This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.1889 2461332.6889 11.75 23:06:38.22 -19:55:25.3
44.02270 -64.97689 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.23 Thalia -0 -0 0 12.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:06:38.22 -19:55:25.3: 15.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:06:38.22 -19:55:25.3: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.6889,11.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.1889 11.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.1889 2461332.6889 12.26 23:18:17.41 -14:09:03.1
59.12243 -64.71002 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 1.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.118 Peitho -1 -1 1 12.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:18:17.41 -14:09:03.1: 14.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:18:17.41 -14:09:03.1: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.6889,12.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.1889 12.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.1889 2461332.6889 13.02 23:20:03.50 -20:02:05.1
46.77577 -67.93514 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.259 Aletheia 0 -0 0 12.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:20:03.50 -20:02:05.1: 14.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:20:03.50 -20:02:05.1: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.6889,13.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.1889 13.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.1889 2461332.6889 13.40 23:10:52.92 -15:36:47.2
54.05090 -63.98547 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.530 Turandot -0 -0 0 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:10:52.92 -15:36:47.2: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:10:52.92 -15:36:47.2: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.6889,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.1889 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.1889 2461332.6889 13.81 22:49:05.73 -13:51:33.9
51.70604 -58.54878 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.442 Eichsfeldia -0 0 1 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 22:49:05.73 -13:51:33.9: 15.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 22:49:05.73 -13:51:33.9: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.6889,13.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.1889 13.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461212.88469579 21.06.2026 09:13:47.716 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
First image: 2461212.88469579 21.06.2026 09:13:47.716 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
Last image: 2461332.68912890 19.10.2026 04:32:10.737 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.94
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 3485
Objects passed selection criteria: 3470
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 2678.75
Average stars matched: 2358.5 (88.0448 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 230112 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 19 00:04:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461212.88469579 21.06.2026 09:13:47.716 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
First image: 2461212.88469579 21.06.2026 09:13:47.716 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
Last image: 2461332.68912890 19.10.2026 04:32:10.737 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 142
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 21638
Objects passed selection criteria: 21570
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 17261.8
Average stars matched: 15102 (87.4882 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 244468 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 19 00:05:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461332.68868662
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:06:40.465 -17:59:46.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:06:41.496 -17:59:47.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:06:40.465 -17:59:46.14
Second-epoch image center 23:06:41.496 -17:59:47.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0041 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:06:40.861 -17:59:45.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:06:40.465 -17:59:46.14
Second-epoch image center 23:06:40.861 -17:59:45.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0016 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:06:41.496 -17:59:47.57
Second-epoch second image center 23:06:40.861 -17:59:45.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00257 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g86n3SUzoU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OvI2ygv1L9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JPLeewZ53R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QzvNJ8YIR8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits and wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits and wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits and wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 3335 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.2681 to 355.1405 deg, Dec -23.2523 to -12.5761 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.2681 to 355.1405 deg, Dec -23.2523 to -12.5761 deg
Loaded 4546 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2669 out of 2711 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2711 out of 3335 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.435500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.435500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.94
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 3335 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.2681 to 355.1405 deg, Dec -23.2523 to -12.5761 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.2681 to 355.1405 deg, Dec -23.2523 to -12.5761 deg
Loaded 4546 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2669 out of 2711 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2711 out of 3335 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 2735 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.2677 to 355.1377 deg, Dec -23.2523 to -12.5973 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.2677 to 355.1377 deg, Dec -23.2523 to -12.5973 deg
Loaded 4533 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2231 out of 2254 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2254 out of 2735 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
2.2 pix Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
14.3 mag. Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.g86n3SUzoU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=238, bad_region=696, passed=3335
Got 3335 stars (including 2446 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3335 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2317 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2317 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2311 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2311 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 2311 stars left (next iteration limit 2543)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits N_match=2311 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.350 n_q1=783 n_q2=386 n_q3=710 n_q4=432 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.064
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2311 N_valid=2311 bias_ra_arcsec=0.018 bias_dec_arcsec=0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.317 p95_sep_arcsec=0.835 n_q1=783 n_q2=386 n_q3=710 n_q4=432 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits -region wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OvI2ygv1L9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=193, bad_region=579, passed=2735
Got 2735 stars (including 2002 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2735 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 1900 stars left (next iteration limit 2090)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits N_match=1900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.344 n_q1=625 n_q2=315 n_q3=613 n_q4=347 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=1900 N_valid=1900 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.010 bias_dec_arcsec=0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.307 p95_sep_arcsec=0.943 n_q1=625 n_q2=315 n_q3=613 n_q4=347 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits -region wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JPLeewZ53R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=292, bad_region=1015, passed=4012
Got 4012 stars (including 2769 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4012 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2657 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2653 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2653 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2653 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2657 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2653 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2653 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 2653 stars left (next iteration limit 2918)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2653 robust_rms=7.543 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.344 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.344 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2653 robust_rms=0.522 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.117 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.117 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2653 robust_rms=0.310 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.434 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.434 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2653 robust_rms_before=1.056 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.311 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.310 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.395 worst_region_rms_after=0.434 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.660 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.434
