NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cam-05-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits
Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cam-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 333477 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 333477 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits_preview.png'
Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits

renamed 'Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits_preview.png'
Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 575.4353 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 517.8945 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1350.7278 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 497.9834 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1353.3838 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 505.0454 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.34731 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.014 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 21.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-12T01:45:53.8452811' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-12T06:45:53.8452811' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61325.2818732061 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-12T06:46:03.7502700' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61325.2819878473 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.998463934746 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.5002501239189 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.7819444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 4.65638888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.67841129760405 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29504 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29504 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 65.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 30.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 14.401152 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits :) Spent 0.984807 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 20.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-12T01:49:28.1084442' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-12T06:49:28.1084442' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61325.2843531016 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-12T06:49:38.0119636' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61325.28446772 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.998463748021 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.5002503810888 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.8433333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 4.85666666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.6713551068214 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29545 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29545 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 66.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.39 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 20.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 38.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 9.700776 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits :) Spent 0.945090 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits


fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461325.78198895 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits Image size: 941.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:28.051 +77:29:14.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 11:59:28.051 +77:29:14.94 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0305 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Image size: 941.3'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:30.796 +77:29:50.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 11:59:30.796 +77:29:50.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0255 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:59:28.051 +77:29:14.94 Second-epoch second image center 11:59:30.796 +77:29:50.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01015 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ga6hDs1b0L Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.44bwywxZUf Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits &> /tmp/tmp.930fTiOutX Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VDxc13qs96 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2203 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2203 deg Loaded 11837 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5410 out of 5718 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5718 out of 8935 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.862250 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.862250 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2203 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2203 deg Loaded 11837 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5410 out of 5718 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5718 out of 8935 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.7167 to 226.3162 deg, Dec +70.5552 to +82.7628 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.7167 to 226.3162 deg, Dec 70.5552 to 82.7628 deg Loaded 10553 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3703 out of 3846 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3846 out of 9444 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=6.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 2.3 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 3.8 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits 2.5 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 15.5 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.ga6hDs1b0L (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, bad_region=0, passed=8935 Got 8935 stars (including 8237 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=1059 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1313 n_q4=1330 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.299 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.44bwywxZUf (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=593, bad_region=0, passed=9444 Got 9444 stars (including 8840 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5384) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=1140 n_q2=1167 n_q3=1319 n_q4=1270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.930fTiOutX (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=248, bad_region=0, passed=6843 Got 6843 stars (including 6593 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6843 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6843 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6843 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6843 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5382) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=13.490 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.326 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.326 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=0.458 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.706 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.706 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=0.341 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.464 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.464 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4894 robust_rms_before=1.134 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.310 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.341 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.474 worst_region_rms_after=0.464 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.325 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.464 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.474 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.474 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.310 