This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.1936 2461334.6936 10.85 05:22:09.13 +22:57:40.8
182.18671 -7.66345 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis 1 1 1 11.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:22:09.13 +22:57:40.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:22:09.13 +22:57:40.8: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.1936* 05 22 09.13 +22 57 40.8 10.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.6936,10.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.1936 10.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.1936 2461334.6936 11.85 05:07:32.89 +26:11:34.7
177.59140 -8.53812 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales 0 0 0 12.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:07:32.89 +26:11:34.7: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:07:32.89 +26:11:34.7: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.1936* 05 07 32.89 +26 11 34.7 11.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.6936,11.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.1936 11.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.1936* 05 21 07.62 +23 38 20.1 11.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1452 Tau,2461334.6936,11.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1452 Tau 20261021.1936 11.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.1936 2461334.6936 12.79 05:18:48.36 +20:20:12.4
183.95362 -9.77125 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula 0 -0 0 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:18:48.36 +20:20:12.4: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:18:48.36 +20:20:12.4: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.1936* 05 18 48.36 +20 20 12.4 12.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.6936,12.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.1936 12.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.1936 2461334.6936 12.52 06:06:50.76 +25:28:46.6
185.36162 2.33959 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.110 Lydia 1 0 1 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:06:50.76 +25:28:46.6: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:06:50.76 +25:28:46.6: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.6936,12.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.1936 12.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.1936 2461334.6936 13.63 05:03:55.55 +24:38:15.1
178.37586 -10.11584 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.418 Alemannia -0 0 0 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:03:55.55 +24:38:15.1: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:03:55.55 +24:38:15.1: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 21.1936* 05 03 55.55 +24 38 15.1 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.6936,13.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.1936 13.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461334.69394519 21.10.2026 04:39:06.864 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20202
Objects passed selection criteria: 20117
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14945.2
Average stars matched: 14745 (98.6601 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 245524 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 20 23:45:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461334.69394519 21.10.2026 04:39:06.864 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 120
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 37 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 150302
Objects passed selection criteria: 149923
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 112980
Average stars matched: 109563 (96.976 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 550696 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 20 23:46:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461334.69330705
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Image size: 945.3'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:16.779 +22:00:13.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:16.779 +22:00:13.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0117 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Image size: 945.1'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.591 +22:00:16.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:19.591 +22:00:16.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0052 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:16.779 +22:00:13.62
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:19.591 +22:00:16.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01089 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eEkl1usjc1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DBTto1D0wh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dj88lxvCyj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qfX3s4UfQQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.eEkl1usjc1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=0, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 20487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1531 n_q2=718 n_q3=1554 n_q4=910 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4713 N_valid=4713 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.260 p95_sep_arcsec=1.482 n_q1=1531 n_q2=718 n_q3=1554 n_q4=910 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DBTto1D0wh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4715 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4715 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1527 n_q2=718 n_q3=1564 n_q4=906 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4715 N_valid=4715 bias_ra_arcsec=0.000 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.008 median_sep_arcsec=0.353 p95_sep_arcsec=1.559 n_q1=1527 n_q2=718 n_q3=1564 n_q4=906 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.dj88lxvCyj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=501, bad_region=0, passed=8087
Got 8087 stars (including 7573 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8087 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4786 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4725 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4785 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4721 stars left (next iteration limit 5193)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4721 robust_rms=9.690 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.529 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.529 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4721 robust_rms=0.714 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.137 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.137 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4721 robust_rms=0.468 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.627 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.603 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4721 robust_rms_before=1.622 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.473 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.468 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.679 worst_region_rms_after=0.627 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.511 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.603
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.679 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.679 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.473 arcsec matched=4721
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits N_match=4721 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.576 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.431 n_q1=1010 n_q2=1322 n_q3=851 n_q4=1538 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4721 N_valid=4721 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.133 bias_dec_arcsec=0.688 median_sep_arcsec=1.425 p95_sep_arcsec=4.491 n_q1=1010 n_q2=1322 n_q3=851 n_q4=1538 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qfX3s4UfQQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=465, bad_region=1, passed=8137
Got 8137 stars (including 7658 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8137 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4794 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8137 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4795 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8137 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8137 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4726 stars left (next iteration limit 5198)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4726 robust_rms=9.578 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.977 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.977 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4726 robust_rms=0.721 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.114 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.114 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4726 robust_rms=0.450 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.620 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.620 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4726 robust_rms_before=1.637 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.459 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.450 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.667 worst_region_rms_after=0.620 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.392 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.620
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.667 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.667 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.459 arcsec matched=4726
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits N_match=4726 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.462 n_q1=1018 n_q2=1343 n_q3=837 n_q4=1528 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4726 N_valid=4726 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.133 bias_dec_arcsec=0.668 median_sep_arcsec=1.409 p95_sep_arcsec=4.454 n_q1=1018 n_q2=1343 n_q3=837 n_q4=1528 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.488 worst_q_ratio=1.234
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits sigma_overall=0.483 worst_q_ratio=1.193
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits sigma_overall=0.479 worst_q_ratio=1.093
reference average sigma_overall=0.4325 worst_q_ratio=1.2345
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4715 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114_astrometric_residuals.png (4721 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115_astrometric_residuals.png (4726 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:22:09.13 +22:57:40.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:22:09.13 +22:57:40.8: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30744.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30744_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 30744_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.56 +17:54:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03444_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 03444_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.83 +25:25:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:49.02 +20:10:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:22:09.13 +22:57:40.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Image size: 945.3'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:16.779 +22:00:13.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:16.779 +22:00:13.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0117 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Image size: 945.1'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.591 +22:00:16.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:19.591 +22:00:16.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0052 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:16.779 +22:00:13.62
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:19.591 +22:00:16.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01089 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IEiVvOstyF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7IX3CY3NCx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Hr040tsl89
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ysmpp6IW1E
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 113 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.IEiVvOstyF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=13, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 145983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1463 n_q2=774 n_q3=1520 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4716 N_valid=4716 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.250 p95_sep_arcsec=1.336 n_q1=1463 n_q2=774 n_q3=1520 n_q4=959 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.7IX3CY3NCx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4758 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4710 stars left (next iteration limit 5183)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4710 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=977 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4710 N_valid=4710 bias_ra_arcsec=0.006 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.337 p95_sep_arcsec=1.469 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=977 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Hr040tsl89 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2834, bad_region=23, passed=61555
