This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.0503 2461334.5503 10.16 19:58:43.11 -13:44:04.4
27.82314 -21.00393 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3 Juno 0 -0 1 10.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:58:43.11 -13:44:04.4: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:58:43.11 -13:44:04.4: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.5503,10.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.0503 10.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.0503 2461334.5503 13.62 19:54:09.28 -10:31:45.3
30.42281 -18.65055 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.345 Tercidina 0 -1 1 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:54:09.28 -10:31:45.3: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:54:09.28 -10:31:45.3: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.5503,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.0503 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 21.0503 2461334.5503 14.39 19:52:13.29 -13:02:47.7
27.79760 -19.28074 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.313 Chaldaea -2 -0 2 14.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:52:13.29 -13:02:47.7: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:52:13.29 -13:02:47.7: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461334.5503,14.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261021.0503 14.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.76742150 13.07.2026 06:24:55.218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
First image: 2461234.76742150 13.07.2026 06:24:55.218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Last image: 2461334.55058323 21.10.2026 01:12:40.391 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 16
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14737
Objects passed selection criteria: 14687
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10744.2
Average stars matched: 9991.5 (92.9939 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239844 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 20 20:24:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.76742150 13.07.2026 06:24:55.218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
First image: 2461234.76742150 13.07.2026 06:24:55.218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Last image: 2461334.55058323 21.10.2026 01:12:40.391 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 123
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 44 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 134771
Objects passed selection criteria: 134443
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 103851
Average stars matched: 96115.8 (92.5518 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 586968 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 20 20:25:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461334.54991863
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:50.079 -09:59:56.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45
Second-epoch image center 19:42:50.079 -09:59:56.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0173 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:47.694 -10:00:08.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45
Second-epoch image center 19:42:47.694 -10:00:08.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0275 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:42:50.079 -09:59:56.73
Second-epoch second image center 19:42:47.694 -10:00:08.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01032 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8PBTR7cOhY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q6n1PAFNkT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.plFNffLSEG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wf79CdJ4Qw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 17193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6609 to 303.8040 deg, Dec -15.2497 to -4.6824 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6609 to 303.8040 deg, Dec -15.2497 to -4.6824 deg
Loaded 11410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9135 out of 9587 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9587 out of 17193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.678300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.678300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 17193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6609 to 303.8040 deg, Dec -15.2497 to -4.6824 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6609 to 303.8040 deg, Dec -15.2497 to -4.6824 deg
Loaded 11410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9135 out of 9587 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9587 out of 17193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 17184 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6555 to 303.8043 deg, Dec -15.2619 to -4.6821 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6555 to 303.8043 deg, Dec -15.2619 to -4.6821 deg
Loaded 11423 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9132 out of 9602 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9602 out of 17184 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
2.3 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
15.1 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.8PBTR7cOhY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1083, bad_region=3020, passed=17193
Got 17193 stars (including 13227 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5375)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.441 n_q1=1847 n_q2=720 n_q3=1530 n_q4=791 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4888 N_valid=4888 bias_ra_arcsec=0.026 bias_dec_arcsec=0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.369 p95_sep_arcsec=1.888 n_q1=1847 n_q2=720 n_q3=1530 n_q4=791 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Q6n1PAFNkT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1110, bad_region=3013, passed=17184
Got 17184 stars (including 13206 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17184 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.454 n_q1=1832 n_q2=720 n_q3=1529 n_q4=804 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.161
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4885 N_valid=4885 bias_ra_arcsec=0.031 bias_dec_arcsec=0.007 median_sep_arcsec=0.378 p95_sep_arcsec=1.828 n_q1=1832 n_q2=720 n_q3=1529 n_q4=804 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.plFNffLSEG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=596, bad_region=3025, passed=10516
Got 10516 stars (including 7023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10516 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=7.436 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.660 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.660 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.466 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.800 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.800 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.388 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.541 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.541 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4882 robust_rms_before=0.669 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.420 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.388 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.581 worst_region_rms_after=0.541 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.076 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.541
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.581 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.581 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.420 arcsec matched=4882
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.463 n_q1=1567 n_q2=961 n_q3=1336 n_q4=1018 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4882 N_valid=4882 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.074 bias_dec_arcsec=0.417 median_sep_arcsec=0.583 p95_sep_arcsec=1.839 n_q1=1567 n_q2=961 n_q3=1336 n_q4=1018 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wf79CdJ4Qw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=629, bad_region=3103, passed=10495
Got 10495 stars (including 6896 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=7.465 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.894 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.894 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.493 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.853 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.853 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.549 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.549 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4880 robust_rms_before=0.689 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.442 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.404 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.583 worst_region_rms_after=0.549 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.191 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.549
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.583 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.583 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.442 arcsec matched=4880
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.494 n_q1=1578 n_q2=959 n_q3=1328 n_q4=1015 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.276
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4880 N_valid=4880 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.069 bias_dec_arcsec=0.430 median_sep_arcsec=0.614 p95_sep_arcsec=1.970 n_q1=1578 n_q2=959 n_q3=1328 n_q4=1015 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits sigma_overall=0.499 worst_q_ratio=1.123
ref2=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits sigma_overall=0.510 worst_q_ratio=1.161
new1=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits sigma_overall=0.411 worst_q_ratio=1.262
new2=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits sigma_overall=0.436 worst_q_ratio=1.276
reference average sigma_overall=0.5045 worst_q_ratio=1.142
