This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.3416 2461332.8416 11.66 03:35:21.30 +21:20:11.6
166.39735 -27.38285 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.64 Angelina -1 -0 1 11.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:35:21.30 +21:20:11.6: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:35:21.30 +21:20:11.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 19.3416* 03 35 21.30 +21 20 11.6 11.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.8416,11.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.3416 11.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.3416 2461332.8416 14.18 03:41:10.04 +23:51:58.4
165.66613 -24.59601 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.859 Bouzareah -0 -1 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:41:10.04 +23:51:58.4: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:41:10.04 +23:51:58.4: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 19.3416* 03 41 10.04 +23 51 58.4 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.8416,14.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.3416 14.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.3416 2461332.8416 14.60 03:30:12.77 +19:16:03.8
166.90613 -29.73526 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.310 Margarita 0 0 0 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:12.77 +19:16:03.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:12.77 +19:16:03.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 19.3416* 03 30 12.77 +19 16 03.8 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.8416,14.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.3416 14.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.3416 2461332.8416 14.63 03:41:35.25 +24:36:57.2
165.20277 -23.96928 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.228 Agathe -0 0 0 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:41:35.25 +24:36:57.2: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:41:35.25 +24:36:57.2: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 19.3416* 03 41 35.25 +24 36 57.2 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.8416,14.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.3416 14.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.3416 2461332.8416 14.91 03:31:20.90 +18:47:55.3
167.49456 -29.91245 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2069 Hubble -7 3 7 16.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:31:20.90 +18:47:55.3: 16.07 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:31:20.90 +18:47:55.3: 16.26 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.15 +/- 0.23
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 19.3416* 03 31 20.90 +18 47 55.3 14.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.8416,14.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.3416 14.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.3416 2461332.8416 15.16 03:34:31.04 +19:04:18.3
167.93163 -29.21130 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1202 Marina -1 0 1 15.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:31.04 +19:04:18.3: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:31.04 +19:04:18.3: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 19.3416* 03 34 31.04 +19 04 18.3 15.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.8416,15.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.3416 15.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.3416 2461332.8416 15.12 03:49:59.55 +18:47:48.8
171.17035 -26.90895 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1576 Fabiola 0 -1 1 15.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:59.55 +18:47:48.8: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:59.55 +18:47:48.8: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 19.3416* 03 49 59.55 +18 47 48.8 15.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.8416,15.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.3416 15.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461332.84187583 19.10.2026 08:12:08.072 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10901
Objects passed selection criteria: 10858
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8720.5
Average stars matched: 7970 (91.3938 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235776 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 19 03:20:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461332.84187583 19.10.2026 08:12:08.072 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 137
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.94
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 67440
Objects passed selection criteria: 67230
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 55100.8
Average stars matched: 50307.2 (91.3005 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 283796 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 19 03:21:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461332.84129767
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:32.945 +21:59:43.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:32.945 +21:59:43.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0028 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:34.451 +21:59:21.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:34.451 +21:59:21.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0097 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:32.945 +21:59:43.30
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:34.451 +21:59:21.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00844 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zc4Vr8ZVST
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pJwQqIvQI6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Gw6TbAxI8K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e1bXPnCv12
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.5175 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.5175 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4761 out of 5130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5130 out of 11315 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.zc4Vr8ZVST (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=882, bad_region=2358, passed=11324
Got 11324 stars (including 8232 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4928 stars left (next iteration limit 5420)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.233 n_q1=1932 n_q2=884 n_q3=1338 n_q4=774 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4928 N_valid=4928 bias_ra_arcsec=0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.009 median_sep_arcsec=0.249 p95_sep_arcsec=0.801 n_q1=1932 n_q2=884 n_q3=1338 n_q4=774 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pJwQqIvQI6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=893, bad_region=2356, passed=11315
Got 11315 stars (including 8229 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4927 stars left (next iteration limit 5419)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.244 n_q1=1928 n_q2=891 n_q3=1332 n_q4=776 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4927 N_valid=4927 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.013 median_sep_arcsec=0.262 p95_sep_arcsec=0.822 n_q1=1928 n_q2=891 n_q3=1332 n_q4=776 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Gw6TbAxI8K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=699, bad_region=2416, passed=11085
Got 11085 stars (including 8086 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11085 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4928 stars left (next iteration limit 5418)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4928 robust_rms=7.607 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.604 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.604 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4928 robust_rms=0.422 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.088 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.088 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4928 robust_rms=0.292 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.448 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.448 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4928 robust_rms_before=1.140 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.301 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.292 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.501 worst_region_rms_after=0.448 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.038 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.448
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.sip_refit.UbkiYY/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.sip_refit.UbkiYY/candidate.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:32.947 +21:59:42.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11085 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.sip_refit.UbkiYY/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_1801662.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.sip_refit.UbkiYY/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.qEh17W' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_1801662.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.140 -> 0.292 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4928 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4802 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4802 pairs (4928 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4802 robust_rms=7.570 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.535 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.535 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4802 robust_rms=0.420 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.072 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.072 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4802 robust_rms=0.290 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.447 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.447 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4802 robust_rms_before=0.290 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.290 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.290 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.446 worst_region_rms_after=0.447 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.446 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.447
