NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Psc-07-Q2b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Psc-07-Q2b1x1 reference image: Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
Field Psc-07-Q2b1x1 reference image: Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits
Field Psc-07-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Field Psc-07-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Psc-07-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Psc-07-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Psc-07-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 549025 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 549025 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.png' -> 'transient_report/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits_preview.png'
Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits

renamed 'Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.png' -> 'transient_report/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits_preview.png'
Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 560.8605 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 486.8639 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1874.8120 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 358.4328 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1809.0062 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 338.8207 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.34274 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.058 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 19.1599998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 19.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-11T03:45:35.2397304' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-11T08:45:35.2397304' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61324.3649911922 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-11T08:45:45.1444797' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61324.3651058334 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 347.141663384063 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 6.00010341512732 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 26.5927777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 259.0225 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.22532432218376 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Psc-07' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '23 08 34' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+06 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20726 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20726 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.1599998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.1599998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 59.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.82 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 19.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 13.701096 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/d_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits :) Spent 0.610937 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/d_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 19.0699996948242 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 19.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-10-11T03:46:22.6025353' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-10-11T08:46:22.6025353' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61324.3655393752 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-10-11T08:46:32.5021954' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61324.3656539582 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 347.14166340245 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 6.00010341212793 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 26.4358333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 259.144444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.23745381517485 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Psc-07' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '23 08 34' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+06 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20726 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20726 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.0699996948242 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.0699996948242 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 59.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.82 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 19.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 13.701096 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/d_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits :) Spent 0.645407 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/d_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits


fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461324.86510693 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:08:35.062 +05:59:47.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:08:46.511 +06:01:42.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:08:35.062 +05:59:47.09 Second-epoch image center 23:08:46.511 +06:01:42.67 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0573 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:08:43.645 +06:01:47.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:08:35.062 +05:59:47.09 Second-epoch image center 23:08:43.645 +06:01:47.66 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0489 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 23:08:46.511 +06:01:42.67 Second-epoch second image center 23:08:43.645 +06:01:47.66 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01196 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9gFa0tsQT7 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MFjylVlXgr Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IK1J4UTkZE Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O0qfZJZfkh Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits and wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits and wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits and wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6525 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.1860 to 355.0874 deg, Dec +0.7201 to +11.2564 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.1860 to 355.0874 deg, Dec 0.7201 to 11.2564 deg Loaded 4852 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3987 out of 4082 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4082 out of 6525 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.596200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.596200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6525 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.1860 to 355.0874 deg, Dec +0.7201 to +11.2564 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.1860 to 355.0874 deg, Dec 0.7201 to 11.2564 deg Loaded 4852 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3987 out of 4082 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4082 out of 6525 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 7302 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.1869 to 355.0869 deg, Dec +0.7207 to +11.2552 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.1869 to 355.0869 deg, Dec 0.7207 to 11.2552 deg Loaded 4850 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4074 out of 4173 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4173 out of 7302 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits 2.2 pix Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits 2.2 pix fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 2.1 pix fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits 15.4 mag. Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits 11.9 mag. fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 12.6 mag. fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 11.9 (SNR ) 9.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.9gFa0tsQT7 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=357, bad_region=1627, passed=6523 Got 6523 stars (including 4612 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6523 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4491 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4481 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4481 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4481 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5224 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4491 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4481 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5224 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4481 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5224 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4481 stars left (next iteration limit 4929) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits N_match=4481 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1466 n_q2=894 n_q3=1343 n_q4=778 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.029 The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits -region wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.MFjylVlXgr (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, bad_region=1797, passed=7302 Got 7302 stars (including 5189 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7302 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4862 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5868 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5868 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5869 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4862 stars left (next iteration limit 5348) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits N_match=4862 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=1586 n_q2=976 n_q3=1435 n_q4=865 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.032 The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits -region wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.IK1J4UTkZE (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=35, bad_region=189, passed=661 Got 661 stars (including 439 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 661 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.8 to 11.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 416 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 414 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 354 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 414 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 430 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.8 to 11.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 417 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 415 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 430 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 415 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 430 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 415 stars left (next iteration limit 455) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=415 robust_rms=6.442 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.333 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=-1.000 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=415 robust_rms=0.422 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.893 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=-1.000 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=415 robust_rms_before=0.987 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.460 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.422 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.242 worst_region_rms_after=0.893 outer_annulus_rms_before=-1.000 outer_annulus_rms_after=-1.000 verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:08:46.558 +06:01:42.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 661 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3306622.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.987 -> 0.422 arcsec) SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 415 pairs from the previous matching) UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.8 to 11.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 373 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success SIP_REFIT: re-match found 373 pairs (415 from the previous matching) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=373 robust_rms=6.367 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.590 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=-1.000 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=373 robust_rms=0.445 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.781 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=-1.000 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=373 robust_rms_before=0.416 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.416 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.445 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.814 worst_region_rms_after=0.781 outer_annulus_rms_before=-1.000 outer_annulus_rms_after=-1.000 verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:08:46.558 +06:01:42.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 661 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3307038.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.416 -> 0.445 arcsec) Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 373 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 419 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 373 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 414 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits N_match=373 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.882 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=31 n_q2=54 n_q3=123 n_q4=165 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.955 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.O0qfZJZfkh (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=43, bad_region=162, passed=849 Got 849 stars (including 647 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 849 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 507 (Dec 0.8 to 11.