This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2488 2461325.7488 10.72 02:05:48.72 -11:59:43.8
175.61106 -66.90921 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.532 Herculina -0 -1 1 10.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:05:48.72 -11:59:43.8: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:05:48.72 -11:59:43.8: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.2488* 02 05 48.72 -11 59 43.8 10.7 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7488,10.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2488 10.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2488 2461325.7488 11.95 02:07:03.72 -06:21:11.0
167.20934 -62.53100 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.360 Carlova -0 0 0 12.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:07:03.72 -06:21:11.0: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:07:03.72 -06:21:11.0: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.2488* 02 07 03.72 -06 21 11.0 11.9 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7488,11.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2488 11.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2488 2461325.7488 13.02 02:16:54.63 -08:26:31.5
174.17047 -62.47031 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 0.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1093 Freda -1 -0 1 13.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:16:54.63 -08:26:31.5: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:16:54.63 -08:26:31.5: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.2488* 02 16 54.63 -08 26 31.5 13.0 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7488,13.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2488 13.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2488 2461325.7488 13.84 02:07:53.87 -09:02:16.3
171.47486 -64.43630 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 0.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.891 Gunhild 0 -2 2 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:07:53.87 -09:02:16.3: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:07:53.87 -09:02:16.3: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.2488* 02 07 53.87 -09 02 16.3 13.8 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7488,13.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2488 13.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2488 2461325.7488 14.76 03:01:59.11 -07:27:16.2
186.54728 -53.34923 galactic Eri Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.3" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 03:01:59.11 -07:27:16.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 03:01:59.11 -07:27:16.2: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 03:01:59.11 -07:27:16.2: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.2488* 03 01 59.11 -07 27 16.2 14.8 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461325.7488,14.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261012.2488 14.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2488 2461325.7488 14.72 02:53:50.71 -06:48:09.6
183.57764 -54.55319 galactic Eri Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.3" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 02:53:50.71 -06:48:09.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:53:50.71 -06:48:09.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:53:50.71 -06:48:09.6: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.2488* 02 53 50.71 -06 48 09.6 14.7 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461325.7488,14.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261012.2488 14.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.64036141 21.01.2026 03:21:57.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
First image: 2461061.64036141 21.01.2026 03:21:57.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Last image: 2461325.74901971 12.10.2026 05:58:25.303 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5611
Objects passed selection criteria: 5609
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5311.75
Average stars matched: 5158 (97.1055 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 231888 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 12 03:16:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.64036141 21.01.2026 03:21:57.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
First image: 2461061.64036141 21.01.2026 03:21:57.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Last image: 2461325.74901971 12.10.2026 05:58:25.303 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 187
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 28827
Objects passed selection criteria: 28745
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 26629.5
Average stars matched: 25751.5 (96.7029 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 251688 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 12 03:18:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461325.74852780
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:18.043 -10:00:06.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:13.106 -10:01:24.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:18.043 -10:00:06.68
Second-epoch image center 02:34:13.106 -10:01:24.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0297 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:13.339 -10:01:22.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:18.043 -10:00:06.68
Second-epoch image center 02:34:13.339 -10:01:22.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0286 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:34:13.106 -10:01:24.67
Second-epoch second image center 02:34:13.339 -10:01:22.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00110 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00110 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TpPFcLeYJ9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CneuPzyHcv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ux15ue6T6X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5naxj1ktHD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5469 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5514 to 46.7197 deg, Dec -15.3148 to -4.5789 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5514 to 46.7197 deg, Dec -15.3148 to -4.5789 deg
Loaded 4380 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3506 out of 3625 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3625 out of 5469 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.847200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.847200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5469 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5514 to 46.7197 deg, Dec -15.3148 to -4.5789 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5514 to 46.7197 deg, Dec -15.3148 to -4.5789 deg
Loaded 4380 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3506 out of 3625 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3625 out of 5469 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 5437 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5476 to 46.7198 deg, Dec -15.3252 to -4.5789 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5476 to 46.7198 deg, Dec -15.3252 to -4.5789 deg
Loaded 4384 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3482 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 5437 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
2.0 pix Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
15.3 mag. Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.TpPFcLeYJ9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=346, bad_region=0, passed=5469
Got 5469 stars (including 5113 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5469 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5469 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5469 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5469 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.263 n_q1=1140 n_q2=1288 n_q3=1214 n_q4=1211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits -region wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CneuPzyHcv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=355, bad_region=0, passed=5437
Got 5437 stars (including 5070 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5437 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5437 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5437 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5437 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5340)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=1133 n_q2=1306 n_q3=1200 n_q4=1216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.406
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits -region wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ux15ue6T6X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=270, bad_region=0, passed=5220
Got 5220 stars (including 4944 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5220 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4792 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4790 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4794 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4792 stars left (next iteration limit 5269)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4792 robust_rms=13.883 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.494 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.494 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4792 robust_rms=0.489 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.630 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.630 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4792 robust_rms=0.277 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.348 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.348 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4792 robust_rms_before=0.997 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.264 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.277 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.345 worst_region_rms_after=0.348 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.039 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.348
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.345 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.345 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.264 arcsec matched=4792
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits N_match=4792 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.225 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.237 n_q1=1183 n_q2=1203 n_q3=1243 n_q4=1163 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.221
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5naxj1ktHD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=265, bad_region=0, passed=5247
Got 5247 stars (including 4977 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5247 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4821 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4822 stars left (next iteration limit 5303)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4822 robust_rms=13.896 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.068 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.068 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4822 robust_rms=0.479 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.652 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.652 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4822 robust_rms=0.285 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.359 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.359 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4822 robust_rms_before=0.988 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.280 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.285 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.369 worst_region_rms_after=0.359 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.985 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.359
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.369 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.369 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.280 arcsec matched=4822
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits N_match=4822 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.270 n_q1=1189 n_q2=1220 n_q3=1243 n_q4=1170 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits sigma_overall=0.288 worst_q_ratio=1.297
ref2=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits sigma_overall=0.303 worst_q_ratio=1.406
new1=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits sigma_overall=0.261 worst_q_ratio=1.221
