NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cet-05-Q2b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 13.22414    2461326.72414    12.79    23:55:03.48 -08:50:59.9   5540 2469   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.22461    2461326.72461    12.76    23:55:03.48 -08:51:00.1   5545 2470   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 13.2244  2461326.7244  12.78  23:55:03.48 -08:51:00.0
 84.20501 -67.37896 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
217 Eudora                  -0      0       0  12.7     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:55:03.48 -08:51:00.0:  15.50 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:55:03.48 -08:51:00.0:  15.55 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 13.22414    2461326.72414    13.36    00:14:39.46 -09:25:51.3   2614 2837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.22461    2461326.72461    13.35    00:14:39.42 -09:25:50.8   2620 2838   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 13.2244  2461326.7244  13.36  00:14:39.44 -09:25:51.1
 95.07034 -70.28689 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
906 Repsolda                -0      0       1  13.3     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:14:39.44 -09:25:51.1:  15.44 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:14:39.44 -09:25:51.1:  15.49 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 10 13.22414    2461326.72414    13.90    23:46:44.55 -11:09:28.3   6773 3870   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.22461    2461326.72461    13.86    23:46:44.57 -11:09:27.4   6779 3872   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 13.2244  2461326.7244  13.88  23:46:44.56 -11:09:27.8
 76.22125 -67.94814 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
1133 Lugduna                  0      0       1  13.9    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:46:44.56 -11:09:27.8:  15.43 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:46:44.56 -11:09:27.8:  15.42 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 3

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-05-Q2b1x1
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 58678 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 58678 MB free at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits_preview.png'
Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits

renamed 'Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits_preview.png'
Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 765.4159 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 439.5498 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1389.8578 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 515.6034 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1390.5109 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 513.6271 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.81582 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.004 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 23.4599990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 24.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-13T00:22:36.0179195' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-13T05:22:36.0179195' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61326.2240279745 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-13T05:22:45.9197356' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61326.2241425812 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.999541624091 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99950042743025 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 46.4036111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 180.308333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.37956535847818 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20711 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20711 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.4599990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.4599990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 18.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 69.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.82 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 35.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 22.00176 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 12.200976 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits :) Spent 0.763562 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 23.4899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 24.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-13T00:23:16.1180922' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-13T05:23:16.1180922' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61326.2244921066 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-13T05:23:26.0217549' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61326.2246067245 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.999541624304 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99950042059445 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 46.4027777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 180.546944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.37958439855797 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20711 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20711 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.4899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.4899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 18.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 69.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.82 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 35.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 22.00176 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 12.200976 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits :) Spent 0.657608 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461326.72414372 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:05.729 -10:03:02.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:05.729 -10:03:02.52 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0535 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:07.975 -10:02:54.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:07.975 -10:02:54.90 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0561 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:00:05.729 -10:03:02.52 Second-epoch second image center 00:00:07.975 -10:02:54.90 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00945 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0eNDynEkdk Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1rDcL72A7z Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iJ9UeIEjf8 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AbHEPLimpo Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.590100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.590100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=7.4) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3202 out of 3251 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3251 out of 4358 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=6.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.6 pix Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 2.3 pix Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.9 mag. Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 15.0 mag. Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.0eNDynEkdk (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=897, passed=4374 Got 4374 stars (including 3271 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0780, gap 8.0780 to 351.9535 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3184 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3182 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0778, gap 8.0778 to 351.9539 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3184 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 3182 stars left (next iteration limit 3500) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=3182 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=1080 n_q2=583 n_q3=999 n_q4=520 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.1rDcL72A7z (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, bad_region=887, passed=4358 Got 4358 stars (including 3264 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0779, gap 8.0779 to 351.9535 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3177 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0778, gap 8.0778 to 351.9539 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 3177 stars left (next iteration limit 3494) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=3177 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.249 n_q1=1022 n_q2=571 n_q3=1079 n_q4=505 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.iJ9UeIEjf8 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=331, bad_region=1201, passed=4945 Got 4945 stars (including 3469 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4945 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9974 through 0 to 8.0905, gap 8.0905 to 351.9974 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3379 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3375 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3375 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3375 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3984 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9977 through 0 to 8.0909, gap 8.0909 to 351.9977 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3380 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3375 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3984 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3375 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3984 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 3375 stars left (next iteration limit 3712) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3375 robust_rms=7.781 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.348 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.348 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3375 robust_rms=0.344 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.797 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.797 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3375 robust_rms=0.269 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.347 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.347 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3375 robust_rms_before=1.015 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.273 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.269 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.357 worst_region_rms_after=0.347 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.192 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.347 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.357 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.357 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.273 arcsec matched=3375 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=3375 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=1036 n_q2=683 n_q3=1035 n_q4=621 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.022 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.AbHEPLimpo (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=336, bad_region=1208, passed=4916 Got 4916 stars (including 3426 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4916 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0190 through 0 to 8.0905, gap 8.0905 to 352.0190 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3337 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3336 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3336 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3336 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3946 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.0193 through 0 to 8.0909, gap 8.0909 to 352.0193 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3338 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3336 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3946 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3336 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3946 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 3336 stars left (next iteration limit 3669) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3336 robust_rms=7.824 arcsec worst_region_rms=17.061 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=17.061 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3336 robust_rms=0.358 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.801 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.801 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3336 robust_rms=0.268 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.348 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.348 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3336 robust_rms_before=1.031 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.281 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.268 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.363 worst_region_rms_after=0.348 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.228 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.348 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.363 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.363 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.281 arcsec matched=3336 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits N_match=3336 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=1026 n_q2=680 n_q3=1015 n_q4=615 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits sigma_overall=0.357 worst_q_ratio=1.090 ref2=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.120 new1=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits sigma_overall=0.282 worst_q_ratio=1.022 new2=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits sigma_overall=0.292 worst_q_ratio=1.089 reference average sigma_overall=0.3165 worst_q_ratio=1.105 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021_astrometric_residuals.png (3182 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490_astrometric_residuals.png (3177 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (3375 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259_astrometric_residuals.png (3336 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:05.729 -10:03:02.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:05.729 -10:03:02.52 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0535 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:07.975 -10:02:54.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:07.975 -10:02:54.90 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0561 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:00:05.729 -10:03:02.52 Second-epoch second image center 00:00:07.975 -10:02:54.90 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00945 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hT29zyhfYS Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.udxVJK84ai Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jmEKGGAfLf Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KnARgR9h8F Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.414650 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.414650 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.07 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.07
