This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3422* 04 11 57.77 +20 57 39.6 7.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8422,7.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3422 7.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3422 2461325.8422 12.09 03:38:51.94 +21:28:26.7
166.98367 -26.73943 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.64 Angelina -1 -1 1 11.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:38:51.94 +21:28:26.7: 15.19 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:38:51.94 +21:28:26.7: 15.76 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.12
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3422* 03 38 51.94 +21 28 26.7 12.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8422,12.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3422 12.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3422* 04 11 57.76 +20 57 39.8 7.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8422,7.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3422 7.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3422 2461325.8422 12.80 04:08:22.50 +17:45:00.6
175.36197 -24.48495 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato 1 -1 1 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:08:22.50 +17:45:00.6: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:08:22.50 +17:45:00.6: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3422* 04 08 22.50 +17 45 00.6 12.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8422,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3422 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3422 2461325.8422 12.92 04:09:45.32 +23:39:02.3
170.93446 -20.22288 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.83 Beatrix 0 -0 1 13.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:09:45.32 +23:39:02.3: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:09:45.32 +23:39:02.3: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3422* 04 09 45.32 +23 39 02.3 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8422,12.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3422 12.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3422 2461325.8422 13.82 03:23:31.63 +23:30:10.2
162.46914 -27.45807 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.830 Petropolitana -0 -0 0 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:31.63 +23:30:10.2: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:31.63 +23:30:10.2: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3422* 03 23 31.63 +23 30 10.2 13.8 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8422,13.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3422 13.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3422 2461325.8422 13.88 03:23:21.07 +18:49:33.5
165.80416 -31.12149 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.586 Thekla -0 -1 1 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:21.07 +18:49:33.5: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:21.07 +18:49:33.5: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3422* 03 23 21.07 +18 49 33.5 13.9 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8422,13.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3422 13.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3422 2461325.8422 13.99 04:13:14.71 +23:30:05.4
171.63510 -19.74527 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.162 Laurentia -0 0 0 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:13:14.71 +23:30:05.4: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:13:14.71 +23:30:05.4: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3422* 04 13 14.71 +23 30 05.4 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8422,13.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3422 13.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3422 2461325.8422 14.23 03:11:56.04 +22:03:45.3
161.03593 -30.22185 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.640 Brambilla 0 -1 1 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:11:56.04 +22:03:45.3: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:11:56.04 +22:03:45.3: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3422* 03 11 56.04 +22 03 45.3 14.2 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8422,14.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3422 14.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3422 2461325.8422 14.40 03:44:55.28 +23:27:19.5
166.67133 -24.33043 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.859 Bouzareah 0 0 0 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:55.28 +23:27:19.5: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:55.28 +23:27:19.5: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3422* 03 44 55.28 +23 27 19.5 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8422,14.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3422 14.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3422 2461325.8422 14.55 03:12:34.18 +17:21:41.2
164.53678 -33.87220 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1424 Sundmania 1 -0 1 14.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:12:34.18 +17:21:41.2: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:12:34.18 +17:21:41.2: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3422* 03 12 34.18 +17 21 41.2 14.6 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8422,14.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3422 14.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3422 2461325.8422 14.68 03:45:52.60 +24:39:45.4
165.96497 -23.28771 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.228 Agathe -0 0 0 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:45:52.60 +24:39:45.4: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:45:52.60 +24:39:45.4: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3422* 03 45 52.60 +24 39 45.4 14.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8422,14.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3422 14.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.3422 2461325.8422 15.01 03:34:09.37 +19:35:16.2
167.46667 -28.88209 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.310 Margarita -1 -1 1 15.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:09.37 +19:35:16.2: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:09.37 +19:35:16.2: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.3422* 03 34 09.37 +19 35 16.2 15.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.8422,15.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.3422 15.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461325.84265557 12.10.2026 08:13:15.441 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 21
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11862
Objects passed selection criteria: 11856
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11367.5
Average stars matched: 10988.8 (96.6681 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 237032 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 12 03:16:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461325.84265557 12.10.2026 08:13:15.441 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 136
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.97
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 46 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 70430
Objects passed selection criteria: 70276
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 67193
Average stars matched: 64744 (96.3553 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 522404 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 12 03:18:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461325.84183176
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:13.448 +21:59:43.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:13.448 +21:59:43.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0766 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:16.725 +22:00:12.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:16.725 +22:00:12.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0642 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:13.448 +21:59:43.49
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:16.725 +22:00:12.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01497 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lZnilf4Oux
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rrOcownXyW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sEO8UMuoTH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C4ntNQ7sg0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.5175 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.5175 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4761 out of 5130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5130 out of 11315 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 20 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.lZnilf4Oux (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=882, bad_region=0, passed=11324
Got 11324 stars (including 10422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1548 n_q2=1222 n_q3=1071 n_q4=1082 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.rrOcownXyW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=893, bad_region=0, passed=11315
Got 11315 stars (including 10408 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=1546 n_q2=1221 n_q3=1073 n_q4=1081 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.338
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.sEO8UMuoTH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=710, bad_region=0, passed=11545
Got 11545 stars (including 10827 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11545 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4920 stars left (next iteration limit 5410)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=12.165 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.155 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.155 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=0.406 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.099 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.099 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=0.275 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.388 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.388 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4920 robust_rms_before=1.358 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.298 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.275 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.454 worst_region_rms_after=0.388 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.102 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.388
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:13.476 +21:59:42.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11545 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2424418.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.358 -> 0.275 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4920 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4745 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4745 pairs (4920 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4745 robust_rms=12.099 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.738 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.738 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4745 robust_rms=0.405 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.043 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.043 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4745 robust_rms=0.273 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.381 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.381 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4745 robust_rms_before=0.274 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.274 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.273 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.379 worst_region_rms_after=0.381 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.379 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.381
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.381 vs 0.379 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4745 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits N_match=4745 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.282 n_q1=1072 n_q2=1002 n_q3=1198 n_q4=1473 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.198
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.C4ntNQ7sg0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=711, bad_region=0, passed=11525
