NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Her-01-Q2b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Her-01-Q2b1x1 reference image: Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits
Field Her-01-Q2b1x1 reference image: Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Field Her-01-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Field Her-01-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Her-01-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Her-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Her-01-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 276149 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 276149 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.png' -> 'transient_report/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits_preview.png'
Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits

renamed 'Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.png' -> 'transient_report/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits_preview.png'
Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 383.6175 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 545.7360 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3384.3195 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1272.1203 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3276.2706 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1116.4948 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 8.82212 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.139 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ERROR: passing clouds (SD ratio=0.139 soft threshold=0.12) ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.1000003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-20T22:17:56.5777245' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-21T03:17:56.5777245' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61334.1374603817 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-21T03:18:06.4824677' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61334.1375750233 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 251.999031026406 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9996068736202 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 26.7175 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 309.161388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.21578966378105 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Her-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '16 48 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20706 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20706 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.1000003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.1000003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 72.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 906.6 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 20.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 2.5002 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/d_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits :) Spent 0.784114 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/d_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.1599998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-20T22:19:08.2039639' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-21T03:19:08.2039639' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61334.1382893864 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-21T03:19:18.1068316' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61334.1384040047 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 251.999031100006 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9996069316551 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 26.5238888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 309.249166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.23063023970961 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Her-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '16 48 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20706 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20706 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.1599998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.1599998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 72.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 906.6 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 20.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 2.5002 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/d_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits :) Spent 0.778678 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/d_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits


fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461334.63757612 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:47:59.865 +45:59:58.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits Image size: 937.7'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:48:32.509 +46:01:13.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:47:59.865 +45:59:58.58 Second-epoch image center 16:48:32.509 +46:01:13.59 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0967 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits Image size: 937.7'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:48:34.259 +46:01:55.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:47:59.865 +45:59:58.58 Second-epoch image center 16:48:34.259 +46:01:55.27 Angular distance between the image centers 0.1047 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 16:48:32.509 +46:01:13.59 Second-epoch second image center 16:48:34.259 +46:01:55.27 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01264 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r8GMWWJyJF Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits &> /tmp/tmp.09PkvnjwTX Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zpgP4GeKu8 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q1vC8rQnWl Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits and wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits and wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits and wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits) and catalog (wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 11558 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 239.7612 to 264.2692 deg, Dec +40.3316 to +51.2606 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 239.7612 to 264.2692 deg, Dec 40.3316 to 51.2606 deg Loaded 7223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3542 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3542 out of 11558 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.782850 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.782850 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.70 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.70