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=5.5) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 23415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4212 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3459 out of 3633 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 23415 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 18 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 2.2 pix Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 2.1 pix fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.1 mag. Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 15.2 mag. Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.hT29zyhfYS (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=913, bad_region=4921, passed=22724 Got 22724 stars (including 17090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22724 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9459 through 0 to 8.0985, gap 8.0985 to 351.9459 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4836 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9463 through 0 to 8.0984, gap 8.0984 to 351.9463 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5319) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=4836 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=1598 n_q2=928 n_q3=1483 n_q4=827 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.udxVJK84ai (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=831, bad_region=4531, passed=23408 Got 23408 stars (including 18214 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23408 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9462 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9462 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9465 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9465 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4838 stars left (next iteration limit 5321) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=4838 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=1569 n_q2=893 n_q3=1543 n_q4=833 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.jmEKGGAfLf (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=974, bad_region=4715, passed=24955 Got 24955 stars (including 19499 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24955 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9587 through 0 to 8.1029, gap 8.1029 to 351.9587 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4826 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21427 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9589 through 0 to 8.1035, gap 8.1035 to 351.9589 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21427 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21427 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4826 stars left (next iteration limit 5308) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4826 robust_rms=7.678 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.648 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.648 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4826 robust_rms=0.367 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.766 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.766 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4826 robust_rms=0.286 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.383 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.383 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4826 robust_rms_before=1.021 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.285 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.286 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.396 worst_region_rms_after=0.383 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.177 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.383 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.396 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.396 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.285 arcsec matched=4826 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=4826 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.272 n_q1=1545 n_q2=943 n_q3=1494 n_q4=844 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.053 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.KnARgR9h8F (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=991, bad_region=4744, passed=25150 Got 25150 stars (including 19664 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25150 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9745 through 0 to 8.1109, gap 8.1109 to 351.9745 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4833 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21604 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9748 through 0 to 8.1115, gap 8.1115 to 351.9748 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21604 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21604 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4833 stars left (next iteration limit 5316) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=7.701 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.619 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.619 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=0.374 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.736 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.736 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=0.287 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.393 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.393 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4833 robust_rms_before=1.035 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.287 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.287 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.387 worst_region_rms_after=0.393 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.214 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.393 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.387 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.387 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.287 arcsec matched=4833 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits N_match=4833 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1551 n_q2=940 n_q3=1497 n_q4=845 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.027 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:55:03.48 -08:51:00.0: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:17:43.35 -11:13:12.0: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:55:28.04 -08:53:59.5: 14.00 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:14:39.44 -09:25:51.1: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:42:48.73 -12:57:58.8: 13.26 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:48.92 -06:31:08.1: 13.26 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:17:28.32 -10:23:32.3: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:48:06.68 -07:36:47.8: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:44:44.91 -06:55:23.6: 13.40 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:13:02.57 -05:59:52.0: 13.82 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:55:28.04 -08:53:59.5: 14.26 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:48.92 -06:31:08.1: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:17:43.35 -11:13:12.0: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:48.92 -06:31:08.1: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4604 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:55:03.48 -08:51:00.0: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:48:06.68 -07:36:47.8: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.68 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:28.04 -08:53:59.5: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3433 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:43.35 -11:13:12.0: ref_mag=11.