.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.50052 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/d_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits :) Spent 0.507330 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/d_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 15.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-21T01:03:11.8240569' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-21T06:03:11.8240569' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61334.252220185 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-21T06:03:21.7249640' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61334.2523347684 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 26.6659963023899 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9995248928833 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 37.7763888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 169.911666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.629835654983 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '01 46 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29491 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29491 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 78.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 906.2 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 15.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.50052 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/d_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits :) Spent 0.527281 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/d_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461334.75187856 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits Image size: 940.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 01:46:54.411 -17:59:57.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65 Second-epoch image center 01:46:54.411 -17:59:57.12 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0564 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Image size: 940.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 01:46:54.258 -17:59:54.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65 Second-epoch image center 01:46:54.258 -17:59:54.56 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0558 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 01:46:54.411 -17:59:57.12 Second-epoch second image center 01:46:54.258 -17:59:54.56 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00093 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00093 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KsQraP4e0K Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QTvMSN3cHU Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QxK0qdknpo Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NpkBFCJoR0 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 3748 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.1303 to 35.1139 deg, Dec -23.2882 to -12.6120 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.1303 to 35.1139 deg, Dec -23.2882 to -12.6120 deg Loaded 4115 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2743 out of 2866 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2866 out of 3748 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.870000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.870000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 3748 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.1303 to 35.1139 deg, Dec -23.2882 to -12.6120 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.1303 to 35.1139 deg, Dec -23.2882 to -12.6120 deg Loaded 4115 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2743 out of 2866 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2866 out of 3748 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (aperture=6.4) Read 4329 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.3267 to 35.1802 deg, Dec -23.3270 to -12.4424 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.3267 to 35.1802 deg, Dec -23.3270 to -12.4424 deg Loaded 4183 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3033 out of 3123 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3123 out of 4329 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits (aperture=5.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 2.1 pix Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits 4.0 pix fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits 3.9 pix fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.9 mag. Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 15.2 mag. Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits 14.5 mag. fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits 14.5 mag. fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.KsQraP4e0K (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=374, bad_region=0, passed=3748 Got 3748 stars (including 3370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3748 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3308 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3308 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3308 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3308 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3748 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3308 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3308 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3748 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3308 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3748 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 3308 stars left (next iteration limit 3638) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits N_match=3308 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=748 n_q2=870 n_q3=779 n_q4=911 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.206 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3308 N_valid=3308 bias_ra_arcsec=0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.294 p95_sep_arcsec=0.786 n_q1=748 n_q2=870 n_q3=779 n_q4=911 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.QTvMSN3cHU (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=326, bad_region=0, passed=4329 Got 4329 stars (including 3994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4329 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3908 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4329 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4329 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4329 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 3908 stars left (next iteration limit 4298) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits N_match=3908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=929 n_q2=998 n_q3=973 n_q4=1008 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.327 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3908 N_valid=3908 bias_ra_arcsec=0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.226 p95_sep_arcsec=0.630 n_q1=929 n_q2=998 n_q3=973 n_q4=1008 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits -region wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.QxK0qdknpo (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=188, bad_region=1, passed=3640 Got 3640 stars (including 3448 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3640 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3383 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3383 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3383 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3383 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3640 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3383 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3383 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3640 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3383 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3640 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 3383 stars left (next iteration limit 