NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields LMi-01-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Reference image   2026 01 18.33373    2461058.83373    12.30    10:26:50.19 +39:57:51.9   9241 4364   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Discovery image 1   2026 02 22.24108    2461093.74108    12.32    10:26:50.20 +39:57:52.1   9243 4365   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.49750    2461324.99750    11.42    10:26:50.17 +39:57:52.6   9068 4856   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Discovery image 3   2026 10 11.49799    2461324.99799    11.32    10:26:50.11 +39:57:51.9   9065 4858   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 10 11.4977  2461324.9977  11.37  10:26:50.14 +39:57:52.3
180.30473  57.53070 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 3.3 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | Gaia DR3 756354151826393984  | 10:26:50.19 +39:57:52.1 (Gaia DR3)  | T                | P                    |  Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE                                J-Ks=0.408+/-0.030 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 10:26:50.14 +39:57:52.3:  12.30 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:26:50.14 +39:57:52.3:  12.32 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.31 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   LMi-01-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
LMi-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting LMi-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing LMi-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 502635 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 502635 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.png' -> 'transient_report/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits_preview.png'
LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits

renamed 'LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.png' -> 'transient_report/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits_preview.png'
LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 448.9815 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 551.8028 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 7236.9947 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1952.9049 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 7664.8006 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 2068.5246 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 16.1187 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.056 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-11T06:56:14.1221070' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-11T11:56:14.1221070' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61324.4973856714 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-11T11:56:24.0252309' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61324.4975002892 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 147.269558248062 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 38.0002729392669 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 49.415 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 69.2072222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.31577839473235 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'LMi-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 49 06' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29505 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29505 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 70.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.7 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 38.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.50052 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits :) Spent 0.509042 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-11T06:56:56.5175268' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-11T11:56:56.5175268' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61324.497876354 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-11T11:57:06.4207926' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61324.4979909724 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 147.269558199911 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 38.0002729698314 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 49.5513888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 69.2441666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.31311267476674 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'LMi-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 49 06' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29505 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29505 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 70.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.7 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 38.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.50052 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits :) Spent 0.506184 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits


fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461324.99750141 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:49:06.265 +38:00:05.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:49:13.631 +37:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:49:06.265 +38:00:05.29 Second-epoch image center 09:49:13.631 +37:59:59.41 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0242 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:49:15.064 +37:59:47.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:49:06.265 +38:00:05.29 Second-epoch image center 09:49:15.064 +37:59:47.49 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0293 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:49:13.631 +37:59:59.41 Second-epoch second image center 09:49:15.064 +37:59:47.49 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00575 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qmfgjsk6pm Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4ihjs6zbgv Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UUunU0M1WU Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CqWXxuAkyd Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits) and catalog (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3440 to 157.6118 deg, Dec +32.0322 to +43.3727 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3440 to 157.6118 deg, Dec 32.0322 to 43.3727 deg Loaded 5364 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3768 out of 3968 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3968 out of 7760 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.905950 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.905950 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3440 to 157.6118 deg, Dec +32.0322 to +43.3727 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3440 to 157.6118 deg, Dec 32.0322 to 43.3727 deg Loaded 5364 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3768 out of 3968 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3968 out of 7760 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 7740 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3423 to 157.6117 deg, Dec +32.0092 to +43.3728 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3423 to 157.6117 deg, Dec 32.0092 to 43.3728 deg Loaded 5378 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3732 out of 3971 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3971 out of 7740 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits 2.2 pix LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 2.7 pix fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits 2.6 pix fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits 15.7 mag. LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 12.5 mag. fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits 13.0 mag. fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.5 (SNR ) 9.