This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 19.2010* 05 21 07.64 +23 38 19.8 10.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1452 Tau,2461332.7010,10.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1452 Tau 20261019.2010 10.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.2010 2461332.7010 10.92 05:21:58.69 +23:06:08.1
182.04613 -7.61821 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis 1 1 1 11.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:21:58.69 +23:06:08.1: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:21:58.69 +23:06:08.1: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 19.2010* 05 21 58.69 +23 06 08.1 10.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.7010,10.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.2010 10.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 19.2010* 05 21 07.66 +23 38 19.5 10.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1452 Tau,2461332.7010,10.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1452 Tau 20261019.2010 10.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.2010 2461332.7010 12.84 05:18:43.49 +20:33:04.7
183.76218 -9.66742 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula -0 0 0 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:18:43.49 +20:33:04.7: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:18:43.49 +20:33:04.7: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 19.2010* 05 18 43.49 +20 33 04.7 12.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.7010,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.2010 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.2010 2461332.7010 13.34 05:45:59.18 +19:20:01.4
188.26158 -4.91200 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.168 Sibylla 0 -0 1 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:59.18 +19:20:01.4: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:59.18 +19:20:01.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 19.2010* 05 45 59.18 +19 20 01.4 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.7010,13.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.2010 13.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461332.70127440 19.10.2026 04:49:40.108 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18304
Objects passed selection criteria: 18194
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12337.2
Average stars matched: 11795 (95.6048 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 243548 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 19 00:22:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461332.70127440 19.10.2026 04:49:40.108 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 85
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 36 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 139969
Objects passed selection criteria: 139565
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 98009
Average stars matched: 91900.8 (93.7677 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 538292 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 19 00:24:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461332.70076541
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Image size: 940.9'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:18.293 +21:59:56.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:18.293 +21:59:56.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0049 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Image size: 940.7'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:15.738 +22:00:21.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:15.738 +22:00:21.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0162 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:18.293 +21:59:56.94
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:15.738 +22:00:21.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01204 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0ttj8BDsVO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7kBGN4F99V
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eVWDb5iZIr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5d4smqPyIK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.0ttj8BDsVO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=3694, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 17090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4775 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4774 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4705 stars left (next iteration limit 5175)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4705 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=1788 n_q2=376 n_q3=1844 n_q4=697 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4705 N_valid=4705 bias_ra_arcsec=0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.009 median_sep_arcsec=0.265 p95_sep_arcsec=1.655 n_q1=1788 n_q2=376 n_q3=1844 n_q4=697 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.7kBGN4F99V (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=3377, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 15475 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4776 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4777 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4708 stars left (next iteration limit 5177)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4708 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=1784 n_q2=371 n_q3=1863 n_q4=690 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4708 N_valid=4708 bias_ra_arcsec=0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.010 median_sep_arcsec=0.365 p95_sep_arcsec=1.905 n_q1=1784 n_q2=371 n_q3=1863 n_q4=690 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.eVWDb5iZIr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=11, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=509, bad_region=2271, passed=8644
Got 8644 stars (including 5973 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8644 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4803 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4802 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4722 stars left (next iteration limit 5199)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=7.210 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.252 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.252 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=0.754 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.955 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.955 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=0.565 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.776 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.776 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4722 robust_rms_before=1.606 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.543 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.565 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.781 worst_region_rms_after=0.776 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.345 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.776
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.781 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.781 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.543 arcsec matched=4722
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=4722 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.617 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.544 n_q1=1301 n_q2=1125 n_q3=1083 n_q4=1213 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4722 N_valid=4722 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.417 bias_dec_arcsec=0.672 median_sep_arcsec=1.410 p95_sep_arcsec=3.864 n_q1=1301 n_q2=1125 n_q3=1083 n_q4=1213 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5d4smqPyIK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=500, bad_region=2308, passed=8744
Got 8744 stars (including 6033 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8744 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4799 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4799 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4725 stars left (next iteration limit 5197)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4725 robust_rms=7.245 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.289 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.289 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4725 robust_rms=0.765 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.993 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.993 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4725 robust_rms=0.571 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.771 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.771 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4725 robust_rms_before=1.529 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.552 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.571 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.810 worst_region_rms_after=0.771 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.399 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.771
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.810 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.810 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.552 arcsec matched=4725
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=4725 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.631 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.519 n_q1=1312 n_q2=1122 n_q3=1076 n_q4=1215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.158
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4725 N_valid=4725 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.370 bias_dec_arcsec=0.748 median_sep_arcsec=1.352 p95_sep_arcsec=3.627 n_q1=1312 n_q2=1122 n_q3=1076 n_q4=1215 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.193
ref2=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.515 worst_q_ratio=1.175
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits sigma_overall=0.536 worst_q_ratio=1.152
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits sigma_overall=0.544 worst_q_ratio=1.158
reference average sigma_overall=0.4505 worst_q_ratio=1.184
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4705 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4708 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256_astrometric_residuals.png (4722 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257_astrometric_residuals.png (4725 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:21:58.69 +23:06:08.1: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:21:58.69 +23:06:08.1: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31264.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31085_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 31085_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31264_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 31264_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.37 +17:54:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03444_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 03444_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.76 +25:25:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 14s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:21:58.69 +23:06:08.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Image size: 940.9'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:18.293 +21:59:56.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:18.293 +21:59:56.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0049 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Image size: 940.7'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:15.738 +22:00:21.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:15.738 +22:00:21.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0162 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:18.293 +21:59:56.94
