This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3524 2461325.8524 12.95 04:08:22.35 +17:45:01.1
175.36142 -24.48529 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato 0 0 0 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:22.35 +17:45:01.1: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:22.35 +17:45:01.1: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3524* 04 08 22.35 +17 45 01.1 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8524,12.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3524 12.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3524 2461325.8524 13.62 03:56:52.29 +15:18:20.2
175.28422 -28.16879 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.443 Photographica -0 -0 0 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:56:52.29 +15:18:20.2: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:56:52.29 +15:18:20.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3524* 03 56 52.29 +15 18 20.2 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8524,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3524 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3524 2461325.8524 13.36 04:52:36.30 +17:03:41.5
183.04800 -16.73032 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.631 Philippina 0 -0 0 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:52:36.30 +17:03:41.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:52:36.30 +17:03:41.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3524* 04 52 36.30 +17 03 41.5 13.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8524,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3524 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3524 2461325.8524 14.04 03:57:08.90 +15:31:52.6
175.14910 -27.96591 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.742 Edisona -0 -1 1 14.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:08.90 +15:31:52.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:08.90 +15:31:52.6: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3524* 03 57 08.90 +15 31 52.6 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8524,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3524 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3524 2461325.8524 14.23 04:28:06.71 +17:33:21.1
178.85191 -21.05076 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1171 Rusthawelia -0 -1 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:06.71 +17:33:21.1: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:06.71 +17:33:21.1: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3524* 04 28 06.71 +17 33 21.1 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8524,14.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3524 14.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3524 2461325.8524 14.40 03:57:25.20 +10:57:26.5
179.09628 -30.98645 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.655 Briseis 0 -1 1 14.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:25.20 +10:57:26.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:25.20 +10:57:26.5: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3524* 03 57 25.20 +10 57 26.5 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8524,14.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3524 14.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3524 2461325.8524 14.32 04:13:33.63 +13:03:28.4
180.19630 -26.62077 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1115 Sabauda 0 -0 0 14.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:13:33.63 +13:03:28.4: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:13:33.63 +13:03:28.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3524* 04 13 33.63 +13 03 28.4 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8524,14.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3524 14.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
First image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Last image: 2461325.85269818 12.10.2026 08:27:43.123 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 20
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9496
Objects passed selection criteria: 9493
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8979.25
Average stars matched: 8732.25 (97.2492 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235848 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 12 03:32:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
First image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Last image: 2461325.85269818 12.10.2026 08:27:43.123 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 104
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.00
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 59160
Objects passed selection criteria: 59040
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 55485.8
Average stars matched: 53738.2 (96.8505 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 277268 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 12 03:33:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461325.85208834
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:27.435 +14:00:55.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:27.435 +14:00:55.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0525 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:27.028 +14:00:14.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:27.028 +14:00:14.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0520 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:26:27.435 +14:00:55.14
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:27.028 +14:00:14.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01138 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tLjw2ZCs4P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.drU4z3X6Wt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GLmGFJqCTd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gBXrMruDz3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.989100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.989100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec +8.6216 to +19.2870 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec 8.6216 to 19.2870 deg
Loaded 4407 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3650 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3650 out of 8488 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 19 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.tLjw2ZCs4P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=728, bad_region=0, passed=9344
Got 9344 stars (including 8597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1309 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1429 n_q4=1041 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.drU4z3X6Wt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=679, bad_region=1, passed=8488
Got 8488 stars (including 7793 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5371)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.242 n_q1=1282 n_q2=1141 n_q3=1405 n_q4=1054 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.472
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.GLmGFJqCTd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=512, bad_region=1, passed=9162
Got 9162 stars (including 8641 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9162 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5363)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=14.044 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.941 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.941 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.445 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.690 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.690 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.280 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.403 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.403 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=1.293 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.298 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.280 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.449 worst_region_rms_after=0.403 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.059 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.403
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:27.493 +14:00:54.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 9162 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4049765.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.293 -> 0.280 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4876 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4711 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4711 pairs (4876 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4711 robust_rms=13.974 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.031 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.031 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4711 robust_rms=0.441 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.675 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.675 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4711 robust_rms=0.279 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.404 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.404 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4711 robust_rms_before=0.279 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.279 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.279 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.404 worst_region_rms_after=0.404 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.404 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.404