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.395 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.395 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.311 arcsec matched=2653
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits N_match=2653 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=875 n_q2=502 n_q3=780 n_q4=496 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.062
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2653 N_valid=2653 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.613 bias_dec_arcsec=0.576 median_sep_arcsec=1.010 p95_sep_arcsec=1.987 n_q1=875 n_q2=502 n_q3=780 n_q4=496 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QzvNJ8YIR8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=322, bad_region=1005, passed=3993
Got 3993 stars (including 2735 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3993 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2626 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2622 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2622 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2626 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2622 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2622 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 2622 stars left (next iteration limit 2884)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2622 robust_rms=7.348 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.782 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.782 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2622 robust_rms=0.569 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.830 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.830 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2622 robust_rms=0.338 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.414 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.414 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2622 robust_rms_before=1.071 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.339 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.338 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.378 worst_region_rms_after=0.414 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.679 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.414
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.378 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.378 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.339 arcsec matched=2622
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits N_match=2622 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=859 n_q2=497 n_q3=781 n_q4=485 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.110
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2622 N_valid=2622 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.624 bias_dec_arcsec=0.584 median_sep_arcsec=1.012 p95_sep_arcsec=1.951 n_q1=859 n_q2=497 n_q3=781 n_q4=485 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.064
ref2=Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.217
new1=fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits sigma_overall=0.319 worst_q_ratio=1.062
new2=fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits sigma_overall=0.350 worst_q_ratio=1.110
reference average sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.1405
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406_astrometric_residuals.png (2311 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410_astrometric_residuals.png (1900 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240_astrometric_residuals.png (2653 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241_astrometric_residuals.png (2622 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 22:58:13.83 -17:42:21.0: 11.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:03:13.54 -17:24:03.6: 11.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:01:14.29 -19:09:54.8: 11.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:05:17.09 -16:51:39.4: 11.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 22:58:13.83 -17:42:21.0: 11.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:05:17.09 -16:51:39.4: 11.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:03:13.54 -17:24:03.6: 11.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:01:14.29 -19:09:54.8: 11.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:03:13.54 -17:24:03.6: ref_mag=11.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2518 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:05:17.09 -16:51:39.4: ref_mag=11.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1862 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:14.29 -19:09:54.8: ref_mag=11.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3166 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:58:13.83 -17:42:21.0: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2044 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20369_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 20369_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:04:00.61 -20:54:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20417_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 20417_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20426_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 20426_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20446_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 20446_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20482_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 20482_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00931_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 00931_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:57:06.58 -20:20:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aqr-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:06:40.465 -17:59:46.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:06:41.496 -17:59:47.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:06:40.465 -17:59:46.14
Second-epoch image center 23:06:41.496 -17:59:47.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0041 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:06:40.861 -17:59:45.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:06:40.465 -17:59:46.14
Second-epoch image center 23:06:40.861 -17:59:45.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0016 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:06:41.496 -17:59:47.57
Second-epoch second image center 23:06:40.861 -17:59:45.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00257 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits &> /tmp/tmp.733FKaqef1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tmvdMtkkFh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oh7UmoQDSL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jDwyVdcdRA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits and wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits and wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits and wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 19454 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.2356 to 355.1719 deg, Dec -23.2559 to -12.5761 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.2356 to 355.1719 deg, Dec -23.2559 to -12.5761 deg
Loaded 4568 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3693 out of 3823 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3823 out of 19454 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.293600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.293600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.67
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.67
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 19454 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.2356 to 355.1719 deg, Dec -23.2559 to -12.5761 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.2356 to 355.1719 deg, Dec -23.2559 to -12.5761 deg
Loaded 4568 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3693 out of 3823 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3823 out of 19454 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 17815 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.2344 to 355.1739 deg, Dec -23.2554 to -12.5760 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.2344 to 355.1739 deg, Dec -23.2554 to -12.5760 deg
Loaded 4568 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3728 out of 3836 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3836 out of 17815 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 69 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
2.1 pix Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
14.5 mag. Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.733FKaqef1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=650, bad_region=2800, passed=19446
Got 19446 stars (including 16167 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19446 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4784 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17350 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4784 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17350 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17350 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4778 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits N_match=4778 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.362 n_q1=1568 n_q2=774 n_q3=1522 n_q4=914 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.034
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4778 N_valid=4778 bias_ra_arcsec=0.015 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.343 p95_sep_arcsec=0.879 n_q1=1568 n_q2=774 n_q3=1522 n_q4=914 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits -region wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.tmvdMtkkFh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=542, bad_region=2798, passed=17807
Got 17807 stars (including 14549 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17807 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15700 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15700 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15700 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4782 stars left (next iteration limit 5260)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits N_match=4782 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.368 n_q1=1572 n_q2=818 n_q3=1474 n_q4=918 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4782 N_valid=4782 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.006 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.342 p95_sep_arcsec=0.955 n_q1=1572 n_q2=818 n_q3=1474 n_q4=918 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits -region wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.oh7UmoQDSL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=742, bad_region=4815, passed=23558
Got 23558 stars (including 18161 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23558 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4814 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4814 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4813 stars left (next iteration limit 5295)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=7.377 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.743 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.743 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=0.527 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.269 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.269 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=0.337 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.453 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.453 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4813 robust_rms_before=1.056 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.327 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.337 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.429 worst_region_rms_after=0.453 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.686 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.453
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.429 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.429 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.327 arcsec matched=4813
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits N_match=4813 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=1507 n_q2=936 n_q3=1452 n_q4=918 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.026
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4813 N_valid=4813 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.608 bias_dec_arcsec=0.583 median_sep_arcsec=1.004 p95_sep_arcsec=1.853 n_q1=1507 n_q2=936 n_q3=1452 n_q4=918 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jDwyVdcdRA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=787, bad_region=4895, passed=24042
Got 24042 stars (including 18521 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24042 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4813 stars left (next iteration limit 5294)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=7.231 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.514 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.514 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=0.564 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.058 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.058 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=0.365 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.444 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.444 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4813 robust_rms_before=1.076 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.358 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.365 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.399 worst_region_rms_after=0.444 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.670 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.444
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.399 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.399 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.358 arcsec matched=4813
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits N_match=4813 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=1511 n_q2=937 n_q3=1448 n_q4=917 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.017
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4813 N_valid=4813 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.626 bias_dec_arcsec=0.587 median_sep_arcsec=1.005 p95_sep_arcsec=1.864 n_q1=1511 n_q2=937 n_q3=1448 n_q4=917 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-31-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0240.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-19_CI_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_000210_TTUQ2b1x1_3832813_5VDTz529/wcs_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:22:39.35 -20:52:24.5: 14.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:06:38.22 -19:55:25.3: 15.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:18:17.41 -14:09:03.1: 14.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:20:03.50 -20:02:05.1: 14.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:18:17.41 -14:09:03.1: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:06:38.22 -19:55:25.3: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:22:39.35 -20:52:24.5: 13.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:22:39.35 -20:52:24.5: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7243 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:10:52.92 -15:36:47.2: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:20:03.50 -20:02:05.1: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:23:26.24 -21:30:30.9: 13.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:09:06.50 -21:59:55.6: 14.50 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:22:44.56 -20:49:22.8: 14.13 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:24:18.10 -22:08:59.0: 14.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:21:41.18 -21:01:10.3: 14.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:25:40.45 -21:12:48.0: 13.91 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:10:52.92 -15:36:47.2: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:23:26.24 -21:30:30.9: 13.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:23:26.24 -21:30:30.9: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7414 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:09:06.50 -21:59:55.6: 13.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:09:06.50 -21:59:55.6: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7786 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:22:44.56 -20:49:22.8: 13.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:25:40.45 -21:12:48.0: 14.04 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:22:44.56 -20:49:22.8: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8534 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:21:41.18 -21:01:10.3: 13.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:24:18.10 -22:08:59.0: 14.13 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:40.45 -21:12:48.0: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8154 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:18.10 -22:08:59.0: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8929 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:41.18 -21:01:10.3: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8833 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:22:53.29 -21:39:55.3: 14.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:16:37.99 -22:01:59.2: 13.98 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:20:05.21 -21:40:16.7: 13.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:20:18.94 -22:00:28.6: 14.17 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:20:23.03 -21:30:08.1: 13.95 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:25:52.01 -21:49:26.8: 13.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:22:53.29 -21:39:55.3: 14.12 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:22:53.29 -21:39:55.3: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.9206 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:16:37.99 -22:01:59.2: 14.36 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:16:37.99 -22:01:59.2: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.9578 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:20:18.94 -22:00:28.6: 14.17 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:20:23.03 -21:30:08.1: 13.91 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:20:05.21 -21:40:16.7: 13.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:25:52.01 -21:49:26.8: 13.93 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:20:23.03 -21:30:08.1: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8686 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:20:18.94 -22:00:28.6: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.9904 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:20:05.21 -21:40:16.7: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8805 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:52.01 -21:49:26.8: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8922 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:21:52.39 -21:42:40.4: 13.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:22:36.69 -21:19:37.3: 14.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:25:54.67 -21:47:13.2: 14.04 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:25:14.30 -21:31:56.8: 13.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:19:38.04 -22:10:22.3: 13.99 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:20:12.99 -22:13:13.8: 13.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:21:52.39 -21:42:40.4: 13.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:52.39 -21:42:40.4: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9528 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:25:14.30 -21:31:56.8: 13.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:25:54.67 -21:47:13.2: 13.98 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:22:36.69 -21:19:37.3: 13.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:19:38.04 -22:10:22.3: 13.