######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Cam-06-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-06-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 516197 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 516197 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits_preview.png'
Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits

renamed 'Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits_preview.png'
Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 616.4114
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 635.9258
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1450.1286
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 334.1987
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1438.4565
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 352.9589
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.35253
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.053
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 16.8099994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-11T06:29:09.3959031' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-11T11:29:09.3959031' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61324.4785809605 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-11T11:29:19.2999800' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61324.47869559 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 71.9999491627043 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 69.9997628338459 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 52.4166666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 350.180833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.26110296575795 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 48 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20704 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20704 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.8099994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.8099994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 69.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.39 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 43.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 14.801184 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 10.100808 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/d_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits :)
Spent 0.629235 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/d_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 16.8299999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-11T06:30:03.7554815' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-11T11:30:03.7554815' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61324.4792101271 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-11T11:30:13.6566408' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61324.4793247222 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 71.9999489886114 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 69.9997628126912 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 52.3844444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 350.066388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.26164770527784 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 48 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20704 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20704 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.8299999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.8299999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 69.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.39 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 43.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 14.801184 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 10.100808 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/d_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits :)
Spent 0.648840 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/d_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits

fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461324.97869670
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:05.567 +69:58:35.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89
Second-epoch image center 04:48:05.567 +69:58:35.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0228 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:07.741 +69:58:14.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89
Second-epoch image center 04:48:07.741 +69:58:14.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0294 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:48:05.567 +69:58:35.80
Second-epoch second image center 04:48:07.741 +69:58:14.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00671 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J5TZFMPVnN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pDtEIWoU8e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P3JhJz2mZh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fCoMl7Jrw0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.6909 to 100.4589 deg, Dec +62.8762 to +75.4796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.6909 to 100.4589 deg, Dec 62.8762 to 75.4796 deg
Loaded 14362 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7657 out of 8219 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8219 out of 14898 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.834600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.834600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.6909 to 100.4589 deg, Dec +62.8762 to +75.4796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.6909 to 100.4589 deg, Dec 62.8762 to 75.4796 deg
Loaded 14362 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7657 out of 8219 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8219 out of 14898 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 14971 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.9862 to 100.4595 deg, Dec +62.8761 to +75.4908 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.9862 to 100.4595 deg, Dec 62.8761 to 75.4908 deg
Loaded 14321 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7671 out of 8229 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8229 out of 14971 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
2.1 pix Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
15.5 mag. Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.9 (SNR ) 10.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.J5TZFMPVnN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1217, bad_region=3282, passed=14898
Got 14898 stars (including 10612 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=1447 n_q2=1010 n_q3=1615 n_q4=837 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.208
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pDtEIWoU8e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1204, bad_region=3285, passed=14971
Got 14971 stars (including 10710 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14971 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4913 stars left (next iteration limit 5404)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=4913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1457 n_q2=1013 n_q3=1611 n_q4=832 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.P3JhJz2mZh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=121, bad_region=497, passed=2767
Got 2767 stars (including 2172 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2767 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2132 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2125 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2125 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2125 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2133 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2125 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2125 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 2125 stars left (next iteration limit 2337)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2125 robust_rms=7.131 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.174 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=8.675 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2125 robust_rms=0.706 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.898 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.898 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2125 robust_rms=0.447 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.575 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.575 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2125 robust_rms_before=1.194 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.510 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.447 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.699 worst_region_rms_after=0.575 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.705 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.575
