Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 18.2110  2461331.7110  12.89  23:53:27.90 -09:20:18.5
 82.63337 -67.55364 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 9.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
217 Eudora                  -1      0       1  12.9     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:53:27.90 -09:20:18.5:  15.54 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:53:27.90 -09:20:18.5:  15.56 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits -crosshair 5786.83545 2743.98169 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits -crosshair 5780.98340 2751.48779 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 18.21104 23 53 27.90 -09 20 18.5          12.9 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 18.21068 23 53 27.90 -09 20 18.5          12.9 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 10 18.21139 23 53 27.90 -09 20 18.5          12.9 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 10 18.2110*  23 53 27.90 -09 20 18.5  12.9 U             Aqr       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461331.7110,12.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261018.2110 12.89CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 18.2110  2461331.7110  13.45  00:10:48.67 -09:20:41.1
 92.68247 -69.79380 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
906 Repsolda                -0      0       0  13.5     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:10:48.67 -09:20:41.1:  15.49 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:10:48.67 -09:20:41.1:  15.51 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits -crosshair 3199.75854 2757.60767 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits -crosshair 3193.94409 2765.18042 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 18.21104 00 10 48.67 -09 20 41.1          13.4 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 18.21068 00 10 48.66 -09 20 41.3          13.4 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 10 18.21139 00 10 48.67 -09 20 40.9          13.5 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 10 18.2110*  00 10 48.67 -09 20 41.1  13.4 U             Cet       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461331.7110,13.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261018.2110 13.45CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 18.2110  2461331.7110  14.24  23:44:12.97 -10:50:32.0
 75.55270 -67.30068 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 9.3 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
1133 Lugduna                 -1     -0       1  14.1    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:44:12.97 -10:50:32.0:  15.41 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:44:12.97 -10:50:32.0:  15.44 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits -crosshair 7161.16602 3662.50366 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits -crosshair 7155.52051 3669.85840 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 18.21104 23 44 12.97 -10 50 32.0          14.2 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 10 18.21068 23 44 13.00 -10 50 32.3          14.2 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 10 18.21139 23 44 12.94 -10 50 31.7          14.2 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 10 18.2110*  23 44 12.97 -10 50 32.0  14.2 U             Aqr       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461331.7110,14.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261018.2110 14.24CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
First image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Last  image: 2461331.71139020 18.10.2026 05:04:14.113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.67
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  4955
Objects passed selection criteria:  4937
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 3789
Average stars matched: 3288.25 (86.7841 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   231116 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sun Oct 18 00:31:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
First image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Last  image: 2461331.71139020 18.10.2026 05:04:14.113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 21
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  25283
Objects passed selection criteria:  25207
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 20388.2
Average stars matched: 17315 (84.9264 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   247320 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sun Oct 18 00:32:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 419901 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 419901 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits_preview.png'

Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits


renamed 'Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits_preview.png'

Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 765.4159
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 439.5498
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1299.4537
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 534.2124
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1294.0293
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 534.0963
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.69771
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     4.84999990463257 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                  5.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-18T00:03:13.1424390' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-18T05:03:13.1424390' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61331.2105687731 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-18T05:03:23.0439411' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61331.2106833681 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.999484303347 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -9.99945102279081 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     46.4033333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =             180.4125 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.37957170508086 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20684 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20684 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     4.84999990463257 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     4.84999990463257 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  2.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 77.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               912.19 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                  5.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 27.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=                  0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =                  0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits :)

Spent 0.521868 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     4.82999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                  5.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-18T00:04:14.1136089' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-18T05:04:14.1136089' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61331.2112744562 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-18T05:04:24.0153136' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61331.2113890625 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =      359.99948429751 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -9.99945101468333 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     46.4011111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     180.770555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.37962248116354 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20684 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20684 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     4.82999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     4.82999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  2.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 77.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               912.19 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                  5.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 27.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=                  0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =                  0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits :)

Spent 0.531956 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits



fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461331.71068451
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:09.844 -10:05:05.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:09.844 -10:05:05.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0917 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:07.485 -10:04:20.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:07.485 -10:04:20.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0764 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:00:09.844 -10:05:05.83
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:07.485 -10:04:20.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01578 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h6ULuqNuzg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cKc4xwugPa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ooklVNZnT0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xLRb3rLCgX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.590100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.590100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.92