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:27.494 +14:00:54.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 9162 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4069227.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.279 -> 0.279 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits N_match=4711 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=1026 n_q2=1353 n_q3=1075 n_q4=1257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.191
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.gBXrMruDz3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=534, bad_region=0, passed=9170
Got 9170 stars (including 8624 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9170 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4879 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=14.122 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.777 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.777 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.465 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.676 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.676 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.294 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.417 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.417 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4879 robust_rms_before=1.313 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.321 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.294 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.454 worst_region_rms_after=0.417 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.073 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.417
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.454 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.454 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.321 arcsec matched=4879
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits N_match=4879 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=1049 n_q2=1382 n_q3=1152 n_q4=1296 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.263
ref2=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.472
new1=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits sigma_overall=0.297 worst_q_ratio=1.191
new2=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits sigma_overall=0.332 worst_q_ratio=1.148
reference average sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.3675
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151_astrometric_residuals.png (4881 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147_astrometric_residuals.png (4882 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434_astrometric_residuals.png (4711 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435_astrometric_residuals.png (4879 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:36:31.61 +16:29:05.4: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:30:23.48 +14:15:26.3: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:30:18.47 +14:35:00.2: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:27:31.09 +15:35:14.7: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:27:51.59 +10:00:51.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:33:50.12 +13:06:46.0: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:25:35.68 +15:49:48.3: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:37:10.37 +12:12:47.3: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:27:11.70 +13:18:27.1: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:29:57.83 +15:19:04.8: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:36:31.61 +16:29:05.4: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:30:18.47 +14:35:00.2: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:27:31.09 +15:35:14.7: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:31.61 +16:29:05.4: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3567 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:30:23.48 +14:15:26.3: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:25:35.68 +15:49:48.3: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:18.47 +14:35:00.2: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4370 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:33:50.12 +13:06:46.0: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:31.09 +15:35:14.7: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2004 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:27:51.59 +10:00:51.1: 9.90 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:51.59 +10:00:51.1: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:23.48 +14:15:26.3: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4626 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:50.12 +13:06:46.0: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4604 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:35.68 +15:49:48.3: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4744 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:37:10.37 +12:12:47.3: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:10.37 +12:12:47.3: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3495 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:27:11.70 +13:18:27.1: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:11.70 +13:18:27.1: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2443 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:29:57.83 +15:19:04.8: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:57.83 +15:19:04.8: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3776 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:19:17.47 +11:38:51.2: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:36:34.76 +16:34:00.0: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:29:31.45 +13:55:48.3: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:57.46 +14:22:48.8: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:37:42.10 +15:09:37.6: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:36:34.76 +16:34:00.0: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:19:17.47 +11:38:51.2: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:34.76 +16:34:00.0: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4998 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:29:31.45 +13:55:48.3: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:17.47 +11:38:51.2: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5006 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:31.45 +13:55:48.3: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4874 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:37:42.10 +15:09:37.6: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:57.46 +14:22:48.8: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:42.10 +15:09:37.6: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5062 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:57.46 +14:22:48.8: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4924 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20180_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20180_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20374_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20374_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20379_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20379_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20395_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20395_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20404_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20404_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20405_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20405_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20422_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20422_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20428_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20428_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20431_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20431_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20432_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20432_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20433_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20433_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20435_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20435_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20436_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20436_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20437_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20437_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20438_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20438_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:27.21 +16:33:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04086_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 04086_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.99 +14:32:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08081_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 08081_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.71 +09:56:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01595_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 01595_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.28 +17:32:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:27.494 +14:00:54.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:27.494 +14:00:54.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0522 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:26:27.028 +14:00:14.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72
