This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 17.1419 2461330.6419 10.15 19:55:21.99 -13:32:06.7
27.66061 -20.17942 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3 Juno 0 -0 0 10.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:55:21.99 -13:32:06.7: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:55:21.99 -13:32:06.7: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461330.6419,10.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261017.1419 10.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 17.1419 2461330.6419 13.37 19:50:03.19 -10:24:48.0
30.07956 -17.68943 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.345 Tercidina 0 0 0 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:50:03.19 -10:24:48.0: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:50:03.19 -10:24:48.0: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461330.6419,13.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261017.1419 13.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 17.1419 2461330.6419 13.44 19:34:47.55 -09:07:52.8
29.59260 -13.74491 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 4.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J1934474-090754
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.202 R1 Y 1.346 R1 730.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:34:47.55 -09:07:52.8: 14.44 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:34:47.55 -09:07:52.8: 14.54 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1934474-090754,2461330.6419,13.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1934474-090754 20261017.1419 13.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.76742150 13.07.2026 06:24:55.218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
First image: 2461234.76742150 13.07.2026 06:24:55.218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Last image: 2461330.64217120 17.10.2026 03:24:33.592 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14134
Objects passed selection criteria: 14087
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9838
Average stars matched: 9232.75 (93.8478 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239840 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 17 00:40:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.76742150 13.07.2026 06:24:55.218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
First image: 2461234.76742150 13.07.2026 06:24:55.218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Last image: 2461330.64217120 17.10.2026 03:24:33.592 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 157
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 34 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 128536
Objects passed selection criteria: 128212
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 92352.5
Average stars matched: 86158 (93.2925 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 552144 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Oct 17 00:42:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461330.64168758
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:52.848 -09:59:47.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45
Second-epoch image center 19:42:52.848 -09:59:47.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0071 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:54.440 -10:00:04.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45
Second-epoch image center 19:42:54.440 -10:00:04.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0109 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:42:52.848 -09:59:47.96
Second-epoch second image center 19:42:54.440 -10:00:04.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00800 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ouC0fupZWG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hRtTQiTGH5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.c5CUyL6JPv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BHId8TUCQI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 17193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6609 to 303.8040 deg, Dec -15.2497 to -4.6824 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6609 to 303.8040 deg, Dec -15.2497 to -4.6824 deg
Loaded 11410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9135 out of 9587 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9587 out of 17193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.678300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.678300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 17193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6609 to 303.8040 deg, Dec -15.2497 to -4.6824 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6609 to 303.8040 deg, Dec -15.2497 to -4.6824 deg
Loaded 11410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9135 out of 9587 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9587 out of 17193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 17184 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6555 to 303.8043 deg, Dec -15.2619 to -4.6821 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6555 to 303.8043 deg, Dec -15.2619 to -4.6821 deg
Loaded 11423 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9132 out of 9602 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9602 out of 17184 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
2.3 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
2.7 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
2.8 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
15.1 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.ouC0fupZWG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1083, bad_region=3020, passed=17193
Got 17193 stars (including 13227 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5375)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.441 n_q1=1847 n_q2=720 n_q3=1530 n_q4=791 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4888 N_valid=4888 bias_ra_arcsec=0.026 bias_dec_arcsec=0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.369 p95_sep_arcsec=1.888 n_q1=1847 n_q2=720 n_q3=1530 n_q4=791 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hRtTQiTGH5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1110, bad_region=3013, passed=17184
Got 17184 stars (including 13206 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17184 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.454 n_q1=1832 n_q2=720 n_q3=1529 n_q4=804 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.161
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4885 N_valid=4885 bias_ra_arcsec=0.031 bias_dec_arcsec=0.007 median_sep_arcsec=0.378 p95_sep_arcsec=1.828 n_q1=1832 n_q2=720 n_q3=1529 n_q4=804 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.c5CUyL6JPv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=368, bad_region=2595, passed=7621
Got 7621 stars (including 4816 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7621 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4738 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4700 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4700 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4700 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4737 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4695 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4695 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4695 stars left (next iteration limit 5170)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4695 robust_rms=7.675 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.885 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.885 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4695 robust_rms=0.530 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.832 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.832 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4695 robust_rms=0.487 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.736 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.736 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4695 robust_rms_before=0.771 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.514 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.487 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.760 worst_region_rms_after=0.736 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.163 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.736
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.760 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.760 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.514 arcsec matched=4695
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits N_match=4695 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.628 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.581 n_q1=1577 n_q2=1322 n_q3=962 n_q4=834 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.292
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4695 N_valid=4695 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.110 bias_dec_arcsec=0.471 median_sep_arcsec=0.680 p95_sep_arcsec=2.223 n_q1=1577 n_q2=1322 n_q3=962 n_q4=834 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.BHId8TUCQI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=437, bad_region=2971, passed=9171
Got 9171 stars (including 5921 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9171 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=7.368 arcsec worst_region_rms=17.394 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=17.394 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.524 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.863 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.863 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.470 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.718 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.718 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4880 robust_rms_before=0.760 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.503 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.470 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.773 worst_region_rms_after=0.718 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.101 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.718
