This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.1194 2461326.6194 13.46 00:09:43.01 +65:42:08.5
118.65322 3.17780 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 432252483696803968 | 00:09:43.05 +65:42:10.0 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=1.912+/-0.031 (Very red!)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 00:09:43.01 +65:42:08.5: 14.59 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 00:09:43.01 +65:42:08.5: 14.45 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.1194* 00 09 43.01 +65 42 08.5 13.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 432252483696803968,2461326.6194,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 432252483696803968 20261013.1194 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.1194 2461326.6194 12.54 00:16:39.14 +65:28:12.5
119.32850 2.84205 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 5.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS 1615431
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.724 r Y 0.213 r 2458345.65840 46.918858600000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 00:16:39.14 +65:28:12.5: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 00:16:39.14 +65:28:12.5: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.1194* 00 16 39.14 +65 28 12.5 12.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 1615431,2461326.6194,12.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 1615431 20261013.1194 12.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.1194 2461326.6194 13.36 00:26:49.61 +65:30:38.8
120.38256 2.76092 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:26:49.61 +65:30:38.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=1.523+/-0.040 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 00:26:49.61 +65:30:38.8: 14.23 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 00:26:49.61 +65:30:38.8: 14.31 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.1194* 00 26 49.61 +65 30 38.8 13.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461326.6194,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261013.1194 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 13.1194 2461326.6194 12.77 00:11:09.38 +64:29:25.4
118.61066 1.95714 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 1612314
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.597 g Y 2.083 g 2458536.20060 333.808176700000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 00:11:09.38 +64:29:25.4: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 00:11:09.38 +64:29:25.4: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 13.1194* 00 11 09.38 +64 29 25.4 12.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 1612314,2461326.6194,12.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 1612314 20261013.1194 12.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.57346308 18.01.2026 01:45:37.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
First image: 2461058.57346308 18.01.2026 01:45:37.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Last image: 2461326.61963094 13.10.2026 02:52:06.113 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22638
Objects passed selection criteria: 22585
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16128.5
Average stars matched: 14747 (91.4344 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 246288 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 13 01:47:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q2: 504 -> 1027, 50.925% > 20%; fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits vs fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q4: 1049 -> 794, 24.309% > 20%; fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits vs fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.57346308 18.01.2026 01:45:37.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
First image: 2461058.57346308 18.01.2026 01:45:37.210 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Last image: 2461326.61963094 13.10.2026 02:52:06.113 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 107
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.11
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 192 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 174517
Objects passed selection criteria: 174085
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 123912
Average stars matched: 112274 (90.6073 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 624300 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Oct 13 01:53:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461326.61911682
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:03.672 +61:59:56.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:58.834 +61:59:51.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:03.672 +61:59:56.01
Second-epoch image center 23:59:58.834 +61:59:51.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0095 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:02.761 +62:00:14.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:03.672 +61:59:56.01
Second-epoch image center 00:00:02.761 +62:00:14.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0054 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:58.834 +61:59:51.87
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:02.761 +62:00:14.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00988 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.108AMyRhyw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dNCi30QWUl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pLdA6ZjoWV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m3EKyzmmXE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 28641 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 341.2219 to 20.0291 deg, Dec +55.3489 to +67.4248 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 341.2219 to 20.0291 deg, Dec 55.3489 to 67.4248 deg
Loaded 27161 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14521 out of 16229 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16229 out of 28641 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.892400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.892400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 28641 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 341.2219 to 20.0291 deg, Dec +55.3489 to +67.4248 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 341.2219 to 20.0291 deg, Dec 55.3489 to 67.4248 deg
Loaded 27161 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14521 out of 16229 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16229 out of 28641 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits (aperture=6.1)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 25312 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 341.2676 to 20.0293 deg, Dec +55.2917 to +67.4241 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 341.2676 to 20.0293 deg, Dec 55.2917 to 67.4241 deg
Loaded 27319 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14222 out of 15755 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15755 out of 25312 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
2.1 pix Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
15.3 mag. Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.108AMyRhyw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3420, bad_region=6443, passed=28641
Got 28641 stars (including 19435 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28641 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.2219 through 0 to 20.0291, gap 20.0291 to 341.2219
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.2219 through 0 to 20.0293, gap 20.0293 to 341.2219
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4927 stars left (next iteration limit 5418)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits N_match=4927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=1370 n_q2=764 n_q3=1811 n_q4=982 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits -region wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.dNCi30QWUl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2943, bad_region=5652, passed=25312
Got 25312 stars (including 17249 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25312 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.2676 through 0 to 20.0293, gap 20.0293 to 341.2676
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.2677 through 0 to 20.0292, gap 20.0292 to 341.2677
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4927 stars left (next iteration limit 5419)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits N_match=4927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.310 n_q1=1391 n_q2=768 n_q3=1793 n_q4=975 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits -region wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pLdA6ZjoWV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=672, bad_region=1725, passed=9796
Got 9796 stars (including 7487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9796 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.5612 through 0 to 19.3454, gap 19.3454 to 340.5612
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.5586 through 0 to 19.3462, gap 19.3462 to 340.5586
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=7.460 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.015 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=6.702 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=0.845 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.236 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.873 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=0.715 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.942 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.833 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4908 robust_rms_before=1.009 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.580 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.715 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.864 worst_region_rms_after=0.942 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.066 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.833
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.864 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.864 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.580 arcsec matched=4908
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.639 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.519 n_q1=1958 n_q2=504 n_q3=1397 n_q4=1049 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.062
