This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.2433* 00 42 10.90 +01 35 14.5 7.1 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7433,7.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2433 7.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.2433* 00 41 57.74 +01 35 27.6 8.3 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7433,8.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2433 8.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.2433* 00 41 43.14 +01 32 36.0 10.3 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7433,10.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2433 10.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.2433* 00 41 57.74 +01 35 27.5 8.3 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7433,8.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2433 8.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2433 2461325.7433 12.73 00:24:18.68 +10:05:42.2
111.99770 -52.19985 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.392 Wilhelmina -0 -0 0 13.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:24:18.68 +10:05:42.2: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:24:18.68 +10:05:42.2: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7433,12.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2433 12.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2433 2461325.7433 12.71 00:47:22.92 +07:13:31.3
121.14974 -55.63235 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.510 Mabella -0 0 0 12.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:47:22.92 +07:13:31.3: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:47:22.92 +07:13:31.3: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7433,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2433 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2433 2461325.7433 12.64 00:57:44.18 +01:21:25.3
126.22964 -61.47439 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.58 Concordia 0 -0 0 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:57:44.18 +01:21:25.3: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:57:44.18 +01:21:25.3: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.2433* 00 57 44.18 +01 21 25.3 12.6 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7433,12.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2433 12.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2433 2461325.7433 13.54 00:48:11.92 +10:37:05.5
121.63188 -52.24538 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1235 Schorria -0 0 0 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:48:11.92 +10:37:05.5: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:48:11.92 +10:37:05.5: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7433,13.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2433 13.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2433 2461325.7433 14.21 00:56:14.75 +05:07:12.1
125.17467 -57.73078 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2251 Tikhov -0 0 0 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:56:14.75 +05:07:12.1: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:56:14.75 +05:07:12.1: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7433,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2433 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2433 2461325.7433 14.58 01:11:19.27 +07:48:07.0
131.48372 -54.73932 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3175 Netto 0 -1 1 14.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:11:19.27 +07:48:07.0: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:11:19.27 +07:48:07.0: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7433,14.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2433 14.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 12.2433 2461325.7433 14.51 01:12:27.00 +07:57:02.7
131.92704 -54.55361 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.822 Lalage -0 -1 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:12:27.00 +07:57:02.7: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:12:27.00 +07:57:02.7: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7433,14.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2433 14.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.2433* 00 42 10.90 +01 35 14.5 7.7 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7433,7.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2433 7.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 10 12.2433* 00 41 43.14 +01 32 36.0 10.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461325.7433,10.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261012.2433 10.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
First image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Last image: 2461325.74364457 12.10.2026 05:50:40.891 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 13
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6901
Objects passed selection criteria: 6898
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6346.25
Average stars matched: 5861 (92.3538 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232868 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 12 02:23:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
First image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Last image: 2461325.74364457 12.10.2026 05:50:40.891 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 238
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.14
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 32360
Objects passed selection criteria: 32280
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 30885.5
Average stars matched: 28934.2 (93.6823 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 254068 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Oct 9 16:07:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-234-g1a8c12b2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-09)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Oct 12 02:25:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461325.74301378
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:10.737 +05:58:21.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81
Second-epoch image center 00:51:10.737 +05:58:21.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0703 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:12.016 +05:57:41.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81
Second-epoch image center 00:51:12.016 +05:57:41.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0707 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:10.737 +05:58:21.50
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:12.016 +05:57:41.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01227 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dcNm7yLKWn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0ka85ix818
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1tDqfXsn0z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0YL0V9W9Ky
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec +0.6752 to +11.2667 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec 0.6752 to 11.2667 deg
Loaded 4455 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3613 out of 3699 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3699 out of 5718 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.625400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.625400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec +0.6752 to +11.2667 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec 0.6752 to 11.2667 deg
Loaded 4455 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3613 out of 3699 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3699 out of 5718 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 5640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8902 to 20.7787 deg, Dec +0.7135 to +11.2815 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8902 to 20.7787 deg, Dec 0.7135 to 11.2815 deg
Loaded 4441 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3584 out of 3667 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3667 out of 5640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 12 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
2.3 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
2.7 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
2.7 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
15.2 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.dcNm7yLKWn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=0, passed=5718
Got 5718 stars (including 5395 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5718 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.335 n_q1=1254 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1220 n_q4=1190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0ka85ix818 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=0, passed=5640
Got 5640 stars (including 5317 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5640 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=1266 n_q2=1252 n_q3=1219 n_q4=1171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.1tDqfXsn0z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=353, bad_region=0, passed=7120
Got 7120 stars (including 6755 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7120 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7120 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7120 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7120 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=13.218 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.275 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.275 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=0.410 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.700 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.700 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=0.263 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.309 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.309 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4909 robust_rms_before=0.972 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.258 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.263 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.321 worst_region_rms_after=0.309 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.047 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.309
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.321 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.321 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.258 arcsec matched=4909
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.244 n_q1=1298 n_q2=1229 n_q3=1239 n_q4=1143 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.058
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0YL0V9W9Ky (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=341, bad_region=0, passed=7063
Got 7063 stars (including 6719 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7063 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5404)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=13.183 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.400 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.400 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=0.410 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.657 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.657 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=0.262 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.313 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.313 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4911 robust_rms_before=0.968 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.265 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.262 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.327 worst_region_rms_after=0.313 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.068 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.313
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.327 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.327 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.265 arcsec matched=4911
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=1310 n_q2=1224 n_q3=1243 n_q4=1134 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.072
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.118
ref2=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits sigma_overall=0.389 worst_q_ratio=1.093
new1=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits sigma_overall=0.270 worst_q_ratio=1.058
new2=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.072
reference average sigma_overall=0.358 worst_q_ratio=1.1055