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.773 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.773 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.503 arcsec matched=4880
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.573 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.582 n_q1=1651 n_q2=1355 n_q3=953 n_q4=921 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4880 N_valid=4880 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.099 bias_dec_arcsec=0.484 median_sep_arcsec=0.686 p95_sep_arcsec=2.062 n_q1=1651 n_q2=1355 n_q3=953 n_q4=921 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits sigma_overall=0.499 worst_q_ratio=1.123
ref2=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits sigma_overall=0.510 worst_q_ratio=1.161
new1=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits sigma_overall=0.486 worst_q_ratio=1.292
new2=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits sigma_overall=0.468 worst_q_ratio=1.244
reference average sigma_overall=0.5045 worst_q_ratio=1.142
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042_astrometric_residuals.png (4888 matched stars from wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043_astrometric_residuals.png (4885 matched stars from wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006_astrometric_residuals.png (4695 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007_astrometric_residuals.png (4880 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:55:21.99 -13:32:06.7: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:55:21.99 -13:32:06.7: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21532.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21093_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 21093_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:37.99 -08:14:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21363_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 21363_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:40.01 -07:34:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21532_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 21532_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21558_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 21558_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:33.19 -11:37:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21651_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 21651_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:49.86 -09:50:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21762_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 21762_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:38.00 -13:45:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21774_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 21774_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:38:32.81 -09:57:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21778_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 21778_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:12.45 -07:34:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21861_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 21861_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:39.65 -12:24:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21898_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 21898_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:47.39 -08:00:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21953_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 21953_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:25.79 -14:06:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07365_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 07365_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:25.85 -10:58:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12786_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 12786_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:06.22 -07:36:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aql-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:55:21.99 -13:32:06.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:52.848 -09:59:47.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45
Second-epoch image center 19:42:52.848 -09:59:47.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0071 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:54.440 -10:00:04.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45
Second-epoch image center 19:42:54.440 -10:00:04.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0109 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:42:52.848 -09:59:47.96
Second-epoch second image center 19:42:54.440 -10:00:04.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00800 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LxwXFqe55x
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lO7EJaPul5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3Qskq90IM8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ENdpvrwTSd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151351 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6570 to 303.8111 deg, Dec -15.2567 to -4.6708 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6570 to 303.8111 deg, Dec -15.2567 to -4.6708 deg
Loaded 11427 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8227 out of 10219 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10219 out of 151351 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.506000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.506000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151351 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6570 to 303.8111 deg, Dec -15.2567 to -4.6708 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6570 to 303.8111 deg, Dec -15.2567 to -4.6708 deg
Loaded 11427 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8227 out of 10219 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10219 out of 151351 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 152274 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6475 to 303.8112 deg, Dec -15.2629 to -4.6821 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6475 to 303.8112 deg, Dec -15.2629 to -4.6821 deg
Loaded 11432 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8206 out of 10213 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10213 out of 152274 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 112 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
2.1 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
15.2 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.LxwXFqe55x (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=14347, bad_region=18371, passed=151324
Got 151324 stars (including 119848 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 137711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 137711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 137711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.444 n_q1=1844 n_q2=722 n_q3=1500 n_q4=843 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4909 N_valid=4909 bias_ra_arcsec=0.027 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.364 p95_sep_arcsec=1.667 n_q1=1844 n_q2=722 n_q3=1500 n_q4=843 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lO7EJaPul5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=14548, bad_region=18413, passed=152258
Got 152258 stars (including 120597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 152258 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 138572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 138572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 138572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4903 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits N_match=4903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=1840 n_q2=734 n_q3=1493 n_q4=836 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4903 N_valid=4903 bias_ra_arcsec=0.035 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.374 p95_sep_arcsec=1.640 n_q1=1840 n_q2=734 n_q3=1493 n_q4=836 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.3Qskq90IM8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=5325, bad_region=18215, passed=66568
Got 66568 stars (including 45852 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66568 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5371)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=7.496 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.682 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.682 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.513 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.827 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.827 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.470 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.736 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.736 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4880 robust_rms_before=0.782 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.495 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.470 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.782 worst_region_rms_after=0.736 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.169 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.736
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.782 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.782 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.495 arcsec matched=4880
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.582 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.554 n_q1=1712 n_q2=1211 n_q3=1109 n_q4=848 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4880 N_valid=4880 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.117 bias_dec_arcsec=0.479 median_sep_arcsec=0.688 p95_sep_arcsec=2.004 n_q1=1712 n_q2=1211 n_q3=1109 n_q4=848 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ENdpvrwTSd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=6609, bad_region=19774, passed=76180
