This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3444 2461325.8444 12.07 03:38:51.85 +21:28:27.3
166.98326 -26.73953 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.64 Angelina -1 -0 1 11.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:38:51.85 +21:28:27.3: 15.11 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:38:51.85 +21:28:27.3: 15.62 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3444* 03 38 51.85 +21 28 27.3 12.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8444,12.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3444 12.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3444 2461325.8444 13.79 03:23:31.56 +23:30:10.2
162.46891 -27.45824 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 1.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.830 Petropolitana -0 -0 0 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:31.56 +23:30:10.2: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:31.56 +23:30:10.2: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3444* 03 23 31.56 +23 30 10.2 13.8 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8444,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3444 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3444 2461325.8444 13.95 03:23:20.98 +18:49:33.8
165.80378 -31.12165 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.586 Thekla -1 -1 1 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:20.98 +18:49:33.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:20.98 +18:49:33.8: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3444* 03 23 20.98 +18 49 33.8 13.9 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8444,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3444 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3444 2461325.8444 14.38 03:44:55.18 +23:27:19.9
166.67093 -24.33061 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.859 Bouzareah -0 0 0 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:55.18 +23:27:19.9: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:55.18 +23:27:19.9: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3444* 03 44 55.18 +23 27 19.9 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8444,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3444 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3444 2461325.8444 14.60 03:45:52.54 +24:39:45.2
165.96482 -23.28791 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.228 Agathe -0 -0 0 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:45:52.54 +24:39:45.2: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:45:52.54 +24:39:45.2: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3444* 03 45 52.54 +24 39 45.2 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8444,14.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3444 14.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3444 2461325.8444 14.66 03:34:09.38 +19:35:16.9
167.46656 -28.88192 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 1.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.310 Margarita 0 -0 0 15.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:09.38 +19:35:16.9: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:09.38 +19:35:16.9: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3444* 03 34 09.38 +19 35 16.9 14.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8444,14.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3444 14.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3444 2461325.8444 15.04 03:52:24.56 +18:58:54.3
171.47953 -26.37547 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1576 Fabiola 0 -0 0 15.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:24.56 +18:58:54.3: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:24.56 +18:58:54.3: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3444* 03 52 24.56 +18 58 54.3 15.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8444,15.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3444 15.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461325.84463935 12.10.2026 08:16:06.840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10806
Objects passed selection criteria: 10770
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8637
Average stars matched: 7908.25 (91.5625 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236344 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 12 03:36:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461325.84463935 12.10.2026 08:16:06.840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 283
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.94
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 36 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 67738
Objects passed selection criteria: 67521
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 54909
Average stars matched: 50271 (91.5533 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 283488 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 12 03:37:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461325.84417927
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:32.738 +21:59:56.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:32.738 +21:59:56.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0024 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:32.046 +21:59:56.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:32.046 +21:59:56.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0049 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:32.738 +21:59:56.35
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:32.046 +21:59:56.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00268 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZnELFGo0ll
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qWBBCA5Mnn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PjweFiN7n0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cIh9ECUS6q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.5175 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.5175 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4761 out of 5130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5130 out of 11315 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.ZnELFGo0ll (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=882, bad_region=2358, passed=11324
Got 11324 stars (including 8232 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4928 stars left (next iteration limit 5420)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.233 n_q1=1932 n_q2=884 n_q3=1338 n_q4=774 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qWBBCA5Mnn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=893, bad_region=2356, passed=11315
Got 11315 stars (including 8229 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4927 stars left (next iteration limit 5419)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.244 n_q1=1928 n_q2=891 n_q3=1332 n_q4=776 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.PjweFiN7n0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=715, bad_region=2393, passed=10872
Got 10872 stars (including 7884 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10872 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4927 stars left (next iteration limit 5416)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4927 robust_rms=7.595 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.639 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.639 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4927 robust_rms=0.435 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.011 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.011 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4927 robust_rms=0.313 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.467 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.467 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4927 robust_rms_before=1.186 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.312 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.313 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.502 worst_region_rms_after=0.467 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.039 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.467
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.502 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.502 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.312 arcsec matched=4927
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits N_match=4927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=1367 n_q2=834 n_q3=1474 n_q4=1252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.061
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.cIh9ECUS6q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=713, bad_region=2377, passed=10711
Got 10711 stars (including 7747 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10711 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4928 stars left (next iteration limit 5416)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4928 robust_rms=7.587 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.834 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.834 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4928 robust_rms=0.466 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.907 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.907 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4928 robust_rms=0.360 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.484 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.484 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4928 robust_rms_before=1.215 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.366 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.360 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.502 worst_region_rms_after=0.484 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.049 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.484
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.502 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.502 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.366 arcsec matched=4928
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits N_match=4928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.413 n_q1=1368 n_q2=833 n_q3=1474 n_q4=1253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.062
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.300 worst_q_ratio=1.268
ref2=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.303
new1=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits sigma_overall=0.326 worst_q_ratio=1.061
new2=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits sigma_overall=0.391 worst_q_ratio=1.062
reference average sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.2855
