This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2711 2461325.7711 13.03 01:13:24.09 +24:11:54.5
129.32623 -38.40043 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 3.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.516 Amherstia 0 -0 0 13.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:13:24.09 +24:11:54.5: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:13:24.09 +24:11:54.5: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7711,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2711 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2711 2461325.7711 13.34 01:06:40.85 +21:30:16.5
127.64785 -41.22755 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.760 Massinga -0 -0 0 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:06:40.85 +21:30:16.5: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:06:40.85 +21:30:16.5: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7711,13.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2711 13.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2711 2461325.7711 13.71 00:42:42.12 +24:14:43.0
120.38425 -38.58325 galactic And Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.778 Theobalda -1 0 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:42:42.12 +24:14:43.0: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:42:42.12 +24:14:43.0: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.2711* 00 42 42.12 +24 14 43.0 13.7 U And 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7711,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2711 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2711 2461325.7711 14.07 01:13:55.17 +25:30:35.7
129.29323 -37.08399 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 3.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.918 Itha -1 1 1 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:13:55.17 +25:30:35.7: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:13:55.17 +25:30:35.7: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7711,14.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2711 14.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2711 2461325.7711 14.25 00:46:14.36 +18:00:50.5
121.18877 -44.84013 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.28017 1997 YV13 -0 -0 0 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:46:14.36 +18:00:50.5: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:46:14.36 +18:00:50.5: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7711,14.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2711 14.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2711 2461325.7711 14.63 00:56:53.55 +18:09:26.9
124.75483 -44.69497 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.10094 Eijikato -1 -0 1 14.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:56:53.55 +18:09:26.9: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:56:53.55 +18:09:26.9: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7711,14.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2711 14.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.87728270 21.07.2026 09:03:07.225 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
First image: 2461242.87728270 21.07.2026 09:03:07.225 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
Last image: 2461325.77133178 12.10.2026 06:30:33.066 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9441
Objects passed selection criteria: 9389
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7191.75
Average stars matched: 6199.75 (86.2064 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234484 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 12 02:28:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.87728270 21.07.2026 09:03:07.225 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
First image: 2461242.87728270 21.07.2026 09:03:07.225 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
Last image: 2461325.77133178 12.10.2026 06:30:33.066 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 182
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.98
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 46794
Objects passed selection criteria: 46641
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 37804.8
Average stars matched: 33893.5 (89.6541 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 263712 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 12 02:29:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461325.77084566
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:55:23.039 +22:00:09.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:55:23.567 +22:00:05.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:55:23.039 +22:00:09.24
Second-epoch image center 00:55:23.567 +22:00:05.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0023 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:55:24.505 +21:59:48.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:55:23.039 +22:00:09.24
Second-epoch image center 00:55:24.505 +21:59:48.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0081 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:55:23.567 +22:00:05.08
Second-epoch second image center 00:55:24.505 +21:59:48.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00587 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7AjYxc9VTr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mstcNJL8Sr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NetZxztxgW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GZv9Bv6P7Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits and wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits and wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits and wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits) and catalog (wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8239 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0309 to 22.5164 deg, Dec +16.5297 to +27.2697 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0309 to 22.5164 deg, Dec 16.5297 to 27.2697 deg
Loaded 6139 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4800 out of 4969 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4969 out of 8239 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.626150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.626150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8239 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0309 to 22.5164 deg, Dec +16.5297 to +27.2697 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0309 to 22.5164 deg, Dec 16.5297 to 27.2697 deg
Loaded 6139 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4800 out of 4969 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4969 out of 8239 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 8234 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0488 to 22.5362 deg, Dec +16.5295 to +27.2628 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0488 to 22.5362 deg, Dec 16.5295 to 27.2628 deg
Loaded 6138 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4773 out of 4949 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4949 out of 8234 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
2.3 pix And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
2.5 pix fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
2.5 pix fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
15.4 mag. And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
15.5 mag. fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
15.6 mag. fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.7AjYxc9VTr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits' -> 'wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=488, bad_region=1854, passed=8239
Got 8239 stars (including 5985 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8239 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5352)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.361 n_q1=1457 n_q2=863 n_q3=1628 n_q4=918 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits -region wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.mstcNJL8Sr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits' -> 'wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=491, bad_region=1854, passed=8234
Got 8234 stars (including 5982 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8234 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4865 stars left (next iteration limit 5351)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits N_match=4865 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=1464 n_q2=856 n_q3=1628 n_q4=917 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits -region wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NetZxztxgW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=525, bad_region=2185, passed=10291
Got 10291 stars (including 7712 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10291 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4857 stars left (next iteration limit 5341)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4857 robust_rms=7.448 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.341 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.341 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4857 robust_rms=0.339 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.668 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.668 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4857 robust_rms=0.299 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.462 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.462 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4857 robust_rms_before=0.813 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.297 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.299 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.523 worst_region_rms_after=0.462 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.050 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.462
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:55:23.618 +22:00:04.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10291 stars ###
'wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2932614.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.813 -> 0.299 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4857 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4703 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4703 pairs (4857 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4703 robust_rms=7.397 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.077 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.077 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4703 robust_rms=0.337 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.669 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.669 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4703 robust_rms=0.297 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.462 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.462 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4703 robust_rms_before=0.297 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.297 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.297 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.462 worst_region_rms_after=0.462 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.462 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.462
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:55:23.618 +22:00:04.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10291 stars ###
'wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2936718.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.297 -> 0.297 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4703 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4703 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits N_match=4703 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=1543 n_q2=909 n_q3=1434 n_q4=817 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.101
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits -region wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.GZv9Bv6P7Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=557, bad_region=2198, passed=10246