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.92

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=7.4)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3202 out of 3251 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3251 out of 4358 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.6 pix  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 2.3 pix  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.9 mag.  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 15.0 mag.  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 15.5 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
 15.5 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.5 (SNR )  11.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.h6ULuqNuzg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=897, passed=4374
Got 4374 stars (including 3271 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0780, gap 8.0780 to 351.9535
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3184 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0778, gap 8.0778 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3184 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 3182 stars left (next iteration limit 3500)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=3182 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=1080 n_q2=583 n_q3=999 n_q4=520 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3182 N_valid=3182 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.031 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.319 p95_sep_arcsec=1.663 n_q1=1080 n_q2=583 n_q3=999 n_q4=520 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.cKc4xwugPa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, bad_region=887, passed=4358
Got 4358 stars (including 3264 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0779, gap 8.0779 to 351.9535
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3177 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0778, gap 8.0778 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 3177 stars left (next iteration limit 3494)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=3177 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.249 n_q1=1022 n_q2=571 n_q3=1079 n_q4=505 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3177 N_valid=3177 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.010 median_sep_arcsec=0.258 p95_sep_arcsec=1.036 n_q1=1022 n_q2=571 n_q3=1079 n_q4=505 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ooklVNZnT0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=375, bad_region=1372, passed=5550
Got 5550 stars (including 3863 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0190 through 0 to 8.1087, gap 8.1087 to 352.0190
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3764 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3759 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3759 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4444 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0193 through 0 to 8.1093, gap 8.1093 to 352.0193
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3765 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4444 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4444 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 3760 stars left (next iteration limit 4134)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3760 robust_rms=7.824 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.099 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.099 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3760 robust_rms=0.408 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.726 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.726 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3760 robust_rms=0.284 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.314 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.314 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3760 robust_rms_before=1.089 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.285 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.284 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.327 worst_region_rms_after=0.314 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.252 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.314
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.327 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.327 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.285 arcsec matched=3760
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits N_match=3760 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=1173 n_q2=745 n_q3=1151 n_q4=691 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3760 N_valid=3760 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.736 bias_dec_arcsec=0.539 median_sep_arcsec=1.045 p95_sep_arcsec=1.737 n_q1=1173 n_q2=745 n_q3=1151 n_q4=691 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xLRb3rLCgX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=392, bad_region=1364, passed=5548
Got 5548 stars (including 3859 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5548 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0093 through 0 to 8.0904, gap 8.0904 to 352.0093
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3758 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0096 through 0 to 8.0909, gap 8.0909 to 352.0096
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 3753 stars left (next iteration limit 4128)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3753 robust_rms=7.964 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.349 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.349 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3753 robust_rms=0.419 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.919 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.919 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3753 robust_rms=0.286 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.324 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.324 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3753 robust_rms_before=1.098 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.294 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.286 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.350 worst_region_rms_after=0.324 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.258 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.324
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.350 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.350 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.294 arcsec matched=3753
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits N_match=3753 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1170 n_q2=759 n_q3=1131 n_q4=693 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.061
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3753 N_valid=3753 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.736 bias_dec_arcsec=0.531 median_sep_arcsec=1.043 p95_sep_arcsec=1.793 n_q1=1170 n_q2=759 n_q3=1131 n_q4=693 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits sigma_overall=0.357 worst_q_ratio=1.090
ref2=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.120
new1=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits sigma_overall=0.296 worst_q_ratio=1.135
new2=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.061
reference average sigma_overall=0.3165 worst_q_ratio=1.105
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021_astrometric_residuals.png (3182 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490_astrometric_residuals.png (3177 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272_astrometric_residuals.png (3760 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273_astrometric_residuals.png (3753 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:09.844 -10:05:05.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:09.844 -10:05:05.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0917 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:07.485 -10:04:20.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:07.485 -10:04:20.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0764 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:00:09.844 -10:05:05.83
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:07.485 -10:04:20.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01578 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9V1GsNnNBj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OSScWpEOLx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zRzoHOdjF2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FMUgLDHcCv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.414650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.414650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.07