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.447 vs 0.446 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits N_match=4802 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=1333 n_q2=807 n_q3=1442 n_q4=1220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4802 N_valid=4802 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.240 p95_sep_arcsec=0.793 n_q1=1333 n_q2=807 n_q3=1442 n_q4=1220 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.e1bXPnCv12 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=729, bad_region=2408, passed=10877
Got 10877 stars (including 7871 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10877 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4929 stars left (next iteration limit 5419)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4929 robust_rms=7.634 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.645 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.645 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4929 robust_rms=0.457 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.825 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.825 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4929 robust_rms=0.348 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.450 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.450 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4929 robust_rms_before=1.175 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.361 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.348 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.477 worst_region_rms_after=0.450 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.022 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.450
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.477 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.477 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.361 arcsec matched=4929
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits N_match=4929 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.415 n_q1=1363 n_q2=840 n_q3=1474 n_q4=1252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4929 N_valid=4929 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.378 bias_dec_arcsec=0.901 median_sep_arcsec=1.127 p95_sep_arcsec=1.805 n_q1=1363 n_q2=840 n_q3=1474 n_q4=1252 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.300 worst_q_ratio=1.268
ref2=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.303
new1=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits sigma_overall=0.307 worst_q_ratio=1.093
new2=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits sigma_overall=0.380 worst_q_ratio=1.093
reference average sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.2855
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (4928 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_astrometric_residuals.png (4927 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458_astrometric_residuals.png (4802 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459_astrometric_residuals.png (4929 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:43.08 +22:39:49.3: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:04.54 +21:12:57.2: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:34.48 +19:39:33.6: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:03.93 +22:50:50.3: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:35:21.30 +21:20:11.6: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:03.93 +22:50:50.3: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:35:21.30 +21:20:11.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:04.54 +21:12:57.2: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:43.08 +22:39:49.3: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:34.48 +19:39:33.6: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:03.93 +22:50:50.3: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3659 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:04.54 +21:12:57.2: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4248 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:34.48 +19:39:33.6: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0630 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:43.08 +22:39:49.3: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4544 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21409.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20925_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 20925_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:09.79 +24:29:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21409_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 21409_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21743_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 21743_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22062_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 22062_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22118_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 22118_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22159_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 22159_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
03:35:21.30 +21:20:11.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:32.947 +21:59:42.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:32.947 +21:59:42.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0031 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:34.451 +21:59:21.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:34.451 +21:59:21.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0097 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:32.947 +21:59:42.21
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:34.451 +21:59:21.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00822 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r22qzHCJt0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M4khu3akJB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FVLra8CATg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z5f1xAlzl1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.4774 to +27.2939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.4774 to 27.2939 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4354 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 71179 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.803800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.803800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.94
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.86
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.86
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.4774 to +27.2939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.4774 to 27.2939 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4354 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 71179 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 71492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6157 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4359 out of 5185 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5185 out of 71492 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 102 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.9 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.7 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.r22qzHCJt0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4312, bad_region=11991, passed=71162
Got 71162 stars (including 55414 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71162 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4935 stars left (next iteration limit 5428)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.232 n_q1=1851 n_q2=887 n_q3=1408 n_q4=789 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4935 N_valid=4935 bias_ra_arcsec=0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.006 median_sep_arcsec=0.240 p95_sep_arcsec=0.774 n_q1=1851 n_q2=887 n_q3=1408 n_q4=789 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.M4khu3akJB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4374, bad_region=12029, passed=71479
Got 71479 stars (including 55644 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71479 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4930 stars left (next iteration limit 5423)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.246 n_q1=1847 n_q2=888 n_q3=1401 n_q4=794 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4930 N_valid=4930 bias_ra_arcsec=0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.009 median_sep_arcsec=0.251 p95_sep_arcsec=0.813 n_q1=1847 n_q2=888 n_q3=1401 n_q4=794 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FVLra8CATg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3605, bad_region=11513, passed=62405
Got 62405 stars (including 48025 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62405 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4919 stars left (next iteration limit 5410)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=7.593 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.801 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.801 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=0.420 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.126 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.126 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=0.291 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.449 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.449 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4919 robust_rms_before=0.291 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.300 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.291 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.451 worst_region_rms_after=0.449 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.451 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.449
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.451 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.451 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.291 arcsec matched=4919
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits N_match=4919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.335 n_q1=1390 n_q2=863 n_q3=1472 n_q4=1194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4919 N_valid=4919 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.238 p95_sep_arcsec=0.930 n_q1=1390 n_q2=863 n_q3=1472 n_q4=1194 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Z5f1xAlzl1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3633, bad_region=11737, passed=63831