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 11558 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 239.7612 to 264.2692 deg, Dec +40.3316 to +51.2606 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 239.7612 to 264.2692 deg, Dec 40.3316 to 51.2606 deg Loaded 7223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3542 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3542 out of 11558 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits (aperture=6.1) Read 10041 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 239.7803 to 264.3744 deg, Dec +40.2911 to +51.2599 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 239.7803 to 264.3744 deg, Dec 40.2911 to 51.2599 deg Loaded 7300 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5423 out of 5624 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5624 out of 10041 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits (aperture=6.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits 2.2 pix Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits 3.1 pix fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 3.0 pix fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits 15.5 mag. Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits 14.1 mag. fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 14.5 mag. fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.r8GMWWJyJF (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits' -> 'wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=665, bad_region=3218, passed=11558 Got 11558 stars (including 7844 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11558 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5377) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=1504 n_q2=1028 n_q3=1426 n_q4=932 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4890 N_valid=4890 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.472 bias_dec_arcsec=0.560 median_sep_arcsec=3.647 p95_sep_arcsec=8.416 n_q1=1504 n_q2=1028 n_q3=1426 n_q4=932 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits -region wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.09PkvnjwTX (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits' -> 'wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=580, bad_region=1957, passed=10041 Got 10041 stars (including 7579 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10041 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8494 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8494 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8494 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5381) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=1635 n_q2=788 n_q3=1639 n_q4=830 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4892 N_valid=4892 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.012 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.008 median_sep_arcsec=0.297 p95_sep_arcsec=0.859 n_q1=1635 n_q2=788 n_q3=1639 n_q4=830 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits -region wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.zpgP4GeKu8 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=89, bad_region=660, passed=1381 Got 1381 stars (including 672 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1381 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 707 (Dec 40.3 to 51.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 641 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 639 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 606 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 639 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 780 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 707 (Dec 40.3 to 51.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 641 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 640 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 780 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 640 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 780 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Excluding outliers - 640 stars left (next iteration limit 702) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=640 robust_rms=10.001 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.646 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.768 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=640 robust_rms=0.492 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.750 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.705 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=640 robust_rms_before=0.579 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.548 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.492 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.694 worst_region_rms_after=0.750 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.902 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.705 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.694 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.694 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.548 arcsec matched=640 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits N_match=640 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.673 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.532 n_q1=123 n_q2=275 n_q3=82 n_q4=160 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=640 N_valid=640 bias_ra_arcsec=0.191 bias_dec_arcsec=0.023 median_sep_arcsec=0.497 p95_sep_arcsec=1.543 n_q1=123 n_q2=275 n_q3=82 n_q4=160 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -region wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.q1vC8rQnWl (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=91, bad_region=741, passed=1611 Got 1611 stars (including 819 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1611 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 755 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 978 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 977 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 977 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 779 stars left (next iteration limit 856) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=779 robust_rms=5.161 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.031 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=-1.000 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=779 robust_rms=0.430 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.561 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=-1.000 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=779 robust_rms_before=0.564 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.434 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.430 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.522 worst_region_rms_after=0.561 outer_annulus_rms_before=-1.000 outer_annulus_rms_after=-1.000 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.522 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.522 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.434 arcsec matched=779 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits N_match=779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=105 n_q2=348 n_q3=82 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.311 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=779 N_valid=779 bias_ra_arcsec=0.272 bias_dec_arcsec=0.040 median_sep_arcsec=0.497 p95_sep_arcsec=1.138 n_q1=105 n_q2=348 n_q3=82 n_q4=244 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.102 ref2=Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.077 new1=fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits sigma_overall=0.572 worst_q_ratio=1.177 new2=fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits sigma_overall=0.436 worst_q_ratio=1.311 reference average sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.0895 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q2: 275 -> 348, 20.977% > 20%; fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits vs fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q4: 160 -> 244, 34.426% > 20%; fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits vs fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196_astrometric_residuals.png (4892 matched stars from wcs_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172_astrometric_residuals.png (640 matched stars from wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173_astrometric_residuals.png (779 matched stars from wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Her-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Her-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits Last image: 2461334.63757612 21.10.2026 03:17:56.577 UTC WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Her-01-Q2b1x1 as too few input images were matched to the reference image - wrong pointing? clouds? very bad focus? Blind plate solve of the unmatched second-epoch image fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits to check the telescope pointing Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits .... Determining astrometry method... Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 1896 high-SNR stars for plate solving This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Reading input file 1 of 1: "out588727.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out588727.axy"... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10). log-odds ratio 44.2505 (1.65097e+19), 10 match, 0 conflict, 22 distractors, 102 index. RA,Dec = (252.085,46.0336), pixel scale 5.91233 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------++---+--+---++---+--+---++(best)----------+----+--++---+------+----------------------------+-------- Field 1: solved with index index-4114.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out588727.solved to indicate this. Field: out588727.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (252.133404, 46.022635) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (16:48:32.017, +46:01:21.484). Field size: 15.7339 x 10.5325 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 179.426 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. Opening FITS image file input.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_input.fits)... done! done! All done! Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run Reading input file 1 of 1: "out588727.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out588727.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.6467 degrees of RA,Dec (252.132,46.0218) Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-100). log-odds ratio 81.2214 (1.87937e+35), 14 match, 0 conflict, 34 distractors, 44 index. RA,Dec = (252.132,46.0214), pixel scale 5.94957 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--+--+--+-----++-------++-+-----+-----++----++(best)----------------------------+----------------------- Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out588727.solved to indicate this. Field: out588727.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (252.136229, 46.020282) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (16:48:32.695, +46:01:13.014). Field size: 15.719 x 10.5332 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 179.44 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. Opening FITS image file input.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_input.fits)... done! done! All done! Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... simplexy: found 7481 sources. Solving... Reading file "/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/out588727_image_verify.MwLXa8/solution.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4665, 951.401] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 44.0802 (1.3925e+19), 7 match, 0 conflict, 100 distractors, 7 index. RA,Dec = (252.137,46.0211), pixel scale 5.96116 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+-+----------------------+---------+-------------------------------------------------+-----+----- fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) --> log-odds 44.0802 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 139.14 (2.67724e+60), 17 match, 0 conflict, 134 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (252.137,46.0211), pixel scale 5.96116 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+-+-------------+--+-----++------+-+-------------------------------+-+--+-------+----+-----+----- --> log-odds 139.14 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 317.168 (5.54804e+137), 40 match, 0 conflict, 572 distractors, 44 index. RA,Dec = (252.137,46.0211), pixel scale 5.96116 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+-+++--------+--+--+-----++------+++--++--+--++------------+-------+-+--+-----+++---++--+--+----- --> log-odds 317.168 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 790.315 (inf), 94 match, 0 conflict, 1016 distractors, 104 index. RA,Dec = (252.137,46.0211), pixel scale 5.96116 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--+++++-----+++++-++-+++++-++--+++++++-+++-++--++-+--+-----+++--++++-+-+++++----+++---++--+--+-++-- --> log-odds 790.315 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1394.41 (inf), 163 match, 0 conflict, 987 distractors, 186 index. RA,Dec = (252.137,46.0211), pixel scale 5.96116 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+++++-+-++++++++++++++++-++--+++++++-+++-+++-++-+--+--+--+++--++++-+++++++-+-++++---++--+--+-++-- --> log-odds 1394.41 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 2898.98 (inf), 343 match, 0 conflict, 1350 distractors, 389 index. RA,Dec = (252.137,46.0211), pixel scale 5.96116 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++-++++++++++++++++++-++--+++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-++++--+++++++++-++++ --> log-odds 2898.98 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 4955.68 (inf), 619 match, 0 conflict, 1782 distractors, 731 index. RA,Dec = (252.137,46.0211), pixel scale 5.96116 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++--+++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++- --> log-odds 4955.68 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 8569.1 (inf), 1143 match, 0 conflict, 2102 distractors, 1449 index. RA,Dec = (252.137,46.0211), pixel scale 5.96116 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++--+++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 8569.1 Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4665, 951.401] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 44.0802 (1.3925e+19), 7 match, 0 conflict, 100 distractors, 7 index. RA,Dec = (252.137,46.0211), pixel scale 5.96116 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+-+----------------------+---------+-------------------------------------------------+-----+----- fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (7 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 10) --> log-odds 44.0802 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 139.14 (2.67724e+60), 17 match, 0 conflict, 134 distractors, 21 index. RA,Dec = (252.137,46.0211), pixel scale 5.96116 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+-+-------------+--+-----++------+-+-------------------------------+-+--+-------+----+-----+----- --> log-odds 139.14 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 317.168 (5.54804e+137), 40 match, 0 conflict, 572 distractors, 44 index. RA,Dec = (252.137,46.0211), pixel scale 5.96116 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+-+++--------+--+--+-----++------+++--++--+--++------------+-------+-+--+-----+++---++--+--+----- --> log-odds 317.168 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 790.315 (inf), 94 match, 0 conflict, 1016 distractors, 104 index. RA,Dec = (252.137,46.0211), pixel scale 5.96116 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--+++++-----+++++-++-+++++-++--+++++++-+++-++--++-+--+-----+++--++++-+-+++++----+++---++--+--+-++-- --> log-odds 790.315 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1394.41 (inf), 163 match, 0 conflict, 987 distractors, 186 index. RA,Dec = (252.137,46.0211), pixel scale 5.96116 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+++++-+-++++++++++++++++-++--+++++++-+++-+++-++-+--+--+--+++--++++-+++++++-+-++++---++--+--+-++-- --> log-odds 