arcsec matched=4894 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1100 n_q2=1003 n_q3=1522 n_q4=1269 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.317 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.VDxc13qs96 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=350, bad_region=1, passed=6798 Got 6798 stars (including 6442 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6798 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6798 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6798 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6798 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=13.561 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.496 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.496 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.451 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.783 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.783 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.292 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.338 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.338 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4898 robust_rms_before=0.893 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.279 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.292 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.336 worst_region_rms_after=0.338 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.927 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.338 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.336 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.336 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.279 arcsec matched=4898 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=1138 n_q2=1041 n_q3=1471 n_q4=1248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.299 ref2=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.150 new1=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits sigma_overall=0.299 worst_q_ratio=1.317 new2=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits sigma_overall=0.288 worst_q_ratio=1.117 reference average sigma_overall=0.3375 worst_q_ratio=1.2245 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284_astrometric_residuals.png (4901 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336_astrometric_residuals.png (4894 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337_astrometric_residuals.png (4898 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits Image size: 941.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:28.051 +77:29:14.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 11:59:28.051 +77:29:14.94 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0305 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Image size: 941.3'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:30.796 +77:29:50.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 11:59:30.796 +77:29:50.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0255 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:59:28.051 +77:29:14.94 Second-epoch second image center 11:59:30.796 +77:29:50.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01015 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.flYeFC7DzP Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3rYuarLMPE Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SRblkOGfYB Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mnfwAXFI0x Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 51561 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2318 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2318 deg Loaded 12006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5102 out of 5807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5807 out of 51561 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.749000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.749000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 51561 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2318 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2318 deg Loaded 12006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5102 out of 5807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5807 out of 51561 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 48477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.3942 to 226.7803 deg, Dec +70.4537 to +82.7794 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.3942 to 226.7803 deg, Dec 70.4537 to 82.7794 deg Loaded 10790 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3498 out of 3909 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3909 out of 48477 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=5.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 28 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 2.2 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 3.5 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits 2.4 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 15.6 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.flYeFC7DzP (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2563, bad_region=1, passed=51537 Got 51537 stars (including 48894 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51537 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1055 n_q2=1197 n_q3=1288 n_q4=1356 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.3rYuarLMPE (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2481, bad_region=0, passed=48460 Got 48460 stars (including 45910 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48460 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5376) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1139 n_q2=1198 n_q3=1281 n_q4=1272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.SRblkOGfYB (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1185, bad_region=39, passed=29475 Got 29475 stars (including 28213 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29475 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29475 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29475 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29475 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5380) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=13.573 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.165 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.165 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=0.462 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.702 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.702 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=0.339 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.464 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.464 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4891 robust_rms_before=1.142 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.310 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.339 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.475 worst_region_rms_after=0.464 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.326 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.464 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.475 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.475 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.310 arcsec matched=4891 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.270 n_q1=1082 n_q2=981 n_q3=1545 n_q4=1283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.mnfwAXFI0x (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1238, bad_region=44, passed=37273 Got 37273 stars (including 35935 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37273 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37273 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37273 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37273 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5377) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=13.625 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.621 