This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.9126,13.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.4126 13.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.4126 2461326.9126 13.40 06:04:36.35 -12:49:10.9
219.34102 -16.09757 galactic Lep Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was found in ASASSN-V 1" ASASSN-V J060436.31-124910.8
Type: EA
MeanMag 13.64 m Amp. 0.61 m Period 8.6644865 d
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:04:36.35 -12:49:10.9: 14.42 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:04:36.35 -12:49:10.9: 14.40 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.9126,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.4126 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.71137618 18.01.2026 05:04:12.902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
First image: 2461058.71137618 18.01.2026 05:04:12.902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Last image: 2461326.91284887 13.10.2026 09:54:20.142 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12263
Objects passed selection criteria: 12218
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8998.25
Average stars matched: 8374 (93.0625 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 237496 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 13 05:16:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.71137618 18.01.2026 05:04:12.902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
First image: 2461058.71137618 18.01.2026 05:04:12.902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Last image: 2461326.91284887 13.10.2026 09:54:20.142 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 72
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 23 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 80467
Objects passed selection criteria: 80273
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 61163.5
Average stars matched: 56858.8 (92.9619 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 563448 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 13 05:17:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461326.91233336
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:03.497 -10:01:32.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.389 -09:59:40.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:03.497 -10:01:32.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:00.389 -09:59:40.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0335 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:02.111 -10:00:10.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:03.497 -10:01:32.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:02.111 -10:00:10.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0233 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:00.389 -09:59:40.40
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:02.111 -10:00:10.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01102 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9N3G6PilCY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p50sv02jNz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m3WkDvMBiP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HjVa9p8882
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits and wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits and wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits and wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14264 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9996 to 98.2110 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5605 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9996 to 98.2110 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5605 deg
Loaded 10771 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8159 out of 8723 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8723 out of 14264 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.847500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.847500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14264 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9996 to 98.2110 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5605 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9996 to 98.2110 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5605 deg
Loaded 10771 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8159 out of 8723 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8723 out of 14264 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 14284 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9867 to 98.2111 deg, Dec -15.3429 to -4.5605 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9867 to 98.2111 deg, Dec -15.3429 to -4.5605 deg
Loaded 10773 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8169 out of 8723 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8723 out of 14284 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
2.0 pix Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
2.4 pix fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
2.4 pix fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
15.3 mag. Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.9N3G6PilCY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1343, bad_region=2733, passed=14264
Got 14264 stars (including 10431 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14264 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4843 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits N_match=4843 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=1685 n_q2=730 n_q3=1676 n_q4=752 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.p50sv02jNz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1364, bad_region=2703, passed=14284
Got 14284 stars (including 10470 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14284 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12026 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12026 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12026 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1693 n_q2=722 n_q3=1685 n_q4=744 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits -region wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.m3WkDvMBiP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=657, bad_region=2795, passed=9076
Got 9076 stars (including 5817 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4842 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4842 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4841 stars left (next iteration limit 5326)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=8.356 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.321 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.321 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=0.525 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.759 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.759 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.543 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.543 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4841 robust_rms_before=0.655 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.431 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.428 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.577 worst_region_rms_after=0.543 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.916 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.543
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.577 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.577 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.431 arcsec matched=4841
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits N_match=4841 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.471 n_q1=1495 n_q2=1119 n_q3=1291 n_q4=936 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HjVa9p8882 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=674, bad_region=2982, passed=9820
Got 9820 stars (including 6361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9820 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4839 stars left (next iteration limit 5324)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4839 robust_rms=8.196 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.819 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.819 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4839 robust_rms=0.510 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.808 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.808 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4839 robust_rms=0.415 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.547 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.547 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4839 robust_rms_before=0.673 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.422 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.415 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.570 worst_region_rms_after=0.547 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.981 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.547
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.570 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.570 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.422 arcsec matched=4839
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits N_match=4839 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.439 n_q1=1478 n_q2=1092 n_q3=1241 n_q4=1028 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits sigma_overall=0.325 worst_q_ratio=1.232
ref2=Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits sigma_overall=0.336 worst_q_ratio=1.263
new1=fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits sigma_overall=0.442 worst_q_ratio=1.145
new2=fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits sigma_overall=0.436 worst_q_ratio=1.112
reference average sigma_overall=0.3305 worst_q_ratio=1.2475
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190_astrometric_residuals.png (4843 matched stars from wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191_astrometric_residuals.png (4844 matched stars from wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516_astrometric_residuals.png (4841 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517_astrometric_residuals.png (4839 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22003_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 22003_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:04.03 -10:58:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Mon-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:03.497 -10:01:32.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.389 -09:59:40.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:03.497 -10:01:32.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:00.389 -09:59:40.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0335 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:02.111 -10:00:10.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:03.497 -10:01:32.07
Second-epoch image center 06:00:02.111 -10:00:10.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0233 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:00.389 -09:59:40.40
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:02.111 -10:00:10.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01102 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5Lf5vyZttD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits &> /tmp/tmp.N4U6zI15Xb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B7j3yMCRY4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0xKbNaBrXd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits and wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits and wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits and wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 92121 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9939 to 98.2350 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5573 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9939 to 98.2350 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5573 deg
Loaded 10806 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7488 out of 9148 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9148 out of 92121 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.704800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.704800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 92121 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9939 to 98.2350 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5573 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9939 to 98.2350 deg, Dec -15.3489 to -4.5573 deg