3721) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3383 robust_rms=13.745 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.327 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.327 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3383 robust_rms=0.458 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.703 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.703 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3383 robust_rms=0.333 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.471 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.471 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3383 robust_rms_before=0.917 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.320 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.333 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.484 worst_region_rms_after=0.471 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.122 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.471 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.484 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.484 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.320 arcsec matched=3383 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits N_match=3383 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=751 n_q2=799 n_q3=918 n_q4=915 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.273 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3383 N_valid=3383 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.235 bias_dec_arcsec=0.400 median_sep_arcsec=0.818 p95_sep_arcsec=1.677 n_q1=751 n_q2=799 n_q3=918 n_q4=915 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.NpkBFCJoR0 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=184, bad_region=1, passed=3618 Got 3618 stars (including 3430 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3618 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3369 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3369 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3369 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3369 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3618 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3369 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3369 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3618 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3369 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3618 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 3369 stars left (next iteration limit 3705) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3369 robust_rms=13.662 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.778 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.778 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3369 robust_rms=0.440 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.663 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.663 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3369 robust_rms=0.333 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.469 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.469 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3369 robust_rms_before=0.912 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.313 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.333 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.461 worst_region_rms_after=0.469 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.105 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.469 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.461 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.461 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.313 arcsec matched=3369 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits N_match=3369 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.249 n_q1=753 n_q2=786 n_q3=915 n_q4=915 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.213 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3369 N_valid=3369 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.247 bias_dec_arcsec=0.435 median_sep_arcsec=0.823 p95_sep_arcsec=1.664 n_q1=753 n_q2=786 n_q3=915 n_q4=915 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.206 ref2=Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits sigma_overall=0.261 worst_q_ratio=1.327 new1=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits sigma_overall=0.312 worst_q_ratio=1.273 new2=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits sigma_overall=0.304 worst_q_ratio=1.213 reference average sigma_overall=0.312 worst_q_ratio=1.2665 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028_astrometric_residuals.png (3308 matched stars from wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086_astrometric_residuals.png (3908 matched stars from wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196_astrometric_residuals.png (3383 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197_astrometric_residuals.png (3369 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits Image size: 940.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 01:46:54.411 -17:59:57.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65 Second-epoch image center 01:46:54.411 -17:59:57.12 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0564 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Image size: 940.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 01:46:54.258 -17:59:54.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65 Second-epoch image center 01:46:54.258 -17:59:54.56 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0558 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 01:46:54.411 -17:59:57.12 Second-epoch second image center 01:46:54.258 -17:59:54.56 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00093 deg. ################################### ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00093 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.) Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4BOee8oL5S Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WMlUOqNwu1 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d8fTDlBNzc Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vX4BZphnkc Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 21033 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.1142 to 35.1618 deg, Dec -23.2881 to -12.5807 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.1142 to 35.1618 deg, Dec -23.2881 to -12.5807 deg Loaded 4142 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3196 out of 3400 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3400 out of 21033 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.737300 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.737300 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.07 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.07