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.07

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=5.5)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 23415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4212 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3459 out of 3633 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 23415 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.4 pix  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 2.2 pix  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.1 mag.  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 15.2 mag.  Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 15.6 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
 15.6 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.6 (SNR )  14.3 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9V1GsNnNBj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=913, bad_region=4921, passed=22724
Got 22724 stars (including 17090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22724 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9459 through 0 to 8.0985, gap 8.0985 to 351.9459
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9463 through 0 to 8.0984, gap 8.0984 to 351.9463
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5319)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=4836 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=1598 n_q2=928 n_q3=1483 n_q4=827 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4836 N_valid=4836 bias_ra_arcsec=0.000 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.353 p95_sep_arcsec=1.499 n_q1=1598 n_q2=928 n_q3=1483 n_q4=827 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OSScWpEOLx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=831, bad_region=4531, passed=23408
Got 23408 stars (including 18214 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23408 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9462 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9462
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9465 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9465
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Excluding outliers - 4838 stars left (next iteration limit 5321)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=4838 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=1569 n_q2=893 n_q3=1543 n_q4=833 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4838 N_valid=4838 bias_ra_arcsec=0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.018 median_sep_arcsec=0.279 p95_sep_arcsec=0.948 n_q1=1569 n_q2=893 n_q3=1543 n_q4=833 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zRzoHOdjF2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1166, bad_region=5554, passed=28377
Got 28377 stars (including 21927 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28377 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9754 through 0 to 8.1459, gap 8.1459 to 351.9754
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.4 to -4.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4790 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9757 through 0 to 8.1465, gap 8.1465 to 351.9757
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.4 to -4.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4790 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 4781 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=7.729 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.893 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.893 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.406 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.852 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.852 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.291 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.350 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.350 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4781 robust_rms_before=1.091 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.291 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.291 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.354 worst_region_rms_after=0.350 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.247 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.350
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.354 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.354 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.291 arcsec matched=4781
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits N_match=4781 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=1506 n_q2=949 n_q3=1482 n_q4=844 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4781 N_valid=4781 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.738 bias_dec_arcsec=0.540 median_sep_arcsec=1.046 p95_sep_arcsec=1.720 n_q1=1506 n_q2=949 n_q3=1482 n_q4=844 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FMUgLDHcCv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1146, bad_region=5578, passed=28271
Got 28271 stars (including 21798 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28271 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9741 through 0 to 8.1355, gap 8.1355 to 351.9741
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9744 through 0 to 8.1362, gap 8.1362 to 351.9744
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4788 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 4781 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=7.804 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.935 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.935 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.426 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.878 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.878 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.293 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.338 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.338 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4781 robust_rms_before=1.098 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.296 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.293 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.352 worst_region_rms_after=0.338 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.244 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.338
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.352 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.352 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.296 arcsec matched=4781
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits N_match=4781 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=1512 n_q2=941 n_q3=1478 n_q4=850 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.072
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4781 N_valid=4781 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.739 bias_dec_arcsec=0.532 median_sep_arcsec=1.043 p95_sep_arcsec=1.789 n_q1=1512 n_q2=941 n_q3=1478 n_q4=850 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:09:28.86 -08:29:47.5:  13.72 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:10:48.67 -09:20:41.1:  15.49 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:42:24.62 -06:00:20.1:  13.55 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:17:28.35 -10:23:32.8:  13.49 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:13:02.68 -05:59:50.8:  13.77 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:48.92 -06:31:08.1:  13.26 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:06:27.05 -13:24:53.8:  13.91 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:48:06.70 -07:36:47.9:  12.81 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:44:44.93 -06:55:22.3:  13.43 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:53:27.90 -09:20:18.5:  15.54 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:09:28.86 -08:29:47.5:  13.97 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:48:06.70 -07:36:47.9:  13.03 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:53:27.90 -09:20:18.5:  15.56 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:42:24.62 -06:00:20.1:  13.81 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:13:02.68 -05:59:50.8:  