This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2223 2461325.7223 11.51 23:04:40.23 -04:22:19.3
70.00164 -55.85233 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.236 Honoria -0 -0 0 11.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:04:40.23 -04:22:19.3: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:04:40.23 -04:22:19.3: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7223,11.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2223 11.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2223 2461325.7223 12.90 23:28:24.04 -05:14:55.2
77.12709 -60.50879 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.317 Roxane -0 -0 0 12.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:24.04 -05:14:55.2: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:24.04 -05:14:55.2: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7223,12.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2223 12.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2223 2461325.7223 13.54 23:15:58.20 -01:58:39.4
76.60247 -56.00984 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.328 Gudrun -1 0 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:58.20 -01:58:39.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:58.20 -01:58:39.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7223,13.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2223 13.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2223 2461325.7223 13.73 23:13:40.95 -04:28:55.1
72.78642 -57.50127 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.788 Hohensteina -0 -0 0 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:13:40.95 -04:28:55.1: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:13:40.95 -04:28:55.1: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7223,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2223 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2223 2461325.7223 14.46 23:11:48.19 -01:45:22.9
75.45731 -55.16475 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.673 Edda 0 1 1 14.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:11:48.19 -01:45:22.9: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:11:48.19 -01:45:22.9: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7223,14.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2223 14.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2223 2461325.7223 14.48 23:04:16.79 -00:35:35.4
74.36552 -53.04826 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1157 Arabia 3 -2 3 14.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:04:16.79 -00:35:35.4: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:04:16.79 -00:35:35.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7223,14.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2223 14.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2223 2461325.7223 14.60 23:35:06.96 -04:51:14.9
80.32021 -61.24214 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.223 Rosa 1 0 1 14.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:06.96 -04:51:14.9: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:06.96 -04:51:14.9: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7223,14.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2223 14.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
First image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Last image: 2461325.72257149 12.10.2026 05:20:20.177 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4972
Objects passed selection criteria: 4971
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4824.5
Average stars matched: 4670.5 (96.808 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232276 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 12 02:22:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
First image: 2461242.93564273 21.07.2026 10:27:09.532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Last image: 2461325.72257149 12.10.2026 05:20:20.177 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 107
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.06
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 32 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 29204
Objects passed selection criteria: 29120
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 28338
Average stars matched: 26993.8 (95.2564 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 255328 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 12 02:24:29 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461325.72200316
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.858 -01:59:59.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:34.858 -01:59:59.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0081 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:31.933 -02:00:12.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:31.933 -02:00:12.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0118 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:34.858 -01:59:59.18
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:31.933 -02:00:12.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01277 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SCvsTukH0B
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TqqEau8dTn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Cf8ndD2Rym
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9sPuWcpPMx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to +3.2586 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to 3.2586 deg
Loaded 4387 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3810 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3810 out of 6415 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.655300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.655300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to +3.2586 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2860 to 355.0261 deg, Dec -7.2671 to 3.2586 deg
Loaded 4387 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3810 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3810 out of 6415 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2725 to 355.0121 deg, Dec -7.2776 to +3.2517 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2725 to 355.0121 deg, Dec -7.2776 to 3.2517 deg
Loaded 4385 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3695 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 6260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
2.2 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
15.3 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.SCvsTukH0B (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, bad_region=1637, passed=6415
Got 6415 stars (including 4478 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4346 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4337 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4337 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4337 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4346 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4338 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4338 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4338 stars left (next iteration limit 4770)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits N_match=4338 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1429 n_q2=758 n_q3=1353 n_q4=798 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.040
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.TqqEau8dTn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=360, bad_region=1607, passed=6260
Got 6260 stars (including 4361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4238 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4238 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4230 stars left (next iteration limit 4653)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits N_match=4230 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=1416 n_q2=724 n_q3=1303 n_q4=787 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.063
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Cf8ndD2Rym (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=409, bad_region=1694, passed=6714
Got 6714 stars (including 4677 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6714 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4542 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4536 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4536 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4536 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5334 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4542 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4536 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5334 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4536 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5334 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4536 stars left (next iteration limit 4989)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4536 robust_rms=7.792 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.823 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.823 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4536 robust_rms=0.419 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.655 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.655 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4536 robust_rms=0.326 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.382 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.382 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4536 robust_rms_before=0.936 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.326 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.326 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.391 worst_region_rms_after=0.382 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.950 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.382