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9051 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:17:28.32 -10:23:32.3: 13.59 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:14:39.44 -09:25:51.1: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:42:48.73 -12:57:58.8: 13.48 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:06.68 -07:36:47.8: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2934 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:44:44.91 -06:55:23.6: 13.48 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:42:48.73 -12:57:58.8: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1070 delta=-0.76 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:28.32 -10:23:32.3: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1479 delta=-0.64 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:44:44.91 -06:55:23.6: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6773 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:13:02.57 -05:59:52.0: 14.01 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:02.57 -05:59:52.0: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2688 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:54:09.80 -09:18:47.4: 14.38 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:46:44.56 -11:09:27.8: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:00:47.31 -09:01:10.1: 13.67 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:03:22.03 -10:46:14.0: 13.77 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:59.38 -08:18:33.0: 14.47 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:18.85 -09:31:12.1: 13.86 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:54:09.80 -09:18:47.4: 14.31 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:00:47.31 -09:01:10.1: 13.86 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:47.31 -09:01:10.1: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0699 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:09.80 -09:18:47.4: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3313 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:03:22.03 -10:46:14.0: 13.90 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:46:44.56 -11:09:27.8: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:03:22.03 -10:46:14.0: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0658 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:18.85 -09:31:12.1: 13.82 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:18.85 -09:31:12.1: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1918 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:59.38 -08:18:33.0: 14.40 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:59.38 -08:18:33.0: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4227 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33470.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34199.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35070.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32126_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 The candidate 32126_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 13.22414    2461326.72414    14.31    00:17:28.34 -10:23:33.0   2201 3426   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.22461    2461326.72461    14.05    00:17:28.29 -10:23:31.6   2207 3427   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32128_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 The candidate 32128_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 13.22414    2461326.72414    14.35    23:55:27.98 -08:53:59.3   5479 2499   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.22461    2461326.72461    14.34    23:55:28.09 -08:53:59.7   5484 2500   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32129_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 The candidate 32129_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 13.22414    2461326.72414    14.27    00:13:02.60 -05:59:51.5   2828 0750   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.22461    2461326.72461    14.27    00:13:02.54 -05:59:52.4   2834 0751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32130_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 The candidate 32130_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 13.22414    2461326.72414    14.08    23:42:48.73 -12:57:58.8   7349 4975   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.22461    2461326.72461    14.13    23:42:48.73 -12:57:58.9   7354 4976   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32841_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 The candidate 32841_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 13.22414    2461326.72414    11.87    00:17:43.35 -11:13:11.9   2171 3929   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.22461    2461326.72461    11.94    00:17:43.36 -11:13:12.1   2177 3930   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33470_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 Preparing report for the candidate 33470_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33983_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 The candidate 33983_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 13.22414    2461326.72414    13.31    23:48:06.67 -07:36:47.9   6584 1722   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.22461    2461326.72461    13.28    23:48:06.69 -07:36:47.7   6590 1723   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34100_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 The candidate 34100_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 13.22414    2461326.72414    13.43    23:52:48.95 -06:31:08.5   5880 1056   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.22461    2461326.72461    13.49    23:52:48.90 -06:31:07.6   5886 1057   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34199_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 Preparing report for the candidate 34199_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34533_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 The candidate 34533_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 13.22414    2461326.72414    13.68    23:44:44.98 -06:55:20.6   7095 1305   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.22461    2461326.72461    13.67    23:44:44.84 -06:55:26.5   7101 1307   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35070_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 Preparing report for the candidate 35070_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35189_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 The candidate 35189_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 13.22414    2461326.72414    14.02    00:00:47.33 -09:01:10.3   4684 2572   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.22461    2461326.72461    14.14    00:00:47.30 -09:01:09.9   4690 2573   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35444_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 The candidate 35444_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 13.22414    2461326.72414    14.08    00:03:22.01 -10:46:13.1   4305 3632   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.22461    2461326.72461    14.05    00:03:22.06 -10:46:14.9   4310 3633   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35529_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 The candidate 35529_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.22461    2461326.72461    14.28    23:50:11.39 -13:49:44.9   6259 5488   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits **** FOUND 23:50:11.41 -13:49:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35601_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 The candidate 35601_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 13.22414    2461326.72414    14.34    23:43:59.42 -08:18:33.1   