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 625 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 623 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 585 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 623 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 676 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 507 (Dec 0.8 to 11.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 625 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 623 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 678 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 623 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 678 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 623 stars left (next iteration limit 685) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=623 robust_rms=6.113 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.175 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.175 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=623 robust_rms=0.480 arcsec worst_region_rms=2.294 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=2.294 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=623 robust_rms_before=1.024 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.454 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.480 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.880 worst_region_rms_after=2.294 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.684 outer_annulus_rms_after=2.294 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.880 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.880 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.454 arcsec matched=623 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits N_match=623 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=56 n_q2=120 n_q3=247 n_q4=200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits sigma_overall=0.334 worst_q_ratio=1.029 ref2=Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits sigma_overall=0.321 worst_q_ratio=1.032 new1=fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits sigma_overall=0.451 worst_q_ratio=1.955 new2=fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits sigma_overall=0.470 worst_q_ratio=1.130 reference average sigma_overall=0.3275 worst_q_ratio=1.0305 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ################################### ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q1: 31 -> 56, 44.643% > 20%; fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits vs fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q2: 54 -> 120, 55.000% > 20%; fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits vs fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing ERROR: large change in astrometric-star counts between the two new images (q3: 123 -> 247, 50.202% > 20%; fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits vs fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits) - usually a bad plate solution on one of them, sometimes stars crossing a quadrant boundary when the two images are widely offset, rarely a transparency change; continuing processing
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494_astrometric_residuals.png (4481 matched stars from wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466_astrometric_residuals.png (4862 matched stars from wcs_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305_astrometric_residuals.png (373 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306_astrometric_residuals.png (623 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits Last image: 2461324.86510693 11.10.2026 08:45:35.239 UTC WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Psc-07-Q2b1x1 as too few input images were matched to the reference image - wrong pointing? clouds? very bad focus? Blind plate solve of the unmatched second-epoch image fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits to check the telescope pointing Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits was not set. Trying to guess... The guess is 605 arcmin. No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits .... Determining astrometry method... Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software... Choosing aperture... Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 899 high-SNR stars for plate solving This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net. For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ ######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view ######### /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0 Using solve-field binary /usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3308446.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out3308446.axy"... Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10). Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10). log-odds ratio 194.369 (2.58956e+84), 32 match, 0 conflict, 44 distractors, 51 index. RA,Dec = (347.193,6.02584), pixel scale 5.9518 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+++++++++--++++-+++++-+++++--+------++----++----------+------+----------+(best)------------------------ Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3308446.solved to indicate this. Field: out3308446.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (347.194594, 6.027963) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (23:08:46.703, +06:01:40.666). Field size: 15.7345 x 10.5331 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 179.466 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> 'fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Oct 11 03:55 fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Oct 11 03:55 out3308446.wcs Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits)... done! done! All done! done The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits (fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits) Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3308446.xyls"... Reading sort column "FLUX_APER" Sorting sort column mmapping input file Copying table header. Writing row 0 Done Solving... Reading file "./out3308446.axy"... Only searching for solutions within 15.6733 degrees of RA,Dec (347.194,6.02713) log-odds ratio 39.4956 (1.42139e+17), 10 match, 0 conflict, 50 distractors, 27 index. RA,Dec = (347.197,6.03182), pixel scale 5.95323 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------+----++---------+-+---------+------++-------+--------+(best)---------------------------------------- Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits. Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3308446.solved to indicate this. Field: out3308446.xyls Field center: (RA,Dec) = (347.193656, 6.029151) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (23:08:46.477, +06:01:44.942). Field size: 15.7134 x 10.5326 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 179.474 degrees E of N Field parity: neg WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file. -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Oct 11 03:55 fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Oct 11 03:56 out3308446.wcs Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits for reading... done! Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits)... done! done! All done! The WCS header appears to be added with no errors. Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER Keyword does not exist Keyword has been changed to: VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list Reading input file "wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits"... Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it. Extracting sources... simplexy: found 4368 sources. Solving... Reading file "./wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.axy"... Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.475, 951.529] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 152.532 (1.75341e+66), 14 match, 0 conflict, 91 distractors, 14 index. RA,Dec = (347.194,6.02999), pixel scale 5.96196 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++-+----+--+------+--+--------+-------+------+---------------+----------------------------------- --> log-odds 152.532 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 292.617 (1.2079e+127), 27 match, 0 conflict, 352 distractors, 27 index. RA,Dec = (347.194,6.02999), pixel scale 5.96196 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++-+++--++-+------++++---++---+-------++---+-++--------------+-+--------------------------------- --> log-odds 292.617 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 529.68 (1.08931e+230), 50 match, 0 conflict, 329 distractors, 51 index. RA,Dec = (347.194,6.02999), pixel scale 5.96196 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++-+++-+++++-++-+-+++++--++---+-+-+---++--++-+++----+--------+++----++-------++--+----+---------- --> log-odds 529.68 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1030.51 (inf), 102 match, 0 conflict, 1413 distractors, 102 index. RA,Dec = (347.194,6.02999), pixel scale 5.96196 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++-++-+-+++++++++---+++++-+-++--++-+++--+-+----++--+++---+++----++-++--+++--+-+---++-+- --> log-odds 1030.51 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1854.63 (inf), 193 match, 0 conflict, 1322 distractors, 195 index. RA,Dec = (347.194,6.02999), pixel scale 5.96196 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++-++++-+++++++++---+++++-++++++++-++++++++++-+++--++++--+++++-+++-+++-+++-++++---++++- --> log-odds 1854.63 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3289.35 (inf), 372 match, 0 conflict, 2858 distractors, 381 index. RA,Dec = (347.194,6.02999), pixel scale 5.96196 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++-++++-+++++++++---+++++-++++++++-++++++++++-+++--++++--+++++++++-+++++++++++++--++++- --> log-odds 3289.35 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 5902.51 (inf), 708 match, 0 conflict, 2590 distractors, 733 index. RA,Dec = (347.194,6.02999), pixel scale 5.96196 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++-++++-+++++++++---+++++-++++++++-++++++++++-+++--++++--+++++++++-+++++++++++++--+++++ --> log-odds 5902.51 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 9917.06 (inf), 1283 match, 0 conflict, 2264 distractors, 1449 index. RA,Dec = (347.194,6.02999), pixel scale 5.96196 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++-++++-+++++++++---+++++-++++++++-++++++++++-+++--++++--+++++++++-+++++++++++++--+++++ --> log-odds 9917.06 Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.475, 951.529] arcmin Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 152.532 (1.75341e+66), 14 match, 0 conflict, 91 distractors, 14 index. RA,Dec = (347.194,6.02999), pixel scale 5.96196 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++-+----+--+------+--+--------+-------+------+---------------+----------------------------------- --> log-odds 152.532 Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 292.617 (1.2079e+127), 27 match, 0 conflict, 352 distractors, 27 index. RA,Dec = (347.194,6.02999), pixel scale 5.96196 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++-+++--++-+------++++---++---+-------++---+-++--------------+-+--------------------------------- --> log-odds 292.617 Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 529.68 (1.08931e+230), 50 match, 0 conflict, 329 distractors, 51 index. RA,Dec = (347.194,6.02999), pixel scale 5.96196 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++-+++-+++++-++-+-+++++--++---+-+-+---++--++-+++----+--------+++----++-------++--+----+---------- --> log-odds 529.68 Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1030.51 (inf), 102 match, 0 conflict, 1413 distractors, 102 index. RA,Dec = (347.194,6.02999), pixel scale 5.96196 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++-++-+-+++++++++---+++++-+-++--++-+++--+-+----++--+++---+++----++-++--+++--+-+---++-+- --> log-odds 1030.51 Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 1854.63 (inf), 193 match, 0 conflict, 1322 distractors, 195 index. RA,Dec = (347.194,6.02999), pixel scale 5.96196 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++-++++-+++++++++---+++++-++++++++-++++++++++-+++--++++--+++++-+++-+++-+++-++++---++++- --> log-odds 1854.63 Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 3289.35 (inf), 372 match, 0 conflict, 2858 distractors, 381 index. RA,Dec = (347.194,6.02999), pixel scale 5.96196 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++-++++-+++++++++---+++++-++++++++-++++++++++-+++--++++--+++++++++-+++++++++++++--++++- --> log-odds 3289.35 Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 5902.51 (inf), 708 match, 0 conflict, 2590 distractors, 733 index. RA,Dec = (347.194,6.02999), pixel scale 5.96196 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++-++++-+++++++++---+++++-++++++++-++++++++++-+++--++++--+++++++++-+++++++++++++--+++++ --> log-odds 5902.51 Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits) Verifying WCS of field 1. log-odds ratio 9917.06 (inf), 1283 match, 0 conflict, 2264 distractors, 1449 index. RA,Dec = (347.194,6.02999), pixel scale 5.96196 arcsec/pix. Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++-++++-+++++++++---+++++-++++++++-++++++++++-+++--++++--+++++++++-+++++++++++++--+++++ --> log-odds 9917.06 Got 16 solutions. Field: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Field center: (RA,Dec) = (347.194622, 6.029354) deg. Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (23:08:46.709, +06:01:45.674). Field size: 15.7152 x 10.5319 degrees Field rotation angle: up is 179.468 degrees E of N Field parity: neg Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.new"... renamed 'wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits was not found. verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Generating wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits created. verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:08:46.511 +06:01:42.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 5793 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3316738.