Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.9815,13.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.4815 13.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Leo-06-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-06-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 196815 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 196815 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits_preview.png'
Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits

renamed 'Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits_preview.png'
Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 532.6367
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.1419
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2395.2770
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 606.3486
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2422.3569
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 614.0016
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.49702
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.012
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 18.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-12T06:32:44.1293031' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-12T11:32:44.1293031' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61325.481066308 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-12T11:32:54.0333778' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61325.4811809375 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 173.329907425698 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 13.9997651228289 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.7763888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 83.0177777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.86517397799846 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 33 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29537 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29537 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 77.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 49.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.00032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/d_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits :)
Spent 0.532605 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/d_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 18.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-12T06:33:43.8235881' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-12T11:33:43.8235881' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61325.4817572106 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-12T11:33:53.7233095' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61325.481871794 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 173.329907382573 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 13.9997651553886 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.9844444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 83.1511111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.81428867479596 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 33 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29537 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29537 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 77.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 49.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.00032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/d_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits :)
Spent 0.543214 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/d_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits

fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461325.98118205
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.627 +14:00:05.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
Image size: 945.3'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:16.299 +14:00:42.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.627 +14:00:05.29
Second-epoch image center 11:33:16.299 +14:00:42.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0203 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:13.676 +14:01:22.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.627 +14:00:05.29
Second-epoch image center 11:33:13.676 +14:01:22.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0354 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:33:16.299 +14:00:42.33
Second-epoch second image center 11:33:13.676 +14:01:22.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01547 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dIbNfaSqSz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XXMBmyg0Rk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QZyIM05x5L
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MYc52EpIiL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9312 to 181.4974 deg, Dec +8.4838 to +19.3109 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9312 to 181.4974 deg, Dec 8.4838 to 19.3109 deg
Loaded 3828 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2954 out of 3142 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3142 out of 5845 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.922650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.922650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9312 to 181.4974 deg, Dec +8.4838 to +19.3109 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9312 to 181.4974 deg, Dec 8.4838 to 19.3109 deg
Loaded 3828 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2954 out of 3142 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3142 out of 5845 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 5851 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9318 to 181.4974 deg, Dec +8.5224 to +19.3315 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9318 to 181.4974 deg, Dec 8.5224 to 19.3315 deg
Loaded 3815 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2961 out of 3138 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3138 out of 5851 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.2 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
2.5 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
2.5 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.6 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.dIbNfaSqSz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=451, bad_region=0, passed=5845
Got 5845 stars (including 5387 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4838 stars left (next iteration limit 5321)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4838 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=1256 n_q2=1244 n_q3=1184 n_q4=1154 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.202
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.XXMBmyg0Rk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=436, bad_region=0, passed=5851
Got 5851 stars (including 5411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5851 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4846 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5319)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits N_match=4836 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1261 n_q2=1247 n_q3=1175 n_q4=1153 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.213
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QZyIM05x5L (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=155, bad_region=0, passed=2519