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 21033 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.1142 to 35.1618 deg, Dec -23.2881 to -12.5807 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.1142 to 35.1618 deg, Dec -23.2881 to -12.5807 deg Loaded 4142 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3196 out of 3400 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3400 out of 21033 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (aperture=5.0) Read 23371 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.3056 to 35.3091 deg, Dec -23.3269 to -12.4103 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.3056 to 35.3091 deg, Dec -23.3269 to -12.4103 deg Loaded 4230 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3215 out of 3388 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3388 out of 23371 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits (aperture=4.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 125 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 2.0 pix Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits 3.5 pix fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits 3.5 pix fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.1 mag. Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 15.3 mag. Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.4BOee8oL5S (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=795, bad_region=1, passed=21024 Got 21024 stars (including 20191 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21024 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4867 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21024 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21024 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21024 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4867 stars left (next iteration limit 5353) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits N_match=4867 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=1143 n_q2=1260 n_q3=1188 n_q4=1276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4867 N_valid=4867 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.009 median_sep_arcsec=0.311 p95_sep_arcsec=0.768 n_q1=1143 n_q2=1260 n_q3=1188 n_q4=1276 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.WMlUOqNwu1 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=721, bad_region=24, passed=23358 Got 23358 stars (including 22573 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23358 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23358 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23358 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23358 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5358) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.245 n_q1=1257 n_q2=1241 n_q3=1215 n_q4=1158 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.280 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4871 N_valid=4871 bias_ra_arcsec=0.010 bias_dec_arcsec=0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.232 p95_sep_arcsec=0.606 n_q1=1257 n_q2=1241 n_q3=1215 n_q4=1158 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits -region wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.d8fTDlBNzc (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=493, bad_region=29, passed=14946 Got 14946 stars (including 14402 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14946 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4865 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14946 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14946 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14946 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5350) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=13.752 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.235 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.235 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=0.519 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.798 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.798 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=0.387 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.544 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.544 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4864 robust_rms_before=0.937 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.375 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.387 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.542 worst_region_rms_after=0.544 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.188 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.544 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.542 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.542 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.375 arcsec matched=4864 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=1137 n_q2=1154 n_q3=1295 n_q4=1278 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4864 N_valid=4864 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.229 bias_dec_arcsec=0.374 median_sep_arcsec=0.832 p95_sep_arcsec=1.768 n_q1=1137 n_q2=1154 n_q3=1295 n_q4=1278 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.vX4BZphnkc (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=524, bad_region=26, passed=14986 Got 14986 stars (including 14412 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14986 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4862 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14986 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14986 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14986 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4861 stars left (next iteration limit 5347) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4861 robust_rms=13.645 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.090 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.090 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4861 robust_rms=0.504 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.736 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.736 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4861 robust_rms=0.392 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.539 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.539 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4861 robust_rms_before=0.939 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.377 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.392 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.547 worst_region_rms_after=0.539 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.137 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.539 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.547 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.547 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.377 arcsec matched=4861 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits N_match=4861 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1129 n_q2=1165 n_q3=1290 n_q4=1277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.314 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4861 N_valid=4861 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.247 bias_dec_arcsec=0.409 median_sep_arcsec=0.835 p95_sep_arcsec=1.749 n_q1=1129 n_q2=1165 n_q3=1290 n_q4=1277 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:18:08.91 -14:08:14.0: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:18:08.91 -14:08:14.0: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 02:19:09.44 -14:31:34.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 02:19:09.44 -14:31:34.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:19:09.44 -14:31:34.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:45:27.95 -16:17:56.7: 14.87 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:45:27.95 -16:17:56.7: 15.05 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:45:27.95 -16:17:56.7: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2659 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33617.