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:05.771 +69:58:35.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 2767 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3654754.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.194 -> 0.447 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 2125 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2051 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 2051 pairs (2125 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2051 robust_rms=7.101 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.969 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=8.730 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2051 robust_rms=0.699 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.872 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.852 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2051 robust_rms=0.444 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.579 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.579 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2051 robust_rms_before=0.446 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.446 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.444 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.578 worst_region_rms_after=0.579 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.578 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.579
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.579 vs 0.578 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2051 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2051 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits N_match=2051 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.474 n_q1=886 n_q2=329 n_q3=607 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fCoMl7Jrw0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=152, bad_region=883, passed=3111
Got 3111 stars (including 2128 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3111 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2084 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2074 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2074 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2392 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2085 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2074 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2392 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2074 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2392 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 2074 stars left (next iteration limit 2281)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2074 robust_rms=8.045 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.612 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.612 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2074 robust_rms=0.726 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.080 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.080 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2074 robust_rms=0.466 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.622 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.622 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2074 robust_rms_before=1.293 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.498 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.466 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.699 worst_region_rms_after=0.622 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.136 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.622
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:07.934 +69:58:13.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 3111 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3654745.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.293 -> 0.466 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 2074 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2004 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 2004 pairs (2074 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2004 robust_rms=8.024 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.400 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.400 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2004 robust_rms=0.718 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.045 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.045 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2004 robust_rms=0.462 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.607 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.607 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2004 robust_rms_before=0.463 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.463 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.462 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.604 worst_region_rms_after=0.607 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.604 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.607
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.607 vs 0.604 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2004 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2392 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2004 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits N_match=2004 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.601 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.456 n_q1=507 n_q2=339 n_q3=658 n_q4=500 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.208
ref2=Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits sigma_overall=0.385 worst_q_ratio=1.185
new1=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits sigma_overall=0.432 worst_q_ratio=1.262
new2=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits sigma_overall=0.473 worst_q_ratio=1.271
reference average sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.1965
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q1: 886 -> 507, 42.777% > 20%; fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits vs fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q4: 229 -> 500, 54.200% > 20%; fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits vs fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257_astrometric_residuals.png (4909 matched stars from wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (4913 matched stars from wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411_astrometric_residuals.png (2051 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412_astrometric_residuals.png (2004 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:05.771 +69:58:35.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89
Second-epoch image center 04:48:05.771 +69:58:35.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0231 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:07.934 +69:58:13.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:48:00.629 +69:59:53.89
Second-epoch image center 04:48:07.934 +69:58:13.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0297 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:48:05.771 +69:58:35.17
Second-epoch second image center 04:48:07.934 +69:58:13.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00671 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3b7MByRzqh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QV6vuJx19J
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dxx30fWMwi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aNR7yxUUZ4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 107757 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.6881 to 100.4589 deg, Dec +62.8211 to +75.4976 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.6881 to 100.4589 deg, Dec 62.8211 to 75.4976 deg
Loaded 14469 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6735 out of 8427 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8427 out of 107757 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.687900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.687900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.00
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 107757 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.6881 to 100.4589 deg, Dec +62.8211 to +75.4976 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.6881 to 100.4589 deg, Dec 62.8211 to 75.4976 deg
Loaded 14469 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6735 out of 8427 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8427 out of 107757 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 108260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.6873 to 100.6251 deg, Dec +62.8267 to +75.5092 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.6873 to 100.6251 deg, Dec 62.8267 to 75.5092 deg
Loaded 14512 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6694 out of 8433 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8433 out of 108260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 77 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
1.9 pix Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
15.7 mag. Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 12.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3b7MByRzqh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=43, blended=8978, bad_region=18142, passed=107714