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042_astrometric_residuals.png (4888 matched stars from wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043_astrometric_residuals.png (4885 matched stars from wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028_astrometric_residuals.png (4882 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029_astrometric_residuals.png (4880 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:58:43.11 -13:44:04.4: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:24:51.14 -08:05:21.6: 11.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:58:43.11 -13:44:04.4: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:24:51.14 -08:05:21.6: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:24:51.14 -08:05:21.6: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7701 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21422.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21422_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 21422_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21600_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 21600_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:39.99 -07:34:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21635_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 21635_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:38.02 -13:45:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21714_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 21714_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:49.85 -09:50:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21809_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 21809_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:33.15 -11:37:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21852_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 21852_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:38:32.80 -09:57:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21995_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 21995_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:39.65 -12:24:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22072_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 22072_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:25.78 -14:06:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22150_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 22150_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:47.41 -08:00:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22437_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 22437_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:31.03 -08:45:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22533_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 22533_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:12.38 -07:34:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22800_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 22800_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:45.08 -06:13:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22854_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 22854_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07365_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 07365_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:25.86 -10:58:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12786_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 12786_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:06.24 -07:36:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aql-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:58:43.11 -13:44:04.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:50.079 -09:59:56.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45
Second-epoch image center 19:42:50.079 -09:59:56.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0173 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:47.694 -10:00:08.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45
Second-epoch image center 19:42:47.694 -10:00:08.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0275 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:42:50.079 -09:59:56.73
Second-epoch second image center 19:42:47.694 -10:00:08.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01032 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e5nLxCc7CN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits &> /tmp/tmp.atheEKu1m2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9pZt5GuNdz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fF1dOSxt6k
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151351 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6570 to 303.8111 deg, Dec -15.2567 to -4.6708 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6570 to 303.8111 deg, Dec -15.2567 to -4.6708 deg
Loaded 11427 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8227 out of 10219 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10219 out of 151351 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.506000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.506000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151351 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6570 to 303.8111 deg, Dec -15.2567 to -4.6708 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6570 to 303.8111 deg, Dec -15.2567 to -4.6708 deg
Loaded 11427 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8227 out of 10219 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10219 out of 151351 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 152274 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6475 to 303.8112 deg, Dec -15.2629 to -4.6821 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6475 to 303.8112 deg, Dec -15.2629 to -4.6821 deg
Loaded 11432 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8206 out of 10213 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10213 out of 152274 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 85 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
2.1 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
15.2 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.e5nLxCc7CN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=14347, bad_region=18371, passed=151324
Got 151324 stars (including 119848 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 137711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 137711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 137711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.444 n_q1=1844 n_q2=722 n_q3=1500 n_q4=843 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4909 N_valid=4909 bias_ra_arcsec=0.027 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.364 p95_sep_arcsec=1.667 n_q1=1844 n_q2=722 n_q3=1500 n_q4=843 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.atheEKu1m2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=14548, bad_region=18413, passed=152258
Got 152258 stars (including 120597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 152258 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 138572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 138572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 138572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4903 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits N_match=4903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=1840 n_q2=734 n_q3=1493 n_q4=836 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4903 N_valid=4903 bias_ra_arcsec=0.035 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.374 p95_sep_arcsec=1.640 n_q1=1840 n_q2=734 n_q3=1493 n_q4=836 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9pZt5GuNdz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=6330, bad_region=19495, passed=93085
Got 93085 stars (including 69105 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 93085 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78672 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=7.339 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.606 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.606 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.474 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.888 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.888 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.389 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.559 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.559 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4897 robust_rms_before=0.680 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.417 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.389 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.597 worst_region_rms_after=0.559 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.091 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.559
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.597 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.597 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.417 arcsec matched=4897
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.467 n_q1=1591 n_q2=913 n_q3=1391 n_q4=1002 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.249
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4897 N_valid=4897 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.078 bias_dec_arcsec=0.430 median_sep_arcsec=0.600 p95_sep_arcsec=1.797 n_q1=1591 n_q2=913 n_q3=1391 n_q4=1002 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fF1dOSxt6k (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=6757, bad_region=20165, passed=97599
Got 97599 stars (including 72783 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 97599 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4901 robust_rms=7.337 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.996 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.996 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4901 robust_rms=0.496 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.891 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.891 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4901 robust_rms=0.403 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.560 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.560 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4901 robust_rms_before=0.698 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.431 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.403 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.588 worst_region_rms_after=0.560 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.172 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.560
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.588 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.588 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.431 arcsec matched=4901
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.489 n_q1=1604 n_q2=889 n_q3=1403 n_q4=1005 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.256