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33550_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33550_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checksRejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33562_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33562_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 10.87 01:14:42.85 -17:27:41.9 0124 3246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33598_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33598_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 11.11 01:41:53.17 -16:37:58.8 4035 3987 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33602_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33602_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 11.85 01:15:26.07 -22:36:52.5 0477 0121 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33610_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33610_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 11.98 01:26:43.64 -21:22:49.3 2026 1004 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33615_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33615_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.05 01:53:09.13 -20:31:02.1 5727 1708 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33617_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 Preparing report for the candidate 33617_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33622_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33622_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.03 01:48:12.93 -22:20:48.4 5070 0580 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33631_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33631_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.17 01:47:38.90 -20:48:51.6 4957 1504 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33633_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33633_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.25 02:10:28.57 -20:57:20.2 8188 1476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33635_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33635_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.42 02:18:43.36 -23:03:45.2 9367 0177 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33637_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33637_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.48 01:40:35.08 -14:57:59.0 3801 4983 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33638_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33638_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.21 02:13:14.29 -20:32:27.6 8582 1727 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33639_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33639_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.24 02:16:58.25 -21:53:06.2 9118 0903 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33646_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33646_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.52 01:57:00.35 -15:44:14.6 6203 4602 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33648_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33648_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.57 01:19:53.69 -18:46:41.1 0941 2507 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33649_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33649_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.60 01:21:10.36 -20:24:18.8 1196 1536 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33658_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33658_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.85 01:16:23.39 -14:59:42.7 0250 4763 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33662_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33662_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.54 01:46:08.49 -23:06:05.3 4798 0111 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33665_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33665_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.72 01:20:29.61 -19:35:07.8 1063 2025 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33669_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33669_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.97 01:45:40.60 -12:55:47.2 4494 6247 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33673_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33673_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.89 01:24:29.71 -16:01:48.4 1492 4215 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33678_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33678_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.82 01:16:50.78 -15:28:17.3 0341 4478 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33679_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33679_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.03 01:20:14.93 -13:56:34.3 0774 5442 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33680_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33680_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.11 01:42:29.39 -13:28:26.8 4039 5898 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33689_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33689_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.13 02:15:37.15 -13:21:06.4 8934 6101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33691_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33691_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.85 01:15:35.40 -15:48:05.9 0171 4264 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33699_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33699_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.87 01:24:36.52 -21:18:28.9 1723 1026 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33700_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33700_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.93 01:18:43.92 -21:14:48.6 0884 0997 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33701_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33701_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.82 01:19:20.42 -22:33:43.1 1029 0203 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33703_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33703_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.90 01:39:50.53 -16:05:46.3 3725 4297 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33706_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33706_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.76 02:17:01.93 -17:37:39.2 9133 3495 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33713_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33713_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.96 01:15:12.42 -19:15:40.7 0284 2160 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33717_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33717_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.09 01:17:12.67 -13:34:44.3 0303 5635 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33720_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33720_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.09 01:18:51.32 -17:29:49.5 0732 3271 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33721_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33721_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.24 01:42:02.23 -15:03:39.8 4015 4935 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33723_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33723_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.18 01:34:52.31 -21:56:36.5 3193 0737 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33725_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33725_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 12.99 01:23:12.24 -18:19:41.2 1400 2814 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33727_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33727_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.24 01:16:30.79 -16:39:11.2 0349 3757 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33731_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33731_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.34 01:36:25.39 -13:50:39.0 3159 5634 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33733_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33733_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.17 01:47:01.07 -18:42:29.5 4821 2769 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33737_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33737_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.07 02:09:26.02 -17:06:23.4 8022 3807 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits **** FOUND 02:08:49.85 -17:45:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33740_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33740_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.08 02:08:49.86 -17:45:20.4 7937 3413 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33741_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33741_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.26 