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.621 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.455 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.758 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.758 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.291 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.338 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.338 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4890 robust_rms_before=0.882 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.277 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.291 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.340 worst_region_rms_after=0.338 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.924 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.338 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.340 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.340 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.277 arcsec matched=4890 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1148 n_q2=1051 n_q3=1462 n_q4=1229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 10:08:57.14 +76:52:29.3: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:49:42.91 +75:34:55.9: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:33:29.84 +75:11:27.4: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:32:00.43 +74:50:10.9: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:10:33.90 +80:57:27.4: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:49:02.46 +77:50:31.7: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:49:42.91 +75:34:55.9: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:32:00.43 +74:50:10.9: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:08:57.14 +76:52:29.3: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:33:29.84 +75:11:27.4: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:49:42.91 +75:34:55.9: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9646 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:32:00.43 +74:50:10.9: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3805 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:57.14 +76:52:29.3: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7185 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:33:29.84 +75:11:27.4: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2285 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:10:33.90 +80:57:27.4: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:33.90 +80:57:27.4: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0299 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 09:49:02.46 +77:50:31.7: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:49:02.46 +77:50:31.7: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8832 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69569_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 69569_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.28199    2461325.78199    13.62    10:08:57.18 +76:52:29.8   1109 3492   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    13.80    10:08:57.11 +76:52:28.8   1108 3487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69691_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 69691_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    12.25    10:29:36.67 +73:55:23.0   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69693_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 69693_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    12.03    10:51:44.40 +73:26:47.3   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69772_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 69772_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    12.91    10:26:55.65 +72:55:26.3   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69779_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 69779_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    12.89    10:44:51.01 +73:21:48.6   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69786_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 69786_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    12.87    10:35:20.77 +71:45:45.2   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69804_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 69804_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    13.09    10:03:46.68 +74:19:55.6   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69808_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 69808_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.28199    2461325.78199    12.92    13:49:42.77 +75:34:55.7   8801 3227   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    13.00    13:49:43.04 +75:34:56.1   8799 3221   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69813_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 69813_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    13.47    10:23:48.27 +78:20:00.6   1891 4124   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits **** FOUND 10:23:47.85 +78:20:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69824_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 69824_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    13.17    10:52:58.33 +72:15:31.1   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69842_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 69842_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    13.37    10:59:45.93 +79:39:34.0   3108 4609   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits **** FOUND 10:59:45.67 +79:39:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69863_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 69863_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    13.44    10:24:23.20 +73:24:02.3   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69867_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 69867_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.28199    2461325.78199    13.22    12:33:30.24 +75:11:30.0   6166 1984   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    13.23    12:33:29.43 +75:11:24.7   6163 1978   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69876_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 69876_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    13.39    10:57:15.05 +74:22:23.0   2377 1503   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits **** FOUND 10:57:15.40 +74:22:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69886_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 69886_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.28199    2461325.78199    13.31    12:32:00.28 +74:50:09.9   6150 1763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    13.45    12:32:00.57 +74:50:12.0   6149 1757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69898_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 69898_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    13.44    10:32:29.06 +73:12:25.6   1175 1084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69913_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 69913_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    13.30    10:20:23.23 +73:23:34.3   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69922_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 69922_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    14.02    12:20:08.28 +79:11:40.0   5311 4273   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits **** FOUND 12:20:09.61 +79:11:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69944_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 69944_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.28199    2461325.78199    13.88    09:49:02.32 +77:50:31.7   0770 4310   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    13.88    09:49:02.60 +77:50:31.6   0770 4305   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69947_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 69947_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    14.12    10:06:39.03 +74:29:42.4   0434 2202   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69964_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 69964_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 12.28199    2461325.78199    14.00    11:10:34.57 +80:57:26.6   3516 5338   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0336.