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4901 N_valid=4901 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.069 bias_dec_arcsec=0.440 median_sep_arcsec=0.623 p95_sep_arcsec=1.819 n_q1=1604 n_q2=889 n_q3=1403 n_q4=1005 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-11-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_202202_TTUQ2b1x1_3335120_mb0pNsX0/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:35:11.23 -12:31:15.2: 13.82 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:47:13.17 -06:41:34.0: 14.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:38:20.68 -10:16:53.5: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:27:54.52 -12:22:43.7: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:42:08.84 -07:41:55.3: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:48:46.84 -06:33:11.8: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:54:54.49 -13:00:55.3: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:34:49.77 -12:52:11.6: 13.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:35:11.23 -12:31:15.2: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:47:13.17 -06:41:34.0: 14.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:34:49.77 -12:52:11.6: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:27:54.52 -12:22:43.7: 13.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:54:54.49 -13:00:55.3: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:59:36.05 -11:28:32.7: 13.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:48:46.84 -06:33:11.8: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:38:20.68 -10:16:53.5: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:42:08.84 -07:41:55.3: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:35:11.23 -12:31:15.2: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1062 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:34:49.77 -12:52:11.6: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7565 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:13.17 -06:41:34.0: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3590 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:54.52 -12:22:43.7: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6122 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:54.49 -13:00:55.3: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1147 delta=-0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:46.84 -06:33:11.8: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9346 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:20.68 -10:16:53.5: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8320 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:08.84 -07:41:55.3: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9220 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:34:50.24 -14:08:49.1: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:59:36.05 -11:28:32.7: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:36.05 -11:28:32.7: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8258 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:34:50.24 -14:08:49.1: 13.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:34:50.24 -14:08:49.1: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5793 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:38:03.42 -14:08:57.9: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:56:33.96 -11:39:29.2: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:54:21.61 -12:21:46.7: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:53:39.26 -14:07:57.0: 13.40 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:57:36.63 -12:19:33.2: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:57:59.76 -10:27:21.5: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:52:35.19 -12:38:43.1: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:38:03.42 -14:08:57.9: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:03.42 -14:08:57.9: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6123 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 20:01:00.04 -09:22:49.2: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:54:21.61 -12:21:46.7: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:21.61 -12:21:46.7: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7499 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:57:36.63 -12:19:33.2: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:56:33.96 -11:39:29.2: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:57:59.76 -10:27:21.5: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:36.63 -12:19:33.2: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8610 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:33.96 -11:39:29.2: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5851 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:59.76 -10:27:21.5: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5985 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:53:39.26 -14:07:57.0: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:39.26 -14:07:57.0: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6671 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:31:43.15 -13:52:35.3: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:52:35.19 -12:38:43.1: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:35.19 -12:38:43.1: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5379 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 20:01:00.04 -09:22:49.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:00.04 -09:22:49.2: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4705 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:31:43.15 -13:52:35.3: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:31:43.15 -13:52:35.3: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3231 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:47:06.84 -12:28:41.3: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:53:36.68 -09:19:50.6: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:44:33.30 -11:55:07.4: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:47:06.84 -12:28:41.3: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:06.84 -12:28:41.3: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2652 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:53:36.68 -09:19:50.6: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:36.68 -09:19:50.6: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0438 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:44:33.30 -11:55:07.4: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:33.30 -11:55:07.4: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7055 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:26:42.83 -07:44:00.8: 13.62 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 20:00:42.85 -10:35:21.3: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:50:12.20 -10:01:35.6: 13.68 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:54:09.28 -10:31:45.3: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:55:33.77 -14:06:41.1: 14.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:38:04.75 -14:09:09.9: 14.14 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:26:42.83 -07:44:00.8: 13.67 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:42.83 -07:44:00.8: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5698 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:58:51.37 -06:48:01.9: 13.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 20:00:42.85 -10:35:21.3: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:50:12.20 -10:01:35.6: 13.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:54:09.28 -10:31:45.3: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:42.85 -10:35:21.3: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9228 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:12.20 -10:01:35.6: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7086 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:55:33.77 -14:06:41.1: 14.09 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:59:04.90 -12:51:01.4: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:33.77 -14:06:41.1: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9260 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:53:14.82 -07:57:06.9: 14.11 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:53:15.34 -11:31:21.3: 14.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:38:04.75 -14:09:09.9: 14.01 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:04.75 -14:09:09.9: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0951 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:58:51.37 -06:48:01.9: 13.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:51.37 -06:48:01.9: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9607 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:59:04.90 -12:51:01.4: 14.48 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:04.90 -12:51:01.4: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1390 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:53:14.82 -07:57:06.9: 14.02 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:53:15.34 -11:31:21.3: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:14.82 -07:57:06.9: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1864 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:15.34 -11:31:21.3: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3617 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:49:28.95 -14:01:35.2: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:54:31.49 -09:31:11.6: 14.74 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:56:43.25 -12:32:44.8: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:52:13.29 -13:02:47.7: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:30:08.61 -11:22:27.5: 14.38 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:37:29.07 -08:49:47.5: 15.01 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:49:28.95 -14:01:35.2: 14.54 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:54:31.49 -09:31:11.6: 14.46 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:49:28.95 -14:01:35.2: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2904 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:31.49 -09:31:11.6: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4307 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:56:43.25 -12:32:44.8: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:43.25 -12:32:44.8: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5703 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:52:13.29 -13:02:47.7: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:37:29.07 -08:49:47.5: 15.19 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:30:08.61 -11:22:27.5: 14.30 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:37:29.07 -08:49:47.5: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.4900 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:08.61 -11:22:27.5: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3341 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 20:01:20.61 -14:03:00.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 20:01:20.61 -14:03:00.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:20.61 -14:03:00.1: the position falls in a bad CCD region (bad_region.lst) on all measured reference images -- cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out184149.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out189898.