Got 61555 stars (including 58610 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61555 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4781 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61555 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4781 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61555 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61555 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4721 stars left (next iteration limit 5193)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4721 robust_rms=9.759 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.775 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.775 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4721 robust_rms=0.711 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.100 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.100 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4721 robust_rms=0.469 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.624 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.608 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4721 robust_rms_before=1.599 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.433 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.469 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.620 worst_region_rms_after=0.624 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.477 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.608
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.620 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.620 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.433 arcsec matched=4721
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits N_match=4721 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.408 n_q1=1026 n_q2=1292 n_q3=858 n_q4=1545 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4721 N_valid=4721 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.130 bias_dec_arcsec=0.679 median_sep_arcsec=1.399 p95_sep_arcsec=4.217 n_q1=1026 n_q2=1292 n_q3=858 n_q4=1545 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Ysmpp6IW1E (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2827, bad_region=23, passed=61997
Got 61997 stars (including 59055 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4784 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4723 stars left (next iteration limit 5194)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4723 robust_rms=9.761 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.001 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.001 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4723 robust_rms=0.705 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.101 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.101 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4723 robust_rms=0.446 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.621 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.621 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4723 robust_rms_before=1.624 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.425 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.446 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.623 worst_region_rms_after=0.621 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.373 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.621
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.623 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.623 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.425 arcsec matched=4723
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits N_match=4723 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.415 n_q1=1021 n_q2=1307 n_q3=849 n_q4=1546 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.124
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4723 N_valid=4723 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.135 bias_dec_arcsec=0.659 median_sep_arcsec=1.387 p95_sep_arcsec=4.206 n_q1=1021 n_q2=1307 n_q3=849 n_q4=1546 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-38-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_234157_TTUQ1b1x1_1135181_YJ7y1R2t/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:03:14.34 +18:14:53.7: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:19.64 +24:08:26.5: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:09:07.97 +21:52:56.3: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:07:32.89 +26:11:34.7: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:19.64 +24:08:26.5: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:14.34 +18:14:53.7: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:19.64 +24:08:26.5: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0616 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:14.34 +18:14:53.7: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6304 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:09:07.97 +21:52:56.3: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:07:32.89 +26:11:34.7: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:07.97 +21:52:56.3: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4121 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:31:40.06 +18:13:14.7: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:18:48.36 +20:20:12.4: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:31:40.06 +18:13:14.7: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:18:48.36 +20:20:12.4: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:40.06 +18:13:14.7: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5581 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:06:50.76 +25:28:46.6: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:40:12.81 +24:31:53.1: 12.95 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:24:12.99 +20:07:34.2: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:06:50.76 +25:28:46.6: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:24:12.99 +20:07:34.2: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:40:12.81 +24:31:53.1: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:12.99 +20:07:34.2: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0098 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:40:12.81 +24:31:53.1: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8959 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:35:02.45 +24:18:47.9: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:35:02.45 +24:18:47.9: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:02.45 +24:18:47.9: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9972 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:23.44 +26:25:52.2: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:23.44 +26:25:52.2: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:23.44 +26:25:52.2: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7815 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.63 +25:20:29.8: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:03:55.55 +24:38:15.1: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.63 +25:20:29.8: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.63 +25:20:29.8: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2953 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:59.86 +22:34:34.2: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:03:55.55 +24:38:15.1: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:29:17.53 +21:19:43.1: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:59.86 +22:34:34.2: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:59.86 +22:34:34.2: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1343 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:29:17.53 +21:19:43.1: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:29:17.53 +21:19:43.1: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3177 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:29:19.09 +21:33:29.8: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:17:36.41 +22:50:22.9: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:29:19.09 +21:33:29.8: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:29:19.09 +21:33:29.8: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5457 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:36.41 +22:50:22.9: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:36.41 +22:50:22.9: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7809 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out190695.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out190887.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out190963.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191121.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190564_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190564_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:55.54 +23:05:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190566_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190566_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:10.07 +26:28:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190567_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190567_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:30.28 +19:22:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190569_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190569_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:06.21 +17:57:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190577_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190577_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:55.36 +23:19:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190581_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190581_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190582_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190582_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:21.90 +23:00:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190584_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:26.77 +25:17:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:58.04 +22:41:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190588_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190588_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190592_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190592_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.19 +18:20:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190598_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190598_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190599_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190599_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:49.42 +17:17:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190603_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190603_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:16.90 +20:08:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190654_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190654_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:09.13 +22:57:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190661_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190661_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:58.93 +26:19:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190694_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190694_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:52.05 +19:58:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190695_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 190695_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190700_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 190700_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190785_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190785_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.85 +25:55:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190799_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190799_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.72 +22:27:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190811_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190811_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.85 +23:48:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190821_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190821_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.11 +22:38:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190833_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190833_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.96 +26:25:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190851_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190851_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:41.74 +23:02:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190862_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190862_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:05.16 +17:03:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190875_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190875_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:01.74 +26:45:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190876_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190876_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:09.93 +18:33:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190877_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190877_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.73 +19:34:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190881_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190881_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190887_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 190887_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190889_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190889_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.94 +25:05:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190905_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190905_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:00.65 +20:46:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190913_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190913_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:37.51 +21:37:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190915_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190915_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:24.42 +18:37:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190921_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190921_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:56.14 +24:36:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190923_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190923_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.26 +18:59:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190939_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190939_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:20.95 +23:48:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190940_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190940_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.96 +20:10:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.83 +22:03:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190953_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190953_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.31 +18:33:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190959_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190959_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.79 +22:40:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190963_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 190963_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190964_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190964_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:20.41 +22:03:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190965_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190965_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190985_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190985_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.07 +23:12:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190988_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190988_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190989_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190989_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:40.17 +20:26:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190991_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190991_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.30 +22:45:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190992_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190992_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:36.61 +22:27:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190998_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 190998_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.36 +25:47:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191000_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191000_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191027_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191027_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:10.80 +25:24:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191030_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191030_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:23.09 +25:24:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191034_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191034_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.64 +20:02:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191035_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191035_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:48.67 +25:09:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191038_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191038_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.79 +18:25:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191041_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191041_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:13.81 +21:51:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191046_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191046_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191060_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191060_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.20 +23:00:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191075_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191075_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.24 +20:53:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191080_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191080_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:37.58 +22:22:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191083_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191083_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.66 +20:05:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191085_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191085_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.50 +21:46:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191086_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191086_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.67 +26:42:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191088_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191088_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.82 +19:32:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:33.99 +18:37:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191103_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191103_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:02.95 +18:33:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191111_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191111_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191121_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 191121_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191125_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191125_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:11.24 +18:40:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191126_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191126_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:02.53 +18:29:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191139_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191139_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:45.93 +17:11:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191146_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191146_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:14.96 +19:35:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191148_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191148_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:24.53 +22:16:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191151_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191151_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191159_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191159_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:37.13 +25:25:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191163_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191163_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191169_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191169_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:52.45 +24:25:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191185_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191185_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:11.69 +25:41:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191204_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191204_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.47 +20:56:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191209_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191209_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:04.49 +20:26:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191215_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191215_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.34 +23:07:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191221_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191221_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:30.43 +20:09:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191233_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191233_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.74 +23:11:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191236_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191236_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:20.37 +25:08:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191244_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191244_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:21.79 +24:21:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191255_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191255_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:45.62 +21:24:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191270_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191270_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:51.67 +20:00:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191275_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191275_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191277_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191277_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:34.77 +17:59:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191278_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191278_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191302_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191302_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:33.71 +21:19:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191305_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191305_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:20.85 +24:22:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191314_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 191314_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:56.33 +22:27:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.22 +17:53:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.23 +24:10:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.42 +26:13:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:36.89 +23:10:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 34402_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.04 +24:53:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180433_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 180433_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:05.57 +24:48:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68483_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 68483_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:59.72 +22:30:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164953_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 164953_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144961_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 144961_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:37.40 +20:19:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.76 +19:21:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111714_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 111714_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:30.77 +22:47:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.10 +20:22:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.55 +17:54:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.15 +21:51:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.83 +25:25:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-10-20_23-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