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:15.738 +22:00:21.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01204 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4jFRdZU0Mh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yKDbp4O4UG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QGwaOKocGH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rmpfm0E4GA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.76
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.76
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 78 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4jFRdZU0Mh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=23036, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 124901 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4762 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4763 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5185)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1719 n_q2=436 n_q3=1839 n_q4=719 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4713 N_valid=4713 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.006 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.255 p95_sep_arcsec=1.454 n_q1=1719 n_q2=436 n_q3=1839 n_q4=719 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.yKDbp4O4UG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=20219, bad_region=22244, passed=162977
Got 162977 stars (including 121992 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4704 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4704 stars left (next iteration limit 5176)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4704 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.412 n_q1=1720 n_q2=418 n_q3=1843 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4704 N_valid=4704 bias_ra_arcsec=0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.347 p95_sep_arcsec=1.639 n_q1=1720 n_q2=418 n_q3=1843 n_q4=723 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QGwaOKocGH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3552, bad_region=12034, passed=66067
Got 66067 stars (including 51117 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66067 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57273 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4780 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57273 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57273 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4715 stars left (next iteration limit 5189)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4715 robust_rms=7.250 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.867 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.867 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4715 robust_rms=0.754 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.960 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.960 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4715 robust_rms=0.559 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.819 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.819 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4715 robust_rms_before=1.605 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.535 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.559 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.787 worst_region_rms_after=0.819 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.319 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.819
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.787 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.787 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.535 arcsec matched=4715
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=4715 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.528 n_q1=1343 n_q2=1080 n_q3=1087 n_q4=1205 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4715 N_valid=4715 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.416 bias_dec_arcsec=0.676 median_sep_arcsec=1.407 p95_sep_arcsec=3.617 n_q1=1343 n_q2=1080 n_q3=1087 n_q4=1205 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.rmpfm0E4GA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=3655, bad_region=12369, passed=66976
Got 66976 stars (including 51611 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66976 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4776 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4709 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4709 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4709 stars left (next iteration limit 5182)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4709 robust_rms=7.242 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.179 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.179 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4709 robust_rms=0.769 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.050 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.050 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4709 robust_rms=0.576 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.827 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.827 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4709 robust_rms_before=1.536 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.549 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.576 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.806 worst_region_rms_after=0.827 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.376 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.827
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.806 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.806 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.549 arcsec matched=4709
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=4709 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.500 n_q1=1331 n_q2=1086 n_q3=1081 n_q4=1211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4709 N_valid=4709 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.374 bias_dec_arcsec=0.749 median_sep_arcsec=1.360 p95_sep_arcsec=3.339 n_q1=1331 n_q2=1086 n_q3=1081 n_q4=1211 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-48-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_002008_TTUQ2b1x1_59537_jTBkIPPj/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:32:24.10 +20:11:59.1: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:22:55.17 +23:19:50.8: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:23:54.00 +21:16:57.3: 14.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:07.15 +19:55:46.8: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:43:57.43 +23:09:40.7: 11.29 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:07.15 +19:55:46.8: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:32:24.10 +20:11:59.1: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:23:54.00 +21:16:57.3: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:22:55.17 +23:19:50.8: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:07.15 +19:55:46.8: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2902 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:24.10 +20:11:59.1: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3739 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:54.00 +21:16:57.3: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9668 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:22:55.17 +23:19:50.8: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5115 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:43:57.43 +23:09:40.7: 11.29 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.29 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:43:57.43 +23:09:40.7: ref_mag=11.29 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4459 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:18:43.49 +20:33:04.7: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:18:43.49 +20:33:04.7: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.68 +25:20:28.9: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:40.08 +22:58:28.9: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.68 +25:20:28.9: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.68 +25:20:28.9: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3228 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:44:03.68 +25:21:38.5: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:59.18 +19:20:01.4: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:40.08 +22:58:28.9: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:40.08 +22:58:28.9: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3333 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:44:03.68 +25:21:38.5: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:59.18 +19:20:01.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:03.68 +25:21:38.5: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4446 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:13:27.25 +21:40:31.1: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:13:27.25 +21:40:31.1: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:27.25 +21:40:31.1: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9270 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:13:05.04 +20:18:42.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:13:05.04 +20:18:42.3: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:05.04 +20:18:42.3: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2956 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193464.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out197755.