fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits
fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 10 11.49162 | 2461324.99162 | 14.49 | 11:29:37.39 +58:12:20.6 | 2314 1092 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.49208 | 2461324.99208 | 14.37 | 11:29:36.93 +58:12:12.5 | 2314 1092 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 10 11.4918 2461324.9918 14.43 11:29:37.16 +58:12:16.6
142.04543 55.78303 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.9" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:29:37.16 +58:12:16.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:29:37.16 +58:12:16.6: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:29:37.16 +58:12:16.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242 STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: UMa-04-Q2b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting UMa-04-Q2b1x1 ########### Processing UMa-04-Q2b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 506798 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 506798 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits_preview.png'
UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits
renamed 'UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits_preview.png'
UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 482.7200 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 528.8252 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2103.0082 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 665.5845 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2166.7959 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 599.3190 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.35658 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.111 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.8700008392334 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-11T06:47:45.5455484' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-11T11:47:45.5455484' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61324.4914993634 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-11T11:47:55.4497501' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61324.491613993 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.999464412932 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 61.9997319256369 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 31.5172222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 33.4688888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.90808524699193 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20704 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20704 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.8700008392334 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.8700008392334 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 70.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.8 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 31.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.800544 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/d_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits :) Spent 0.552427 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/d_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.8500003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-11T06:48:25.8155212' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-11T11:48:25.8155212' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61324.4919654513 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-11T11:48:35.7174188' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61324.492080058 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.999464393918 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 61.9997319693596 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 31.5938888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 33.4905555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.90396173676867 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20704 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20704 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.8500003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.8500003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 70.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.8 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 31.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.800544 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/d_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits :) Spent 0.533693 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/d_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits
fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461324.99161510 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits Image size: 937.8'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:02.982 +61:59:44.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 Second-epoch image center 12:00:02.982 +61:59:44.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0109 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Image size: 937.8'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:02.369 +61:59:33.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 Second-epoch image center 12:00:02.369 +61:59:33.12 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0142 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:02.982 +61:59:44.37 Second-epoch second image center 12:00:02.369 +61:59:33.12 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00335 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SVLjgnnXbn Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hwnhdSWDOX Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pzkihvYvT9 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OOLGV0Q3fG Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec +55.2640 to +67.4533 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec 55.2640 to 67.4533 deg Loaded 6574 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3976 out of 4191 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4191 out of 7332 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.890400 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.890400 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec +55.2640 to +67.4533 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec 55.2640 to 67.4533 deg Loaded 6574 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3976 out of 4191 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4191 out of 7332 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (aperture=6.3) Read 7282 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9723 to 198.4317 deg, Dec +55.3313 to +67.4947 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9723 to 198.4317 deg, Dec 55.3313 to 67.4947 deg Loaded 6542 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3979 out of 4176 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4176 out of 7282 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 2.2 pix UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 15.6 mag. UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 14.6 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits 14.4 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.SVLjgnnXbn (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, bad_region=1672, passed=7332 Got 7332 stars (including 5274 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6037 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6037 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6037 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.345 n_q1=1452 n_q2=848 n_q3=1641 n_q4=954 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.173 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.hwnhdSWDOX (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=494, bad_region=1659, passed=7282 Got 7282 stars (including 5242 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7282 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5987 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5987 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5987 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=1451 n_q2=838 n_q3=1650 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.pzkihvYvT9 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=224, bad_region=122, passed=2331 Got 2331 stars (including 2014 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2331 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1970 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2215 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2215 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2215 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 1972 stars