Got 11525 stars (including 10803 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11525 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5412)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=12.172 arcsec worst_region_rms=31.049 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=31.049 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=0.398 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.086 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.086 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4921 robust_rms=0.275 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.387 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.387 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4921 robust_rms_before=1.324 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.297 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.275 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.440 worst_region_rms_after=0.387 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.106 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.387
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:16.754 +22:00:10.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11525 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2424215.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.324 -> 0.275 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4921 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4741 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4741 pairs (4921 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4741 robust_rms=12.132 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.554 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.554 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4741 robust_rms=0.397 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.042 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.042 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4741 robust_rms=0.274 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.384 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.384 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4741 robust_rms_before=0.273 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.273 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.274 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.382 worst_region_rms_after=0.384 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.382 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.384
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.384 vs 0.382 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4741 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits N_match=4741 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.279 n_q1=1065 n_q2=1008 n_q3=1203 n_q4=1465 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.191
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.278
ref2=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.338
new1=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.198
new2=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.191
reference average sigma_overall=0.3005 worst_q_ratio=1.308
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (4923 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_astrometric_residuals.png (4921 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418_astrometric_residuals.png (4745 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419_astrometric_residuals.png (4741 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-12-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_031358_TTUQ1b1x1_2242640_QRq88tEW/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:38:51.94 +21:28:26.7: 15.19 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:30:27.96 +20:05:27.8: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:03.93 +22:50:50.1: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:55.05 +23:27:15.9: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:43.03 +22:39:49.3: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:38:30.05 +21:36:41.1: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:02.83 +21:42:45.1: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:42:54.01 +22:37:07.5: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:30:27.96 +20:05:27.8: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:38:51.94 +21:28:26.7: 15.76 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:03.93 +22:50:50.1: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:04.53 +21:12:57.4: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:27.96 +20:05:27.8: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3308 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:38:51.94 +21:28:26.7: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=12.0843 delta=3.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:03.93 +22:50:50.1: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3434 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:55.05 +23:27:15.9: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:55.05 +23:27:15.9: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4276 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:38:30.05 +21:36:41.1: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:42:54.01 +22:37:07.5: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:30.05 +21:36:41.1: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4839 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:54.01 +22:37:07.5: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4678 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:02.83 +21:42:45.1: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:02.83 +21:42:45.1: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4570 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:04.53 +21:12:57.4: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:04.53 +21:12:57.4: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3959 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:43.03 +22:39:49.3: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:43.03 +22:39:49.3: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4349 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:52.52 +20:55:02.1: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:46:20.43 +20:11:23.4: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:03.39 +21:54:05.3: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:52.52 +20:55:02.1: 12.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:52.52 +20:55:02.1: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4930 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:03.39 +21:54:05.3: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:03.39 +21:54:05.3: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4777 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:46:20.43 +20:11:23.4: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:20.43 +20:11:23.4: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4826 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20713.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20582_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 20582_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20631_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20631_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:09.80 +24:29:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20651_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20651_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.60 +24:42:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20711_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20711_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:34.51 +19:39:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20713_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 20713_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20729_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20729_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:04.94 +25:42:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20732_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20732_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:00.83 +21:22:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20738_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20738_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20749_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20749_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20750_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20750_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:21.07 +18:01:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20758_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20758_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20762_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20762_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20764_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20764_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20765_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20765_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20770_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20770_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20771_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20771_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20773_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20773_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:40.86 +23:09:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20775_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20775_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20777_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20777_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20779_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20779_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86947_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86947_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86956_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86956_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86957_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86957_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86963_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86963_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86964_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86964_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86966_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86966_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86970_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86970_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86973_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86973_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86979_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86979_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86983_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86983_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86991_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86991_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86992_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86992_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:16:54.64 +18:15:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86993_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86993_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:15:57.79 +18:58:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86995_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86995_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87000_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 87000_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87071_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87071_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.60 +24:42:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87094_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87094_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:23.18 +24:32:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87137_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87137_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:38:51.93 +21:28:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87176_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87176_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87236_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87236_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87258_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87258_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87279_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 87279_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87302_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 