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    14.07    11:10:33.23 +80:57:28.1   3515 5332   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69984_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 69984_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    13.69    12:49:00.22 +79:11:59.3   6108 4444   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits **** FOUND 12:49:00.13 +79:12:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70096_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 70096_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    13.92    10:21:53.04 +74:50:40.9   1087 2168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70112_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 70112_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    14.49    10:39:17.45 +72:18:39.8   1306 0473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70119_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 70119_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    14.38    10:45:29.35 +74:06:26.3   1867 1456   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70157_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 70157_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    14.38    11:04:08.42 +72:46:10.5   2477 0493   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 47993_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 47993_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    13.09    10:01:52.42 +76:17:41.6   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 19696_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 The candidate 19696_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 12.28447    2461325.78447    13.19    12:46:19.47 +77:06:29.9   6353 3206   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_015013_TTUQ1b1x1_357519_rRwTnBBv/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_01-49-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0337.fits **** FOUND 12:46:19.52 +77:06:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461325.78198895 -observatory V36 14:40:53.73 -18:40:21.9 Mercury (0.0mag) 14:06:09.25 -20:49:50.8 Venus (-4.5mag) 08:41:59.00 +19:30:06.3 Mars (1.0mag) 09:34:55.91 +15:02:43.3 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:42:11.41 +01:35:18.9 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:11:59.28 +20:57:43.6 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:10:15.52 -00:26:10.3 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:10.34 -23:43:29.9 Pluto (14.5mag) 14:14:14.60 -18:50:38.1 Moon (-8.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Oct 12 01:58 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461325.78198895: 09:35:02.81 +15:02:06.0 Io (6.1mag) 09:35:01.30 +15:02:15.6 Europa (6.2mag) 09:35:12.71 +15:01:10.8 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:34:38.04 +15:04:20.5 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:34:44.47 +15:22:59.1 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:34:58.49 +15:02:30.6 Thebe (16.4mag) 09:33:33.08 +15:24:34.8 Elara (17.5mag) 09:37:18.83 +14:25:36.4 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:33:28.31 +15:30:01.2 Carme (18.8mag) 00:41:57.05 +01:35:23.5 Titan (8.2mag) 00:42:08.27 +01:35:22.9 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:41:42.54 +01:32:32.1 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:41:57.45 +01:35:02.1 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:40:30.41 +01:22:58.6 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 12 01:58 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461325.78198895: 02:54:57.52 +21:19:47.0 JWST 18:38:27.14 +14:01:14.6 Chandra 06:32:25.73 +13:48:38.0 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 12 01:58 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461325.78198895 -observatory V36 03:45:52.68 +20:12:04.4 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:25:30.93 -33:28:32.5 14.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:40:10.32 -72:27:39.3 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:15:45.78 +34:40:35.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 07:30:31.80 +25:26:57.7 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:02:21.70 +35:45:46.0 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:26:57.53 +41:29:12.3 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:46:14.62 -13:36:02.7 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:18:45.74 +15:55:15.7 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:51:53.13 -02:47:42.1 16.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:46:17.16 +64:51:37.4 15.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:35:07.28 +43:09:34.7 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:46:31.03 +14:21:04.1 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:29:26.75 -24:31:52.2 13.0mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 00:24:48.90 +18:51:58.1 17.6mag 2P/Encke 22:59:16.14 -31:30:00.7 14.5mag 10P/Tempel 02:12:02.11 +38:35:05.7 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:11:49.90 -08:14:08.5 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:21:51.41 -08:53:49.8 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 07:36:58.16 +15:54:56.2 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 02:59:10.31 +14:17:52.6 17.7mag 88P/Howell 07:42:13.08 +40:30:07.3 17.0mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:04:43.88 +13:49:38.3 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:42:51.20 +13:03:23.1 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 14:08:57.40 -32:28:08.2 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos 06:51:27.68 +19:16:11.1 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 21:32:02.81 +04:09:30.5 9.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:20:42.79 +01:26:28.2 14.4mag 169P/NEAT 03:28:50.84 +04:29:10.1 14.9mag 220P/McNaught 06:04:49.53 +45:24:50.9 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 07:28:55.40 +25:35:41.4 17.9mag 266P/Christensen 09:57:08.14 +31:34:20.9 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.6K Oct 12 01:58 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 05:39:14.97 +51:06:11.70 ASASSN-26fk 2026-10-5.53 -3.9 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 12 01:58 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 12 01:58 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 06:39:10.820 +32:01:59.15 AT 2026adbf 2026-09-12.60 19.69 04:26:40.357 -28:38:15.92 AT 2026adbe 2026-09-24.61 20.77 01:03:16.805 +12:28:54.71 AT 2026adbd 2026-09-13.44 21.76 01:34:02.007 -10:26:08.59 AT 2026adbc 2026-08-12.57 21.81 16:52:56.442 +19:24:13.94 AT 2026adbb 2026-08-07.33 21.82 02:43:42.829 -11:48:08.95 AT 2026adba 2026-09-04.58 21.37 20:50:13.384 -29:30:27.03 AT 2026adaz 2026-09-04.29 20.99 02:42:43.756 +10:45:56.65 AT 2026aday 2026-09-24.46 20.28 18:06:19.544 +25:37:47.03 AT 2026adax 2026-09-03.31 21.27 21:46:09.969 -47:07:16.20 AT 2026adaw 2026-09-15.33 20.34 01:57:46.153 +07:59:41.04 AT 2026adav 2026-08-09.56 21.83 22:56:16.562 -04:40:20.57 AT 2026adau 2026-09-10.39 20.79 02:57:39.200 -36:53:05.12 AT 2026adat 2026-09-16.55 20.94 21:49:33.259 +17:15:20.40 AT 2026adas 2026-09-14.27 21.5 23:05:07.184 -30:28:09.92 AT 2026adar 2026-09-16.41 20.87 21:17:39.325 +21:37:31.98 AT 2026adaq 2026-09-14.26 21.08 17:42:08.778 +27:54:01.84 AT 2026adap 2026-08-08.36 21.71 23:53:19.821 -13:46:16.12 AT 2026adao 2026-08-13.48 20.87 15:24:32.777 +01:18:21.71 AT 2026adan 2026-08-07.28 21.89 23:49:14.137 -24:32:22.35 AT 2026adam 2026-09-04.42 20.93 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 12 01:58 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 90 C