left (next iteration limit 2169) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: the 1972 catalog matches do not cover the frame (751/48/825/348 per quadrant, need 123 in each) - keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits N_match=1972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.653 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=751 n_q2=48 n_q3=825 n_q4=348 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.700 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.OOLGV0Q3fG (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=178, bad_region=85, passed=2247 Got 2247 stars (including 1990 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2247 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1942 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2187 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2187 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2187 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 1943 stars left (next iteration limit 2137) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1943 robust_rms=6.318 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.754 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=8.276 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1943 robust_rms=0.642 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.738 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.694 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1943 robust_rms=0.387 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.549 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.445 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1943 robust_rms_before=1.109 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.357 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.387 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.476 worst_region_rms_after=0.549 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.816 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.445 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.476 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.476 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.357 arcsec matched=1943 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits N_match=1943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=637 n_q2=137 n_q3=804 n_q4=365 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.173 ref2=UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits sigma_overall=0.417 worst_q_ratio=1.152 new1=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits sigma_overall=0.384 worst_q_ratio=1.700 new2=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.246 reference average sigma_overall=0.4 worst_q_ratio=1.1625 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q2: 48 -> 137, 64.964% > 20%; fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits vs fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279_astrometric_residuals.png (4898 matched stars from wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429_astrometric_residuals.png (1972 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430_astrometric_residuals.png (1943 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits Image size: 937.8'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:02.982 +61:59:44.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 Second-epoch image center 12:00:02.982 +61:59:44.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0109 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Image size: 937.8'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:02.369 +61:59:33.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 Second-epoch image center 12:00:02.369 +61:59:33.12 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0142 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:02.982 +61:59:44.37 Second-epoch second image center 12:00:02.369 +61:59:33.12 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00335 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6EfN5dV4Le Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8pGVK1E7ZJ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4O2Ari9faU Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sW1BO7uVkT Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 37333 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec +55.2253 to +67.4860 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec 55.2253 to 67.4860 deg Loaded 6642 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4194 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4194 out of 37333 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.782200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.782200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.97 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.81 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.81
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 37333 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec +55.2253 to +67.4860 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec 55.2253 to 67.4860 deg Loaded 6642 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4194 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4194 out of 37333 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (aperture=5.0) Read 37494 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9724 to 198.6777 deg, Dec +55.2649 to +67.4946 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9724 to 198.6777 deg, Dec 55.2649 to 67.4946 deg Loaded 6625 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4189 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4189 out of 37494 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (aperture=5.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 82 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 2.1 pix UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 2.1 pix fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits 2.1 pix fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.8 mag. UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 15.8 mag. UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 14.8 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits 14.6 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.6EfN5dV4Le (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1765, bad_region=7377, passed=37316 Got 37316 stars (including 28488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37316 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31483 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31483 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31483 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=1449 n_q2=842 n_q3=1676 n_q4=932 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.8pGVK1E7ZJ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1739, bad_region=7420, passed=37478 Got 37478 stars (including 28617 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37478 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31620 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31620 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31620 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.362 n_q1=1448 n_q2=847 n_q3=1676 n_q4=929 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.4O2Ari9faU (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=556, bad_region=451, passed=15114 Got 15114 stars (including 14130 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15114 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14768 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14768 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14768 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 4850 stars left (next iteration limit 5335) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: the 4850 catalog matches do not cover the frame (1837/162/1966/885 per quadrant, need 303 in each) - keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits N_match=4850 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.368 n_q1=1837 n_q2=162 n_q3=1966 n_q4=885 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.432 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.sW1BO7uVkT (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=512, bad_region=561, passed=14704 Got 14704 stars (including 13642 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14704 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4849 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14433 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14433 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14433 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 4851 stars left (next iteration limit 5335) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=6.148 