This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 20.3897* 00 39 54.68 +01 21 06.3 7.0 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461333.8897,7.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261020.3897 7.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 20.3897* 00 40 07.60 +01 21 03.0 8.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461333.8897,8.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261020.3897 8.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 20.3897* 00 39 54.67 +01 21 06.0 7.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461333.8897,7.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261020.3897 7.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 20.3897* 00 40 07.59 +01 21 02.7 8.5 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461333.8897,8.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261020.3897 8.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 20.3897 2461333.8897 12.43 01:01:28.67 -05:45:24.3
129.75841 -68.49532 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 4.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.191 Kolga -0 -0 0 12.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:01:28.67 -05:45:24.3: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:01:28.67 -05:45:24.3: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 20.3897* 01 01 28.67 -05 45 24.3 12.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461333.8897,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261020.3897 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 20.3897 2461333.8897 12.71 00:51:23.50 +00:32:53.1
122.90702 -62.32366 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.58 Concordia -0 0 0 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:51:23.50 +00:32:53.1: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:51:23.50 +00:32:53.1: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 20.3897* 00 51 23.50 +00 32 53.1 12.7 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461333.8897,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261020.3897 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 20.3897 2461333.8897 13.78 01:01:26.16 -00:09:19.0
128.42926 -62.92026 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.522 Helga 0 -0 0 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:01:26.16 -00:09:19.0: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:01:26.16 -00:09:19.0: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 20.3897* 01 01 26.16 +00 09 19.0 13.8 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461333.8897,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261020.3897 13.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 20.3897 2461333.8897 14.43 00:41:44.65 -04:21:38.5
116.70772 -67.11522 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 4.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.155 Scylla -1 -1 1 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:41:44.65 -04:21:38.5: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:41:44.65 -04:21:38.5: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 20.3897* 00 41 44.65 -04 21 38.5 14.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461333.8897,14.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261020.3897 14.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461333.88999935 20.10.2026 09:21:25.944 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4060
Objects passed selection criteria: 4058
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3871.75
Average stars matched: 3819.75 (98.6569 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 231120 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 20 04:23:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461049.61732611 09.01.2026 02:48:46.976 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461333.88999935 20.10.2026 09:21:25.944 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 381
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 23055
Objects passed selection criteria: 23004
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 21485.2
Average stars matched: 20879.2 (97.1795 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249804 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 20 04:24:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461333.88940236
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.721 -02:00:03.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:25.721 -02:00:03.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0005 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:24.965 -02:00:26.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:24.965 -02:00:26.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0070 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:25.721 -02:00:03.36
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:24.965 -02:00:26.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00705 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UM4ytul8tu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZrHMIHSc7D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ma0o7VpprL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6tMzBJw1N7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5517 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to +3.3142 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to 3.3142 deg
Loaded 3965 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3364 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3364 out of 5517 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.864150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.864150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5517 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to +3.3142 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9633 to 20.7882 deg, Dec -7.2970 to 3.3142 deg
Loaded 3965 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3364 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3364 out of 5517 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 5460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9695 to 20.8088 deg, Dec -7.2935 to +3.3227 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9695 to 20.8088 deg, Dec -7.2935 to 3.3227 deg
Loaded 3971 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3212 out of 3360 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3360 out of 5460 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
2.0 pix Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
15.4 mag. Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.UM4ytul8tu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=396, bad_region=1270, passed=5517
Got 5517 stars (including 3949 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5517 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 3862 stars left (next iteration limit 4248)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=3862 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.229 n_q1=1232 n_q2=744 n_q3=1161 n_q4=725 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.239
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3862 N_valid=3862 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.224 p95_sep_arcsec=0.635 n_q1=1232 n_q2=744 n_q3=1161 n_q4=725 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZrHMIHSc7D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=414, bad_region=1257, passed=5460
Got 5460 stars (including 3880 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3799 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3799 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 3794 stars left (next iteration limit 4173)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits N_match=3794 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=1201 n_q2=734 n_q3=1146 n_q4=713 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.295
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3794 N_valid=3794 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.270 p95_sep_arcsec=0.781 n_q1=1201 n_q2=734 n_q3=1146 n_q4=713 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ma0o7VpprL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=260, bad_region=837, passed=4383
Got 4383 stars (including 3346 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4383 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3282 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3279 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3279 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3283 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3280 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3280 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 3280 stars left (next iteration limit 3606)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3280 robust_rms=7.703 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.028 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.028 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3280 robust_rms=0.444 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.663 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.663 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3280 robust_rms=0.346 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.406 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.406 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3280 robust_rms_before=0.923 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.300 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.346 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.393 worst_region_rms_after=0.406 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.190 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.406
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.393 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.393 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.300 arcsec matched=3280
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits N_match=3280 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=1099 n_q2=637 n_q3=934 n_q4=610 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.073
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3280 N_valid=3280 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.486 bias_dec_arcsec=0.594 median_sep_arcsec=0.881 p95_sep_arcsec=1.573 n_q1=1099 n_q2=637 n_q3=934 n_q4=610 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.6tMzBJw1N7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=280, bad_region=823, passed=4417
Got 4417 stars (including 3383 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4417 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3316 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3317 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 3313 stars left (next iteration limit 3643)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3313 robust_rms=7.566 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.508 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.508 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3313 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.563 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.563 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3313 robust_rms=0.341 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.415 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.415 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3313 robust_rms_before=0.921 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.308 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.341 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.386 worst_region_rms_after=0.415 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.122 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.415
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.386 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.386 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.308 arcsec matched=3313
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits N_match=3313 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.350 n_q1=1108 n_q2=639 n_q3=966 n_q4=600 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3313 N_valid=3313 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.517 bias_dec_arcsec=0.582 median_sep_arcsec=0.872 p95_sep_arcsec=1.547 n_q1=1108 n_q2=639 n_q3=966 n_q4=600 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits sigma_overall=0.264 worst_q_ratio=1.239
ref2=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits sigma_overall=0.314 worst_q_ratio=1.295
new1=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits sigma_overall=0.314 worst_q_ratio=1.073
new2=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits sigma_overall=0.321 worst_q_ratio=1.088
reference average sigma_overall=0.289 worst_q_ratio=1.267
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061_astrometric_residuals.png (3862 matched stars from wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062_astrometric_residuals.png (3794 matched stars from wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195_astrometric_residuals.png (3280 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196_astrometric_residuals.png (3313 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:53:24.39 -01:50:29.1: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:53:24.39 -01:50:29.1: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:53:24.39 -01:50:29.1: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0348 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20187_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
