This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.7269,8.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.2269 8.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.7269,8.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.2269 8.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.2269 2461332.7269 13.77 23:51:45.50 -00:52:30.0
91.84428 -60.09425 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 2.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.551 Ortrud -0 0 0 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:51:45.50 -00:52:30.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:51:45.50 -00:52:30.0: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.7269,13.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.2269 13.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.2269 2461332.7269 14.72 00:10:43.40 -04:42:03.5
97.73644 -65.56132 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3133 Sendai -0 0 0 14.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:10:43.40 -04:42:03.5: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:10:43.40 -04:42:03.5: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.7269,14.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.2269 14.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.2269 2461332.7269 14.53 00:04:43.57 +00:23:56.2
98.84364 -60.26977 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1735 ITA -0 1 1 14.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:04:43.57 +00:23:56.2: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:04:43.57 +00:23:56.2: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.7269,14.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.2269 14.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
First image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Last image: 2461332.72715066 19.10.2026 05:26:55.817 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5369
Objects passed selection criteria: 5355
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4243
Average stars matched: 3843 (90.5727 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 231812 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 19 00:34:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
First image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Last image: 2461332.72715066 19.10.2026 05:26:55.817 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 215
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.12
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 28916
Objects passed selection criteria: 28812
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 23532.8
Average stars matched: 21167.5 (89.9491 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249944 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 19 00:35:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461332.72669544
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.214 -01:59:49.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.214 -01:59:49.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0079 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.449 -02:00:00.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.449 -02:00:00.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0046 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:00.214 -01:59:49.19
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:00.449 -02:00:00.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00341 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IHJJvQRsZp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XXMV29ULR7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ODh0ATgEBI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iL9ZGrM9eD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to +3.2742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to 3.2742 deg
Loaded 113496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 5537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.632850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.632850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to +3.2742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to 3.2742 deg
Loaded 113496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 5537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (aperture=6.3)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5464 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1355 to 7.8705 deg, Dec -7.2684 to +3.2771 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1355 to 7.8705 deg, Dec -7.2684 to 3.2771 deg
Loaded 113493 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3322 out of 3420 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3420 out of 5464 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
2.2 pix Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
15.3 mag. Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.IHJJvQRsZp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=342, bad_region=1203, passed=5537
Got 5537 stars (including 4070 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1391 through 0 to 7.8851, gap 7.8851 to 352.1391
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1393 through 0 to 7.8851, gap 7.8851 to 352.1393
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 3972 stars left (next iteration limit 4369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits N_match=3972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.283 n_q1=1263 n_q2=686 n_q3=1324 n_q4=699 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.153
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3972 N_valid=3972 bias_ra_arcsec=0.016 bias_dec_arcsec=0.020 median_sep_arcsec=0.260 p95_sep_arcsec=0.855 n_q1=1263 n_q2=686 n_q3=1324 n_q4=699 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.XXMV29ULR7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=354, bad_region=1178, passed=5461
Got 5461 stars (including 4010 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5461 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1355 through 0 to 7.8705, gap 7.8705 to 352.1355
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1357 through 0 to 7.8705, gap 7.8705 to 352.1357
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 3913 stars left (next iteration limit 4305)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits N_match=3913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=1258 n_q2=678 n_q3=1296 n_q4=681 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3913 N_valid=3913 bias_ra_arcsec=0.028 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.289 p95_sep_arcsec=0.913 n_q1=1258 n_q2=678 n_q3=1296 n_q4=681 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ODh0ATgEBI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=361, bad_region=1287, passed=5551
Got 5551 stars (including 3965 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5551 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1434 through 0 to 7.8728, gap 7.8728 to 352.1434
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1436 through 0 to 7.8730, gap 7.8730 to 352.1436
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 3874 stars left (next iteration limit 4261)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3874 robust_rms=7.554 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.623 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.623 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3874 robust_rms=0.393 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.584 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.584 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3874 robust_rms=0.300 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.344 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.344 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3874 robust_rms_before=0.826 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.301 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.300 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.342 worst_region_rms_after=0.344 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.072 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.344
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.342 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.342 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.301 arcsec matched=3874
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits N_match=3874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=1223 n_q2=775 n_q3=1156 n_q4=720 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.046
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3874 N_valid=3874 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.515 bias_dec_arcsec=0.501 median_sep_arcsec=0.790 p95_sep_arcsec=1.522 n_q1=1223 n_q2=775 n_q3=1156 n_q4=720 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.iL9ZGrM9eD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=358, bad_region=1283, passed=5502
Got 5502 stars (including 3930 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5502 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1441 through 0 to 7.8739, gap 7.8739 to 352.1441
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1443 through 0 to 7.8741, gap 7.8741 to 352.1443
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 3843 stars left (next iteration limit 4227)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3843 robust_rms=7.707 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.428 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.428 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3843 robust_rms=0.390 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.624 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.624 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3843 robust_rms=0.292 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.332 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.332 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3843 robust_rms_before=0.851 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.297 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.292 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.342 worst_region_rms_after=0.332 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.079 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.332
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.342 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.342 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.297 arcsec matched=3843
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits N_match=3843 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1210 n_q2=764 n_q3=1149 n_q4=720 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3843 N_valid=3843 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.550 bias_dec_arcsec=0.498 median_sep_arcsec=0.817 p95_sep_arcsec=1.489 n_q1=1210 n_q2=764 n_q3=1149 n_q4=720 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits sigma_overall=0.303 worst_q_ratio=1.153
ref2=Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits sigma_overall=0.351 worst_q_ratio=1.142
new1=fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits sigma_overall=0.310 worst_q_ratio=1.046