new2=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits sigma_overall=0.277 worst_q_ratio=1.142
reference average sigma_overall=0.2955 worst_q_ratio=1.3515
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120_astrometric_residuals.png (4853 matched stars from wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121_astrometric_residuals.png (4855 matched stars from wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290_astrometric_residuals.png (4792 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291_astrometric_residuals.png (4822 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:05:48.72 -11:59:43.8: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:40:02.83 -09:27:41.4: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:38:47.66 -08:54:42.6: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:07:03.72 -06:21:11.0: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:36:27.06 -09:02:04.3: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:34:45.85 -09:40:37.5: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:05:48.72 -11:59:43.8: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:40:02.83 -09:27:41.4: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:34:45.85 -09:40:37.5: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:40:02.83 -09:27:41.4: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9058 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:38:47.66 -08:54:42.6: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:07:03.72 -06:21:11.0: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:34:45.85 -09:40:37.5: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1360 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:36:27.06 -09:02:04.3: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:38:47.66 -08:54:42.6: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1197 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:36:27.06 -09:02:04.3: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1067 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20308.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20401.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20308_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
Preparing report for the candidate 20308_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20395_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 20395_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20401_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
Preparing report for the candidate 20401_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20426_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 20426_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20427_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 20427_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20435_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 20435_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
02:05:48.72 -11:59:43.8
02:07:03.72 -06:21:11.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:18.043 -10:00:06.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:13.106 -10:01:24.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:18.043 -10:00:06.68
Second-epoch image center 02:34:13.106 -10:01:24.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0297 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:34:13.339 -10:01:22.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:18.043 -10:00:06.68
Second-epoch image center 02:34:13.339 -10:01:22.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0286 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:34:13.106 -10:01:24.67
Second-epoch second image center 02:34:13.339 -10:01:22.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00110 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00110 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kR6iGXdFz7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xdw7y9G7GZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ASjDGnCJkA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RD07sDmSOr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits and wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29449 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5478 to 46.7773 deg, Dec -15.3208 to -4.5602 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5478 to 46.7773 deg, Dec -15.3208 to -4.5602 deg
Loaded 4410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3522 out of 3762 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3762 out of 29449 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.750050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.750050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29449 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5478 to 46.7773 deg, Dec -15.3208 to -4.5602 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5478 to 46.7773 deg, Dec -15.3208 to -4.5602 deg
Loaded 4410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3522 out of 3762 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3762 out of 29449 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 29614 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 30.5426 to 46.7769 deg, Dec -15.3320 to -4.5642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 30.5426 to 46.7769 deg, Dec -15.3320 to -4.5642 deg
Loaded 4413 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3508 out of 3765 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3765 out of 29614 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 168 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
1.9 pix Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
15.5 mag. Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.kR6iGXdFz7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=996, bad_region=22, passed=29438
Got 29438 stars (including 28362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29438 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29438 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29438 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29438 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4846 stars left (next iteration limit 5330)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits N_match=4846 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=1183 n_q2=1259 n_q3=1227 n_q4=1177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.301
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits -region wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xdw7y9G7GZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1056, bad_region=21, passed=29593
Got 29593 stars (including 28468 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29593 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4850 stars left (next iteration limit 5335)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits N_match=4850 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=1170 n_q2=1263 n_q3=1234 n_q4=1183 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.361
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits -region wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ASjDGnCJkA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=776, bad_region=32, passed=24070
Got 24070 stars (including 23235 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24070 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24070 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24070 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24070 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4833 stars left (next iteration limit 5316)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=13.774 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.660 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.660 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=0.487 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.633 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.633 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=0.272 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.344 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.344 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4833 robust_rms_before=0.994 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.262 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.272 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.352 worst_region_rms_after=0.344 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.030 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.344
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.352 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.352 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.262 arcsec matched=4833
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits N_match=4833 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.225 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.230 n_q1=1182 n_q2=1167 n_q3=1308 n_q4=1176 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.212
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.RD07sDmSOr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=786, bad_region=35, passed=24196
Got 24196 stars (including 23347 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24196 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4832 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4832 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24196 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4832 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24196 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4832 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24196 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4832 stars left (next iteration limit 5315)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4832 robust_rms=13.810 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.845 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.845 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4832 robust_rms=0.473 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.667 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.667 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4832 robust_rms=0.279 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.352 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.352 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4832 robust_rms_before=0.986 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.274 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.279 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.364 worst_region_rms_after=0.352 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.983 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.352
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.364 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.364 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.274 arcsec matched=4832
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits N_match=4832 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=1183 n_q2=1161 n_q3=1309 n_q4=1179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-57-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0290.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_005913_TTUQ1b1x1_2247143_h1XbrcQ8/wcs_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:48:02.40 -12:25:52.8: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:12:29.14 -13:01:17.1: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:48:02.40 -12:25:52.8: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:12:29.14 -13:01:17.1: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:12:29.14 -13:01:17.1: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7045 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:48:02.40 -12:25:52.8: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6453 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:16:54.63 -08:26:31.5: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:16:54.63 -08:26:31.5: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:07:53.87 -09:02:16.3: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:39:08.67 -09:48:18.0: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:07:53.87 -09:02:16.3: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:39:08.67 -09:48:18.0: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:39:08.67 -09:48:18.0: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7975 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:46:06.90 -07:20:25.3: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:46:06.90 -07:20:25.3: 13.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:46:06.90 -07:20:25.3: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8111 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:29:59.13 -12:47:10.5: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:29:59.13 -12:47:10.5: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:29:59.13 -12:47:10.5: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0588 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:06:51.89 -13:33:40.6: 14.66 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:02:53.52 -12:10:40.3: 14.57 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:21:47.13 -06:55:44.4: 14.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:06:51.89 -13:33:40.6: 14.75 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:02:53.52 -12:10:40.3: 14.73 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:06:51.89 -13:33:40.6: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2905 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:02:53.52 -12:10:40.3: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4086 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:03:13.54 -10:45:26.8: 14.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:21:47.13 -06:55:44.4: 15.02 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:21:47.13 -06:55:44.4: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4890 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:18:18.53 -10:05:28.2: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:03:13.54 -10:45:26.8: 14.56 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:03:13.54 -10:45:26.8: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4951 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:08:01.13 -09:13:01.9: 14.75 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:15:29.63 -11:51:05.5: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:18:18.53 -10:05:28.2: 15.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:18:18.53 -10:05:28.2: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5552 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:08:01.13 -09:13:01.9: 15.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:08:01.13 -09:13:01.9: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6126 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:27:09.08 -06:51:21.2: 14.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:15:29.63 -11:51:05.5: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:15:29.63 -11:51:05.5: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5337 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:14:50.68 -12:21:47.7: 15.31 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:14:51.76 -06:00:15.7: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:08:03.08 -07:49:58.1: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:27:09.08 -06:51:21.2: 14.89 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:27:09.08 -06:51:21.2: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5735 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:14:50.68 -12:21:47.7: 15.41 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:08:07.62 -09:49:43.5: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:14:50.68 -12:21:47.7: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.5114 delta=0.84 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:14:51.76 -06:00:15.7: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:14:51.76 -06:00:15.7: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6646 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:08:03.08 -07:49:58.1: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:08:03.08 -07:49:58.1: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6819 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:08:19.36 -09:37:19.5: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:08:07.62 -09:49:43.5: 14.81 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:08:07.62 -09:49:43.5: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7145 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:17:04.07 -08:25:34.7: 15.03 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:08:19.36 -09:37:19.5: 14.99 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:08:19.36 -09:37:19.5: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8119 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 03:01:59.11 -07:27:16.2: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-21-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0120.fits at 02:53:50.71 -06:48:09.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:17:04.07 -08:25:34.7: 15.21 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:17:04.07 -08:25:34.7: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4975 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 03:01:59.11 -07:27:16.2: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-22-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 02:53:50.71 -06:48:09.6: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32484.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32740.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33140.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33154.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32114_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32114_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32119_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32119_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32120_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32120_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32163_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32163_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:05:48.72 -11:59:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32164_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32164_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32166_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32166_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32192_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32192_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32209_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32209_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32233_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32233_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32237_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32237_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32247_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32247_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32258_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32258_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:07:03.72 -06:21:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32260_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32260_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32284_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32284_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32290_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32290_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32298_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32298_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32300_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32300_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32302_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32302_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32321_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32321_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:02:42.89 -07:39:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32327_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32327_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:13:15.13 -10:29:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32328_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32328_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32340_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32340_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32354_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32354_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32364_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32364_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32370_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32370_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32390_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32390_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32453_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32453_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32459_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32459_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32475_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32475_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32477_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32477_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32483_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32483_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32484_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
Preparing report for the candidate 32484_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32515_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32515_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32524_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32524_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32527_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32527_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32528_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32528_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32552_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32552_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32553_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32553_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32558_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32558_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32561_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32561_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32564_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32564_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32565_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32565_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32570_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32570_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32571_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32571_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32579_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32579_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32589_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32589_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32594_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32594_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32597_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32597_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32602_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32602_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32608_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32608_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32610_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32610_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32620_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32620_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32631_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32631_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32643_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32643_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32644_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32644_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32654_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32654_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32655_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32655_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32668_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32668_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32673_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32673_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32675_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32675_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32679_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32679_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32680_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32680_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32689_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32689_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32692_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32692_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32701_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32701_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32710_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32710_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32712_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32712_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32714_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32714_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32716_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32716_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32723_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32723_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32729_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32729_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32730_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32730_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32740_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