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.qmfgjsk6pm (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=529, bad_region=0, passed=7760 Got 7760 stars (including 7222 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7760 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4788 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4783 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7760 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4788 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7760 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7760 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4783 stars left (next iteration limit 5261) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits N_match=4783 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.223 n_q1=1246 n_q2=1087 n_q3=1261 n_q4=1189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.352 The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.4ihjs6zbgv (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=564, bad_region=0, passed=7740 Got 7740 stars (including 7160 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7740 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4788 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4783 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7740 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4788 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7740 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7740 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4783 stars left (next iteration limit 5261) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits N_match=4783 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=1258 n_q2=1088 n_q3=1255 n_q4=1182 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194 The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.UUunU0M1WU (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=95, bad_region=0, passed=1046 Got 1046 stars (including 950 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1046 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1019 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1018 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1018 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 907 stars left (next iteration limit 998) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=907 robust_rms=15.791 arcsec worst_region_rms=21.669 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=21.669 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=907 robust_rms=0.472 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.606 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.606 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=907 robust_rms_before=1.044 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.291 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.472 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.421 worst_region_rms_after=0.606 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.117 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.606 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.421 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.421 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.291 arcsec matched=907 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits N_match=907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.282 n_q1=222 n_q2=170 n_q3=268 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.CqWXxuAkyd (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=122, bad_region=0, passed=1093 Got 1093 stars (including 969 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1093 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1069 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1070 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1070 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=931 robust_rms=14.822 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.549 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.549 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=931 robust_rms=0.413 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.664 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.664 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=931 robust_rms_before=1.037 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.276 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.413 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.438 worst_region_rms_after=0.664 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.123 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.664 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.438 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.438 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.276 arcsec matched=931 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=258 n_q2=125 n_q3=342 n_q4=206 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.544 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits sigma_overall=0.270 worst_q_ratio=1.352 ref2=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.194 new1=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits sigma_overall=0.300 worst_q_ratio=1.264 new2=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.544 reference average sigma_overall=0.3265 worst_q_ratio=1.273 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q2: 170 -> 125, 26.471% > 20%; fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits vs fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q3: 268 -> 342, 21.637% > 20%; fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits vs fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348_astrometric_residuals.png (4783 matched stars from wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236_astrometric_residuals.png (4783 matched stars from wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425_astrometric_residuals.png (907 matched stars from wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426_astrometric_residuals.png (931 matched stars from wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:49:06.265 +38:00:05.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:49:13.631 +37:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:49:06.265 +38:00:05.29 Second-epoch image center 09:49:13.631 +37:59:59.41 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0242 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:49:15.064 +37:59:47.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:49:06.265 +38:00:05.29 Second-epoch image center 09:49:15.064 +37:59:47.49 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0293 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:49:13.631 +37:59:59.41 Second-epoch second image center 09:49:15.064 +37:59:47.49 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00575 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s9lLF8r9Mm Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5j8WyikHfd Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZfLcRqVZd7 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9Eib1R551s Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits) and catalog (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 40713 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3381 to 157.6201 deg, Dec +31.9947 to +43.3861 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3381 to 157.6201 deg, Dec 31.9947 to 43.3861 deg Loaded 5394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3582 out of 3992 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 40713 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.802250 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.802250 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.94 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.86 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.86
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 40713 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3381 to 157.6201 deg, Dec +31.9947 to +43.3861 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3381 to 157.6201 deg, Dec 31.9947 to 43.3861 deg Loaded 5394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3582 out of 3992 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 40713 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits (aperture=4.9) Read 40745 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3384 to 157.6207 deg, Dec +31.9963 to +43.3847 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3384 to 157.6207 deg, Dec 31.9963 to 43.3847 deg Loaded 5394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3546 out of 3992 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 40745 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (aperture=5.