Second-epoch image center 04:26:27.028 +14:00:14.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0520 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:26:27.494 +14:00:54.04
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:27.028 +14:00:14.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01112 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PhmjiqZz5b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JwjjWr5SGc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kHslTWtfiW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits &> /tmp/tmp.flc6tSoRo4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.852800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.852800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.00
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.85
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.85
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg
Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 58309 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec +8.6064 to +19.2869 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec 8.6064 to 19.2869 deg
Loaded 4433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3131 out of 3673 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3673 out of 58309 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 90 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
1.8 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PhmjiqZz5b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3506, bad_region=5, passed=62251
Got 62251 stars (including 58597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62251 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1302 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1432 n_q4=1060 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JwjjWr5SGc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3080, bad_region=5, passed=58299
Got 58299 stars (including 55093 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58299 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.235 n_q1=1266 n_q2=1129 n_q3=1416 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.486
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kHslTWtfiW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=2327, bad_region=47, passed=51416
Got 51416 stars (including 48966 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51416 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=14.161 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.422 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.422 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.451 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.677 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.677 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.279 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.404 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.404 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4873 robust_rms_before=0.279 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.286 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.279 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.406 worst_region_rms_after=0.404 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.406 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.404
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.406 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.406 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.279 arcsec matched=4873
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=1072 n_q2=1384 n_q3=1131 n_q4=1286 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.200
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.flc6tSoRo4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2386, bad_region=47, passed=51622
Got 51622 stars (including 49100 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51622 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4870 stars left (next iteration limit 5357)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=14.234 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.696 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.696 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.468 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.668 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.668 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.290 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.412 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.412 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4870 robust_rms_before=1.296 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.304 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.290 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.451 worst_region_rms_after=0.412 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.057 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.412
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.451 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.451 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.304 arcsec matched=4870
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits N_match=4870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=1071 n_q2=1369 n_q3=1140 n_q4=1290 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-26-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_032958_TTUQ1b1x1_3983742_aeR7xYOZ/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:59:34.90 +17:59:15.4: 14.92 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:11.01 +10:38:42.4: 14.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:47:48.89 +14:58:15.8: 15.12 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:14:21.47 +11:48:37.8: 15.19 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:14:25.14 +16:29:25.4: 14.81 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:22:30.69 +15:13:13.0: 14.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:25:58.29 +11:02:38.8: 14.35 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:20:39.23 +14:38:37.3: 15.04 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:18:14.95 +11:50:20.7: 14.68 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:37.88 +13:31:18.0: 14.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:59:34.90 +17:59:15.4: 14.76 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:18:14.95 +11:50:20.7: 14.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:14:21.47 +11:48:37.8: 15.21 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:47:48.89 +14:58:15.8: 14.95 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:11.01 +10:38:42.4: 14.31 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:25:58.29 +11:02:38.8: 14.44 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:14:25.14 +16:29:25.4: 15.09 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:34.90 +17:59:15.4: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9840 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:14.95 +11:50:20.7: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7624 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:20:39.23 +14:38:37.3: 14.97 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:48.89 +14:58:15.8: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8928 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:21.47 +11:48:37.8: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8998 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:22:30.69 +15:13:13.0: 13.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:11.01 +10:38:42.4: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2251 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:25.14 +16:29:25.4: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8665 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:58.29 +11:02:38.8: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6531 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:39.23 +14:38:37.3: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7288 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:30.69 +15:13:13.0: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2386 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:37.88 +13:31:18.0: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:37.88 +13:31:18.0: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1757 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:22.35 +17:45:01.1: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:44.59 +12:30:33.9: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:34:36.37 +16:38:48.5: 14.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:19:30.78 +11:59:01.8: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:38.71 +11:19:31.9: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:56:52.29 +15:18:20.2: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:52:36.30 +17:03:41.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:21:31.42 +14:25:58.5: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:35.52 +17:25:29.0: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:51:49.04 +13:37:43.6: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:22.35 +17:45:01.1: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:44.59 +12:30:33.9: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:34:36.37 +16:38:48.5: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:44.59 +12:30:33.9: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8630 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:38.71 +11:19:31.9: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:36.37 +16:38:48.5: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9520 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:19:30.78 +11:59:01.8: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:38.71 +11:19:31.9: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9129 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:30.78 +11:59:01.8: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8092 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:56:52.29 +15:18:20.