This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.3609 2461326.8609 11.73 03:38:26.19 +21:27:34.1
166.91097 -26.81669 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.64 Angelina -1 -1 1 11.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:38:26.19 +21:27:34.1: 16.02 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:38:26.19 +21:27:34.1: 15.55 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.69 +/- 0.17
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.3609* 03 38 26.19 +21 27 34.1 11.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.8609,11.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.3609 11.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.3609 2461326.8609 13.83 03:23:01.12 +23:29:57.1
162.36826 -27.53288 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.830 Petropolitana -0 -1 1 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:01.12 +23:29:57.1: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:01.12 +23:29:57.1: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.3609* 03 23 01.12 +23 29 57.1 13.8 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.8609,13.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.3609 13.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.3609 2461326.8609 13.94 03:22:50.94 +18:47:17.8
165.72550 -31.22644 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.586 Thekla -1 -0 1 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:22:50.94 +18:47:17.8: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:22:50.94 +18:47:17.8: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.3609* 03 22 50.94 +18 47 17.8 13.9 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.8609,13.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.3609 13.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.3609 2461326.8609 14.27 03:44:27.05 +23:31:06.8
166.53700 -24.35585 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.859 Bouzareah -0 -0 0 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:27.05 +23:31:06.8: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:27.05 +23:31:06.8: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.3609* 03 44 27.05 +23 31 06.8 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.8609,14.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.3609 14.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.3609 2461326.8609 14.79 03:45:22.57 +24:39:54.3
165.87099 -23.36180 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.228 Agathe -1 0 1 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:45:22.57 +24:39:54.3: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:45:22.57 +24:39:54.3: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.3609* 03 45 22.57 +24 39 54.3 14.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.8609,14.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.3609 14.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.3609 2461326.8609 14.75 03:33:38.90 +19:32:45.3
167.39593 -28.99270 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.310 Margarita 0 -1 1 15.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:33:38.90 +19:32:45.3: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:33:38.90 +19:32:45.3: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.3609* 03 33 38.90 +19 32 45.3 14.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.8609,14.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.3609 14.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.3609 2461326.8609 15.10 03:52:08.25 +18:57:31.0
171.44687 -26.43719 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1576 Fabiola -0 -1 1 15.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:08.25 +18:57:31.0: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:08.25 +18:57:31.0: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.3609* 03 52 08.25 +18 57 31.0 15.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.8609,15.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.3609 15.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461326.86119208 13.10.2026 08:39:56.996 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10681
Objects passed selection criteria: 10650
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8511.25
Average stars matched: 7819 (91.8666 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235600 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 13 03:56:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461326.86119208 13.10.2026 08:39:56.996 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 96
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.94
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 67221
Objects passed selection criteria: 67013
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 54777
Average stars matched: 50126.2 (91.5097 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 283180 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 13 03:57:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461326.86060660
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:32.920 +21:59:57.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:32.920 +21:59:57.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0020 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:30.541 +22:00:13.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:30.541 +22:00:13.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0121 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:32.920 +21:59:57.61
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:30.541 +22:00:13.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01023 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WQ6EMOzipy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DnUmUP5XvS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jswsx3LfzV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IvkYUfwmAm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.5175 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.5175 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4761 out of 5130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5130 out of 11315 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.WQ6EMOzipy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=882, bad_region=2358, passed=11324
Got 11324 stars (including 8232 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4928 stars left (next iteration limit 5420)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.233 n_q1=1932 n_q2=884 n_q3=1338 n_q4=774 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DnUmUP5XvS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=893, bad_region=2356, passed=11315
Got 11315 stars (including 8229 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4927 stars left (next iteration limit 5419)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.244 n_q1=1928 n_q2=891 n_q3=1332 n_q4=776 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jswsx3LfzV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=699, bad_region=2313, passed=10482
Got 10482 stars (including 7596 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10482 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4930 stars left (next iteration limit 5420)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4930 robust_rms=7.600 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.621 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.621 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4930 robust_rms=0.458 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.972 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.972 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4930 robust_rms=0.335 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.455 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.455 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4930 robust_rms_before=1.181 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.343 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.335 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.492 worst_region_rms_after=0.455 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.049 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.455
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.492 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.492 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.343 arcsec matched=4930
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits N_match=4930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1371 n_q2=834 n_q3=1470 n_q4=1255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.061
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.IvkYUfwmAm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=690, bad_region=2317, passed=10450
Got 10450 stars (including 7566 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4928 stars left (next iteration limit 5418)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4928 robust_rms=7.520 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.891 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.891 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4928 robust_rms=0.463 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.007 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.007 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4928 robust_rms=0.347 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.461 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.461 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4928 robust_rms_before=1.185 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.362 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.347 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.485 worst_region_rms_after=0.461 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.046 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.461
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.485 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.485 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.362 arcsec matched=4928
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits N_match=4928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=1375 n_q2=835 n_q3=1472 n_q4=1246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.078
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.300 worst_q_ratio=1.268
ref2=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.303
new1=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.061
new2=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.078
reference average sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.2855