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189034_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 189034_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189043_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 189043_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:56.25 +23:05:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189049_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 189049_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189053_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 189053_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189054_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 189054_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:27.52 +25:26:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189064_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 189064_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189066_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 189066_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:56.56 +25:28:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189069_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 189069_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:26.49 +25:17:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189074_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 189074_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.16 +18:20:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189077_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 189077_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:58.07 +22:41:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189078_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 189078_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:11.92 +18:29:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189085_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 189085_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189086_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 189086_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:16.92 +20:08:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189579_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 189579_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189739_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 189739_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:58.68 +23:06:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192041_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 192041_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.71 +22:27:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192223_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 192223_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.12 +22:38:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192650_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 192650_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:09.99 +18:33:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192728_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 192728_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:00.64 +20:46:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192752_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 192752_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.68 +19:34:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192998_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 192998_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.99 +25:05:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193162_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 193162_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:40.07 +18:13:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193198_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 193198_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:54.80 +23:41:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193443_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 193443_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.97 +20:10:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193464_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 193464_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193742_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 193742_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:54.25 +26:06:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193868_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 193868_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.26 +18:59:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193905_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 193905_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:34.25 +17:39:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194041_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 194041_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.73 +22:40:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194352_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 194352_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:02.34 +24:18:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194464_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 194464_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.35 +18:33:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194595_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 194595_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:03.04 +18:33:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194677_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 194677_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.26 +23:00:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194922_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 194922_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:36.48 +22:27:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194927_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 194927_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.62 +20:02:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194974_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 194974_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.55 +21:46:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195616_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 195616_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.80 +19:32:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195695_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 195695_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.71 +20:05:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195737_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 195737_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:57.03 +19:12:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195747_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 195747_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:37.47 +22:22:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195819_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 195819_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:14.93 +19:35:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195898_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 195898_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:59.72 +22:34:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196004_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 196004_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:02.23 +22:57:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196032_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 196032_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.15 +20:53:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196185_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 196185_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196396_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 196396_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:24.55 +22:16:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196422_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 196422_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:20.26 +25:09:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196497_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 196497_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:37.12 +25:25:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196535_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 196535_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:29.16 +18:44:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196720_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 196720_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.41 +20:56:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196726_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 196726_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.68 +25:22:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196850_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 196850_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.78 +23:11:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196937_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 196937_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.30 +23:07:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196995_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 196995_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:46.84 +22:42:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197008_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 197008_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197075_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 197075_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:20.15 +24:24:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197146_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 197146_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197649_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 197649_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:06.18 +24:25:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197755_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 197755_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197944_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 197944_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:04.54 +20:26:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198167_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 198167_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:45.72 +21:24:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198251_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 198251_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:30.10 +21:58:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198262_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 198262_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:19.02 +21:33:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198395_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 198395_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:52.44 +23:20:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198455_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 198455_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:34.76 +17:59:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198712_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 198712_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:15.52 +18:46:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198729_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 198729_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:50.17 +25:14:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198828_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 198828_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199512_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 199512_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:58.93 +21:26:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200775_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 200775_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:33.63 +21:19:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184049_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 184049_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:48.89 +22:22:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:36.65 +23:10:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.40 +26:13:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180001_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 180001_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.07 +24:09:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:30.61 +22:47:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.39 +17:54:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-49-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