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the blindly solved unmatched second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:08:35.062 +05:59:47.09 Second-epoch image center 23:08:46.511 +06:01:42.67 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0573 deg. ################################### The second-epoch image center is consistent with the reference image center (offset 0.0573 deg.) - the star matching failure is probably not a pointing problem ____ VaST output ____ --==VaST 1.0rc90==-- Parsing command line arguments... opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius! opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching! opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source! opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted! opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope) opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag! WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars. opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done! opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually! opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored! INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ... Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found. This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file. Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI)... OK Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files. Done with cleaning! VaST was started with the following command line: ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits Preparing to process 4 input FITS images... ######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ######## transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search! transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search! transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!! transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3 transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars transient search mode: not discarding large sources ################ Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix We have 4 images to process. SExtractor catalog cache: restored Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits catalog from cache SExtractor catalog cache: restored Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits catalog from cache Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads... Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Parent process says: we are done fork()ing. Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). Waiting for thread 2 to finish... autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.4,4.4,4.0,4.8,5.3,5.7 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.4,4.4,3.9,4.8,5.2,5.7 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Waiting for thread 1 to finish... autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits Done with SExtractor! TIMING SExtractor: 4 seconds Matching stars between images! No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine. Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-07-20T10:31:52.6962793 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-07-20T10:31:52.6962793 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-07-20T10:31:52.696 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits Exposure 20 sec, 20.07.2026 10:31:52.696 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461241.93892009 mid. exp. The reference image star 8745.385 48.076 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9501.840 18.325 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9382.678 20.174 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8720.013 19.538 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9091.636 17.176 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8089.973 11.824 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8600.208 10.690 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8174.481 11.183 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7848.068 9.353 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7562.545 8.407 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more reference image stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 30003, (30003 good for image matching) * rejected as having no flux measurement: 2 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 11 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 8210 * rejected close to frame edge: 116 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.8 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 53 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied. get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.03 Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.0 (4.0 sigma detection) The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.6 80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -7.7 Selected detection limit= -7.7 Final detection limit= -7.7 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0) Parameter box for transient search: 10.04.8 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 37 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 31850 * detected, using 530/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.022575, number_of_ambiguous_matches=719 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=1 pairs=28417 inliers=28417 rms 1.21 -> 0.47 pix, max corner correction 3.6 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.017614, number_of_ambiguous_matches=561 28416 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=28416 inliers=28416 rms 0.42 -> 0.42 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.009356, number_of_ambiguous_matches=298 28404 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=3 pairs=28404 inliers=28404 rms 0.30 -> 0.30 pix, max corner correction 0.8 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.003548, number_of_ambiguous_matches=113 28394 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = -0.019 31850 stars detected, 28394 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 27262, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 27262 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 27254 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00002*X_pix -0.00000*Y_pix -0.05196 Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)... Computing robust linear magnitude calibration. Used 25787 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -6.97 33459 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) Magnitude calibration is performed successfully! Saving observations to the cache... OK memory: 217776 kB used, 257260 kB peak, 65261712 kB available RAM processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-11T08:45:35.2397304 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-11T08:45:35.2397304 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-10-11T08:45:35.239 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits The star 9391.118 6.209 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9507.942 