Got 63831 stars (including 49198 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63831 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4917 stars left (next iteration limit 5408)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=7.617 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.799 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.799 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=0.442 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.852 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.852 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=0.342 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.428 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.428 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4917 robust_rms_before=1.156 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.356 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.342 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.493 worst_region_rms_after=0.428 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.007 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.428
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 1.156 -> 0.342 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits is a symbolic link
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4917 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4786 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4786 pairs (4917 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4786 robust_rms=7.567 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.609 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.609 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4786 robust_rms=0.441 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.852 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.852 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4786 robust_rms=0.339 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.427 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.427 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4786 robust_rms_before=0.340 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.340 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.339 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.427 worst_region_rms_after=0.427 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.427 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.427
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.427 vs 0.427 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits N_match=4786 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.388 n_q1=1360 n_q2=830 n_q3=1428 n_q4=1168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4786 N_valid=4786 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.375 bias_dec_arcsec=0.892 median_sep_arcsec=1.101 p95_sep_arcsec=1.725 n_q1=1360 n_q2=830 n_q3=1428 n_q4=1168 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-11-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_031807_TTUQ2b1x1_1794181_pEOpbfYA/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:31:53.22 +20:11:25.6: 14.96 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:22:43.65 +26:02:29.3: 14.67 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:56.29 +18:05:37.9: 14.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:17.95 +23:42:06.4: 15.20 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:48.80 +26:02:35.3: 15.03 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:47:10.82 +26:12:32.0: 15.28 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:57:59.96 +22:59:38.3: 14.33 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:35:01.58 +24:37:20.4: 15.42 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:11.34 +19:57:02.5: 14.94 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:16.44 +21:22:29.1: 14.85 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:31:53.22 +20:11:25.6: 15.16 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:22:43.65 +26:02:29.3: 14.57 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:16.44 +21:22:29.1: 15.01 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:35:01.58 +24:37:20.4: 15.17 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:56.29 +18:05:37.9: 14.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:11.34 +19:57:02.5: 15.12 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:48.80 +26:02:35.3: 15.03 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:57:59.96 +22:59:38.3: 14.49 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:17.95 +23:42:06.4: 15.44 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:47:10.82 +26:12:32.0: 15.45 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:56.29 +18:05:37.9: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.7447 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:22:43.65 +26:02:29.3: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7588 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:53.22 +20:11:25.6: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9852 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:11.34 +19:57:02.5: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8195 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:48.80 +26:02:35.3: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9594 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:35:01.58 +24:37:20.4: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1695 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:10.82 +26:12:32.0: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9305 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:59.96 +22:59:38.3: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5602 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:17.95 +23:42:06.4: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1246 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:16.44 +21:22:29.1: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7773 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:34.89 +21:50:54.0: 14.36 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:37:19.87 +24:08:19.3: 14.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:56.69 +23:39:43.7: 14.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:38.60 +18:31:52.1: 13.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:09.21 +20:36:20.3: 14.59 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:57.15 +18:01:18.6: 14.56 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:34.89 +21:50:54.0: 14.39 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:38.60 +18:31:52.1: 13.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:57.15 +18:01:18.6: 14.62 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:34.89 +21:50:54.0: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5511 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:37:19.87 +24:08:19.3: 14.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:38.60 +18:31:52.1: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0280 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:56.69 +23:39:43.7: 14.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:57.15 +18:01:18.6: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4749 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:37:19.87 +24:08:19.3: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1400 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:56.69 +23:39:43.7: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3320 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:09.21 +20:36:20.3: 14.68 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:09.21 +20:36:20.3: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5598 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:37:59.92 +18:28:50.5: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:41:10.04 +23:51:58.4: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:52.16 +18:47:14.8: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:23.82 +19:48:46.3: 14.26 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:58:41.86 +23:51:22.5: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:43.16 +25:03:02.0: 14.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:37:59.92 +18:28:50.5: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:41:10.04 +23:51:58.4: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:37:59.92 +18:28:50.5: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8388 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:52.16 +18:47:14.8: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:52.16 +18:47:14.8: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9690 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:11.74 +19:50:30.7: 14.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:49.27 +25:53:24.2: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:31:25.15 +24:45:32.2: 14.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:23.82 +19:48:46.3: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:58:41.86 +23:51:22.5: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:23.82 +19:48:46.3: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2472 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:43.16 +25:03:02.0: 14.53 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:41.86 +23:51:22.5: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2790 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:43.16 +25:03:02.0: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3876 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:49.27 +25:53:24.2: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:11.74 +19:50:30.7: 14.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:49.27 +25:53:24.2: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3199 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:11.74 +19:50:30.7: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4253 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:27.20 +18:35:15.9: 14.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:31:25.15 +24:45:32.2: 14.84 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:25.15 +24:45:32.2: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5023 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:37:25.02 +25:22:10.2: 14.74 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:27.20 +18:35:15.9: 14.46 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:27.20 +18:35:15.9: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5004 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:12.77 +19:16:03.