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.m3EKyzmmXE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1333, bad_region=1891, passed=16863
Got 16863 stars (including 13769 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16863 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.5868 through 0 to 19.3733, gap 19.3733 to 340.5868
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15348 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.5852 through 0 to 19.3739, gap 19.3739 to 340.5852
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15348 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15348 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 4926 stars left (next iteration limit 5417)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4926 robust_rms=6.295 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.361 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.361 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4926 robust_rms=0.563 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.831 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.831 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4926 robust_rms=0.522 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.790 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.790 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4926 robust_rms_before=0.725 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.523 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.563 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.894 worst_region_rms_after=0.831 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.894 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.831
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.894 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.894 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.523 arcsec matched=4926
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits N_match=4926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.573 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=1830 n_q2=1027 n_q3=1275 n_q4=794 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits sigma_overall=0.326 worst_q_ratio=1.148
ref2=Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits sigma_overall=0.389 worst_q_ratio=1.260
new1=fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits sigma_overall=0.602 worst_q_ratio=1.062
new2=fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits sigma_overall=0.531 worst_q_ratio=1.079
reference average sigma_overall=0.3575 worst_q_ratio=1.204
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q2: 504 -> 1027, 50.925% > 20%; fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits vs fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q4: 1049 -> 794, 24.309% > 20%; fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits vs fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014_astrometric_residuals.png (4927 matched stars from wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010_astrometric_residuals.png (4927 matched stars from wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098_astrometric_residuals.png (4908 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099_astrometric_residuals.png (4926 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 00:10:14.10 +64:40:14.2: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 00:10:14.10 +64:40:14.2: 12.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:10:14.10 +64:40:14.2: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7741 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33299_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 33299_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:36:58.85 +63:08:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33312_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 33312_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:22:55.54 +64:31:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34166_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 34166_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:03.672 +61:59:56.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:58.834 +61:59:51.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:03.672 +61:59:56.01
Second-epoch image center 23:59:58.834 +61:59:51.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0095 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:02.761 +62:00:14.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:03.672 +61:59:56.01
Second-epoch image center 00:00:02.761 +62:00:14.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0054 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:58.834 +61:59:51.87
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:02.761 +62:00:14.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00988 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iqq3VNH3Cm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t47w3Vmd6a
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nfieEPXuRB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b4YRwONlEk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 201281 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 341.2034 to 20.1139 deg, Dec +55.2965 to +67.4311 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 341.2034 to 20.1139 deg, Dec 55.2965 to 67.4311 deg
Loaded 27397 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11012 out of 16937 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16937 out of 201281 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.733000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.733000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.11
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 201281 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 341.2034 to 20.1139 deg, Dec +55.2965 to +67.4311 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 341.2034 to 20.1139 deg, Dec 55.2965 to 67.4311 deg
Loaded 27397 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11012 out of 16937 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16937 out of 201281 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits (aperture=4.5)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 191528 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 341.2030 to 20.1143 deg, Dec +55.2809 to +67.4277 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 341.2030 to 20.1143 deg, Dec 55.2809 to 67.4277 deg
Loaded 27439 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11425 out of 16946 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16946 out of 191528 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 68 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
1.9 pix Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
15.5 mag. Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.iqq3VNH3Cm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=33162, bad_region=33192, passed=201258
Got 201258 stars (including 139218 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 201258 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.2034 through 0 to 20.1139, gap 20.1139 to 341.2034
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 175324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.2034 through 0 to 20.1138, gap 20.1138 to 341.2034
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 175324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 175325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4937 stars left (next iteration limit 5431)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits N_match=4937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.263 n_q1=1352 n_q2=818 n_q3=1816 n_q4=951 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits -region wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.t47w3Vmd6a (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=39, blended=28863, bad_region=30209, passed=191489
Got 191489 stars (including 135637 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 191489 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.2030 through 0 to 20.1143, gap 20.1143 to 341.2030
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.2030 through 0 to 20.1142, gap 20.1142 to 341.2030
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4932 stars left (next iteration limit 5424)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits N_match=4932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=1373 n_q2=808 n_q3=1805 n_q4=946 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits -region wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.nfieEPXuRB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=6188, bad_region=8942, passed=71749
Got 71749 stars (including 57787 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71749 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.5092 through 0 to 19.3738, gap 19.3738 to 340.5092
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64684 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.5073 through 0 to 19.3746, gap 19.3746 to 340.5073
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64683 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64683 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=7.322 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.844 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=7.828 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=0.844 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.253 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.857 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=0.716 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.942 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.817 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4921 robust_rms_before=1.018 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.564 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.716 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.837 worst_region_rms_after=0.942 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.062 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.817
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.837 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.837 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.564 arcsec matched=4921