4.477 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9510.884 3.115 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9072.884 21.414 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8753.960 38.768 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8865.235 25.922 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8296.762 27.593 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7646.909 33.843 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8265.079 39.228 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8321.206 51.131 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 4549 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 1225 * rejected close to frame edge: 14 * rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.4 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 5 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 4549 * detected, using 100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000149, number_of_ambiguous_matches=5 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=4403 inliers=4403 rms 0.74 -> 0.66 pix, max corner correction 1.3 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000149, number_of_ambiguous_matches=5 4401 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=4401 inliers=4401 rms 0.62 -> 0.62 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000060, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2 4389 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=4389 inliers=4389 rms 0.38 -> 0.38 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000030, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1 4380 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 0.345 4549 stars detected, 4380 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 3949, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 3949 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 2577 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = -0.00014*X_pix -0.00026*Y_pix +1.95242 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 2577 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.35  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  33459 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) memory: 213264 kB used, 257260 kB peak, 65261712 kB available RAM processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-11T08:46:22.6025353 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-10-11T08:46:22.6025353 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-10-11T08:46:22.602 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits The star 9382.879 7.418 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9502.283 4.620 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8746.510 39.665 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9402.764 17.433 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9065.800 22.137 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7639.413 34.726 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7557.685 30.494 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8257.439 40.266 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8313.787 52.107 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8851.115 192.607 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 6299 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 5 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 1087 * rejected close to frame edge: 17 * rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.4 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 3 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 6299 * detected, using 104/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000239, number_of_ambiguous_matches=8 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=6136 inliers=6136 rms 0.63 -> 0.57 pix, max corner correction 0.9 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000209, number_of_ambiguous_matches=7 6135 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=6135 inliers=6135 rms 0.55 -> 0.55 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000120, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4 6119 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=3 pairs=6119 inliers=6119 rms 0.31 -> 0.30 pix, max corner correction 1.1 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000030, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1 6110 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 0.350 6299 stars detected, 6110 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 5593, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 5593 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 4453 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = -0.00008*X_pix -0.00021*Y_pix +1.32174 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 4453 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.33  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  33459 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) memory: 213256 kB used, 257260 kB peak, 65261712 kB available RAM processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%) TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds Done with measurements! =) Total number of measurements 61853 (61853 measurements stored in RAM) Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory... Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files... TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory... Creating vast_image_details.log ... Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK Selecting the best aperture for each source Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 4606 stars Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 9192 stars Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 3640 stars Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 4366 stars Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 6590 stars done! =) TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make' Computing, please wait a bit .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 28252 objects, the longest string is 385 bytes. Allocating memory for resorting the file. ----***** VaST processing WARNING *****---- You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one. Please investigate this! ************************************************************** This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic messages printed above (or the vast*.log files): * How many of the input images are matched? * Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable? * Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent? You may run ./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings (star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration file, see various examples in the VaST directory). If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/ ************************************************************** Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1) _____________________ ERROR running VaST on the field Psc-07-Q2b1x1 (less than 4 images processed) exp_start= 20.07.2026 10:31:52.696 