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.391 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.391 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.326 arcsec matched=4536
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits N_match=4536 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.349 n_q1=1479 n_q2=830 n_q3=1376 n_q4=851 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.045
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9sPuWcpPMx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=387, bad_region=1701, passed=6703
Got 6703 stars (including 4679 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6703 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4542 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4535 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4535 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4535 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5317 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4542 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4535 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5317 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4535 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5317 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4535 stars left (next iteration limit 4988)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4535 robust_rms=7.767 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.693 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.693 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4535 robust_rms=0.405 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.681 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.681 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4535 robust_rms=0.310 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.367 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.367 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4535 robust_rms_before=0.941 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.322 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.310 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.368 worst_region_rms_after=0.367 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.896 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.367
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.368 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.368 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.322 arcsec matched=4535
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits N_match=4535 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1477 n_q2=848 n_q3=1367 n_q4=843 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.034
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits sigma_overall=0.314 worst_q_ratio=1.040
ref2=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.063
new1=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.045
new2=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits sigma_overall=0.338 worst_q_ratio=1.034
reference average sigma_overall=0.3465 worst_q_ratio=1.0515
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017_astrometric_residuals.png (4338 matched stars from wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018_astrometric_residuals.png (4230 matched stars from wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282_astrometric_residuals.png (4536 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283_astrometric_residuals.png (4535 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:04:40.23 -04:22:19.3: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:07:28.73 -02:29:13.3: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:01:58.96 +00:24:25.2: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:01:08.68 -01:13:12.8: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:07:13.52 -01:29:21.7: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:07:28.73 -02:29:13.3: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:01:08.68 -01:13:12.8: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:01:58.96 +00:24:25.2: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:04:40.23 -04:22:19.3: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:07:28.73 -02:29:13.3: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1663 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:58.96 +00:24:25.2: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0169 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:08.68 -01:13:12.8: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1857 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:07:13.52 -01:29:21.7: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:07:13.52 -01:29:21.7: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0665 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20215.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20215_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 20215_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20217_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 20217_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20218_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 20218_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20219_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 20219_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20220_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 20220_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:04:40.23 -04:22:19.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:34.858 -01:59:59.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:34.858 -01:59:59.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0081 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:31.933 -02:00:12.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:34.580 -02:00:27.91
Second-epoch image center 23:08:31.933 -02:00:12.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0118 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:34.858 -01:59:59.18
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:31.933 -02:00:12.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01277 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wgTZQLQ1PO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p8MNVcf1b3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MrzWofOGtX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ArmBeTrPaE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits and wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 35879 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to +3.2602 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to 3.2602 deg
Loaded 4394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3591 out of 3893 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3893 out of 35879 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.537600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.537600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.06
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 35879 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to +3.2602 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2853 to 355.0336 deg, Dec -7.2742 to 3.2602 deg
Loaded 4394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3591 out of 3893 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3893 out of 35879 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 36137 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.2724 to 355.0227 deg, Dec -7.2779 to +3.2557 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.2724 to 355.0227 deg, Dec -7.2779 to 3.2557 deg
Loaded 4393 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3594 out of 3890 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3890 out of 36137 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 64 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
2.1 pix Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
2.1 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
2.1 pix fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
15.5 mag. Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.wgTZQLQ1PO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1717, bad_region=7702, passed=35853
Got 35853 stars (including 26731 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35853 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4852 stars left (next iteration limit 5337)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits N_match=4852 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1558 n_q2=904 n_q3=1485 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.048
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.p8MNVcf1b3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=8, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1465, bad_region=7825, passed=36110
Got 36110 stars (including 27137 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36110 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4854 stars left (next iteration limit 5339)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits N_match=4854 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=1577 n_q2=898 n_q3=1478 n_q4=901 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits -region wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.MrzWofOGtX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1629, bad_region=6716, passed=35623