1394.41 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 2898.98 (inf), 343 match, 0 conflict, 1350 distractors, 389 index. RA,Dec = (252.137,46.0211), pixel scale 5.96116 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++-++++++++++++++++++-++--+++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-++++--+++++++++-++++ --> log-odds 2898.98 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 4955.68 (inf), 619 match, 0 conflict, 1782 distractors, 731 index. RA,Dec = (252.137,46.0211), pixel scale 5.96116 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++--+++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++- --> log-odds 4955.68 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 8569.1 (inf), 1143 match, 0 conflict, 2102 distractors, 1449 index. RA,Dec = (252.137,46.0211), pixel scale 5.96116 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-++--+++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 8569.1 Got 16 solutions. Field: wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (252.136636, 46.021278) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (16:48:32.793, +46:01:16.601). Field size: 15.7183 x 10.5301 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 179.433 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/out588727_image_verify.MwLXa8/solution.new"... renamed '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/out588727_image_verify.MwLXa8/solution.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits Generating wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat Catalog wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits Image size: 937.7'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:48:32.509 +46:01:13.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 10372 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_711072.cat.log' 'wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.xy2sky.U3gTvD' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_711072.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the blindly solved unmatched second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:47:59.865 +45:59:58.58 Second-epoch image center 16:48:32.509 +46:01:13.59 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0967 deg. ################################### The second-epoch image center is consistent with the reference image center (offset 0.0967 deg.) - the star matching failure is probably not a pointing problem ____ VaST output ____ --==VaST 1.0rc90==-- Parsing command line arguments... opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius! opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching! opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source! opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted! opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope) opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag! WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars. opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done! opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually! opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored! INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ... Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found. This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file. Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm)... OK Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files. Done with cleaning! VaST was started with the following command line: ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits Preparing to process 4 input FITS images... ######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ######## transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search! transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search! transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!! transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3 transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars transient search mode: not discarding large sources ################ Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix We have 4 images to process. SExtractor catalog cache: restored Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits catalog from cache SExtractor catalog cache: restored Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits catalog from cache Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads... Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Parent process says: we are done fork()ing. Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Waiting for thread 2 to finish... Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.8,4.8,4.3,5.3,5.8,6.3 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.7,4.7,4.3,5.2,5.7,6.2 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits Waiting for thread 1 to finish... autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits Done with SExtractor! TIMING SExtractor: 6 seconds Matching stars between images! No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine. Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-05-13T08:12:21.5389914 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-05-13T08:12:21.5389914 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-05-13T08:12:21.538 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits Exposure 20 sec, 13.05.2026 08:12:21.538 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461173.84203169 mid. exp. The reference image star 8649.712 35.133 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9025.105 20.976 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9440.971 21.649 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8186.082 19.181 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8180.133 15.203 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7541.085 14.438 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9355.277 13.586 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8819.069 9.958 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8570.870 12.461 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8442.266 12.126 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more reference image stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 48158, (48157 good for image matching) * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 14 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 12685 * rejected close to frame edge: 191 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.8 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 67 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied. get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -6.80 Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -6.8 (4.0 sigma detection) The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.4 80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -7.5 Selected detection limit= -7.5 Final detection limit= -7.5 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0) Parameter box for transient search: 10.04.7 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 81 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 48856 * detected, using 507/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.009763, number_of_ambiguous_matches=477 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=33323 inliers=33323 rms 0.76 -> 0.39 pix, max corner correction 3.6 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.009804, number_of_ambiguous_matches=479 33330 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=33330 inliers=33330 rms 0.41 -> 0.41 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.007287, number_of_ambiguous_matches=356 33309 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=33309 inliers=33309 rms 0.32 -> 0.32 