Got 10246 stars (including 7620 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10246 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5344)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=7.341 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.629 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.629 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=0.356 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.654 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.654 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=0.318 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.446 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.446 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4860 robust_rms_before=0.830 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.308 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.318 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.505 worst_region_rms_after=0.446 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.089 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.446
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:55:24.557 +21:59:48.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10246 stars ###
'wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2932511.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.830 -> 0.318 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4860 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4706 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4706 pairs (4860 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4706 robust_rms=7.315 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.264 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.264 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4706 robust_rms=0.353 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.629 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.629 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4706 robust_rms=0.316 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.445 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.445 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4706 robust_rms_before=0.316 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.316 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.316 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.445 worst_region_rms_after=0.445 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.445 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.445
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:55:24.557 +21:59:48.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10246 stars ###
'wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2936706.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.316 -> 0.316 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits N_match=4706 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.359 n_q1=1547 n_q2=914 n_q3=1427 n_q4=818 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.111
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits -region wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.199
ref2=And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.172
new1=fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits sigma_overall=0.317 worst_q_ratio=1.101
new2=fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits sigma_overall=0.338 worst_q_ratio=1.111
reference average sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.1855
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931_astrometric_residuals.png (4866 matched stars from wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932_astrometric_residuals.png (4865 matched stars from wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352_astrometric_residuals.png (4703 matched stars from wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353_astrometric_residuals.png (4706 matched stars from wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field And-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:05:41.88 +21:31:33.0: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:52:59.69 +22:24:07.5: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:49:38.86 +21:27:00.0: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:51:36.94 +21:20:06.1: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:00:50.92 +23:21:56.5: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:51:36.94 +21:20:06.1: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:00:50.92 +23:21:56.5: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:52:59.69 +22:24:07.5: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:51:36.94 +21:20:06.1: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1573 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:52:59.69 +22:24:07.5: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1907 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:00:50.92 +23:21:56.5: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2115 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:49:38.86 +21:27:00.0: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:05:41.88 +21:31:33.0: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:49:38.86 +21:27:00.0: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2422 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:05:41.88 +21:31:33.0: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1340 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21495_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 21495_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:57:05.02 +23:23:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21506_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 21506_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21515_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 21515_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21589_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 21589_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21599_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 21599_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21608_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 21608_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04084_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 04084_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:07.73 +22:13:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field And-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:55:23.039 +22:00:09.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:55:23.618 +22:00:04.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:55:23.039 +22:00:09.24
Second-epoch image center 00:55:23.618 +22:00:04.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0026 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:55:24.557 +21:59:48.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:55:23.039 +22:00:09.24
Second-epoch image center 00:55:24.557 +21:59:48.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0083 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:55:23.618 +22:00:04.79
Second-epoch second image center 00:55:24.557 +21:59:48.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00588 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g4k9QwnGMR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K0D1E2PJml
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NLeBEkGBtt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GYtvphnxAX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits and wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits and wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits and wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits) and catalog (wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 45327 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0156 to 22.5375 deg, Dec +16.5297 to +27.2731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0156 to 22.5375 deg, Dec 16.5297 to 27.2731 deg
Loaded 6157 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4637 out of 5124 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5124 out of 45327 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.510700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.510700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.98
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 45327 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0156 to 22.5375 deg, Dec +16.5297 to +27.2731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0156 to 22.5375 deg, Dec 16.5297 to 27.2731 deg
Loaded 6157 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4637 out of 5124 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5124 out of 45327 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 45520 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0488 to 22.5661 deg, Dec +16.5295 to +27.2656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0488 to 22.5661 deg, Dec 16.5295 to 27.2656 deg
Loaded 6142 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4634 out of 5107 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5107 out of 45520 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 118 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
2.1 pix And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
2.5 pix fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
2.4 pix fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
15.5 mag. And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
15.6 mag. fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
15.7 mag. fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.g4k9QwnGMR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits' -> 'wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=2175, bad_region=7925, passed=45302
Got 45302 stars (including 35539 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45302 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5352)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=1504 n_q2=873 n_q3=1559 n_q4=930 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits -region wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.K0D1E2PJml (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits' -> 'wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=2240, bad_region=7970, passed=45494
Got 45494 stars (including 35644 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45494 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4867 stars left (next iteration limit 5353)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits N_match=4867 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=1488 n_q2=874 n_q3=1570 n_q4=935 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits -region wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NLeBEkGBtt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2787, bad_region=7915, passed=46362
Got 46362 stars (including 36562 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46362 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4856 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4856 stars left (next iteration limit 5341)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4856 robust_rms=7.390 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.164 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.164 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4856 robust_rms=0.341 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.674 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.674 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4856 robust_rms=0.299 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.463 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.463 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4856 robust_rms_before=0.300 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.294 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.299 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.462 worst_region_rms_after=0.463 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.462 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.463