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (4928 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_astrometric_residuals.png (4927 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458_astrometric_residuals.png (4927 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459_astrometric_residuals.png (4928 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:04.51 +21:12:57.3: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:34.47 +19:39:33.7: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:03.93 +22:50:50.4: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:38:51.85 +21:28:27.3: 15.11 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:55.04 +23:27:15.4: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:04.51 +21:12:57.3: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:34.47 +19:39:33.7: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:04.51 +21:12:57.3: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4014 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:03.93 +22:50:50.4: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:55.04 +23:27:15.4: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:34.47 +19:39:33.7: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1280 delta=0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:38:51.85 +21:28:27.3: 15.62 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:03.93 +22:50:50.4: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3676 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:55.04 +23:27:15.4: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4039 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:38:51.85 +21:28:27.3: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.0705 delta=3.18 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21765.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20924_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 20924_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:09.79 +24:29:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21765_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 21765_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21809_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 21809_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22064_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 22064_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22127_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 22127_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22145_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 22145_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22180_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 22180_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:21.06 +18:01:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
03:38:51.85 +21:28:27.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:32.738 +21:59:56.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:32.738 +21:59:56.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0024 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:32.046 +21:59:56.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:32.046 +21:59:56.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0049 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:32.738 +21:59:56.35
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:32.046 +21:59:56.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00268 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HTgEcrGzA2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YeCFrqKlTV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kSWUPyuAXv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yU7rqorSaM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.4774 to +27.2939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.4774 to 27.2939 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4354 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 71179 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.803800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.803800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.94
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.86
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.86
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.4774 to +27.2939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.4774 to 27.2939 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4354 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 71179 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 71492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6157 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4359 out of 5185 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5185 out of 71492 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 199 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.9 mag. Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.7 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.HTgEcrGzA2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4312, bad_region=11991, passed=71162
Got 71162 stars (including 55414 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71162 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4935 stars left (next iteration limit 5428)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.232 n_q1=1851 n_q2=887 n_q3=1408 n_q4=789 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.YeCFrqKlTV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4374, bad_region=12029, passed=71479
Got 71479 stars (including 55644 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71479 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4930 stars left (next iteration limit 5423)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.246 n_q1=1847 n_q2=888 n_q3=1401 n_q4=794 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kSWUPyuAXv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=3491, bad_region=11144, passed=61739
Got 61739 stars (including 47762 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61739 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4927 stars left (next iteration limit 5419)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4927 robust_rms=7.607 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.651 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.651 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4927 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.137 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.137 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4927 robust_rms=0.309 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.475 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.475 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4927 robust_rms_before=1.169 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.305 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.309 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.502 worst_region_rms_after=0.475 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.026 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.475
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.502 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.502 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.305 arcsec matched=4927
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits N_match=4927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=1394 n_q2=867 n_q3=1470 n_q4=1196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.yU7rqorSaM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3591, bad_region=11392, passed=63038
Got 63038 stars (including 48804 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63038 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4928 stars left (next iteration limit 5420)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4928 robust_rms=7.610 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.700 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.700 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4928 robust_rms=0.457 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.953 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.953 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4928 robust_rms=0.353 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.470 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.470 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4928 robust_rms_before=1.196 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.357 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.353 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.486 worst_region_rms_after=0.470 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.050 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.470
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.486 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.486 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.357 arcsec matched=4928
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits N_match=4928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.409 n_q1=1402 n_q2=863 n_q3=1461 n_q4=1202 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.056
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-15-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0458.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_033247_TTUQ2b1x1_139003_9BDGO8kT/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:31:43.93 +25:41:48.2: 14.86 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:09.20 +20:36:20.4: 14.59 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:45.68 +24:39:27.5: 14.48 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:11.39 +19:57:01.0: 14.91 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:00:22.97 +19:51:10.8: 14.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:22:43.57 +26:02:30.2: 14.65 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:25.12 +18:54:49.7: 15.07 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:56.74 +23:39:43.7: 14.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:55.86 +18:01:14.8: 14.80 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:26.52 +22:20:37.0: 14.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:09.20 +20:36:20.4: 14.68 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:45.68 +24:39:27.5: 14.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:11.39 +19:57:01.0: 15.08 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:56.74 +23:39:43.7: 14.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:31:43.93 +25:41:48.2: 14.83 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:55.86 +18:01:14.8: 14.76 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:09.20 +20:36:20.4: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5720 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:45.68 +24:39:27.5: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6976 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:43.93 +25:41:48.2: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.9786 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:56.74 +23:39:43.7: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2383 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:11.39 +19:57:01.0: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.0757 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:55.86 +18:01:14.8: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6745 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:00:22.97 +19:51:10.8: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:25.12 +18:54:49.7: 15.02 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:22:43.57 +26:02:30.2: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:22.97 +19:51:10.8: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3181 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:22:43.57 +26:02:30.2: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7156 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:25.12 +18:54:49.7: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0150 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:26.52 +22:20:37.0: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:26.52 +22:20:37.0: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2955 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:38:50.43 +21:28:48.7: 13.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:38:50.43 +21:28:48.7: 13.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:50.43 +21:28:48.7: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0536 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:55:03.91 +25:06:46.2: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:55:03.91 +25:06:46.2: 13.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:03.91 +25:06:46.2: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1113 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:31.56 +23:30:10.2: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:20.98 +18:49:33.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:31.56 +23:30:10.2: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:52.23 +18:47:15.2: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:20.98 +18:49:33.8: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:52.23 +18:47:15.2: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:52.23 +18:47:15.2: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9868 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:23.85 +19:48:46.3: 14.