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:52:36.30 +17:03:41.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:21:31.42 +14:25:58.5: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:31.42 +14:25:58.5: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8738 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:35.52 +17:25:29.0: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:35.52 +17:25:29.0: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5523 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:51:49.04 +13:37:43.6: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:49.04 +13:37:43.6: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8456 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:25:38.48 +17:55:21.0: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:08.90 +15:31:52.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:28.46 +18:01:07.4: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:55:02.36 +14:08:55.5: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:25:38.48 +17:55:21.0: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:06.71 +17:33:21.1: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:38.48 +17:55:21.0: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0630 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:28.46 +18:01:07.4: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:08.90 +15:31:52.6: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:28.46 +18:01:07.4: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0695 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:25.20 +10:57:26.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:48:30.77 +10:59:01.0: 14.02 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:55:02.36 +14:08:55.5: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:02.36 +14:08:55.5: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1573 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:06.71 +17:33:21.1: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:25.20 +10:57:26.5: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:48:30.77 +10:59:01.0: 14.06 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:30.77 +10:59:01.0: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0929 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:13:33.63 +13:03:28.4: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:32:52.17 +18:55:03.0: 14.33 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:13:33.63 +13:03:28.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:32:52.17 +18:55:03.0: 14.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:52.17 +18:55:03.0: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5010 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:40:59.11 +18:07:09.2: 14.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:55:45.27 +18:16:04.1: 14.89 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:40:59.11 +18:07:09.2: 14.53 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:59.11 +18:07:09.2: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5079 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:55:45.27 +18:16:04.1: 14.66 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:45.27 +18:16:04.1: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5920 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:55.53 +14:05:11.0: 14.46 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:55.53 +14:05:11.0: 14.42 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:55.53 +14:05:11.0: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4784 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:35.34 +16:21:57.1: 14.63 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:21:17.92 +13:40:48.7: 14.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:21:17.92 +13:40:48.7: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:17.92 +13:40:48.7: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5585 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:35.34 +16:21:57.1: 14.49 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:35.34 +16:21:57.1: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6543 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:11.89 +13:22:58.9: 15.01 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:11.89 +13:22:58.9: 15.24 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:11.89 +13:22:58.9: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8283 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:31:17.72 +17:39:39.0: 14.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:56:55.34 +17:46:05.1: 15.64 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:31:17.72 +17:39:39.0: 14.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:17.72 +17:39:39.0: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7665 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:56:55.34 +17:46:05.1: 15.30 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.45 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:55.34 +17:46:05.1: ref_mag=15.45 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8074 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:55:36.63 +16:08:14.4: 15.08 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:43.33 +17:33:26.8: 15.12 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:55:36.63 +16:08:14.4: 15.26 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:36.63 +16:08:14.4: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8424 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:55:44.40 +11:45:45.2: 15.21 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:43.33 +17:33:26.8: 15.35 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:43.33 +17:33:26.8: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9363 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:55:44.40 +11:45:45.2: 15.20 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:44.40 +11:45:45.2: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9780 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:00:19.72 +14:53:07.6: 15.09 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:25:42.96 +17:53:38.8: 15.03 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:00:19.72 +14:53:07.6: 15.02 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:19.72 +14:53:07.6: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0136 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:23:37.94 +17:02:40.6: 14.68 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:25:42.96 +17:53:38.8: 15.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:42.96 +17:53:38.8: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9909 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:23:37.94 +17:02:40.6: 14.65 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:37.94 +17:02:40.6: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7335 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:40:46.98 +18:19:08.9: 15.36 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:09:44.07 +11:44:39.1: 15.20 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:40:46.98 +18:19:08.9: 15.05 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:46.98 +18:19:08.9: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8678 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:50.86 +12:09:13.2: 15.46 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:09:44.07 +11:44:39.1: 15.51 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:44.07 +11:44:39.1: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0230 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:50.86 +12:09:13.2: 15.61 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:50.86 +12:09:13.2: ref_mag=15.52 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.1459 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:45.19 +13:44:02.1: 15.62 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:40.34 +13:23:13.5: 15.41 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:59:54.48 +18:22:21.7: 15.45 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:45.19 +13:44:02.1: 15.19 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:45.19 +13:44:02.1: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1013 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:56:46.51 +13:27:32.2: 15.49 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:40.34 +13:23:13.5: 15.70 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.49 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:40.34 +13:23:13.5: ref_mag=15.49 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.1052 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:59:54.48 +18:22:21.7: 14.