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:32.67 +19:11:26.9: 15.06 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:41:35.25 +24:36:57.2: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:37:25.02 +25:22:10.2: 14.73 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:52.95 +20:23:29.8: 15.15 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:37:25.02 +25:22:10.2: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6437 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:43:54.10 +22:17:59.8: 14.85 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:22.77 +21:30:42.3: 15.17 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:32.67 +19:11:26.9: 15.18 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:12.77 +19:16:03.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:32.67 +19:11:26.9: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7705 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:41:35.25 +24:36:57.2: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:52.95 +20:23:29.8: 15.14 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:52.95 +20:23:29.8: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9405 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:43:54.10 +22:17:59.8: 14.86 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:54.10 +22:17:59.8: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7174 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:35:58.63 +19:20:40.9: 14.93 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:22.77 +21:30:42.3: 15.11 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:22.77 +21:30:42.3: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8976 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:31:20.90 +18:47:55.3: 16.07 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:27:35.70 +22:53:33.9: 15.22 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:35:58.63 +19:20:40.9: 15.05 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:35:58.63 +19:20:40.9: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8554 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:59:32.55 +22:13:08.7: 14.99 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:31:20.90 +18:47:55.3: 16.26 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.15 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:31:20.90 +18:47:55.3: ref_mag=16.15 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=14.9056 delta=1.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:50:46.04 +26:01:57.9: 14.64 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:24.70 +24:46:04.8: 14.95 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:27:35.70 +22:53:33.9: 15.22 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:27:35.70 +22:53:33.9: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0151 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:59:32.55 +22:13:08.7: 14.90 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:32.55 +22:13:08.7: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8891 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:56:59.56 +22:03:20.2: 15.51 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:50:46.04 +26:01:57.9: 14.59 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:46.04 +26:01:57.9: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7008 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:45:20.95 +18:58:35.9: 15.28 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:24.70 +24:46:04.8: 14.88 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:24.70 +24:46:04.8: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9918 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:56:59.56 +22:03:20.2: 15.53 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:59.56 +22:03:20.2: ref_mag=15.52 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0022 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:43:13.71 +26:03:02.0: 15.24 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:45:20.95 +18:58:35.9: 15.11 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:20.95 +18:58:35.9: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1034 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:42.74 +24:57:37.9: 15.28 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:59.98 +21:08:05.3: 15.53 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:43:13.71 +26:03:02.0: 15.25 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:13.71 +26:03:02.0: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0569 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:42.74 +24:57:37.9: 15.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:42.74 +24:57:37.9: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9933 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:31.04 +19:04:18.3: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:59.98 +21:08:05.3: 15.56 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.54 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:59.55 +18:47:48.8: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:59.98 +21:08:05.3: ref_mag=15.54 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0309 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:58.57 +21:22:01.3: 15.25 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:31.04 +19:04:18.3: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:59.55 +18:47:48.8: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:58.57 +21:22:01.3: 15.13 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:39:20.22 +21:52:05.1: 15.45 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:58.57 +21:22:01.3: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.1442 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:50:45.34 +25:17:56.4: 15.44 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:39:20.22 +21:52:05.1: 15.17 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:20.22 +21:52:05.1: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1905 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:50:45.34 +25:17:56.4: 15.83 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:45.34 +25:17:56.4: ref_mag=15.57 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.1767 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:05.59 +23:45:25.0: 15.21 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:38:56.75 +20:24:06.3: 15.24 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:05.59 +23:45:25.0: 15.44 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:05.59 +23:45:25.0: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1678 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:38:56.75 +20:24:06.3: 15.17 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:10.67 +20:19:25.3: 15.49 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:56.75 +20:24:06.3: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0134 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:26:59.26 +20:40:13.1: 15.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:10.67 +20:19:25.3: 15.50 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:26:59.26 +20:40:13.1: 15.31 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:10.67 +20:19:25.3: ref_mag=15.50 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1064 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:59.26 +20:40:13.1: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.1746 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:42:43.15 +24:17:31.3: 15.28 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:42:43.15 +24:17:31.3: 15.19 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:43.15 +24:17:31.3: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1312 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92281.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94282.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out95132.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out96176.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out96790.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out96800.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86060_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86060_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86061_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86061_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86066_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86066_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86068_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86068_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86069_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86069_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86075_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86075_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86077_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86077_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86080_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86080_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86092_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86092_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86093_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86093_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86096_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86096_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86097_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86097_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86098_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86098_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86099_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86099_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86102_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86102_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86105_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86105_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86110_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86110_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:32:24.06 +20:37:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86113_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86113_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:23.82 +18:13:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86114_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86114_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:55.75 +25:00:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86587_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86587_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:09.79 +24:29:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86672_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86672_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87042_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 87042_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:21.30 +21:20:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87931_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 87931_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88166_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 88166_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88215_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 88215_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:40.53 +18:47:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88353_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 88353_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:07.72 +23:38:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88502_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 88502_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:39:54.76 +25:11:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88709_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 88709_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89022_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89022_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89178_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89178_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89296_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89296_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:56.19 +23:09:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89341_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89341_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:24.24 +22:45:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89532_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89532_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89542_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89542_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:50.30 +24:29:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89709_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89709_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:23.45 +24:31:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89720_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89720_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:12.96 +23:36:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89742_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89742_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89807_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89807_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89826_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89826_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:08.41 +23:20:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89857_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89857_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90735_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 90735_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90814_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 90814_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90819_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 90819_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90942_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 90942_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90947_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 90947_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91027_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 91027_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91408_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 91408_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:12.84 +25:15:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91419_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 91419_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91463_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 91463_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91765_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 91765_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92281_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 92281_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92409_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92409_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92521_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92521_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92552_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92552_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92599_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92599_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92671_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92671_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92798_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92798_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93058_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93058_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93085_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93085_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:23.22 +25:35:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93155_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93155_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93271_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93271_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93623_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93623_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93708_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93708_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93784_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93784_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94007_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94007_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94201_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94201_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94282_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 94282_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94628_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94628_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94786_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94786_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95132_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 95132_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95231_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95231_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95349_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95349_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95571_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95571_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95686_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95686_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95735_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95735_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95776_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95776_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95854_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95854_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96176_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 96176_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96179_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96179_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96248_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96248_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96253_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96253_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96277_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96277_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96399_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96399_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96441_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96441_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96531_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96531_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96583_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96583_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96689_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96689_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96709_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96709_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96749_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96749_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96790_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 96790_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96800_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 96800_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96828_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96828_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96829_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96829_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96897_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96897_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96945_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96945_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96949_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96949_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96952_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96952_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96953_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96953_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96958_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96958_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96974_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96974_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54149_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 54149_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85960_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 85960_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_03-12-08_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