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:43.14 +25:03:02.1: 14.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:49.23 +25:53:23.6: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:23.85 +19:48:46.3: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:43.14 +25:03:02.1: 14.54 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:23.85 +19:48:46.3: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2526 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:43.14 +25:03:02.1: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2812 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:49.23 +25:53:23.6: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:49.23 +25:53:23.6: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2188 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:55.18 +23:27:19.9: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:55.18 +23:27:19.9: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:45:52.54 +24:39:45.2: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:25:11.66 +19:50:30.2: 14.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:00:30.72 +21:24:06.6: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:57:00.03 +21:54:20.6: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:45:52.54 +24:39:45.2: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:25:11.66 +19:50:30.2: 14.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:11.66 +19:50:30.2: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5321 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:00:30.72 +21:24:06.6: 14.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:30.72 +21:24:06.6: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4479 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:57:00.03 +21:54:20.6: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:00.03 +21:54:20.6: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5247 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:59:32.60 +22:13:09.2: 14.95 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:50:46.00 +26:01:57.7: 14.62 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:59:32.60 +22:13:09.2: 14.90 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:32.60 +22:13:09.2: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6852 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:09.38 +19:35:16.9: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:50:46.00 +26:01:57.7: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:46.00 +26:01:57.7: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7586 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:09.38 +19:35:16.9: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:24.76 +24:46:05.1: 14.98 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:32.68 +19:11:28.5: 15.06 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:24.76 +24:46:05.1: 14.89 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:24.76 +24:46:05.1: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8223 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:32.68 +19:11:28.5: 15.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:32.68 +19:11:28.5: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7919 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:11.15 +23:00:52.5: 14.98 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:08.12 +26:12:32.6: 15.33 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:35:07.69 +20:12:05.3: 15.12 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:11.15 +23:00:52.5: 14.94 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:11.15 +23:00:52.5: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9885 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:08.12 +26:12:32.6: 15.39 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:08.12 +26:12:32.6: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0262 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:43:54.30 +23:21:16.4: 14.93 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:24.56 +18:58:54.3: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:35:07.69 +20:12:05.3: 14.93 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:35:07.69 +20:12:05.3: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9852 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:24.56 +18:58:54.3: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:43:54.30 +23:21:16.4: 15.00 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:54.30 +23:21:16.4: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.9019 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:42.80 +24:57:38.3: 15.25 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:52.97 +20:23:29.4: 15.15 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:42.80 +24:57:38.3: 15.17 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:42.80 +24:57:38.3: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0351 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:31:26.03 +19:40:23.2: 15.18 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:52.97 +20:23:29.4: 15.14 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:52.97 +20:23:29.4: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8816 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:50.84 +20:18:54.4: 15.57 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:31:26.03 +19:40:23.2: 15.22 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:26.03 +19:40:23.2: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1194 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:27:12.79 +19:38:20.6: 15.76 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:50.84 +20:18:54.4: 15.39 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:50.84 +20:18:54.4: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0580 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:27:12.79 +19:38:20.6: 15.42 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.53 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:27:12.79 +19:38:20.6: ref_mag=15.53 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1754 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:22:49.76 +20:33:52.9: 15.67 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:26:59.32 +20:40:13.0: 15.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:22:49.76 +20:33:52.9: 15.56 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.61 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:22:49.76 +20:33:52.9: ref_mag=15.61 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0802 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:54:21.79 +21:06:15.5: 15.31 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:26:59.32 +20:40:13.0: 15.29 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:59.32 +20:40:13.0: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.1863 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:44.46 +19:13:25.2: 15.62 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:54:21.79 +21:06:15.5: 15.03 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:21.79 +21:06:15.5: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0605 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:49.35 +25:11:00.5: 15.26 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:44.46 +19:13:25.2: 15.50 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.56 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:44.46 +19:13:25.2: ref_mag=15.56 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.2102 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:42:43.17 +24:17:30.6: 15.25 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:49.35 +25:11:00.5: 15.47 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:49.35 +25:11:00.5: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0891 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:26:00.02 +21:08:05.3: 15.59 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:42:43.17 +24:17:30.6: 15.17 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:43.17 +24:17:30.6: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0070 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:42.88 +20:46:38.6: 15.28 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:26:00.02 +21:08:05.3: 15.54 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.56 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:00.02 +21:08:05.3: ref_mag=15.56 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1500 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:47:10.72 +26:12:31.1: 15.27 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:42.88 +20:46:38.6: 15.33 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:42.88 +20:46:38.6: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1159 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:47:10.72 +26:12:31.1: 15.43 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:10.72 +26:12:31.1: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.2145 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:43:32.13 +21:35:49.9: 16.14 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:35:16.11 +19:32:19.2: 15.50 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:43:32.13 +21:35:49.9: 15.86 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.96 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:32.13 +21:35:49.9: ref_mag=15.96 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=15.1648 delta=0.80 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:35:16.11 +19:32:19.2: 15.54 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:35:16.11 +19:32:19.2: ref_mag=15.52 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1248 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:45:34.99 +24:25:03.1: 15.17 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:00:10.27 +25:28:38.4: 15.44 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:45:34.99 +24:25:03.1: 15.17 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:34.99 +24:25:03.1: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=15.1176 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:54:33.17 +20:39:01.1: 15.65 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:00:10.27 +25:28:38.4: 15.49 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:10.27 +25:28:38.4: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1002 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:54:33.17 +20:39:01.1: 15.51 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:33.17 +20:39:01.1: ref_mag=15.57 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1998 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90711.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91174.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out93045.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out93737.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94691.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out95939.