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175156_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175156_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175159_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175159_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:14.79 -05:47:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175169_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175169_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175176_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175176_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175177_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175177_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175195_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175195_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175197_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175197_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175201_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175201_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175204_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175204_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175208_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175208_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175211_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175211_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:05.02 -12:41:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175212_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175212_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175218_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175218_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175219_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175219_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175221_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175221_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175222_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175222_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175223_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175223_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:57.67 -14:02:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175225_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175225_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175228_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175228_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:31.86 -11:56:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175231_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175231_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175232_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175232_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175234_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175234_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175235_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175235_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175239_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175239_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175241_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175241_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175243_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175243_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175246_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175246_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175252_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175252_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:13.48 -12:14:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175253_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175253_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175256_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175256_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:51.14 -11:58:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175257_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175257_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:35.84 -13:25:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175258_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175258_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:30.19 -06:49:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175584_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175584_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:43.11 -13:44:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175886_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175886_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:39.98 -07:34:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176293_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 176293_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:25.78 -14:06:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176385_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 176385_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:47.41 -08:00:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178453_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 178453_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:31.25 -08:40:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179199_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 179199_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:17.36 -06:58:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179432_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 179432_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:48.35 -07:03:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179482_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 179482_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:37:08.93 -09:54:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181011_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 181011_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:28.42 -07:03:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182048_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 182048_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:51:58.80 -10:22:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182079_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 182079_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:44.45 -13:05:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182528_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 182528_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:40.85 -07:43:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183528_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 183528_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:51:05.84 -08:29:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183770_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 183770_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:54.26 -09:54:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183827_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 183827_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:27.28 -12:29:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184020_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 184020_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:52:37.97 -13:18:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184149_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 184149_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184597_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 184597_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184672_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 184672_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:00.78 -10:34:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185283_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 185283_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185893_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 185893_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186228_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 186228_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:21.00 -08:57:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186492_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 186492_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186554_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 186554_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:56.20 -07:52:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186885_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 186885_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187178_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 187178_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:32:19.95 -08:22:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187727_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 187727_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187852_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 187852_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188018_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 188018_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188384_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 188384_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189067_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 189067_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189312_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 189312_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189715_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 189715_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189864_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 189864_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189898_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 189898_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189988_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 189988_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190019_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 190019_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55518_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 55518_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:25.86 -10:58:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16413_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 16413_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:38.02 -13:45:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71074_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 71074_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:38:32.80 -09:57:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164841_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 164841_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:12.39 -07:34:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91658_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 91658_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:33:06.09 -08:41:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173415_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 173415_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:18.85 -09:19:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44863_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 44863_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:33.15 -11:37:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120952_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 120952_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:22.86 -06:15:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143254_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 143254_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:33:54.52 -08:00:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12155_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 12155_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33784_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 33784_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:39.64 -12:24:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41852_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 41852_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:56.77 -11:48:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71723_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 71723_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:14.12 -09:53:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72531_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 72531_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:49.84 -09:50:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101359_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 101359_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:06.25 -07:36:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114614_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 114614_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_20-12-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks