This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.1572 2461332.6572 12.56 20:54:08.06 -09:25:19.2
38.57167 -31.50364 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.389 Industria -0 -0 0 13.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:54:08.06 -09:25:19.2: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:54:08.06 -09:25:19.2: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.6572,12.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.1572 12.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.1572 2461332.6572 13.74 20:48:53.71 -13:03:13.8
34.06555 -31.87914 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.38 Leda -0 -0 0 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:48:53.71 -13:03:13.8: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:48:53.71 -13:03:13.8: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.6572,13.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.1572 13.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 19.1572 2461332.6572 13.93 20:39:14.15 -12:50:15.0
33.17880 -29.64194 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.490 Veritas 0 1 1 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:39:14.15 -12:50:15.0: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:39:14.15 -12:50:15.0: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461332.6572,13.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261019.1572 13.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last image: 2461332.65746081 19.10.2026 03:46:34.614 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10385
Objects passed selection criteria: 10356
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8094.5
Average stars matched: 7876.75 (97.3099 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 237296 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Oct 18 23:20:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last image: 2461332.65746081 19.10.2026 03:46:34.614 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 87
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 68279
Objects passed selection criteria: 68174
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 59660.2
Average stars matched: 57713 (96.7361 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 562536 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Oct 18 23:21:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461332.65694515
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:19.165 -09:59:22.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:19.165 -09:59:22.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0178 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.269 -09:58:44.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:16.269 -09:58:44.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0028 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:19.165 -09:59:22.60
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:16.269 -09:58:44.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01585 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HQ9NmRhDL3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lI8x3rgL3F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fwMSHbKP1j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3yhFKgkvvz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.734000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.734000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7839 out of 8130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8130 out of 14495 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.6 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
15.2 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.HQ9NmRhDL3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=755, bad_region=3560, passed=14476
Got 14476 stars (including 10329 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.235 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1501 n_q2=996 n_q3=1414 n_q4=964 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4875 N_valid=4875 bias_ra_arcsec=0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=0.009 median_sep_arcsec=0.211 p95_sep_arcsec=0.821 n_q1=1501 n_q2=996 n_q3=1414 n_q4=964 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lI8x3rgL3F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=763, bad_region=3538, passed=14495
Got 14495 stars (including 10373 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1511 n_q2=992 n_q3=1419 n_q4=958 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4880 N_valid=4880 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.217 p95_sep_arcsec=0.811 n_q1=1511 n_q2=992 n_q3=1419 n_q4=958 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fwMSHbKP1j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=498, bad_region=1792, passed=7143
Got 7143 stars (including 4947 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7143 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4823 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5728 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5728 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4825 stars left (next iteration limit 5305)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4825 robust_rms=7.802 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.500 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.500 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4825 robust_rms=0.523 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.129 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.129 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4825 robust_rms=0.357 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.496 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.496 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4825 robust_rms_before=0.853 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.353 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.357 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.480 worst_region_rms_after=0.496 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.097 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.496
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.480 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.480 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.353 arcsec matched=4825
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits N_match=4825 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.414 n_q1=1498 n_q2=1043 n_q3=1351 n_q4=933 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4825 N_valid=4825 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.345 bias_dec_arcsec=0.418 median_sep_arcsec=0.761 p95_sep_arcsec=1.758 n_q1=1498 n_q2=1043 n_q3=1351 n_q4=933 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.3yhFKgkvvz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=516, bad_region=1774, passed=7135
Got 7135 stars (including 4934 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7135 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4814 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4814 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5728 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5728 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4816 stars left (next iteration limit 5295)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4816 robust_rms=7.764 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.980 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.980 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4816 robust_rms=0.499 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.081 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.081 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4816 robust_rms=0.345 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.477 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.477 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4816 robust_rms_before=0.838 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.343 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.345 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.479 worst_region_rms_after=0.477 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.104 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.477
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.479 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.479 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.343 arcsec matched=4816
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits N_match=4816 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.388 n_q1=1482 n_q2=1034 n_q3=1367 n_q4=933 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4816 N_valid=4816 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.392 bias_dec_arcsec=0.403 median_sep_arcsec=0.760 p95_sep_arcsec=1.745 n_q1=1482 n_q2=1034 n_q3=1367 n_q4=933 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits sigma_overall=0.266 worst_q_ratio=1.163
ref2=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits sigma_overall=0.277 worst_q_ratio=1.139
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.109
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits sigma_overall=0.354 worst_q_ratio=1.094
reference average sigma_overall=0.2715 worst_q_ratio=1.151
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235_astrometric_residuals.png (4880 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192_astrometric_residuals.png (4825 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193_astrometric_residuals.png (4816 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:47.89 -07:47:32.2: 10.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:47.89 -07:47:32.2: 10.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.21 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:47.89 -07:47:32.2: ref_mag=10.21 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4071 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20675_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 20675_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20695_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 20695_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:36.73 -12:31:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:13.33 -07:21:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:19.165 -09:59:22.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:19.165 -09:59:22.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0178 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.269 -09:58:44.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:16.269 -09:58:44.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0028 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:19.165 -09:59:22.60
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:16.269 -09:58:44.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01585 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bCZdaPYaHE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vPGWyb6gmI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3FDA3arjhK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BZIraZilOM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 95426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Loaded 10309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7294 out of 8388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8388 out of 95426 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.637550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.637550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 95426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Loaded 10309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7294 out of 8388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8388 out of 95426 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 95800 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1479 to 316.7695 deg, Dec -15.5883 to -4.1862 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1479 to 316.7695 deg, Dec -15.5883 to -4.1862 deg
Loaded 10308 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7289 out of 8389 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8389 out of 95800 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 67 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
15.4 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.bCZdaPYaHE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=6181, bad_region=22296, passed=95415
Got 95415 stars (including 68383 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.227 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=1535 n_q2=964 n_q3=1443 n_q4=936 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4878 N_valid=4878 bias_ra_arcsec=0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=0.019 median_sep_arcsec=0.212 p95_sep_arcsec=0.813 n_q1=1535 n_q2=964 n_q3=1443 n_q4=936 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vPGWyb6gmI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=6280, bad_region=22525, passed=95786
Got 95786 stars (including 68372 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95786 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.227 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.263 n_q1=1544 n_q2=948 n_q3=1446 n_q4=947 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4885 N_valid=4885 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=0.013 median_sep_arcsec=0.215 p95_sep_arcsec=0.786 n_q1=1544 n_q2=948 n_q3=1446 n_q4=947 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.3FDA3arjhK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2638, bad_region=10667, passed=57636
Got 57636 stars (including 44892 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57636 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=7.602 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.946 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.946 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.516 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.194 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.194 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.354 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.502 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.502 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4875 robust_rms_before=0.848 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.347 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.354 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.464 worst_region_rms_after=0.502 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.071 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.502
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.464 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.464 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.347 arcsec matched=4875
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=1478 n_q2=1044 n_q3=1401 n_q4=952 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.074
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4875 N_valid=4875 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.358 bias_dec_arcsec=0.423 median_sep_arcsec=0.753 p95_sep_arcsec=1.703 n_q1=1478 n_q2=1044 n_q3=1401 n_q4=952 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.BZIraZilOM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2612, bad_region=10591, passed=57309
Got 57309 stars (including 44625 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57309 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49532 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49532 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49532 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=7.542 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.192 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.192 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.493 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.160 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.160 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.343 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.483 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.483 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4873 robust_rms_before=0.832 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.339 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.343 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.488 worst_region_rms_after=0.483 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.102 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.483
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.488 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.488 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.339 arcsec matched=4873
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=1475 n_q2=1035 n_q3=1412 n_q4=951 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.068
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4873 N_valid=4873 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.408 bias_dec_arcsec=0.404 median_sep_arcsec=0.752 p95_sep_arcsec=1.682 n_q1=1475 n_q2=1035 n_q3=1412 n_q4=951 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-45-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_231812_TTUQ2b1x1_2510899_p6KcQQZE/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:29:24.53 -08:14:14.7: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:30:29.61 -08:04:42.0: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:18.48 -06:27:14.8: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:36:46.63 -09:02:10.1: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:37.58 -13:38:49.3: 13.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:39:25.87 -09:33:06.0: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:24:45.66 -08:00:06.1: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:50:28.94 -11:43:32.3: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:34:53.57 -08:21:43.9: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:38:24.81 -09:59:11.3: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:39:25.87 -09:33:06.0: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:38:24.81 -09:59:11.3: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:30:29.61 -08:04:42.0: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:18.48 -06:27:14.8: 13.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:36:46.63 -09:02:10.1: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:37.58 -13:38:49.3: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:29:24.53 -08:14:14.7: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:50:28.94 -11:43:32.3: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:34:53.57 -08:21:43.9: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:24:45.66 -08:00:06.1: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:25.87 -09:33:06.0: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2494 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:29.61 -08:04:42.0: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0083 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:18.48 -06:27:14.8: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7693 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:37.58 -13:38:49.3: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8224 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:53.57 -08:21:43.9: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7649 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:46.63 -09:02:10.1: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1106 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:24.81 -09:59:11.3: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7517 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:24.53 -08:14:14.7: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2138 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:45.66 -08:00:06.1: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7731 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:28.94 -11:43:32.3: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8967 delta=-0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:48:23.37 -07:37:40.4: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:40:42.47 -11:08:26.8: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:04.60 -12:39:25.6: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:24:08.16 -07:18:04.6: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:49:31.91 -12:50:02.7: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:25:50.93 -11:16:45.7: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:17:45.83 -09:07:07.9: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:26:53.52 -12:07:53.0: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:29:06.71 -13:25:16.1: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:34:55.83 -13:34:24.2: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:40:42.47 -11:08:26.8: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:48:23.37 -07:37:40.4: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:04.60 -12:39:25.6: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:17:45.83 -09:07:07.9: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:25:50.93 -11:16:45.7: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:26:53.52 -12:07:53.0: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:24:08.16 -07:18:04.6: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:49:31.91 -12:50:02.7: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:29:06.71 -13:25:16.1: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:34:55.83 -13:34:24.2: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:42.47 -11:08:26.8: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5920 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:23.37 -07:37:40.4: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5861 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:45.83 -09:07:07.9: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5001 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:04.60 -12:39:25.6: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6104 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:50.93 -11:16:45.7: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5187 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:06.71 -13:25:16.1: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5850 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:55.83 -13:34:24.2: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8065 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:53.52 -12:07:53.0: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5295 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:08.16 -07:18:04.6: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3936 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:31.91 -12:50:02.7: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5813 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:50:25.05 -06:04:11.2: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:05.59 -08:40:17.3: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:22:28.99 -11:01:26.1: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:30:48.91 -08:16:33.0: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:27:15.72 -06:46:46.5: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:24:13.06 -12:49:26.6: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:17:00.84 -12:35:14.7: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:59:45.48 -07:16:29.0: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:35:44.51 -13:55:25.7: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:43:24.45 -06:22:29.2: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:50:25.05 -06:04:11.2: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:25.05 -06:04:11.2: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3686 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:17:00.84 -12:35:14.7: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:27:15.72 -06:46:46.5: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:43:24.45 -06:22:29.2: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:35:44.51 -13:55:25.7: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:22:28.99 -11:01:26.1: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:59:45.48 -07:16:29.0: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:30:48.91 -08:16:33.0: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:24:13.06 -12:49:26.6: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:05.59 -08:40:17.3: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:00.84 -12:35:14.7: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7204 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:15.72 -06:46:46.5: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2196 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:24.45 -06:22:29.2: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0391 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:44.51 -13:55:25.7: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7561 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:28.99 -11:01:26.1: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1148 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:48.91 -08:16:33.0: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2515 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:13.06 -12:49:26.6: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4059 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:45.48 -07:16:29.0: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8888 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:05.59 -08:40:17.3: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9671 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:27:54.33 -10:07:10.4: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:43:55.88 -07:18:06.1: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:54:08.06 -09:25:19.2: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:57:16.24 -09:15:35.6: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:36:45.28 -10:36:11.1: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:20:45.99 -07:45:59.3: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:47.88 -07:47:32.1: 10.44 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:25:44.19 -07:51:41.1: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:54:08.06 -09:25:19.2: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:27:54.33 -10:07:10.4: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:43:55.88 -07:18:06.1: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:36:45.28 -10:36:11.1: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:20:45.99 -07:45:59.3: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:47.88 -07:47:32.1: 10.39 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:57:16.24 -09:15:35.6: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:54.33 -10:07:10.4: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6277 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.41 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:55.88 -07:18:06.1: ref_mag=11.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3034 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:45.28 -10:36:11.1: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3021 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:45.99 -07:45:59.3: ref_mag=11.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8850 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:47.88 -07:47:32.1: ref_mag=10.41 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5212 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:16.24 -09:15:35.6: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4326 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:17:59.03 -10:36:17.9: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:35:28.13 -12:56:38.2: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:25:44.19 -07:51:41.1: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:44.19 -07:51:41.1: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6914 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:17:59.03 -10:36:17.9: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:35:28.13 -12:56:38.2: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:28.13 -12:56:38.2: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3427 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:59.03 -10:36:17.9: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1238 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:20:59.57 -13:53:26.5: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:25:48.75 -08:38:16.1: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:00:34.74 -11:01:16.3: 13.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:34:29.21 -05:50:58.5: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:34:05.60 -12:21:10.5: 13.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:41:39.72 -12:20:31.7: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:20:59.57 -13:53:26.5: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:59.57 -13:53:26.5: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3384 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:00:34.74 -11:01:16.3: 13.42 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:25:48.75 -08:38:16.1: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:34:29.21 -05:50:58.5: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:34.74 -11:01:16.3: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4954 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:48.75 -08:38:16.1: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5357 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:29.21 -05:50:58.5: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4401 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:27:03.19 -08:11:46.0: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:44:57.93 -11:00:51.0: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:22:24.23 -12:54:23.0: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:34:05.60 -12:21:10.5: 13.58 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:41:39.72 -12:20:31.7: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:05.60 -12:21:10.5: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6047 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:39.72 -12:20:31.7: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5056 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:27:03.19 -08:11:46.0: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:44:57.93 -11:00:51.0: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:22:24.23 -12:54:23.0: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:03.19 -08:11:46.0: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5522 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:57.93 -11:00:51.0: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5669 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:24.23 -12:54:23.0: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5570 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:48:53.71 -13:03:13.8: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:41:50.30 -10:57:28.0: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:37:28.65 -06:46:19.9: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:34:39.63 -11:51:49.3: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:22.76 -08:15:05.7: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:39:14.15 -12:50:15.0: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:48:53.71 -13:03:13.8: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:37:28.65 -06:46:19.9: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:41:50.30 -10:57:28.0: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:34:39.63 -11:51:49.3: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:28.65 -06:46:19.9: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7151 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:39.63 -11:51:49.3: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7786 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:50.30 -10:57:28.0: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6538 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:33:10.96 -10:41:34.0: 14.08 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:22.76 -08:15:05.7: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:39:14.15 -12:50:15.0: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:22.76 -08:15:05.7: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7852 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:33:10.96 -10:41:34.0: 14.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:10.96 -10:41:34.0: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2569 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112021.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112603.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112762.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111560_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111560_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111566_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111566_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111573_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111573_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111585_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111585_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111586_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111586_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111592_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111592_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111593_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111593_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111595_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111595_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111596_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111596_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111606_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111606_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111612_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111612_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111616_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111616_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111617_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111617_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111620_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111620_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111621_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111621_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111624_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111624_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111627_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111627_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111630_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111630_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111632_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111632_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111635_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111635_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111641_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111641_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111645_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111645_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111646_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111646_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111648_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111648_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111649_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111649_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111650_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111650_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111653_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111653_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111655_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111655_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111657_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111657_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111659_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111659_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111660_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111660_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111664_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111664_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111665_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111665_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111666_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111666_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111670_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111670_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111687_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111687_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:36.71 -12:31:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111860_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111860_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:40.65 -08:56:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111940_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111940_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:03.65 -12:35:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111944_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 111944_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112021_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 112021_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112053_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 112053_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112104_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 112104_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:09.58 -12:35:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112161_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 112161_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:06.10 -12:35:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112213_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 112213_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112329_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 112329_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112339_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 112339_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112341_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 112341_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112398_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 112398_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:20:26.71 -06:23:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112400_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 112400_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:53.92 -07:43:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112410_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 112410_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112430_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 112430_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112432_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 112432_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112447_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 112447_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112449_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 112449_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:40.84 -09:18:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112450_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 112450_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112452_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 112452_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112462_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 112462_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112482_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 112482_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112514_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 112514_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112558_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 112558_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112603_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 112603_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112617_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 112617_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112762_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
Preparing report for the candidate 112762_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112817_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 112817_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25145_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 25145_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:59:00.63 -07:32:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50173_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 50173_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:26:20.36 -09:32:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193
The candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_22-46-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0193 did not pass the final checks