This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2765 2461326.7765 11.49 02:06:21.12 -06:28:19.4
167.07130 -62.73409 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.360 Carlova -0 -0 0 12.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:06:21.12 -06:28:19.4: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:06:21.12 -06:28:19.4: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2765* 02 06 21.12 -06 28 19.4 11.5 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7765,11.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2765 11.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2765 2461326.7765 12.77 02:15:49.90 -08:25:02.5
173.71919 -62.63922 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 1.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1093 Freda -0 -0 0 13.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:15:49.90 -08:25:02.5: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:15:49.90 -08:25:02.5: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2765* 02 15 49.90 -08 25 02.5 12.8 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7765,12.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2765 12.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.2765 2461326.7765 13.90 02:07:05.49 -09:07:13.3
171.26241 -64.63145 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.891 Gunhild 1 0 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:07:05.49 -09:07:13.3: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:07:05.49 -09:07:13.3: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.2765* 02 07 05.49 -09 07 13.3 13.9 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461326.7765,13.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261013.2765 13.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.64036141 21.01.2026 03:21:57.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
First image: 2461061.64036141 21.01.2026 03:21:57.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Last image: 2461326.77673078 13.10.2026 06:38:19.539 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5222
Objects passed selection criteria: 5204
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3855.5
Average stars matched: 3762.5 (97.5879 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 231772 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 13 02:24:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q1: 209 -> 612, 65.850% > 20%; fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits vs fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q2: 502 -> 299, 40.438% > 20%; fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits vs fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q4: 544 -> 294, 45.956% > 20%; fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits vs fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.64036141 21.01.2026 03:21:57.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
First image: 2461061.64036141 21.01.2026 03:21:57.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Last image: 2461326.77673078 13.10.2026 06:38:19.539 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 82
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27798
Objects passed selection criteria: 27710
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 20190.5
Average stars matched: 19473 (96.4463 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 251688 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 13 02:25:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461326.77624182
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:18.043 -10:00:06.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:02.754 -10:03:31.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:18.043 -10:00:06.68
Second-epoch image center 02:34:02.754 -10:03:31.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0847 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:02.045 -10:03:28.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:18.043 -10:00:06.68
Second-epoch image center 02:34:02.045 -10:03:28.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0864 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:34:02.754 -10:03:31.54
Second-epoch second image center 02:34:02.045 -10:03:28.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00300 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gj0WWnYzKQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0eBCXyNwTl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gepLpDRGKC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uEpN5nFN0S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5469 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5514 to 46.7197 deg, Dec -15.3148 to -4.5789 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5514 to 46.7197 deg, Dec -15.3148 to -4.5789 deg
Loaded 4380 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3506 out of 3625 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3625 out of 5469 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.847200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.847200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5469 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5514 to 46.7197 deg, Dec -15.3148 to -4.5789 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5514 to 46.7197 deg, Dec -15.3148 to -4.5789 deg
Loaded 4380 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3506 out of 3625 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3625 out of 5469 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 5437 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5476 to 46.7198 deg, Dec -15.3252 to -4.5789 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5476 to 46.7198 deg, Dec -15.3252 to -4.5789 deg
Loaded 4384 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3482 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 5437 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
2.0 pix Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
3.6 pix fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
3.7 pix fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
15.3 mag. Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.gj0WWnYzKQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=346, bad_region=0, passed=5469
Got 5469 stars (including 5113 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5469 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5469 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5469 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5469 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.263 n_q1=1140 n_q2=1288 n_q3=1214 n_q4=1211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits -region wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0eBCXyNwTl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=355, bad_region=0, passed=5437
Got 5437 stars (including 5070 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5437 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5437 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5437 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5437 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5340)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=1133 n_q2=1306 n_q3=1200 n_q4=1216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.406
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits -region wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.gepLpDRGKC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=121, bad_region=0, passed=2367
Got 2367 stars (including 2242 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2367 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2159 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2159 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2157 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2159 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2160 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2160 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2160 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 2160 stars left (next iteration limit 2374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2160 robust_rms=14.008 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.601 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.601 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2160 robust_rms=0.522 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.652 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.595 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2160 robust_rms=0.361 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.587 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.422 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2160 robust_rms_before=0.859 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.317 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.361 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.468 worst_region_rms_after=0.587 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.973 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.422
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.468 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.468 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.317 arcsec matched=2160
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits N_match=2160 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.226 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=209 n_q2=502 n_q3=905 n_q4=544 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.529
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.uEpN5nFN0S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=113, bad_region=0, passed=2265
Got 2265 stars (including 2149 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2265 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2084 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2084 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2084 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2252 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2084 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2084 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2253 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2084 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2253 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 2084 stars left (next iteration limit 2292)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2084 robust_rms=9.119 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.727 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.043 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2084 robust_rms=0.462 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.625 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.625 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2084 robust_rms=0.320 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.480 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.416 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2084 robust_rms_before=0.803 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.313 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.320 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.481 worst_region_rms_after=0.480 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.991 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.416
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.481 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.481 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.313 arcsec matched=2084
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits N_match=2084 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=612 n_q2=299 n_q3=879 n_q4=294 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.587
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits sigma_overall=0.288 worst_q_ratio=1.297
ref2=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits sigma_overall=0.303 worst_q_ratio=1.406
new1=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.529
new2=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.587
reference average sigma_overall=0.2955 worst_q_ratio=1.3515
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q1: 209 -> 612, 65.850% > 20%; fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits vs fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q2: 502 -> 299, 40.438% > 20%; fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits vs fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q4: 544 -> 294, 45.956% > 20%; fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits vs fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120_astrometric_residuals.png (4853 matched stars from wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121_astrometric_residuals.png (4855 matched stars from wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278_astrometric_residuals.png (2160 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279_astrometric_residuals.png (2084 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:06:21.12 -06:28:19.4: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:06:21.12 -06:28:19.4: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20333.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20333_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 20333_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
02:06:21.12 -06:28:19.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:18.043 -10:00:06.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:02.754 -10:03:31.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:18.043 -10:00:06.68
Second-epoch image center 02:34:02.754 -10:03:31.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0847 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:02.045 -10:03:28.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:18.043 -10:00:06.68
Second-epoch image center 02:34:02.045 -10:03:28.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0864 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:34:02.754 -10:03:31.54
Second-epoch second image center 02:34:02.045 -10:03:28.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00300 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3drQFiV1za
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LAHT2rg8X6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gyN9R6Z2fr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BjmCA7Dc2t
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29449 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5478 to 46.7773 deg, Dec -15.3208 to -4.5602 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5478 to 46.7773 deg, Dec -15.3208 to -4.5602 deg
Loaded 4410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3522 out of 3762 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3762 out of 29449 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.750050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.750050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29449 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5478 to 46.7773 deg, Dec -15.3208 to -4.5602 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5478 to 46.7773 deg, Dec -15.3208 to -4.5602 deg