new2=fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits sigma_overall=0.310 worst_q_ratio=1.087
reference average sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.1475
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999_astrometric_residuals.png (3972 matched stars from wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000_astrometric_residuals.png (3913 matched stars from wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294_astrometric_residuals.png (3874 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295_astrometric_residuals.png (3843 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:58:44.45 -01:12:34.6: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:55:16.61 -02:28:32.9: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:01:53.60 -00:48:58.0: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:58:44.45 -01:12:34.6: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:01:53.60 -00:48:58.0: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:55:16.61 -02:28:32.9: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:58:44.45 -01:12:34.6: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0455 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:01:53.60 -00:48:58.0: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1240 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:16.61 -02:28:32.9: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1042 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20252_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 20252_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20836_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 20836_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:11:41.19 -01:44:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21017_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 21017_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21071_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 21071_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21091_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 21091_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.214 -01:59:49.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.214 -01:59:49.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0079 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.449 -02:00:00.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.449 -02:00:00.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0046 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:00.214 -01:59:49.19
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:00.449 -02:00:00.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00341 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cqm53CHVsA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eHIXvGnPE4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b0Km9Rl3pG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F57Ex4Mv6o
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 29281 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1384 to 7.8963 deg, Dec -7.2757 to +3.2741 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1384 to 7.8963 deg, Dec -7.2757 to 3.2741 deg
Loaded 113505 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3329 out of 3554 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3554 out of 29281 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.525300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.525300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.12
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 29281 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1384 to 7.8963 deg, Dec -7.2757 to +3.2741 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1384 to 7.8963 deg, Dec -7.2757 to 3.2741 deg
Loaded 113505 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3329 out of 3554 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3554 out of 29281 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (aperture=5.0)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 30046 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1258 to 7.8769 deg, Dec -7.2751 to +3.2772 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1258 to 7.8769 deg, Dec -7.2751 to 3.2772 deg
Loaded 113502 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3314 out of 3546 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3546 out of 30046 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 153 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
2.1 pix Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
15.4 mag. Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.cqm53CHVsA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1084, bad_region=5467, passed=29269
Got 29269 stars (including 22908 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29269 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1384 through 0 to 7.8963, gap 7.8963 to 352.1384
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1387 through 0 to 7.8963, gap 7.8963 to 352.1387
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4850 stars left (next iteration limit 5335)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits N_match=4850 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=1560 n_q2=873 n_q3=1533 n_q4=884 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4850 N_valid=4850 bias_ra_arcsec=0.025 bias_dec_arcsec=0.009 median_sep_arcsec=0.262 p95_sep_arcsec=0.828 n_q1=1560 n_q2=873 n_q3=1533 n_q4=884 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.eHIXvGnPE4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1265, bad_region=5561, passed=30034
Got 30034 stars (including 23398 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30034 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1258 through 0 to 7.8769, gap 7.8769 to 352.1258
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1262 through 0 to 7.8769, gap 7.8769 to 352.1262
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4854 stars left (next iteration limit 5339)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits N_match=4854 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=1568 n_q2=872 n_q3=1544 n_q4=870 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.153
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4854 N_valid=4854 bias_ra_arcsec=0.036 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.019 median_sep_arcsec=0.291 p95_sep_arcsec=0.875 n_q1=1568 n_q2=872 n_q3=1544 n_q4=870 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.b0Km9Rl3pG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1237, bad_region=4967, passed=28213
Got 28213 stars (including 22346 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28213 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1418 through 0 to 7.8781, gap 7.8781 to 352.1418
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4823 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1420 through 0 to 7.8784, gap 7.8784 to 352.1420
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4824 stars left (next iteration limit 5305)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4824 robust_rms=7.511 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.943 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.943 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4824 robust_rms=0.403 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.619 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.619 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4824 robust_rms=0.305 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.351 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.351 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4824 robust_rms_before=0.829 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.304 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.305 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.352 worst_region_rms_after=0.351 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.064 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.351
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.352 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.352 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.304 arcsec matched=4824
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits N_match=4824 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=1538 n_q2=930 n_q3=1484 n_q4=872 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.025
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4824 N_valid=4824 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.516 bias_dec_arcsec=0.505 median_sep_arcsec=0.792 p95_sep_arcsec=1.501 n_q1=1538 n_q2=930 n_q3=1484 n_q4=872 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.F57Ex4Mv6o (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1176, bad_region=4957, passed=28233
Got 28233 stars (including 22423 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28233 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1424 through 0 to 7.8800, gap 7.8800 to 352.1424
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1427 through 0 to 7.8803, gap 7.8803 to 352.1427
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4820 stars left (next iteration limit 5302)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4820 robust_rms=7.479 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.342 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.342 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4820 robust_rms=0.399 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.607 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.607 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4820 robust_rms=0.295 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.343 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.343 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4820 robust_rms_before=0.853 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.304 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.295 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.359 worst_region_rms_after=0.343 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.091 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.343
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.359 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.359 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.304 arcsec matched=4820
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits N_match=4820 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1532 n_q2=928 n_q3=1490 n_q4=870 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.074