Got 2519 stars (including 2364 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2519 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2289 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2285 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2285 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2288 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2284 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2284 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 2284 stars left (next iteration limit 2513)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2284 robust_rms=9.778 arcsec worst_region_rms=18.864 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=18.864 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2284 robust_rms=0.495 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.759 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.759 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2284 robust_rms=0.384 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.535 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.451 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2284 robust_rms_before=1.633 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.312 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.384 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.419 worst_region_rms_after=0.535 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.838 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.451
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.419 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.419 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.312 arcsec matched=2284
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits N_match=2284 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=681 n_q2=501 n_q3=642 n_q4=460 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.321
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.MYc52EpIiL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=156, bad_region=0, passed=2535
Got 2535 stars (including 2375 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2535 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2300 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2296 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2296 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2296 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2301 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2296 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2296 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 2296 stars left (next iteration limit 2525)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2296 robust_rms=10.041 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.358 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.358 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2296 robust_rms=0.482 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.738 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.738 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2296 robust_rms=0.358 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.476 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.419 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2296 robust_rms_before=1.606 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.307 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.358 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.419 worst_region_rms_after=0.476 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.808 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.419
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.419 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.419 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.307 arcsec matched=2296
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits N_match=2296 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=677 n_q2=508 n_q3=648 n_q4=463 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.405 worst_q_ratio=1.202
ref2=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits sigma_overall=0.414 worst_q_ratio=1.213
new1=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits sigma_overall=0.321 worst_q_ratio=1.321
new2=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits sigma_overall=0.313 worst_q_ratio=1.231
reference average sigma_overall=0.4095 worst_q_ratio=1.2075
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4838 matched stars from wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379_astrometric_residuals.png (4836 matched stars from wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548_astrometric_residuals.png (2284 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549_astrometric_residuals.png (2296 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04578_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549
The candidate 04578_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 12.48187 | 2461325.98187 | 9.38 | 11:23:40.10 +16:51:06.8 | 3317 4822 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits |
**** FOUND 11:23:40.09 +16:51:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.627 +14:00:05.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
Image size: 945.3'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:16.299 +14:00:42.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.627 +14:00:05.29
Second-epoch image center 11:33:16.299 +14:00:42.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0203 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:13.676 +14:01:22.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.627 +14:00:05.29
Second-epoch image center 11:33:13.676 +14:01:22.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0354 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:33:16.299 +14:00:42.33
Second-epoch second image center 11:33:13.676 +14:01:22.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01547 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WFtw8JUr93
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mbUEio8Svv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QfftRDhyWH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dq0Gp7K8Ph
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30089 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9312 to 181.5069 deg, Dec +8.4654 to +19.3311 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9312 to 181.5069 deg, Dec 8.4654 to 19.3311 deg
Loaded 3842 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2861 out of 3168 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3168 out of 30089 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.808900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.808900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.74
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.74
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 30089 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9312 to 181.5069 deg, Dec +8.4654 to +19.3311 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9312 to 181.5069 deg, Dec 8.4654 to 19.3311 deg
Loaded 3842 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2861 out of 3168 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3168 out of 30089 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 30117 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9319 to 181.5116 deg, Dec +8.4745 to +19.3345 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9319 to 181.5116 deg, Dec 8.4745 to 19.3345 deg