01:14:10.08 -20:24:00.9 0189 1455 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33742_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33742_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.23 01:20:53.95 -19:12:34.3 1105 2257 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33743_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33743_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.08 02:17:14.65 -19:34:29.7 9160 2311 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33744_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33744_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.34 01:54:49.26 -15:18:37.5 5879 4851 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33747_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33747_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.26 02:16:39.81 -16:37:51.1 9081 4101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33751_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33751_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.32 01:15:12.62 -17:23:01.6 0193 3299 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33757_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33757_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.35 02:10:25.82 -16:19:46.2 8165 4279 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33760_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33760_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.19 02:05:18.26 -20:50:03.2 7451 1547 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33765_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33765_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.22 01:25:36.50 -22:32:29.9 1913 0287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33768_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33768_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.25 02:09:33.02 -20:33:42.9 8054 1715 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33770_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33770_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.48 01:27:32.03 -18:11:13.8 2019 2941 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33775_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33775_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.44 01:17:43.23 -20:37:28.0 0711 1363 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33778_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33778_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.62 01:26:45.98 -14:54:07.9 1779 4918 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33779_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33779_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.82 01:14:48.34 -20:37:33.0 0292 1326 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33780_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33780_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.54 01:27:41.83 -13:45:59.1 1871 5615 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33784_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33784_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.47 02:10:59.74 -13:46:07.9 8243 5837 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33785_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33785_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.36 02:17:17.67 -13:32:13.2 9185 5990 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33786_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33786_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.50 01:25:38.87 -13:33:15.1 1559 5727 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33787_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33787_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.29 01:52:12.20 -20:37:25.4 5595 1640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33790_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33790_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.57 01:22:30.65 -12:54:06.1 1064 6098 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33796_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33796_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.61 01:37:28.82 -13:26:50.6 3302 5882 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33797_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33797_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.38 01:52:28.98 -22:52:53.7 5676 0274 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33798_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33798_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.57 02:18:24.36 -13:22:24.1 9353 6092 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33803_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33803_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.75 01:20:11.41 -13:32:54.8 0747 5682 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33806_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33806_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.38 02:16:54.92 -19:47:50.7 9112 2176 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33807_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33807_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.91 01:57:32.87 -13:08:16.0 6247 6179 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33809_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33809_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.55 01:20:07.16 -15:20:30.9 0819 4590 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33812_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33812_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.53 02:00:53.71 -18:56:28.0 6804 2683 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33813_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33813_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.82 01:34:22.87 -13:00:50.0 2831 6124 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33814_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33814_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.64 02:10:07.21 -13:25:53.6 8112 6041 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33818_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33818_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.39 02:05:06.54 -20:26:57.0 7420 1780 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33822_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33822_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.68 02:08:26.94 -14:54:04.2 7869 5142 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33823_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33823_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.90 01:20:48.18 -21:08:36.2 1175 1084 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33824_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33824_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.52 02:16:52.37 -17:52:58.0 9109 3340 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33827_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33827_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.75 01:37:11.09 -17:06:02.4 3371 3674 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33829_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33829_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.72 02:07:08.41 -20:32:42.1 7710 1724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33830_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33830_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.52 02:14:45.34 -21:35:46.9 8801 1083 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33835_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33835_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.73 01:40:25.89 -18:51:44.0 3887 2637 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33838_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33838_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.01 01:32:46.32 -16:41:41.9 2721 