7201 2148   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.22461    2461326.72461    14.65    23:43:59.35 -08:18:32.9   7207 2149   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35748_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 The candidate 35748_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 13.22414    2461326.72414    14.27    23:56:18.87 -09:31:12.3   5352 2874   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.22461    2461326.72461    14.13    23:56:18.82 -09:31:11.8   5358 2875   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35787_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 The candidate 35787_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 13.22414    2461326.72414    14.31    23:54:09.78 -09:18:47.7   5673 2749   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-22-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 13.22461    2461326.72461    14.35    23:54:09.82 -09:18:47.2   5678 2750   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 08581_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 The candidate 08581_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 13.22461    2461326.72461    12.15    00:11:24.79 -11:28:42.8   3119 4072   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-13_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_012025_TTUQ2b1x1_472017_XBsqcxxf/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-10-13_00-23-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits **** FOUND 00:11:24.81 -11:28:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 19s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 23:55:03.48 -08:51:00.0 00:14:39.44 -09:25:51.1 23:46:44.56 -11:09:27.8 ########### Completed Cet-05-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 23:55:03.48 -08:51:00.0 00:14:39.44 -09:25:51.1 23:46:44.56 -11:09:27.8 ################################################################################### 23:55:03.48 -08:51:00.0 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 00:14:39.44 -09:25:51.1 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 23:46:44.56 -11:09:27.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461326.72414372 -observatory V36 14:44:28.21 -19:00:40.6 Mercury (0.0mag) 14:04:46.99 -20:41:57.7 Venus (-4.4mag) 08:44:09.00 +19:22:55.4 Mars (1.0mag) 09:35:31.70 +14:59:57.8 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:41:55.31 +01:33:38.1 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:11:53.22 +20:57:28.2 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:10:10.06 -00:26:45.3 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:09.92 -23:43:29.0 Pluto (14.5mag) 15:00:06.41 -22:43:09.6 Moon (-8.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Oct 13 01:28 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461326.72414372: 09:35:25.97 +15:00:30.1 Io (6.1mag) 09:35:22.77 +15:00:48.1 Europa (6.2mag) 09:35:40.69 +14:59:08.2 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:35:22.55 +15:00:47.5 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:35:24.48 +15:19:57.3 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:35:32.43 +14:59:54.2 Thebe (16.4mag) 09:34:11.48 +15:22:01.9 Elara (17.5mag) 09:37:51.03 +14:22:54.9 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:34:00.07 +15:27:29.6 Carme (18.8mag) 00:41:41.49 +01:33:33.0 Titan (8.2mag) 00:41:48.35 +01:33:34.8 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:41:28.54 +01:30:52.3 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:41:44.22 +01:33:13.5 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:40:13.86 +01:21:16.7 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 13 01:28 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461326.72414372: 03:01:02.79 +21:15:55.6 JWST 14:30:32.92 +53:22:48.4 Chandra 11:03:36.11 -59:19:33.6 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 13 01:28 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461326.72414372 -observatory V36 03:45:34.66 +20:12:09.5 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:26:22.17 -33:27:11.0 14.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:40:32.19 -72:31:22.5 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:15:38.94 +34:42:14.3 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:55:34.42 +48:27:38.3 17.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 07:30:52.92 +25:26:25.2 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:02:47.36 +35:51:50.7 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:27:11.10 +41:26:47.7 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:46:16.59 -13:36:40.5 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:20:31.73 +15:50:37.2 16.1mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:52:50.42 -02:52:25.0 16.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:50:09.88 +64:28:20.9 15.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:34:03.39 +43:01:12.4 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:47:25.32 +14:26:50.8 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:29:29.30 -28:14:16.0 13.0mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 00:22:27.98 +18:43:15.5 17.6mag 2P/Encke 23:00:19.59 -31:17:16.9 14.6mag 10P/Tempel 02:13:20.09 +38:24:28.4 16.7mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:12:27.62 -08:18:45.1 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:21:15.98 -08:55:22.7 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 07:38:11.76 +15:48:52.5 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 02:58:12.79 +14:15:04.3 17.7mag 88P/Howell 07:45:39.10 +40:45:58.9 17.0mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:06:54.48 +13:29:18.8 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:44:46.88 +12:50:26.9 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 14:11:20.15 -32:44:02.1 17.9mag 124P/Mrkos 06:52:06.15 +19:13:43.7 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 21:24:32.17 +04:53:05.5 9.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:23:03.36 +01:13:16.1 14.4mag 169P/NEAT 03:28:18.16 +04:22:05.3 14.9mag 220P/McNaught 06:06:11.54 +45:37:05.3 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 07:30:16.60 +25:34:13.6 17.9mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.6K Oct 13 01:28 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 05:39:14.97 +51:06:11.70 ASASSN-26fk 2026-10-5.53 -3.9 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 13 01:28 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 13 01:28 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 00:43:31.985 +02:44:37.26 AT 2026addl 2026-09-03.50 20.81 00:20:43.092 +26:18:27.76 AT 2026addk 2026-09-10.40 21.85 02:32:33.449 -04:05:50.65 AT 2026addj 2026-09-19.55 20.69 06:02:06.169 +54:33:49.98 AT 2026addi 2026-09-16.60 20.62 20:31:30.274 -11:28:55.06 AT 2026addh 2026-09-15.24 21.29 21:09:35.309 -38:50:41.60 AT 2026addg 2026-09-03.34 20.53 01:16:25.813 -15:10:04.62 AT 2026addf 2026-08-12.57 21.69 01:17:52.437 -16:01:42.48 AT 2026adde 2026-08-12.57 21.38 23:53:53.849 +06:58:03.97 AT 2026addd 2026-09-14.37 21.08 04:00:29.026 -25:19:51.60 AT 2026addc 2026-09-05.59 21.32 23:51:58.388 +36:11:37.62 AT 2026addb 2026-09-13.38 21.75 02:23:44.130 -38:09:01.15 AT 2026adda 2026-09-16.51 21.09 19:58:50.785 -31:34:29.11 AT 2026adcz 2026-09-04.28 21 02:18:02.958 +22:16:26.48 AT 2026adcy 2026-08-11.56 20.88 08:38:23.323 +70:03:08.09 AT 2026adcx 2026-09-27.96 17.18 17:24:20.450 -17:51:02.90 AT 2026adcw 2026-07-10.70 18.79 05:04:34.365 +59:08:46.08 AT 2026adcv 2026-09-10.48 20.4261 20:26:49.827 -26:30:11.24 AT 2026adcu 2026-08-13.38 20.9 03:37:43.530 -04:27:08.43 AT 2026adct 2026-09-11.59 21.54 21:46:53.026 -19:59:57.30 AT 2026adcs 2026-09-13.33 21.73 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 13 01:28 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 86 C