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:54.48 +18:22:21.7: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0279 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:56:03.69 +18:46:28.2: 15.18 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:54:45.11 +13:53:12.8: 15.30 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:56:46.51 +13:27:32.2: 15.42 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:46.51 +13:27:32.2: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.0175 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:39:13.58 +10:53:24.9: 14.95 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:56:03.69 +18:46:28.2: 15.22 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:03.69 +18:46:28.2: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1597 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:54:45.11 +13:53:12.8: 15.04 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:45.11 +13:53:12.8: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0994 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:16.09 +18:37:08.9: 15.29 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:39:13.58 +10:53:24.9: 15.03 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:13.58 +10:53:24.9: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0101 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:58:19.25 +13:08:00.3: 15.41 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:07:25.77 +15:30:42.1: 15.08 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:16.09 +18:37:08.9: 15.72 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:16.09 +18:37:08.9: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0774 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:58:19.25 +13:08:00.3: 15.09 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:19.25 +13:08:00.3: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0336 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:07:25.23 +13:33:10.9: 15.22 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:09.02 +13:22:49.2: 15.28 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:36.66 +10:00:27.0: 15.29 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:07:25.77 +15:30:42.1: 15.28 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:25.77 +15:30:42.1: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0847 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:49.75 +10:32:25.2: 15.01 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:07:25.23 +13:33:10.9: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:25.23 +13:33:10.9: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0956 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:57:46.20 +13:12:17.0: 15.10 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:09.02 +13:22:49.2: 14.99 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:09.02 +13:22:49.2: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0646 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:36.66 +10:00:27.0: 15.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:36.66 +10:00:27.0: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0113 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:06:17.85 +13:13:29.1: 15.18 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:08:42.50 +16:50:34.2: 15.43 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 03:59:08.05 +15:18:05.4: 15.44 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:49.75 +10:32:25.2: 15.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:49.75 +10:32:25.2: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0396 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:57:46.20 +13:12:17.0: 14.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:46.20 +13:12:17.0: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9761 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:25.97 +14:22:40.2: 15.58 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:04:59.21 +11:16:27.7: 15.54 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:06:17.85 +13:13:29.1: 15.30 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:17.85 +13:13:29.1: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0992 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:08:42.50 +16:50:34.2: 15.34 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:42.50 +16:50:34.2: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.2031 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:31:02.80 +17:51:23.3: 15.42 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 03:59:08.05 +15:18:05.4: 15.33 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:08.05 +15:18:05.4: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0721 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:13:30.13 +14:22:28.3: 15.41 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:15:54.93 +14:09:52.4: 14.99 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:25.97 +14:22:40.2: 15.20 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:25.97 +14:22:40.2: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0760 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:04:59.21 +11:16:27.7: 15.30 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:59.21 +11:16:27.7: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1609 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:13:15.52 +15:32:25.3: 15.49 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:31:02.80 +17:51:23.3: 15.11 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:02.80 +17:51:23.3: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1187 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:53.28 +15:55:45.2: 15.11 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:13:30.13 +14:22:28.3: 15.35 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:13:30.13 +14:22:28.3: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0942 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:15:54.93 +14:09:52.4: 15.39 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:54.93 +14:09:52.4: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.1698 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:52:34.59 +18:19:42.4: 15.55 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:09:51.79 +09:38:57.3: 15.38 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:13:15.52 +15:32:25.3: 15.69 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:14:22.57 +12:16:47.6: 15.48 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.55 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:13:15.52 +15:32:25.3: ref_mag=15.55 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.2336 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:28:29.53 +17:56:07.1: 15.29 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:53.28 +15:55:45.2: 15.10 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:53.28 +15:55:45.2: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0947 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:47:56.02 +17:02:16.9: 15.26 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:52:34.59 +18:19:42.4: 15.14 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:34.59 +18:19:42.4: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1145 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:09:51.79 +09:38:57.3: 15.35 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:51.79 +09:38:57.3: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1539 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:56:26.62 +18:09:47.8: 15.37 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:14:22.57 +12:16:47.6: 15.33 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:22.57 +12:16:47.6: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0579 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:28:29.53 +17:56:07.1: 15.39 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:29.53 +17:56:07.1: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0749 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:47:56.02 +17:02:16.9: 15.29 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:56.02 +17:02:16.9: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1216 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:56:26.62 +18:09:47.8: 15.58 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.45 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:56:26.62 +18:09:47.8: ref_mag=15.45 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8946 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76052.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76278.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76295.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76593.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76836.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76851.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76889.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75644_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 75644_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75646_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 75646_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75650_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 75650_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75652_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 75652_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75654_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 75654_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75655_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 75655_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75660_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 75660_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75667_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 75667_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75668_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 75668_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75670_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 75670_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75672_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 75672_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75673_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 75673_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75678_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 