Loaded 10806 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7488 out of 9148 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9148 out of 92121 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 92267 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.9848 to 98.2344 deg, Dec -15.3429 to -4.5505 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.9848 to 98.2344 deg, Dec -15.3429 to -4.5505 deg
Loaded 10804 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7526 out of 9140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9140 out of 92267 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 59 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
1.9 pix Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
2.2 pix fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
2.2 pix fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
15.4 mag. Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5Lf5vyZttD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=7576, bad_region=13356, passed=92101
Got 92101 stars (including 72002 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92101 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4843 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits N_match=4843 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=1617 n_q2=737 n_q3=1710 n_q4=779 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.N4U6zI15Xb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=7571, bad_region=13382, passed=92252
Got 92252 stars (including 72080 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92252 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81084 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81084 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81084 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4843 stars left (next iteration limit 5327)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits N_match=4843 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=1642 n_q2=719 n_q3=1707 n_q4=775 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.313
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits -region wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.B7j3yMCRY4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3267, bad_region=14708, passed=57163
Got 57163 stars (including 40442 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57163 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4845 stars left (next iteration limit 5330)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4845 robust_rms=8.191 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.831 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.831 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4845 robust_rms=0.525 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.756 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.756 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4845 robust_rms=0.423 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.556 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.556 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4845 robust_rms_before=0.646 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.428 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.423 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.560 worst_region_rms_after=0.556 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.920 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.556
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.560 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.560 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.428 arcsec matched=4845
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits N_match=4845 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.473 n_q1=1513 n_q2=1090 n_q3=1304 n_q4=938 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0xKbNaBrXd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=3711, bad_region=15201, passed=61340
Got 61340 stars (including 43788 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61340 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4832 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4832 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4832 stars left (next iteration limit 5316)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4832 robust_rms=8.054 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.033 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.033 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4832 robust_rms=0.505 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.809 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.809 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4832 robust_rms=0.407 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.550 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.550 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4832 robust_rms_before=0.656 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.415 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.407 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.565 worst_region_rms_after=0.550 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.989 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.550
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.565 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.565 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.415 arcsec matched=4832
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits N_match=4832 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.444 n_q1=1514 n_q2=1063 n_q3=1236 n_q4=1019 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-53-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0516.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_051430_TTUQ2b1x1_2792474_tjwSo4JR/wcs_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:14:57.72 -10:53:39.4: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:58:46.23 -07:23:21.9: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:50:40.95 -12:49:29.5: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:47:07.75 -13:09:54.1: 14.52 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:02:47.55 -08:42:46.3: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:06:12.55 -08:29:24.9: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:46:27.38 -11:21:02.3: 14.47 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:05:34.94 -11:25:28.7: 14.44 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:16:57.58 -09:26:40.3: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:11:17.87 -09:25:04.0: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:02:47.55 -08:42:46.3: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:14:57.72 -10:53:39.4: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:05:34.94 -11:25:28.7: 14.36 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:06:12.55 -08:29:24.9: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:46:27.38 -11:21:02.3: 14.40 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:50:40.95 -12:49:29.5: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:47:07.75 -13:09:54.1: 14.37 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:58:46.23 -07:23:21.9: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:47.55 -08:42:46.3: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9873 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:14:57.72 -10:53:39.4: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9092 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:40.95 -12:49:29.5: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9366 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:07.75 -13:09:54.1: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3253 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:34.94 -11:25:28.7: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2071 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:12.55 -08:29:24.9: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8265 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:46.23 -07:23:21.9: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2600 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:27.38 -11:21:02.3: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0277 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:16:57.58 -09:26:40.3: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:16:57.58 -09:26:40.3: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6148 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:11:17.87 -09:25:04.0: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:11:17.87 -09:25:04.0: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5380 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:55:40.16 -07:40:18.0: 12.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:53:01.81 -07:22:14.7: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:01:52.71 -14:07:44.8: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:46:19.96 -11:27:59.9: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:06:01.98 -07:35:27.3: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:47:37.64 -12:33:09.9: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:01:52.71 -14:07:44.8: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:52.71 -14:07:44.8: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0469 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:06:01.98 -07:35:27.3: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:46:19.96 -11:27:59.9: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:55:40.16 -07:40:18.0: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:53:01.81 -07:22:14.7: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:01.98 -07:35:27.3: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0909 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:40.16 -07:40:18.0: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1359 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:19.96 -11:27:59.9: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4206 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:53:01.81 -07:22:14.7: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0215 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:51:34.51 -11:07:52.2: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:47:37.64 -12:33:09.9: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:37.64 -12:33:09.9: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4014 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:05:03.59 -12:19:07.6: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:11:03.10 -11:46:13.8: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:42:00.08 -05:53:06.0: 14.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:51:34.51 -11:07:52.2: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:51:34.51 -11:07:52.2: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4766 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:07:01.90 -12:04:14.5: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:14:50.54 -11:09:24.5: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:13:08.23 -06:22:46.6: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:05:03.59 -12:19:07.6: 13.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:03.59 -12:19:07.6: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7824 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:11:03.10 -11:46:13.8: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:11:03.10 -11:46:13.8: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8033 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:42:00.08 -05:53:06.0: 13.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:42:00.08 -05:53:06.0: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6181 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:14:19.02 -06:51:41.4: 13.77 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:13:08.23 -06:22:46.6: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:14:50.54 -11:09:24.5: 13.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:07:01.90 -12:04:14.5: 13.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:13:08.23 -06:22:46.6: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6940 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:14:50.54 -11:09:24.5: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6062 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:01.90 -12:04:14.5: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7927 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:14:19.02 -06:51:41.4: 13.