Got 35623 stars (including 27795 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35623 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30436 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30436 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30436 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4845 stars left (next iteration limit 5329)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4845 robust_rms=7.430 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.400 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.400 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4845 robust_rms=0.409 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.745 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.745 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4845 robust_rms=0.323 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.383 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.383 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4845 robust_rms_before=0.942 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.319 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.323 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.386 worst_region_rms_after=0.383 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.943 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.383
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.386 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.386 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.319 arcsec matched=4845
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits N_match=4845 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.349 n_q1=1610 n_q2=870 n_q3=1499 n_q4=866 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.060
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ArmBeTrPaE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1590, bad_region=6712, passed=35630
Got 35630 stars (including 27794 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35630 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4841 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4842 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4842 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4842 stars left (next iteration limit 5325)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4842 robust_rms=7.457 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.240 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.240 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4842 robust_rms=0.409 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.709 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.709 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4842 robust_rms=0.307 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.365 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.365 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4842 robust_rms_before=0.947 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.315 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.307 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.386 worst_region_rms_after=0.365 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.909 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.365
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.386 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.386 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.315 arcsec matched=4842
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits N_match=4842 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.342 n_q1=1614 n_q2=869 n_q3=1487 n_q4=872 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.046
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-19-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_005043_TTUQ2b1x1_412445_RMV4cAAM/wcs_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:26:38.17 -05:12:46.5: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:07.68 +01:32:11.8: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:24.04 -05:14:55.2: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:57:22.32 -06:11:43.6: 14.52 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:22.10 -04:43:35.2: 14.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:32.64 -01:07:36.7: 14.40 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:14:52.05 -01:03:12.2: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:11:06.93 -02:48:55.0: 15.11 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:24:17.15 -06:14:04.1: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:11:06.93 -02:48:55.0: 15.27 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:22.10 -04:43:35.2: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:14:52.05 -01:03:12.2: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:07.68 +01:32:11.8: 14.56 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:58.20 -01:58:39.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:11:06.93 -02:48:55.0: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8988 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:57:22.32 -06:11:43.6: 14.30 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:22.10 -04:43:35.2: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6718 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:07.68 +01:32:11.8: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5366 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:14:52.05 -01:03:12.2: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6160 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:32.64 -01:07:36.7: 14.48 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:24.04 -05:14:55.2: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:57:22.32 -06:11:43.6: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2651 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:32.64 -01:07:36.7: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6171 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:26:38.17 -05:12:46.5: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:26:38.17 -05:12:46.5: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1115 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:24:17.15 -06:14:04.1: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:17.15 -06:14:04.1: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4319 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:58.20 -01:58:39.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:13:40.95 -04:28:55.1: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:21:22.43 -03:24:14.4: 14.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:06.32 +00:02:55.4: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:23:59.08 +00:39:26.3: 14.40 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:30:00.49 +00:44:33.2: 15.08 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:39.23 -02:16:31.5: 14.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:29:29.35 -00:58:11.5: 14.28 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:13:40.95 -04:28:55.1: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:30:00.49 +00:44:33.2: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:06.32 +00:02:55.4: 13.97 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:36:05.36 -03:08:50.0: 14.96 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:23:59.08 +00:39:26.3: 14.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:06.32 +00:02:55.4: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0764 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:00.49 +00:44:33.2: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5870 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:29:29.35 -00:58:11.5: 14.10 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:23:59.08 +00:39:26.3: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4149 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:29.35 -00:58:11.5: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0842 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:21:22.43 -03:24:14.4: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:22.43 -03:24:14.4: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2753 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:39.23 -02:16:31.5: 14.24 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:39.23 -02:16:31.5: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3043 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:36:05.36 -03:08:50.0: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:05.36 -03:08:50.0: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5320 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:27:07.19 -01:17:41.2: 14.24 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:33:02.62 +01:48:14.9: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:35.83 -02:08:01.5: 14.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:40.00 -03:09:08.4: 14.46 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:35.83 -02:08:01.5: 15.18 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:27:07.19 -01:17:41.2: 14.27 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:27:07.19 -01:17:41.2: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5273 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:35.83 -02:08:01.5: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6870 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:33:02.62 +01:48:14.9: 14.