3885 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33840_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33840_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.94 01:28:40.73 -15:54:23.2 2098 4327 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33841_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33841_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.91 01:17:27.37 -16:32:04.8 0482 3839 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33843_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33843_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.06 01:40:29.19 -18:04:16.6 3873 3113 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33846_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33846_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.08 01:14:25.89 -18:24:02.1 0129 2673 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33849_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33849_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.82 02:10:53.27 -16:43:11.1 8233 4043 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33850_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33850_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.94 01:24:31.00 -15:34:09.6 1476 4494 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33855_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33855_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.94 01:24:08.97 -16:50:06.9 1475 3725 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33856_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33856_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.77 02:10:27.64 -16:51:39.2 8171 3957 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33858_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33858_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.07 01:19:17.35 -13:46:19.8 0623 5537 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33859_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33859_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.91 01:36:25.98 -19:39:56.1 3342 2125 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33862_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33862_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.68 02:11:15.74 -21:25:20.6 8302 1192 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33865_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33865_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.67 02:09:43.50 -16:41:39.3 8063 4057 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33866_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33866_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.65 01:58:38.59 -19:49:59.7 6494 2139 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33868_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33868_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.08 01:51:02.53 -18:10:03.1 5384 3114 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33869_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33869_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.76 01:14:10.77 -19:30:43.4 0147 1995 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33870_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33870_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.19 01:31:25.63 -20:24:07.6 2656 1640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33873_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33873_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.45 02:12:31.72 -21:34:02.2 8483 1103 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33875_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33875_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.05 01:23:19.96 -16:53:06.5 1358 3687 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33877_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33877_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.07 01:23:05.19 -14:19:10.3 1212 5239 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33879_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33879_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.22 01:50:52.58 -16:13:29.8 5323 4282 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33880_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33880_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.95 01:57:45.98 -15:41:38.4 6313 4631 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33883_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33883_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.38 01:28:15.76 -16:59:56.5 2079 3664 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33884_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33884_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.88 01:51:15.20 -14:20:20.3 5342 5422 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33885_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33885_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.14 02:10:09.87 -14:27:47.3 8121 5412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33886_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33886_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.11 01:16:15.41 -19:12:45.9 0434 2202 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33891_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33891_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.98 01:43:27.35 -21:41:51.4 4389 0947 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33893_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33893_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.25 02:11:53.51 -13:11:41.0 8376 6190 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33895_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33895_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.41 01:59:35.94 -14:01:23.7 6560 5649 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33897_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33897_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.02 02:07:17.27 -21:51:17.7 7740 0929 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33898_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33898_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.98 01:38:31.62 -13:16:57.7 3451 5989 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Discovery image 1 2026 10 21.25188 2461334.75188 14.12 02:19:09.42 -14:31:34.0 9459 5386 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33901_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33901_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.96 02:19:09.46 -14:31:34.5 9460 5386 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33905_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33905_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.06 02:15:23.04 -17:03:17.8 8892 3843 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33907_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33907_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 13.95 02:05:43.54 -16:14:27.8 7477 4324 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33909_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33909_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.18 01:41:04.75 -13:37:34.3 3836 5797 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33914_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33914_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.20 01:28:08.10 -14:34:05.5 1967 5132 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33915_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33915_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.20 01:37:48.39 -22:48:38.1 3630 0234 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33916_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33916_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.38 01:47:37.63 -16:58:38.9 4870 3813 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33917_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33917_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.13 