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461241.93892009 ap= 4.8 rotation= 0.000 *detected= 30003 *matched= 30003 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-20_05-31-52_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits exp_start= 22.07.2026 10:03:25.908 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461243.91916560 ap= 4.8 rotation= -0.019 *detected= 31850 *matched= 28394 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-03-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0466.fits exp_start= 11.10.2026 08:45:35.239 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461324.86510693 ap= 4.4 rotation= 0.345 *detected= 4549 *matched= 4380 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-45-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits exp_start= 11.10.2026 08:46:22.602 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461324.86565512 ap= 4.4 rotation= 0.350 *detected= 6299 *matched= 6110 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-10-11_CI_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_035245_TTUQ2b1x1_3291096_pqG9j0PI/fd_Psc-07-Q2b1x1_2026-10-11_03-46-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0306.fits ########### Completed Psc-07-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461324.86510693 -observatory V36 14:37:17.15 -18:19:21.9 Mercury (0.0mag) 14:07:23.12 -20:56:18.1 Venus (-4.5mag) 08:39:51.77 +19:37:03.0 Mars (1.0mag) 09:34:20.73 +15:05:25.9 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:42:27.12 +01:36:57.7 Saturn (0.4mag) 04:12:05.02 +20:57:58.3 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:10:20.86 -00:25:36.0 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:10.86 -23:43:30.4 Pluto (14.5mag) 13:31:40.90 -14:24:15.7 Moon (-8.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Oct 11 03:55 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461324.86510693: 09:34:15.59 +15:05:54.8 Io (6.1mag) 09:34:30.25 +15:04:33.7 Europa (6.2mag) 09:34:35.21 +15:04:06.8 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:33:56.55 +15:07:37.3 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:34:05.18 +15:25:56.5 Himalia (15.6mag) 09:34:17.97 +15:05:40.7 Thebe (16.4mag) 09:32:55.38 +15:27:04.8 Elara (17.5mag) 09:36:47.07 +14:28:15.8 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 09:32:57.04 +15:32:30.0 Carme (18.8mag) 00:42:14.01 +01:37:10.2 Titan (8.2mag) 00:42:30.49 +01:36:52.0 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:41:56.37 +01:34:10.9 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:42:11.39 +01:36:49.3 Hyperion (14.1mag) 00:40:46.58 +01:24:38.5 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Oct 11 03:55 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461324.86510693: 02:48:39.23 +21:21:46.8 JWST 17:09:21.15 +39:40:17.5 Chandra 12:49:47.21 -62:10:04.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Oct 11 03:55 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461324.86510693 -observatory V36 03:46:08.82 +20:11:55.4 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:24:41.70 -33:29:51.0 14.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:39:48.34 -72:24:02.3 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:15:52.06 +34:38:59.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 07:30:10.62 +25:27:30.7 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:01:55.96 +35:39:56.2 16.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:26:45.51 +41:31:36.3 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:46:11.85 -13:35:23.0 16.6mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 12:17:03.02 +15:59:47.2 16.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:50:57.63 -02:43:06.5 16.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:42:31.06 +65:13:42.8 15.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:36:09.22 +43:17:32.0 17.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:45:38.20 +14:15:30.8 17.7mag A/2026 E1 16:29:18.17 -20:41:40.4 12.9mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 00:27:04.70 +19:00:04.0 17.6mag 2P/Encke 22:58:14.92 -31:42:08.9 14.5mag 10P/Tempel 02:10:45.44 +38:44:34.7 16.8mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:11:13.11 -08:09:39.4 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:22:26.28 -08:52:13.5 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 07:35:45.41 +16:00:49.6 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 03:00:05.32 +14:20:32.9 17.6mag 88P/Howell 07:38:52.16 +40:14:31.0 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:02:35.73 +14:09:20.2 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 11:40:58.31 +13:15:59.0 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 14:06:39.03 -32:12:32.8 17.8mag 124P/Mrkos 06:50:49.24 +19:18:35.1 15.6mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 21:39:42.40 +03:25:05.7 9.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 10:18:25.96 +01:39:27.7 14.3mag 169P/NEAT 03:29:20.79 +04:36:06.1 14.8mag 220P/McNaught 06:03:26.80 +45:12:51.3 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 07:27:35.55 +25:37:06.8 17.9mag 266P/Christensen 09:56:13.02 +31:37:41.9 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.6K Oct 11 03:55 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 05:39:14.97 +51:06:11.70 ASASSN-26fk 2026-10-5.53 -3.9 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.07 +52:55:19.10 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.43 15.37 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.59 +34:24:35.70 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.22 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Oct 11 03:55 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Oct 11 03:55 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 18:28:46.287 +43:53:39.30 AT 2026acxz 2026-09-22.18 19.7418 18:50:25.837 +51:48:48.31 AT 2026acxy 2026-09-26.14 19.507 17:29:04.550 +70:58:39.69 AT 2026acxx 2026-09-18.17 19.9857 18:36:38.362 +53:14:52.16 AT 2026acxw 2026-09-22.17 19.6863 03:16:13.837 +33:07:04.16 AT 2026acxv 2026-09-24.50 20.55 05:52:14.054 +15:53:08.19 AT 2026acxu 2026-09-22.43 20.8781 08:02:21.458 +24:05:52.06 AT 2026acxt 2026-09-24.51 19.9945 08:26:53.421 +00:01:31.92 AT 2026acxs 2026-09-24.52 18.9046 08:04:09.422 +26:03:07.21 AT 2026acxr 2026-09-16.52 20.3455 09:49:29.452 +22:28:47.85 AT 2026acxq 2026-09-24.52 18.9887 10:39:38.343 +25:39:08.54 AT 2026acxp 2026-09-24.53 18.7327 10:46:46.678 +35:46:40.03 AT 2026acxo 2026-09-24.53 18.7833 07:54:42.514 -01:42:07.85 AT 2026acxn 2026-09-24.52 20.2449 08:05:13.593 +06:17:43.23 AT 2026acxm 2026-09-24.52 19.4626 08:21:28.246 +03:46:33.77 AT 2026acxl 2026-09-24.52 19.7999 04:46:32.556 +00:05:47.64 AT 2026acxk 2026-09-22.48 20.2187 03:43:52.593 +21:51:56.00 AT 2026acxj 2026-07-06.48 19.0551 07:17:54.475 +23:18:27.43 AT 2026acxi 2026-09-25.47 19.7261 05:06:29.004 +73:49:45.19 AT 2026acxh 2026-09-16.43 20.0492 02:06:05.697 -18:58:51.46 AT 2026acxg 2026-09-24.55 20.61 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Oct 11 03:55 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 91 C