Loaded 4410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3522 out of 3762 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3762 out of 29449 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 29614 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5426 to 46.7769 deg, Dec -15.3320 to -4.5642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5426 to 46.7769 deg, Dec -15.3320 to -4.5642 deg
Loaded 4413 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3508 out of 3765 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3765 out of 29614 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 67 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
1.9 pix Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
3.4 pix fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
15.5 mag. Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3drQFiV1za (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=996, bad_region=22, passed=29438
Got 29438 stars (including 28362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29438 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29438 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29438 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29438 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4846 stars left (next iteration limit 5330)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits N_match=4846 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=1183 n_q2=1259 n_q3=1227 n_q4=1177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.301
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits -region wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.LAHT2rg8X6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1056, bad_region=21, passed=29593
Got 29593 stars (including 28468 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29593 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4850 stars left (next iteration limit 5335)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits N_match=4850 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=1170 n_q2=1263 n_q3=1234 n_q4=1183 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.361
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits -region wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.gyN9R6Z2fr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=375, bad_region=13, passed=11458
Got 11458 stars (including 11051 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4823 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11453 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11453 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11453 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4823 stars left (next iteration limit 5305)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4823 robust_rms=13.796 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.207 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.207 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4823 robust_rms=0.636 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.842 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.777 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4823 robust_rms=0.503 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.828 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.612 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4823 robust_rms_before=0.933 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.468 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.636 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.745 worst_region_rms_after=0.842 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.081 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.777
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.745 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.745 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.468 arcsec matched=4823
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits N_match=4823 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.662 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=476 n_q2=1145 n_q3=1955 n_q4=1247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.504
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.BjmCA7Dc2t (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=363, bad_region=14, passed=10949
Got 10949 stars (including 10548 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10949 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4858 stars left (next iteration limit 5343)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=9.414 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.533 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.201 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=0.610 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.835 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.786 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=0.501 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.788 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.635 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4858 robust_rms_before=0.898 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.497 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.501 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.769 worst_region_rms_after=0.788 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.076 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.635
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.769 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.769 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.497 arcsec matched=4858
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits N_match=4858 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.717 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.460 n_q1=1440 n_q2=749 n_q3=1997 n_q4=672 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.573
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-37-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0278.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_013911_TTUQ1b1x1_3530023_qnV34zrz/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:15:49.90 -08:25:02.5: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:15:49.90 -08:25:02.5: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:07:05.49 -09:07:13.3: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:07:05.49 -09:07:13.3: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32347.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32609.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32132_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32132_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32133_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32133_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32149_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32149_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32177_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32177_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32184_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32184_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32187_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32187_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32190_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32190_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:06:21.14 -06:28:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32192_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32192_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32196_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32196_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32202_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32202_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32214_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32214_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32220_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32220_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32247_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32247_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32268_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32268_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32289_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32289_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32297_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32297_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32324_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32324_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32332_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32332_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32336_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32336_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32347_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 32347_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32349_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32349_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32352_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32352_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32367_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32367_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32371_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32371_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32391_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32391_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32402_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32402_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32406_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32406_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32418_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32418_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32431_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32431_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32447_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32447_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32461_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32461_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32468_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32468_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32471_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32471_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:02:42.86 -07:39:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32476_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32476_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32502_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32502_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32516_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32516_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32518_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32518_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32532_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32532_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32540_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32540_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32550_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32550_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32551_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32551_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32553_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32553_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32559_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32559_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32569_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32569_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32580_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32580_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32581_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32581_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32588_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32588_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32592_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32592_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32607_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32607_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32609_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
Preparing report for the candidate 32609_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32614_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32614_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32616_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32616_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32625_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32625_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32632_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32632_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32633_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32633_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32635_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32635_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32636_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32636_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32642_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32642_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32649_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32649_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32655_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32655_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32666_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32666_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32667_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32667_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32672_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32672_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32673_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32673_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32674_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32674_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32681_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 32681_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11888_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279
The candidate 11888_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-13_01-38-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0279 did not pass the final checks