75678_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75680_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 75680_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76013_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 76013_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76025_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 76025_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:47.87 +18:26:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76052_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 76052_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76184_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 76184_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:42.00 +10:53:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76197_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 76197_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:59.66 +14:06:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76278_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 76278_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76295_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 76295_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76323_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 76323_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76470_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 76470_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76498_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 76498_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76515_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 76515_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76569_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 76569_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76593_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 76593_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76600_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 76600_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:17.73 +17:30:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76677_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 76677_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:34.29 +17:20:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76684_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 76684_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:09.98 +08:58:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76793_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 76793_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76836_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 76836_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76851_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 76851_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76866_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 76866_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76889_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 76889_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76994_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 76994_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77071_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77071_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:04.73 +17:34:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77075_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77075_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77092_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77092_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77113_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77113_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77116_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77116_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77145_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77145_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77187_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77187_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77211_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77211_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77220_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77220_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77222_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77222_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77242_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77242_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77301_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77301_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77326_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77326_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77362_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77362_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77365_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77365_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77373_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77373_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77378_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77378_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77386_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77386_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77390_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77390_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77394_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77394_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77404_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77404_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77414_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77414_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77420_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77420_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77430_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77430_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77452_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77452_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77453_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77453_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77455_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77455_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77463_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77463_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77468_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77468_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77472_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77472_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77473_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77473_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77499_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77499_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77502_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77502_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77509_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77509_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77512_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77512_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77536_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77536_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77547_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77547_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77554_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77554_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77560_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77560_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77572_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77572_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77588_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77588_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77597_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77597_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77620_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77620_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77623_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77623_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77646_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77646_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77649_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77649_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77651_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77651_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77710_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77710_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77743_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 77743_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46186_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 46186_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.70 +09:56:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03602_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 03602_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:44.42 +18:37:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20512_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20512_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15098_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 15098_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-27-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