Preparing report for the candidate 20187_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20188_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
Preparing report for the candidate 20188_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20189_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 20189_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02496_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 02496_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:47:53.21 -01:18:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.721 -02:00:03.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:25.721 -02:00:03.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0005 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:24.965 -02:00:26.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.608 -02:00:02.80
Second-epoch image center 00:51:24.965 -02:00:26.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0070 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:25.721 -02:00:03.36
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:24.965 -02:00:26.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00705 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fPRjIclYYl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qtcQHpXscG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QOLkua8Wqw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NWBMpBlDDv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29514 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to +3.3164 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to 3.3164 deg
Loaded 3973 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3194 out of 3433 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3433 out of 29514 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.758700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.758700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29514 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to +3.3164 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9555 to 20.8043 deg, Dec -7.2973 to 3.3164 deg
Loaded 3973 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3194 out of 3433 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3433 out of 29514 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 30077 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9695 to 20.8139 deg, Dec -7.2935 to +3.3255 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9695 to 20.8139 deg, Dec -7.2935 to 3.3255 deg
Loaded 3973 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3182 out of 3441 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3441 out of 30077 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 243 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
1.9 pix Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
15.6 mag. Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.fPRjIclYYl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1068, bad_region=5575, passed=29508
Got 29508 stars (including 23045 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29508 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4859 stars left (next iteration limit 5344)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=4859 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.229 n_q1=1604 n_q2=899 n_q3=1497 n_q4=859 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4859 N_valid=4859 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.227 p95_sep_arcsec=0.612 n_q1=1604 n_q2=899 n_q3=1497 n_q4=859 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qtcQHpXscG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1115, bad_region=5717, passed=30066
Got 30066 stars (including 23434 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30066 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4858 stars left (next iteration limit 5342)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits N_match=4858 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=1593 n_q2=894 n_q3=1493 n_q4=878 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.269
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4858 N_valid=4858 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.273 p95_sep_arcsec=0.736 n_q1=1593 n_q2=894 n_q3=1493 n_q4=878 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QOLkua8Wqw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1084, bad_region=3425, passed=22441
Got 22441 stars (including 18430 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22441 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19842 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19842 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19842 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4809 stars left (next iteration limit 5289)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4809 robust_rms=7.462 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.999 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.999 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4809 robust_rms=0.463 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.702 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.702 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4809 robust_rms=0.364 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.427 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.427 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4809 robust_rms_before=0.934 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.319 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.364 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.408 worst_region_rms_after=0.427 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.203 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.427
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.408 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.408 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.319 arcsec matched=4809
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits N_match=4809 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=1662 n_q2=870 n_q3=1449 n_q4=828 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.091
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4809 N_valid=4809 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.486 bias_dec_arcsec=0.601 median_sep_arcsec=0.886 p95_sep_arcsec=1.578 n_q1=1662 n_q2=870 n_q3=1449 n_q4=828 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NWBMpBlDDv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1103, bad_region=3377, passed=22537
Got 22537 stars (including 18583 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22537 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4807 stars left (next iteration limit 5287)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4807 robust_rms=7.403 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.598 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.598 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4807 robust_rms=0.443 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.581 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.581 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4807 robust_rms=0.356 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.422 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.422 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4807 robust_rms_before=0.926 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.321 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.356 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.415 worst_region_rms_after=0.422 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.134 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.422
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.415 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.415 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.321 arcsec matched=4807
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits N_match=4807 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.363 n_q1=1653 n_q2=870 n_q3=1468 n_q4=816 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.082
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4807 N_valid=4807 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.508 bias_dec_arcsec=0.587 median_sep_arcsec=0.871 p95_sep_arcsec=1.549 n_q1=1653 n_q2=870 n_q3=1468 n_q4=816 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-20-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-20_CI_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_042156_TTUQ2b1x1_1374986_kCa9UyDu/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:01:28.67 -05:45:24.3: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:51:23.50 +00:32:53.1: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:01:28.67 -05:45:24.3: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:51:23.50 +00:32:53.1: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:06:10.52 +01:57:42.3: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:06:10.52 +01:57:42.3: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:06:10.52 +01:57:42.3: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0672 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:53:57.67 +02:02:20.2: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:53:57.67 +02:02:20.2: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:53:57.67 +02:02:20.2: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5052 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:01:26.16 -00:09:19.0: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:01:26.16 -00:09:19.0: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 01:07:04.48 +02:03:54.4: 15.33 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-48-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits at 00:41:44.65 -04:21:38.5: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:07:04.48 +02:03:54.4: 15.26 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:07:04.48 +02:03:54.4: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5629 delta=0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:41:44.65 -04:21:38.5: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31903.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31920.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32086.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32200.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31856_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
Preparing report for the candidate 31856_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31857_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
Preparing report for the candidate 31857_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31861_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31861_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31862_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31862_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31864_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31864_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31865_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31865_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31866_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31866_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31867_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31867_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31871_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31871_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31876_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31876_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31880_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31880_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31881_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31881_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31883_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31883_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31885_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31885_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31887_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31887_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31888_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31888_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31890_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31890_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31892_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31892_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31896_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31896_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31899_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31899_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31900_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31900_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31901_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31901_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31903_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