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (4928 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_astrometric_residuals.png (4927 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438_astrometric_residuals.png (4930 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439_astrometric_residuals.png (4928 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:42:54.02 +22:37:07.7: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:04.53 +21:12:57.4: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:38:26.19 +21:27:34.1: 16.02 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:34.48 +19:39:33.6: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:02.82 +21:42:45.2: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:13.13 +22:06:37.3: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:04.53 +21:12:57.4: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:34.48 +19:39:33.6: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:38:26.19 +21:27:34.1: 15.55 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:42:54.02 +22:37:07.7: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:02.82 +21:42:45.2: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:13.13 +22:06:37.3: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:34.48 +19:39:33.6: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1272 delta=0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.69 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:04.53 +21:12:57.4: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4294 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:02.82 +21:42:45.2: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4581 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:54.02 +22:37:07.7: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4437 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:13.13 +22:06:37.3: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3777 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:38:26.19 +21:27:34.1: ref_mag=15.69 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=11.7288 delta=3.96 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21449.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21449_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
Preparing report for the candidate 21449_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21824_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 21824_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22075_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 22075_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22137_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 22137_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22173_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 22173_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22180_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 22180_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
03:38:26.19 +21:27:34.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:32.920 +21:59:57.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:32.920 +21:59:57.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0020 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:30.541 +22:00:13.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:30.541 +22:00:13.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0121 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:32.920 +21:59:57.61
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:30.541 +22:00:13.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01023 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Os7L9kotbo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HlqsRAhvHh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5dbEhrCvMc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lLX8XseuNO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.4774 to +27.2939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.4774 to 27.2939 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4354 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 71179 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.803800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.803800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.94
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.86
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.86
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.4774 to +27.2939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.4774 to 27.2939 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4354 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 71179 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 71492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6157 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4359 out of 5185 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5185 out of 71492 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 72 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.9 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.7 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Os7L9kotbo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4312, bad_region=11991, passed=71162
Got 71162 stars (including 55414 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71162 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4935 stars left (next iteration limit 5428)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.232 n_q1=1851 n_q2=887 n_q3=1408 n_q4=789 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HlqsRAhvHh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4374, bad_region=12029, passed=71479
Got 71479 stars (including 55644 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71479 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4930 stars left (next iteration limit 5423)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.246 n_q1=1847 n_q2=888 n_q3=1401 n_q4=794 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5dbEhrCvMc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=3422, bad_region=11463, passed=62221
Got 62221 stars (including 47973 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62221 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4927 stars left (next iteration limit 5419)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4927 robust_rms=7.594 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.700 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.700 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4927 robust_rms=0.450 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.007 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.007 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4927 robust_rms=0.330 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.464 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.464 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4927 robust_rms_before=1.163 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.335 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.330 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.496 worst_region_rms_after=0.464 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.058 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.464
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.496 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.496 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.335 arcsec matched=4927
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits N_match=4927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=1398 n_q2=860 n_q3=1465 n_q4=1204 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.061
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lLX8XseuNO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=3407, bad_region=11559, passed=62522
Got 62522 stars (including 48222 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62522 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4924 stars left (next iteration limit 5416)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4924 robust_rms=7.557 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.622 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.622 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4924 robust_rms=0.456 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.023 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.023 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4924 robust_rms=0.341 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.466 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.466 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4924 robust_rms_before=1.163 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.353 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.341 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.498 worst_region_rms_after=0.466 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.049 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.466
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.498 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.498 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.353 arcsec matched=4924
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits N_match=4924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.413 n_q1=1395 n_q2=867 n_q3=1464 n_q4=1198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_035423_TTUQ2b1x1_930414_FcpSx0qy/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:30.09 +24:28:11.6: 14.50 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:22:43.59 +26:02:29.5: 14.64 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:46.49 +22:43:44.8: 14.38 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:00:23.59 +19:51:00.1: 14.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:56.69 +23:39:45.1: 14.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:26.52 +22:20:37.3: 14.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:09.27 +20:36:20.4: 14.65 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:26:10.16 +25:59:40.9: 15.33 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:28:56.84 +25:06:37.7: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:00:23.59 +19:51:00.1: 14.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:26.52 +22:20:37.3: 14.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:22:43.59 +26:02:29.5: 14.56 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:56.69 +23:39:45.1: 14.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:28:56.84 +25:06:37.7: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:26:10.16 +25:59:40.9: 15.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:09.27 +20:36:20.4: 14.71 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:46.49 +22:43:44.8: 14.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:30.09 +24:28:11.6: 14.47 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:22:43.59 +26:02:29.5: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6749 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:26.52 +22:20:37.3: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.3119 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:23.59 +19:51:00.1: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4810 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:56.69 +23:39:45.1: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3821 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:28:56.84 +25:06:37.7: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1374 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:10.16 +25:59:40.9: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0357 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:46.49 +22:43:44.8: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4323 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:30.09 +24:28:11.6: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5249 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:09.27 +20:36:20.4: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6630 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:01.12 +23:29:57.1: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:52.16 +18:47:14.5: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:23.86 +19:48:46.5: 14.