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967_astrometric_residuals.png (4907 matched stars from wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968_astrometric_residuals.png (4908 matched stars from wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282_astrometric_residuals.png (4909 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283_astrometric_residuals.png (4911 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-49-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-12_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_005128_TTUQ1b1x1_393798_fU8AQCB2/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:53:38.68 +06:06:31.6: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:17:12.23 +02:00:46.0: 10.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:49:06.95 +05:59:29.3: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:38:22.30 +08:36:54.3: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:43:41.92 +06:37:16.7: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:07:08.33 +05:12:40.0: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:48:30.82 +05:48:30.9: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:49:06.95 +05:59:29.3: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:53:38.68 +06:06:31.6: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:48:30.82 +05:48:30.9: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:38:22.30 +08:36:54.3: 12.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:43:41.92 +06:37:16.7: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:53:38.68 +06:06:31.6: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0256 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:49:06.95 +05:59:29.3: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0971 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:07:08.33 +05:12:40.0: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:48:30.82 +05:48:30.9: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0616 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:17:12.23 +02:00:46.0: 10.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:38:22.30 +08:36:54.3: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0965 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:43:41.92 +06:37:16.7: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0940 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.75 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:07:08.33 +05:12:40.0: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1292 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:12.23 +02:00:46.0: ref_mag=10.75 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8110 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:45:11.60 +06:28:53.7: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:30:08.23 +04:52:56.1: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:45:11.60 +06:28:53.7: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:45:11.60 +06:28:53.7: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1574 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:30:08.23 +04:52:56.1: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:08.23 +04:52:56.1: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1284 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20195_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 20195_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20201_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 20201_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20229_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 20229_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20251_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 20251_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20347_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 20347_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20350_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 20350_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20356_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 20356_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20360_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 20360_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20362_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 20362_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20364_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 20364_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20366_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 20366_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20372_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 20372_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32482_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 32482_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32484_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 32484_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32485_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 32485_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32488_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 32488_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32489_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 32489_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:25:00.45 +05:59:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32491_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 32491_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:49.28 +00:53:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32492_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 32492_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32494_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 32494_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32501_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 32501_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32660_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 32660_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32676_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 32676_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32731_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 32731_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32757_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 32757_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32763_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 32763_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32766_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 32766_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32773_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 32773_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33011_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 33011_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33084_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33084_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33097_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33097_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:35:20.12 +04:06:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33235_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33235_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33251_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33251_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33269_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33269_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33313_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33313_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33329_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33329_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33330_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33330_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33331_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33331_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33335_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33335_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33339_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33339_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33360_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33360_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33361_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33361_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33362_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33362_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33368_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33368_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33379_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 33379_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33380_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33380_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33383_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33383_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33384_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33384_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33406_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33406_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:14:15.85 +01:23:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33409_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33409_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33411_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33411_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33425_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33425_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33436_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33436_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33440_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33440_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33450_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33450_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33458_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33458_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33460_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33460_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33469_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33469_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33470_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33470_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33478_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33478_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:21:24.52 +09:00:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33483_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33483_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33488_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33488_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33490_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33490_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33496_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33496_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33498_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33498_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33502_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33502_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:36.89 +00:51:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33503_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33503_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33505_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33505_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33514_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33514_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33516_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33516_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33518_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33518_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33520_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33520_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33521_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33521_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33522_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33522_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33527_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33527_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33529_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33529_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33531_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33531_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33532_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33532_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33533_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33533_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33538_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33538_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33540_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33540_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:46.51 +01:27:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33542_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33542_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33546_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33546_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33549_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33549_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33553_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33553_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33556_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33556_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33568_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33568_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33570_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33570_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33576_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33576_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33579_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33579_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33582_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33582_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33586_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33586_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33590_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33590_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33597_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33597_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33598_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33598_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33602_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33602_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33603_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33603_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33604_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33604_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33605_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33605_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33610_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33610_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33611_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33611_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33616_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33616_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33618_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33618_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33620_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33620_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33622_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33622_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33624_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33624_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33627_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33627_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33628_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33628_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33630_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33630_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33631_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33631_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33632_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33632_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33633_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33633_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33636_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33636_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33638_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33638_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33641_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33641_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33646_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33646_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33647_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33647_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33648_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33648_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33649_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33649_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33650_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33650_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33656_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33656_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33658_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33658_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33661_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33661_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33662_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33662_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33663_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33663_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:31.23 +00:54:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33664_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33664_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33666_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33666_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33671_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33671_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33672_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33672_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33674_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33674_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33675_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33675_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33677_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33677_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33678_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33678_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33680_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33680_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33682_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33682_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33683_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33683_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33684_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33684_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33687_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33687_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33690_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33690_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33695_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33695_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33699_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33699_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33700_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33700_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33702_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33702_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:19.81 +00:49:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33704_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33704_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:48:23.15 +07:19:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33708_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33708_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33711_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33711_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33712_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33712_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33714_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33714_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33716_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33716_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33718_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33718_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33721_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33721_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33723_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33723_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33724_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33724_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33725_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33725_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33726_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33726_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33731_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33731_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33735_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33735_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33736_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33736_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33739_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33739_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33743_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33743_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33750_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33750_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33752_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33752_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33757_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33757_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33758_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33758_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33760_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33760_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33761_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33761_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33767_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33767_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33768_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33768_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33770_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33770_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33772_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33772_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:34.94 +00:56:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33776_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33776_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33786_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33786_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33790_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33790_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:50.20 +01:05:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33792_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33792_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33796_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33796_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33799_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33799_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33801_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 33801_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33805_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33805_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33808_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33808_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33810_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33810_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33815_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33815_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33817_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33817_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33822_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33822_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:56:20.23 +03:18:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33825_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 33825_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33835_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33835_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:54.17 +01:26:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33839_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33839_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:15.38 +01:13:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33841_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33841_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33842_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33842_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33845_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33845_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33851_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33851_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33855_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33855_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33857_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33857_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33862_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33862_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33869_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33869_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33874_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33874_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33884_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33884_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33886_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33886_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33893_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33893_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33894_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33894_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33895_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33895_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33900_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33900_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33904_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33904_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33910_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33910_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33912_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33912_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33918_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33918_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33919_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33919_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33925_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33925_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33947_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33947_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33951_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33951_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33952_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33952_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33957_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33957_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33965_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33965_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33980_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33980_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33981_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 33981_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02075_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 02075_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03325_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 03325_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-10-12_00-50-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