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:14:19.02 -06:51:41.4: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6612 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:16:00.75 -07:45:14.9: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:15:16.99 -05:49:39.8: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:06:03.70 -12:47:46.0: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:16:52.14 -06:27:59.4: 14.26 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:00:51.24 -08:43:08.3: 14.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:56:09.98 -07:29:11.7: 13.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:16:00.75 -07:45:14.9: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:16:00.75 -07:45:14.9: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9066 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:15:16.99 -05:49:39.8: 13.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:06:03.70 -12:47:46.0: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:16:52.14 -06:27:59.4: 14.16 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:15:16.99 -05:49:39.8: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9416 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:03.70 -12:47:46.0: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0552 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:16:52.14 -06:27:59.4: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1160 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:12:38.51 -08:51:53.4: 14.44 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:59:18.19 -11:19:03.2: 15.28 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:48:15.12 -12:30:16.9: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:00:51.24 -08:43:08.3: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:51.24 -08:43:08.3: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0880 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:56:09.98 -07:29:11.7: 14.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:09.98 -07:29:11.7: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1192 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:12:38.51 -08:51:53.4: 14.60 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:59:18.19 -11:19:03.2: 15.45 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:12:38.51 -08:51:53.4: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4932 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:48:15.12 -12:30:16.9: 14.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:18.19 -11:19:03.2: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.5887 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:15.12 -12:30:16.9: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7015 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 05:50:14.65 -11:02:01.9: 15.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-04-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 06:04:36.35 -12:49:10.9: 14.42 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 05:50:14.65 -11:02:01.9: 15.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:14.65 -11:02:01.9: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6837 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-05-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits at 06:04:36.35 -12:49:10.9: 14.40 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:04:36.35 -12:49:10.9: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4104 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80015.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108791_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 108791_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108797_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 108797_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108798_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 108798_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108801_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 108801_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:11.69 -08:35:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108802_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 108802_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108804_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 108804_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108807_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 108807_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:33.31 -12:30:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108808_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 108808_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108809_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 108809_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108810_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 108810_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108816_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 108816_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108821_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 108821_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108827_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 108827_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108830_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 108830_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110984_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 110984_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112245_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 112245_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112450_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 112450_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:42.70 -07:53:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112892_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 112892_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113225_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 113225_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:52.52 -14:08:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113266_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 113266_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:43.54 -12:04:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113662_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 113662_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:57.93 -13:55:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113676_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 113676_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113809_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 113809_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:13.15 -07:42:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114131_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 114131_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:32.89 -10:15:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114170_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 114170_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:18.99 -06:41:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114255_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 114255_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:28.52 -09:36:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114405_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 114405_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:16.26 -13:25:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114657_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 114657_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114878_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 114878_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:02.66 -07:36:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114947_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 114947_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114984_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 114984_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115107_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 115107_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115165_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 115165_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.09 -06:15:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115186_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 115186_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115208_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 115208_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115285_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 115285_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:16.78 -07:05:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115380_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 115380_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115398_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 115398_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115470_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
Preparing report for the candidate 115470_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115489_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 115489_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:57.11 -07:16:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115529_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 115529_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:27.69 -11:15:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115850_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 115850_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:13.05 -06:12:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116244_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 116244_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116387_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 116387_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:03.91 -07:57:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116833_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 116833_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117058_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 117058_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117088_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 117088_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117123_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 117123_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:29.60 -07:56:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117288_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 117288_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117538_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 117538_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:48.82 -08:16:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117558_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 117558_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117879_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 117879_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117888_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 117888_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117889_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 117889_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117892_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 117892_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80015_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
Preparing report for the candidate 80015_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52672_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 52672_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:04.00 -10:58:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46017_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 46017_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:35.62 -10:01:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30686_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517
The candidate 30686_fd_Mon-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_04-54-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0517 did not pass the final checks