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 20 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits 2.0 pix LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 2.5 pix fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits 2.5 pix fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.9 mag. LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits 15.8 mag. LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 12.6 mag. fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits 12.8 mag. fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.6 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.s9lLF8r9Mm (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1871, bad_region=1, passed=40697 Got 40697 stars (including 38757 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40697 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40697 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40697 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40697 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4786 stars left (next iteration limit 5264) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits N_match=4786 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.217 n_q1=1238 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1263 n_q4=1194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.335 The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.5j8WyikHfd (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1991, bad_region=9, passed=40726 Got 40726 stars (including 38641 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40726 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40726 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40726 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40726 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4786 stars left (next iteration limit 5264) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits N_match=4786 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=1243 n_q2=1093 n_q3=1247 n_q4=1203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216 The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.ZfLcRqVZd7 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=140, bad_region=3, passed=6619 Got 6619 stars (including 6460 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6619 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4781 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4774 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6619 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4780 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6619 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6619 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67" Excluding outliers - 4773 stars left (next iteration limit 5251) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=14.656 arcsec worst_region_rms=23.828 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=23.828 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.835 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.009 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.009 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.692 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.918 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.777 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4773 robust_rms_before=1.235 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.714 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.692 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.957 worst_region_rms_after=0.918 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.291 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.777 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.957 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.957 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.714 arcsec matched=4773 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits N_match=4773 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.832 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.645 n_q1=1221 n_q2=884 n_q3=1469 n_q4=1199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.340 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.9Eib1R551s (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=173, bad_region=2, passed=7098 Got 7098 stars (including 6912 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7098 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4784 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4779 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7097 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4785 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7097 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7097 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62" Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5258) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=11.847 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.750 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.750 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.753 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.026 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.026 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.640 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.843 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.779 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4779 robust_rms_before=1.209 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.653 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.640 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.866 worst_region_rms_after=0.843 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.291 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.779 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.866 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.866 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.653 arcsec matched=4779 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.753 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.600 n_q1=1357 n_q2=689 n_q3=1763 n_q4=970 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.321 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 09:17:28.99 +42:40:33.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-00-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits at 10:26:50.14 +39:57:52.3: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:17:28.99 +42:40:33.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:17:28.99 +42:40:33.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:26:50.14 +39:57:52.3: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:26:50.14 +39:57:52.3: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3773 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out28112.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52716_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 The candidate 52716_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 10 11.49750    2461324.99750    9.94    09:17:28.99 +42:40:33.4   1086 5985   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.49799    2461324.99799    10.06    09:17:28.99 +42:40:33.1   1083 5987   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52734_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 The candidate 52734_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.49799    2461324.99799    10.18    09:43:09.74 +39:22:15.5   4035 3987   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52737_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 The candidate 52737_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.49799    2461324.99799    9.82    10:17:03.44 +40:43:16.1   7869 5142   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52760_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 The candidate 52760_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.49799    2461324.99799    10.51    09:40:35.39 +39:54:12.5   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52793_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 The candidate 52793_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.49799    2461324.99799    11.07    09:35:05.35 +40:23:40.0   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52800_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 The candidate 52800_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.49799    2461324.99799    10.42    10:06:52.85 +33:53:53.4   7134 0898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52805_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 The candidate 52805_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.49799    2461324.99799    10.58    09:50:18.51 +33:38:33.7   5070 0580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52831_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 The candidate 52831_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.49799    2461324.99799    10.83    10:15:44.72 +34:39:13.9   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52847_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 The candidate 52847_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.49799    2461324.99799    11.15    10:02:12.11 +40:09:03.0   6203 4602   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52867_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 The candidate 52867_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.49799    2461324.99799    11.54    09:45:59.21 +42:29:36.0   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52903_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 The candidate 52903_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.49799    2461324.99799    11.63    09:18:36.94 +36:47:43.7   1121 2411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits **** FOUND 09:18:36.89 +36:47:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52937_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 The candidate 52937_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.49799    2461324.99799    11.98    09:43:19.38 +40:56:34.2   4015 4935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52957_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 The candidate 52957_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.49799    2461324.99799    11.12    10:20:07.73 +33:53:21.2   8801 1083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53039_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 The candidate 53039_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.49799    2461324.99799    12.06    10:02:44.22 +36:02:17.9   6494 2139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53047_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 The candidate 53047_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.49799    2461324.99799    12.42    09:28:04.74 +39:50:12.5   2275 4236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53068_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 The candidate 53068_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.49799    2461324.99799    12.11    09:51:35.59 +35:33:58.1   5158 1751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 04477_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 The candidate 04477_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 11.49799    2461324.99799    6.68    10:24:22.01 +34:10:35.9   9310 1329   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits **** FOUND 10:24:22.00 +34:10:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 28112_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 Preparing report for the candidate 28112_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 06221_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 The candidate 06221_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 11.49799    2461324.99799    8.04    09:45:34.30 +34:30:44.5   4451 1075   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits **** FOUND 09:45:34.30 +34:30:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 02769_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 The candidate 02769_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 11.49799    2461324.99799    6.47    10:24:08.47 +33:43:07.6   9325 1048   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_070004_TTUQ1b1x1_1231141_jkOUsUFz/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_06-56-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0426.fits **** FOUND 10:24:08.45 +33:43:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 15s Prepared the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 10:26:50.14 +39:57:52.3 ########### Completed LMi-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 10:26:50.14 +39:57:52.3 ################################################################################### 10:26:50.14 +39:57:52.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 10:26:50.14 +39:57:52.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 10:26:50.14 +39:57:52.3 -- not a known variable star Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 10:26:50.14 +39:57:52.3 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461324.99750141 -observatory V36 14:37:49.28 -18:22:29.1 Mercury (0.0mag) 14:07:14.12 -20:55:31.2 Venus (-4.5mag) 08:40:10.06 +19:36:04.2 Mars (1.0mag) 09:34:25.83 +15:05:02.6 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:42:24.81 +01:36:43.4 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:12:04.17 +20:57:56.3 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:10:20.07 -00:25:40.9 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:10.77 -23:43:30.2 Pluto (14.5mag) 13:39:49.00 -15:12:18.5 Moon (-8.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Oct 11 07:02 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461324.99750141: 09:34:20.08 +15:05:34.9 Io (6.1mag) 09:34:36.32 +15:04:05.3 Europa (6.2mag) 09:34:41.24 +15:03:38.2 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:34:02.38 +15:07:10.0 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:34:10.85 +15:25:31.2 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:34:25.05 +15:05:07.3 Thebe (16.4mag) 09:33:00.82 +15:26:43.3 Elara (17.5mag) 09:36:51.66 +14:27:52.9 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:33:01.56 +15:32:08.7 Carme (18.8mag) 00:42:11.43 +01:36:54.9 Titan (8.2mag) 00:42:27.50 +01:36:39.7 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:41:54.34 +01:33:56.5 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:42:09.27 +01:36:33.8 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:40:44.21 +01:24:24.0 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 11 07:02 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461324.99750141: 02:48:49.76 +21:19:45.5 JWST 17:31:21.14 +36:53:34.2 Chandra 14:46:16.27 -60:47:45.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 11 07:02 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461324.99750141 -observatory V36 03:46:06.33 +20:11:56.7 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:24:48.89 -33:29:39.3 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:39:51.48 -72:24:33.9 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:15:51.14 +34:39:13.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 07:30:13.65 +25:27:26.2 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:01:59.68 +35:40:47.3 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:26:47.31 +41:31:14.8 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:46:12.19 -13:35:29.0 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:17:17.88 +15:59:08.4 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:51:05.69 -02:43:46.4 16.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:43:04.17 +65:10:31.7 15.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:36:00.12 +43:16:23.0 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:45:45.89 +14:16:19.0 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:29:21.15 -21:15:43.3 12.9mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 00:26:44.97 +18:58:53.5 17.6mag 2P/Encke 22:58:23.65 -31:40:20.2 14.5mag 10P/Tempel 02:10:55.61 +38:43:10.8 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:11:18.45 -08:10:18.4 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:22:21.14 -08:52:27.5 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 07:35:55.83 +15:59:59.3 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 02:59:57.17 +14:20:09.6 17.6mag 88P/Howell 07:39:20.81 +40:16:49.7 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:02:54.20 +14:06:30.7 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:41:14.67 +13:14:10.4 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 14:06:59.12 -32:14:49.0 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos 06:50:54.72 +19:18:14.7 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 21:38:34.92 +03:31:36.9 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:18:45.69 +01:37:34.8 14.3mag 169P/NEAT 03:29:16.16 +04:35:05.7 14.8mag 220P/McNaught 06:03:38.36 +45:14:37.3 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 07:27:46.97 +25:36:55.4 17.9mag 266P/Christensen 09:56:20.99 +31:37:13.5 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.6K Oct 11 07:02 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 05:39:14.97 +51:06:11.70 ASASSN-26fk 2026-10-5.53 -3.9 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 11 07:02 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 11 07:02 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 22:00:29.980 +18:33:24.69 AT 2026acyi 2026-08-31.60 21.38 01:44:56.733 +00:38:32.49 AT 2026acyh 2026-09-21.88 22.21 01:45:25.068 +03:43:05.31 AT 2026acyg 2026-09-12.91 22.32 23:02:48.800 +03:40:01.33 AT 2026acyf 2026-08-31.80 21.75 05:44:27.090 +33:39:00.48 AT 2026acye 2026-09-25.43 18.62 06:12:59.365 -58:12:49.41 AT 2026acyd 2026-09-25.74 18.37 06:44:13.801 +10:23:30.61 AT 2026acyc 2026-09-24.45 17.58 21:50:55.698 -02:51:50.17 SN 2026acyb 2026-09-20.25 19.4497 17:12:55.487 +34:28:22.84 SN 2026acya 2026-09-22.17 19.6988 18:28:46.287 +43:53:39.30 AT 2026acxz 2026-09-22.18 19.7418 18:50:25.837 +51:48:48.31 AT 2026acxy 2026-09-26.14 19.507 17:29:04.550 +70:58:39.69 AT 2026acxx 2026-09-18.17 19.9857 18:36:38.362 +53:14:52.16 AT 2026acxw 2026-09-22.17 19.6863 03:16:13.837 +33:07:04.16 AT 2026acxv 2026-09-24.50 20.55 05:52:14.054 +15:53:08.19 AT 2026acxu 2026-09-22.43 20.8781 08:02:21.458 +24:05:52.06 AT 2026acxt 2026-09-24.51 19.9945 08:26:53.421 +00:01:31.92 AT 2026acxs 2026-09-24.52 18.9046 08:04:09.422 +26:03:07.21 AT 2026acxr 2026-09-16.52 20.3455 09:49:29.452 +22:28:47.85 AT 2026acxq 2026-09-24.52 18.9887 10:39:38.343 +25:39:08.54 AT 2026acxp 2026-09-24.53 18.7327 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 11 07:02 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 103 C - WARNING