13.91 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:10:48.67 -09:20:41.1:  15.51 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:17:28.35 -10:23:32.8:  13.61 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:48.92 -06:31:08.1:  13.24 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:06:27.05 -13:24:53.8:  14.28 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:44:44.93 -06:55:22.3:  13.54 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.84 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.82 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:09:28.86 -08:29:47.5: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1620 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.48 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:02.68 -05:59:50.8: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2009 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:06.70 -07:36:47.9: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3107 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.65 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.05 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:44:44.93 -06:55:22.3: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7552 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:48.92 -06:31:08.1: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4315 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:28.35 -10:23:32.8: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0272 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:27.05 -13:24:53.8: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1282 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:42:24.62 -06:00:20.1: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3334 delta=-0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:18.92 -09:31:10.7:  13.82 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:00:47.29 -09:01:10.7:  13.65 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:03:22.10 -10:46:14.1:  13.81 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:44:12.97 -10:50:32.0:  15.41 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:18.92 -09:31:10.7:  13.78 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:00:47.29 -09:01:10.7:  13.84 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:03:22.10 -10:46:14.1:  13.91 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:44:12.97 -10:50:32.0:  15.44 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.80 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.73 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:18.92 -09:31:10.7: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1342 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.86 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:47.29 -09:01:10.7: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1547 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:03:22.10 -10:46:14.1: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1196 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33631.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34368.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35797.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32143_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 32143_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 18.21068    2461331.71068    14.13    00:06:27.01 -13:24:54.6   3868 5215   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 18.21139    2461331.71139    14.13    00:06:27.10 -13:24:53.1   3862 5222   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32145_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 32145_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 18.21068    2461331.71068    14.19    00:13:02.74 -05:59:48.9   2839 0729   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 18.21139    2461331.71139    14.21    00:13:02.63 -05:59:52.6   2833 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32146_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 32146_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 18.21068    2461331.71068    14.25    23:42:24.54 -06:00:21.1   7467 0727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 18.21139    2461331.71139    14.51    23:42:24.69 -06:00:19.2   7461 0735   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32147_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 32147_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 18.21068    2461331.71068    13.96    00:17:28.31 -10:23:32.6   2212 3405   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 18.21139    2461331.71139    14.13    00:17:28.38 -10:23:32.9   2206 3412   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33631_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
Preparing report for the candidate 33631_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33996_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 33996_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 18.21068    2461331.71068    13.29    23:48:06.70 -07:36:48.0   6594 1702   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 18.21139    2461331.71139    13.33    23:48:06.70 -07:36:47.9   6589 1710   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34172_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 34172_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 18.21068    2461331.71068    13.43    23:52:48.93 -06:31:08.0   5890 1036   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 18.21139    2461331.71139    13.43    23:52:48.91 -06:31:08.2   5884 1044   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34368_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
Preparing report for the candidate 34368_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34790_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 34790_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 18.21068    2461331.71068    13.76    23:44:44.97 -06:55:20.4   7105 1285   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 18.21139    2461331.71139    13.75    23:44:44.88 -06:55:24.2   7100 1293   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35521_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 35521_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 18.21068    2461331.71068    14.09    00:09:28.82 -08:29:48.0   3394 2243   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 18.21139    2461331.71139    14.26    00:09:28.90 -08:29:46.9   3388 2250   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35609_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 35609_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 18.21068    2461331.71068    14.11    00:03:22.06 -10:46:14.1   4315 3611   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 18.21139    2461331.71139    14.13    00:03:22.15 -10:46:14.1   4309 3618   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35688_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 35688_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 18.21068    2461331.71068    14.16    23:56:18.90 -09:31:11.0   5362 2853   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 18.21139    2461331.71139    14.11    23:56:18.95 -09:31:10.3   5356 2860   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35758_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 35758_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 10 18.21068    2461331.71068    14.18    00:00:47.31 -09:01:10.6   4694 2552   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 10 18.21139    2461331.71139    14.14    00:00:47.27 -09:01:10.9   4689 2559   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35797_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
Preparing report for the candidate 35797_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35994_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273
The candidate 35994_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 10 18.21139    2461331.71139    14.21    23:50:11.37 -13:49:45.8   6257 5473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_002929_TTUQ2b1x1_2466388_IRDUHv4m/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-18_00-04-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits