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:27.05 +23:31:06.8: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:22:50.94 +18:47:17.8: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:10.44 +20:15:12.1: 14.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:58:41.76 +23:51:22.7: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:49.18 +25:53:24.2: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:01.12 +23:29:57.1: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:26:47.01 +23:41:43.9: 14.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:52.16 +18:47:14.5: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:10.44 +20:15:12.1: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:22:50.94 +18:47:17.8: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:27.05 +23:31:06.8: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:49.18 +25:53:24.2: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:23.86 +19:48:46.5: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:58:41.76 +23:51:22.7: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:07.11 +21:12:58.8: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:52.16 +18:47:14.5: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0216 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:10.44 +20:15:12.1: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1028 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:49.18 +25:53:24.2: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2871 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:23.86 +19:48:46.5: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2595 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:41.76 +23:51:22.7: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2913 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:26:47.01 +23:41:43.9: 14.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:47.01 +23:41:43.9: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4452 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:07.11 +21:12:58.8: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:07.11 +21:12:58.8: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3879 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:56:59.99 +21:54:20.6: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:11.66 +19:50:30.9: 14.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:52.75 +21:09:09.0: 14.53 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:43.02 +25:03:01.0: 14.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:00:30.65 +21:24:07.0: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:11.66 +19:50:30.9: 14.22 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:52.75 +21:09:09.0: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:56:59.99 +21:54:20.6: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:00:30.65 +21:24:07.0: 14.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:43.02 +25:03:01.0: 14.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:52.75 +21:09:09.0: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4542 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:11.66 +19:50:30.9: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5005 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:43.02 +25:03:01.0: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5203 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:59.99 +21:54:20.6: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6419 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:30.65 +21:24:07.0: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5707 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:53:07.96 +21:52:08.7: 14.56 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:59:32.52 +22:13:08.3: 15.01 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:53:07.96 +21:52:08.7: 14.44 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:07.96 +21:52:08.7: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6629 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:59:32.52 +22:13:08.3: 14.90 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:32.52 +22:13:08.3: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7219 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:39:20.27 +21:52:03.6: 15.43 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:27.25 +18:35:14.0: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:10.94 +23:00:53.2: 14.90 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:35:07.64 +20:12:04.1: 15.19 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:45:22.57 +24:39:54.3: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:35:07.64 +20:12:04.1: 14.98 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:27.25 +18:35:14.0: 14.47 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:45:22.57 +24:39:54.3: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:39:20.27 +21:52:03.6: 15.18 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:10.94 +23:00:53.2: 14.90 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:35:07.64 +20:12:04.1: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8489 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:27.25 +18:35:14.0: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5712 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:20.27 +21:52:03.6: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9524 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:10.94 +23:00:53.2: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7333 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:33:38.90 +19:32:45.3: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:45:34.94 +24:25:03.9: 15.21 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:33:38.90 +19:32:45.3: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:45:34.94 +24:25:03.9: 15.18 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:34.94 +24:25:03.9: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.8994 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:54:04.01 +22:31:58.9: 14.82 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:47:09.49 +23:44:31.0: 14.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:08.72 +25:19:13.6: 15.31 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:26:59.25 +20:40:13.0: 15.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:26:59.25 +20:40:13.0: 15.31 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:54:04.01 +22:31:58.9: 14.91 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:08.72 +25:19:13.6: 15.24 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:47:09.49 +23:44:31.0: 15.23 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:59.25 +20:40:13.0: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0315 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:04.01 +22:31:58.9: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8574 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:08.72 +25:19:13.6: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9942 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:09.49 +23:44:31.0: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9669 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:39.56 +24:58:34.1: 15.02 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:39.56 +24:58:34.1: 15.16 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:24:57.01 +25:58:02.9: 15.24 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:39.31 +17:52:04.0: 15.29 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:39.56 +24:58:34.1: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9149 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:58:43.56 +23:28:51.6: 14.74 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:00:55.56 +25:09:59.6: 15.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:58:43.56 +23:28:51.6: 14.75 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:24:57.01 +25:58:02.9: 15.25 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:43.56 +23:28:51.6: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.9933 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:39.31 +17:52:04.0: 15.49 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:00:55.56 +25:09:59.6: 15.21 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:24:57.01 +25:58:02.9: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0617 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:39.31 +17:52:04.0: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0897 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:55.56 +25:09:59.6: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8720 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:43:54.17 +22:17:59.6: 14.86 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:43:54.17 +22:17:59.6: 14.87 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:52.27 +23:54:49.9: 15.38 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:54.17 +22:17:59.6: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.9596 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:32.27 +19:11:24.2: 15.46 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:08.25 +18:57:31.0: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:31.38 +20:22:20.2: 15.44 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:32.27 +19:11:24.2: 15.31 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:52.27 +23:54:49.9: 15.52 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:31.38 +20:22:20.2: 15.27 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:32.27 +19:11:24.2: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1401 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:52.27 +23:54:49.9: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1862 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:31.38 +20:22:20.2: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1594 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:08.25 +18:57:31.0: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:02.64 +23:23:29.9: 15.54 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:59.89 +21:08:06.4: 15.47 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:57:29.26 +25:47:09.4: 15.24 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:59.16 +17:48:21.1: 15.40 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:02.64 +23:23:29.9: 15.45 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.49 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:02.64 +23:23:29.9: ref_mag=15.49 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0648 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:57:29.26 +25:47:09.4: 15.40 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:59.16 +17:48:21.1: 15.24 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:59.16 +17:48:21.1: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1331 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:59.89 +21:08:06.4: 15.55 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:29.26 +25:47:09.4: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1582 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:59.89 +21:08:06.4: ref_mag=15.50 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1267 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:02.66 +25:56:12.6: 15.16 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:28:10.77 +18:33:07.0: 15.70 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:47:51.99 +19:41:22.0: 15.19 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:42.73 +24:57:38.4: 15.30 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:02.66 +25:56:12.6: 15.29 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:02.66 +25:56:12.6: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.2004 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:28:10.77 +18:33:07.0: 15.60 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:47:51.99 +19:41:22.0: 15.48 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.65 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:28:10.77 +18:33:07.0: ref_mag=15.65 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.2126 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:42.73 +24:57:38.4: 15.14 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:51.99 +19:41:22.0: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1577 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:42.73 +24:57:38.4: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1010 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90685.