Loaded 3841 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2873 out of 3171 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3171 out of 30117 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.1 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
2.5 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
2.5 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.7 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.WFtw8JUr93 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1260, bad_region=10, passed=30074
Got 30074 stars (including 28749 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30074 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4846 stars left (next iteration limit 5330)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4846 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=1271 n_q2=1230 n_q3=1200 n_q4=1145 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.mbUEio8Svv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1200, bad_region=13, passed=30099
Got 30099 stars (including 28834 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30099 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.345 n_q1=1272 n_q2=1225 n_q3=1197 n_q4=1150 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.239
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QfftRDhyWH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=389, bad_region=27, passed=13801
Got 13801 stars (including 13373 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13801 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4808 stars left (next iteration limit 5287)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4808 robust_rms=9.646 arcsec worst_region_rms=19.989 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=19.989 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4808 robust_rms=0.565 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.883 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.883 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4808 robust_rms=0.456 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.640 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.553 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4808 robust_rms_before=1.650 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.387 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.456 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.517 worst_region_rms_after=0.640 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.855 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.553
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.517 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.517 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.387 arcsec matched=4808
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits N_match=4808 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.379 n_q1=1443 n_q2=957 n_q3=1404 n_q4=1004 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.dq0Gp7K8Ph (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=422, bad_region=28, passed=13901
Got 13901 stars (including 13426 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13901 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4803 robust_rms=10.035 arcsec worst_region_rms=20.538 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=20.538 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4803 robust_rms=0.543 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.813 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.813 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4803 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.548 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.513 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4803 robust_rms_before=1.615 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.376 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.428 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.470 worst_region_rms_after=0.548 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.779 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.513
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.470 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.470 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.376 arcsec matched=4803
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=1436 n_q2=970 n_q3=1393 n_q4=1004 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.253
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-32-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0548.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:02:56.14 +13:18:24.8: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:02:56.14 +13:18:24.8: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52502.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52407_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549
The candidate 52407_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 12.48187 | 2461325.98187 | 12.82 | 11:08:39.28 +17:13:19.8 | 1131 4968 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits |
**** FOUND 11:08:39.26 +17:13:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52435_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549
The candidate 52435_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 12.48187 | 2461325.98187 | 12.91 | 11:15:56.28 +12:49:02.2 | 2295 2341 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits |
**** FOUND 11:15:56.26 +12:49:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52502_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549
Preparing report for the candidate 52502_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52540_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549
The candidate 52540_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 12.48187 | 2461325.98187 | 12.80 | 11:56:19.07 +15:43:40.5 | 8073 4468 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits |
**** FOUND 11:56:19.06 +15:43:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52589_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549
The candidate 52589_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 12.48187 | 2461325.98187 | 13.14 | 11:18:56.43 +10:11:23.8 | 2803 0773 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits |
**** FOUND 11:18:56.41 +10:11:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52590_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549
The candidate 52590_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 12.48187 | 2461325.98187 | 12.98 | 11:54:05.84 +18:11:15.8 | 7635 5927 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits |
**** FOUND 11:54:05.87 +18:11:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52655_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549
The candidate 52655_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 12.48187 | 2461325.98187 | 13.02 | 11:38:01.99 +12:59:05.8 | 5526 2616 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits |
**** FOUND 11:38:02.00 +12:59:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52674_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549
The candidate 52674_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 12.48187 | 2461325.98187 | 13.07 | 11:52:39.75 +15:26:06.1 | 7554 4245 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits |
**** FOUND 11:52:39.70 +15:26:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52736_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549
The candidate 52736_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 12.48187 | 2461325.98187 | 13.68 | 11:43:39.64 +10:42:04.5 | 6441 1297 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits |
**** FOUND 11:43:39.56 +10:42:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17507_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549
The candidate 17507_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 12.48187 | 2461325.98187 | 12.16 | 11:09:18.17 +14:37:04.4 | 1278 3391 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits |
**** FOUND 11:09:18.16 +14:37:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26067_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549
The candidate 26067_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 12.48187 | 2461325.98187 | 9.62 | 11:23:40.09 +16:51:06.6 | 3317 4822 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_063428_TTUQ1b1x1_1761369_a0ISHwkx/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_06-33-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0549.fits |
**** FOUND 11:23:40.09 +16:51:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:02:56.14 +13:18:24.8
########### Completed Leo-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
11:02:56.14 +13:18:24.8
###################################################################################
11:02:56.14 +13:18:24.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461325.98118205 -observatory V36
14:41:40.43 -18:44:46.6 Mercury (0.0mag)
14:05:54.49 -20:48:20.9 Venus (-4.5mag)
08:42:26.49 +19:28:37.3 Mars (1.0mag)
09:35:03.54 +15:02:08.5 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:42:07.93 +01:34:57.5 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:11:57.98 +20:57:40.6 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:10:14.34 -00:26:17.7 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:10.23 -23:43:29.6 Pluto (14.5mag)
14:27:40.92 -19:48:43.3 Moon (-8.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Oct 12 06:35 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461325.98118205:
09:35:10.28 +15:01:32.0 Io (6.1mag)
09:35:05.46 +15:01:59.9 Europa (6.2mag)
09:35:19.45 +15:00:40.7 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:34:47.33 +15:03:36.6 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:34:52.96 +15:22:21.1 Himalia (15.6mag)
09:35:06.30 +15:01:54.4 Thebe (16.4mag)
09:33:41.23 +15:24:02.8 Elara (17.5mag)
09:37:25.68 +14:25:02.5 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:33:35.06 +15:29:29.4 Carme (18.8mag)
00:41:53.54 +01:35:00.2 Titan (8.2mag)
00:42:03.40 +01:35:01.4 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:41:39.51 +01:32:10.9 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:41:54.52 +01:34:39.0 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:40:26.85 +01:22:36.9 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 12 06:35 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461325.98118205:
02:55:06.85 +21:18:18.2 JWST
19:23:35.97 -01:26:51.5 Chandra
07:15:35.10 -16:15:42.1 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 12 06:35 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461325.98118205 -observatory V36
03:45:48.64 +20:12:06.0 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:25:41.84 -33:28:14.5 14.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:40:14.93 -72:28:27.0 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:15:44.32 +34:40:56.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
07:30:36.26 +25:26:51.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:02:27.18 +35:47:04.0 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:27:00.44 +41:28:40.3 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:46:14.98 -13:36:11.2 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:19:08.23 +15:54:17.2 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:52:05.32 -02:48:42.0 16.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:47:06.85 +64:46:41.5 15.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:34:53.52 +43:07:49.0 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:46:42.62 +14:22:17.4 17.7mag A/2026 E1
16:29:29.69 -25:20:03.5 13.0mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
00:24:18.78 +18:50:07.6 17.6mag 2P/Encke
22:59:29.13 -31:27:14.7 14.5mag 10P/Tempel
02:12:17.11 +38:32:51.6 16.7mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:11:57.95 -08:15:07.2 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:21:43.73 -08:54:09.6 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:37:13.67 +15:53:40.4 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
02:58:57.81 +14:17:17.1 17.7mag 88P/Howell
07:42:56.32 +40:33:34.4 17.0mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
09:05:11.55 +13:45:22.1 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:43:15.80 +13:00:39.5 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
14:09:27.77 -32:31:31.0 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos
06:51:35.75 +19:15:40.7 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
21:30:25.69 +04:18:52.5 9.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:21:12.67 +01:23:40.2 14.4mag 169P/NEAT
03:28:43.49 +04:27:40.1 14.9mag 220P/McNaught
06:05:06.46 +45:27:30.8 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
07:29:12.48 +25:35:24.5 17.9mag 266P/Christensen
09:57:20.07 +31:33:38.8 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.6K Oct 12 06:35 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
05:39:14.97 +51:06:11.70 ASASSN-26fk 2026-10-5.53 -3.9
02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61
22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56
15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 12 06:35 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag
00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag
01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag
17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 12 06:35 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
21:46:53.026 -19:59:57.30 AT 2026adcs 2026-09-13.33 21.73
20:22:21.646 -34:13:49.37 AT 2026adcr 2026-09-15.29 20.6
17:20:58.025 +25:54:47.93 AT 2026adcq 2026-09-09.27 21.15
21:57:14.767 -25:52:03.64 AT 2026adcp 2026-09-11.36 20.83
01:59:23.036 -12:15:12.79 AT 2026adco 2026-09-13.52 21.88
00:04:14.586 -27:04:09.26 AT 2026adcn 2026-09-05.46 20.92
00:26:16.977 -20:27:06.43 AT 2026adcm 2026-09-12.47 21.4
01:19:14.504 -23:36:20.99 AT 2026adcl 2026-09-05.52 21.07
00:54:28.694 -22:44:28.31 AT 2026adck 2026-09-12.48 21.44
21:06:10.873 -29:03:57.13 AT 2026adcj 2026-09-05.30 20.71
02:00:33.370 -13:42:45.17 AT 2026adci 2026-08-12.58 21.41
20:43:57.171 -36:04:22.88 AT 2026adch 2026-09-03.29 19.72
17:32:01.150 +24:20:15.64 AT 2026adcg 2026-09-03.26 21.31
17:23:12.264 +23:52:40.59 AT 2026adcf 2026-09-09.27 21.02
02:30:54.483 -13:42:32.65 AT 2026adce 2026-09-04.59 21.07
22:11:05.009 -25:24:04.01 AT 2026adcd 2026-09-11.36 21.34
03:47:37.283 -03:50:22.36 AT 2026adcc 2026-09-11.59 20.69
03:48:40.432 -29:38:45.98 AT 2026adcb 2026-09-05.59 21.55
01:35:12.266 -08:52:42.61 AT 2026adca 2026-09-04.52 21.51
01:22:12.983 -11:31:16.91 AT 2026adbz 2026-09-13.51 21.72
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 12 06:35 tns_transients_list.txt