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4820 N_valid=4820 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.545 bias_dec_arcsec=0.501 median_sep_arcsec=0.816 p95_sep_arcsec=1.497 n_q1=1532 n_q2=928 n_q3=1490 n_q4=870 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_003208_TTUQ2b1x1_538910_cOim5riA/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:16:01.52 -05:25:02.2: 14.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:49:56.08 +01:54:08.3: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:44:29.90 -04:38:48.1: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:16:01.52 -05:25:02.2: 14.10 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:44:29.90 -04:38:48.1: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:49:56.08 +01:54:08.3: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:54:52.11 +00:04:17.6: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:16:01.52 -05:25:02.2: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1099 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:49:56.08 +01:54:08.3: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2166 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:44:29.90 -04:38:48.1: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4199 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:54:52.11 +00:04:17.6: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:52.11 +00:04:17.6: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7490 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:47:44.01 +02:02:27.2: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:47:44.01 +02:02:27.2: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:51:45.50 -00:52:30.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:47:44.01 +02:02:27.2: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3942 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:56:27.64 -00:35:54.2: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:51:45.50 -00:52:30.0: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:56:27.64 -00:35:54.2: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:27.64 -00:35:54.2: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5789 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:47:40.54 -00:47:09.2: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:47:40.54 -00:47:09.2: 13.94 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:55:27.92 +01:40:47.0: 14.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:47:40.54 -00:47:09.2: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2627 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:00:36.97 +00:12:01.5: 14.23 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:55:27.92 +01:40:47.0: 14.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:27.92 +01:40:47.0: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4099 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:00:36.97 +00:12:01.5: 13.99 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:36.97 +00:12:01.5: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3768 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:10:43.40 -04:42:03.5: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:49:11.25 +00:46:47.6: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:04:43.57 +00:23:56.2: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:44:25.00 +00:57:38.0: 15.45 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:10:43.40 -04:42:03.5: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:44:24.32 -01:04:18.4: 14.93 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:57:20.33 -06:06:33.9: 14.44 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:04:43.57 +00:23:56.2: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:49:11.25 +00:46:47.6: 15.10 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:49:11.25 +00:46:47.6: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6818 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:44:25.00 +00:57:38.0: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:44:24.32 -01:04:18.4: 15.09 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:57:20.33 -06:06:33.9: 14.45 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:44:25.00 +00:57:38.0: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6720 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:44:24.32 -01:04:18.4: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6151 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:57:20.33 -06:06:33.9: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6081 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35306.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out37268.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out37421.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32303_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 32303_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32305_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 32305_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32307_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 32307_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32308_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 32308_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32310_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 32310_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32311_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 32311_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32340_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 32340_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32620_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 32620_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32799_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 32799_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33250_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 33250_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33346_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 33346_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33395_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 33395_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33540_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 33540_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33555_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 33555_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33669_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 33669_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33693_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 33693_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33769_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 33769_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33822_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 33822_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33838_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 33838_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33895_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 33895_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33908_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 33908_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33935_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 33935_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33988_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 33988_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33997_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 33997_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34060_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34060_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34064_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34064_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34078_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34078_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34112_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34112_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34120_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34120_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34166_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34166_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34195_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34195_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34304_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34304_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34355_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34355_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34400_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34400_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34411_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34411_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34435_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34435_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34504_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34504_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34511_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34511_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34563_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34563_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34569_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34569_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34578_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34578_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34581_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34581_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34582_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34582_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34597_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34597_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34650_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34650_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34705_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34705_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34836_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34836_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34907_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34907_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34913_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34913_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34927_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 34927_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35059_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35059_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35060_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35060_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35074_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35074_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35086_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35086_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35111_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35111_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35121_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35121_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35128_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35128_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35147_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35147_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35181_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35181_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35231_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35231_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35264_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35264_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35306_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 