Preparing report for the candidate 31903_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31904_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31904_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31905_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31905_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31907_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31907_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31912_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31912_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31914_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31914_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31916_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31916_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31918_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31918_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31920_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
Preparing report for the candidate 31920_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31921_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31921_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31923_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31923_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31924_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31924_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31925_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31925_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31926_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31926_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31928_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31928_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31929_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31929_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31932_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31932_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31933_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31933_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31934_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31934_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31936_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31936_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31937_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31937_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31939_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31939_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31941_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31941_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31948_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31948_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31949_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31949_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31950_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31950_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31951_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31951_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31952_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31952_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31956_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31956_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31958_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31958_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31959_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31959_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31963_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31963_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31966_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31966_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31967_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31967_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31968_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31968_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31969_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31969_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31971_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31971_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31972_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31972_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31975_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31975_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31977_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31977_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31982_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31982_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31985_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31985_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31986_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31986_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31988_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31988_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31989_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31989_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31990_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31990_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31992_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31992_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31993_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31993_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31994_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31994_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31997_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31997_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31998_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 31998_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32000_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32000_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32002_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32002_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32003_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32003_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32004_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32004_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32005_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32005_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32007_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32007_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32009_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32009_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32010_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32010_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32012_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32012_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32015_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32015_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32018_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32018_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32019_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32019_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32022_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32022_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32024_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32024_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32026_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32026_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32027_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32027_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32028_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32028_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32030_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32030_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32033_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32033_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32034_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32034_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32035_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32035_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32038_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32038_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32042_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32042_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32045_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32045_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32047_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32047_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32049_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32049_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32050_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32050_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32051_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32051_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32052_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32052_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32054_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32054_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32057_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32057_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32059_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32059_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32060_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32060_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32062_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32062_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32064_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32064_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32065_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32065_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32070_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32070_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32071_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32071_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32072_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32072_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32074_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32074_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32075_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32075_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32076_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32076_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32077_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32077_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32079_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32079_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32080_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32080_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32082_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32082_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32083_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32083_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32084_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32084_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32085_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32085_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32086_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