Got 76180 stars (including 52916 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76180 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5376)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=7.501 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.245 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.245 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.520 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.876 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.876 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.470 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.741 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.741 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4888 robust_rms_before=0.776 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.507 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.470 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.813 worst_region_rms_after=0.741 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.106 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.741
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.813 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.813 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.507 arcsec matched=4888
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.587 n_q1=1742 n_q2=1205 n_q3=1036 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4888 N_valid=4888 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.106 bias_dec_arcsec=0.492 median_sep_arcsec=0.697 p95_sep_arcsec=2.020 n_q1=1742 n_q2=1205 n_q3=1036 n_q4=905 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_003824_TTUQ2b1x1_2155560_44gVYwEl/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:53:36.61 -09:19:50.3: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:55:04.46 -07:57:49.2: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:53:36.61 -09:19:50.3: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:55:04.46 -07:57:49.2: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:04.46 -07:57:49.2: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0863 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:36.61 -09:19:50.3: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0259 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:52:24.59 -11:22:01.3: 13.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:26:42.80 -07:44:01.0: 13.61 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:50:03.19 -10:24:48.0: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:52:24.59 -11:22:01.3: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:26:42.80 -07:44:01.0: 13.66 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:24.59 -11:22:01.3: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8541 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:42.80 -07:44:01.0: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5013 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:32:20.00 -08:22:12.7: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:26:27.93 -06:34:52.9: 14.96 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:50:03.19 -10:24:48.0: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:26:27.93 -06:34:52.9: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:32:20.00 -08:22:12.7: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:27.93 -06:34:52.9: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0299 delta=0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:32:20.00 -08:22:12.7: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6214 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:28:30.11 -05:44:30.3: 14.71 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:28:30.11 -05:44:30.3: 14.77 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:30.11 -05:44:30.3: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3043 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:34:47.55 -09:07:52.8: 14.44 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:34:47.55 -09:07:52.8: 14.54 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:34:47.55 -09:07:52.8: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4356 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 20:01:20.66 -14:03:00.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 20:01:20.66 -14:03:00.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:20.66 -14:03:00.5: the position falls in a bad CCD region (bad_region.lst) on all measured reference images -- cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out183727.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out183067.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84335.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175156_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175156_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175163_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175163_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175171_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175171_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175172_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175172_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175176_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175176_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:35.86 -13:25:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175177_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175177_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:17.27 -13:50:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175178_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175178_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:13.57 -12:14:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175181_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175181_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:30.13 -06:49:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175182_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175182_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:38.02 -08:14:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175512_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175512_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:39.98 -07:34:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175586_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175586_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175622_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175622_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:21.99 -13:32:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175672_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175672_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175716_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175716_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176043_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 176043_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:47.39 -08:00:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176128_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 176128_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:25.79 -14:06:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176576_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 176576_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176743_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 176743_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176821_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 176821_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176961_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 176961_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176969_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 176969_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177179_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 177179_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177444_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 177444_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:31.26 -08:40:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177518_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 177518_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:17.38 -06:58:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177529_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 177529_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178014_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 178014_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178110_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 178110_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178292_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 178292_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178315_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 178315_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178383_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 178383_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178456_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 178456_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178506_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 178506_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178621_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 178621_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178752_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 178752_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:28.41 -07:03:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178866_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 178866_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:15.18 -10:00:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178907_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 178907_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179046_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 179046_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:37:08.97 -09:54:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179299_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 179299_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179332_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 179332_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179685_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 179685_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179712_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 179712_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179787_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 