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.003173, number_of_ambiguous_matches=155 33288 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 179.712 48856 stars detected, 33288 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 31387, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 31387 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 31376 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00001*X_pix +0.00000*Y_pix -0.06878 Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)... Computing robust linear magnitude calibration. Used 27060 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -6.79 63726 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) Magnitude calibration is performed successfully! Saving observations to the cache... OK memory: 233604 kB used, 269940 kB peak, 65261732 kB available RAM processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-21T03:17:56.5777245 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-21T03:17:56.5777245 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-10-21T03:17:56.577 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits The star 7641.154 21.572 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8282.748 17.398 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8276.419 17.313 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8347.702 10.156 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7522.201 11.249 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7685.329 6.492 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7563.714 3.081 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8339.365 1.877 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8259.978 11.943 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8556.111 38.902 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 6530 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 1 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 3798 * rejected close to frame edge: 26 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.8 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 17 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 6530 * detected, using 100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000016, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=6355 inliers=6355 rms 1.02 -> 0.32 pix, max corner correction 3.6 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000016, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1 6354 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=6354 inliers=6354 rms 0.30 -> 0.30 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000016, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1 6353 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=6353 inliers=6353 rms 0.28 -> 0.28 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0 6348 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = -179.295 6530 stars detected, 6348 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 4440, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 4440 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 3135 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = -0.00021*X_pix +0.00009*Y_pix +1.15375 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 3135 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.77  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  63726 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) memory: 226040 kB used, 269940 kB peak, 65261732 kB available RAM processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-21T03:19:08.2039639 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-21T03:19:08.2039639 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-10-21T03:19:08.203 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits The star 8350.131 16.493 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7566.145 9.503 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8341.765 7.472 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7667.667 2.743 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7781.845 4.383 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9056.353 2.970 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8880.387 1.867 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9238.570 2.684 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7769.443 1.337 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7524.518 17.731 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 7229 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 1 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 3854 * rejected close to frame edge: 16 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.7 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 19 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 7229 * detected, using 100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000016, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=7115 inliers=7115 rms 0.93 -> 0.31 pix, max corner correction 4.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000031, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2 7113 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=7113 inliers=7113 rms 0.28 -> 0.28 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000016, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1 7113 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=7113 inliers=7113 rms 0.28 -> 0.28 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000016, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1 7107 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = -179.275 7229 stars detected, 7107 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 5837, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 5837 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 4529 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = -0.00022*X_pix +0.00004*Y_pix +1.26932 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 4529 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.70  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  63726 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) memory: 226040 kB used, 269940 kB peak, 65261732 kB available RAM processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%) TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds Done with measurements! =) Total number of measurements 97014 (97014 measurements stored in RAM) Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory... Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files... TIMING lightcurve_write: 2 seconds The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory... Creating vast_image_details.log ... Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK Selecting the best aperture for each source Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 5286 stars Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 9804 stars Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 4641 stars Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 5585 stars Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 7972 stars done! =) TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make' Computing, please wait a bit ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 33138 objects, the longest string is 385 bytes. Allocating memory for resorting the file. ----***** VaST processing WARNING *****---- You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one. Please investigate this! ************************************************************** This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic messages printed above (or the vast*.log files): * How many of the input images are matched? * Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable? * Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent? You may run ./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings (star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration file, see various examples in the VaST directory). If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/ ************************************************************** Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1) _____________________ ERROR running VaST on the field Her-01-Q2b1x1 (less than 4 images processed) exp_start= 13.05.2026 08:12:21.538 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461173.84203169 ap= 4.8 rotation= 0.000 *detected= 48158 *matched= 48158 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-12-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0327.fits exp_start= 18.07.2026 05:44:59.084 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461239.73968847 ap= 4.7 rotation= 179.712 *detected= 48856 *matched= 33288 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-18_00-44-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits exp_start= 21.10.2026 03:17:56.577 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461334.63757612 ap= 4.8 rotation= -179.295 *detected= 6530 *matched= 6348 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-17-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits exp_start= 21.10.2026 03:19:08.203 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461334.63840513 ap= 4.7 rotation= -179.275 *detected= 7229 *matched= 7107 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Her-01-Q2b1x1_223001_TTUQ2b1x1_488671_ZKBmzXbm/fd_Her-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_22-19-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits ########### Completed Her-01-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461334.63757612 -observatory V36 15:06:31.41 -20:47:43.1 Mercury (0.2mag) 13:49:56.08 -18:45:58.4 Venus (-4.3mag) 09:01:52.86 +18:20:56.3 Mars (1.0mag) 09:40:16.83 +14:37:53.7 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:39:43.37 +01:20:05.4 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:10:56.55 +20:55:03.6 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:09:25.72 -00:31:27.4 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:10.50 -23:43:06.8 Pluto (14.5mag) 21:48:14.27 -14:10:21.7 Moon (-11.1mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 20 22:32 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461334.63757612: 09:40:23.71 +14:37:15.7 Io (6.1mag) 09:40:11.78 +14:38:21.4 Europa (6.2mag) 09:40:15.37 +14:38:02.6 Ganymede (5.5mag) 09:40:33.01 +14:36:25.8 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:40:45.45 +14:54:53.1 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:40:20.78 +14:37:33.2 Thebe (16.4mag) 09:39:19.69 +15:01:28.8 Elara (17.5mag) 09:42:03.88 +14:01:52.9 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:38:11.82 +15:07:16.6 Carme (18.8mag) 00:39:54.83 +01:19:56.8 Titan (8.2mag) 00:39:41.61 +01:20:08.6 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:39:38.87 +01:18:04.3 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:39:59.16 +01:19:42.1 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:37:58.81 +01:07:40.2 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 20 22:32 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461334.63757612: 03:44:12.24 +20:14:23.4 JWST 14:15:19.13 +54:27:42.3 Chandra 10:20:55.30 -57:00:12.4 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 20 22:32 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461334.63757612 -observatory V36 03:42:11.30 +20:10:12.4 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:41:06.44 +37:30:03.0 18.0mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill) 07:41:11.42 +37:29:50.4 18.0mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 07:40:32.53 +37:30:02.4 18.0mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill) 05:02:15.35 +40:59:20.3 18.0mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski) 18:33:56.95 -33:15:13.0 14.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:43:06.34 -73:02:41.5 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:14:26.83 +34:56:01.3 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:42:51.69 +48:15:08.9 17.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 07:33:23.03 +25:22:46.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:05:50.46 +36:46:23.5 16.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:29:49.48 +41:09:04.8 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:45:57.82 -13:39:54.1 16.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:35:39.38 +15:12:05.3 16.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 14:01:00.85 -03:31:39.2 16.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 19:22:37.93 +60:49:07.5 15.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:25:03.53 +41:43:50.2 18.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:55:00.61 +15:18:21.4 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:25:10.23 -50:16:27.6 13.5mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 19:22:00.43 -05:04:20.6 14.7mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS) 00:02:08.73 +17:15:23.6 17.3mag 2P/Encke 23:09:30.66 -29:22:11.2 14.9mag 10P/Tempel 02:23:49.72 +36:20:18.7 16.5mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:17:41.53 -08:57:31.9 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:16:38.50 -09:04:10.4 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 07:47:41.93 +14:57:58.2 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 02:49:37.33 +13:49:24.1 17.8mag 88P/Howell 08:14:12.41 +42:51:58.0 17.0mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:24:29.61 +10:35:33.3 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 12:00:47.64 +11:02:02.3 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 14:31:40.54 -34:52:24.6 17.9mag 124P/Mrkos 20:34:44.90 +09:42:43.6 9.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:42:25.86 -00:31:54.0 15.2mag 169P/NEAT 03:22:42.45 +03:25:34.8 15.0mag 220P/McNaught 06:15:40.40 +47:16:20.4 15.5mag 260P/McNaught 07:41:03.45 +25:22:06.5 17.8mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.8K Oct 20 22:32 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 20 22:32 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag 05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag 05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 20 22:32 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 16:33:54.937 +20:21:19.93 AT 2026adyo 2026-10-01.22 18.471 15:12:55.339 +35:26:19.35 AT 2026adyn 2026-10-02.22 18.803 22:27:56.363 +38:36:11.47 AT 2026adym 2026-09-15.32 20.54 01:57:30.981 -22:32:19.78 AT 2026adyl 2026-09-05.53 20.9 18:00:55.941 +52:22:30.66 AT 2026adyk 2026-09-05.27 20.6 03:26:38.818 -27:16:41.69 AT 2026adyj 2026-09-05.59 21.1 23:12:58.798 -28:24:24.33 AT 2026adyi 2026-09-04.42 20.73 20:04:39.993 -23:13:07.01 AT 2026adyh 2026-09-29.19 19.8534 23:02:49.544 -27:01:30.13 AT 2026adyg 2026-09-04.42 21.06 00:48:19.388 +09:14:18.05 AT 2026adyf 2026-09-03.40 21.12 03:04:16.460 -25:36:53.81 AT 2026adye 2026-09-05.58 20.91 03:51:14.641 -29:54:43.32 AT 2026adyd 2026-09-05.59 21.03 19:51:37.151 -24:14:08.83 AT 2026adyc 2026-09-04.26 20.43 23:01:33.774 -16:23:29.58 AT 2026adyb 2026-09-05.36 21.18 17:33:59.236 +41:10:38.61 AT 2026adya 2026-09-04.28 21.02 17:15:41.351 +39:47:14.19 AT 2026adxz 2026-09-04.27 20.68 00:40:25.304 -19:35:36.26 AT 2026adxy 2026-09-04.46 21.24 17:56:26.542 +22:26:25.77 AT 2026adxx 2026-09-09.27 20.14 22:02:30.021 -25:23:35.10 AT 2026adxw 2026-09-03.36 20.84 23:27:43.503 -06:10:58.98 AT 2026adxv 2026-09-03.44 20.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 20 22:32 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 88 C