02:02:44.31 -15:55:15.7 7039 4510 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Discovery image 1 2026 10 21.25188 2461334.75188 14.31 01:45:27.89 -16:17:57.7 4543 4210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33918_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33918_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.23 01:45:28.01 -16:17:55.7 4543 4209 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33919_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33919_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.20 01:43:39.16 -16:43:32.6 4292 3942 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33923_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 33923_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.47 02:07:06.30 -17:34:31.4 7686 3520 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 04758_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 04758_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 14.42 02:17:57.65 -15:10:09.4 9278 4992 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits **** FOUND 02:15:59.69 -20:31:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 14457_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 The candidate 14457_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 10.30 02:15:59.69 -20:31:08.9 8978 1738 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 01:18:08.91 -14:08:14.0 ########### Completed Cet-11-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 01:18:08.91 -14:08:14.0 ################################################################################### 01:18:08.91 -14:08:14.0 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461334.75187856 -observatory V36 15:06:42.18 -20:48:12.4 Mercury (0.2mag) 13:49:42.65 -18:43:38.9 Venus (-4.3mag) 09:02:08.05 +18:20:02.1 Mars (1.0mag) 09:40:20.80 +14:37:35.6 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:39:41.49 +01:19:54.2 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:10:55.66 +20:55:01.4 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:09:25.09 -00:31:31.2 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:10.55 -23:43:06.3 Pluto (14.5mag) 21:51:36.23 -13:30:33.7 Moon (-11.1mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 21 01:08 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461334.75187856: 09:40:27.96 +14:36:56.0 Io (6.1mag) 09:40:17.65 +14:37:52.5 Europa (6.2mag) 09:40:17.67 +14:37:53.9 Ganymede (5.5mag) 09:40:35.88 +14:36:13.8 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:40:49.93 +14:54:31.9 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:40:23.47 +14:37:21.5 Thebe (16.4mag) 09:39:24.00 +15:01:11.8 Elara (17.5mag) 09:42:07.35 +14:01:36.1 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:38:15.31 +15:07:00.0 Carme (18.8mag) 00:39:52.75 +01:19:46.8 Titan (8.2mag) 00:39:38.83 +01:19:58.0 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:39:37.33 +01:17:54.2 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:39:57.33 +01:19:31.7 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:37:56.89 +01:07:29.0 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 21 01:08 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461334.75187856: 03:44:27.48 +20:15:49.2 JWST 15:05:56.20 +52:04:20.7 Chandra 11:37:49.52 -60:39:38.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 21 01:08 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461334.75187856 -observatory V36 03:42:07.62 +20:10:09.5 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:41:10.02 +37:30:28.8 18.0mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill) 07:41:15.00 +37:30:16.2 18.0mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 07:40:36.09 +37:30:28.2 18.0mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill) 05:02:16.72 +40:58:35.9 18.0mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski) 18:34:03.80 -33:15:01.5 14.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:43:08.21 -73:03:08.9 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:14:25.61 +34:56:13.4 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:42:38.72 +48:14:50.6 17.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 07:33:24.87 +25:22:44.3 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:05:52.75 +36:47:13.9 16.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:29:52.31 +41:08:50.8 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:45:57.09 -13:39:55.3 16.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:35:52.82 +15:11:32.2 16.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 14:01:08.10 -03:32:12.8 16.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 19:23:05.63 +60:45:36.2 15.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:24:55.66 +41:42:38.6 18.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:55:07.25 +15:19:08.5 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:25:03.06 -50:29:27.1 13.5mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 19:22:06.11 -05:04:33.0 14.7mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS) 00:01:50.55 +17:13:56.9 17.2mag 2P/Encke 23:09:38.41 -29:20:25.5 14.9mag 10P/Tempel 02:23:57.78 +36:18:07.8 16.5mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:17:46.06 -08:58:05.4 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:16:34.67 -09:04:14.7 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 07:47:49.62 +14:57:14.9 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 02:49:29.42 +13:49:01.2 17.8mag 88P/Howell 08:14:37.12 +42:53:44.1 17.0mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:24:44.46 +10:33:00.9 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 12:01:01.49 +11:00:28.6 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 14:31:58.54 -34:54:11.0 17.9mag 124P/Mrkos 20:34:10.67 +09:46:01.4 9.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:42:42.54 -00:33:20.8 15.2mag 169P/NEAT 03:22:36.72 +03:24:49.2 15.0mag 220P/McNaught 06:15:47.06 +47:17:47.3 15.5mag 260P/McNaught 07:41:12.40 +25:21:57.2 17.8mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Oct 21 01:08 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 21 01:08 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag 05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag 05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 21 01:08 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 23:12:33.937 -06:53:55.14 AT 2026adyq 2026-10-01.00 19.408 07:57:37.025 +37:54:49.27 SN 2026adyp 2026-10-02.18 18.628 16:33:54.937 +20:21:19.93 AT 2026adyo 2026-10-01.22 18.471 15:12:55.339 +35:26:19.35 AT 2026adyn 2026-10-02.22 18.803 22:27:56.363 +38:36:11.47 AT 2026adym 2026-09-15.32 20.54 01:57:30.981 -22:32:19.78 AT 2026adyl 2026-09-05.53 20.9 18:00:55.941 +52:22:30.66 AT 2026adyk 2026-09-05.27 20.6 03:26:38.818 -27:16:41.69 AT 2026adyj 2026-09-05.59 21.1 23:12:58.798 -28:24:24.33 AT 2026adyi 2026-09-04.42 20.73 20:04:39.993 -23:13:07.01 AT 2026adyh 2026-09-29.19 19.8534 23:02:49.544 -27:01:30.13 AT 2026adyg 2026-09-04.42 21.06 00:48:19.388 +09:14:18.05 AT 2026adyf 2026-09-03.40 21.12 03:04:16.460 -25:36:53.81 AT 2026adye 2026-09-05.58 20.91 03:51:14.641 -29:54:43.32 AT 2026adyd 2026-09-05.59 21.03 19:51:37.151 -24:14:08.83 AT 2026adyc 2026-09-04.26 20.43 23:01:33.774 -16:23:29.58 AT 2026adyb 2026-09-05.36 21.18 17:33:59.236 +41:10:38.61 AT 2026adya 2026-09-04.28 21.02 17:15:41.351 +39:47:14.19 AT 2026adxz 2026-09-04.27 20.68 00:40:25.304 -19:35:36.26 AT 2026adxy 2026-09-04.46 21.24 17:56:26.542 +22:26:25.77 AT 2026adxx 2026-09-09.27 20.14 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 21 01:08 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 2 2026 10 21.25234 2461334.75234 10.95 01:19:11.25 -14:28:40.6 0641 5106 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-21_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_010547_TTUQ1b1x1_3158679_BgfEd1MU/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-10-21_01-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