179787_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179898_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 179898_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179936_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 179936_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179990_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 179990_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180025_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 180025_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180269_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 180269_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180344_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 180344_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180345_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 180345_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180590_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 180590_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180635_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 180635_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180783_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 180783_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180825_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 180825_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181166_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 181166_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181336_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 181336_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181339_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 181339_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181426_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 181426_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:31:16.92 -13:29:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181430_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 181430_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181465_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 181465_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181837_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 181837_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181886_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 181886_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:12.33 -06:31:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181890_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 181890_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182894_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 182894_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183010_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 183010_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183067_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 183067_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183229_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 183229_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183247_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 183247_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:51:58.76 -10:22:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183269_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 183269_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183385_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 183385_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:27:01.28 -07:16:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183458_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 183458_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183541_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 183541_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183593_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 183593_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:20.83 -08:57:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183727_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 183727_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:32:20.00 -08:22:12.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.584 4206585699502031616 293.08275478988 -08.36976112700 12.4155 10.9745 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.584#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183855_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 183855_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183868_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 183868_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184184_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 184184_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184254_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 184254_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184286_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 184286_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184343_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 184343_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184411_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 184411_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184433_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 184433_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184507_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 184507_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:28:49.61 -05:50:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184519_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 184519_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184527_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 184527_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184529_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 184529_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184552_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 184552_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184558_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 184558_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184583_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 184583_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55518_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 55518_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:25.86 -10:58:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84335_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 84335_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91389_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 91389_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:31.03 -08:45:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41852_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 41852_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:56.67 -11:48:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164841_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 164841_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:12.44 -07:34:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44863_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 44863_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:33.21 -11:37:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120952_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 120952_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:22.87 -06:15:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91658_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 91658_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:33:06.07 -08:41:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102317_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 102317_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81323_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 81323_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:23.20 -09:17:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143254_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 143254_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:33:54.55 -08:00:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12155_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 12155_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33784_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 33784_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:39.65 -12:24:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72531_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 72531_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:49.84 -09:50:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79218_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 79218_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101237_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 101237_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:32:53.18 -08:07:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62754_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 62754_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103269_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 103269_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71074_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 71074_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:38:32.79 -09:57:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101359_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 101359_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:06.23 -07:36:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16413_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 16413_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:38.01 -13:45:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114614_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 114614_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:51:51.67 -05:48:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62004_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 62004_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77032_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 77032_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-16_22-24-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks