NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Col-01-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Col-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Field Col-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Field Col-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
Field Col-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Col-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Col-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Col-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 570769 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 570769 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.png' -> 'transient_report/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits_preview.png'
Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits

renamed 'Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.png' -> 'transient_report/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits_preview.png'
Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2284.0459 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 653.0067 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 6804.4491 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1964.5601 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 6474.4114 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 2016.1026 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.97912 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.026 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 18.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-11T04:17:39.2771217' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-11T09:17:39.2771217' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61324.3872601506 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-11T09:17:49.1814848' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61324.3873747801 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 78.2585252954775 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -33.9994901323157 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 19.4838888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 161.635555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.97461611783265 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Col-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '05 13 03' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-34 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29498 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29498 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 61.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.98 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 28.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 14.401152 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/d_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits :) Spent 0.499086 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/d_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 18.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-11T04:18:20.6794088' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-11T09:18:20.6794088' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61324.3877393403 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-11T09:18:30.5799007' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61324.3878539237 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 78.2585252441592 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -33.9994901087952 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 19.5275 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 161.775277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.96834702531028 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Col-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '05 13 03' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-34 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29498 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29498 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 61.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.98 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 28.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 14.401152 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/d_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits :) Spent 0.497570 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/d_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits


fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461324.88737589 Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' 'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt' wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits Image size: 941.4'x628.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:13:03.655 -33:59:56.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits Image size: 941.1'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:13:02.722 -33:59:51.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:13:03.655 -33:59:56.30 Second-epoch image center 05:13:02.722 -33:59:51.95 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0034 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Image size: 941.1'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:13:03.530 -33:59:46.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:13:03.655 -33:59:56.30 Second-epoch image center 05:13:03.530 -33:59:46.15 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0029 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 05:13:02.722 -33:59:51.95 Second-epoch second image center 05:13:03.530 -33:59:46.15 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00322 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3P4F025Tdc Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mPAapQdgoj Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aIeBpktZ53 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits &> /tmp/tmp.k6c8Cs9jnB Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits and wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits and wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits and wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits) and catalog (wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 5729 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 68.5394 to 88.4743 deg, Dec -39.3546 to -28.1510 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 68.5394 to 88.4743 deg, Dec -39.3546 to -28.1510 deg Loaded 9076 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3282 out of 3399 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3399 out of 5729 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.715100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.715100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.01 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.71 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.71
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 5729 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 68.5394 to 88.4743 deg, Dec -39.3546 to -28.1510 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 68.5394 to 88.4743 deg, Dec -39.3546 to -28.1510 deg Loaded 9076 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3282 out of 3399 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3399 out of 5729 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits (aperture=5.8) Read 5707 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 68.5385 to 88.4741 deg, Dec -39.3481 to -28.1505 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 68.5385 to 88.4741 deg, Dec -39.3481 to -28.1505 deg Loaded 9077 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4808 out of 4967 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4967 out of 5707 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits (aperture=5.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits 2.0 pix Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits 3.6 pix fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits 3.5 pix fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.7 mag. Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits 14.7 mag. Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits 12.7 mag. fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits 12.7 mag. fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.7 (SNR ) 10.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.3P4F025Tdc (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits' -> 'wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=466, bad_region=0, passed=5729 Got 5729 stars (including 5255 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5729 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4916 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5729 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5729 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5729 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4914 stars left (next iteration limit 5406) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits N_match=4914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.367 n_q1=1366 n_q2=1183 n_q3=1316 n_q4=1049 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.064 The image catalog is written to wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits -region wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.mPAapQdgoj (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits' -> 'wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=462, bad_region=0, passed=5707 Got 5707 stars (including 5232 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5707 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.3 to -28.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5707 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.3 to -28.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5707 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5707 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5403) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=1346 n_q2=1188 n_q3=1317 n_q4=1060 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.158 The image catalog is written to wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits -region wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.aIeBpktZ53 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=72, bad_region=0, passed=1221 Got 1221 stars (including 1149 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1221 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1121 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1118 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1069 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1118 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1166 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1121 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1118 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1166 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1118 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1166 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 1118 stars left (next iteration limit 1229) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1118 robust_rms=11.794 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.844 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.844 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1118 robust_rms=0.433 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.598 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.598 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1118 robust_rms=0.320 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.432 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.418 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1118 robust_rms_before=0.685 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.385 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.320 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.716 worst_region_rms_after=0.432 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.004 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.418 verification OK: wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:13:02.735 -33:59:52.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 1221 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3908624.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.685 -> 0.320 arcsec) SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 1118 pairs from the previous matching) UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1045 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success SIP_REFIT: re-match found 1045 pairs (1118 from the previous matching) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1045 robust_rms=11.712 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.351 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.351 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1045 robust_rms=0.423 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.576 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.576 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1045 robust_rms=0.318 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.433 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.416 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1045 robust_rms_before=0.320 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.320 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.318 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.432 worst_region_rms_after=0.433 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.409 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.416 SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.433 vs 0.432 arcsec) - keeping the current solution SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1045 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1159 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1045 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1155 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits N_match=1045 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.310 n_q1=194 n_q2=136 n_q3=429 n_q4=286 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.556 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits -region wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.k6c8Cs9jnB (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=74, bad_region=0, passed=1479 Got 1479 stars (including 1405 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1479 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.3 to -28.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1369 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1365 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1332 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1365 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1440 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.3 to -28.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1368 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1364 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1440 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1364 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1439 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 1364 stars left (next iteration limit 1501) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1364 robust_rms=12.640 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.381 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.381 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1364 robust_rms=0.454 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.603 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.603 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1364 robust_rms=0.327 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.435 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.433 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1364 robust_rms_before=0.676 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.328 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.327 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.571 worst_region_rms_after=0.435 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.990 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.433 verification OK: wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Image size: 941.3'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:13:03.542 -33:59:46.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 1479 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3908674.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.676 -> 0.327 arcsec) SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 1364 pairs from the previous matching) UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.3 to -28.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1290 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success SIP_REFIT: re-match found 1290 pairs (1364 from the previous matching) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1290 robust_rms=12.599 arcsec worst_region_rms=22.454 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=22.454 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1290 robust_rms=0.450 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.596 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.596 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1290 robust_rms=0.321 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.431 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.431 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1290 robust_rms_before=0.322 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.322 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.321 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.431 worst_region_rms_after=0.431 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.429 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.431 verification OK: wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Image size: 941.3'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:13:03.541 -33:59:46.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 1479 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3908817.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.322 -> 0.321 arcsec) Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1290 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1435 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1290 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1432 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits N_match=1290 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=175 n_q2=129 n_q3=535 n_q4=451 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.397 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits -region wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits sigma_overall=0.385 worst_q_ratio=1.064 ref2=Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits sigma_overall=0.341 worst_q_ratio=1.158 new1=fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits sigma_overall=0.326 worst_q_ratio=1.556 new2=fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits sigma_overall=0.337 worst_q_ratio=1.397 reference average sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.111 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q4: 286 -> 451, 36.585% > 20%; fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits vs fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065_astrometric_residuals.png (4914 matched stars from wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066_astrometric_residuals.png (4911 matched stars from wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281_astrometric_residuals.png (1045 matched stars from wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282_astrometric_residuals.png (1290 matched stars from wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Col-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Col-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits Image size: 941.4'x628.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:13:03.655 -33:59:56.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits Image size: 941.4'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:13:02.735 -33:59:52.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:13:03.655 -33:59:56.30 Second-epoch image center 05:13:02.735 -33:59:52.26 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0034 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Image size: 941.3'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:13:03.541 -33:59:46.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:13:03.655 -33:59:56.30 Second-epoch image center 05:13:03.541 -33:59:46.48 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0028 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 05:13:02.735 -33:59:52.26 Second-epoch second image center 05:13:03.541 -33:59:46.48 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00321 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hXG2BUKsOe Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M5e8R89Z2h Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KaRnrt5ojH Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LBNXMwetc6 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits and wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits and wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits and wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits) and catalog (wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 40652 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 68.4650 to 88.5507 deg, Dec -39.3746 to -28.0859 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 68.4650 to 88.5507 deg, Dec -39.3746 to -28.0859 deg Loaded 9230 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4576 out of 4899 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4899 out of 40652 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.587600 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.587600 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.87 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.87
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 40652 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 68.4650 to 88.5507 deg, Dec -39.3746 to -28.0859 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 68.4650 to 88.5507 deg, Dec -39.3746 to -28.0859 deg Loaded 9230 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4576 out of 4899 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4899 out of 40652 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits (aperture=4.5) Read 41109 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 68.5051 to 88.6090 deg, Dec -39.3713 to -28.0842 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 68.5051 to 88.6090 deg, Dec -39.3713 to -28.0842 deg Loaded 9252 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6652 out of 7079 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7079 out of 41109 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits (aperture=4.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 28 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits 1.9 pix Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits 3.2 pix fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits 3.2 pix fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.9 mag. Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits 14.9 mag. Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits 13.2 mag. fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits 13.3 mag. fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 12.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.hXG2BUKsOe (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits' -> 'wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1452, bad_region=1, passed=40645 Got 40645 stars (including 39110 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40645 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40645 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40645 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40645 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4924 stars left (next iteration limit 5415) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits N_match=4924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.361 n_q1=1425 n_q2=1175 n_q3=1319 n_q4=1005 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.033 The image catalog is written to wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits -region wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.M5e8R89Z2h (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits' -> 'wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1465, bad_region=0, passed=41099 Got 41099 stars (including 39551 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41099 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4926 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41099 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41099 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41099 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4926 stars left (next iteration limit 5418) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits N_match=4926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=1433 n_q2=1169 n_q3=1312 n_q4=1012 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.143 The image catalog is written to wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits -region wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.KaRnrt5ojH (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=208, bad_region=3, passed=8625 Got 8625 stars (including 8412 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8625 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8616 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8616 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8616 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64" Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=9.943 arcsec worst_region_rms=33.026 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=33.026 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.759 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.062 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.062 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.683 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.909 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.891 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4897 robust_rms_before=0.682 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.700 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.683 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.931 worst_region_rms_after=0.909 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.928 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.891 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.931 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.931 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.682 arcsec matched=4897 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.803 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.855 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.567 n_q1=983 n_q2=772 n_q3=1781 n_q4=1361 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.391 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits -region wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.LBNXMwetc6 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=238, bad_region=1, passed=10017 Got 10017 stars (including 9776 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10017 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10011 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10011 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10011 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54" Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=11.271 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.410 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.410 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=0.692 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.945 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.945 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=0.590 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.817 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.772 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4899 robust_rms_before=0.592 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.595 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.590 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.824 worst_region_rms_after=0.817 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.797 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.772 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.824 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.824 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.592 arcsec matched=4899 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.821 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.747 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.488 n_q1=789 n_q2=614 n_q3=1904 n_q4=1592 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.503 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits -region wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/wcs_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Col-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-03-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits at 05:11:39.00 -32:58:22.5: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_21-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0066.fits at 05:11:39.00 -32:58:22.5: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:39.00 -32:58:22.5: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5971 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53293_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53293_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    10.55    04:36:22.42 -33:08:48.9   0124 3246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53295_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53295_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    10.62    04:42:14.68 -30:13:44.7   0641 5106   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53302_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53302_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    10.59    05:07:27.54 -32:36:13.8   4035 3987   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53323_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53323_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    11.23    05:05:12.11 -32:03:13.7   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53333_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53333_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    11.09    05:08:07.58 -36:11:35.7   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53345_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53345_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    11.16    05:14:14.19 -38:21:23.6   5070 0580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53349_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53349_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    11.10    05:31:39.56 -37:55:39.3   7134 0898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53353_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53353_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    11.36    05:37:34.34 -30:54:24.4   7869 5142   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53359_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53359_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    11.21    05:40:22.38 -36:57:47.2   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53366_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53366_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    11.61    05:13:41.63 -36:49:08.0   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53375_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53375_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    11.22    05:43:33.35 -36:32:07.5   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53376_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53376_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    11.65    05:24:40.38 -31:45:27.0   6203 4602   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53379_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53379_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    11.98    05:10:14.90 -29:29:24.5   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53380_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53380_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    11.76    05:18:13.60 -30:20:52.4   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53421_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53421_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    12.20    05:20:07.95 -36:32:18.5   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53426_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53426_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    12.21    04:35:34.50 -38:18:26.1   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53444_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53444_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    12.48    05:07:48.22 -31:01:54.2   4015 4935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53445_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53445_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    11.92    05:45:27.44 -37:35:07.6   8801 1083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53460_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53460_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    12.88    04:39:21.34 -31:11:22.8   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53462_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53462_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    12.49    05:06:10.71 -30:55:41.3   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53465_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53465_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    12.37    05:17:54.79 -38:56:20.7   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53469_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53469_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    12.70    04:38:58.41 -30:42:26.1   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53470_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53470_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    12.56    05:26:31.88 -35:51:35.7   6494 2139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53474_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53474_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    13.10    04:53:53.37 -31:56:54.9   2275 4236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53475_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 53475_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    12.15    05:48:06.10 -37:51:41.8   9118 0903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 18306_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 18306_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 10 11.38738    2461324.88738    11.55    05:11:39.00 -32:58:22.0   4580 3800   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-17-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits Discovery image 3   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    11.64    05:11:39.00 -32:58:23.1   4578 3799   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 18239_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 18239_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    12.09    05:43:42.96 -32:23:29.2   8655 4236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits **** FOUND 05:43:42.93 -32:23:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21426_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 The candidate 21426_fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 10 11.38786    2461324.88786    9.01    05:19:17.34 -33:42:30.1   5559 3405   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Col-01-Q1b1x1_041907_TTUQ1b1x1_3897358_h3foHzGb/fd_Col-01-Q1b1x1_2026-10-11_04-18-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits **** FOUND 05:19:17.33 -33:42:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Col-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Col-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461324.88737589 -observatory V36 14:37:22.57 -18:19:53.4 Mercury (0.0mag) 14:07:21.66 -20:56:10.0 Venus (-4.5mag) 08:39:54.86 +19:36:53.1 Mars (1.0mag) 09:34:21.59 +15:05:22.0 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:42:26.73 +01:36:55.3 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:12:04.88 +20:57:58.0 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:10:20.73 -00:25:36.8 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:10.84 -23:43:30.3 Pluto (14.5mag) 13:33:08.50 -14:31:57.3 Moon (-8.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Oct 11 04:20 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461324.88737589: 09:34:16.25 +15:05:52.0 Io (6.1mag) 09:34:31.31 +15:04:28.7 Europa (6.2mag) 09:34:36.24 +15:04:01.9 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:33:57.53 +15:07:32.8 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:34:06.14 +15:25:52.3 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:34:18.85 +15:05:36.8 Thebe (16.4mag) 09:32:56.30 +15:27:01.2 Elara (17.5mag) 09:36:47.85 +14:28:11.9 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:32:57.81 +15:32:26.5 Carme (18.8mag) 00:42:13.57 +01:37:07.6 Titan (8.2mag) 00:42:30.00 +01:36:49.9 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:41:56.03 +01:34:08.4 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:42:11.03 +01:36:46.7 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:40:46.18 +01:24:36.1 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 11 04:20 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461324.88737589: 02:48:39.94 +21:21:39.2 JWST 17:13:04.16 +39:09:38.9 Chandra 13:09:12.07 -62:16:45.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 11 04:20 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461324.88737589 -observatory V36 03:46:08.40 +20:11:55.7 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:24:42.91 -33:29:49.0 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:39:48.87 -72:24:07.6 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:15:51.91 +34:39:02.1 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 07:30:11.13 +25:27:29.9 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:01:56.59 +35:40:04.8 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:26:45.81 +41:31:32.6 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:46:11.91 -13:35:24.0 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:17:05.52 +15:59:40.7 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:50:58.99 -02:43:13.2 16.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:42:36.61 +65:13:10.6 15.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:36:07.69 +43:17:20.5 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:45:39.50 +14:15:38.9 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:29:18.67 -20:47:24.7 12.9mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 00:27:01.36 +18:59:52.2 17.6mag 2P/Encke 22:58:16.35 -31:41:50.7 14.5mag 10P/Tempel 02:10:47.12 +38:44:21.0 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:11:14.01 -08:09:45.9 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:22:25.41 -08:52:15.9 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 07:35:47.18 +16:00:41.2 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 03:00:03.95 +14:20:29.0 17.6mag 88P/Howell 07:38:57.00 +40:14:54.5 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:02:38.85 +14:08:51.7 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:41:01.07 +13:15:40.8 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 14:06:42.41 -32:12:55.7 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos 06:50:50.17 +19:18:31.7 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 21:39:30.98 +03:26:11.7 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:18:29.30 +01:39:08.7 14.3mag 169P/NEAT 03:29:20.01 +04:35:56.0 14.8mag 220P/McNaught 06:03:28.77 +45:13:09.3 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 07:27:37.48 +25:37:04.9 17.9mag 266P/Christensen 09:56:14.37 +31:37:37.1 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.6K Oct 11 04:20 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 05:39:14.97 +51:06:11.70 ASASSN-26fk 2026-10-5.53 -3.9 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 11 04:20 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 11 04:20 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 18:28:46.287 +43:53:39.30 AT 2026acxz 2026-09-22.18 19.7418 18:50:25.837 +51:48:48.31 AT 2026acxy 2026-09-26.14 19.507 17:29:04.550 +70:58:39.69 AT 2026acxx 2026-09-18.17 19.9857 18:36:38.362 +53:14:52.16 AT 2026acxw 2026-09-22.17 19.6863 03:16:13.837 +33:07:04.16 AT 2026acxv 2026-09-24.50 20.55 05:52:14.054 +15:53:08.19 AT 2026acxu 2026-09-22.43 20.8781 08:02:21.458 +24:05:52.06 AT 2026acxt 2026-09-24.51 19.9945 08:26:53.421 +00:01:31.92 AT 2026acxs 2026-09-24.52 18.9046 08:04:09.422 +26:03:07.21 AT 2026acxr 2026-09-16.52 20.3455 09:49:29.452 +22:28:47.85 AT 2026acxq 2026-09-24.52 18.9887 10:39:38.343 +25:39:08.54 AT 2026acxp 2026-09-24.53 18.7327 10:46:46.678 +35:46:40.03 AT 2026acxo 2026-09-24.53 18.7833 07:54:42.514 -01:42:07.85 AT 2026acxn 2026-09-24.52 20.2449 08:05:13.593 +06:17:43.23 AT 2026acxm 2026-09-24.52 19.4626 08:21:28.246 +03:46:33.77 AT 2026acxl 2026-09-24.52 19.7999 04:46:32.556 +00:05:47.64 AT 2026acxk 2026-09-22.48 20.2187 03:43:52.593 +21:51:56.00 AT 2026acxj 2026-07-06.48 19.0551 07:17:54.475 +23:18:27.43 AT 2026acxi 2026-09-25.47 19.7261 05:06:29.004 +73:49:45.19 AT 2026acxh 2026-09-16.43 20.0492 02:06:05.697 -18:58:51.46 AT 2026acxg 2026-09-24.55 20.61 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 11 04:20 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 57 C