35306_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35319_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35319_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35322_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35322_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35374_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35374_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35376_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35376_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35426_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35426_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35571_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35571_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35603_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35603_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35655_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35655_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35673_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35673_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35678_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35678_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35680_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35680_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35703_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35703_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35769_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35769_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35786_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35786_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35793_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35793_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35835_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35835_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35901_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35901_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35922_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35922_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35960_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35960_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35970_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35970_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35986_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 35986_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36019_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36019_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36043_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36043_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36057_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36057_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36063_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36063_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36067_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36067_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36111_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36111_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36124_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36124_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36126_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36126_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36128_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36128_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36178_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36178_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36216_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36216_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36242_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36242_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36266_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36266_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36274_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36274_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36278_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36278_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36332_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36332_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36354_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36354_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36380_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36380_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36394_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36394_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36406_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36406_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36426_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36426_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36431_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36431_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36455_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36455_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36516_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36516_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36524_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36524_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36541_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36541_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36563_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36563_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36593_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36593_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36649_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36649_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36693_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36693_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36703_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36703_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36735_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36735_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36794_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36794_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36819_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36819_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36868_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36868_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36916_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36916_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36924_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36924_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36950_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36950_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36965_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36965_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36977_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36977_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36979_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36979_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36980_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 36980_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37005_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 37005_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37036_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 37036_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37037_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 37037_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37055_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 37055_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37123_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 37123_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37132_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 37132_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37153_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 37153_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37160_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 37160_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37168_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 37168_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37188_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 37188_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37250_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 37250_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37268_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 37268_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37273_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 37273_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37281_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 37281_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37328_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 37328_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37384_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 37384_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37411_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 37411_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37421_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 37421_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37422_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 37422_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37462_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 37462_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37483_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 37483_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37541_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 37541_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37551_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 37551_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37648_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 37648_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24075_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 24075_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16840_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 16840_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22202_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 22202_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07989_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 07989_fd_Psc-08-Q2b1x1_2026-10-19_00-26-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