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.637 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.021 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=0.698 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.852 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.852 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=0.455 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.586 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.586 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4851 robust_rms_before=1.152 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.416 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.455 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.583 worst_region_rms_after=0.586 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.084 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.586 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.583 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.583 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.416 arcsec matched=4851 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits N_match=4851 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=1643 n_q2=389 n_q3=1909 n_q4=910 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:52:05.16 +62:26:32.0: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:52:05.16 +62:26:32.0: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:52:05.16 +62:26:32.0: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1996 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:29:37.16 +58:12:16.6: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:29:37.16 +58:12:16.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52795.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52067_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52067_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks**** FOUND 12:18:38.40 +63:15:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52071_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52071_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 14.14 12:18:38.31 +63:15:53.0 6070 3981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits **** FOUND 11:28:34.52 +60:31:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52074_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52074_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.65 11:28:34.40 +60:31:57.4 2436 2505 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Discovery image 1 2026 10 11.49162 2461324.99162 13.28 11:52:05.15 +62:26:32.2 4240 3486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-47-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0429.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52075_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52075_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.11 11:52:05.16 +62:26:31.8 4240 3488 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits **** FOUND 12:02:21.30 +63:30:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52117_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52117_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.03 12:02:21.41 +63:30:10.0 4966 4105 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52122_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52122_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 10.49 12:33:37.51 +59:43:01.6 7319 1924 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52134_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52134_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 10.64 11:47:07.84 +61:59:12.6 3875 3235 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52136_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52136_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 10.86 11:09:32.10 +60:05:06.1 0970 2491 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52148_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52148_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 10.92 12:30:33.70 +59:07:50.1 7119 1546 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52162_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52162_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 11.19 11:13:41.63 +57:19:31.2 0940 0773 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52166_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52166_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 11.42 11:06:43.13 +62:29:19.6 1093 3964 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52174_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52174_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 11.48 12:27:38.48 +58:13:50.3 6939 0981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52175_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52175_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 11.58 11:08:31.52 +58:43:49.7 0711 1700 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52180_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52180_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 11.58 11:04:54.34 +64:07:36.7 1201 4964 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52240_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52240_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 11.75 11:50:49.41 +61:05:42.4 4105 2680 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52245_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52245_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 12.39 11:50:03.68 +60:18:04.2 4020 2204 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52247_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52247_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 12.39 11:05:10.64 +59:54:59.8 0620 2464 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52251_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52251_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 12.40 11:11:37.43 +65:13:57.9 1779 5522 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52265_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52265_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 12.41 11:39:56.01 +61:23:43.4 3330 2923 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52266_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52266_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 12.52 12:33:38.45 +65:26:12.8 6950 5374 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52267_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52267_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 12.56 11:08:50.47 +65:08:17.7 1592 5505 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52280_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52280_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 12.62 11:24:22.44 +57:52:22.4 1865 0953 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52305_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52305_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 12.43 11:19:23.92 +63:21:44.9 2065 4304 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52311_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52311_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 12.68 11:10:53.75 +65:37:41.5 1784 5768 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52320_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52320_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 12.86 11:53:53.43 +65:55:57.7 4464 5593 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52323_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52323_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 12.64 11:19:04.74 +63:25:52.4 2051 4349 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52335_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52335_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 12.84 11:48:28.05 +66:00:56.5 4133 5663 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52339_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52339_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 12.85 11:27:04.52 +57:48:32.2 2076 0882 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52343_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52343_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.05 11:14:26.67 +59:32:37.6 1272 2092 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52350_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52350_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 12.88 11:17:42.66 +59:43:45.3 1542 2156 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52358_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52358_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.07 11:23:49.65 +62:05:14.6 2238 3489 