NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Dra-02-Q2b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Dra-02-Q2b1x1 reference image: Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Field Dra-02-Q2b1x1 reference image: Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Field Dra-02-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits
Field Dra-02-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Dra-02-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Dra-02-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Dra-02-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 518746 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 518746 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits_preview.png'
Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits

renamed 'Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits_preview.png'
Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 466.1128 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 556.0200 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1411.9100 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 382.7109 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1403.1037 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 398.3039 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.02912 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.039 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.9699993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-11T06:27:10.0553961' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-11T11:27:10.0553961' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61324.4771997104 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-11T11:27:19.9600227' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61324.4773143521 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 299.998562380921 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.4997801325464 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 22.785 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 353.348333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.56791717065225 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Dra-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '20 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20704 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20704 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.9699993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.9699993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 69.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.39 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 43.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 14.801184 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 10.100808 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/d_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits :) Spent 0.606427 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/d_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.8799991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-11T06:27:55.3885741' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-11T11:27:55.3885741' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61324.477724398 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-11T11:28:05.2886213' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61324.4778389814 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 299.998562599717 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.499780112823 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 22.7663888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 353.388611111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.56987789257269 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Dra-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '20 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20704 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20704 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.8799991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.8799991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 69.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.39 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 43.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 14.801184 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 10.100808 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/d_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits :) Spent 0.550363 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/d_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits


fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461324.97731545 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 20:00:25.265 +77:32:03.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 20:00:05.641 +77:30:19.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 20:00:25.265 +77:32:03.44 Second-epoch image center 20:00:05.641 +77:30:19.04 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0340 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 20:00:02.577 +77:30:49.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 20:00:25.265 +77:32:03.44 Second-epoch image center 20:00:02.577 +77:30:49.98 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0289 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 20:00:05.641 +77:30:19.04 Second-epoch second image center 20:00:02.577 +77:30:49.98 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00903 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C4vShooTvA Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SODlzHOglR Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zug7PGgLUX Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JcdWHLQQq9 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 12698 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 252.9297 to 346.9408 deg, Dec +70.5616 to +82.7992 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 252.9297 to 346.9408 deg, Dec 70.5616 to 82.7992 deg Loaded 14451 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7001 out of 7307 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7307 out of 12698 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.666500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.666500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 12698 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 252.9297 to 346.9408 deg, Dec +70.5616 to +82.7992 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 252.9297 to 346.9408 deg, Dec 70.5616 to 82.7992 deg Loaded 14451 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7001 out of 7307 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7307 out of 12698 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=6.1) Read 12146 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 252.2533 to 346.3014 deg, Dec +70.5615 to +82.8090 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 252.2533 to 346.3014 deg, Dec 70.5615 to 82.8090 deg Loaded 14406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6964 out of 7234 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7234 out of 12146 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits (aperture=6.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits 2.3 pix Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits 2.2 pix fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits 2.2 pix fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits 15.4 mag. Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits 13.7 mag. fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits 14.1 mag. fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.C4vShooTvA (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=770, bad_region=2712, passed=12698 Got 12698 stars (including 9373 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12698 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10536 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10536 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10536 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5383) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.439 n_q1=1621 n_q2=821 n_q3=1531 n_q4=920 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142 The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.SODlzHOglR (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=678, bad_region=2570, passed=12146 Got 12146 stars (including 9034 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12146 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10114 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10114 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10114 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5380) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.463 n_q1=1627 n_q2=819 n_q3=1525 n_q4=920 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.256 The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits -region wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.zug7PGgLUX (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=168, bad_region=585, passed=3531 Got 3531 stars (including 2790 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3531 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.7 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2707 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2695 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2696 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2695 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3064 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.7 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2708 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2697 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3064 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2697 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3064 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 2697 stars left (next iteration limit 2964) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2697 robust_rms=7.951 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.501 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.009 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2697 robust_rms=0.518 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.763 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.763 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2697 robust_rms=0.437 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.692 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.692 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2697 robust_rms_before=0.741 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.424 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.437 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.728 worst_region_rms_after=0.692 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.265 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.692 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.728 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.728 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.424 arcsec matched=2697 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits N_match=2697 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.415 n_q1=1219 n_q2=485 n_q3=680 n_q4=313 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.JcdWHLQQq9 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=182, bad_region=554, passed=3820 Got 3820 stars (including 3092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3820 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 804 to 865 (Dec 70.9 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3014 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3001 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3001 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3001 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3370 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 804 to 865 (Dec 70.9 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3014 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3001 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3370 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3001 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3370 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 3001 stars left (next iteration limit 3301) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3001 robust_rms=7.528 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.524 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=8.886 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3001 robust_rms=0.551 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.877 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.877 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3001 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.670 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.670 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3001 robust_rms_before=0.774 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.428 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.428 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.748 worst_region_rms_after=0.670 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.221 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.670 verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits Image size: 937.5'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 20:00:02.638 +77:30:50.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 3820 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3499396.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.774 -> 0.428 arcsec) SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 3001 pairs from the previous matching) UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 804 to 865 (Dec 70.9 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success SIP_REFIT: re-match found 2927 pairs (3001 from the previous matching) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2927 robust_rms=7.491 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.361 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=8.778 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2927 robust_rms=0.552 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.864 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.864 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2927 robust_rms=0.426 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.667 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.667 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2927 robust_rms_before=0.425 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.425 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.426 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.664 worst_region_rms_after=0.667 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.664 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.667 SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.667 vs 0.664 arcsec) - keeping the current solution SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3370 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3370 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits N_match=2927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.565 n_q1=1336 n_q2=465 n_q3=869 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.275 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits sigma_overall=0.385 worst_q_ratio=1.142 ref2=Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.256 new1=fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits sigma_overall=0.431 worst_q_ratio=1.262 new2=fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits sigma_overall=0.444 worst_q_ratio=1.275 reference average sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.199 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q3: 680 -> 869, 21.749% > 20%; fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits vs fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229_astrometric_residuals.png (4893 matched stars from wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228_astrometric_residuals.png (4891 matched stars from wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409_astrometric_residuals.png (2697 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410_astrometric_residuals.png (2927 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20357_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410 The candidate 20357_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.47784    2461324.97784    10.38    21:14:47.64 +76:37:38.0   2225 3451   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits **** FOUND 21:14:47.53 +76:37:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 05795_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410 The candidate 05795_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 11.47784    2461324.97784    9.87    20:09:57.69 +77:11:10.1   4467 3403   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits **** FOUND 20:09:57.74 +77:11:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits Last image: 2461324.97731545 11.10.2026 11:27:10.055 UTC WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Dra-02-Q2b1x1 as too few input images were matched to the reference image - wrong pointing? clouds? very bad focus? Blind plate solve of the unmatched second-epoch image fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits to check the telescope pointing Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits .... Determining astrometry method... Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 4099 high-SNR stars for plate solving This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3526780.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out3526780.axy"... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4108.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 11-20). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 11-20). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 11-20). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 11-20). log-odds ratio 67.5958 (2.27241e+29), 13 match, 0 conflict, 45 distractors, 47 index. RA,Dec = (300.078,77.5141), pixel scale 5.9397 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+--++-+---+----+------+-+--------------+---+-------+--+(best)-----------------------+-----+------------ Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3526780.solved to indicate this. Field: out3526780.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (300.044427, 77.505595) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (20:00:10.662, +77:30:20.141). Field size: 15.7381 x 10.5425 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 177.062 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits' -> 'fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits' WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Oct 11 06:34 fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Oct 11 06:34 out3526780.wcs Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits)... done! done! All done! done The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits (fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits) Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3526780.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out3526780.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.6733 degrees of RA,Dec (300.041,77.5047) log-odds ratio 36.9181 (1.07972e+16), 8 match, 0 conflict, 25 distractors, 27 index. RA,Dec = (300.076,77.5046), pixel scale 5.94803 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+---------+---+---------+---+(best)-+---------------------------------------+------------------------- Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3526780.solved to indicate this. Field: out3526780.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (300.027844, 77.505750) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (20:00:06.683, +77:30:20.699). Field size: 15.7141 x 10.5422 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 177.072 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Oct 11 06:34 fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Oct 11 06:34 out3526780.wcs Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits)... done! done! All done! The WCS header appears to be added with no errors. Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... simplexy: found 19121 sources. Solving... Reading file "./wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4776, 951.568] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 83.0475 (1.16697e+36), 13 match, 0 conflict, 300 distractors, 13 index. RA,Dec = (300.031,77.5066), pixel scale 5.9622 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+--+-------------------+------+----+----+----------+---------+---------------------------------- --> log-odds 83.0475 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 239.986 (1.67748e+104), 26 match, 0 conflict, 287 distractors, 27 index. RA,Dec = (300.031,77.5066), pixel scale 5.9622 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----++-+---++------++-+----+------+----+----+------+-+-+------+--+---------------------------------- --> log-odds 239.986 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 445.15 (2.11972e+193), 45 match, 0 conflict, 268 distractors, 48 index. RA,Dec = (300.031,77.5066), pixel scale 5.9622 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----++-+---++-++---++-+---++----+-++---+--+++++----+++-++-----+-++---------------------------------+ --> log-odds 445.15 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 878.467 (inf), 93 match, 0 conflict, 1195 distractors, 95 index. RA,Dec = (300.031,77.5066), pixel scale 5.9622 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +---++++---++-++---++++++-+++++++-+++--+--++++++---+++-+++--+-++++-+-+---+-+-+--+-++--------+-+-+--+ --> log-odds 878.467 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1766.14 (inf), 186 match, 0 conflict, 1214 distractors, 190 index. RA,Dec = (300.031,77.5066), pixel scale 5.9622 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+++++++-+++++-+-++++++++++++++-++++++--+++++++-+++++++++-+-+++++++++++++++++++-+++-+-++++++++++++ --> log-odds 1766.14 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3054.02 (inf), 341 match, 0 conflict, 1515 distractors, 354 index. RA,Dec = (300.031,77.5066), pixel scale 5.9622 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++-+++++++++++++++++-+-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 3054.02 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 5883.48 (inf), 714 match, 0 conflict, 4430 distractors, 725 index. RA,Dec = (300.031,77.5066), pixel scale 5.9622 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++-+++++++++++++++++-+-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 5883.48 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 10776.1 (inf), 1408 match, 0 conflict, 6424 distractors, 1425 index. RA,Dec = (300.031,77.5066), pixel scale 5.9622 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++-+-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 10776.1 Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.4776, 951.568] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 83.0475 (1.16697e+36), 13 match, 0 conflict, 300 distractors, 13 index. RA,Dec = (300.031,77.5066), pixel scale 5.9622 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+--+-------------------+------+----+----+----------+---------+---------------------------------- --> log-odds 83.0475 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 239.986 (1.67748e+104), 26 match, 0 