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:02.62 +01:48:14.9: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4909 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:43.61 -02:57:42.6: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:11:48.19 -01:45:22.9: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:04:16.79 -00:35:35.4: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:40.00 -03:09:08.4: 14.44 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:40.00 -03:09:08.4: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6011 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:43.61 -02:57:42.6: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:43.61 -02:57:42.6: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6788 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:04:16.79 -00:35:35.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:11:48.19 -01:45:22.9: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:45.63 -00:31:10.6: 14.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:45.07 -03:44:36.7: 15.18 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:12.30 -03:02:19.5: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:45.63 -00:31:10.6: 14.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:32.44 -01:44:27.0: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:45.63 -00:31:10.6: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5833 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:12.30 -03:02:19.5: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:45.07 -03:44:36.7: 15.34 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:12.30 -03:02:19.5: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4046 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:45.07 -03:44:36.7: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7057 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:14:34.32 +02:10:31.0: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:32.44 -01:44:27.0: 14.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:32.44 -01:44:27.0: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6449 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:14:34.32 +02:10:31.0: 14.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:14:34.32 +02:10:31.0: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5114 delta=-0.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:45.98 -06:08:44.0: 14.74 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:45.98 -06:08:44.0: 14.53 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:45.98 -06:08:44.0: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5531 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:25:01.75 -06:04:51.4: 14.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:34.97 -01:39:03.2: 15.18 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:06.96 -04:51:14.9: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:34.97 -01:39:03.2: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:34.97 -01:39:03.2: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6576 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:29:59.47 +00:11:49.4: 15.07 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:06.96 -04:51:14.9: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:25:01.75 -06:04:51.4: 14.56 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:01.75 -06:04:51.4: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7240 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:29:59.47 +00:11:49.4: 14.99 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:59.47 +00:11:49.4: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8042 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:24.14 -05:55:30.0: 14.44 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:35:25.67 -05:14:28.4: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:24.14 -05:55:30.0: 14.89 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:24.14 -05:55:30.0: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4868 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:21.58 -01:06:23.3: 14.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:35:25.67 -05:14:28.4: 15.02 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:25.67 -05:14:28.4: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7043 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:31:22.81 -04:32:38.8: 14.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:21.58 -01:06:23.3: 14.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:21.58 -01:06:23.3: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7342 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:31:22.81 -04:32:38.8: 14.92 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:22.81 -04:32:38.8: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6282 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:12.51 -03:56:02.3: 15.51 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:29.47 -04:53:31.1: 15.07 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:29.47 -04:53:31.1: 14.65 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:29.47 -04:53:31.1: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6529 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:33:51.70 +01:25:44.9: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:12.51 -03:56:02.3: 15.61 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.56 +/- 0.24
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:12.51 -03:56:02.3: ref_mag=15.56 +/- 0.24 new_mean_mag=14.6953 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:49.37 -06:04:06.7: 15.16 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:33:51.70 +01:25:44.9: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:51.70 +01:25:44.9: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8261 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:21:18.72 -06:09:23.4: 14.91 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:49.37 -06:04:06.7: 14.98 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:49.37 -06:04:06.7: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6522 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:26:45.50 -05:49:45.2: 15.40 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:55.81 -04:10:45.2: 15.06 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:51.66 -03:17:40.6: 15.41 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:21:18.72 -06:09:23.4: 15.23 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:30:40.83 +00:42:35.0: 15.09 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:18.72 -06:09:23.4: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7054 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:26:45.50 -05:49:45.2: 15.50 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:55.81 -04:10:45.2: 14.96 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:30:40.83 +00:42:35.0: 15.26 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:26:45.50 -05:49:45.2: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.8372 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:40.83 +00:42:35.0: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8818 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:55.81 -04:10:45.2: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7985 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 22:57:37.50 -01:05:30.5: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:51.66 -03:17:40.6: 15.48 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:51.66 -03:17:40.6: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.8609 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 22:57:37.50 -01:05:30.5: 14.49 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:57:37.50 -01:05:30.5: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7449 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:34:36.73 -01:58:55.3: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:28:14.15 -00:00:45.0: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:32:12.58 -03:42:38.3: 15.05 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:34:36.73 -01:58:55.3: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:36.73 -01:58:55.3: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7440 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:22:18.34 -00:25:29.2: 15.11 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:17:09.88 -05:06:36.7: 15.13 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:24:01.50 -03:38:19.4: 14.37 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:28:14.15 -00:00:45.0: 14.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:14.15 -00:00:45.0: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8387 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:19:20.68 -03:54:11.0: 15.20 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:29:07.05 -04:03:28.8: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:32:12.58 -03:42:38.3: 15.04 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:18:29.98 -01:52:32.8: 14.81 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:12.58 -03:42:38.3: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8599 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:22:18.34 -00:25:29.2: 14.75 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:17:09.88 -05:06:36.7: 15.22 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:22:18.34 -00:25:29.2: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7900 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:24:01.50 -03:38:19.4: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:17:09.88 -05:06:36.7: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7300 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:01.50 -03:38:19.4: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7465 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:18:29.98 -01:52:32.8: 14.91 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:19:20.68 -03:54:11.0: 15.51 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:18:29.98 -01:52:32.8: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7575 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:19:20.68 -03:54:11.0: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.8405 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:29:07.05 -04:03:28.8: 15.21 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:07.05 -04:03:28.8: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9219 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:17:11.48 -05:42:18.2: 15.24 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-27-09_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1017.fits at 23:15:31.67 -03:41:18.0: 14.