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52361_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52361_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.06 11:25:41.98 +62:45:50.2 2433 3873 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52362_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52362_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.13 11:40:38.38 +66:00:32.8 3652 5700 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52369_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52369_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 12.85 11:05:39.43 +63:46:39.3 1201 4745 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52373_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52373_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 12.97 11:20:04.79 +64:35:01.5 2241 5026 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52386_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52386_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.01 11:47:27.24 +61:20:21.6 3870 2843 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52390_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52390_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.02 11:13:49.19 +62:11:06.6 1547 3676 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52400_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52400_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.17 11:08:03.97 +64:48:05.7 1498 5316 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52401_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52401_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.10 11:27:56.69 +59:42:20.1 2316 2015 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52424_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52424_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.23 11:16:56.47 +65:21:56.7 2128 5532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52430_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52430_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 12.99 12:29:57.35 +61:26:54.8 6941 2942 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52434_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52434_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.08 11:52:52.93 +59:11:33.7 4197 1522 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52439_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52439_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.12 11:42:27.19 +58:05:49.7 3330 0914 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52457_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52457_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.13 11:40:29.17 +57:42:56.9 3150 0697 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52465_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52465_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.35 11:02:12.32 +63:23:10.5 0915 4570 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52471_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52471_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.45 11:04:41.20 +60:36:59.4 0684 2888 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52481_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52481_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.40 11:12:48.93 +58:51:30.6 1062 1707 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52485_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52485_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.45 12:21:34.65 +62:55:40.9 6282 3789 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52490_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52490_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.75 11:57:49.06 +64:39:10.0 4682 4807 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52492_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52492_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.62 12:19:33.62 +63:38:04.7 6121 4208 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52497_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52497_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.47 11:07:45.24 +63:00:55.3 1236 4260 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52498_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52498_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.51 11:21:46.63 +61:37:56.2 2047 3241 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52499_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52499_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.45 11:45:43.25 +58:00:42.3 3587 0841 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52503_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52503_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.13 12:24:06.66 +62:27:40.6 6476 3519 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52520_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52520_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.18 12:08:23.38 +64:59:15.8 5364 5003 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52525_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52525_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.32 12:29:09.22 +64:07:52.3 6738 4555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52526_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52526_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.39 11:09:03.18 +64:49:33.3 1564 5316 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52546_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52546_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.43 11:47:49.67 +65:32:46.4 4074 5381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52554_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52554_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.26 11:10:21.93 +63:59:38.9 1540 4802 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52556_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52556_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.65 11:13:36.96 +63:06:45.3 1646 4231 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52568_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52568_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.90 11:32:43.26 +62:17:10.8 2879 3517 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52580_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52580_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.78 11:28:36.05 +59:43:50.2 2368 2023 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52588_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52588_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.61 11:40:11.91 +57:55:59.5 3140 0831 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52598_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52598_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.42 11:20:12.04 +63:49:26.1 2168 4570 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52634_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52634_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.79 11:28:10.22 +65:22:30.3 2832 5415 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52636_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52636_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.61 12:30:07.55 +64:17:35.9 6793 4659 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits **** FOUND 11:46:30.29 +61:30:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52640_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52640_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.81 11:46:30.32 +61:30:37.4 3809 2951 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52651_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52651_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 14.00 11:32:43.57 +61:17:49.3 2803 2923 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52677_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52677_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.54 12:19:49.94 +61:39:51.3 6203 3019 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52684_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52684_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 14.27 11:29:02.57 +61:09:27.7 2525 2875 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits **** FOUND 11:59:58.94 +59:05:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52689_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52689_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.86 11:59:58.91 +59:05:43.0 4745 1443 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52697_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52697_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.95 11:40:21.32 +58:51:05.6 3208 1386 