conflict, 287 distractors, 27 index. RA,Dec = (300.031,77.5066), pixel scale 5.9622 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----++-+---++------++-+----+------+----+----+------+-+-+------+--+---------------------------------- --> log-odds 239.986 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 445.15 (2.11972e+193), 45 match, 0 conflict, 268 distractors, 48 index. RA,Dec = (300.031,77.5066), pixel scale 5.9622 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----++-+---++-++---++-+---++----+-++---+--+++++----+++-++-----+-++---------------------------------+ --> log-odds 445.15 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 878.467 (inf), 93 match, 0 conflict, 1195 distractors, 95 index. RA,Dec = (300.031,77.5066), pixel scale 5.9622 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +---++++---++-++---++++++-+++++++-+++--+--++++++---+++-+++--+-++++-+-+---+-+-+--+-++--------+-+-+--+ --> log-odds 878.467 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1766.14 (inf), 186 match, 0 conflict, 1214 distractors, 190 index. RA,Dec = (300.031,77.5066), pixel scale 5.9622 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+++++++-+++++-+-++++++++++++++-++++++--+++++++-+++++++++-+-+++++++++++++++++++-+++-+-++++++++++++ --> log-odds 1766.14 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3054.02 (inf), 341 match, 0 conflict, 1515 distractors, 354 index. RA,Dec = (300.031,77.5066), pixel scale 5.9622 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++-+++++++++++++++++-+-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 3054.02 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 5883.48 (inf), 714 match, 0 conflict, 4430 distractors, 725 index. RA,Dec = (300.031,77.5066), pixel scale 5.9622 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++-+++++++++++++++++-+-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 5883.48 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 10776.1 (inf), 1408 match, 0 conflict, 6424 distractors, 1425 index. RA,Dec = (300.031,77.5066), pixel scale 5.9622 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++-+-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --> log-odds 10776.1 Got 16 solutions. Field: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (300.027132, 77.506160) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (20:00:06.512, +77:30:22.176). Field size: 15.71 x 10.5397 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 177.092 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.new"... renamed 'wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits Generating wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 20:00:05.641 +77:30:19.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 25798 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3597106.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the blindly solved unmatched second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 20:00:25.265 +77:32:03.44 Second-epoch image center 20:00:05.641 +77:30:19.04 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0340 deg. ################################### The second-epoch image center is consistent with the reference image center (offset 0.0340 deg.) - the star matching failure is probably not a pointing problem ____ VaST output ____ --==VaST 1.0rc90==-- Parsing command line arguments... opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius! opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching! opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source! opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted! opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope) opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag! WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars. opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done! opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually! opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored! INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ... Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found. This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file. Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd)... OK Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files. Done with cleaning! VaST was started with the following command line: ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits Preparing to process 4 input FITS images... ######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ######## transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search! transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search! transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!! transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3 transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars transient search mode: not discarding large sources ################ Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix We have 4 images to process. SExtractor catalog cache: restored Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits catalog from cache SExtractor catalog cache: restored Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits catalog from cache Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads... Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user Parent process says: we are done fork()ing. Waiting for thread 2 to finish... autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.6,4.6,4.1,5.0,5.5,6.0 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.6,4.6,4.1,5.0,5.5,6.0 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits Waiting for thread 1 to finish... autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits Done with SExtractor! TIMING SExtractor: 9 seconds Matching stars between images! No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine. Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-11T08:02:49.3756474 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-11T08:02:49.3756474 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-06-11T08:02:49.375 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits Exposure 20 sec, 11.06.2026 08:02:49.375 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461202.83540943 mid. exp. The reference image star 8080.062 48.349 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7902.672 46.703 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8129.177 52.289 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8154.866 40.976 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7914.436 31.365 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9448.565 29.582 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9457.947 19.421 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8842.218 19.558 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8522.632 17.197 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8392.122 16.791 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more reference image stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 62799, (62799 good for image matching) * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 10 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 10626 * rejected close to frame edge: 243 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.8 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 78 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied. get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -6.90 Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -6.9 (4.0 sigma detection) The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.5 80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -7.6 Selected detection limit= -7.6 Final detection limit= -7.6 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0) Parameter box for transient search: 10.04.9 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 132 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 