Preparing report for the candidate 32086_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32087_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32087_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32089_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32089_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32090_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32090_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32091_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32091_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32092_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32092_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32093_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32093_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32094_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32094_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32096_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32096_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32097_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32097_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32098_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32098_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32099_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32099_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32102_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32102_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32103_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32103_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32104_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32104_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32105_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32105_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32108_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32108_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32109_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32109_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32110_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32110_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32111_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32111_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32113_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32113_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32114_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32114_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32116_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32116_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32118_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32118_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32119_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32119_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32120_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32120_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32121_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32121_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32122_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32122_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32123_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32123_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32124_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32124_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32126_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32126_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32127_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32127_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32129_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32129_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32130_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32130_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32132_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32132_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32133_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32133_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32136_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32136_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32138_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32138_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32141_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32141_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32144_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32144_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32147_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32147_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32149_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32149_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32150_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32150_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32151_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32151_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32152_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32152_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32153_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32153_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32154_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32154_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32156_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32156_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32157_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32157_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32158_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32158_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32160_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32160_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32162_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32162_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32164_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32164_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32165_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32165_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32166_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32166_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32168_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32168_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32169_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32169_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32170_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32170_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32174_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32174_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32175_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32175_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32176_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32176_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32177_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32177_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32178_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32178_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32180_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32180_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32181_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32181_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32182_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32182_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32183_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32183_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32184_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32184_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32186_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32186_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32188_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32188_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32189_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32189_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32191_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32191_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32192_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32192_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32195_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32195_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32197_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32197_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32198_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32198_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32199_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32199_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32200_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
Preparing report for the candidate 32200_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32201_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32201_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32202_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32202_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32204_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32204_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32205_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32205_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32206_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32206_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32207_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32207_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32208_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32208_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32210_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32210_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32213_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32213_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32215_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32215_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32216_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32216_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32217_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32217_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32219_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32219_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32220_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32220_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32221_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32221_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32227_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32227_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32228_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32228_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32233_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32233_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32235_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32235_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32242_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32242_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32243_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32243_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32244_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32244_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32245_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32245_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32246_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32246_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32247_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32247_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32250_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32250_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32251_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32251_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32253_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32253_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32256_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32256_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32260_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32260_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32262_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32262_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32266_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32266_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32268_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32268_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32272_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32272_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32273_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32273_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32279_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32279_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32281_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32281_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32284_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 32284_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28143_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 28143_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03523_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 03523_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:40.48 +02:09:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13585_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 13585_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:47:53.21 -01:18:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21635_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 21635_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04231_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196
The candidate 04231_fd_Cet-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-20_04-21-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0196 did not pass the final checks