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91321.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92649.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out95370.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out95653.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out96580.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86075_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 86075_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86100_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 86100_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86102_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 86102_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86103_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 86103_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86105_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 86105_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86108_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 86108_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86109_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 86109_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86113_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 86113_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86114_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 86114_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:46.60 +24:19:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86117_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 86117_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88182_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 88182_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:40.53 +18:47:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88343_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 88343_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:07.69 +23:38:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89258_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 89258_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:24.23 +22:45:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89330_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 89330_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:51.44 +23:11:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89470_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 89470_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:49.83 +23:15:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89483_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 89483_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:50.29 +24:29:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89674_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 89674_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:08.43 +23:20:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89786_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 89786_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:12.99 +23:36:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89787_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 89787_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:23.46 +24:31:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90685_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
Preparing report for the candidate 90685_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90687_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 90687_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:36.97 +25:08:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90910_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 90910_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:12.85 +25:15:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91223_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 91223_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:22:37.42 +24:53:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91321_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
Preparing report for the candidate 91321_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91427_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 91427_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91605_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 91605_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91708_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 91708_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:15.07 +24:34:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92470_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 92470_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92562_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 92562_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92640_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 92640_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92649_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
Preparing report for the candidate 92649_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92670_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 92670_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:20.87 +24:28:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93049_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 93049_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93098_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 93098_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93461_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 93461_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93580_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 93580_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94084_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 94084_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94088_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 94088_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94097_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 94097_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94179_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 94179_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:51.45 +24:18:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94186_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 94186_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94402_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 94402_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94517_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 94517_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94663_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 94663_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95040_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 95040_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95370_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
Preparing report for the candidate 95370_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95481_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 95481_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95653_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
Preparing report for the candidate 95653_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95662_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 95662_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95681_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 95681_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95690_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 95690_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95769_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 95769_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95789_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 95789_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95845_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 95845_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95859_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 95859_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96169_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 96169_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96215_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 96215_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96386_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 96386_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96399_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 96399_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96460_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 96460_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96480_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 96480_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96560_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 96560_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96580_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
Preparing report for the candidate 96580_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96605_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 96605_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96630_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 96630_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96636_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 96636_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96643_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 96643_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96732_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 96732_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96769_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 96769_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96785_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 96785_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96888_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 96888_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44075_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 44075_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_03-39-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