58421 * detected, using 465/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.009443, number_of_ambiguous_matches=593 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=55234 inliers=55234 rms 0.34 -> 0.34 pix, max corner correction 0.5 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.009459, number_of_ambiguous_matches=594 55233 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=55233 inliers=55233 rms 0.33 -> 0.33 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.008806, number_of_ambiguous_matches=553 55229 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=55229 inliers=55229 rms 0.33 -> 0.33 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.003551, number_of_ambiguous_matches=223 55180 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = -0.305 58421 stars detected, 55180 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 51627, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 51627 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 51620 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00000*X_pix +0.00000*Y_pix -0.02907 Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)... Computing robust linear magnitude calibration. Used 45262 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -6.95 66040 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) Magnitude calibration is performed successfully! Saving observations to the cache... OK memory: 241164 kB used, 280716 kB peak, 65261712 kB available RAM processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-11T11:27:10.0553961 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-11T11:27:10.0553961 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-10-11T11:27:10.055 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits The star 8503.426 14.001 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9562.552 17.367 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9421.085 17.160 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8938.715 10.224 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8711.939 4.381 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8238.979 5.985 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7708.993 30.031 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9118.099 22.536 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9406.684 18.162 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9142.524 17.769 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 22360 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 1 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 3048 * rejected close to frame edge: 136 * rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.6 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 253 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 22360 * detected, using 178/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000757, number_of_ambiguous_matches=50 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=14038 inliers=14038 rms 1.07 -> 0.38 pix, max corner correction 6.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000697, number_of_ambiguous_matches=46 14038 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=14038 inliers=14038 rms 0.36 -> 0.36 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000697, number_of_ambiguous_matches=46 14038 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=14038 inliers=14038 rms 0.36 -> 0.36 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000394, number_of_ambiguous_matches=26 14014 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = -174.944 22360 stars detected, 14014 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 12510, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 12510 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 10867 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00015*X_pix +0.00018*Y_pix -1.13598 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 10867 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.26  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  66040 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) memory: 243700 kB used, 280716 kB peak, 65261712 kB available RAM processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-11T11:27:55.3885741 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-11T11:27:55.3885741 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-10-11T11:27:55.388 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits The star 8502.165 19.632 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9561.354 23.088 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8937.347 15.885 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8237.707 11.661 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8710.722 9.917 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8082.586 6.570 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9476.707 3.542 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9241.337 3.091 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8129.237 1.405 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8847.379 11.416 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 24608 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 4 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 2941 * rejected close to frame edge: 138 * rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.6 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 161 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 24608 * detected, using 195/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000954, number_of_ambiguous_matches=63 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=15520 inliers=15520 rms 1.44 -> 0.37 pix, max corner correction 3.9 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000878, number_of_ambiguous_matches=58 15526 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=15526 inliers=15526 rms 0.35 -> 0.35 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000878, number_of_ambiguous_matches=58 15526 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=15526 inliers=15526 rms 0.35 -> 0.35 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000485, number_of_ambiguous_matches=32 15509 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = -174.955 24608 stars detected, 15509 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 13946, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 13946 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 10103 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00024*X_pix +0.00013*Y_pix -1.17682 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 10103 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.24  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  66040 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) memory: 244468 kB used, 280716 kB peak, 65261712 kB available RAM processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%) TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds Done with measurements! =) Total number of measurements 121220 (121220 measurements stored in RAM) Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory... Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files... TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory... Creating vast_image_details.log ... Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK Selecting the best aperture for each source Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 10161 stars Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 15915 stars Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 9347 stars Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 6599 stars Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 13158 stars done! =) TIMING select_aperture: 3 seconds Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make' Computing, please wait a bit ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 54961 objects, the longest string is 384 bytes. Allocating memory for resorting the file. ----***** VaST processing WARNING *****---- You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one. Please investigate this! ************************************************************** This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic messages printed above (or the vast*.log files): * How many of the input images are matched? * Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable? * Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent? You may run ./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings (star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration file, see various examples in the VaST directory). If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/ ************************************************************** Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1) _____________________ ERROR running VaST on the field Dra-02-Q2b1x1 (less than 4 images processed) exp_start= 11.06.2026 08:02:49.375 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461202.83540943 ap= 4.8 rotation= 0.000 *detected= 62799 *matched= 62799 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-02-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits exp_start= 12.06.2026 09:12:40.864 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461203.88392204 ap= 4.9 rotation= -0.305 *detected= 58421 *matched= 55180 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_04-12-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0228.fits exp_start= 11.10.2026 11:27:10.055 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461324.97731545 ap= 4.6 rotation= -174.944 *detected= 22360 *matched= 14014 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0409.fits exp_start= 11.10.2026 11:27:55.388 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461324.97784014 ap= 4.6 rotation= -174.955 *detected= 24608 *matched= 15509 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_063034_TTUQ2b1x1_3352501_1qmxEhqd/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_06-27-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0410.fits ########### Completed Dra-02-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461324.97731545 -observatory V36 14:37:44.40 -18:22:00.6 Mercury (0.0mag) 14:07:15.55 -20:55:38.1 Venus (-4.5mag) 08:40:07.29 +19:36:13.2 Mars (1.0mag) 09:34:25.05 +15:05:06.2 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:42:25.16 +01:36:45.6 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:12:04.30 +20:57:56.6 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:10:20.19 -00:25:40.2 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:10.78 -23:43:30.2 Pluto (14.5mag) 13:38:40.67 -15:04:40.6 Moon (-8.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Oct 11 06:33 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461324.97731545: 09:34:19.31 +15:05:38.4 Io (6.1mag) 09:34:35.43 +15:04:09.4 Europa (6.2mag) 09:34:40.34 +15:03:42.5 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:34:01.49 +15:07:14.2 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:34:09.99 +15:25:35.1 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:34:23.73 +15:05:13.7 Thebe (16.4mag) 09:33:00.00 +15:26:46.6 Elara (17.5mag) 09:36:50.97 +14:27:56.4 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:33:00.88 +15:32:12.0 Carme (18.8mag) 00:42:11.82 +01:36:57.2 Titan (8.2mag) 00:42:27.96 +01:36:41.6 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:41:54.64 +01:33:58.7 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:42:09.59 +01:36:36.1 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:40:44.57 +01:24:26.2 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 11 06:33 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461324.97731545: 02:48:46.76 +21:20:14.6 JWST 17:28:03.84 +37:16:40.2 Chandra 14:28:49.69 -61:20:31.5 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 11 06:33 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461324.97731545 -observatory V36 03:46:06.71 +20:11:56.6 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:24:47.79 -33:29:41.0 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:39:51.01 -72:24:29.1 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:15:51.28 +34:39:11.6 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 07:30:13.19 +25:27:26.9 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:01:59.12 +35:40:39.5 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:26:47.03 +41:31:18.0 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:46:12.14 -13:35:28.1 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:17:15.62 +15:59:14.3 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:51:04.47 -02:43:40.3 16.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:42:59.11 +65:11:00.7 15.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:36:01.50 +43:16:33.6 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:45:44.72 +14:16:11.6 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:29:20.71 -21:10:32.5 12.9mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 00:26:47.96 +18:59:04.3 17.6mag 2P/Encke 22:58:22.28 -31:40:36.7 14.5mag 10P/Tempel 02:10:54.02 +38:43:23.9 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:11:17.64 -08:10:12.4 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:22:21.92 -08:52:25.4 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 07:35:54.25 +16:00:07.0 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 02:59:58.41 +14:20:13.2 17.6mag 88P/Howell 07:39:16.46 +40:16:28.7 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:02:51.40 +14:06:56.6 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:41:12.18 +13:14:26.9 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 14:06:56.06 -32:14:28.2 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos 06:50:53.89 +19:18:17.9 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 21:38:45.14 +03:30:37.4 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:18:42.70 +01:37:52.0 14.3mag 169P/NEAT 03:29:16.86 +04:35:15.0 14.8mag 220P/McNaught 06:03:36.61 +45:14:21.4 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 07:27:45.24 +25:36:57.2 17.9mag 266P/Christensen 09:56:19.78 +31:37:17.8 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.6K Oct 11 06:33 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 05:39:14.97 +51:06:11.70 ASASSN-26fk 2026-10-5.53 -3.9 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 11 06:33 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 11 06:33 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 22:00:29.980 +18:33:24.69 AT 2026acyi 2026-08-31.60 21.38 01:44:56.733 +00:38:32.49 AT 2026acyh 2026-09-21.88 22.21 01:45:25.068 +03:43:05.31 AT 2026acyg 2026-09-12.91 22.32 23:02:48.800 +03:40:01.33 AT 2026acyf 2026-08-31.80 21.75 05:44:27.090 +33:39:00.48 AT 2026acye 2026-09-25.43 18.62 06:12:59.365 -58:12:49.41 AT 2026acyd 2026-09-25.74 18.37 06:44:13.801 +10:23:30.61 AT 2026acyc 2026-09-24.45 17.58 21:50:55.698 -02:51:50.17 SN 2026acyb 2026-09-20.25 19.4497 17:12:55.487 +34:28:22.84 SN 2026acya 2026-09-22.17 19.6988 18:28:46.287 +43:53:39.30 AT 2026acxz 2026-09-22.18 19.7418 18:50:25.837 +51:48:48.31 AT 2026acxy 2026-09-26.14 19.507 17:29:04.550 +70:58:39.69 AT 2026acxx 2026-09-18.17 19.9857 18:36:38.362 +53:14:52.16 AT 2026acxw 2026-09-22.17 19.6863 03:16:13.837 +33:07:04.16 AT 2026acxv 2026-09-24.50 20.55 05:52:14.054 +15:53:08.19 AT 2026acxu 2026-09-22.43 20.8781 08:02:21.458 +24:05:52.06 AT 2026acxt 2026-09-24.51 19.9945 08:26:53.421 +00:01:31.92 AT 2026acxs 2026-09-24.52 18.9046 08:04:09.422 +26:03:07.21 AT 2026acxr 2026-09-16.52 20.3455 09:49:29.452 +22:28:47.85 AT 2026acxq 2026-09-24.52 18.9887 10:39:38.343 +25:39:08.54 AT 2026acxp 2026-09-24.53 18.7327 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 11 06:33 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 92 C