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.614 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.497 n_q1=1908 n_q2=529 n_q3=1461 n_q4=1023 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.b4YRwONlEk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=13502, bad_region=9307, passed=115518
Got 115518 stars (including 93930 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 115518 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.5082 through 0 to 19.3736, gap 19.3736 to 340.5082
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 108418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.5062 through 0 to 19.3742, gap 19.3742 to 340.5062
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 108418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 108418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4932 stars left (next iteration limit 5425)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4932 robust_rms=6.412 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.899 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.899 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4932 robust_rms=0.556 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.801 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.801 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4932 robust_rms=0.520 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.777 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.777 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4932 robust_rms_before=0.729 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.507 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.556 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.868 worst_region_rms_after=0.801 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.872 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.801
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.868 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.868 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.507 arcsec matched=4932
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits N_match=4932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=1816 n_q2=990 n_q3=1342 n_q4=784 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-51-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0098.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_215626_TTUQ2b1x1_1612407_vk6PXnC9/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 00:07:30.66 +58:11:52.2: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:29:25.16 +60:16:26.6: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:28:27.58 +60:58:01.1: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:27:44.08 +60:35:43.3: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 00:13:22.11 +63:41:07.4: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:26:04.49 +61:05:23.1: 13.85 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:48:43.18 +61:01:53.7: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 23:27:44.08 +60:35:43.3: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 23:26:04.49 +61:05:23.1: 13.85 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 00:07:30.66 +58:11:52.2: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 00:22:21.56 +63:17:34.2: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 23:29:25.16 +60:16:26.6: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 00:13:22.11 +63:41:07.4: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:30:37.03 +64:39:44.8: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 23:28:27.58 +60:58:01.1: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:27:44.08 +60:35:43.3: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0973 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:26:04.49 +61:05:23.1: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5555 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:25.16 +60:16:26.6: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9414 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:07:30.66 +58:11:52.2: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8467 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 23:48:43.18 +61:01:53.7: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:22.11 +63:41:07.4: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5326 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:27.58 +60:58:01.1: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2530 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:43.18 +61:01:53.7: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1060 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 00:22:21.56 +63:17:34.2: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 23:30:37.03 +64:39:44.8: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:21.56 +63:17:34.2: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6944 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:37.03 +64:39:44.8: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2505 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:27:07.82 +61:22:03.2: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:59:12.83 +59:06:23.7: 9.49 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:57:09.21 +61:00:36.9: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 23:27:07.82 +61:22:03.2: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:27:07.82 +61:22:03.2: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2900 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 23:59:12.83 +59:06:23.7: 9.51 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 23:57:09.21 +61:00:36.9: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.50 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:59:12.83 +59:06:23.7: ref_mag=9.50 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9854 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:57:09.21 +61:00:36.9: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9037 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:25:45.93 +60:43:01.6: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 00:09:56.51 +63:39:19.6: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 23:25:45.93 +60:43:01.6: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:45.93 +60:43:01.6: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0569 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 00:06:19.57 +65:36:13.3: 14.80 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:51:53.21 +65:39:30.3: 13.78 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 00:09:56.51 +63:39:19.6: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:25:46.10 +64:41:52.0: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:09:56.51 +63:39:19.6: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4794 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 00:06:19.57 +65:36:13.3: 15.49 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:06:19.57 +65:36:13.3: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6744 delta=1.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 23:25:46.10 +64:41:52.0: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 23:51:53.21 +65:39:30.3: 13.72 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:46.10 +64:41:52.0: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9428 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:51:53.21 +65:39:30.3: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6099 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 00:09:43.01 +65:42:08.5: 14.59 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 00:09:43.01 +65:42:08.5: 14.45 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:09:43.01 +65:42:08.5: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4773 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 00:16:39.14 +65:28:12.5: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 00:04:39.09 +65:04:26.6: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 00:16:39.14 +65:28:12.5: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:16:39.14 +65:28:12.5: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5447 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 00:18:03.13 +63:47:32.9: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 00:04:39.09 +65:04:26.6: 14.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:04:39.09 +65:04:26.6: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6787 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 00:26:49.61 +65:30:38.8: 14.23 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 00:18:03.13 +63:47:32.9: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:03.13 +63:47:32.9: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4392 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 00:26:49.61 +65:30:38.8: 14.31 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:26:49.61 +65:30:38.8: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3553 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 00:11:09.38 +64:29:25.4: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_19-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 00:25:21.12 +64:40:59.3: 14.41 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 00:11:09.38 +64:29:25.4: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:11:09.38 +64:29:25.4: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7958 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-24-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0010.fits at 00:25:21.12 +64:40:59.3: 14.27 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:21.12 +64:40:59.3: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.5100 delta=0.82 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out245477.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out12828.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out14126.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out15705.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30553.