Got 107714 stars (including 81712 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 107714 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=1460 n_q2=988 n_q3=1623 n_q4=852 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QV6vuJx19J (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=8926, bad_region=18368, passed=108235
Got 108235 stars (including 82087 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 108235 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 94191 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 94191 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 94191 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=1447 n_q2=1002 n_q3=1616 n_q4=856 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.168
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.dxx30fWMwi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=695, bad_region=4138, passed=24410
Got 24410 stars (including 19677 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24410 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5340)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=7.389 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.180 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.319 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.722 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.963 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.855 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.492 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.666 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.639 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4855 robust_rms_before=0.489 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.496 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.492 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.653 worst_region_rms_after=0.666 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.626 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.639
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.653 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.653 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.489 arcsec matched=4855
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.673 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.473 n_q1=2037 n_q2=915 n_q3=1312 n_q4=591 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.397
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.aNR7yxUUZ4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=879, bad_region=6966, passed=27435
Got 27435 stars (including 19824 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27435 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22137 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22137 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22137 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4840 stars left (next iteration limit 5324)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4840 robust_rms=8.135 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.013 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.013 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4840 robust_rms=0.764 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.121 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.121 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4840 robust_rms=0.507 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.674 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.674 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4840 robust_rms_before=0.509 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.514 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.507 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.691 worst_region_rms_after=0.674 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.698 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.674
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.691 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.691 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.509 arcsec matched=4840
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits N_match=4840 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.672 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.470 n_q1=1276 n_q2=973 n_q3=1429 n_q4=1162 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.330
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-29-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125846_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 125846_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.05 | 05:02:21.13 +72:25:35.6 | 4176 1676 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
**** FOUND 05:02:21.05 +72:25:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125880_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 125880_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 9.29 | 03:55:08.27 +71:42:58.3 | 7319 1924 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125886_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 125886_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 9.32 | 05:46:30.30 +66:13:29.3 | 1201 4964 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125890_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 125890_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 9.59 | 03:57:49.43 +72:23:24.8 | 7119 1546 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125953_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 125953_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 10.27 | 05:02:07.72 +70:45:45.4 | 4105 2680 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125993_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 125993_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 10.73 | 05:19:34.46 +65:44:23.2 | 2777 5588 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126023_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126023_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 10.78 | 05:16:50.79 +70:13:11.5 | 3330 2923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126029_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126029_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 10.84 | 05:04:42.07 +71:32:05.3 | 4020 2204 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126058_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126058_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 10.93 | 05:35:22.89 +65:33:17.8 | 1779 5522 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126067_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126067_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 10.92 | 05:35:07.58 +67:36:23.0 | 2065 4304 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126068_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126068_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 10.98 | 05:38:19.28 +65:30:59.9 | 1592 5505 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126076_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126076_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.13 | 03:59:32.63 +73:21:29.2 | 6939 0981 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126082_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126082_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.01 | 05:35:11.66 +67:31:45.0 | 2051 4349 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126125_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126125_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.22 | 05:34:28.30 +65:09:49.3 | 1784 5768 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126142_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126142_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.19 | 05:35:15.00 +68:58:43.3 | 2238 3489 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126160_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126160_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.35 | 04:07:52.94 +73:41:24.4 | 6552 0840 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126178_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126178_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.34 | 05:02:10.37 +72:40:57.2 | 4197 1522 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126181_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126181_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.35 | 05:30:21.74 +68:25:26.4 | 2433 3873 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126186_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126186_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.33 | 05:06:30.10 +70:27:31.9 | 3870 2843 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126187_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126187_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.49 | 04:12:46.67 +71:43:26.0 | 6488 2053 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126193_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126193_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 10.88 | 04:40:16.82 +66:08:08.3 | 5215 5519 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
**** FOUND 04:40:16.91 +66:08:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126233_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126233_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.73 | 04:16:47.90 +70:09:10.6 | 6397 3020 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126235_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126235_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.64 | 04:20:22.30 +68:54:19.8 | 6282 3789 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126242_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126242_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.61 | 05:05:26.19 +65:43:44.9 | 3652 5700 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126246_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126246_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.60 | 05:39:42.77 +69:18:26.1 | 2047 3241 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126249_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126249_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.50 | 05:29:55.79 +65:39:07.2 | 2128 5532 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126271_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126271_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.61 | 05:40:28.30 +65:46:59.3 | 1498 5316 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126292_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126292_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.53 | 05:49:03.46 +67:21:11.4 | 1236 4260 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126350_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126350_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.67 | 05:39:26.87 +65:48:27.2 | 1564 5316 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126351_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126351_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.71 | 05:07:50.76 +69:20:37.6 | 3732 3506 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126376_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126376_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.76 | 04:20:33.39 +70:11:07.9 | 6203 3019 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126386_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126386_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.83 | 05:32:26.87 +67:12:47.0 | 2168 4570 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126418_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126418_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.85 | 05:42:25.73 +67:34:06.0 | 1646 4231 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126420_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126420_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.74 | 05:23:33.91 +69:08:04.7 | 2879 3517 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126431_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126431_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.82 | 05:41:48.77 +66:37:02.0 | 1540 4802 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126461_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126461_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.00 | 04:28:39.67 +72:56:18.4 | 5696 1386 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126478_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126478_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.11 | 05:28:04.19 +72:42:06.1 | 3042 1351 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126497_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126497_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.95 | 05:35:14.83 +66:47:33.5 | 1951 4786 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126500_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126500_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.46 | 04:40:19.80 +66:10:23.1 | 5212 5496 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
**** FOUND 04:40:19.86 +66:10:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126507_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126507_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.12 | 05:29:28.58 +66:48:50.9 | 2293 4842 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126532_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126532_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.09 | 04:47:05.75 +70:30:50.6 | 4849 2868 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126542_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126542_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.16 | 05:32:24.06 +70:04:05.9 | 2525 2875 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126579_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126579_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.30 | 03:58:39.25 +70:30:00.1 | 7285 2681 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126609_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126609_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.30 | 05:19:07.41 +66:02:01.4 | 2832 5415 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126613_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126613_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.16 | 05:26:57.06 +70:04:44.4 | 2803 2923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126695_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126695_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.51 | 05:44:55.41 +71:59:32.2 | 2189 1597 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126707_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126707_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.35 | 04:51:08.01 +71:51:20.3 | 4675 2052 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126725_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126725_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.45 | 05:33:38.87 +71:56:08.4 | 2698 1755 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126747_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126747_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.37 | 05:41:54.07 +69:00:19.1 | 1888 3391 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126764_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126764_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.68 | 05:07:39.66 +71:56:54.6 | 3905 1941 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126830_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126830_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.72 | 04:56:14.77 +73:12:07.7 | 4481 1226 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126837_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126837_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.50 | 04:54:34.29 +68:56:19.6 | 4425 3805 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126860_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126860_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.61 | 04:38:37.69 +67:31:13.8 | 5303 4678 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126862_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126862_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.59 | 04:52:52.57 +72:27:42.9 | 4609 1682 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126867_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126867_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.41 | 05:42:06.16 +64:58:23.4 | 1277 5774 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126881_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126881_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.61 | 04:06:53.44 +70:48:17.3 | 6846 2566 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126889_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126889_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.39 | 05:16:09.23 +70:42:32.5 | 3406 2635 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126911_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126911_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.08 | 04:04:01.64 +65:39:58.3 | 7478 5626 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
**** FOUND 04:04:01.50 +65:39:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126924_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126924_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.63 | 04:24:28.52 +72:36:38.2 | 5896 1572 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126929_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126929_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.33 | 04:51:31.65 +68:11:43.6 | 4573 4261 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
**** FOUND 04:51:32.07 +68:11:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126937_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126937_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.68 | 04:52:01.58 +70:23:50.6 | 4598 2931 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126963_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126963_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.52 | 05:52:25.92 +65:28:37.4 | 0716 5307 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126978_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126978_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.85 | 04:35:56.56 +72:51:44.0 | 5374 1446 