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.462 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.462 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.294 arcsec matched=4856
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits N_match=4856 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.335 n_q1=1608 n_q2=896 n_q3=1496 n_q4=856 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits -region wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.GYtvphnxAX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2869, bad_region=8036, passed=46873
Got 46873 stars (including 36996 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46873 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4859 stars left (next iteration limit 5344)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4859 robust_rms=7.315 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.196 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.196 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4859 robust_rms=0.359 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.645 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.645 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4859 robust_rms=0.317 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.446 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.446 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4859 robust_rms_before=0.316 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.307 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.317 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.446 worst_region_rms_after=0.446 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.446 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.446
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.446 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.446 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.307 arcsec matched=4859
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits N_match=4859 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.342 n_q1=1612 n_q2=909 n_q3=1488 n_q4=850 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.072
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits -region wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-29-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_And-07-Q2b1x1_021444_TTUQ2b1x1_917649_IHM0yOTH/wcs_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field And-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:53:55.40 +24:46:17.0: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:41:06.84 +20:19:34.7: 14.62 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:06:46.37 +17:57:19.4: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:05:12.96 +19:15:22.9: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:06:57.18 +17:57:23.3: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:00:58.77 +18:49:29.6: 15.04 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:06:16.83 +21:12:19.1: 14.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:00:58.77 +18:49:29.6: 14.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:05:12.96 +19:15:22.9: 14.62 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:06:16.83 +21:12:19.1: 14.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:41:06.84 +20:19:34.7: 14.51 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:06:57.18 +17:57:23.3: 15.09 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:53:55.40 +24:46:17.0: 14.21 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:00:58.77 +18:49:29.6: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7868 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:41:06.84 +20:19:34.7: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6058 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:05:12.96 +19:15:22.9: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7222 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:06:16.83 +21:12:19.1: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7808 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:06:57.18 +17:57:23.3: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7347 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:06:46.37 +17:57:19.4: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:53:55.40 +24:46:17.0: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4322 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:06:46.37 +17:57:19.4: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9485 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:13:24.09 +24:11:54.5: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:13:24.09 +24:11:54.5: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:06:40.85 +21:30:16.5: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:11:11.77 +18:11:40.9: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:06:40.85 +21:30:16.5: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:11:11.77 +18:11:40.9: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:11:11.77 +18:11:40.9: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5135 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:42:42.12 +24:14:43.0: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:13:55.17 +25:30:35.7: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:42:42.12 +24:14:43.0: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:46:14.36 +18:00:50.5: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:13:55.17 +25:30:35.7: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:46:14.36 +18:00:50.5: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:13:47.06 +24:37:16.5: 14.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:13:47.06 +24:37:16.5: 14.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:13:47.06 +24:37:16.5: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5101 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:37:45.42 +24:41:43.7: 14.31 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:56:53.55 +18:09:26.9: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:37:45.42 +24:41:43.7: 14.39 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:37:45.42 +24:41:43.7: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5681 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:56:53.55 +18:09:26.9: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:52:40.88 +24:33:58.4: 14.48 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:12:00.14 +21:23:43.1: 14.72 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:52:40.88 +24:33:58.4: 14.65 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:52:40.88 +24:33:58.4: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5265 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:12:00.14 +21:23:43.1: 14.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:12:00.14 +21:23:43.1: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7071 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:00:17.98 +23:26:17.3: 14.89 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:13:24.32 +17:41:08.4: 15.03 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:00:17.98 +23:26:17.3: 14.79 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:00:17.98 +23:26:17.3: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7559 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:13:24.32 +17:41:08.4: 15.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:13:24.32 +17:41:08.4: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6547 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 01:12:39.22 +17:42:25.7: 15.17 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 01:12:39.22 +17:42:25.7: 15.75 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:12:39.22 +17:42:25.7: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8019 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:42:13.73 +22:11:48.0: 14.56 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:57:59.20 +18:07:36.9: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:42:13.73 +22:11:48.0: 14.54 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:42:13.73 +22:11:48.0: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6134 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:57:59.20 +18:07:36.9: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:57:59.20 +18:07:36.9: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8111 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:38:12.37 +24:38:12.2: 14.70 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:38:12.37 +24:38:12.2: 14.77 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:38:12.37 +24:38:12.2: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6678 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:52:40.80 +19:22:18.9: 14.61 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-03-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0931.fits at 00:42:07.83 +23:56:06.4: 15.16 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:52:40.80 +19:22:18.9: 14.61 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:52:40.80 +19:22:18.9: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7293 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_04-04-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0932.fits at 00:42:07.83 +23:56:06.4: 14.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:42:07.83 +23:56:06.4: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8437 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55346.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55977.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57318.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58063.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58668.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out60314.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52867_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 52867_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52868_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 52868_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52870_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 52870_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52872_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 52872_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52876_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 52876_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52878_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 52878_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52880_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 52880_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52882_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 52882_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52883_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 52883_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53338_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 53338_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53399_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 53399_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55131_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 55131_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55346_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
Preparing report for the candidate 55346_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55381_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 55381_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55517_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 55517_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55543_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 55543_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55790_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 55790_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55878_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 55878_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55977_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