87302_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87341_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87341_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:42.95 +18:12:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87390_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87390_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87391_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87391_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87395_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87395_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:22.93 +26:10:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87401_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87401_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87411_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87411_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87425_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87425_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:12.56 +26:35:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87454_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87454_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:08.40 +23:20:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87465_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87465_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:23.80 +18:13:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87476_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87476_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87501_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87501_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:42.11 +26:21:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87560_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87560_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87586_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 87586_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87607_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87607_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:20.74 +24:45:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87617_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 87617_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87622_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87622_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87738_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 87738_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87741_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87741_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:52.22 +18:47:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87755_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87755_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87757_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87757_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87818_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 87818_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87821_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87821_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87845_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87845_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87848_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87848_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87879_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87879_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87898_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87898_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87916_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87916_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87977_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87977_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87995_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87995_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:18.19 +26:26:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88028_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88028_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:16:04.48 +21:57:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88048_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 88048_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88059_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88059_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88070_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88070_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88071_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88071_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88099_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88099_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88122_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88122_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88129_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88129_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:51.37 +24:18:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88140_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88140_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88145_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 88145_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88188_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88188_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88222_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88222_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88232_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88232_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88249_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 88249_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88265_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88265_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88290_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88290_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88292_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88292_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88302_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88302_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88340_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88340_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88348_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88348_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88367_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88367_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88370_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88370_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88383_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88383_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88387_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88387_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88389_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88389_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88393_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88393_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88401_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88401_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88405_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88405_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88415_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88415_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88425_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88425_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88429_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88429_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88431_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88431_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88443_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88443_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88445_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88445_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88453_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88453_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88455_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88455_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88462_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88462_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88465_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88465_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88468_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88468_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88479_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88479_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88484_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88484_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88485_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88485_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88490_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88490_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88495_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88495_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88503_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88503_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88505_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88505_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88506_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88506_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88511_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88511_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88532_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88532_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88540_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88540_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88541_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88541_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88544_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88544_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88555_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88555_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88558_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88558_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88575_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88575_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88579_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88579_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88587_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88587_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88596_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88596_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88597_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88597_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88603_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 88603_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88604_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88604_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88605_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88605_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88629_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88629_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88633_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88633_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88650_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88650_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88655_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88655_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88676_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88676_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88700_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88700_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88725_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88725_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88749_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88749_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88771_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88771_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88829_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 88829_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08199_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 08199_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_03-13-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