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126992_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 126992_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.66 | 05:49:13.94 +67:39:55.4 | 1278 4074 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127001_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 127001_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 13.20 | 03:52:54.56 +72:59:32.7 | 7268 1143 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127025_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 127025_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.88 | 04:11:25.85 +72:24:01.9 | 6500 1638 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124751_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 124751_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.99 | 05:16:17.63 +67:37:00.4 | 3139 4487 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19345_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 19345_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.25 | 04:22:49.70 +73:23:21.6 | 5933 1095 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94623_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 94623_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.66 | 04:45:16.19 +67:03:55.3 | 4916 4954 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14421_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 14421_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.47 | 03:51:56.88 +73:49:46.7 | 7206 0635 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59921_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 59921_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.28 | 04:37:48.79 +69:31:38.5 | 5327 3464 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
**** FOUND 04:37:48.81 +69:31:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104117_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 104117_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.42 | 05:47:26.89 +66:34:15.9 | 1201 4745 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56756_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 56756_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 12.51 | 05:22:59.46 +69:02:21.8 | 2900 3579 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23293_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 23293_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.66 | 05:15:08.51 +72:24:39.4 | 3594 1621 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
**** FOUND 05:15:08.44 +72:24:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107446_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 107446_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.59 | 05:52:45.95 +66:43:19.9 | 0915 4570 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22749_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 22749_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 11.16 | 03:58:46.09 +73:02:07.7 | 7007 1168 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85042_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 85042_fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 10 11.47933 | 2461324.97933 | 6.55 | 05:42:26.03 +65:41:53.6 | 1365 5338 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_063234_TTUQ2b1x1_3551996_9tzemyNo/fd_Cam-06-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-30-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0412.fits |
**** FOUND 05:42:26.09 +65:41:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Cam-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461324.97869670 -observatory V36
14:37:44.73 -18:22:02.5 Mercury (0.0mag)
14:07:15.46 -20:55:37.7 Venus (-4.5mag)
08:40:07.48 +19:36:12.6 Mars (1.0mag)
09:34:25.11 +15:05:05.9 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:42:25.13 +01:36:45.4 Saturn (0.4mag)
04:12:04.29 +20:57:56.6 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:10:20.18 -00:25:40.2 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:10.78 -23:43:30.2 Pluto (14.5mag)
13:38:45.43 -15:05:11.8 Moon (-8.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Oct 11 06:35 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461324.97869670:
09:34:19.36 +15:05:38.2 Io (6.1mag)
09:34:35.49 +15:04:09.2 Europa (6.2mag)
09:34:40.40 +15:03:42.2 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:34:01.55 +15:07:13.9 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:34:10.05 +15:25:34.8 Himalia (15.6mag)
09:34:23.82 +15:05:13.3 Thebe (16.4mag)
09:33:00.05 +15:26:46.4 Elara (17.5mag)
09:36:51.02 +14:27:56.2 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
09:33:00.92 +15:32:11.8 Carme (18.8mag)
00:42:11.79 +01:36:57.1 Titan (8.2mag)
00:42:27.93 +01:36:41.5 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:41:54.62 +01:33:58.5 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:42:09.57 +01:36:36.0 Hyperion (14.1mag)
00:40:44.55 +01:24:26.1 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 11 06:35 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461324.97869670:
02:48:46.95 +21:20:12.7 JWST
17:28:17.43 +37:15:03.9 Chandra
14:30:01.93 -61:18:31.8 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 11 06:35 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461324.97869670 -observatory V36
03:46:06.68 +20:11:56.6 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:24:47.86 -33:29:40.9 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:39:51.04 -72:24:29.5 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:15:51.27 +34:39:11.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
07:30:13.23 +25:27:26.8 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:01:59.15 +35:40:40.0 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:26:47.05 +41:31:17.8 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:46:12.15 -13:35:28.1 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
12:17:15.78 +15:59:13.9 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:51:04.55 -02:43:40.7 16.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:42:59.45 +65:10:58.7 15.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:36:01.41 +43:16:32.8 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:45:44.80 +14:16:12.1 17.7mag A/2026 E1
16:29:20.74 -21:10:53.7 12.9mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
00:26:47.76 +18:59:03.6 17.6mag 2P/Encke
22:58:22.38 -31:40:35.6 14.5mag 10P/Tempel
02:10:54.13 +38:43:23.1 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:11:17.70 -08:10:12.8 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:22:21.86 -08:52:25.5 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:35:54.36 +16:00:06.5 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
02:59:58.32 +14:20:12.9 17.6mag 88P/Howell
07:39:16.75 +40:16:30.2 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
09:02:51.59 +14:06:54.8 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
11:41:12.35 +13:14:25.8 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
14:06:56.27 -32:14:29.7 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos
06:50:53.94 +19:18:17.7 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
21:38:44.44 +03:30:41.5 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
10:18:42.91 +01:37:50.8 14.3mag 169P/NEAT
03:29:16.81 +04:35:14.3 14.8mag 220P/McNaught
06:03:36.73 +45:14:22.5 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
07:27:45.36 +25:36:57.0 17.9mag 266P/Christensen
09:56:19.87 +31:37:17.5 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.6K Oct 11 06:35 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
05:39:14.97 +51:06:11.70 ASASSN-26fk 2026-10-5.53 -3.9
02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61
22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56
15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 11 06:35 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag
00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 11 06:35 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
22:00:29.980 +18:33:24.69 AT 2026acyi 2026-08-31.60 21.38
01:44:56.733 +00:38:32.49 AT 2026acyh 2026-09-21.88 22.21
01:45:25.068 +03:43:05.31 AT 2026acyg 2026-09-12.91 22.32
23:02:48.800 +03:40:01.33 AT 2026acyf 2026-08-31.80 21.75
05:44:27.090 +33:39:00.48 AT 2026acye 2026-09-25.43 18.62
06:12:59.365 -58:12:49.41 AT 2026acyd 2026-09-25.74 18.37
06:44:13.801 +10:23:30.61 AT 2026acyc 2026-09-24.45 17.58
21:50:55.698 -02:51:50.17 SN 2026acyb 2026-09-20.25 19.4497
17:12:55.487 +34:28:22.84 SN 2026acya 2026-09-22.17 19.6988
18:28:46.287 +43:53:39.30 AT 2026acxz 2026-09-22.18 19.7418
18:50:25.837 +51:48:48.31 AT 2026acxy 2026-09-26.14 19.507
17:29:04.550 +70:58:39.69 AT 2026acxx 2026-09-18.17 19.9857
18:36:38.362 +53:14:52.16 AT 2026acxw 2026-09-22.17 19.6863
03:16:13.837 +33:07:04.16 AT 2026acxv 2026-09-24.50 20.55
05:52:14.054 +15:53:08.19 AT 2026acxu 2026-09-22.43 20.8781
08:02:21.458 +24:05:52.06 AT 2026acxt 2026-09-24.51 19.9945
08:26:53.421 +00:01:31.92 AT 2026acxs 2026-09-24.52 18.9046
08:04:09.422 +26:03:07.21 AT 2026acxr 2026-09-16.52 20.3455
09:49:29.452 +22:28:47.85 AT 2026acxq 2026-09-24.52 18.9887
10:39:38.343 +25:39:08.54 AT 2026acxp 2026-09-24.53 18.7327
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 11 06:35 tns_transients_list.txt