Preparing report for the candidate 55977_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56042_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 56042_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56133_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 56133_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56284_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 56284_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56420_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 56420_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56453_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 56453_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56526_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 56526_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56531_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 56531_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56539_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 56539_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56657_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 56657_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56762_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 56762_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56787_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 56787_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56804_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 56804_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56809_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 56809_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56849_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 56849_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56896_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 56896_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56962_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 56962_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56996_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 56996_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57071_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 57071_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57157_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 57157_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57200_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 57200_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57220_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 57220_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57318_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
Preparing report for the candidate 57318_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57418_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 57418_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57562_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 57562_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57631_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 57631_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57706_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 57706_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57755_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 57755_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57895_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 57895_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58037_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 58037_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58059_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 58059_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58063_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
Preparing report for the candidate 58063_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58145_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 58145_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58168_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 58168_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58311_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 58311_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58342_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 58342_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58400_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 58400_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58441_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 58441_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58501_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 58501_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58526_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 58526_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58668_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
Preparing report for the candidate 58668_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58690_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 58690_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58878_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 58878_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58902_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 58902_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58959_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 58959_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58995_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 58995_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59059_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 59059_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59096_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 59096_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59220_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 59220_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59222_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 59222_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59224_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 59224_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59319_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 59319_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59336_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 59336_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59468_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 59468_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59517_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 59517_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59545_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 59545_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59613_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 59613_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59788_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 59788_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59790_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 59790_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59850_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 59850_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59939_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 59939_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59969_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 59969_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60015_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 60015_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60134_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 60134_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60225_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 60225_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60289_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 60289_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60314_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
Preparing report for the candidate 60314_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60323_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 60323_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60373_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 60373_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60388_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 60388_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60404_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 60404_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60412_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 60412_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60414_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 60414_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60502_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 60502_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60563_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 60563_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60564_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 60564_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60676_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 60676_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60688_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 60688_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60704_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 60704_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60730_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 60730_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60812_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 60812_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60861_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 60861_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60862_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 60862_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60895_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 60895_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60970_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 60970_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61026_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 61026_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61083_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 61083_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61088_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 61088_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61090_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 61090_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61119_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 61119_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61128_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 61128_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61169_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 61169_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61181_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 61181_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61205_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 61205_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61246_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 61246_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61289_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 61289_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61324_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 61324_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61463_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 61463_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24798_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 24798_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21587_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353
The candidate 21587_fd_And-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_01-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353 did not pass the final checks