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52707_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52707_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.91 11:13:42.89 +62:41:17.7 1601 3977 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits **** FOUND 11:56:12.83 +61:00:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52725_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52725_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.72 11:56:12.82 +61:00:04.1 4496 2605 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52729_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52729_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.95 11:03:06.82 +65:26:40.2 1277 5774 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52771_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52771_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 13.77 12:00:58.31 +61:27:12.1 4849 2868 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits **** FOUND 11:47:43.69 +58:44:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52783_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52783_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 14.09 11:47:43.68 +58:44:25.5 3779 1272 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52789_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52789_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 14.39 12:21:58.32 +63:03:55.7 6304 3874 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52794_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52794_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 14.23 12:19:24.96 +62:22:45.4 6151 3449 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52795_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 Preparing report for the candidate 52795_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52799_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 52799_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 14.08 11:53:49.23 +64:52:49.6 4430 4955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 28434_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 The candidate 28434_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 14.25 11:58:50.66 +63:21:30.0 4727 4022 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 16s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 11:29:37.16 +58:12:16.6 ########### Completed UMa-04-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 11:29:37.16 +58:12:16.6 ################################################################################### 11:29:37.16 +58:12:16.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 11:29:37.16 +58:12:16.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 11:29:37.16 +58:12:16.6 -- not a known variable star Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 11:29:37.16 +58:12:16.6 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461324.99161510 -observatory V36 14:37:47.86 -18:22:20.8 Mercury (0.0mag) 14:07:14.54 -20:55:33.2 Venus (-4.5mag) 08:40:09.25 +19:36:06.8 Mars (1.0mag) 09:34:25.60 +15:05:03.7 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:42:24.91 +01:36:44.0 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:12:04.21 +20:57:56.4 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:10:20.11 -00:25:40.7 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:10.77 -23:43:30.2 Pluto (14.5mag) 13:39:29.35 -15:10:04.5 Moon (-8.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Oct 11 06:52 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461324.99161510: 09:34:19.85 +15:05:35.9 Io (6.1mag) 09:34:36.06 +15:04:06.5 Europa (6.2mag) 09:34:40.98 +15:03:39.4 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:34:02.12 +15:07:11.2 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:34:10.60 +15:25:32.3 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:34:24.66 +15:05:09.2 Thebe (16.4mag) 09:33:00.58 +15:26:44.3 Elara (17.5mag) 09:36:51.46 +14:27:53.9 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:33:01.36 +15:32:09.7 Carme (18.8mag) 00:42:11.54 +01:36:55.6 Titan (8.2mag) 00:42:27.63 +01:36:40.3 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:41:54.43 +01:33:57.1 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:42:09.37 +01:36:34.4 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:40:44.32 +01:24:24.7 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 11 06:53 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461324.99161510: 02:48:48.82 +21:19:54.3 JWST 17:30:23.91 +37:00:13.6 Chandra 14:41:13.25 -60:58:07.2 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 11 06:52 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461324.99161510 -observatory V36 03:46:06.44 +20:11:56.7 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:24:48.57 -33:29:39.8 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:39:51.34 -72:24:32.5 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:15:51.18 +34:39:13.1 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 07:30:13.52 +25:27:26.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:01:59.51 +35:40:45.0 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:26:47.23 +41:31:15.7 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:46:12.18 -13:35:28.7 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:17:17.22 +15:59:10.1 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:51:05.33 -02:43:44.6 16.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:43:02.69 +65:10:40.2 15.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:36:00.53 +43:16:26.1 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:45:45.55 +14:16:16.8 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:29:21.02 -21:14:12.6 12.9mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 00:26:45.84 +18:58:56.7 17.6mag 2P/Encke 22:58:23.25 -31:40:25.0 14.5mag 10P/Tempel 02:10:55.14 +38:43:14.6 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:11:18.22 -08:10:16.6 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:22:21.37 -08:52:26.9 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 07:35:55.37 +16:00:01.5 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 02:59:57.53 +14:20:10.6 17.6mag 88P/Howell 07:39:19.54 +40:16:43.6 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:02:53.38 +14:06:38.2 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:41:13.95 +13:14:15.2 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 14:06:58.23 -32:14:43.0 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos 06:50:54.48 +19:18:15.7 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 21:38:37.90 +03:31:19.6 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:18:44.82 +01:37:39.8 14.3mag 169P/NEAT 03:29:16.36 +04:35:08.4 14.8mag 220P/McNaught 06:03:37.85 +45:14:32.7 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 07:27:46.47 +25:36:55.9 17.9mag 266P/Christensen 09:56:20.64 +31:37:14.7 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.6K Oct 11 06:52 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 05:39:14.97 +51:06:11.70 ASASSN-26fk 2026-10-5.53 -3.9 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 11 06:52 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 11 06:52 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 22:00:29.980 +18:33:24.69 AT 2026acyi 2026-08-31.60 21.38 01:44:56.733 +00:38:32.49 AT 2026acyh 2026-09-21.88 22.21 01:45:25.068 +03:43:05.31 AT 2026acyg 2026-09-12.91 22.32 23:02:48.800 +03:40:01.33 AT 2026acyf 2026-08-31.80 21.75 05:44:27.090 +33:39:00.48 AT 2026acye 2026-09-25.43 18.62 06:12:59.365 -58:12:49.41 AT 2026acyd 2026-09-25.74 18.37 06:44:13.801 +10:23:30.61 AT 2026acyc 2026-09-24.45 17.58 21:50:55.698 -02:51:50.17 SN 2026acyb 2026-09-20.25 19.4497 17:12:55.487 +34:28:22.84 SN 2026acya 2026-09-22.17 19.6988 18:28:46.287 +43:53:39.30 AT 2026acxz 2026-09-22.18 19.7418 18:50:25.837 +51:48:48.31 AT 2026acxy 2026-09-26.14 19.507 17:29:04.550 +70:58:39.69 AT 2026acxx 2026-09-18.17 19.9857 18:36:38.362 +53:14:52.16 AT 2026acxw 2026-09-22.17 19.6863 03:16:13.837 +33:07:04.16 AT 2026acxv 2026-09-24.50 20.55 05:52:14.054 +15:53:08.19 AT 2026acxu 2026-09-22.43 20.8781 08:02:21.458 +24:05:52.06 AT 2026acxt 2026-09-24.51 19.9945 08:26:53.421 +00:01:31.92 AT 2026acxs 2026-09-24.52 18.9046 08:04:09.422 +26:03:07.21 AT 2026acxr 2026-09-16.52 20.3455 09:49:29.452 +22:28:47.85 AT 2026acxq 2026-09-24.52 18.9887 10:39:38.343 +25:39:08.54 AT 2026acxp 2026-09-24.53 18.7327 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 11 06:52 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 3 2026 10 11.49208 2461324.99208 12.16 11:26:54.40 +65:38:32.0 2777 5588 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_065031_TTUQ2b1x1_921593_TQxSMQb5/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-48-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0430.fits