Preparing report for the candidate 32740_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32742_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32742_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32744_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32744_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32748_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32748_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32753_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32753_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32755_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32755_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32757_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32757_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32759_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32759_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32762_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32762_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32764_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32764_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32770_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32770_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32774_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32774_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32778_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32778_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32789_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32789_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32801_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32801_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32803_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32803_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32804_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32804_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32805_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32805_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32812_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32812_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32815_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32815_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32824_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32824_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32847_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32847_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32862_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32862_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32872_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32872_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32873_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32873_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32876_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32876_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32882_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32882_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32883_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32883_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32897_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32897_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32902_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32902_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32905_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32905_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32909_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32909_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32917_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32917_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32919_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32919_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32921_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32921_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32923_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32923_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32925_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32925_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32933_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32933_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32936_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32936_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32940_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32940_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32941_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32941_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32949_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32949_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32950_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32950_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32951_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32951_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32952_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32952_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32954_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32954_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32959_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32959_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32960_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32960_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32964_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32964_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32965_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32965_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32971_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32971_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32977_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32977_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32979_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32979_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32985_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32985_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32990_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32990_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32996_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 32996_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33016_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33016_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33018_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33018_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33019_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33019_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33020_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33020_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33022_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33022_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33024_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33024_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33026_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33026_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33033_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33033_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33034_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33034_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33037_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33037_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33038_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33038_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33039_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33039_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33045_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33045_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33047_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33047_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33058_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33058_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33061_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33061_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33062_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33062_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33064_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33064_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33065_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33065_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33067_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33067_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33070_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33070_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33071_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33071_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33073_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33073_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33077_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33077_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33078_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33078_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33083_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33083_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33084_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33084_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33096_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33096_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33097_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33097_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33105_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33105_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33108_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33108_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33112_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33112_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33113_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33113_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33114_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33114_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33119_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33119_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33127_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33127_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33140_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
Preparing report for the candidate 33140_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33153_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 33153_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33154_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
Preparing report for the candidate 33154_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11334_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291
The candidate 11334_fd_Cet-08-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0291 did not pass the final checks