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:14.30 -21:31:56.8: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0062 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:54.67 -21:47:13.2: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.9161 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:22:36.69 -21:19:37.3: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0169 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:19:38.04 -22:10:22.3: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.9956 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:20:12.99 -22:13:13.8: 13.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:20:12.99 -22:13:13.8: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0584 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:10:35.62 -15:11:38.2: 14.10 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 22:49:05.73 -13:51:33.9: 15.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_04-13-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits at 23:24:25.45 -15:33:56.4: 13.86 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 22:49:05.73 -13:51:33.9: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:10:35.62 -15:11:38.2: 14.04 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-35-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0410.fits at 23:24:25.45 -15:33:56.4: 14.37 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:10:35.62 -15:11:38.2: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0106 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:25.45 -15:33:56.4: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9440 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21388.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21769.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22407.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23005.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23982.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20738_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 20738_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21036_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 21036_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21106_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 21106_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21124_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 21124_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21137_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 21137_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:04:00.62 -20:54:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21388_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
Preparing report for the candidate 21388_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21694_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 21694_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21769_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
Preparing report for the candidate 21769_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21775_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 21775_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21826_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 21826_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21980_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 21980_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22009_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 22009_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22040_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 22040_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22222_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 22222_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22245_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 22245_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22282_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 22282_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22393_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 22393_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22407_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
Preparing report for the candidate 22407_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22425_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 22425_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22465_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 22465_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22486_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 22486_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22561_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 22561_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22625_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 22625_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22632_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 22632_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22639_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 22639_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22647_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 22647_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22754_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 22754_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22762_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 22762_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22811_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 22811_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22858_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 22858_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22935_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 22935_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22943_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 22943_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22996_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 22996_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23005_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
Preparing report for the candidate 23005_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23018_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23018_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23079_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23079_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23184_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23184_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23191_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23191_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23330_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23330_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23340_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23340_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23411_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23411_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23466_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23466_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23479_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23479_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23494_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23494_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23498_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23498_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23514_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23514_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23528_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23528_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23551_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23551_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23567_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23567_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23584_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23584_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23610_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23610_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23650_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23650_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23670_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23670_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23673_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23673_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23707_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23707_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23709_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23709_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23746_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23746_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23749_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23749_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23756_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23756_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23786_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23786_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23792_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23792_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23815_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23815_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23825_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23825_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23842_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23842_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23903_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23903_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23982_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
Preparing report for the candidate 23982_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23985_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 23985_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24006_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 24006_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04362_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 04362_fd_Aqr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_23-32-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