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86066_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86066_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86079_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86079_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86084_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86084_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86089_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86089_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86090_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86090_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86094_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86094_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86097_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86097_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86100_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86100_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86101_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86101_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86103_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86103_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86104_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86104_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86105_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86105_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86106_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86106_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:07.56 +25:53:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86108_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86108_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:10.85 +21:00:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86110_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86110_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:32:24.01 +20:37:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86113_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86113_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86588_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86588_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:09.80 +24:29:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86599_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86599_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86654_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 86654_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87094_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 87094_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87756_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 87756_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:54.44 +23:50:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88212_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 88212_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:40.53 +18:47:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88251_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 88251_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88299_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 88299_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:07.71 +23:38:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88411_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 88411_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:39:54.76 +25:11:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88417_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 88417_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88478_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 88478_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88486_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 88486_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88949_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 88949_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89026_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89026_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89036_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89036_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89077_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89077_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89267_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89267_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89273_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89273_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89315_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89315_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89376_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89376_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89406_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89406_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:49.82 +23:15:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89407_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89407_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89481_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89481_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:24.16 +22:45:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89560_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89560_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:12.98 +23:36:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89561_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89561_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89651_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89651_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:50.30 +24:29:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89652_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89652_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89716_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89716_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89751_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89751_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89836_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89836_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89876_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89876_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:08.41 +23:20:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89921_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89921_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89945_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89945_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89989_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 89989_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90024_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 90024_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90077_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 90077_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90155_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 90155_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90224_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 90224_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90288_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 90288_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:11.52 +25:53:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90333_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 90333_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90378_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 90378_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90472_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 90472_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90628_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 90628_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90636_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 90636_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90637_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 90637_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90683_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 90683_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90711_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 90711_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90840_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 90840_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90861_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 90861_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90881_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 90881_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90949_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 90949_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91042_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 91042_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91174_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 91174_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91202_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 91202_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91253_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 91253_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91256_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 91256_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91273_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 91273_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91304_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 91304_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:22:37.45 +24:53:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91350_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 91350_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91394_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 91394_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91544_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 91544_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91622_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 91622_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:15.11 +24:34:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91665_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 91665_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:20.72 +24:45:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91669_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 91669_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91690_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 91690_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91872_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 91872_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91904_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 91904_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91926_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 91926_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92096_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92096_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92103_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92103_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92136_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92136_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92161_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92161_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92184_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92184_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92205_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92205_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92236_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92236_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92307_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92307_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92379_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92379_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92404_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92404_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92464_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92464_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92635_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92635_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92692_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92692_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92737_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92737_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92795_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92795_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92824_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92824_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:37.43 +21:56:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92946_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 92946_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93004_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93004_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93031_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93031_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93034_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93034_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93045_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 93045_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93293_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93293_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93312_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93312_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93327_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93327_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93427_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93427_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93525_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93525_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93554_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93554_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93583_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93583_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93602_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93602_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93615_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93615_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93636_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93636_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93644_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93644_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93646_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93646_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93661_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93661_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93737_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 93737_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93811_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93811_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93846_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93846_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93907_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 93907_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94038_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94038_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94042_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94042_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94081_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94081_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94123_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94123_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94145_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94145_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94201_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94201_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94236_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94236_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94399_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94399_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94419_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94419_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94520_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94520_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94530_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94530_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94552_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94552_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94614_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94614_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94623_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94623_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94647_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94647_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94691_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 94691_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94753_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94753_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94931_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94931_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94934_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94934_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94998_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 94998_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95068_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95068_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95093_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95093_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95138_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95138_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95163_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95163_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95295_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95295_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95347_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95347_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95404_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95404_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95444_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95444_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95456_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95456_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95486_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95486_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95514_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95514_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95526_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95526_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95552_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95552_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95608_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95608_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95613_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95613_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95632_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95632_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95678_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95678_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95683_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95683_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95704_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95704_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95723_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95723_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95752_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95752_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95777_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95777_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95875_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95875_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95938_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95938_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95939_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 95939_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95974_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95974_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95982_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 95982_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96009_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96009_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96039_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96039_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96180_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96180_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96305_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96305_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96322_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96322_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96413_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96413_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96539_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96539_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96565_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96565_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96575_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96575_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96588_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96588_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96636_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96636_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96637_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96637_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96672_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96672_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96675_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96675_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96772_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96772_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96775_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96775_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96784_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96784_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96807_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96807_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96814_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96814_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96820_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96820_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96826_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96826_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96834_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96834_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96850_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96850_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96856_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96856_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96913_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96913_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96916_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96916_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96954_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 96954_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97017_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 97017_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43802_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 43802_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:38:51.86 +21:28:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23701_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459
The candidate 23701_fd_Tau-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_03-16-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0459 did not pass the final checks