**** FOUND  23:50:11.39 -13:49:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:53:27.90 -09:20:18.5
00:10:48.67 -09:20:41.1
23:44:12.97 -10:50:32.0
########### Completed Cet-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
23:53:27.90 -09:20:18.5
00:10:48.67 -09:20:41.1
23:44:12.97 -10:50:32.0
###################################################################################
23:53:27.90 -09:20:18.5  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
00:10:48.67 -09:20:41.1  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
23:44:12.97 -10:50:32.0  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461331.71068451 -observatory V36
15:00:24.79 -20:23:14.4 Mercury (0.1mag)
13:55:58.84 -19:38:43.9 Venus (-4.1mag)
08:55:25.48 +18:44:11.0 Mars (1.0mag)
09:38:34.73 +14:45:49.1 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:40:31.32 +01:24:58.0 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:11:18.68 +20:56:00.2 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:09:41.76 -00:29:45.8 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:09.40 -23:43:18.1 Pluto (14.5mag)
19:22:53.84 -25:44:00.9 Moon (-10.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Oct 18 00:31 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461331.71068451:
09:38:33.45 +14:45:57.0 Io (6.1mag)
09:38:40.83 +14:45:14.6 Europa (6.2mag)
09:38:46.09 +14:44:46.1 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:39:04.77 +14:43:03.8 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:38:50.07 +15:04:03.9 Himalia (15.6mag)
09:38:32.96 +14:45:59.3 Thebe (16.4mag)
09:37:28.81 +15:08:53.7 Elara (17.5mag)
09:40:34.15 +14:09:19.4 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:36:41.96 +15:14:32.4 Carme (18.8mag)
00:40:39.18 +01:24:26.3 Titan (8.2mag)
00:40:25.84 +01:24:47.6 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:40:17.88 +01:22:33.4 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:40:40.87 +01:24:19.8 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:38:47.75 +01:12:33.2 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 18 00:31 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461331.71068451:
03:29:17.98 +20:44:08.9 JWST
11:23:07.77 +46:27:57.5 Chandra
06:07:31.45 +25:51:35.6 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 18 00:31 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461331.71068451 -observatory V36
03:43:36.79 +20:11:29.3 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:31:03.87 -33:19:45.1 14.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:42:15.52 -72:51:06.9 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:14:56.52 +34:50:56.2 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:48:02.94 +48:23:11.2 17.4mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
07:32:33.25 +25:23:56.2 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:04:49.75 +36:25:29.6 16.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:28:41.79 +41:15:02.5 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:46:12.12 -13:39:12.0 16.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:30:00.13 +15:26:14.0 16.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:57:57.65 -03:17:13.8 16.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
19:10:40.56 +62:15:11.5 15.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:28:22.88 +42:13:53.5 17.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:52:12.53 +14:58:39.0 17.7mag A/2026 E1
16:27:46.33 -43:50:02.4 13.2mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
00:09:44.12 +17:50:49.4 17.4mag 2P/Encke
23:06:02.56 -30:06:17.2 14.8mag 10P/Tempel
02:20:01.13 +37:13:39.1 16.6mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:15:46.23 -08:43:11.4 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:18:16.36 -09:01:49.0 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
07:44:21.24 +15:16:46.3 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
02:52:53.33 +13:59:16.7 17.8mag 88P/Howell
10:17:59.80 +15:58:44.4 17.3mag 93P/Lovas
08:03:43.30 +42:06:54.1 17.0mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
09:18:08.24 +11:40:24.3 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:54:54.74 +11:42:03.5 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
14:24:04.86 -34:06:01.2 17.9mag 124P/Mrkos
20:50:35.10 +08:10:16.2 9.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:35:21.86 +00:05:50.0 14.9mag 169P/NEAT
03:24:58.05 +03:45:44.2 14.9mag 220P/McNaught
06:12:35.69 +46:40:26.3 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
07:37:11.80 +25:26:32.6 17.8mag 266P/Christensen
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.6K Oct 18 00:31 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30  SN2026acyb  2026-10-9.85 16.83
03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70  SN2026acvp  2026-10-9.95 17.75
04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20  SN2026adhl  2026-10-9.94 17.52
09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40  SN2026aeif  2026-10-9.47 15.93
02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90  ASASSN-26fl  2026-10-7.9 -0.85
02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00  SN 2026adfy  2026-10-4.88 16.61
22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70  AT2026adgn  2026-10-4.28 -2.56
15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40  ASASSN-26fj  2026-10-2.06 15.91