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:17:11.48 -05:42:18.2: 15.29 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:17:11.48 -05:42:18.2: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8384 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-28-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1018.fits at 23:15:31.67 -03:41:18.0: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:31.67 -03:41:18.0: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7786 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52555.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52592.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52603.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52720.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52735.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52760.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52520_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52520_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52522_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52522_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52523_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52523_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52525_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52525_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52529_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52529_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52532_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52532_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52541_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52541_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:04:40.23 -04:22:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52548_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52548_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52555_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 52555_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52560_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52560_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52581_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52581_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52592_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 52592_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52603_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 52603_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52635_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52635_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52644_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52644_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52670_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52670_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52684_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52684_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52694_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52694_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52696_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52696_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52706_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52706_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52712_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52712_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52718_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52718_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52720_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 52720_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52723_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52723_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52728_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52728_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52732_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52732_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52735_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 52735_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52742_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52742_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52743_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52743_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52745_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52745_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52747_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52747_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52748_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52748_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52751_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52751_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52752_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52752_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52756_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52756_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52760_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 52760_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52767_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52767_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52773_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52773_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52774_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52774_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52777_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52777_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52778_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52778_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52786_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52786_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52788_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52788_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52790_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52790_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52792_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52792_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52800_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52800_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52804_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52804_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52805_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52805_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52809_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52809_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52814_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52814_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52815_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52815_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52817_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52817_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52818_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52818_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52829_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52829_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52838_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52838_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52839_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52839_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52852_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52852_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52853_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52853_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52863_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52863_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52872_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52872_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52889_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52889_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52906_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 52906_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05218_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 05218_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03931_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 03931_fd_Psc-09-Q2b1x1_2026-10-12_00-20-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