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223590_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 223590_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223591_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 223591_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:31:38.05 +59:10:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223596_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 223596_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223597_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 223597_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223600_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 223600_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:58:59.89 +64:52:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223602_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 223602_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:34:24.73 +62:35:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223604_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 223604_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223605_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 223605_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223607_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 223607_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223620_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 223620_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223629_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 223629_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:10:42.54 +63:25:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223636_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 223636_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223643_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 223643_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223647_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 223647_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:06:20.04 +58:23:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223650_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 223650_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:24:24.40 +61:38:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223654_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 223654_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228805_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 228805_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:33:16.09 +62:54:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231035_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 231035_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233997_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 233997_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234816_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 234816_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:31:24.53 +63:20:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236876_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 236876_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:04:01.83 +64:40:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237244_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 237244_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:23:29.64 +65:20:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237334_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 237334_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:27:19.14 +65:35:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237533_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 237533_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:57:31.76 +61:02:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238256_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 238256_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:52:01.84 +65:39:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238943_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 238943_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:36:16.91 +63:24:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239491_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 239491_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:35:14.56 +63:00:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240039_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 240039_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:26:43.82 +64:36:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240383_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 240383_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241182_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 241182_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:55:26.75 +58:05:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243615_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 243615_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:59:26.75 +64:27:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244380_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 244380_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:38:41.80 +61:19:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244664_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 244664_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:58:37.99 +60:40:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245118_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 245118_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245467_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 245467_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:26:14.53 +63:25:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245477_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 245477_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:06:19.57 +65:36:13.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.074 432238675381746304 001.58253978714 +65.60329196720 13.6292 11.4315 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.074#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247663_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 247663_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249013_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 249013_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:22:14.22 +65:07:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249583_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 249583_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249978_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 249978_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:18:51.26 +57:49:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250133_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 250133_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:10:24.92 +60:01:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14126_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 14126_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12151_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 12151_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:22:52.15 +65:40:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188328_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 188328_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:24:11.82 +57:57:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21823_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 21823_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:19:47.17 +64:55:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10740_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 10740_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:33:15.14 +65:33:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27395_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 27395_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:22:55.44 +64:31:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184495_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 184495_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:33:13.52 +58:27:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221032_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 221032_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15705_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 15705_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124371_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 124371_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 215651_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 215651_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:33:54.54 +65:16:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16565_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 16565_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16328_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 16328_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:19:12.87 +65:22:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213631_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 213631_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:26:20.07 +64:02:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212376_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 212376_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36825_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 36825_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:22:38.80 +63:54:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40499_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 40499_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16670_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 16670_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:07:56.12 +65:30:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12828_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 12828_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13866_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 13866_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15927_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 15927_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14515_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 14515_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:19:24.26 +65:30:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46158_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 46158_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:21:50.75 +63:26:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44796_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 44796_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:36:58.79 +63:08:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30553_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 30553_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66236_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 66236_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23430_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099
The candidate 23430_fd_Cas-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_21-52-06_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099 did not pass the final checks