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90  ASASSN-26fi  2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20  ASASSN-26fh  2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90  AT2026adfv  2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50  SN2026abhc  2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80  SN2026acxa  2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40  ASASSN-26fg  2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40  SN2026aajs  2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70  AT2026acgs  2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10  ASASSN-26ff  2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20  SN2026yjv  2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30  SN 2026aafh  2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00  SN 2026aaks  2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20  SN2026aasi  2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80  SN2026aafk  2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60  SN2026aafs  2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50  SN2026aagh   -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10  ASASSN-26fe  2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30  SN2026aars  2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50  SN 2026znh  2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80  ASASSN-26fd  2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70  ASASSN-26fc  2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70  SN 2026zfw  2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10  SN2026aacj  2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10  SN2026zji  2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70  SN2026aaiv  2026-09-7.22 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60  ASASSN-26fb  2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50  AT2026aabo  2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60  SN 2026zhl  2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70  ASASSN-26fa  2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30  AT2026zwp  2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80  V488  2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60  V8055  2026-08-30.22 10.89
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10  ASASSN-26ez  2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00  AT2026zwo  2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90  AT2026zjy  2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50  SN2026ymb  2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30  SN2026yid  2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60  ASASSN-26ey  2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80  ASASSN-26ex  2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 18 00:31 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0  TCP J18030904+1218140  2026-08-19.5199  14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3  PNV J00425465+4122593  2026-08-25.4712  18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76  PNV J00425038+4118587  2026-09-04.1512  18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4  PNV J00421276+4116284  2026-09-10.9176  18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7  TCP J17520680-2343207  2026-09-08.7896  12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1  PNV J00424094+4115371  2026-09-17.8925  18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8  TCP J08492013-0919158  2026-09-18.4698  13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6  PNV J00421393+4116356  2026-09-22.6597  19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5  TCP J18140158+1513555  2026-09-24.4645  14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5  TCP J00423661+4113505  2026-09-29.7462  17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8  TCP J22034629-1107578  2026-09-29.7438  14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2  TCP J22050206+2049012  2026-10-03.5715  17.13Cmag
00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2  TCP J00381501+4114472  2026-10-08.5978  17.72Cmag
01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4  TCP J01060583+0951204  2026-10-10.8543  14.54Cmag
17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2  TCP J17541876-2736362  2026-10-12.3993  10.8mag
09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2  PNV J09560079+6906152  2026-10-14.9274  19.38Cmag
00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3  PNV J00433083+4126553  2026-10-17.5651  18.61Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 18 00:31 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
19:56:34.057 -38:06:02.65  AT 2026admb  2026-09-29.26 17.441
21:11:46.917 -18:39:21.23  AT 2026adma  2026-09-30.25 19.048
23:46:20.286 +25:38:18.08  AT 2026adlz  2026-10-01.22 19.5529
23:42:44.589 +09:35:30.06  AT 2026adly  2026-09-23.41 19.8987
23:52:26.635 -14:02:49.30  AT 2026adlx  2026-09-30.34 19.438
22:41:52.664 +17:42:20.48  AT 2026adlw  2026-10-01.23 19.435
19:50:54.107 +01:04:30.19  AT 2026adlv  2026-09-29.13 20.1867
17:48:10.167 +61:21:38.28  AT 2026adlu  2026-10-01.13 19.8833
15:57:50.638 +64:00:21.41  SN 2026adlt  2026-10-01.12 19.1733
21:40:50.696 +30:03:31.70  AT 2026adls  2026-09-23.17 20.2316
16:53:05.148 -16:17:35.33  AT 2026adlr  2026-10-01.11 19.4361
16:59:48.022 +32:25:42.51  AT 2026adlq  2026-10-01.12 19.1929
17:01:14.815 +32:03:00.95  AT 2026adlp  2026-08-08.34 21.51
01:08:57.894 +37:28:51.31  AT 2026adlo  2026-08-09.60 21.07
17:22:58.825 -01:42:06.19  AT 2026adln  2026-08-11.30 21.48
01:51:54.295 -07:41:39.60  AT 2026adlm  2026-08-11.55 20.55
23:54:41.347 -08:28:48.23  AT 2026adll  2026-08-13.47 20.7
01:51:09.077 -10:28:35.56  AT 2026adlk  2026-08-13.58 21.09
01:19:13.615 -15:17:20.08  AT 2026adlj  2026-08-12.57 21.5
21:47:01.863 -40:59:10.77  AT 2026adli  2026-09-04.34 20.42
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 18 00:31 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Sun Oct 18 00:31:24 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 22s (0.37 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 5s (0.08 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 2s (0.03 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 34s (0.57 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 6 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 9s (0.15 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 0s (0.00 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 7s (0.12 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 1s (0.02 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 9s (0.15 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 27s (0.45 min)
FIELD_Cet-05-Q2b1x1: 74s (1.23 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 81s (1.35 min)
Finished: Sun Oct 18 00:32:45 CDT 2026